1 george mason school of law contracts i xxii. statute of frauds f.h. buckley [email protected]
TRANSCRIPT
The Statute of Frauds: Why 1677?
2
Party on, dudes!
Why 1677?
3
Juries as fact-finders
Why 1677?
4
Juries as fact-finders Interested parties not admissible as
witnesses
Why 1677?
5
Juries as fact-finders Interested parties not admissible as
witnesses If that made the Statute of Frauds
necessary then, why do we need it now?
The problem: A trap for the unwary?
6
What’s the purpose of the SoF?
7
• McIntosh at 517
What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary Antifraud
88
What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary Antifraud
Cautionary Reflects seriousness of contracting
99
What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary Antifraud
Cautionary Reflects seriousness of contracting
Channeling Distinguishing enforceable contracts
1010
What’s the purpose of the SoF?
Evidentiary Antifraud
Cautionary Reflects seriousness of contracting
Channeling Distinguishing enforceable contracts
[Economizing on court costs?]
1111
The Statute of FraudsRestatement § 110 (a) a contract of an executor or administrator to answer for a duty of his
decedent; (b) a contract to answer for the duty of another (the suretyship
provision); (c) a contract made upon consideration of marriage (the marriage
provision); (d) a contract for the sale of an interest in land (the land contract
provision); (e) a contract that is not to be performed within one year from the
making thereof (the one-year provision). (2) The following classes of contracts, which were traditionally subject
to the Statute of Frauds, are now governed by Statute of Frauds provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code:
(a) a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more (Uniform Commercial Code § 2-201);
(c) a contract for the sale of personal property not otherwise covered, to the extent of enforcement by way of action or defense beyond $5,000 in amount or value of remedy (Uniform Commercial Code § 1-206).
12
Restatement § 110MY LEGS
M: consideration of marriage; Y: not to be performed within one year; L: sale of an interest in land; E: a contract of an executor; G: sale of goods for $500 or more; S: a contract to answer for the duty of
another (the suretyship provision)
13
What is the sanction for non-compliance?
Restatement § 110(1): not enforceable absent a memorandum in writing … signed by the party to be charged.
14
What is the sanction for non-compliance? UCC § 2-201(1) Except as otherwise provided in
this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker.
15
So when would we want to require a writing?
What do the categories of Restatement § 110 tell us?
M: consideration of marriage; Y: not to be performed within one year; L: sale of an interest in land; E: a contract of an executor; G: sale of goods for $500 or more; S: a contract to answer for the duty of another
(the suretyship provision)
16
The Statute of FraudsWhat’s its Purpose? McIntosh
Major Contracts
Possibility of a ill-considered promise
1717
Marriage Settlements The old action for breach of promise
18
Marriage Settlements
Restatement § 124 Within the SoF if the consideration is a
“marriage or a promise to marry” unless only “mutual promises of two persons to marry each other”
19
Marriage Settlements
A and B promise to marry and A reneges? Not in SoF if only “mutual promises of
two persons to marry each other”
20
Marriage Settlements
A promises to settle Blackacre upon B when she marries A: Restatement 124, Illustration 1
21
Marriage Settlements
Restatement §§ 110(1)(c), 124 A promises to settle Blackacre upon
B when she marries A: Illustration 1 What does the reference to
“consideration” exclude?
22
Marriage Settlements
A promises to settle Blackacre upon B when she marries A: Illustration 1
What does the reference to “consideration” exclude? Cf. illustration 5
23
Promises not to be performed within One Year
Restatement § 110(1)(e) What is the rationale for the rule?
24
Promises not to be performed within One Year
What is the rationale for the rule? An aide-memoire? Or a significant contract?
2525
Promises not to be performed within One Year
What is the rationale for the rule? An aide-memoire? Or a significant contract? Do you agree with Farnsworth at
521?
2626
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in
McIntosh at 515?
