1 how physical amenities relate to the mental well-being of
TRANSCRIPT
1
HowPhysicalAmenitiesRelatetotheMentalWell-beingofColumbusResidents
KoriGoldberg
Advisor:JeremyBrooks
SchoolofEnvironmentandNaturalResources
TheOhioStateUniversity
Spring2016
2
Introduction
The2014Gallup-HealthwaysWell-BeingIndexanalyzeddataconcerningthewell-beingof
individualsineverymetropolitanstatisticalareaoftheU.S.tolearnmoreaboutthe
nation’swell-being.The“happiest”metropolitanareastendedtobethosewithlow
unemploymentrates,lowpovertyrates,andwarmclimates.Unfortunately,Ohiohadtwo
citiesrankedinthetopten“unhappiest”areas,oneofwhichwasColumbus,whichranked
eighthfromthebottomofthe2014well-beingstudy.Ohiohasconsistentlyhadoneofthe
tenlowestscoresforstatewidewell-beingsince2008whenthestudybegan.Well-beingis
importantbecauseitisanindicationofindividuals’satisfactionwithlifeandhighlife
satisfactionencouragespeopletostayincommunitiesandhelpthemthrive.Inaddition,
policyexpertscareaboutwell-beingbecauseitisoneofmanywaystomeasureand
understandthesuccessandprogressofacommunity.
Well-beingisoftendescribedashavingmanycomponentsandthesecomponentsare
categorizeddifferentlydependingonthefieldofstudyandtheobjectiveoftheresearcher
(Layard,2010).Forinstance,VölkerandKistemann(2011)describewell-beingasa“a
complexmeasurablesubjectivestateofconsciousnesscomprisedofmultipledistinct
components.”Animportantcomponentofwell-beingismentalhealth.Researchthateither
directlyorindirectlyaddresseswell-beingcommonlyreferstothispsychologicalaspectof
well-beingas“positivementalhealth”or,asitisreferredtothroughoutthisthesis,“mental
well-being”(MWB)(Ruthetal.,2007).
3
MentalhealthisdefinedbytheWorldHealthOrganizationas“astateofwell-beinginwhich
everyindividualrealizeshisorherownpotential,cancopewiththenormalstressesoflife,
canworkproductivelyandfruitfully,andisabletomakeacontributiontoherorhis
community”(WHO,2014).Healthy,prosperous,andcooperativecommunitiesrelyon
mentallyhealthyresidentsbecausementalhealthdeterminestheextenttowhichresidents
cansuccessfullyovercomechallengesandcontributeeconomicallyandsociallytotheir
community(Galson,2009).Acomplexcombinationoflifestylefactorsandcircumstances
affectemotional,spiritual,andintellectualwell-being,orcollectively,MWB(Corvalanetal.,
2005).Inthisstudy,mentalwell-beingismeasuredusingfiveself-reportedfactors:
spiritualhealth,happiness,enjoymentofleisuretime,positivity,andlifesatisfaction.
Theassessmentofindividualmentalwell-beingiscomplexbecausemanyfactorshavebeen
foundtoaffectit.TheeffectsofdifferentlifefactorsonMWBaredifficulttomeasureand
disentanglefromeachother(DienerandSuh,2000).Someidentifiedfactorsthataffect
well-beingincludeincome,race,gender,andtypeandstateofgovernment(2000).There
aresomespecificfactorsthatconsistentlyshowrelationshipswithmentalwell-being;one
withsignificantpotentialtoaffectMWBisthephysicalsurroundingsofanarea(Jackson,
2003).
Promisingresearchatthenexusofenvironmentalpsychologyandurbanplanninghas
shownthatwell-beingandphysicalsurroundingsareaffectedbyeachother(Leeand
Maheswaran,2010).Threeaspectsspecifically,greenspace,bluespace,andwalkability
mayaffectMWB.Greenspaceisspaceinanurbanareacoveredingrass,trees,orother
4
vegetation.Bluespacereferstospacethatiscoveredbyorincloseproximitytorivers,
lakes,ocean,oranyothernaturalormanmadewaterfeatures.Walkabilityisameasureof
howfeasibleandcomfortableitistoaccomplishpedestrianactivitiesinaneighborhood.
Importantly,thereisagrowingamountofliteratureexploringtherelationshipbetween
suchurbanenvironmentalamenitiesandlevelsofmentaldistress(Whiteetal.,2013;
KarmanovandHamel,2008;VolkerandKistemann,2011).
Forinstance,high-quality,accessiblegreenandbluespacemaycontributetohigheroverall
scoresofcommunities’mentalwell-being(KarmanovandHamel,2008).Astudyonthree
communitiesinNewHampshirefoundthaturbanplanningpracticesthatleadtohigher
levelsofwalkabilityhaveimplicationsforhigheroverallqualityoflife(Rogersetal.,2010).
Asmoreresearchisexecutedandpublished,especiallyinareasliketheMidwestwhere
minimalresearchhasbeendone,plannersmaygainstrongerjustificationwhenadvocating
forhigherqualityandquantityoftheseamenitiesinurbanareas.Thisstudyaimstoshed
lightonseveralquestionsrelatedtoenvironmentalamenitiesandlevelsofmentalwell-
being.
1) First,doestheavailabilityofgreenspace(parks,cemeteries,golfcourses)inone’s
neighborhoodcorrelatewithoverallmentalwell-beingoraspecificmeasureof
mentalhealth(happiness)?
2) Doestheavailabilityofbluespaceinaneighborhoodcorrelatewithoverallmental
well-beingofresidentsoraspecificmeasureofmentalhealth(happiness)?
5
3) How,ifatall,doesneighborhoodwalkability(measuredassidewalklength)relate
tomentalwell-being?
Background
Boththenaturalandbuiltenvironmenthavedailyandsignificanteffectsonourmental
stateandbehaviors(Jackson,2003).Threeaspectsofneighborhooddesignthatmayaffect
MWBaregreenspace,bluespaceandthewalkabilityofthearea.
Thebiophiliahypothesis,putforthbyE.O.Wilson,suggeststhatinteractionwiththe
environmentanditslivingcomponentsisfundamentaltohumanwell-being(Wilson,
1984).Theauthorhypothesizedthathumansarepredisposedtoaloveoflivingthingsand
heteachesthatphysical,emotional,andphysiologicalbenefitsaccruetoindividualswho
haveanappreciationforandconnectiontonature.Furthermore,arelatedhypothesis
proposesthatgreenspaceinurbanareascanhavesignificanteffectsonthementalwell-
beingofpeoplewholivenearit(Fulleretal.,2007).
