1. gibbs paradox 1
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
1/19
Lecture 6. Entropy of an Ideal Gas (Ch. 3)
Find (U,V,N,...)the most challenging step
S(U,V,N,...)= kB ln (U,V,N,...)
Solve for U= f(T,V,N,...)
1
,...),,(
U
NVUST
Today we will achieve an important goal: well derive the equation(s) of state
for an ideal gas from the principles of statistical mechanics. We will follow thepath outlined in the previous lecture:
So far we have treated quantum systems whose states in the configuration
(phase) space may be enumerated. When dealing with classical systems withtranslational degrees of freedom, we need to learn how to calculate the
multiplicity.
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
2/19
Multiplicity for a Single particle
- depends on threerather than twomacro parameters (e.g., N, U, V).
Example: particle in a one-dimensional box
-L L
-L L x
px
px-px
x
2x x
x
L p L p
x p h
The number of microstates:
Q.M.
hpx x
Quantum mechanics (the
uncertainty principle) helps
us to numerate all different
states in the configuration
(phase) space:
pspaceThe total number of ways of filling up the cells in phase space is the
product of the number of ways the space cells can be filled times
the number of ways the momentumcells can be filled
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
3/19
Multiplicity of a Monatomic Ideal Gas (simplified)
For a molecule in a three-dimensional box: the state of the
molecule is a point in the 6Dspace - its position (x,y,z) and its
momentum (px,py,pz). The number of spacemicrostates is:
There is some momentum distribution of molecules in an ideal
gas (Maxwell), with a long tailthat goes all the way up to p =
(2mU)1/2 (U is the total energy of the gas). However, themomentum vector of an averagemolecule is confined within
a sphere of radius p ~ (2mU/N)1/2(U/N is the averageenergy
per molecule). Thus, for a single averagemolecule:
3x
V
zyx
Vspace
zyx
pppp
p
3
34
The total number of microstates
for Nmolecules:
N
p
N
x
pspace
h
VV
px
pV
333
3
For Nmolecules:
N
spacex
V
3
p
n
p
However, we have over-counted the multiplicity,
because we have assumed that the atoms are
distinguishable. For ind is t ingu ishab le quantum
particles, the result should be divided by N! (the
number of ways of arranging N identical atoms in a
given set of boxes):
3
1
!
N
p
indistinguishable
V V
N h
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
4/19
mUppp zyx 2222
mUpppppp zyxzyx 2222222212121
1 particle -
2 particles -
The accessible momentum volume for Nparticles = the area of a 3N-dimensional hyper-
sphere p13
2/3
!12
3
2area""
NN
rN
p
h
mU
N
V
N
NN
N
2
2
!2/3!
1 2/3
2
Monatomic
ideal gas:
(3Ndegrees
of freedom)
N =1
22
2/3
42/!2/1!2/1
2rr
f N- the total # of quadratic degrees of freedom 2/Nf
UU
The reason why m matters: for a
given U, a molecule with a larger
mass has a larger momentum, thus a
larger volume accessible in the
momentum space.
px
py
pz
pN
Um
N
V
h
eNVU
N
ishableindistingu
2
3
4,,
2/3
3
2/5
Momentum constraints:
More Accurate Calculation of N(I)
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
5/19
More Accurate Calculation of N(II)
For a particle in a box (L)3: (Appendix A)
If p>>p, the total degeneracy (multiplicity)
of 1 particle with energy U is:
Plug in the area of the hyper-sphere:
px
py
pz
3/ 25/ 2
3
4, , 2
3
N
indistinguishable
e V mU U V N p
h N N
2 2 2 22 2 2
2
, ,2 8
x y z
x y z x y z
p p p hE n n n n n n
m mL
2x
hp
L
3
31 3 333 3 3 3
21 1
2 2
pp pLS p VU S p S p
h hp
If p>>p, the total degeneracy (multiplicity) of N
indistinguishable particle with energy U is:
331
!
Np
N NN
VU S p
N h
, , 0x y zn n n
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
6/19
Entropy of an Ideal Gas
f 3 (monatomic), 5 (diatomic), 6 (polyatomic)
(Monatom ic id eal g as)
2
5
3
4ln),,(
2/3
2
N
U
h
m
N
VkNUVNS B
3/ 2
2
3 5 4 3ln ln ln ln ( , )
2 3 3 2B B B B
V U m V U Nk Nk Nk Nk N m
N N h N N
The Sackur-Tetrode equation:
In general, for a gas of
polyatomic molecules:),(ln
2ln),,( mNTkN
f
N
VkNTVNS BB
, , ln , ,BS U V N k U V N
3/ 2
2
4 5
( , , ) ln ln 23 2B BV m U
S N V U Nk Nk pN h N
an average volume
per molecule
an average energy
per molecule
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
7/19
Problem Two cylinders (V = 1 liter each) areconnected by a valve. In one of the
cylinders Hydrogen (H2) at P= 105
Pa, T = 200C , in another one
Helium (He) at P = 3105 Pa,
T=1000C. Find the entropy change
after mixing and equilibrating.
