1 instructions thank you very much for agreeing to present at the 2012 rap implementation workshop....
TRANSCRIPT
1
Instructions
Thank you very much for agreeing to present at the 2012 RAP Implementation Workshop. As you discussed with Jon and/or Conrad, the theme of the workshop is “Getting the Job Done” – identifying what the needs are for each AOC to delist and making sure that the criteria, measures and indicators are in place to know when the job is done. With respect to “needs”, we have asked the AOC leads to include science and monitoring needs specifically which we plan to summarize by AOC. Our plan is to create a summary document of these needs by AOC as a resource for the workshop.
The objective of the Science and Monitoring presentations by the federal and provincial agencies is twofold: to provide staff with a better overall understanding of the diversity of scientific research and monitoring that takes place by the various agency units, and to learn more about specific science and monitoring projects being conducted and how they contribute to the AOC program either through BUI assessments, providing on-going monitoring data, and/or delisting criteria development. We are not looking for a general overview of agency roles and mandates, rather we want to hear about which BUIs are being worked on, what are the specific projects and results/accomplishments, and any challenges/lessons learned. So, when creating your presentation, please ensure the following information is included:
the unit name, who you are and what you do; the BUIs you work on; examples of accomplishments/results; and highlight any general or BUII-specific science or monitoring challenges experienced to date.
If there is additional information you wish to share with the group, please feel free to do so however there are time constraints on each agency so keep that in mind and between you and your staff, please allocate time to the individual units presenting so that it conforms to the total time of 1.5 hrs your agency has been provided. So, if each agency has 4 units presenting, each unit will have a maximum of 15 minutes. This will allow ample time for discussion. IF your agency doesn’t require 1.5 hrs total, please let us know what your time needs are and we’ll adjust the agenda accordingly.
We have created a unique look for the 2012 Workshop and attached are slides for you to create your presentation. Please return your slides to April White at [email protected] by Friday January 27th.
Also, if you have research documents or reports you would like to share, please provide an e-copy to April and bring a few copies along to the Workshop as there will be a resource table to display them.
Lastly, please bring a back up copy of your presentation to the Workshop in the (unlikely but possible) event a file becomes corrupted.
THANK-YOU again for your assistance !
Environment Canada
Shane de SollaDouglas Crump, Craig Hebert, Kim Hughes, Kyna Intini, Laura King, David Moore, Pamela Martin,
Kim Palonen, Chip Weseloh, Kim Williams
2012 RAP Implementation WorkshopGetting the Job Done !
AOC Science and Monitoring Activities, Projects and Accomplishments
3
Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division
Wildlife and Landscape Science Directorate Science and Technology Branch Research and monitoring of effects of
toxicological and ecological stressors on “wildlife”*
Measurement of contaminants (PCBs, metals, pesticides, etc) in body burdens
Assessment of health
* Wildlife: any animals excluding humans and fish
4
Canadian Wildlife Service
Environmental Stewardship Branch Population Assessment Section
Monitoring of wildlife populations
Colonial Waterbird monitoring Great Lakes Herring Gull Monitoring
Program (IJC)
6
Overview of Science and Monitoring Work Supporting BUIs
BUIs: Bird or animal deformities or reproduction
problems Degradation of fish and wildlife populations Restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption
Science and Monitoring Work (2011/2012): AOCs: Thunder Bay, St. Marys River, Detroit
River, St. Clair River, Spanish River
7
Science and Monitoring Work: Great Lakes Herring Gull Monitoring Program
(and other species – BCNH, terns)
Colonial Waterbird Decadal Survey Leopard Frog Reproductive and Contaminant
Survey Snapping turtle Reproductive and Contaminant
Survey Waterfowl contaminant monitoring Cormorant mutation study
Overview of Science and Monitoring Work Supporting BUIs con’t …
8
Assessed contaminants, reproduction of colonial waterbirds at Thunder Bay, St Mary’s River, Detroit River, Spanish River
Assessed contaminants, reproduction of black crowned night herons at Detroit River
Assessed embryonic development, incidence of intersex and deformities, hatching success of leopard frogs at St Clair, Detroit River
Assessed contaminants, embryonic development, hatching success of snapping turtles at St. Clair
Assessed colonial waterbird populations at numerous AOCs
Highlights of Results and Challenges
Study/Task Species Data Type Data Collection
Past Current
Thunder Bay HERG Health effects, Contaminants
~2000 2011/12
St. Marys River HERG, COTE Health effects, Contaminants
- 2011/12
Detroit River LEFR, BCNH Reproduction, Contaminants
2009-2011 2011/12
St. Clair River AOC includ.
