1 in the united states district court … the united states district court for the northern district...

100
o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. MIDWEST SOLVENT RECOVERY, INC., a corporation; MIDWEST INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC., a corporation; INDUSTRIAL TECTONICS, ) CIVIL ACTION INCORPORATED, a corporation; V and E ) NO. H-79-556 CORPORATION, a corporation; and ) ERNEST DeHART, EDWARD D. CONLEY, ) HELGA C. CONLEY, LOVZE DeHART, CHARLES A. LICBT, DAVID E. LICHT, DHLORES LICHT, EUGENE CLISIAX, JEANBTTE CLISIAK, LUTHER G. BLOOMBERG, ROBERT J. DAWSON, JR., VICTOR KIRSCB, JOHN KIRSCB, EVA KZRSCH, JOHN MILETICB, and MARY MILETICH, individuals. Defendants, ROBERT J. DAWSON, JR., Cross-Claiaant, MIDWEST SOLVENT RECOVERY, INC., a corporation; MIDWEST INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC., a corporation; INDUSTRIAL TECTONICS, INCORPORATED, a corporation; V and E CORPORATION, a corporation; and ERNEST DeHART, EDWARD D. CONLEY, HELGA C. CONLEY, LOVIE DeHART, CHARLES A. LICHT, DAVID E. LICHT, DELORES LICHT, EUGENE CLISIAK, JEANETTE CLISIAX, LUTHER G. BLOOMBERG, VICTOR KIRSCH, JOHN KIRSCH, EVA KIRSCH, JOHN MILETICH, and MARY MILETICB, indi- viduals. Defendants,

Upload: truongdan

Post on 29-Jun-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

HAMMOND DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MIDWEST SOLVENT RECOVERY, INC.,a corporation; MIDWEST INDUSTRIALWASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC., acorporation; INDUSTRIAL TECTONICS, ) CIVIL ACTIONINCORPORATED, a corporation; V and E ) NO. H-79-556CORPORATION, a corporation; and )ERNEST DeHART, EDWARD D. CONLEY, )HELGA C. CONLEY, LOVZE DeHART,CHARLES A. LICBT, DAVID E. LICHT,DHLORES LICHT, EUGENE CLISIAX,JEANBTTE CLISIAK, LUTHER G. BLOOMBERG,ROBERT J. DAWSON, JR., VICTOR KIRSCB,JOHN KIRSCB, EVA KZRSCH, JOHN MILETICB,and MARY MILETICH, individuals.

Defendants,

ROBERT J. DAWSON, JR.,

Cross-Claiaant,

MIDWEST SOLVENT RECOVERY, INC.,a corporation; MIDWEST INDUSTRIALWASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC., acorporation; INDUSTRIAL TECTONICS,INCORPORATED, a corporation; V and ECORPORATION, a corporation; andERNEST DeHART, EDWARD D. CONLEY,HELGA C. CONLEY, LOVIE DeHART,CHARLES A. LICHT, DAVID E. LICHT,DELORES LICHT, EUGENE CLISIAK,JEANETTE CLISIAX, LUTHER G. BLOOMBERG,VICTOR KIRSCH, JOHN KIRSCH, EVA KIRSCH,JOHN MILETICH, and MARY MILETICB, indi-viduals.

Defendants,

1 The deposition Of CHARLES A. LIGHT, adefendant in tha above entitled cause, called by the

2 plaintiff herein, pursuant to notice and pursuant tothe Proviaioni of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

3 for the United States District Courts, taken beforeBrenda J. Cueller, a duly qualified and competent

4 court reporter at 507 State Street, Haanond, Indiana,on Friday, January 4, 1980, commencing at the hour

5 of 10:00 a .m.

G

7

8

a

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A P P E A A N C E S :

MR. ANDREW B. BAKER,Assistant U.S. Attorney,507 State Street,Hannoad, Indiana,

on behalf of plaintiff;

MR. DAVID E. LIGHT,280 Madison Avenue,Hew York, New Tork 10016

on behalf of defendantsCharles Licht, Delores Lichtand Industrial Tectonics.

ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Michael Berman,Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region Five,230 South Dearborn,Chicago, Illinois 60604

2A

CHARLES A. LIGHT

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

a defendant, called as a witness by the plain-tiff herein, being first duly sworn to testifythe truth and nothing but the truth, deposethand saith as follows:

DIRECT EXAMINATIONBy MX. Baker<

Would you state your name, please, sir?

Charles A. Licht, L-i-e-h-t.

In what city do you reside?

Olympia Fields, 0-1-y-m-p-i-a, Fields, Illinois.

And what is your occupation, sir?

I am a Counseling Engineer.

Are you self-employed or —

No. I'm employed by Charles Licht Engineering

Association as incorporated.

And where does that firm do business?

o

&. At 414 West Lincoln Highway, Chicago Height*,

2 ft Are you involved in any other enterprise?

3 A. I'm also president of Industrial Tectonics,

4 T-e-c-t-o-n-i-c-s, Incorporated also based at

s the same addreas.

ft And what is the business of that firm, air?

7 A. The firm Industrial Tachtonics has two operations

8 within the corporate structure. One of the

9 operations an original operation was the design

10 and conatruotion of special machinery; and more

11 recently the aeeond division called the Chemical

12 Division waa set up to handle processing of

13 certain types of liquid waste.

And when waa Induatrial Techtonics incorporated?

15 MR. LICBTi Within the last five or six —

16 THE WITNESS: I think, it was October, 1969,

17 but I'm not positive of that.

And when was the Chemical Division created?

19 A. In October of 1977.

When did yon first cone up with the idea for the

21 creation of the Chemical Division within Industrial

22 Techtonioa?

23 A. During the spring of 1977. I can't tell you the

24 specific date, but some time in the spring of

25 1977, I was approached by two gentlemen who were —

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

who at that time war* in liquid wast* in particular

acid waste disposal; and we discussed the possi-

bility of setting up within the Industrial Techton;cs

corporate shall a disposal operation that handled

paint sludges and other Material that had valuable

components for reclaim.

And who ware these two gentlemen?

One of them is Barold Eagan and the other is

Alfred Tenny, T-e-n-n-y.

Prior to this time, had yon been associated in

any business enterprises with either of those two

gentlemen?

I've known Tenny for quite a while. He had set

up his company at about the same time I set up

my Counseling Engineer company. They worked in

the area of water pollution control. We worked

pretty much in the area of air pollution and

solid waste management, and so, we would occasionally

use the services of their laboratories for cer-

tain types of work and also their engineering

staff, certain types of water pollution control

work.

MR. LIGHT: But yon are actually Independent

of them and independent of you?

THE WITNESS: Oh, yes.

c

1

2

3

4

5

S

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

a

JL

aJL

ft

&

ftJL

aJL

MR. BAKEHi Q What step* ware takan than

to bring on thi« idea into practice — raality?

Eagan had prior dealing* with a gentleman named

Ernie OeBart.

Op until thi« time in the apring of 1977 when

yon met with these two men, had yon met Erne*tDeHart?

No.

Bad any dealings with him?

Ho.

Or any of hia eorporationa?

Ho.

Did Mr. Bagan or did Mr. Tenny?

Ye*.

What happened?

Bagan brought to our attention the fact that

OeBart wa* interacted in veiling the operation

that he had. We indicated that we were not

particularly interested in buying hi* operation,

but since he wanted to leave the area for a

variety of rea*on* that we — well, let me atari

that over again.

When we met — when Eagan, Tenny,and I

met and di*cu**ed the pro* and con* going into

the liquid wa*te area other than that which hi*

1

/-- 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

IS

16;

17

I 18

; 19

20

21

22

23

24

25

a

i.

aa.tt

t.

a

A

a

company was — Tenny's company was already in —

It was — we looked over — we looked at the

economics of this thin? and saw that it could be

a reasonably profitable operation if the technology

of the operation was dramatically improved; that

is, the paint sludges could be processed to re-

claim the solvent contents.

Was this essentially the operation of what OeHart

was doing?

No. All OeHart was doing was decanting the

light eads of the — in a drum of paint sludge,

there will be some fairly clean solvent at the

top, murkier material down toward the bottom,

and as taken down off this lighter solvent, I

could generate a resaleable, reclaimable component;

but he did no processing in there.

When did you first meet DeHart?

Around Labor Day of 1977.

And where did that meeting take place?

I don't remember.

Prior to this time, did you visit his site on

15th Avenue in Gary?

Ho. We did not see his site until after — after

I had met him.

Prior to this time. Labor Day of 1977, did you

c

1 have any experience in the handling of paint

2 solvents residue disposal?

3 A. Yes.

4 £ What was that experience?

5 X Well, a number of our clients are in the steel

6 drum reclamation business, and they obtain drums

7 from various sources which contain varying amounts

8 of residual in these drums, and they run from

9 ounces to tons of fallons in any given drum. And

10 we were required that by one of our clients to

11 design a process for preeleaning the drums prior

12 to their incineration steps meant handling of

13 these liquid wastes, and for another client, we

14 were asked to develop some fundamentals for a

15 means to dispose of these materials by means of

16 incineration.

17 & You had no experience in reclaiming any material

is from solvents for sale, is that correct?

19 ». That's correct.

20 ft But that's what you intended to do with this

21 operation?

22 *• Yes. There is technology that appears to be

23 commercially available. He talked with two finis

24 three firms who manufacture stills of the type

25 that can be used in this type of material, and

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

18

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

8

thay danonatratad to uo, not actual physical

demonstration, but in corraapondenca and litaratnrd

and in a variety of presentations that thay had

tha coapatant technology to handla this material.

Okay.

MR. LICET: Excuse ae. Mr. Baker, whan yon

mentioned experience, had Mr. Licht baan involved

in tha actual doing of it aa compared to having

tha aaginaaring technical knowledge for it?

MR. BAKERt I Meant experience rather than

knowledge — soae technical knowledge.

MR. LICHTi Doing right?

MS. BAKZRi That's correct.

Q What steps did you take to implement

this business prior with meeting DeHart in businean

in 1977?

He had taken no steps at that point because we

were not aura just where this was taking was to,

and we had -- I had dona some research to the

extant of finding out whether this technology

we were discussing aaongst ourselves was reasonable

feasible, and so forth, and this I had dona. But

up to that point, we had dona nothing in a business.

sense.

What transpired at the Labor Day meeting of 1977?

o12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

I can't tell you on a day by day basis, Mr. Baker.

I don't recollect. I can tell you what happened

between Labor Day and the time we actually bought

a customer list front DeHart.

As best as you can recall, I would like to have

your --

I don't remember any one day.

— the conversations.

I don't remember the conversations on a day by

day basis.

Bow long did you meet him over a period of time?

Two or three t.imes.

Okay. Can yon relate to us as best you can what

occurred then in your various talks with him?

We met with DeHart to talk over the possibility

of obtaining from him a list of customers BO

that we could set op a process where we would

reclaim solvents on a distillation basis, which

was entirely different process than he had

operating. And where he had access to the sources,

we felt would be of great benefit to us to have

the entree into the sources for these materials.

MR. LIGHT: You mean, those persons who

had —

MR. BAKER: Customer list?

<"

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

10

MR. LICET: Yes.

THE WITNESSt Basically, since the consent

of the technology we had in mind was no different

than that he had going at, there was nothing

really that he had to sell us that was of any

value except the access to the customers which

was by buying that would save us a great deal

of start-up expense and so on. We did buy —

ultimately, we did buy a couple pieces of equip-

ment from him —• small vacuum truck, a damp truck,

a bulldoxer, some other odds and ends. I can't

recall.

what transpired then, we discussed with

DeBart what he felt his equipment was worth,

what he felt his customers list was worth, and

what we finally — we finally agreed on a price

to be paid to him on a aeries of payments. Actual

the money was paid to three separate corporations.

