1 george mason school of law contracts ii statute of frauds f.h. buckley [email protected]

65
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley [email protected]

Upload: kelley-martin

Post on 17-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

1

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Statute of Frauds

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]

Page 2: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why 1677?

2

Party on, dudes!

Page 3: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why 1677?

3

Juries as fact-finders Interested parties not admissible as

witnesses

Page 4: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why 1677?

4

Juries as fact-finders Interested parties not admissible as

witnesses And that made the Statute of Frauds

necessary because….?

Page 5: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Why 1677?

5

Juries as fact-finders Interested parties not admissible as

witnesses And that made the Statute of Frauds

necessary because….? And if it did, why do we need it now?

Page 6: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage The old action for breach of promise

6

Page 7: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage The old action for breach of promise Restatement § 124, illustration 1 Restatement § 90(2)

7

Page 8: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year What kind of promises were these?

8

Page 9: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year What kind of promises were these?

An aide-memoire? Or a significant contract?

99

Page 10: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year What kind of promises were these?

An aide-memoire? Or a significant contract? Do you agree with Farnsworth?

1010

Page 11: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year Land

11

“Tis the only thing worth fighting for, worth dying for”

Page 12: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year Land Executor’s Assumption of Liability

No new consideration needed

12

Page 13: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year Land Executor’s Assumption of Liability Goods worth more than [$500]

13

Page 14: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restatement § 110 ff, UCC § 2-201

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year Land Executor’s Assumption of Liability Goods worth more than [$500] Suretyship Agreements

Restatement § 113-14

1414

Page 15: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

15

Colonial Finance in Virginia

Page 16: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of Frauds29 Car. II (1677)

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year Land Executor’s Assumption of Liability Goods worth more than [$500] Suretyship Agreements

16

Page 17: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Restatement § 110 ff, UCC § 2-201

Marriage Promises not to be performed within

One Year Land Executor’s Assumption of Liability Goods worth more than [$500] Suretyship Agreements

1717

Page 18: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

A trap for the unwary?

18

Page 19: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of FraudsWhat’s its Purpose? McIntosh

19

Page 20: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of FraudsWhat’s its Purpose? McIntosh

Evidentiary Antifraud

2020

Page 21: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of FraudsWhat’s its Purpose? McIntosh

Evidentiary Antifraud

Cautionary Reflects seriousness of contracting

2121

Page 22: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of FraudsWhat’s its Purpose? McIntosh

Evidentiary Antifraud

Cautionary Reflects seriousness of contracting

Channeling Settling terms

2222

Page 23: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The Statute of FraudsWhat’s its Purpose? McIntosh

Evidentiary Cautionary Channeling

Can you think of a fourth reason, unconnected to the protection of the parties?

2323

Page 24: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in

McIntosh?

24

Page 25: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in

McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term

2525

Page 26: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in

McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term What that term might be

Gee, let’s say one year

2626

Page 27: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in

McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term What that term might be Not unenforceable by virtue of the Statute

of Frauds

2727

Page 28: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Do salesmen have tenure?

28

Ron Popeil and the Veg-o-matic

28

Page 29: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” I ask you to work for me on January 10,

2010, with the expectation that the work will be completed by January 10, 2011

2929

Page 30: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” I ask you to work for me on January 10,

2010, with the expectation that the work will be completed by January 10, 2011 Restatement § 130

3030

Page 31: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” I ask you to work for me on January 10,

2010, with the expectation that the work MIGHT be completed by January 10, 2011 Restatement § 130

3131

Page 32: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

How does the one-year rule work?

“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” I insure your house against fire for five years

without a writing. Three years have elapsed. Restatement § 130, illustration 1.

3232

Page 33: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

McIntosh

What is estoppel? And promissory estoppel?

33

Page 34: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

McIntosh

Restatement § 139 Promisor should expect reliance Promisee does rely Non-enforcement would be unjust

Cf. Restatement § 90

34

Page 35: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?