i
f
B
i
f
B
T
TkN
f
V
VkNTVNS ln
2
ln),,(
H2 :
ftotal TUTUTU 2211
2
2
1
1
21
21
2211
35
35
2
3
2
52
3
2
5
T
P
T
P
PP
kNkN
TkNTkNT
BB
BB
f
1
ln2
52ln
2 T
TkNkNS
f
BBH He:2
22 ln2
32ln
T
TkNkNS
f
BBHe
2
2
1
121 ln3ln5
2
2ln2
T
TN
T
TN
kkNNSSS
ffBBHeHtotal J/K67.0totalS
The temperature
after mixing: fBBBB TkNkNTkNTkN
212211
2
3
2
5
2
3
2
5
For each gas:
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
8/19
Entropy of MixingConsider two different ideal gases (N1,
N2) kept in two separate volumes (V1,V2)
at the same temperature. To calculate the
increase of entropy in the mixing process,
we can treat each gas as a separate
system. In the mixing process, U/N
remains the same (T will be the same
after mixing). The parameter that
changes is V/N:
2534ln),,(
2/3
2 NU
hm
NVkNUVNS B
The total entropy of the system is greater after mixingthus,
mixing is irreversible.
2
2
1
1 lnlnV
VN
V
VN
k
SS
k
S
B
BA
B
total
if N1=N2=1/2N, V1=V2=1/2V 2ln2/ln
22/ln
2N
V
VN
V
VN
k
S
B
total
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
9/19
Gibbs Paradox
If two mixing gases are of the same kind (indist inguishablemolecules):
1 2 1 2total 1 2 1 21 2 1 2
1 2 1 21 2
1 2 1 2
/ ln ln ln
ln ln 0 if
B total A B B
V V V V S k S S S k N N N N
N N N NV N V N N N N
N NN V N V V V V
NN
N
N
N mUNh
V
N
32/3
3 2
!2
3
2
!
1
BB kN
N
U
h
m
N
VkNUVNS
2
5
3
4ln),,(
2/3
2
Quantum-mechanical ind ist inguishabi l i ty is important! (even though this equation
applies only in the low density limit, which is classicalin the sense that the distinction
between fermions and bosons disappear.
Stotal = 0because U/Nand V/Navailable for each molecule remain the same after mixing.
2
2
1
1 lnlnV
VN
V
VN
k
SS
k
S
B
BA
B
total
- applies only if two gases are different!
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
10/19
Problem
Two identical perfect gases with the same pressure P and the same number of
particles N, but with different temperatures T1and T2, are confined in two vessels,
of volume V1and V2 , which are then connected. find the change in entropy after
the system has reached equilibrium.
BBBBB kNTkh
m
N
VkNkN
N
U
h
m
N
VkNUVNS
2
5
2
3
3
4ln
2
5
3
4ln),,(
2/3
2
2/3
2
BfBf kNTN
VVkNS 2
2
5
2ln2
2/321
21
2
212121
21
2
21
21
2
21
21
2
21
2
212/3
2
2/3
1
3
21
22
21
4ln
2
5
22
4ln
2
3
4ln
ln23
4lnln
2ln
TT
TTTTNkVVP
TT
TT
VV
VV
TT
T
VVVV
TT
T
VVN
NVV
kNS
B
ff
B
at T1=T2, S=0, as it should be (Gibbs paradox)
BBBBi kNTNV
kNkNTN
VkNSSS 2
5ln2
5ln
2/3
222/3
1121
221 TTTf
- prove it!
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
11/19
An Ideal Gas: from S(N,V,U) - to U(N,V,T)
2/,, NfNUVNfNVU Ideal gas:(fNdegrees of freedom)
),(lnln2
,, mNN
VNk
N
UNk
fNVUS BB
U
Nkf
U
S
T
B
2
1
TkNfTVNU B
2),,(
The heat capacity for
a monatomic ideal gas:B
NV
V kNf
T
UC
2,
- in agreement with the equipartition theorem, the total energy should be
kBT times the number of degrees of freedom.