Did yon rent any property from him?

Tea. On a basis of the fact that we did not

have a site and he was going to — he was going

to sell off his customer list to someone, we felt

that it would interruption aince there were a

great number of people in the business of handling

liquid waste at that time that by gaining the

c

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

10

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

X

ftA.

ft

A.

ft

*

A.

ft

A.

11access to his customers list, it would save us

a great deal of tine and effort.

Did you buy hi* customers list?

Sir?

You bought his customers list?

Ne bought his customers list.

Ton bought equipment from his corporation?

Yes, we bought some pieces of equipment.

And yon rented property from him?

We rented property from him on a six month basis.

The lease was signed to initiate with the date

of the transaction which I recollect was the

18th of October, but I'm not absolutely positive.

MB. LIGHTI That's 1977?

TRK WITBESBt 1977.

NX. BAKER: Q Hhen did you first visit

the site?

Barly September of 1977.

What was the condition of the site at that time?

At that time, the site had a large number of

bnrnt drums spread out over an area that extended

beyond the area indicated that he was leasing

to ns and a fairly substantial number of unbnrnt

drums that were stacked in various places around

the site; that is, the entire site.

o

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

ft

A.

o

12

Hit. LIGHTt You mean, Mr. DeHart's site or —

THE WITNESS: And it turned out later other

land as well.

MR. BAKERi Q I'll hand you what has been

marked as Deposition Exhibit No. 1. I'll ask you

if you're familiar with that site?

Yes. It appears to be — it appears to be the

site of the —

Would the area bordered in red approximate the

area over which drums — fire burnt drums as well

as new drums existed at the time yoo visited

the site in September of 1977?

Yes, sir, and possibly even further to the right

of this which weald be to the north — possibly,

even further to the north.

Okay. How, the southern — the bottom border is

how you have it held which is nearest you which

is the street called Blaine Street?

Yes.

At that time, did drums exist on both sides on

Blaine Street?

Absolutely.

That's in September 1977?

Yes, sir.

Were there new drums as well as fire burnt drums?

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

0

ft.

ft

A,

ft

A,

ft

A.

»

A.

ft

A.

ft

13

Yes, air.

Neat of Blaine Street — east of Blaine Street?

Yea, correct.

Now, what area of this did you understand to be

renting from Mr. DeHart?

Well, we understood that the area we were renting

from him baaed on the — on the lease was

approximately an acre of land starting at the

south red mark here and extending — I don't

remember the exact amount — some number of feet

to the north and some number of feet to the west.

The red marks in that area is marked as a fence

between the disposal site and Connor Engineering?

I don't recollect that there was a fence there

at the time. I think, the fence was put up by

Connor at a later date.

Bat it now exists?

Yes.

Along the red line, you described?

Along the south border, yes.

Can you estimate how many intact drums there were

on the site that were not damaged by fire in

September 1977?

Excuse me. You mean, on DeHart'a area?

I mean, entire site.

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

14

MR. LIGHT: Entire site.

THE WITNESS: There were a number of thousand

I don't have an axaot account. I navar took an

exact account.

0. Son* of these intact drums wars on the east and

•oma on the other «ita?

A. Ya».

0 Total dumping site was uaed by Mr. OaHart enter-

priaaa?

X Yes.

0 I* thara a concrete loading dock or atructure

on this?

X There is a concrete dock on the OeHart piece of

property. I can't tell you precisely where.

There im not only a concrete loading dock, but

concrete pavement at ground level in the area

that DeBart claimed to be on hia — on the land

that he owned.

MR. LIGHT: Excuae ae. Off the record.

(Whereupon, there waa adiscussion off the record.)

MR. BAKER: Q What documents were generated

by your business negotiations with Mr. DeHart and

hia enterprises?

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

15

Our local counaal generated four documents. Three

of then were bills of sale to three different

companies, and one was a lease involving OeHarts

personally and Industrial Tectonics.

Were any memorandums created relating to these

sales or acquisitions?

Only in normal accounting records set up in the

book for depreciation purposes.

Would yon describe Mr. DeBart for us?

JL Physical description of Mr. DeBart?

0 Yes.

A. Mr. DeHart is ̂ approximately five-foot-six,

five-foot-seven.

Q> Bow tall are you, sir?

L About my height. I'm five-foot-six-and-a-half.

ft All right.

L He's squat, stocky man. I would estimate that he

probably weighs close to 200 pounds. Square jar,

baldiah — a little bit of reddish hair on the

perimeter. Be did not wear glasses. I don't

remember any particular visible scars or anything

like that that would identify him.

Q How old a man would you say he was, sir?

t. Middle fifties.

QL Did anything unusual happen in the course of

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

a

JL

ft

X

a

A.

16

your paying for the material or leases that yon

entered with Mr. OeHart?

Tea, there were several things. First, he was

unable to give us a proper title to a seai-trailer

that we were going to buy fron bin, and so the

value of that trailer was taken out of the total

amount that waa due to DeBart and that was covered

by a letter to OeBart.

Now, this letter and the three bills of sale* and

one lease, are they still maintained in the

record of your company?

Tea, at 414 Meet Lincoln Highway.

What else happened?

There was also at one point we felt that DeBart

who had promised to give us some assistance in

teaching new employees how to decant the drums

and so forth, had not lived up to his part of the

agreement to give us a few weeks and it was

written out how many hours and so forth.

You had a contract with him and services he would

perform for you in the new enterprise?

I believe, it was part of the purchase — in one

of the purchase eontracta that he would give us

a few hours or some number of hours. I don't

remember the exact number, but it's in the document

o

17

1 to teach u« bow to do the work he waa doing

2 since we knew that at leaat until auch tiae as

3 we could get our own aite purchased and the per-

4 mits obtained from the — whichever state, Illinoi i

5 or Indiana, that we would have to continue to

6 operate on the baaia that he operated. It would

7 only be we anticipated obvioualy becauae a abort

8 tern of the leaae -- we anticipated to be off

9 that aite within the acope of the tern of the

10 leaae.

11 ft How long waa the leaae to run?

12 A. Six Bontba.

13 ft And did you in fact move your enterpriaea within

14 the tan* of the lease?

,5 L Ho, we did not. And we asked DeBart for a six

18 month extension, and it was granted.

,7 ft Do you know where Mr. DeBart's address waa at

is this time?

19 JL No. By thia time all of the correapondence,

20 checka, and so forth were being delivered to

2t Mr. DeHart's accountant, Bill Hicky and Aaaociataa

22 on Lincoln Highway in Olympia Field*.

23 0- Did you receive a customers list you had sought

24 to purchase from Mr. DeHart?

25 A. Y«8.

IS

c

Did you receive any other documents from Mr.

2 DeHart besides the customers list?

3 a. No.

4 9 Is the customer list you maintained from Mr.

DeHart, is that maintained in the files of your

corporation?

7 A. Well, in actual fact, the customer list was not

8 a formal type list with names and addresses and

9 so forth, but rather was an —

10 MR. LIGHT: Off the record.

11 (Whereupon, there was adiscussion off the record.)

12

13 THE WITNESS: It was a series of cards per-

haps two, three dozen of them.

15 MR. BAKER: Three by five index cards?

,6 A. Yes. I don't think they were index cards but

17 Rolodex cards, but that type of card.

,8 flt Were those cards maintained in your business or

No. Those cards I'm certain were discarded some-

20 where along the line. We picked up the stuff

21 on our own forms and records so that they could

22 be properly filed.

23 MR. LICET: So, they're transcribed then?

24 THE WITNESS: Yes.

25 MR. BAKER: Q In what form do you keep your

o

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

19

list of customers for Industrial Tectonics

Chemical Division?

There are several places in our records where they

are kept. They're kept on a Rolodex fija. They

are kept also in a standard file drawer with a

separate envelope or file folder for every

customer.

Bow many custoaers does the Chemical Division

have?

Couple dozen.

Does this include firas that may have been a

customer at one tiae and have ceased to be a

customer?

Oh, yes. But the company has been and out of

operation for a year or so now, so all the records

are there, but there are no customers.

You mean, the division of it?

Yes. The Chemical Divi ion.

What corporations, if any, did Mr. DeHart utilise

in his dealings with them?

They used — I don't have the precise name. You

have on your document two of the names that are

correct tbe U.S. Waste — I'm sorry. The Midwest.

MR. LIGHT: Midwest —

MR. BAKER: Q Solvlant Recovery?

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

20

A. Solvent Recovery was one and Midwest Waata Dis-

posals was another. There was a third company

also, U.S. Surplus Sales Company.

Q Do you know what business, if any, Mr. DeHart

conducted under the last name?

A. I was under the impression that he was literally

in the surplus business; that is, he was buying

surplus goods in government auctions and than

reselling them to consumers. Be had an office

and a warehouse somewhere.

ft Do yon know where it was?

A. Yes. It was on Kennedy Avenue. I can't tell you !

the exact address. It was on Kennedy Avenue

in Schererville, though. Perhaps two miles north

of the junction of — Junction Boulevard and

Kennedy Avenue.

ft Okay. After the leasing the premises from Mr.

DeHart and buying the equipment and customer

list, what did you or your organization do at the

15th Avenue site?

A. Well, we proceeded to receive liquid waste, decant

the materials.

ft Okay. Before you did that, did you have to do

anything at the site in preparation for your

activities there?

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

aJL

aJL

aJL

0

JL

0.

JL

0

21

Da had to relocate perhaps 100, 150 drums that

were blocking part of the dock right out in front.

Here these intact drums?

These were intact drums.

And you relocated them, what did you do with them?

He emptied them and disposed of the contents.

In what manner did you —

He emptied the drum putting them in an accumulator

tank which is under the dock, and then having

accumulated liquid, hauled off to the landfill

under appropriate permits. The hauling was done

by a company called Scrap Haulers, Incorporated,

and it was taken to the CID Waste Management

landfill at 135th and just off the Calumet Express-

way.

Were you present at the site when this drum re-

moval and --

No.

Who did it, if you know?

Well, I really don't know specifically who would

have been on the truck that moved them, but the

supervisor that we hired. Dale Robinson, was who

had at one time or another had been an employee

DeHart was somewhat familiar of the activity.

Robinson had been employed by Mr. DeHart previously?

o

22

1 *• Yaa. I think, basically as a maintenance mechanic

2 though.

How did you come to hire Mr. Robinaon for your

enterprises?

Hell, we felt we had to have aomaona with familiardty

of what had been done there in terns of handling

these liquids.

When you say "we", who do you mean, sir?

9 X Well, Eagan, Tenny, Myself.

10 ft So, what did you do then?

n A. We made the arrangements to clear with CIO to

12 establish appropriate credit with them since

13 apparently DeHart didn't have very good credit

14 with them — made arrangements with Scrap Haulers

15 to establish credit with them so that we could

ie move these materials off to the landfill. Ha aluo

17 delivered the sludging material that could not

18 be pumped in drums and drum* that could not be

19 emptied to CID in a dump truck that we modified

20 and used for hauling.

21 ft Where did yon obtain the dump truck?

22 *. That waa one of the items we purchased from DeHart,

23 but as I say, we had to modify rather extensively

24 to use it.

25 ft Did Mr. DeHart have title to any of the equipment

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

23

he did supply to you?

Yes. We war* able to retain valid title to both

the vacuum track and dump track.

There arc copies of these tracks maintained in

the office of Industrial Tectonics?

Yes, sir.

was there any farther written conversation with

you and Mr. DeBart?

There are. Our — I recollect, but I'm not

positive that there was a letter asking him to

come give us the tine that we were entitled to.

There was some correspondence relative to the

extent of the lease when April cam* around and

we were still unable to obtain a site.