Inthefieldofcityandregionalplanning,itiscommonforpolicymakerstoregardgreen
spaceasaluxurygood,underestimatingthehiddenpotentialforgreenspacetopositively
affecturbanresidents(Groenewegenetal.,2006).Ameta-studyconductedin2010
concludedthereisalackofconcreteevidenceassociatingmentalhealthandgreenspace
despiteanumberofpreviouslypublishedstudies(LeeandMaheswaran,2010).The
researchersreviewedstudiespublishedafter1990withaspecificfocusongreenorpublic
6
openspacesastheyrelatetohumanhealth.Thiswasdoneinanattempttodevelopa
“narrativesummaryforhealthpolicy-makersandurbanplanners”(LeeandMaheswaran,
2010:212).Thismeta-studyfoundarangeofresultssuchasstrongsupportfortheclaim
thatgreenspaceoffersincreasedopportunityforexercise,whichinturnimproves
residents’physicalhealth.Asfortheconnectionbetweenmentalhealthandgreenspace,
thesestudiestendtorelyonqualitativereportsratherthanquantitativestudies.Positive
correlationsbetweengreenspaceandsocialcapital,senseofsafety,andreducedstress
werepresentedanddiscussed.Thesecorrelationswerefoundtobegenerallyconsistent
acrossthereviewedstudiesdespitedifferentlocationsandmeasurementtoolsusedby
researchers.
Greenspacehasbeenfoundbothtoreducestressandanxietyassociatedwithnegative
mentalhealthandalsotoaddpositivementalbenefitstothosewhointeractwithit(Van
DenBergetal.,2010).Studieshaveshownthatnearnessandinteractionwithgreenspace
canreducesymptomsofanxietyanddepressionandimproverecoveryfrommentalfatigue
(PearsonandCraig,2014).Researcherswholookedatindividualsmovingtogreenerand
lessgreenurbanareasfoundthat“sustainedmentalhealthimprovements”(VanDenBerg
etal.,2010:1247)wereassociatedwithindividualswhomovedtourbanareasthatwere
greenerthantheirpreviousneighborhoods(Alcock,2014).AstudyofDutchresidents
foundthatthepresenceofgreenspaceincommunitiescanmitigateboththephysicaland
mentalnegativeeffectsthatstressfullifeeventshaveonindividuals(VanDenBergetal.,
2010).Exercisedoneingreenspacehasbeenfoundtoresultinhigherratingsofmental
well-beingthansimilaractivityconductedinanindoorenvironment(Coonetal.,2011).
7
WhilesomerelationshipsbetweenMWBandgreenspacehavebeenfound,themeta-study
discussedearlierconfirmsthatcurrentevidenceandconclusionsinthisareaofresearch
arestillweakatbest(Whiteetal.,2013;LeeandMaheswaran,2010).
Inrecentyears,another,lesser-knowntypeofspacecalled“bluespace”iscapturingthe
attentionofresearcherswhobelievethatitmayhavebenefitssimilartothatofgreen
space.OnestudylookedathowthehealthofEnglishresidentsrelatedtotheirresidential
proximitytowater.Theresearchersfoundthatasdistancetothecoastdecreased,overall
healthincreased(Smedley,2013).Resultsfromthisstudyindicatedthatotherwater
featuresalsopositivelyaffecthealth.Aplausibleexplanationsforthisrelationshipfocuses
onthefactthathumans“evolvedinintimatecontactwithnature,anditisonlyreallyinthe
last200yearsthatpeoplehavebeenincreasinglyremovedfromnature“(2013).Humans
mayhaveaninnatedesiretobenearwater:“Thereissomethingdeeplyprofoundabout
waterandhumans,anditmayreflectevolutionaryhistory",marinebiologistAlisterHardy
hassaid(2013).Humanattractiontowatermayrelatebacktoandbeanextensionofthe
biophiliahypothesis(Wilson,1984).
Further,KarmanovandHamel(2008)foundthatbluespaceinurbanandnaturalcontexts
isassociatedwithmultiplepositiveeffectsincludingmoodenhancement,stressreduction,
andexpansionofmentalattention.Therangeofrecreational,restorativeandspiritual
benefitsofbluespacehavebeendocumentedonanindividualandpersonallevel(Völker
andKistemann,2011).Inastudypublishedin2010participantswereshownarangeof
8
120photoswithamixofgreen,blue,andbuiltspaceandtheirreactionstotheimageswere
recorded.Theresearchersfoundthatbluespaceinnaturalandbuiltenvironments
producedmorepositivesubjectivereactionsfromindividualsthansimilarareaswithout
waterfeatures(Whiteetal.,2010).
VolkerandKistemann(2011)lookedatliteraturerelevanttobluespaceandwell-being,
ultimatelyincluding36studiespublishedafter1981.Acrossthestudies,viewsof
landscapescontainingwaterwereconsistentlyreportedas“positive,attractive,and
fascinating”withtheexistenceofwaterfeaturesbeing“astrongpredictorofpreferencefor
landscapesingeneral”.Thispreferenceexistsduetobluespace’spotentialtooffer
refreshing,calmingandenergizingeffects(VolkerandKistemann,2011;Whiteetal.,2010).
Thereviewalsopointsoutfascinatingspiritualandemotionalreactionsbyindividualsin
responsetothepresenceofwaterintheirlandscapes.Studiesalsoexistthatquantitatively
supportthenotionthathumanspreferenvironmentswithwatersuchasa2000studythat
usedahedonicmodeltoshowthathousepricesnearwatertendtobehigherthanthose
notnearwater(Luttik,2000).Asarelativelynewfieldofinquiry,bluespacemayhave
intuitiveandencouragingbenefitsforallbutthereisanoticeablelackofresearch
addressingtheeffectofwateronurbandwellers(Luttik,2000).
Walkabilityofaneighborhood,inadditiontogreenandbluespace,mayalsoaffectthe
MWBofitsresidents.Walkabilityreferstothewaysinwhichthebuiltenvironmentenables
pedestrianactivities.Inthepastdecade,walkabilityhasreceivedincreasedattentionin
regardstoitsrelationshiptohumanhealth.Andrewsetal.(2012)note“aninitialscanof
9
theliteraturepublishedinSocialScience&MedicineanditssisterjournalHealth&Place
foundmorethanfortypapersthatfocusexclusivelyonwalkability”.Anumberofthese
studieslookedattheconnectionbetweenmentalhealthandwalkableareasandfoundthat
pedestrianactivities,facilitatedbyimprovedwalkabilityofneighborhoods,providemeans
forresidentstoexperiencearangeofpositiveemotions,includinghigherself-confidence
andothertherapeutic,spiritualandescapefulfeelings.
Likebluespace,researchintothebenefitsofwalkableneighborhoodsisanemergingfield
thatstillhaslimitedconclusionsbuthasexperiencedimmensegrowthinrecentyears
(Florida,2011).Citiesandneighborhoodswithhighlevelsofwalkabilityhavebeenshown
tofosterhighlevelsofsocialcapitalandcontributetophysicallyhealthyandmore
emotionallyrelaxedresidents(Abrahametal.,2009).
Inonestudy,researchersfoundspecificbenefitsofexerciseforpeople65andolder
includingbetterqualitysleep,delayedonsetofmanydiseases,improvedperceptionoflife
condition,andpositiveeffectsoncognition(SugiyamaandThompson,2007).Inadditionto
encouragingmorephysicalactivity,walkableareashavealsobeenassociatedwithhigher
levelsofcivicengagementandsocialcapital,bettercognitivehealthofresidents,andcrime
reductionincommunities(Florida,2014).
Scalesthatassessandmeasurethewalkabilityofanareamaytakeintoaccountawide
rangeoffactorstogenerateatruemeasurementofthewalkabilityofaspecificaddressor
10
generalarea.Commontechniquesusedtoevaluatewalkabilityarepresentedinthe
discussion.