- the energy
equation of state
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
12/19
Partial Derivatives of the Entropy
We have been considering the entropy changes in the processes where two
interacting systems exchanged the thermal energy but the volume and the number of
particles in these systems were fixed. In general, however, we need more than justone parameter to specify a macrostate, e.g. for an ideal gas
Today we will explore what happens if we let the V
vary, and analyze the physical meaning of the
other two partial derivatives of the entropy:NUV
S
,
We are familiar with the physical meaning only
one partial derivative of entropy:
TU
S
NV
1
,
NVUkNVUSS B ,ln, ,,
When all macroscopic quantities S,V,N,Uare allowed to vary:
NdN
SVd
V
SUd
U
SdS
VUUNVN ,,,
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
13/19
Mechanical Equilibrium
and Pressure
Letsfix UA,NAand UB,NB, but allow Vto vary
(the membrane is insulating, impermeable for
gas molecules, but its position is not fixed).
Following the same logic, spontaneous
exchange of volume between sub-systems
will drive the system towards mechanicalequilibrium (the membrane at rest). The
equilibrium macropartition should have the
largest (by far) multiplicity (U, V) and
entropy S(U, V).
UA , VA , NA
UB, VB, NB
0
B
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
AB
V
S
V
S
V
S
V
S
V
S
BA VV B
B
A
A
V
S
V
S
,
B
U N
k NS PV V T
In mechanical equilibrium:
- the volume-per-molecule should be the same
for both sub-systems, or, if Tis the same, P must
be the same on both sides of the membrane.
S AB
VAVAeq
S A
S B
NVNUNU U
S
V
S
V
STP
,,,
/
The stat. phys.
definition of pressure:
e.g. ideal gas
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
14/19
The Pressure Equation of State for an Ideal Gas
Ideal gas:(fNdegrees of freedom)
V
kNT
V
STP B
NU
,
TkNPV B
UkN
f
U
S
T B
NV
1
2
1
,
The energy equation of state (U T):
TkNf
U B2
The pressure equation of state (P T):
- we have finally derived the equation of state of an ideal gas from first principles!
),(ln
2
ln),,( mNTkNf
N
VkNTVNS BB
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
15/19
Thermodynamic identity I
, ,N V N U
S SdS dU dV U V
Lets assume N is fixed,
thermal equilibrium:TU
S
NV
1
,
mechanical equilibrium:,U N
S P
V T
1 PdS dU dV
T T dU TdS PdV i.e.
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
16/19
Quasi-Static Processes
constVTS f
2/
01
1VT const
The quasi-stat ic adiabatic p rocess with an ideal gas :
constVT 1constPV - weve derived these equations from the 1stLaw and PV=RT
On the other hand, from the Sackur-Tetrode equation for an isentropic process :
Quasist atic adiabatic(Q= 0) processes: 0Sd isentropic processes
(al lprocesses)
dVPSdTUd WQUd
(quasi-stat icprocesses with fixed N)
SdTQThus, for quasi-stat ic p rocesses:T
QSd
TQSd - is an exact differential (S is a state function).Thus, the factor 1/T converts Q into an exact
differential for quasi-static processes.
Comment on State Funct ions : P
V
0
0
Q
S
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
17/19
Problem:
(a) Calculate the entropy increase of an ideal gas in an isothermalprocess.
(b) Calculate the entropy increase of an ideal gas in an i sochor icprocess.
2/,, NfNUVNfNVU
You should be able to do this using (a) Sackur-Tetrode eq. and (b)T
QSd
dV
V
TdT
fNkPdVdUQ B
2
V
dV
T
dTfNk
T
QdS B
2
2/ln fB VTNgNkS
i
f
BconstTV
VNkS ln
i
f
BconstVT
TNk
fS ln
2
(all the processes are quasi-stat ic)
Lets verify that we get the same result with approaches a)and b) (e.g., for T=const):
Since U = 0,
i
f
B
V
V
B
V
VTkNdV
V
TkNWQ
f
ln T
QS
(Pr. 2.34)
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
18/19
Problem:
A bacterias of mass M with heat capacity (per unit mass) C, initially at temperature
T0+T, is brought into thermal contact with a heat bath at temperature T0..(a) Show that if T
-
8/13/2019 1. Gibbs Paradox 1
19/19
Problem (cont.)
(b) for the (non-equilibrium) state with Tbacteria= 300.03K is greater than
in the equilibrium state with Tbacteria= 300K by a factor of
6301450
23
20
10/1038.1
/102expexp
0
0
eKJ
KJ
k
S
B
total
TT
T
The number of 1ps trials over the lifetime of the Universe: 3012
18
1010
10
Thus, the probability of the event happening in 1030trials:
30 630# events probability of occurrence of an event 10 10 0