I gather fro* your discussion of the work you

had to do to begin your operations, that Mr. DeHart:

was no longer conducting this crude solvent re-

covery operation?

Ho, it was an operation. It was operating when

we took over, but simply, he was operating under

cramped conditions which were not necessary.

So, the operation he was going on -- going up unti:

the date you took it over, approximately?

Tea. Be may have stopped a few days before, but

basically in order to maintain the customer list.

o

24

1 we continued to service at least some of th«ae/

2 people. Th«re ware a few people we found ware

3 not sanding in appropriate material* and we4 stopped servicing them.5 ft Tou say some people were not supplying appropriate

6 material? What do you mean, sir?

? i. Basically, we were maintaining the customer list

8 that would be able to supply us with solvents

9 bearing materials. So, that when we got our

10 distillation equipment operating we would be able

11 to distill the solvents and claim them. Samples

12 we ran incidentally claimed that the solvents on

13 the average would run over — well over the 50

14 percent of the volume coming in, and we could

is expect that somewhere between 15 and 20 gallons

16 of solvent could be able to recover to each of

17 the drums that came to us.

18 ft Prom your analysis or experience, do you know

19 what else was in this material besides the solvent i

20 that you were recovering to sell?

21 JL Well, the pigments and resins were typical of

22 the paint sludges. In one group of material,

23 there was a mixture of resin which are basically

24 the vehicles you use to paint, acrylic resins

is with solvents, and the type of thing we stopped

o

1

2

3

4

5

S

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

A.

aJL

a

*•aJL

a

*•

a

25

dealing with was; for example, one source was

•ending out a mixture of water and lacquer. Hell,

the lacquer is not raclaimable and the water is

certainly no particular thing that we wanted to

horse with. So, we stopped doing business with

that particular company.

These solvents in the paints you were recovering,

were they flammable material?

Tes, low flash point material.

By low flash point, what do you mean?

Under appropriate test conditions the materials

can be ignited at temperatures below 100 degree

fahrenheit.

Do you know how low of a degree?

Somewhere down as low as 50 degrees.

Fahrenheit?

Tes.

Do you know what components were in resins and

sludges left after your solvents was removed?

we had an indication of a typical chemistry of —

people who manufacture paints, and I don't remember

the chemistry offhand — but basically, they were

the resin vehicles that are used in the manufacturing

of paint.

This includes lead in some instances?

c

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

aA.

a

A.

aA.

ft

A,

ft

A.

26

Not as a ro»in but as a pigment, yes. Because

while you know lead is not allowed in household

paint, it is allowed in industrial paint.

And were you getting industrial paint?

The material we were getting were coming both

from paint companies and paint suppliers -—

industrial paint suppliers.

Mere there any other metals contained in the

pigment —

Ho. Metals that are in the metal oxide, so,

there is an array of metals that will be present

which makes the pigment of any paint.

Chromium would be one of those metals?

Chromium would be one of those metals. Iron would

be one of those metals.

Would arsenic be a metal found in paint?

MR. LIGHT: If you know.

THE WITNESSi I don't know. I don't think

so, but I never heard of it being used as a pigment

MS. BAXERi 0 Did your operation at the

site begin immediately after the signing of the

lease?

Yes.

How, was Mr. Robinson in charge of that?

Tes.

c

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

ft.

ft

L

ft

A.

ft

*•

ft

JL

ft

*•

27

Did Mr. Robin«on file an application for employment

with your operation?

Now, you're looking through a file of

document*. !• that the file of your employee

record* for Industrial Tectonics Chemical Division

Yes, sir.

— that you brought with you here today?

Right. Tes, I have here an application that vas

filled in by Mr. Robinson.

Does it indicate a date, air?

The date indicated is November 7th of 1977.

At this point, was he already at work for you, or

did you -- or was it that long before you actually

did start?

I would have to go back and check the payroll

rather. But there was a hiatus of a week or two,

but I'm not sure.

Could yon describe Mr. Robinson for me, sir?

Mr. Robinson is a man who is about five-ten. Ob,

perhaps 200 pounds, balding, blonde-grey hair.

Last time I saw him, he was wearing sideburns.

Could you describe his age?

Well, I believe he was around 40, but in actual

fact, he looked substantially older than that.

Be looked perhaps late forties or early fifties.

o

28

but I believe, he Bight have been only 40.

Would you hazard a guess aa to the date of birth

shown on the application, »ir?

. Yea, February 9, 1940. I recall that I was sur-

5 prised at his birth date, and I talked about it

6 one tine that he must have lived a tough life to

look aa old aa he did at his age.

Do you know what other occupations he had prior

9 to hi* employment with you or aaid subsequent

10 to his employment with you?

11 1. Basically, he was working as a maintenance mechanic

12 before. And when we shut down the Chemical Division

13 operation, we actually kept hid on the payroll,

14 but he was being used over at By-Products —

is By-Products Management as a maintenance mechanic

te for a number of months before we decided there

17 was no chance of our finding the appropriate site

is to move our operation to.

19 & At that point, he waa then actually working for

20 By-Products but being paid by your corporation?

21 A, Yes. That was in compensation for the fact that

22 By-Products was performing certain things for us -

23 handling our telephones, services, and so on.

24 ft Who handled the obtaining of shipments of your

25 solvent waste into the site?

o

29

1 i. We bad both a local and Chicago Una coning into

2 dispatch offices in Scherervilla which was shared

3 with By-Products Management.

4 Qi Did your personnel or By-Products personnel handle

5 the orders?

6 L It was By-Products personnel, but this is why we

7 were paying for work that was being done, and we

8 were paying payroll on this nan who was doing

9 work for the* in compensation for this.

10 ft Okay. What action did yon yourself physically

11 perform in furtherance of the operation at ISth

12 Avenue?

13 MX. LIGHT: Excuse ••. By 'you*, do you

14 aean Industrial Tectonics?

is MR. BAKER: I Mean, hia, Mr. Licht, as opposed

16 tO ——

17 THE WITNESS: Physically, I did very little

is out there. I would go out to the site occasionally

19 to see that things were going along, that the site

20 was being maintained in a resonably neat condition,

21 as neat as it could be for the operation. Made

22 sure that if for some reason, for shortage of

23 personnel or whatever, that a load or two in

24 excess of their handling capability started to

25 accumulate, that the dispatch office was told to

30

r-

o

1

2

3

4

5

S

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

be sure that incoming loads were deferred for a

couple of days to Bake Bare that there was no

acctunulation on Bite. We felt there had to be

a few hundred drums on Bite as • backlog, but we

did not want to Bee any vaat accumulation of

fresh material on Bite. We wanted in and out.

Bow long did this operation function along these

lines?

Well, from October — November of 1977 until the

end of June of 1978.

Ton have any idea of how many barrels a month or

a week you handled during this time period?

I don't really, Mr. Baker. Z have records on

that, and now that our bookkeeper ia back on the

well list, we will have these lists within two

or three days.

Could you tell me what type of records were

generated concerning the input and output of this

site?

Yea. Certainly the most important record was one

where we invoiced our customers, and there is

an invoice record of every load that was received.

In addition, there were most of people there

were pickup ticketsr however, in dealing with the

truck drivers that we were dealing with, -we were

o

2

3

4

5

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

aA.

31

dealing with, we ware not always able to get them

to perform your paperwork chorea correctly. So,

we did not always get pickup tickets returned

nor did we get the bills of lading returned as

we should.

By what aeaas of barrels arrived on the site?

They were picked up by our truck drivers and a

van type seal-trailer at the customer's plant and

delivered to Gary. They were unloaded by our

people.

What trucks did the delivery? What trucks did

the delivery?

The van was owned by us. The tractor was owned

by another company, and our driver drove it.

What other company owned that?

One of the vans was —• well, occasionally we

rented vans froa people. Like I mean, trailers

froa tractors from people like Ryder or Transport

Pool or Kenworth, and occasionally we rented a

tractor froa By-Product*. The vans were our vans.

And these records of leases and rentals are

maintained in your files?

Yes, sir, substantially so. This stuff with

By-Products might have been a little too informally

handled. The other things weren't.

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

&

A.

a

A

a

A

a

A

ftA

a

A

32 I|

These files reflect that the work was for your

chemical division of Industrial Tectonics as

opposed to your design?

Yes, because the design division has never rented

any trucks, trailers — had no reason to.

The design division would never receive the

material that were being received at 15th Avenue?

No. Our offices at that time were over in

Haamond on Hohman Avenue, and I don't think that

we would have been able to receive then or unload

the* there.

Was there any other area anywhere that you re-

ceived this kind of material that was received

at 15th Avenue?

Ho, sir.

How, you indicated previously, I believe, that you

received a shipment that had lacquer and water in

it?

Yes, sir.

What was done with that?

It was mixed with the other material and taken

off to the landfill.

Did you ever receive any other material that you

thought was incompatible with your operation?

On one or two occasions and occasional dram was

1

r3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

0

A.

I

A.

a

A.

ft

A.

brought in that did not appear to be appropriate

and was put back on the truck for redelivery. In

fact, our drivers never brought In inappropriata

material. Occasionally customers would bring

material* in.

On some instances,customers would actually bring

the material to your site?

Tea.

What customers were that, if you know?

Well, there was Consumer Paint in Gary. There

was a company oat of Michigan. The name is Rozima

who were basically functioning as a disposal

operation in Michigan, but had no hone for the

paint sludge material they handled. So, they

would bring it in to us, and we would bulk them

and ship then off to the landfill.

Did either of these companies bring you inappro-

priate material?

Occasionally, Roiima would have drums and take

them back with them.

Did you or your employees as far as you know re-

ceive a drum that was inappropriate to you and

dispose or place on the site?

The instructions that we gave to our employees —

and the instructions were beaten into their heads •

1

r 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13o15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

JL

ft

A.

ft

JL

A.

34

that if there waa a question about something that

thay waran't sura to call and lat me or one of

the supervisor* know. We did not want to foul

up that Bite. It was bad enough.

As far as you know, were your instructions followed?

Tea, air.

So, as far aa you know, there waa no drum of in-

compatible operation was ever received by your

company put anywhere on the aite?

That ia ay understanding and that is my belief.

You indicated your operation operated fairly

aaoothly some tiae in October to aomewhere in

June?

Until the end of June.

MS. LIGHTt Of 1978.

MS. BAKER: Q Of 1978, and then what happened

at that point?

In June of 1978, the legal landfill had been

accepting our alndge bottoms and ao forth, advised

us that they would be unable to accept materials j

for a abort period of time nnleas they got them-

selves reorganiied in their operation. They

apparently had a couple of fires at their landfill,

CID Waste Management, and they were examining how

they were going to handle this situation since

o

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

o

JLa

JL

aJL

aJL

ftJL

ft

JL

ft

35

they ware dealing with not only materials that

they ware receiving from us but from three or

four other people and materials that they were

receiving directly from source*.

Now, you were sending out two different kinds

of material, is that correct? Liquid in the

tanks, where was that going?

CID landfill.

I thought, that was — what did you do with the

recoverable sale?

The recoverable was being shipped to a company

in 0'Claire. If it was a straight solvent, that

was being shipped to Waste Reclamation Research

in O'Clair, Wisconsin.

And how was it getting there?

It was being delivered in tanX trucks.

By what carrier?

By-Products Management.

By-Prodncts Management?

Would deliver it. They were paid for the freight.

Okay. Are those records of shipment to O'Clair,

Wisconsin, maintained in a file?

Tes, sir.

What documents were maintained and generated

relative to these shipments?

c

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

a

A.

aA

aA

a

A

aA

a

A

36

There ware — thara waa some typa of shipping

papar. Ma did not invoice thaae paopla. They

•ubaittad a report to ua of tba analyaia of tha

material, and than aant tha check along with tha

analyaia.