Thoughthereareanumberofstudiesexploringthepositivementalbenefitsassociated
withhighlevelsofaneighborhood’sgreenspace,bluespace,andwalkability,muchofthis
researchhasbeenconductedinEuropeancountries.StudiesfocusedontheurbanMidwest
arefarlesscommon(KarmanovandHamel,2008;LeeandMaheswaran,2010;Abrahamet
al.,2009).Assuch,thisstudylooksatMWBscoresandbuiltenvironmentcharacteristicsto
exploreifandhowthesehypothesizedrelationshipsarepresentinneighborhoodsof
Columbus.
Methods
Theprocessofcollectingdataforthisstudycanbesplitintothreeparts.Collecting
informationregardingthedependentvariable,theindependentvariablesandthecontrol
variableswasdoneinseparateways.
I.Dependentvariable:MentalWell-Being
Dataforthedependentvariableofthisstudy,themulti-dimensionalmeasureofmental
well-being,wascollectedduringFall2015andJanuary2016.Thedatacomesfromasurvey
designedforabroaderstudyexploringtherelationshipbetweenconsumption,
environmentalimpacts,andwell-being.
11
Phaseoneofdatacollectioninvolveddevelopingawell-beingmetricforthecityof
Columbus.Ithasbeensuggestedthatacontextspecificmeasurementofwell-beingshould
beusedinthecollectionandcalculationofwell-beingscoresinaparticulararea(Corvalan
etal.,2005).Themetricusedinthisstudywasderivedfromfeedbackgatheredfrom
Columbusresidentsthroughtwointeractiveprocesses.Researchersusedfocusgroupsand
“streetstalls”toengagewithresidentstodeterminetheextenttowhichcertainfactors,
derivedfromtheOxfamHumankindIndex,contributetooverallwell-being(Walkeretal.,
2012).Anexampleoftheactivitydoneatstreetstalls,whereparticipantsrankedthe
importanceof19differentcomponentsofwell-being,canbeseeninAppendixA.
FeedbackfromColumbusresidentsresultedinafinallistof26factors,whichwere
categorizedintoseveralcategories;onecategoryincludedanyfactorsthatmeasuredan
aspectofthementalhealthofindividuals.Theprimarydependentvariableusedforthis
studyisanindexofthesefiveWBfactorsthatrelatespecificallytomentalhealth.In
addition,asecondaryanalysisusedasinglecomponentofthisindex(happiness).
PhaseTwoofdatacollectionwasasurveyconductedintwoneighborhoodsofColumbus.
ClintonvilleandOldeTowneEastwerechosentoexplorevariationintheirgreenspace,
bluespace,andwalkabilityaswellasfortheirsocio-economiccharacteristics(seebelow).
Withineachneighborhood,sixterritorieswereselectedbasedonboundariesofUScensus
blocks.
12
The“drop-off,pick-up”(DOPU)methodwasusedtodistributesurveystohouseholdson
threerandomlyselectedstreetsineachofthesixterritoriesofbothneighborhoods.This
methodwasusedbecauseithasbeenfoundtohaveahigherresponseratethanstandard
mailsurveysandbecauseoftheclusteringofhouseholdsintheterritoriestargetedbythe
study.InadditionDOPUhasbeenfoundto“offerpromiseforreducingnon-coverageerror
andpossiblesamplebiaswithoutsacrificingresponserates(Steeletal.,2001).
Researchersaimedtomaximizecontactwiththosesurveyedbyinitiallyonlydropping
surveysoffathouseswhereresidentsansweredthedoor.Respondentswereinformedof
thegeneralnatureofthestudyandtheimportanceofaccuratelyfillingoutthesurveysto
thebestoftheirability.Surveyswereexpectedtotakebetween15and20minutesand
respondentswereinformedthatresearcherswouldreturninseveraldaystopickup
completedsurveysthatcouldbelefthangingonthedoorintheprovidedbag.Onsurvey
visitstheresearchersalsoinformedparticipantsofanonlineoptiontocompletetheir
surveys.Eachofthethreestreetsineachterritorywasultimatelyvisitedfourtimesin
ordertogatheradequateresponsesandgivemultiplechancesforaresponse.Afterthe
fourthvisit,surveyswereleftatallhouseholdsforwhichtherewasatleastoneattemptto
contacttheresident(upto75householdsperterritory).
Thesurveycontainedquestionsrelatedtoenvironmentalbehaviors,well-being,and
demographics.Thewell-beingportionofthesurveyincludedthepreviouslymentioned26
factorsforrespondentstoratethemselveson.Thefactorswerepresentedasstatements
andrespondentswereaskedtoratethemselvesonascaleof1-7(1=stronglydisagree,
13
7=stronglyagree).MWBdatawascollectedfromsurveyresultsof271individualsacross
allsurveyedterritories.
AnalgorithmwasdevelopedtocombinethemetricdevelopedfromColumbusresident
feedbackinPhaseOneandtheself-ratingscollectedfromPhaseTwo.Thedatafromphase
onewasusedtoassignaweightingforeachcomponentofwell-beingbasedontheaverage
rankingitreceivedfromparticipants.Assuch,eachfactorwasassignedamultiplier
between.16and1.5toindicatehowimportantthefactorisasacontributortoColumbus
residentwell-being.Inaddition,thisweightingvariedbyagegrouptoreflectthelikelihood
thatthefactorsthatcontributemosttowell-beingchangethroughone’slifecycle(seetable
1).TheadditionalfactorsthatwereaddedafterPhaseOnewereassignedaneutralvalueof
.79(theaverageforthe19componentsincludedinthatstudy).Themultiplierwasthen
appliedtoeachrespondents’self-reportedscoresandsummedtocalculateafinalmental
well-beingvalueforeachterritory(seeAppendixB).Thefivefactorsthatrelatetomental
well-beingandtheirweightsareshowninTable1.