Walpole I.
LEFR, SNTU Reproduction, Contaminants
2007/08 2011/12
SNTU Contaminants 2007/08 2011/12
Waterfowl Contaminants 2010/11 -
Spanish River HERG Contaminants - 2011/12
Highlights of Results and Challenges
Artificial incubation of eggs Viability, pipping success, and
deformities
Health of Colonial Waterbirds
Artificial Incubation
total eggs viable infertile dead
pipping success
deformities
Double Island 23 18 2 3 86% 0
Pumpkin Point 17 16 0 1 94% 1
Hay Point 15 13 1 1 93% 1
Egg viability of herring gulls from St. Marys River AOC
Productivity, condition, deformities, stress response, ecological tracers, and physiological endpoints Herring gulls (SMR, TB),
herons (DR) and terns (SMR)
Health of Colonial Waterbirds
D ouble Pum pk in Hay0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Productivity of herring gulls from St. Marys River AOC
reference
12
Colonial Waterbird Decadal Survey
1
2
5
34
6
10
9
7
11
8
1213
15
1 Granite I.2 Agawa Rks.3 Big Sister I.4 Gull I.5 Channel-Shelter I.6 Double I.
7 Chantry I.8 Fighting I.9 Middle I.10 Port Colborne 11 Niagara R.12 Hamilton Hrbr.13 Toronto Hrbr.14 Snake I.15 Strachan I.
14
1,200 km
N
Population counts (nests) of all colonial waterbirds
Annual counts at selected colonies
13
Great Lakes Herring Gull Monitoring Program
Data on PCBs, OCs, PBDEs, dioxin/furans, Hg, and other compounds are available (including other species)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Mid
dle I.
Ch-Sh
elter
I.
Fightin
g I.
Hamilt
on
Snake
I.
Gull I
.
Strach
an I.
Toron
to
Big Sist
er I.
Port C
olbo
rne
Niagar
a
Granit
e I.
Agawa
Doubl
e I.
Chantr
y I.
Con
cent
rati
on (
mic
rogr
ams/
gram
)
C
A
A A, B
A, B, C
A, B, C
A, B, C
A, B, C A, B, C A, B, C
A, B, C A, B, C A, B, C B, CC
Sum PCBs, 2003-2007
14
Laboratory exposures: embryos raised in i) water and ii) water and sediment from AOC and reference sites
Examined hatching success and embryonic development (i.e., frequency of deformities)
Embryonic development of leopard frogs
15
Insert text
Intersex in young of year male leopard frogs
oocyte
developing sperm
Seminiferous tubules
Normal Testes
Testes with Testicular Oocytes
AlgonTiny
MurrayHumber
RRSnye
LyonsUCBS
CootesBelleville
DeadCreekGrindstone
TurkeyWheatley
Site
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Mea
n %
egg
s ha
tche
d
** *
AlgonquinTiny Marsh
UCBSRR
NWADead Creek
WheatleySnye
HumberBelleville
MurrayLyons
TurkeyCootes
Grindstone
Location
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Con
cent
ratio
n (n
g/g)
sum Chlordanes DDE sum PBDEs sum PCBs
* No PBDEs were measured
**
*
Snapping turtle monitoring
Mutation rates in cormorants
Germline mutations Inherited from parents
PAH exposure Hamilton Harbour
Not funded by GLAP!
Summary
AOCs to be targeted St. Marys River (2012) Hamilton Harbour (2012, 2013) Thunder Bay (2014)
Colonial Waterbird population surveys (decadal and annual) multiple AOCs
Great Lakes Herring Gull Monitoring Program multiple AOCs