Did tha aaalyaia include the volume -- any re-

ference to the volume material yon received?

Oh, yea, abaolutely.

and they would pay you for that material?

Yea.

By check?

Yea, air.

The check would be returned caahed or negotiated

through a banking channel?

They would be depoaited to the bank.

Are recorda of that depoaita maintained?

Yea.

And account entriea poated for accounta of the

money?

Yea. And in addition, occaaional druma of materials

auch aa fraon or triehlore arrived on the aite,

and theaa were accumulated until perhapa 20 or

30 would be found; and they would be shipped and

aold to a company in Milwaukee. Bydrite,

H-y-d-r-i-t-e, I think. It'a Hydrite Chemical in

o

37

1 Milwaukee, Niaonain. There again, this atuff

2 waa reported back aa active component* in volume,

3 and they war* paid — it waa paid on the baaia

4 of they are raclaimable components.

5 MR. BERMANi What'a the chemical name?

6 I wanted to gat the chemical name.

7 THE WITHBSS: Tricloridea. It* a a ataudard

8 dry cleaning solvent, whatever that particular

9 ia.

10 MR. BAXXR: Q From whom would you receive

11 that?

12 A. Many of the cpmpaniea that applied painta would

13 uae thia type of paint for certain typaa of

14 cleanup, and they would keep them separated be-

15 causa of their owa internal problem of mixture

is and ao forth. So, wa would almost always when

17 we saw a dram that aaid freon on the outaide of

18 it without fail whan it waa checked, it waa holding

19 fraon.

20 (X Freon ia a aolvant?

2, «. Yea.

22 ft They were naing in some capacity other than re-

23 frigeranta?

24 i. Yea, air.

25 ft -Ia that flammable material?

o

t

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

aA.aA.

a

JL

a

JL

a

JL

a

38

HO.

Bow about tba other?

No.

The dry cleaning fluid?

Triclore i« not flammable, no.

Okay. In addition to these two chemicals, did

you ever receive anything at the site that you

kept other than the freon, the dry cleaning fluid,

and the paint solvent material that yon talked

about?

Ho. He really dida't keep those. We stored those

on short term basis, processed then, and sent out.

By keep, I Bean return to the person whoa you got

it.

No, no, not to uy knowledge.

Okay. So, you didn't dispose of anything through

this operation other than these materials?

I'm trying to recollect, Mr. Baker. Whether there

was, I don't recollect. When we dissect these

records, all our invoicing, and so forth is

sequential numerically there will be a record of

one point to another point so we will be able to

show you exactly what cane in and what went out.

Okay. Other than the company to whom you sold

the freon and dry cleaning material and the O'Clairs,

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

ft

L

ftX

ft

JL

ft

».

39

Wisconsin firm to whom you sent the recovered

solvents, did you sell any material out of that

•it* to anyone?

Tec. In addition, there were a number of drums

of off-grade lacquer — varnish not lacquer —

varnish that came into us. This material was not

good enough for a normal paint manufacturer to

be able to utilize, however, some secondary

operations found that this stuff was acceptable

to use as a paint base; and in fact, we sold a

number of hundreds, and I don't remember the

exact number, .but quite a number of hundreds of

this drum of off-grade varnish to a steel drum

reclaiming company here in —

Who is that?

Calumet Container.

Do yon know who the principals are in that company1

A fellow named John Jacklia, J-a-c-k-1-i-a.

Any other material sold by your organization by

this site other than those materials you just

described to us?

Hot to my recollection, Mr. Baker.

Mere you able in your solvent recovery process

to totally empty drums?

No.

G

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

A.

ft

JL

ft

A.

ft

»•

ft

' JL

ft

JL

ft

40

So, yon never sold any drums to them?

Drums war* sold. Oh, of course. Thank you.

Emptied drums were sold to on* drum

reclaiming company in the city. Acme Barrel Compan;

What city, sir?

Chicago, sir.

Over here we do not refer to that as the city.

Me emptied -- when we emptied the drums, in fact.

Acme Barrel maintained a trailer on site -- their

trailer — and we would fill the trailer up with

varying numbers of drums ranging from about 230

to 250 or so drums on each trailer.

Did you receive money on a per drum basis from

them?

Tes.

Did they generate any record to you that indicated

the number of drums they received from you?

Tes, they did. They didn't pay us for all the

drums they received, but — so that what they did

was, for examplet we would ship 242, and they

would decide us to pay us for 220; and they would

only indicate 220 on the check stub or whatever.

So, their records would differ from yours?

Would not coincide.

Would not from your company?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16i

17

! 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

0.

».

a

JL

a

JL

a

JL

41

In fact, I had a meeting with tha vice-president

of the conpany at ona point whan they wara ahaad

of u« by many, many hundreds of drums — several

thousand, in fact, and aat down and had to hava

a nerve to narva dabata with then ovar tha fact

that wa wara baing abuaad.

Did you ganarate any internal memorandum with

Taotonica Chemical Division referring to this

problem that they were performing?

I'm certain letters were sent there. We would

invoice the* for the drums. They would not

necessarily pay us for what wa invoiced.

Did you write letters complaining of this problem

that the letters did not correspond?

•rote letters and finally negotiated a meeting

and settled for part of the way — for part of

the total amount that was due.

So, you then received a check that received a

portion of the check between your invoices and

their payments?

Right.

Okay. Could you tell me what records were created

by the sale of the —• I believe, it's varnish you

testified?

Varnish that was invoiced out to Calumet Container.

1

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

• ' 25

ft

i.

ft

A.

ft

JL

ft

i.

ft

*•

42

There were times they came to pick stuff up

and times we delivered.

In what condition was that material delivered to

that company?

It was in 55-gallon drums.

Just as received?

Yes. It was cheeked and then closed up again

and then as received.

Does your invoice reflect accurately the number

of drams that were supplied to you by that company*

Uh-huh.

And do their invoices or records reflect that

account of drums they received from you?

Well, since they haven't paid us for a number of

them, Z can't say. There is about 100 — I've

forgotten. It was either 160 or 240 drums that

were shipped for them and not paid for and

correspondence back and forth and nasty notes and

so forth and not have been paid.

So, there again is a difference between what you

were paid for the number of drums you were paid

for and number of drums your records reflect of

drums that were shipped to them?

That's correct. But other correspondence indicate:!

that we were complaining to thea, and in fact.

43

r

o

12

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

that they did not pay UB.

Q Does your documents you racaivad from your cus-

tomers supplying you with tha wa«tn materials

you wara processing raflact in any way, shape,

or for* tha number of barrels?

L Ya>.

ft That you supply you?

i. Thay not always did. Our customers indioatad --

suppliad us with piacas of papar with thair

generations, bat oar driver had a pickup tiokat

and a multicopy fora whara ha was sapposad to

leave one copy at tha dock and bring back a copy

with tha load.

ft Okay. Would that document be signed by any re-

presentative of tha company from whoa tha —

JL It was sapposad to be, yas.

& It did not always occur in practice?

JL You're dealing with people on shipping docks and

truck drivers, and it isn't always —

ft Bo, sometimes you would have no document either

acknowledged by tha company or generated by the

company reflecting —

A. Tha acknowladgaaant would ultimately coma in the

fact we would gat paid.

0. Hare these payments from tha input put into your

c

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

a.

ft

A.

a

A.

ft

A,

a

A.

ft

A.

ft

44

operation agreed with your account made by your

truck driver*?

Uh-huh.

So, the input record* would accurately reflect

what you received in correspondence of your re-

cord* and their*?

Ye*, *ir.

Now, the other Batter of thing* went out — one

of the other wa*te thing* that went out wa* in

bulk of quantity of recovered solvent* or were

they in barrel*?

Mo. The reclaimable lolvent* went out in bulk.

In bulk, and that wa* hauled by By-Product* truck*,

i* that correct?

I think, alnoct all the time, ye*.

How were you able to determine the gallonage of

recoverable solvents that went out any one parti-

cular shipment, *ir?

We would depend on the people at the far end who

ran it through the metar.

And they would run it through a meter and an

analysis and *upply you with a record, and that's

what yon relied on, what went out in that area?

Ye*.

Another way material left there wa* in more or lesa

1

i 2\

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16s

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

aA.

a4

a

A.

a

JL

45

liquid sludge that did not include recoverable

solvent*, is that correct?

Correct.

Bow was that transported?

In vacuum tank trucks.

Did you own one of these, or did someone else?

No. These were owned by Scrap Haulers, Incorporated.

I believe, they're out of Riverdale, and we paid

then for the oost of transportation; and at one

point, we paid them also for the dump charge,

but after we got ourselves established with CIO,

they didn't have it carried through their books.

They weren't marking it up any, and we paid them

for the freight and paid CID for the dumping

charges.

Did you have any contract reduced to writing witb

either the dnnp or the hauler?

No. The only thing we had with the dump were

permits that were issued by appropriate authorltien

in Illinois.

Did you ever receive a contract with the dump

for receiving your material?

We talked to them many number of times, and they

said that they did not have contracts with people

such as ourselves. We don't know whether they

r

46

1 had contracts with direct source customers or not.

2 9. Bow were you able to determine the amount of material

3 leaving your site by tbe method of these vacuum

4 trucks?

5 A. The vacuum trucks were filled approximately full

6 so that —

7 ft Excuse me, sir.

3 (Whereupon their was a briefpause in the proceedings.)

9

10 THK WITHBSSi My response is this. Obviously,

11 we didn't want to pay for any more than we were

12 actually getting out. So, we- responded to our

13 supervisor on site that the truck was essentially

14 full. The actual capacity of the truck was approxi

is mately 6400 gallons, and our — the arrangement

16 with CIO and with the hauler was that if it was

17 a full track, it would be counted as 5,000 gallons

18 because there were times when they would be a

19 little under. I was told by our supervisor that

20 almost all the loads that went were full to the

21 brim and therefore held S3, 5400 gallons.

22 We were only billed by 5,000 by Waste

23 Management. We were only billed $5,000 even if

24 it ran 4800, we were still billed 5,000. There

25 was no way to meter this material. No point in

1

/ ̂ 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16

17

I 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

0

A.

ai.a

A.

47

trying to weigh the truck in and out because vary-

ing material would have varying density, so there

vac no real feasible way to Bake sure but eyeball

to make sure the truck was as close to full as

they would get it.

Were the drums that left there too the Acne drums?

Acne Barael, yes.

were they counted by your employees?

Tea.

Old yon receive any documents to whom the truck

you sent the drums to reflect the drums they

received?

Well, as I told you, what we ended up with was

Acme always giviag us a lesser count that we

sent up there, and I know in one particular case,

they ~ I went into a truck that was about a third

loaded and took a count and then counted while

they had them accumulating material drums and

finish that truck. And I know that count was

accurate, and yet, when we got the record from

Acme, it was 20, 30 drums short and I called

up screeming bloody murder. And we said they

are not reclaimable and at least give us an

account and say you're deducting for something

rather than doing it this way. And I couldn't get

48

c

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ftL

that out of then.

Okay. Mow, the druma that went to the fr«on and

dry cleaning fluid, they were accurately accounted

Yea.

And you got aatisfactory corresponding coonta

back?

Not an awful lot of thoa«, Mr. Bak«r, but more

or la«« SUB.

Did anything go out of this sits through your

operation other than what we've talked about?

There were small numbers of drums that were —

where the materials were actually jelled in the

drums that were not ponrable, not deeantable,

not anything. And these drums were actually

shipped to a place •— a landfill in Rochester,

Indiana. They were not an awful lot of them.

How were they shipped there, sir?

They came and picked them up, and we paid them

so much for the pickup and the dumping charge.