Table1.Mentalwell-beingfactorsandtheirweights
Factor Weightperagegroup
Onanaverageday,Ifeelmentallyhappy(happiness)
Age18-30:1.07Age31-45:1.07Age46-60:0.74Age61-88:1.09
Ienjoymyleisuretime
14
(leis.time) Age18-30:1.07Age31-45:1.13Age46-60:0.87Age61-88:0.75
Ihavegoodspiritualhealth*(spir.hlth)
Age18-30:0.79Age31-45:0.79Age46-60:0.79Age61-88:0.79
Iampositiveaboutmyfuture*(pos.future)
Age18-30:0.79Age31-45:0.79Age46-60:0.79Age61-88:0.79
Ifeelgoodaboutmyselfandmylife(feel.good)
Age18-30:1.02Age31-45:0.65Age46-60:0.74Age61-88:0.89
*=oneofsevenfactorsaddedafterfeedbackandresponsesfromPhaseOneofdata
collection
StudySites
BecausethetwoneighborhoodsstudiedinColumbusdonothavedistinctgeographic
boundaries,twozipcodeswereassociatedwitheachoftheneighborhoodsandthelimitsof
thesezipcodeswereusedtodefinetheneighborhoods.Clintonville(43214and43202)is
regardedasaprestigiousneighborhoodofColumbus,whileOldeTowneEast(43202and
43205)hasalessprestigiousreputation.Clintonvillehasbeenexperiencingrisinghousing
pricesinrecentyearswhileOldeTowneEastcontinuestoseehighratesofvacancy.Both
havesimilaraccessibilitytoColumbus’downtownandarewithinthe270outerbelt.In
15
termsofdemographics,Clintonvilleislargelywhite(91%“whitealone”)whileOldeTowne
Easthasamuchmoremixeddemographicmakeup(60%“whitealone”)(U.S.Census,
2010).Clintonvillehasahighermedianincome($53,112)andlessvariancethanOlde
TowneEast,whichhasalowermedianincome($35,499)andalargerdiversityofincome
levels.Blockgroupswerechosenwithinthesetwoneighborhoodsbasedoncensusdata
from2010toensurethattherewasdemographicvariation(specificallymedianhousehold
incomeandrace)betweentheblockgroups.Sixblockgroupswerechosenineach
neighborhoodtomakeatotaloftwelveblockgroups.Thesetwelveblockgroupsare
referredtoas“territories”throughoutthestudy.Finally,threestreetsperblockgroupwere
randomlychosen.Theterritories’locationsandsizes,aswellasthespecificstreets
surveyedcanbeseeninFigure1
II.IndependentVariables
Inordertogenerateandorganizethedatarelevanttothetwelveterritoriesandtheirgreen
space,bluespace,andwalkability(theindependentvariables),QGISandExcelwereused
extensively.Ultimatelyfourdistinctindependentvariablesweredefined:greenspace
acreage,percentagegreenspace,sidewalklength,andpercentagebluespace.Thevalues
fortheseamenitieswerecalculatedforeachofthetwelveterritoriesandaresummarized
intable2.
Greenspaceacreagereferstothenumberofacresofgreenspacewithinorintersectinga
territory’sone-milebufferzone.Percentagegreenspaceistheamountofspace(inacres)in
16
aterritory’sone-milebufferzonedividedbythetotalacreageofthatzone(zonesdiffered
insizebecauseofsmalldifferencesinterritorysize).Sidewalkwascalculatedbymeasuring
distanceofsidewalkwithinaterritory’sone-milebufferzoneinmiles.Bluespacewas
definedasanypointthatwaswithinaone-miledistanceofamainwaterfeature.
Percentagebluespacewasacreagewithinaterritory’sone-milebufferzonethatwas“blue”
dividedbythetotalacreageofthatzone.
Tobegindatacollection,publiclyaccessiblefilesfromtheMid-OhioRegionalPlanning
Commission(MORPC)wereusedtomapoutgreenspace.Thefileusedcontainsspatial
informationofgolfcourses,cemeteriesandparksinandaroundColumbus.Figure1shows
thebaselayersforworkthatwasdoneinQGIS.Territoriesinthetopleftcornerare
Clintonville1-6andtheterritoriesinthebottomleftareOldeTowneEast1-6.Thismap
alsocontainsMORPC’sopenspacedata(darkgreenareas),asidewalkinventory(with
thoseactuallyusedforsurveyingpurposeshighlightedinwhite),andthemajorrelevant
riversandtributariesthroughoutthearea.
17
Figure1.QGISmapofthe12territoriesstudiedandtheirassociatedgreenspace,sidewalk
andwaterfeatureswithsurveyedstreetshighlightedinwhite
ForeachterritoryIcalculatedthepercentageofgreenspacewithinaone-mileradius
aroundtheperimeterofeachterritory.TheanalysiswasperformedinQGIS.Aone-mile
bufferwasdrawnoutwardfromtheperimeterofeachofthetwelveterritoriesbecause,
18
althoughthedistancepeoplearewillingtowalkvariesbypersonandbytrip,studieshave
foundthatpedestrianswalkmuchfartherdistanceswhenthedestinationorpurposeisfor
leisureorrecreation(YangandDiez-Roux,2013).Thedistanceofone-milewaschosen
becauseitisestimatedtobeagoodrepresentationofhowfarpeoplearewillingtowalkin
ordertoaccessgreenspace(Iaconoetal.,2008,Donahue,2011).
Oncethebufferswerecreatedthegreenspaces“intersecting”or“contained”bytheone-
milebufferlayerwereselectedindividuallyforeachterritory.Greenspacesthatwere
withinthelayerwereclassifiedas“accessible”,aswellthosethatintersecttheone-mile
buffer,becauseitwasassumedthatifresidentscouldaccessanypartofagreenspace,then
thatentirespacewasaccessible.Figure2showsClintonville6(orange),itsone-milebuffer
zone,andthegreenspacethatiswithinorintersectingtheone-milebuffer(highlighted
darkblueareas).
19
Figure2.Clintonville6territory,one-milebufferzone,andassociatedgreenspace
Theacreageofeachbufferedareawascalculatedandthebasicstatisticsanalysistoolwas
utilizedtoconvertunitsandcalculatethetotalgreenspacewithinthebufferzone.Finally,
theacreageofgreenspacewithinorintersectingthezonewasdividedbythetotalacreage
ofthezone,resultinginagreenspacepercentageassociatedwiththatterritory.
Tomeasurebluespace,aone-milezonewasusedagaintodeterminehowmuchofthe
territory’sareaiswithinaone-miledistancetoariverortributary(spatialinformationon
waterfeaturesobtainedfromtheUSGSNationalHydrographyDataset,2011).Then,the
geoprocessingtoolinQGISwasusedtocreateanalgorithmtoselectonlyfeaturesthat
20
overlappedbetweentheone-milebufferedindividualterritorylayerandthenewwater
bufferlayer.AnexampleofthebluespaceassociatedwithaterritorycanbeseeninFigure
3.Finally,theacreageofbluespaceintheterritorywasdividedbytheterritory’stotal
acreagetogetpercentagebluespacewithintheterritory’sbufferzone.
Figure3.Clintonville1(darkpurpleterritory)shownwiththebluespacelayerenacted
(lightblue)andtheportionofClintonville1’sone-milebufferzonethatoverlapswithblue
space(teal)
21
Tomeasurewalkability,Icalculatedthedistanceofsidewalkwithintheone-milebuffer
area.WithinQGIS,theselectbylocationalgorithmwasusedtoselectandsumthelengthof
sidewalks(inmiles)thatwerecontainedwithintheterritory’sbufferzone(Figure4).
Figure4.Sidewalklength(highlightedinorange)usedtocalculatewalkabilityfor
Clintonville6
OnceamenityvaluesweredrawnfromQGIS,thedatawascompiledinexcelandconverted
intoproperunits.ThedataforeachterritoryissummarizedinTable2.