27
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in
McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term
2828
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in
McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term What that term might be
2929
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in
McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term What that term might be
Gee, let’s say one year
3030
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” What does the Π have to assert to win in
McIntosh? Not terminable at will, but for a fixed term What that term might be But then Δ asserts the promise is not
unenforceable by virtue of the Statute of Frauds
3131
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” It’s Feb. 5, 2014. I ask you to work for me
from March 1, 2014 until March 1, 2015
3232
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” It’s Feb. 5, 2014. I ask you to work for me
from March 1, 2014 until March 1, 2015 Restatement § 130(1) Where any promise in
a contract cannot be fully performed within a year from the time the contract is made, all promises in the contract are within the Statute of Frauds until one party to the contract completes his performance.
3333
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” It’s Feb. 1, 2014. I ask you to repaint the
ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which likely will take five years.
3434
How does the one-year rule work?
It’s November 1, 2012. I ask you to repaint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, which likely will take five years. Restatement § 130(1) Where any promise in a
contract cannot be fully performed within a year from the time the contract is made
3535
How does the one-year rule work?
“Not to be performed within one year from the making thereof” I insure your house against fire for five years
without a writing. Three years have elapsed. Restatement § 130, illustration 1.
3636
Land: 110(1)(d)
37
“Tis the only thing worth fighting for, worth dying for”
Is land different?
What do real estate agents make you do if you want to buy a house?
38
Is land different?
What do real estate agents make you do if you want to buy a house? Written offers throughout Closing
39
Is land different?
Restatement § 125 “A promise to transfer to any person any
interest in land” Qu. Present conveyances?
40
Is land different?
Restatement § 125 “A promise to transfer to any person any
interest in land” Qu. Leaseholds? Cf. 125(4)
41
Goods worth more than $500
Restatement § 110(2)(a) → UCC § 2-201 a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or
more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.
42
Suretyship
Seller of Ferrari
Idiot, Doting Parent Spendthrift Childstands surety
4343
Suretyship
Obligee
Principal (obligor)
4444
Suretyship
Obligee (promisee)
Surety for Principal Principal (obligor)(promisor)
4545
Suretyship Agreements
Restatement § 112 The promisee (Ferrari seller) is an
obligee of the other’s duty (owed money by the child)
The promisor is a surety for the other (parent gurantees child’s debt to Ferrari owner)
The promisee knows or has reason to know of the suretyship relation (Ferrari seller knows of guarantee)
4646
Executors
Restatement § 111: “if a similar contract to answer for the duty of a living person would be within the SoF to answer for the duty of another”
Piggybacks on the suretyship provision
47
Executors
Restatement § 111: “if a similar contracts to answer for the duty of a living person would be within the SoF to answer for the duty of another”
Piggybacks on the suretyship provision Cf. Illustrations 1 and 2
48
Getting around the SoF
Estoppel Part Performance Note or memorandum in writing
4949
Will estoppel work against the SoF?
Restatement § 139(1). A promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third person and which does induce the action or forbearance is enforceable notwithstanding the Statute of Frauds if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise. The remedy granted for breach is to be limited as justice requires.
50
Will estoppel work against the SoF? Restatement § 139(2) In determining whether injustice
can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise, the following circumstances are significant: (a) the availability and adequacy of other remedies, particularly cancellation and restitution; (b) the definite and substantial character of the action or forbearance in relation to the remedy sought; (c) The extent to which the action of forbearance corroborates evidence of the making and terms of the promise, or the making and terms are otherwise established by clear and convincing evidence; (d) the reasonableness of the action or forbearance; (e) the extent to which the action of forbearance was foreseeable by the promisor.
51
Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?
52
Oh, the hardship!!!
Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?
53
What do you think would have happened if McIntosh had asked for a written contract?
Are salesmen given tenure?
54
Ron Popeil and the Veg-o-matic
54
Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?
55
If you’re Murphy, how do you react to the decision?
55
Was McIntosh a proper case for estoppel?
56
Should estoppel mimic the bargain the parties would likely have struck?
56
Is land different?
Restatement § 125 “A promise to transfer to any person any
interest in land” What counts as reliance? Schwedes
at 521 Securing financing? The offer to send the purchase price?