Did they provide you with any paperwork reflecting

the number of drums they took?

We paid them oa the basis of the number of drums,

and I'm pretty sure that they didn't pay for

less than — I mean, they won't take more drums

than they got paid for. And we have, you know.

o

1 check oopia« and mo forth.

2 ft Going back to your customers, you indicated that

3 there was a multiple copy of a pickup ticket u»«d

by your personnel picking them up?

L Yes.

^ Most of the drams that cane in there, you picked

up?

. Tes.

I. Okay. What other documents were created by your

10 company a copy of which was kept in your file

11 pertaining to these drums that were picked up

12 from the customer*?

13 A. when the pickup was accomplished, the type of

14 material was Indicated on a receiving ticket.

15 » In other words, it was — in addition to the

16 pickup ticket, there was a receiving ticket?

17 A. There should have been a receiving ticket, not

is all the time but most of the time there was.

is There was a receiving ticket indicating reclaim-

20 able material, dumpable material and so forth.

21 ft And that would count the number of drums?

22 L That would count — well, most of the time Mr.

23 Robinson was not very good with arithmetic, but

24 most of the time it tallied out.

25 ft What other documents were generated?

50

o

When that information was brought back to tha

2 office and then an invoice was generated.3 ft What office ware the invoices generated out of,

4 sir?5 JL Those were generated out of the office which is

6 now at 414 West Lincoln Highway.

? ft Where was it then?

JL It was in tha basement of my home.

ft And who had prepared these invoices?

10 JL Delores Licht.

11 ft And is she any relation to you?

12 JL Yes, my wife. -

13 Q. is she an employee of Industrial Tectonics?

14 JL Yes.

ft Is sha an officer of Industrial Tectonics?

18 JL Yes.

what is her position with Industrial Tectonics?

She is the bookkeeper.

19 0, As an officer, what is her position different

20 than bookkeeper?

21 JL Yes, treasurer.

She also does the paperwork associated with tha

23 design division of Industrial Tectonics?

24 JL Yes.

25 MR. LICHTi fexcuse me. By "paperwork" —

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

a

L

aA.

ak.»X

ftJL

a

*.

a

A.

51

THE WITNESS« Accounting and bookkeeping

not secretarial type stuff.

Did you enploy any secretary for the design

division or use secretaries for Industrial Tectonics

or for the Chemical Division?

No. Industrial Tectonics payroll only had on it

the people actually oat on the site and Delores

Licht.

Bow about yourself?

no.

Ton did not receive any salary fro» this?

That's correct.

Were Mr. Tenny or Mr. Eagen paid by you?

No, sir.

Mr. Bagen was then never aneaployee of yours?

That's correct.

Did he do any work at the site on the 15th Avenue

in behalf of Industrial Tectonics?

In terns of physical effort at the site, never.

He would occasionally run errands, bring in payroll.

timecards so that paycbecks could be written out,

and sometimes deliver paychecks.

How many employees did you ever have at the sits

at one time at 15th Avenue?

Seven maximum»

1

2

3

4

5

7

8

9

10

11

12

13o15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

0.

A,

aA.

a4

a

A.

52

Sevan employees at one time?

Tea.

In what capacity did these employees vork?

One was Robinson, the supervisor. Another was

a maintenance man, and there were three men

working on the stock. But at any given time, one

or two were abaent. So, we might have seven

people in a given pay period, but usually, five

or six.

Who were the persons that drove the van or truck?

None of those. One of those people would be

the driver of a dump truck over to CID when the

dump truck was filled up with a couple thousand

gallons of glob. The non-ponrable material that

would be drives over to CID by one of those

employees, and in addition to that, we had one

other man by the name of Kelvin Mitchell, ST.,

who was a truck driver and who paid our pickup*

for na and so forth.

Mow, what physically did these men do at the

site?

All right. Physically, an inspection would be

made of a particular drum to verify what it waa,

and then the materials that were clean enough

would be decanted into the vacuum truck.

o

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A,

ft

A,

ft

A.

ft

A.

ft

A,

ft

A.

ft

53

Directly from the drum?

Wall, they would be poured into a — into a vassal

and then into the vacuum truck, into on* of those

cans alongside the dock. And then —

How big were these cans?

That was perhaps 1500 — 1500 gallons.

Is there a tank inside the dock itself or under th

dock itself with an access on the top?

Tes. That tank was for the ponrable sludging

material, the non-reclaimable material.

The reclaimable material then was poured into a —

Separate vessel.

Seperate vessel?

Yes.

And that was transferred up into the vacuum truck

owned by who?

No. That was then pumped into a — well, the

material would either be handled or a small vacuum

truck, you know, temporary storage, or say for

5,000 gallons accumulated, the materials would

then be pumped into a tank truck, a regular tank

truck, that couldn't stand a vacuum, and then

that was shipped up to Wisconsin.

Okay. The material was poured into this tank

and was a recoverable solvent. What was left in

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

1.

aA

a

A.

aJL

aA.

ft

JL

a

51

the drua then?

There was the sludging bottom material, which

would then be emptied into the below dock tank.

Okay. Would that totally remove the material?

No. You can never empty these drums completely.

What wa« then left with what was left on the

truck then?

It was sent on the Acme truck and sent up to

Acme.

That would be the whole drum?

The whole drum including the residual, whatever.

Mow, heavy residual, there maybe three, four

gallons on the bottom or might be a pint on the

bottom.

What was done on the bottom of the drum?

That was vacuumed out of the occasionally scrap

haulers. Their trucks had their own vacuum

equipment, then they would just Buck the material

out of that tank and into the truck.

And was that the operation that was done on every j

drum containing recoverable solvents?

Tes. Well, there were some drums that were —

well, yes, on the recoverable solvents. That's

right.

All right. Were there other drums that were

1

2t

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13o15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

A.

ft

*•

ft

A.

ft

55

handlad differently other than those that were

baaically sealed up and sent on to the freon and

dry cleaning place?

No. The staff that looked like it was reuseable

like the varnish or — it was sold to Calunet

Container. He opened up many drums of a shipment

where they were literally sealed on the cap, and

we opened one dram to verify what it was and

assumed that the rest of them were like that one

drum. So, that it was varnish that was going to

dry and so forth/ and then —

Okay. Other than these drums that went out sub-

stantially the way they came in and the drums

yon talked about where you poured off the re-

claimable solvent and poured the sludge into the

tank at the dock, what other operations were done

with any type of drums at the site?

These drums with materials that were, you know,

jelled in solid.

What was done with those?

As I mentioned before, picked up periodically

by the landfill operator out of Bochester and

delivered to his landfill.

Okay. Again, these drums would leave your premises

substantially the way they came — the sane conditi >n

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

3

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

fti.

a

*•

a

»•aV

ft

JL

56

they cana in?

Yes.

How did thay gat to tha dump truck full of atuff?

Thara ara certain bottom aatarials that would

not pour, and yet, we couldn't take and lend 20,

30 gallona of glob to Acme Barrel. So, we would

•crape or let these drums *et on top of theae —

the reaaon we rebuilt thia dump truck after we

bought it was to get ourselves soae rails on top

so we could put the drua on top and let the stuff

oose its way out of the drua.

Into the duap truck?

Into the drvunp truck. It's one thing to send up

to the duap reclaiaar a gallon even five or six

gallons. It's another thing when you send them

half a drua. Be resents it.

Then what was done with these?

These were taken to CID Landfill.

Tour duap truck?

In our duap truck, and we were invoiced on what

we sent up there, and —

How did you determine the volume being sent there

in this Banner?

Early on in the game, they took meaaureaents of

the truck and agreed to a volume that was — that

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

57

was about what the truck held. Actually, the

truck bald a little bit nor* than — than we

usually shipped — a little bit more than we

were billed for, but one of th« fallows — it

might have been Eagen — want up thara and pro-

vidad than that thara is going to ba a little

bit of stuff laft on tha bottom so that tha

actual capacity wa wara billad for on that truck

was approzinataly 10 yards of material, and tha

truck actually bald 12 or 13 yards.

MR. LIGHTi Cubic yards?

TBE WITNESS: Cubic yards of material. And

ha, our drivers, wara instructed to ba sura that

they took along a ho* and, you know, raka tha

thing down, make sure that wa didn't and up taking

tan yards out up thara and bringing five yards

back.

MR. BAKER: Q What records, if any, ara

maintained in tha files of Industrial Tectonics

according to these?

Invoices from CIO. There was supposed to be bills

of lading and so forth, but they didn't always

gat generated. But you can believe the bills from

CID came through.

And there would ba a corresponding check Industria

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

t22

23

24

25

8.

ft

*

ft

*•

ft

A.

58

Tectonics paying that bill?

Absolutely.

Hare there any wastes taken to any other place

other than those that you mentioned?

I don't recall, Mr. Baker. When I 90 through the

records over this weekend and into next week, I

will and as we make those necessary tabulations

for you, I will be able to tell you precisely. I

don't recall any, but I can't say with absolute

certainty that anything ever happened. I didn't

see every invoice that went out. I didn't see

every billing ticket. You know, I can't say

that I saw, but maybe the majority of these things

Were any drums taken to any place other than

some waste disposal company or some chemical

company or some container company somewhere?

MR. LIGHT> Yon mean, other than Acme, is

that your point?

MR. BAKERi 0 Ho, other than barrel recovery

place or some other company?

Well, there were some drums that went to landfill.

Some went —

To improved landfill?

Yes. Either CZD or this place down in Rochester.

The stuff that went to Rochester was always the

1

r- 23

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13oIS

16

17

|

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

aA,

a

A.

o

*

a

A,

a

A.

59

jelled material. Th« stuff to CIO would not —

it normally would not take drums to CIO, but not

to say that occasionally a drum didn't and up

at the bottom of that dump truck.

Okay.

When I say 'occasionally*, I'm not talking about

any significant number, but —

Are there any other place* other than CID that

that bulk sludge went to either by dump truck or

vacuum tank?

No, I'm not.

Would you believe all that material that left that

site went to CID or some other approved landfill?

Went to either CID or CID because that was the

only place our drivers were to take the stuff. I

had no control over scrap haulers, but I know,

I got scrap haulers from — for freight and CID

for dump.

So, the only place your drivers were to take the

sludge was to CID?

That's correct.

The driver's did not, though, make records for

every trip even every trip they made to CID?

There were supposed to be records, but I will not

guarantee there was a record for every one. But

O

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

60

I mean. Instructions to those people out there

where it didn't make any difference if we lost

our fanny on a particular load. It was knowledge

that it was to be done right or they were fired.

A* far as you know, your instructions were followed?

As far as I know, they were followed.

That business in O'Clalr, Wisconsin, was the only

site you took the raclaimable solvents that were

generated?

That Hydrite for other reclaimables. Solvents —

the chlorinated material such as freons and so

forth, which were reclainable solvents went to

Hydrite. Other reelaimable solvents went to

O'Claire, Wisconsin.

Okay. The material that went to Hydrite went to

them in substantially the same fora as it was

when received by you?

Tes. We night end up with two half drums narked

parachlore, and we would then decant one into

the other. There was no particular benefit as

to sending them a second drum. It would cost us

a drum and so we would, you know, condemse these

things. There was no sense in sending 50 drums

of which half were full and half were half full.

Did this combining operation leave a drum with

61

o

any residua in it?

No. Or if there were any residues like there

•ight be some sludge — I never saw it, but

I'a surmising — there might have been some rust

or something like that became baaically thi« is

what this stuff i« used for that would end up

at the drum reclaiming plant; and they would wash

8 it out and handle it along with their normal

9 sludge disposal problem*.

10 a Mr. Liaht, I hand you what has been marked as

11 Deposition Exhibit 2 and ask yon if yon can

12 identify that?.