22
Table2.Summaryofphysicalamenitydataperterritory
TerritoryGreenSpace
Acreage
%GreenSpace
within1milebuffer
Sidewalk
Lengthinmiles
%BlueSpace
within1milebuffer
CV1 228.41 7.46% 136.99 56.40%
CV2 230.12 6.41% 164.74 62.71%
CV3 359.95 11.67% 125.59 95.42%
CV4 316.88 9.62% 145.58 91.83%
CV5 285.2 7.13% 169.06 94.95%
CV6 565.48 16.24% 113.33 100.00%
OTE1 119.25 3.81% 163.03 20.36%
OTE2 210.32 6.54% 185.26 36.85%
OTE3 164.25 5.42% 192.81 34.26%
OTE4 129.48 3.96% 223.81 20.37%
OTE5 277.22 9.55% 154.83 77.83%
OTE6 252.68 7.35% 165.67 73.61%
III.ControlVariables
Icontrolledforrace,gender,income,andlevelofeducationbasedonresponsestosurvey
questions.Race,gender,income,andlevelofeducationwereallmeasuredascategorical
variables.Racial/ethniccategoriesweretakendirectlyfromthemostrecentU.S.Census
23
survey(2010).Toreducethenumberofcategoriesintheregressionanalysis,theseracial
andethniccategorieswerefurthergroupedintooneoftwocategories:“white”or“non-
white”.ThoseofHispanicethnicitywerealsoconsiderednon-white(though,itis
recognizedthatHispanicsareoftentimesconsideredwhiteintheirracialidentity).This
categorizationwasultimatelyadummyvariableseparatingnon-minorities(non-Hispanic
whites)andminorities(allotherracial/ethnicgroups).Genderwasbrokendowninto
threecategories:male,female,orother.Norespondentsanswered“other”,soanalysiswas
basedontheremainingtwocategories.Householdincomelevelswerebrokendowninto
eightcategories,inrangesof$20,000,spanningfrom“<$20,000”to“>$140,000”.There
wasalsoanoptionof“don’tknow”forthosewhowereuncertain.Educationwasbroken
downintosixcategories:someschoolingbutnodiplomaordegree,highschooldiplomaor
GEDequivalent,somecollege,collegedegree,somegraduateschool,orgraduatedegree.
AnalysisandResults
ThisanalysiswasconductedinthestatisticalprogramR,andtheanalysisproceededintwo
steps.InthefirststeptherelationshipbetweenMWBandeachofthefouramenity
variables(greenspaceacreage,percentagegreenspace,percentagebluespace,and
walkability)wasexplored.Amultilevellinearregressionmodelwasusedtoexplorethis
relationship(seeTable3forresults).Multilevelmodelingallowsonetoavoidstatistical
problemsassociatedwithanestedstudydesign.Forexample,contextualfactors,suchas
localsocialconditions,couldinfluenceindividual-levelofwell-being.Ifthisisthecase,the
assumptionofindependenterrorsisviolated,whichincreasestheriskoftypeIerrors.To
24
accountforpotentialnon-independenceofindividualresponses,multilevelmodelsallow
forvariationateachlevel.Forthisanalysis,Iusedtwo-levelmodelshavingsurveyed
individuals(levelone)withintwelveterritories(leveltwo).Theseterritorieswerethen
nestedwithinneighborhoods,butmultilevelmodelsrequiremorethantwogroupingsand
sinceweonlyhavetwoneighborhoods,thislevelwascontrolledforusinganotherdummy
variableintheregression.
Thecontrolvariablesofincome,gender,race,andlevelofeducationwereincludedinthe
model;takingintoaccounttheeffectsofthesevariableshelpedestablishamorerobust
representationoftheinteractionbetweentheprincipalvariables.
Table3:Resultsofmultilevelmodelregressionforthementalhealthindex
Predictor Model1
Estimate(S.E.)
Model2
Estimate(S.E.)
Model3
Estimate(S.E.)
Model4
Estimate(S.E.)
Percentage
greenspace(1
mile)
1.29(2.31) - - -
Greenspace
acreage(1mile)
- 0.00(0.00) - -
Sidewalk(1
mile)
- - 0.00(0.00) -
25
Percentageblue
space(1mile)
- - - 0.01(0.00)**
Income(linear) 0.33(0.10)** .32(0.10)** 0.33(0.10)*** 0.30(0.10)**
Income
(quadratic)
-0.07(0.10) -.07(0.10) 0.07(010) -0.05(0.10)
Gender(male) 0.04(0.10) .03(0.10) 0.04(0.10) 0.04(0.10)
Education
(linear)
0.20(0.15) .20(0.14) 0.20(0.15) 0.20(0.14)
Education
(quadratic)
-0.10(0.11) -.12(0.12) -0.12(0.12) -0.10(0.12)
Race(white) -0.38(0.14)** -.40(0.14)** -0.37(0.14)** -0.37(0.14)**
Neighborhood 0.07(0.16) 0.10(0.16) 0.11(0.19) 0.35(0.17)*
Individual
(residual)
0.59(0.77) 0.59(0.77) 0.59(0.77) 0.58(0.76)
Territory 0.00(0.09) 0.01(0.10) 0.01(0.12) 0.00(0.00)
.=p<.05*=p<0.01**=p<.001***=p<0.00
Thereareseveralimportantresultsfromthesemodels.First,incomeandraceare
significantlyassociatedwithmentalwell-being.Morespecifically,higherincomeis
associatedwithhighermentalwell-beingandwhiterespondentsreported
significantlyhigherwell-beingthannon-whiterespondents.Second,ofthefour
26
amenityvariables,onlypercentagebluespacewassignificantlyassociatedwithhigher
mentalwell-being.Theestimateforthisvariable(0.01)suggeststhataoneunit
increaseinaterritory’spercentagebluespaceisassociatedwitha0.01unitincrease
inmentalwell-being.Percentagebluespaceinthetwelveterritoriesrangedfrom
20.36–100%andMWBrangedfrom2–7.Thisresultindicatesthat,allelsebeing
equal,adifferencefrom20%bluespaceto100%bluespacewouldleadtoa(0.01*80)
=0.80increaseinanindividual’sMWBscore.
Thesecondstepoftheanalysisinvolvedexploringtherelationshipbetweenamenitydata
andthecomponentoftheaveragementalwell-beingscorethatmaybemostimpactedby
localenvironmentalconditions.Thisfactor,“happiness”,wasmeasuredwiththequestion,
“Onanaverageday,Ifeelmentallyhappy”.Iagainfitmultilevelmodelregressiontoeachof
thefouramenityvariablesforthenewdependentvariable“happiness”,theresultsofwhich
canbeseeninTable4.
Table4.Resultsofmultilevelmodelregressionforsinglefactor(happiness)
Predictor Model1
Estimate(S.E.)
Model2
Estimate(S.E.)
Model3
Estimate(S.E.)
Model4
Estimate(S.E.)
Percentage
greenspace(1
3.83(2.42) - - -
27
mile)
Greenspace
acreage(1mile)
- 0.001(0.00). - -
Sidewalk(1
mile)
- - 0.00(0.00) -
Percentageblue
space(1mile)
- - - 0.01(0.003)**
Income(linear) 0.37(0.12)** 0.36(0.12)** 0.39(0.12)** 0.33(0.12)**
Income
(quadratic)
-0.03(0.12) -0.04(0.12) -0.02(0.12) -0.00(0.12)
Gender(male) 0.07(0.13) 0.07(0.13) 0.07(0.13) 0.09(0.13)
Education
(linear)
0.36(0.18)* 0.36(0.18)* 0.36(0.18)* 0.33(0.18).