35

What do you think would have happened if McIntosh had asked for a written contract?

Page 36: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?

36

If you’re Murphy, how do you react to the decision?

36

Page 37: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Is land different?

What do real estate agents make you do if you want to buy a house?

37

Page 38: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Is land different?

What do real estate agents make you do if you want to buy a house? Written offers throughout Closing

38

Page 39: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What happened in Schwedes?

Sale by seller--No real estate agent

39

Page 40: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What happened in Schwedes?

Sale by seller--No real estate agent What, if anything, constituted promisee

reliance?

40

Page 41: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What happened in Schwedes?

Sale by seller--No real estate agent What, if anything, constituted promisee

reliance? Securing financing The offer to send the purchase price

41

Page 42: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

What happened in Schwedes?

Sale by seller--No real estate agent What, if anything, constituted promisee

reliance? If the promisee could recover in damages

for this, just what would this amount to?

42

Page 43: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?

Why was a defense of promissory estoppel explicitly rejected in Schwedes?

43

Page 44: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?

Cf. Restatement § 129

4444

Page 45: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?

Cf. Restatement § 129 Buyer gives seller purchase price. Can

buyer have specific performance?

4545

Page 46: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?

But cf. Restatement § 129 Buyer gives seller purchase price. Can

buyer have specific performance? Cf. Illustration 1 Contrast Illustration 3 Restatement § 139(2)(a)

4646

Page 47: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Lawyer’s Ethical Duties

Should Hoover have disclosed that the sellers were dickering with another purchaser?

47

Page 48: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Lawyer’s Ethical Duties

Should Hoover have disclosed that the sellers were dickering with another purchaser? MRPR § 1.6 A lawyer shall not reveal

information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent…

4848

Page 49: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Lawyer’s Ethical Duties

What about saying that sending the payment was unnecessary?

4949

Page 50: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Lawyer’s Ethical Duties

What about saying that sending the payment was unnecessary? MRPR § 4.3 The lawyer shall not give legal

advice to an unrepresented person, other than the advice to secure counsel, if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the interests of such a person are or have a reasonable possibility of being in conflict with the interests of the client.

5050

Page 51: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

Restatement §§ 110, 131 Signed by or on behalf of the party to be

charged Specifies subject matter Evidences existence of a contract Essential terms

51

Page 52: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

UCC § 2-201(1) Signed by or on behalf of the party to be

charged Evidences existence of a contract But not above quantity of goods shwon

in the writing

52

Page 53: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti?

53

Page 54: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS” on Steve Schneider’s

draft terms

54

Page 55: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS”

UCC § 1-201(39) Signed “includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to authenticate a writing.”

Restatement § 134, illustration 3

55

Page 56: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS” Did it matter that this was a pre-

contractual draft?

56

Page 57: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS” Did it matter that this was a pre-

contractual draft? Restatement § 136 Posner’s three cases: how to tell them

apart?

57

Page 58: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

What about the internal memo by Raymond Davis?

58

Page 59: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices How did Π obtain this?

59

Page 60: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

The “note or memorandum in writing”

What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices How did Π obtain this? Restatement § 132 applicable?

Posner: they don’t refer to each other

60

Page 61: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Monetti

What was the part performance?

61

Melform products

Page 62: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Monetti

What was the part performance? Restatement §§ 139, 145 UCC § 2-201(3)(c)

62

Page 63: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

Monetti

What was the part performance? Restatement §§ 139, 145 UCC § 2-201(3)(c)

Does this mean the agreement is enforceable?

6363

Page 64: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

When does Art. 2 apply?

A sale on inventory and a distributorship agreement A general or a nominate contract?

64

Page 65: 1 George Mason School of Law Contracts II Statute of Frauds F.H. Buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu

65

George Mason School of Law

Contracts II

Terms

F.H. Buckley

[email protected]