13 A. Tes. It's a photograph which appears to en-

14 compass a portion of the site on 15th Avenue.

is ft Okay. Does that depict Blaine Street we talked

16 about previously?

17 *. Yes.

18 ft Okay. What is Blaine Street on that? Is that

19 Blaine in the upper part moving from right to

20 left?

21 A. It's the unimproved dirt road appearing on the

22 top part of the photograph and in down on a

23 slight diagonally.

Does the concrete dock appear on this photograph?

25 A. Yea.

c

1 ft Where is it located?

2 A. It1! located approximately one-and-a-quartar incha

3 down from the top of the photograph and approxi-

4 mataly three-and-a-half inches from the right-hand

5 aida of tha photograph.

e ft Okay. Can you give m« tha location of approximate

7 what drum*, if any, on this site were from the

8 operation of Industrial Tectonics?

9 A. Tes. The drum* that I'm sure that were part of

10 what we put in there are the drams that are

n immediately adjacent to that dock — immediately

,2 to the west of the dock. There is another group

13 of drum* —-

14 MA. LIGHT>• Excuse me. Would you establish

15 the direction of this, please?

le THE WITHESflt Blaine Street is — sectionally

17 runs north and sooth. The left-hand side of the

18 picture is north. The right-hand side of the

19 picture is south. We are looking from west to

20 •»«*•

21 MX. LIGHTi The top of the picture is east,

22 and the bottom is west?

23 THE WITMESSi Right. The left is north and

24 right side is south. Tes.

25 MR. LICET: Thank you.

o

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

63

THE WITNESS: There im a group of drum* that

are set in a curved linear fora on the right-hand

portion of the picture, which are drums.

ME. BAKERi Q What i« contained in those

drums, if yon know?

Some of those drums, I know, contain a mixture

of aolvents and acrylic plastic.

Does that differ than the material you normally

receive?

Tes. There is one grouping — and I'm not sure

that is entirely that material there — but

there is one group of material which is about

800 drums which were obtained from a chemical

company that advised us first of all that the

material was resaleable but couldn't go selling

the second grade material. And it — if not

reclaimable, it was — was very readily distilled

to resins — separate the acrylic from the solvents

and both the solvents and acrylic resins would

be highly soluable.

As far as you know, those drums appear to be

intact and stacked in the lower right-hand portion

of this site depicted in the photograph that is

somewhat substantially or, well, perhaps an inch

down the picture from this' curve linear stack that

1

f" 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16*

17

I "

19

20

21

:22

23

24

25

i.

a

X

aX

ft

X

64

you showed u>. Are those drums from Industrial

Tectonics?

I think, those drum* ara left over from DeHart's

operation.

Now, the drums immediately to the left of that

curve linear stack are in the area of the dock,

is that right?

They are right behind the dock on the concrete

paved area.

In those drums (indicating)?

Are definitely materials we put in there.

How, the little stack that seems to go in exactly

east-west line — immediately to the north of

that stack and to the west, are those drums —

this little pale down here — they're stacked

approximately four drums wide, three drums high,

which are stacked in an east-west direction?

I'm not certain whether those are our drums or

not. As I indicated to you previously, as soon

as we have reviewed our tally sheets and records,

we'll be able to identify for certain.

I would point out that DeBart left

an enormous amount of the drums back in that area ••-

behind the area that we were working. Unfortunately,

we did not take pictures at the time. He anticipated

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

aL

65

being there six months.

Did yon or your employees avar decant DaHart'a

drumming proceaa through your operation for

whatever solvents could ba racovarad?

I'» aura we did clean up a few of hia drums be-

cauaa ha did not leave appropriate araaa in front

of the dock. So, I know vary wall wa had to

have diapoaad of a number of drum*.

So, there was some number of gallon* of solvent*,

some number of gallons of sludges, and some number

of drums sent to this reclaimer that would not

have bean covered by your customer invoices?

Taa.

And you don't know what that number is?

Mot very many, bat I can —- I'll try to find oat.

Z hay* no record of it, no, bat it cannot ba

vary much.

Did you make any arrangement with Mr. DaRart

concerning any of tha drums on the premises?

Was that expreasly covered by any agreement verbal

or written?

MR. LIGHT: You mean, tha drums that belonged

to DeHart?

MR. BAKER: Q Tha drums on tha side at

tha time your lease began, did you have an agreement

1

r~~ 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16

| 17

I 18

; is

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

ft

JL

a

i.0

A.

a

A.

a

•bout those drums with Mr. DeHart?

I don't remember any such agreement, Mr. Baker.

And I know that there is nothing reduced to

writing, and X don't recall any verbal agreements

with him. All that we proposed to do with that

•ite was to use it on the >ost temporary basis

until we were able to find another site and

get the necessary permits for setting up our

distillation.

As far as you kaow, did any of your employees

deal with the fire damaged drums on the site?

So, absolutely not. They had no reason to or

need to.

There was no need to increase your access to

operation?

Not to my knowledge, Mr. Baker.

No movement of any fire damaged drums were given

to yon? Ho instructions were given to your

employees?

The instuctlons were, 'Keep your hands off the

fire damaged drums.*

And as far as you know, your instructions were

followed?

They were followed.

You indicated, I believe, that this operation ran

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13o14

15

16"

17

s 1S

2 19

20

21

22

23

24

25

JL

aJL

ft

JL

a

JL

a

*

67

from October until approximately June with vary

little accumulation of drum* at the site?

Correct.

Ton indicated a couple of truckloads -- vanloads?

1mm, maybe.

Could yon give mm a number of drum* that would

encompass?

A typical load coming in would run — well, it

ranged anywhere from 20, 30 to the occasionally

80. But they would average in — probably in

the seventies.

So, would it be fair to say then that through

this time period from October 1977 until approxi-

mately Jane 1978 the accumulation of drum* through

your operation of the Bite would be approximately

160 plus whatever?

Mever more than a oouple hundred to 150 on the

outside.

Tou indicated when there came a time of that

operation changing in June of 1978?

June, 1978, Waste Management indicated that they

would be temporarily unable to accept the low

flash point materials from us and told us that

they would advise us in a short time — couple

weeks, three weeks — as just how they were going

o

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L

aA.

0

JL

68

to handle the matter.

What changes, if any, were made in your operation

at the 15th Avenue site?

At that point, we advised our customers that we

were unable to dispose of these materials because

of the problems at CIO and that as soon as we

had some response at CID that we would advise

them, and we also asked them not to send us

anything if they could possibly avoid us and asked

us not to pick up anything if they could possibly

avoid it. At that point, one of our major

customers disappeared never to be seen from again,

who was that?

Kustoleum Company, out of Bvanston.

Hot disappearing you don't mean it, though?

Old rust makes a lot of paint. We didn't See

any more paint from them.

MR. LIGHTi They ceased to be your customers?

THE WITNESSi Other customers held back

accumulating. Some companies were unable, and we

accepted some from companies that were unable who

were accumulating them.

Do you know what companies those were?

Those are listed, but I can't give them offhand;

but I can get then.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

a

9

10

11

12

13o14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

a

Jk

<x

JL

a

JL

£9

Did thoaa policies or method of operation change

again?

Tea, because wa kept badgering Waata Managaaant

for a response on whan, 'What can wa do? Will

you taka it in druaa? Will you taka it bulk?

Will yon do anything?" The response was to gat

put off further and further, and wa finally ended

up cutting back to the point of stopping tha

operation ooaplataly and loaing tha whola benefit

of tha custoaers liat we spent a whola lot of

ffloney for tha year before.

What tiBe period did yon obtain these aolventa

with tha acrylic raaina that are now stored at

this aita?

July or August of '78.

Did there coae a tiaa whan you began receiving

chaaicala at tha aita in anticipation of being

able to taka aatarial to one of your landfills?

Wa took the aaterial froa tha — froa tha acrylic

aatariala in on tha baais of tha fact that we

had decided that even though wa did not have a

proper site available to ua for our distillation

syataa, that wa none the lesa filed with both the

State of Illinois and the State of Indiana.

In the case of Illinois on a fictitious

70

o

1 »ita, that the site exists and sitting in an

2 empty building is for a sale but inappropriata

3 to our particular need, but nonetheless pat it

4 on that particular street corner and also took

5 with our management of ay-Products to put the

8 second operation to the State of Indiana basing

7 it on By-Produets Management site in Scharervill*

8 We filed that document with the State of Indiana

9 in early August of 1978, and when it became

10 very obvious that the landfill people were

11 playing games, and we filed about the same time

12 with the State of Illinois.

13 The State of Illinois rejected the

14 permits for a variety of reasons, and the State

15 of Indiana finally issued a permit the following

16 March of 1979. However, one of the provisos in

17 their permit to us is that we would have to get

18 approval of local authorities in Schererville

19 for building permits and so forth and so forth,

20 and Schererville would not issue the permit.

21 ft What operations did you anticipate in operating

22 on the acrylic material that you received and

23 stored at the site?

24 A. We anticipated that we would be able to put up

25 our distillation unit. Hopefully, put it up on

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

16

16

I 1B

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

A

a

A

aA

a

A

71

the back portion of the Schererville ait* isolatin

it from any of the By-Products building* or any-

body else*s buildings, and processing that as

the very first material that went into our still.

In other words, you planned to diatill this in

your still?

Sight, and the clean still was going to be

acrylio material because the information we

were told by the chemical company was that they

would be very interested in examining material

after it had been distilled with view of buying

back the resins.

Did your company perform any analysis or have

any alaysis performed on this behalf of the

material in these acrylics?

Ho, sir. This was a big national company,

and we presumed that they were going to more

or leas tell us the truth.

Mho was that?

Ashland Chemical, Calumet City.

Did yon perform any other analysis on incoming

material to your site or have it performed by

anyone?

Tes. Analyses were performed by CID laboratories

in order to get the permit.

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

JL

o

JL

ftJL

ft

JL

a

JL

ft

JL

aJL

72

That was on — want into tha company or what want

into tha waste aite?

Naate aita.

Right, but you parformed two othar taata from

what you racaivad?

Right. Tha only taat wa know wara performed on

what wa racaivad wara dona by Waata Reclamation

in O'Clair on solvent* that want to them, CID on

•ludga liquid, solid sludge want to them.

Some tasting en freon and —

By Hydrita, of course.

Are thoaa test results in your file along with

the invoices and bills?

Tea.

Mew. by Jane, 1978, you had exceeded the terms

of year initial lease with Mr. DaHart, is that

trua?

Right.

Did you oonaaquently enter into a second laaae

with Mr. DaHart?

We got a renewal of our first six-month leaaa

for an additional six months.

When was that?

Hell, actually after the data of the expiration

of the first leaaa, which is retroactive and

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

73

paid a couple month* back.

Did you deal with Mr. DeHart personally or vaa

this by latter?

MX. LIGHT: Do you recall?

THB WITNESS: Too know, I don't remember.

At on* point, he cane over to the — ay office

was in Haaaond, and at one point, he caae to

pick up BOB* rent check* but that auat have been

in January or February of 1978. I don't reaembei

•••ing hia after that.

Were all correspondence of Mr. DeHart aaintained

in the files of Industrial Tectonics?

Tes. Our correspondence of everything we sent

to hia is there.

Do you have any dealings with Mr. DeHart concerning

his other site for a siailar operation in Gary?

Never. Absolutely not.

Rave you ever been to that site?

Once. I went there soae tiae before his fire

when he was in operation.

Would it have been prior to August 1977?

I don't reaeaber when his fire was, but —

And what was the occasion of going to the site

at that tiae?

It was -— if you recall, I told you that Eagan,

74

r

O

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Tenny and I had talked earlier in the year, 1977,

about this operation, and I vent over to see

what it was that he was doing there,

ft "hat was the condition of the site at that time,

sir?