Education
(quadratic)
-0.11(0.15) -0.11(0.15) -0.12(0.15) -0.07(0.15)
Race(white) -0.54(0.17)** -0.55(0.18)** -.52(0.17)** -0.54(0.17)**
Neighborhood -0.02(0.17) 0.01(0.17) 0.06(0.21) 0.33(0.20)
Individual
(residual)
0.90(0.95) 0.90(0.95) 0.90(0.95) 0.87(0.93)
Territory 0.00(0.00) 0.00(0.00) 0.00(0.06) 0.00(0.00)
.=p<.05*=p<0.01**=p<.001
28
***=p<0.00
ThefirstsignificantresultcamefromModel2,wherethecomparisonbetweengreenspace
acreageandself-ratingsof“happiness”resultedinanestimateof0.001,whichwas
significantatthep<0.05level.Thisfindingsuggeststhatanincreaseof
oneacreofgreenspaceinaterritory’sone-milebufferzonecorrelateswitha0.001
increaseinanindividual’sassessmentoftheirownhappiness.Thegreenspaceacreageof
territoriesrangedfrom119.25to565.48acres.Thisfindingsuggeststhatadifferenceof
446.23acresisassociatedwitha.45increaseinself-reportedhappiness.
Thecomparisontobluespaceresultedina0.01estimatebutatthep<.001level,indicating
thataonepercentincreaseinbluespacecorrelateswitha0.01increaseinself-reported
happinessonthesevenpointscale.Aspercentagebluespaceassociatedwithinthe
territorieshadarangeof80%,thisfindingindicatesthatan80%increaseinbluespaceis
associatedwitha(.01*80=).8increaseinhappinessonthe1-7scale.
Raceandincomewereassociatedwith“happiness”inallfourmodelsandeducationwas
alsosignificantlyandpositivelycorrelatedwithhigherhappinessscoresinallfourmodels.
Discussion
Thekeyresultsfromthisstudysuggestthatthereisapositiverelationshipbetweenblue
spaceandtheMWBofindividuals.When“happiness”wascomparedtocommunityamenity
data,positivecorrelationsbetweengreenspaceacreageandpercentagebluespacewere
alsofound.Theseresultsweresignificantandheldaftercontrollingfordemographic
29
variables.Resultsfromthisstudysupportpriorresearchinthisfieldthatsuggestsa
positivecorrelationbetweengreenspaceorbluespaceandmentalhealth(Leeand
Maheswaran,2010;VolkerandKistemann,2011).
Resultsmaydifferfromthoseofpriorstudies(e.g.thosethatshowasignificantimpactof
walkabilityonMWB)duetodifferencesinthewell-beingmetricusedandthemethods
usedtocollectdataonthemultiplecomponentsofwell-being.Amenitieswerealso
measuredinawaythatdifferedfromcitedstudies.
Forinstance,nosignificantrelationshipbetweensidewalklengthandamenityvalueswas
found,perhapsduetosidewalklengthbeingaweakestimationofanarea’strue
walkability.Walkabilityscalesdifferinthenumberandtypeoffactorsthatareincludedin
anassessment.Astrongerestimationofwalkabilityofeachoftheterritoriesmayhave
beentheNeighborhoodEnvironmentalWalkabilityScale(NEWS),which“includes
dimensionssuchasresidentialdensity,land-usemix,accesstoservices,streetpattern,
availabilityoffacilitiesforwalking,aesthetics,andsafety(SugiyamaandThompson,2007).
TheNEWSscalewasnotusedbecauseitrequiresresponsestoa98questionsurvey,which
werenotincludedintheinitialdatacollectionprocessthattookplacebeforethe
conceptionofthisstudy.Infuturestudies,measurementsofwalkabilityshouldtakeinto
accountnotonlythepresenceofsidewalksbutalsothelength,qualityandsafetyofthose
sidewalksaswelltheirpotentialtofunctionasausefulwaytotraveltodesirable
destinations.
30
FutureResearch
AstudypublishedintheJournalofSocialScience&Medicine,expandsupononeofthe
mainreasonsforslowresearchwithinthefield(Arayaetal.,2006).Howthevariables
underconsiderationaffecteachotherisacombinationofcomplexinteractions.Asan
example,theauthorsoffertheexampleofapoorlycaredforbuiltenvironment,which
negativelyaffectssocialcohesioninthecommunityandleadstopoormentalhealth.Onthe
otherhand,minimalsocialcohesioncouldresultinalackofcareforthecommunity
environment,thusleadingtolowerreportedmentalhealth.Therelationshipanddirection
oftheseeffectsarecomplexanddifficulttodisentanglefromotherneighborhoodaspects
thatalsoaffecttotalwell-being.Thequantityandcomplicationofallthefactorsthatmake
upacommunity’sphysicalamenitiescombinedwiththenumerousfactorsthatcontribute
tomentalwell-beinghasmadeprogressinthisfielddifficult.Controllingforextraneous
andconfoundingvariablesandestablishingathoroughandconsistentmeasurementof
MWBwillbeessentialinfuturestudiestoreachconclusiveresults.
Itshouldbenotedthattheoverallstudyfromwhichthisdatawascollectedwasnot
initiallycreatedwiththeresearchquestionsofthisstudyinmind.Surveyresultsfromthe
largerstudywereusedbecausethewell-beingdatawascurrent,extensive,andrelevantto
thisresearch.Futurestudiesexploringmentalwell-beinganditsrelationshiptoa
community’sphysicalsurroundingsshouldchooseterritoriesmorestrategicallytocontrol
forsocialandeconomicfactorsandtomaximizethediversityofphysicalsurroundings
associatedwiththoseterritories.
31
Implications
Studiesthatfurtherresearchinthisfieldhavewideimplicationsforurbanplanningand
design.Morerobustevidenceisnecessarybecauseurbanplanningprojectscanbea
significantfinancialendeavor,especiallyforsmallcommunities,andsolidevidenceof
mentalbenefitscanprovidejustificationforchangeandinvestment.Asmoresupportis
gatheredrelatingMWBtogreenspace,bluespace,andwalkability,highqualityurban
infrastructuresuchasparks,waterfeatures,and“completestreets”withlandscaping
buffers,trafficcalmingtechniques,sidewalks,crosswalks,andbikelanesmaybecome
morecommon.
Conclusion
Evidencefromcrediblestudieshasshownrepeatedlythatcontactwithnaturedoes
contributetoimprovementsinhumanhealth(Malleretal.,2006).Thisstudyexploredthe
impactofthreephysicalamenities,withthemostsignificantresultscomingfromthe
explorationofarelationshipbetweengreenspaceacreageandMWBandpercentageblue
spaceandMWB.Futurestudieswillcontinuetomakeadvancementsinthefieldby
incorporatingcharacteristics(notmerelythepresenceof)physicalamenitiesintotheir
studies.Ashasbeenrepeatedlyreportedintheliterature,“theeffectsof‘green’
environmentsareincreasinglywellunderstood,[but]littleisknownabouttheimportance
ofvariationinthequalityofgreenspaceforbenefitstohumanwell-being”(Fulleretal.,
32
2007).Thequality,size,andshapeofgreenspaceaswellasthewillingnessofanindividual
toutilizethegreenspaceallchangehowitaffectseachperson.Likewise,thequalityand
accessibilityofthewater,theoptionalrecreationalusesofit,anditsconnectivitytoother
watersourcescanallaffecthowbeneficialawaterfeatureistoacommunity.