57
Part Performance and Land
Cf. Restatement § 129 The party to be charged “has so changed
his position that injustice can be avoided only by specific performance”
5858
Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?
Restatement § 129 Buyer gives seller purchase price. Can
buyer have specific performance? Cf. Illustration 1
5959
Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?
Restatement § 129 Buyer gives seller purchase price. Can
buyer have specific performance? Cf. Illustration 1 Contrast Illustration 3
6060
Can you distinguish Schwedes from McIntosh?
But cf. Restatement § 129 Buyer gives seller purchase price. Can
buyer have specific performance? Cf. Illustration 1 Contrast Illustration 3 Restatement § 139(2)(a): “the availability of
other remedies”
6161
The “note or memorandum in writing”
Restatement § 131. Unless additional requirements are prescribed by the particular statute, a contract within the Statute of Frauds is enforceable if it is evidenced by any writing, signed by or on behalf of the party to be charged, which (a) reasonably identifies the subject matter of the contract, (b) is sufficient to indicate that a contract with respect thereto has been made between the parties or offered by the signer to the other party, and (c) states with reasonable certainty the essential terms of the unperformed promises in the contract.
62
The UCC on the “note or memorandum in writing”
UCC § 2-201(1)(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker. A writing is not insufficient because it omits or incorrectly states a term agreed upon but the contract is not enforceable under this paragraph beyond the quantity of goods shown in such writing.
63
The “note or memorandum in writing”
What is a signature? Cf. Restatement § 134: “any symbol made
or adopted with an intention, actual or apparent, to authenticate the writing as that of the signer” Cf. Illustrations 1 and 3
64
Monetti at 525
65
Melform products
Monetti
How was this within the SoF?
66
Monetti
How was this within the SoF? One year Sale of Goods?
67
Monetti
How was this within the SoF? One year Sale of Goods? Why might it matter which it is?
68
Monetti
In what sense is this not like a sale of goods? Cf. UCC 2-105(1)
Sale of goods or distributorship agreement? Which one fits better (predominant purpose)? Both statutes? A mixed contract (pick and choose)?
69
Monetti
Who is the party to be charged?
70
Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” by Anchor?
71
Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” by Anchor? Typed initials “SS” on Steve Schneider’s
draft “Topics for Discussion”
72
Monetti
UCC § 1-201(37) Signed “includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to adopt or accept a writing.”
Restatement § 134 (“any symbol made or adopted with an intention, actual or apparent, to authenticate a writing”)
Illustrations 1 and 3
73
Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” by Anchor? Typed initials “SS” Did it matter that this was a pre-
contractual draft?
74
Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS” Did it matter that this was a pre-
contractual draft? Restatement § 136: “at any time before or
after the formation of the contract”
75
Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS” Did it matter that this was a pre-
contractual draft? UCC§ 2-201(1): “has been made”
76
Monetti
How was the first writing “signed” in Monetti? Typed initials “SS” Did it matter that this was a pre-
contractual draft? Posner’s three cases on 526: how to tell
them apart?
77
Monetti
What about contracts accepted by email?
78
Monetti
UCC § 1-201(37) Signed “includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with present intention to adopt or accept a writing.”
Restatement § 134 (“any symbol made or adopted with an intention, actual or apparent, to authenticate a writing”)
79
Monetti
What about the internal “summary agreement” by Raymond Davis?
80
Monetti
What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices
81
Monetti
What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices Is Restatement § 132 applicable?:
Several writings are integrated if one is signed and the circumstances indicate they belong to the same transaction
82
Monetti
What about the internal memo? Δ’s letterhead suffices How did Π obtain this? Is Restatement § 132 applicable?
Posner: probably not, since they don’t refer to each other (527)
Posner: “we are permitted to connect them” (529)
83
Monetti
What was the part performance? Restatement § 139(2)(b) “definite and
substantial character of the action”) UCC § 2-201(3)(c) (goods “received and
accepted”)
8484