JL He had a reasonably neat appearing operation.

He had an enormous amount of drums stored out

in the back acres,

ft How tall were his drums?

JL Most of them were lined on the sides which is

not an improper way to store them. Host of them

were lying OB ,their sides, as Z recollect them,

ft Do you know whether or not he was pouring sludges

I from any of his drums on the back —• in the pit

of the back of that tract of 7400?

JL Z couldn't see any. Zt was up near his dock. Z

couldn't see what was there except in the front

Z could see.

ft Do you know if any drums or sludges on the other

side of 15th Avenue?

JL Ho, sir.

ft Was any type of activity conducted by your

employees?

Jk There was absolutely not. To my knowledge,

there was never any pieces, never anything buried

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

a

A.

L

ftJL

a

JL

75

on that site.

Was the second lease or renewal — the first

lease was reduced to writing as far as you know?

It seems to me, it was, but I'm not absolutely

certain of that. It seems to me that we had a

local counsel, William Horan, draw up these docu-

ments, and it seems to me that it was done on

a formal basis.

Kit. LIGHTi But in any way, you paid him

rent?

THE WITNESS! Tes, we did.

tat. LIGHTj And paid the rent for how long?

THE WITNESSi Six more months.

MR. LICHTt Tou don't mind the interruption?

KR. BAKERI NO.

Q You're still of the company is still on

the site?

Tes, sir.

When is the last time you paid rent to Mr. DeBart?

The end of the lease, October of '78.

When was the last time an employee of your company

or yourself visited the site prior to the institut.Lor

of this lawsuit?

Well, to my knowledge, there was no business

transacted on that site after January '79. It

76

o

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

aA.

a

might have been that a couple few loads were

brought in, but again, I can't pin down, you

know, when somebody might have gone over there.

Your records would reflect any shipment of drums

into that site to your company?

Yes. Yes, we would have invoiced those. He

would have invoiced the stuff that came in.

I believe, you described in detail for me the

procedure with respect to loads picked up by

drivers. Can you do the same for me for loads

directed by — loads directly to the company?

By the customers? Yes, there was to be a bill

of lading for the truck drivers and supposed

to be a receiving ticket for drivers from what

was on the load.

Receiving ticket would have been made out by an

employee on your site?

Yes.

Was that done in all cases?

I hope so.

If there was no receiving ticket or no bill of

lading, would there be any way the company could

be billed for that delivery of that material?

No.

Based on the receiving tickets that you did have

o

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

i.

ft

JL

a

K.

aJL

a

77

which may or may not reflect all the loads directl;

were bills made out to the companies who delivered

the material?

The invoices were submitted to people, and general:.y

speaking as far as I know, they were paid.

Can you describe for me, please, what kinds of

companies, customers, other suppliers that would

have received invoices from Industrial Tectonics -

excuse me, strike that.

You indicated, I believe, that your

company used numbered invoices, is that correct?

Yes.

Were these sequences unique for the Chemical

Division, or were they sequentially to the

Chemical Division itself?

Mo, the Chemical Division despite objection by

my accountant were kept completely divorced —

separate bank accounts, separate colored checks,

everything was maintained in completely separate

activity.

So, the Chemical corporation —

Division.

Division of your corporation whose sole place of

activity, whose office function of By-Products

may have been at 15th Avenue site?

1

c3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

014

15

16

17

I 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

aJL

a

i.

a

JL

aJL

a

A.

ft

78

Well, we did the same buainess of office sites —

Olympia Field, Chicago Heights. But as far

as being activitiea, physicial activitiea, of

that chemical, they were all accomplished at

the 15th Avenue site.

For whatever pickup delivery site waa?

Ho, to or from that site.

Okay. Could you describe for me the kind of

people who would receive invoices from Induatrial

Tectonica Chemical Division?

Certainly. A. American Can.

•o, I mean customers of waste recipients of

empty drums, gasoline companies, if you did that.

That's the kind of things I'm interested in.

I don't understand.

Claaaifications of people.

Nell, companies?

Well, yon would send invoices to all customera than

would provide you with the raw waste drums?

Tes, people such as the can manufacturing companian.

Okay. But the customers as — a customer supplying

druBS of waste is sufficient for that. You would

give invoices to all customers who would supply

you drums of wast-e?

79

o

1 A. Correct.

2 ft You would give invoice* to companiea whoa you

3 sent barrel* of the reclainabla material*?

4 MR. LIGHT: Solvent*.

s MR. BAKERi Q Such •• freon and the dry

cleaning fluid, correct?

. In aome of those caaea, my recollection ia — it

a waa little far back. My recollection ia that

9 waate Reclamation actually reported and aent ua

10 a check for what they read their analyaia metered,

and then there was no baaia for ua to invoice

,2 th*».

13 ft That waa —

. That waa reclaimable solvent*.

That waa reclaiaabla aolventa. Tou did not re-

16 claim aolvent* and — there waa no baaia. We

17 had record* of ahipment, and there nay have been

is an invoice there, but we could not invoice

19 becauae there waa no baaia for —

20 ft Did you invoice the company whoa you aent freon

21 and dry cleaning fluida?

22 A. No, air. We had to wait until they received

23 and sent a check.

24 ft You aent basically empty barrela?

25 *. *e invoiced them, yea. Same baaia.

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

aA.

aA.

ft

A.

»

A.

a

A.

a

A.

a

A.

ft

A.

80

I believe, yon disposed of some varnish products?

Varnish -- reuseable varnish that was invoiced

oat also.

That was invoiced out?

Calvuat Container in Banmond.

The other products that went out of there resulted

in invoices from you instead of to you?

Yes.

You had to pay for people to take this?

Correct.

Can you think of any other instance where you

invoiced some company on behalf of the Chemical

Division?

I can't. I'm sorry.

Anything else that would have been expenses to

your operation such as electricity or?

Oh, yeah, sore. There was payroll, power, fuel.

Ne were paying off some equipment that was

purchased.

Did you purchase any equipment from anyone other

than DeBart or DeHart's corporation?

Yes. Yes, sure.

What?

We purchased bulldozer« from Nackey Ferguson,

it was a frontend loader. We purchased a rebuilt

o

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

81

Bobcat which i» also a frontend loader from Atlaa

Material Handling. We purchased a couple of van

trailers from Pine Trailer Sales in Chicago.

MR. BAKERi Off the record.

(Whereupon, there was adiscussion off the record.)

THE WITNESS: There are obviously other

things there. There are tires and tire repairs

and a whole airad of things that one expects to

run money on in operating a business.

Is there any other office building or facility

of bailding maintained at this 15th Avenue site?

Tes. There were two van-type trailers, not, yon

know, vans without the wheels, you know, sitting

on their chassis that were on the site. One of

them housed sosie equipment, and one of them

housed the desk and heater and it was where we

had * telephone coming into the site and stored

things like gloves and boots, things of that sort.

Could you tell me where they were located in

Exhibit 2?

In Exhibit 2? The one trailer is still visible.

It is immediately east of the curve linear group

of drums and that housed the equipment. The other

trailer is no longer visible. It was located

o

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

82

in an area which is partially empty and partially

blocked by drums.

ft What happened to that trailer?

A. It was stolen,

ft When you say, "van", do yon mean an enclosed

bodied trailer, or do you mean a self-powered true)?

A. Ho, no. A van-type trailer. A semi-trailer,

ft Okay. Did you also have vans, meaning self contained

trucks like — milk trucks?

1. No.

ft So, when you say "van* throughout this conversation,

you mean an enclosed body?

A. 44 trailer, eight foot high — so many feet high

that is pulled by a tractor,

ft Thank you.

Do you know whether or not Mr. Tenny

was on this site during the summer of 1979?

i. I don't know whether he was or not, but I would

see no reason why he would have bean. I don't

know.

ft Were you aware of any activities of drums on the

site operated by Industrial Tectonics during the

summer of 1979?

A. Some varnish drums were shipped to, were picked

up, and delivered off the site to Calumet Contraine r;

o

83

1 but I don't remember the exact date. I could

2 find the invoice and tall you.

3 Q. So, someone from Industrial Tectonics moved drums

4 off the site to Calumet Container during the

5 summer of 1979?

6 A. I didn't tell you whether it was summer, but

7 some time in '79, yes. I recollect there was

8 some, and I can't tell yon how many. I don't

9 know if it was 20 or 80 or what number in-between.

10 ft Do you now remember any delivery of drums to

11 the site on —

12 A. Ho. If there .were any delivery of drums in '79,

13 very early ia the year, January, February, and

14 I don't recollect. We had no employees beyond

15 that period of time. Robinson at that time

16 had even left the By-Producta operation, as

17 I recollect, and I remember some conversations

is with Jack saying that he wanted

19 to buy some of the varnish, and I told him we

20 didn't have anybody to deal with it.

21 ft Other than yourself and your wife, who is the

22 treasurer of Industrial Tectonics and the book-

23 keeper for Industrial Tectonics Chemical Division,

24 were any other officers or — or employees,

25 officers of the corporation involved in the

o

84

1 Chemical Division oparation?

2 JL No. Tha only othar officer i* David Licht,

3 in hi* oparation —- and ha*a functioning a* an

4 officer of tha company and i* general coun**l

5 to tha conpany, bat all of hi* ar* New York

6 baaed until tha visit we made to tba aita

7 several waak* ago. H* had n*var seen tha oparation.

8 ft Ha had navar aaan tha *it* prior to th* institu-

9 tional lawauit?

10 A. That1* right.

11 (X Did any employee of your othar division of

12 Induatrial Taqhtonica parfora any work on bahalf

13 of tha Cha»ical Division?

14 »• Tha Industrial Tectonics employees are all tha

15 people that wa have talkad about — th* people

16 on th* sit* or Delores Licht. There ar* no

17 oth*r employees. Tha activities that are

is carried out under tha of Xnudstrial

19 Techtonics and th* equipment activities ar*

20 basically complimentary to the engineering

21 company that I own, and sine* we don't want to

22 run, for example, if a piece of equipment is

23 to ba bought for a company, an energy company,

24 we don't want to run through the engineering

2s company client's book*. So, we run it through

85

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Industrial Tectonics books for the clients and

Delores handled the paperwork.

So, other than you and Delores, there are no

employed by Tectonics Chemical Division for the

other division?

That's correct.

What happened to the equipment that Industrial

Tectonics purchased for this use of the site?

The dump truck is on site at the present time

or adjacent to it on the road. The vacuum truck,

the Bobcat, and the Caterpiller frontend loader

were moved over to the By-Product* management

site in Sohererville.

Are they being utilised by that company over

a day to day basis or being stored?

Basically, they are being stored, but, you know,

they use them sometimes -- from time to time.

Does that constitute the operational business

use by Industrial Techtonics of an Industrial

site?

The two vans are over at Schererville also.

There was a device for deheading drums that

was bought and never used that I'm — I'm sure

is over by By-Produats Management. I can't

think of other things. There are other things

o

1

2

3

4

5

a

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

a.ft

a.

fta.

fta.

»

a.

36

wa purchased by DeHart that wara actually navar

dalivarad, that wara actually supposed to ba

ours. Thara ara a numbar of tanks that wara

not on tha site that ha had somewhere else, that

ha was supposed to dalivar and navar delivarad.

Tha Chemical Division of Industrial Taehtonica

has axistad sinca some tine in '77 until today,

is that corraet?

Yes.

And tha records, checks, and so forth of that

division have baan maintained separately from

your other business?

Tas, sir.

And where ara they housed, sir?

414 Nest Lincoln Highway is where they ara.

And where within that site are they housed?

Within the offices of Industrial Tachtonies and

Charles Licht Engineering at the lower level

of the building there and they're in some file

cabinets.