TheOxfordJournalofPublicHealthstudypreviouslymentioned(LeeandMaheswaran)
acknowledgestheneedforfurther“robustevidence”withinthisfieldtogenerateastrong
rationaleurbanplannerscanusetoincreaseandimprovegreenandbluespaceandto
makeourcommunitiesmorewalkable.Publicopenoutdoorspacescanandshouldbe
designedconsciouslytoprovidetheoptimalareaforsocialinteractionandsupport,two
communitycharacteristicslinkeddirectlytomentalhealth(Evans,2003).Furthercredible
quantitativeresearchwithinthisareaofenvironmentalpsychologyisessentialformaking
moreinformedandbeneficialpolicydecisions.Ultimately,advancementinthisfieldof
researchwillberelevanttothelocalgovernment,aswellastodesign,architectureand
planningfirms.Developingabetterunderstandofwhatmatterstopeopleandcontributes
totheirhappinesscaninfluencepolicydecisionsandencourageinitiativesand
infrastructurethateffectivelyimproveourcommunities.
33
AppendixA:Well-beingactivityhand-outatstreetstallsusedtodeterminetherelative
significanceoffactorsthatcontributetowell-beinginColumbus,formA.
Pleaseusethese15stickydotstoranktheimportanceofthefollowing19factorsthat
contributetowell-being.
§ Placeeachstickydotinsidethechosenfactor’sbox.
§ Youcanallocateasmanystickydotstoonefactorasyouwouldlike.
§ Beawarethattherearenotenoughstickydotstorankeveryfactor,sochoose
wisely!
Beingabletoeasilyaccesshigh-qualityservices
Gettingenoughskillsandeducationtoliveagoodlife
Havinggoodrelationshipswithfamilyandfriends
Havingasayinwhatmatterstoyouandfeelingthatyourvoiceisheard
Havingasafeandsecurehometolivein
Havingconfidenceinyourself
Havingasecuresourceofmoney
Beingmentallywell,notdepressedorstressed
Beingpartofacommunity
34
Preservingtheenvironmentforthefuture
Livinginaneighborhoodwhereyoucanenjoygoingoutside
Feelingthatyouandthoseyoucareaboutaresafe
Havingenoughmoneytopaythebillsandbuywhatyouneed
Feelinggood–havingfun,beinghappy,etc.
Havinggoodtransporttogettowhereyouneedtogo
Havingsatisfyingworktodo(whetherpaidorunpaid)
Beingphysicallyhealthy
Havingopportunitiesandthefreedomtomakeyourownchoices
Havingacleanandhealthyenvironment
35
A
36
AppendixB:Examplecalculationofmentalwell-beingscores
Eachwell-beingscoreisasumofindividualfactorswhereparticipantsratedtheirown
levelofagreementona7ptLikertscale(i.e.fromstronglydisagreetostronglyagree).Their
scoreforeachfactor,between1-7,wasmultipliedbytheweightassignedtothefactor
basedontheirage.Iftheydidnotprovideanage,anaverageofallweightswasused.
Foran18-30yearold:
SingleFactorscore=Weight(FactorAscore)
MWB=Weight(FactorAscore)+Weight(FactorBscore)…+Weight(Factornscore)
AverageMWBperterritory=SumofindividualMWBscoresofthatterritory/numberof
individualsinthatterritory
Samplecalculation:
MWBofIndividual1(27yearold,CV1):
(1.07*4)+(1.07*2)+(0.79*3)+(0.79*3)+(1.02*2)=13.2
MWBofIndividual2(65yearold,CV1):(1.09*5)+(.75*4)+(.79*4)+(.79*3)+(.89*4)=17.54
AverageforCV1MWB:(Individual1MWB+Individual2MWB)/2
(13.2+17.54)/2=15.37
37
WorksCited
Abraham,Andrea,KathrinSommerhalder,andThomasAbel."LandscapeandWell-being:A
ScopingStudyontheHealth-promotingImpactofOutdoorEnvironments."InternationalJournalofPublicHealth55.1(2010):59-69.SpringerLink.SpringerLink,19Sept.2009.Web.23Mar.2016.
Alcock,Ian,BenedictW.Wheeler,LoraE.Fleming,MichaelH.Depledge,andMathewP.
White."LongitudinalEffectsonMentalHealthofMovingtoGreenerandLessGreenUrbanAreas."EnvironmentalScience&Technology48.2(2014):1247-255.EnvironmentalScience&Technology(ACSPublications).AmericanChemicalSociety,9Dec.2013.Web.30Mar.2016.
Andrews,GavinJ.,EdwardHall,BethanEvans,andRachelColls."Movingbeyond
Walkability:OnthePotentialofHealthGeography."SocialScience&Medicine75.11(2012):1925-932.ScienceDirect.Elsevier,12Mar.2016.Web.23Mar.2016.
Araya,R.,F.Dunstan,H.Thomas,R.Playle,S.Palmer,andG.Lewis."Perceptionsof
SocialCapitalandtheBuiltEnvironmentandMentalHealth."NationalCenterforBiotechnologyInformation.U.S.NationalLibraryofMedicine,4Jan.2006.Web.10Mar.2016.
"BlueHealth."EuropeanCentreforEnvironmentandHumanHealth.ECEHH,2016.
Web.23Mar.2016.Coon,J.Thompson,K.Boddy,R.Whear,J.Barton,M.H.Deeledge,andK.Stein."Does
ParticipatinginPhysicalActivityinOutdoorNaturalEnvironmentsHaveaGreaterEffectonPhysicalandMentalWellbeingthanPhysicalActivityIndoors?ASystematicReview."EnvironmentalScience&Technology45.5(2011):1761-772.EnvironmentalScience&Technology.AmericanChemicalSociety,3Feb.2011.Web.31Mar.2016.
Corvalan,Carlos,Fobil,Julius,HillelKoren,PrabhuPingali,EldaTancredi,andMonika
Zurek."Chapter11:HumanWell-beingacrossScenarios."MillenniumEcosystemAssessment.Washington,D.C.:Island,2005.409-29.Print.
Diener,Ed,andEunkookM.Such.CultureandSubjectiveWell-being.Cambridge,MA:
MIT,2000.Print.Donahue,Ryan."PedestriansandParkPlanning:HowFarWillPeopleWalk?"City
ParksBlog.CenterforCityParkExcellence,13May2011.Web.5Mar.2016.Evans,GaryW."TheBuiltEnvironmentandMentalHealth."JournalofUrbanHealth:
BulletinoftheNewYorkAcademyofMedicine70.4(2003):536-55.SpringerLink.TheNewYorkAcademyofMedicine,Dec.2003.Web.2Mar.2016.
38
Florida,Richard."WalkabilityIsGoodforYou."CityLab.TheAtlantic,11Dec.2014.
Web.31Mar.2016.Frohlich,ThomasC.,AlexanderKent,andMarkLieberman."TheHappiestandMost
MiserableCitiesinAmerica."MSN.24/7WallSt.,22May2015.Web.23Mar.2016.
Galson,StevenK."MentalHealthMatters."PublicHealthReports124.2(2009):189-
91.PublicHealthReports.AssociationofSchoolsofPublicHealth,Mar.-Apr.2009.Web.1Apr.2016.
"GetNHDData."U.S.GeologicalSurvey.U.S.DepartmentoftheInterior,2011.Web.
Apr.2015.Groenewegen,PeterP.,SjerpDeVries,RobertA.Verheij,andAgnesE.VanDenBerg.
"VitaminG:EffectsofGreenSpaceonHealth,Well-being,andSocialSafety."BMCPublicHealth6.149(2006):n.pag.BioMedCentral.Web.2Feb.2016.
Guite,HF,C.Clark,andG.Ackrill."TheImpactofthePhysicalandUrbanEnvironment
onMentalWell-being."PubMed.gov.NationalCenterforBiotechnologyInformation,U.S.NationalLibraryofMedicine,9Nov.2006.Web.1Mar.2016.
Iacono,Michael,KevinJ.Krizek,andAhmedEl-Geneidy.AccesstoDestinations:How
CloseIsCloseEnough?:EstimatingAccurateDistanceDecayFunctionsforMultipleModesandDifferentPurposes.St.Paul,MN:MinnesotaDepartmentofTransportation,ResearchServicesSection,2008.Lrrb.org.MinnesotaDepartmentofTransportation,May2008.Web.29Mar.2014.
Jackson,RichardJ."TheImpactoftheBuiltEnvironmentonHealth:AnEmerging
Field."AmericanJournalofPublicHealth93.9(2003):1382-384.AJPH.AmericanPublicHealthAssociation,Sept.2003.Web.20Mar.2016.
Karmanov,Dmitri,andRonaldHamel."AssessingtheRestorativePotentialof
ContemporaryUrbanEnvironment(s):BeyondtheNatureversusUrbanDicotomy."LandscapeandUrbanPlanning86.2(2008):115-25.ResearchGate.ResearchGate,May2008.Web.23Mar.2016.
Layard,Richard."MeasuringSubjectiveWell-Being."Science327.5965(S):534-35.
ResearchGate.Science,29Jan.2010.Web.29Mar.2016.Lee,A.C.K.,andR.Maheswaran."TheHealthBenefitsofUrbanGreenSpaces:A
ReviewoftheEvidence."JournalofPublicHealth33.2(2010):212-22.Web.4Feb.2016.
39
Luttik,Joke."TheValueofTrees,WaterandOpenSpaceasReflectedbyHousePricesintheNetherlands."LandscapeandUrbanPlanning48.3-4(2000):161-67.ScienceDirect.Elsevier,May2000.Web.24Mar.2016.
Maller,Cecily,MardieTownsend,AnitaPryor,PeterBrown,andLawrenceStLeger.
"HealthyNatureHealthyPeople:‘contactwithNature’asanUpstreamHealthPromotionInterventionforPopulations."HealthPromotionInternational21.1(2006):45-54.HealthPromotionInternational.OxfordJournals,22Dec.2005.Web.14Mar.2016.
"MentalHealth:AStateofWell-being."WHO.WorldHealthOrganization,Aug.2014.
Web.10Mar.2016.Pearson,DavidG.,andTonyCraig."TheGreatOutdoors?ExploringtheMentalHealth
BenefitsofNaturalEnvironments."FrontiersinPsychology5(2014):1178.FrontiersinPsychology.FrontiersMediaS.A.,21Oct.2014.Web.30Mar.2016.
Smedley,Tim."WhatImpactDoSeas,LakesandRiversHaveonPeople'sHealth?"The
Guardian.GuardianNewsandMedia,15Mar.2013.Web.11Mar.2016.Steele,Jennifer,LisaBourke,A.E.Luloff,Pei-ShanLiao,GeneL.Theodore,andRichard
S.Krannich."EasyBib:TheFreeAutomaticBibliographyComposer."TheDrop-off/pick-upMethodforHouseholdSurveyResearch32.2(2001):238-50.Shsu.edu.SamHoustonStateUniversity,2001.Web.14Mar.2016.
Sugiyama,Takemi,andCatharineWardThompson."OutdoorEnvironments,Activity
andtheWell-BeingofOlderPeople:ConceptualisingEnvironmentalSupport."EnvironmentandPlanning39(2007):1943-960.SageJournals.OPENspaceResearchCentre,2005.Web.10Mar.2016.
Tennant,Ruth,ScottWeich,StephenJoseph,SarahStewart-Brown,JennySecker,Jane
Parkinson,StephenPlatt,RuthFishwick,andLouiseHiller."HealthandQualityofLifeOutcomes."TheWarwick-EdinburghMentalWell-beingScale(WEMWBS):DevelopmentandUKValidation.BioMedCentral,27Nov.2007.Web.23Mar.2016.
"TwoOhioCitiesamong'unhappiest'CitiesforWork."DaytonBusinessJournal.
DaytonBusinessJournal,12Feb.2014.Web.21Mar.2016."UnitedStatesCensus2010."Census.gov.U.S.DepartmentofCommerce,2011.Web.01Mar.
2016.VanDenBerg,AgnesE.,JolanaMaas,RobertA.Verheij,andPeterP.Groenewgen.
"GreenSpaceasaBufferbetweenStressfulLifeEventsandHealth."SocialScience&Medicine70.8(2010):1203-210.ScieceDirect.Elsevier,Apr.2010.Web.31Mar.2016.
40
Völker,Sebastian,andThomasKistemann."TheImpactofBlueSpaceonHuman
HealthandWell-being–SalutogeneticHealthEffectsofInlandSurfaceWaters:AReview."InternationalJournalofHygieneandEnvironmentalHealth214.6(2011):449-60.ScienceDirect.Elsevier,Nov.2011.Web.12Mar.2016.
Walker,Perry,JulietMichaelson,,KendraStrauss,andKatherineTrebeck."Oxfam
HumankindIndexforScotland-Background."Oxfam.org.uk.Oxfam,Apr.2012.Web.1Mar.2016.
White,Mathew,AmandaSmith,KellyHumphryes,SabinePahl,DeborahSnelling,and
MichaelDepledge."BlueSpace:TheImportanceofWaterforPreference,Affect,andRestorativenessRatingsofNaturalandBuiltScenes."JournalofEnvironmentalPsychology30.4(2010):482-93.ScienceDirect.Elsevier,21Dec.2010.Web.23Mar.2016.
White,MP,I.Alcock,BWWheeler,andMHDepledge."WouldYouBeHappierLivingin
aGreenerUrbanArea?AFixed-effectsAnalysisofPanelData."PsychologicalScience24.6(2013):920-28.NationalCenterforBiotechnologyInformation.U.S.NationalLibraryofMedicine,23Apr.2013.Web.14Mar.2016.
Wilson,EdwardO.Biophilia.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUP,1984.Print.Yang,Yong,andAnaV.Diez-Roux."WalkingDistancebyTripPurposeandPopulation
Subgroups."AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine.U.S.NationalLibraryofMedicine,July2012.Web.10Mar.2016.