It takes more than one file cabinet for the

records of this?

No, it really doesn't, but Dalores has tha files

in a number of drawers — in a numbar of, I

think, two adjacent file cabinets.

f~\

o

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

A.

ft

87

Apart from your permit application* and corres-

pondanca — your correspondence with the state,

various state agencies, your invoices, and

shipping records with your customers, the corres-

pondence with your O'Clair, Wisconsin, recipients

of the recoverable solvents, your correspondence

and bookkeeping antrias and invoices to the

Acme Barrel, your bills and checks paying the

bills from tha disposal and transportation companies

for tha disposal of tha material, your lease

with DaHart, and thraa bills of sale, tall me

what tha records of Industrial Tectonics Chemical

Division consist of?

Wall, there ara paid invoices for all tha equip-

ment supplies and miscellaneous activities,

insurance documents.

Payroll records?

Payroll records.

Employee records?

Employee records. Wall, I have those with me,

yes.

What else, if anything?

Wall, thera ara larga amounts of paperwork, and

frankly, Mr. Baker, I have not been in those

files for a long time. And I never really did

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

go in the file* with any depth sine* Delores

Licht is a vary competent record keeper and

bookkeeper, and I'm sure that the records are

there in totality that'* necessary to run the

business.

Did you ever have any relative of DeHart on your

payroll?

Marvin DeHart, Ernie DeHart'» son.

Could you describe hia for us, please?

Well, he's a younger version of his father. He's

short, maybe a little bit taller than his father,

•aybe five-seven. Probably weighs 165, stocky —

huskily built fellow, red hair, balding. I

really, you know, as far as detail of his eye

color or anything, I don't know.

Did he wear glasses?

Ho, I don't believe he did.

Do you know what occupations he had other than

working for you?

Well, he worked for his father for a while, but

they had their falling out and he worked for

us. He worked for By-Product* Management after

our operation had shut down.

Okay. In what capacity did he work for you?

He worked on the dock emptying drums.

1

2

3

4

S

8

7

a

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ft

A.

ft

A.

ft

A.

ft

A.

ft

*"

ft

*•

ft

A.

aA.

ft

89

Undar the supervision of Robinson?

Under Robin»on.

Bow long did he work for you?

Hot vary — three, four month*.

Did ha coma in at tha and of your enterprise or

beginning?

Ho, toward tha middle. Ha was not tha beginning

two, three months, four months into it that he

came to work for us and then left before the end.

Aad weat immediately to By-Products?

I don't remember if he went immediately to

By-Products.

Do yon know what other occupation he had?

Well, I just scanned his personal form a moment

ago -- a couple hours ago. Seems to me that

I recollect that he was high school education.

Is that the same educational background that his

father had or don't you know?

I don't know his father's background at all.

Was he married?

I believe, he was.

Do you know whether he had any children?

I don't know.

Do yon have his forms there in your files there?

Yes, okay. Yes, here it is. Yes, I have his

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

oA.

aA.

a

"•aA,

aA,

JL

90

forma, and I'm looking at both the application

for employment that ha filled oat on November 29,

1977, and also his withholding oartificata,

fadaral and state.

And what was tha data on thoee?

12-28-77. On tha fadaral, November 29, 1977,

and on tha stata, December 28, 1977.

How many dependents did ha list on there?

Three.

Anywhere on tha form does it list tha names of

those dependents?

Ho, sir.

Does it indicate tha age of those dependants?

No, sir.

Does it indicate tha aga of those dependents?

Ho, sir.

MR. BAKER: Off tha record.

(Whereupon, there was adiscussion off tha record.)

MR. BAKER: Q What association did Mr.

Eagan and Mr. Tanny have with Industrial Tectonics

Chemical Division?

Whan tha chemical operations ware established

basis for doing this was that Tenny and Eagan

were each going to put in an amount of money

91

1

2

3

4

5

S

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

and Industrial Tectonic* was going to put in

a slightly larger amount of the money to be

able to finance the initial purchase of the

customer list and certainly the equipment that

had to be purchased from the DeBart's or from

other sources.

What forar was this business to take a new

corporation or Industrial Tectonics?

Industrial Tectonics, I was presided to let

this industrial corporation to come in auspicious

of Industrial Tectonics simply because we know —

because we were going to have to go into the

outside investors to put in distillation equip-

ment and certainly strick the relative to blue

sky.

MH. LIGHTi Flooding of new capital.

THE WITWESSr Capital and blue sky laws

which were existing — seen low. It was not a

very positive corporation that would have more

laid on it. So, this is why

I was persuading Industrial Tectonics to become

the base for this thing.

Did Mr. Tenny put any money into this enterprise?

Mr. Tenny put money in. Mr. Eagan bought in.

How much?

O

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

a

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

oA.

a

A.

o.

A.

a

A.

92

They each put in about $11,000 — maybe a

little — maybe 11 or $12,000.

And Induatrial Tectonic* put in any money?

Induatrial Tectonic* aupplied a total of — well,

Delores Licht put in about 5,000 aa a loan to

Induatrial Teetonica, and then Induatrial

Tectonioa put in a total of about $20,000.

The agreement that waa never consumatad waa

that each of then were going to put in 15,000

and Industrial Teetonica waa going to have to

put the 20 in and after that, each would own

30 percent of .the company and I would retain

ownerahip of 40 percent of the company.

They paid that money in with no agreement

having been reduced to writing?

There waa an agreement that waa never aigned.

The agreement existed in an unsigned form in

Induatrial Teetonica?

Yea, air.

Bow much did you pay Mr. DeBart for the customer

liat?

The total amount of the money was — that waa

paid to DeBart waa something around 40 —

somewhere in the 40 plua thousand range.

MR. LIGHT: That would include also the

93

o

1 equipaent?

2 THE WITNESS: The equipaent and everything

3 else. Actually, we ran into a problea in

4 terna of custoaer list as to whether or not

s they are depreciable. In this question there

6 is nothing, bat it is. Bat oar accountant

7 felt that we should put in aore value into

8 equipaent than perhaps the equipment was 11-

9 terally worth and undervalue the eustoaer list

10 to be able not to get into a fight with the

11 IKS relative to depreciating the custoaer list.

12 And so that was what was actually accoaplished.

13 Soae of this equipaent was grossly overvalued.

14 ft What is your educational background?

15 A. I'a a graduate engineer. I've got a degree in

ie Technical Engineering froa the Massachusetts

17 Institute of Technology. I also have a business

is in engineering administration in tha saae school.

19 0- Can you give ae the date of those two degrees?

20 *• The Technical 1948 and Business Adainistration

21 degree in 1948.

22 MX. BERMAHi is that a Bachelor's?

23 THX WITNESS: Both are Bachelor's.

24 MR. BAKER: Q Do you have any post-graduate

25 degrees?

o

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

A.

ft

JL

ft

JL

ft

A.

ft

JL

ft

A.

94

No, sir.

What wa« your employment following your graduation

I worked for American Steel Foundries in East

Chicago, Indiana, for a abort period of time.

I helped found Sepprioy, Incorporated,

S-e-p-p-r-i-o-y.

What ia that?

Nickel and copper smelting operation in Chicago.

Does it exist today?

It exists.

Do you have any part of the operation today?

No.

MR. LIGHT: Off the record.

(Whereupon, there was adiscussion off the record.)

THE WITNESS: Sepprioy, Incoporated, I

worked for them from 1950 to 1953. I worked

for Apex Smelting Company, of very large

business for zinc and magnesium reclaimer.

And where was that located?

In Cleveland, Ohio, for a short period of time.

I worked then approximately 14 years in a

variety of both engineering and management

positions with the D.S. Reduction Company in

East Chicago, Indiana. And then in February of

95

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

1968, I left the U.S. Reduction Company. I

was vice-president for Engineering Technical

Service and set up my own counseling engineering

company and later incorporated and then a

year or so later, I set up Industrial Tectonics.

Does Industrial Tectonics have a private

for the year?

Yes. The company because of the — I advised

you earlier but not on this record, so let's

put it on the record.

Industrial Tectonics was originally

for the express purpose of air pollution

mechanics that I eould not get anybody in

the commercial world to invest in and this was

a unit of a type that was very, very advanta-

geous for the use and secondary low smeling

operation.

So, I set up the company basically

to provide this. Over the years we have

done other work. He have purchased equipment

for resale, some were working for a current

client, and we purchased it through there

without markup, but we are not dealing with

a current client or something that does not

relate to a current price. He take a reasonable

96

1 markup on these Items we retail — Cotec

2 Division has always shown a profit. The

3 Chemical Division has never. Unfortunately

4 my accountant was not willing to set up two

5 independent statements so that the audit for

6 the return for '77 through '78 and '79 will

7 show the combined, and I will — I will be

8 very pleaaed to insist that my account breaks

9 those apart for me and show what the Chemical

10 Division did.

11 0 Did you have some to put on any other annual

12 report on this profit and loss statement?

13 A. Hell, It put out no profit and only report

14 put out that goes to the IRS.

is & You were contemplating, I believe, taking out-

16 side financing for the chemical company?

17 *. Yes.

is 0> Did you make any report in anticipating of

19 seeking that financing?

20 *• Yes. There was a prospectus that was developed.

21 It's in the file. I would be pleased to

22 see to it that you have a copy, if you want.

23 MR. LIGHTi I may ask why you're asking

24 for this?

25 - M R . BAKER: Just —

97

o

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2G

MR. LIGHT: I merely mentioned it because

I know the aubjact matter of our lawsuit,

and while I'm not objecting to the answer,

you know, I question whether —

MR. BAKER: I'm just trying to find out

what records existed relative to the operation

out there to see whether or not they were

of importance to the invoices of income and

show the barrel and the amounts of the solvents

to any other place.

MR. LICET: How, I understand your point.

MB. BAXER: Q Do yon have any contractual

agreements which were reduced to writing

with By-Products?

Mo, sir.

Other than tlm lease of trucks, have you paid

money to By-Products for anything on behalf

of Industrial Tectonics?

I don't recollect, but it's possible that

we paid the lab for analytical work some time

or another. I'm not sure if it was done through

the engineering or Licht Engineering or if

was Industrial Tectonics. I know that we

ocassionally pay them funds, but I'm pretty

sure it was through — for engineering work,

98

o

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

for third party and not —

As far as yon know, did Industrial Tectonics

ever receive any drums at the site containing

cyanida?

Absolutely not.

Are you aware of any trucks having existed at

the site or having existed at the site contain-

ing cyanide?

I'a not aware of any cyanide at that site.

MX. BAXMi I have no further questions.

MR. LICHTi I have no questions.

I should like to read the transcript,

and after the transcript is read by »e, it

will then be submitted for signature by

Mr. Charles Licht.

(Witness excused.)

(FURTHER DEPONZNT SAITH NOT.)

99

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

C E R T I F I C A T E

I, Branda J. Cualler, being a qualified andcompetent shorthand court reporter, and being firstduly authorized to administer said oath, do herebycertify there appeared before me at 507 State Street,Hammond, Indiana, on the 4th day of January, 1980,the deponent, CHARLES A. LIGHT, who was thereupon firstduly sworn by ma to testify the truth and nothing butthe truth in response to questions propounded to saiddeponent at the taking of the foregoing deposition,relating to the above captioned cause now pending andundetermined in said court.

I further certify that I then and therereported in machine shorthand the testimony so givenat said tine and place, and that the testimony wasthen reduced to typewriting from my original shorthandnotes, and the foregoing typewritten transcript is atrue and correct record of said testimony given at saidtime and place.

I further certify that reading by the witnessand signature to the deposition were waived by theparties on the record.

Dated at Hammond,of February,1980.

Indiana, on the day

C.S.R.