1 forensic science chapter 16: document and voice examination

34
1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

Upload: brooke-manning

Post on 16-Jan-2016

232 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

1

Forensic Science

Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

Page 2: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

2

Questioned Document

• Any document about which some issue has been raised or that is the subject or an investigation• source or authenticity is in doubt

• May include writings on walls or other objects

Page 3: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

3

QD success

• Based on applying knowledge gathered through years of experience and training.

• Comparison-based• Need known writings

• As unique as fingerprints

Page 4: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

4

General style

• Learned in school as we copy letters• For young learners, handwriting is

very similar.• Changes by time and locale• As the learner gets better at writing

and the process becomes subconscious, they start to develop their own style and writing becomes more unique.

Page 5: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

5

Variations• Expected in

• Slope• Speed• Pressure• Letter and word spacing• Relative sizes of letters• Connections• Pen movements• Writing skill• Finger dexterity

Page 6: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

6

Variations from habits

• Margins• Spacings• Crowding• Insertions• alignment

Page 7: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

7

Other variations

• Spelling• Punctuation• Phraseology• grammar

Page 8: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

8

comparisons

• Must be based on many characteristics

Page 9: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

9

Difficulties

• Only a few words• Written to disguise

• Threatening letters• Attempt may fail if the document is

long

• Altered by drugs or alcohol

Page 10: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

10

Exemplar

• An authentic sample used for comparisons purposes

Page 11: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

11

Natural Variations

• Normal deviations found between repeated specimens of an individual’s handwriting or any printing device.

• Handwriting changes with age (but slowly)

• If a signature matches exactly, that points towards forgery by tracing.

Page 12: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

12

Getting exemplars

• May be obtained by court order• Handwriting samples are not

protected by the fifth amendment• Right to not incriminate yourself

• Doesn’t violate the fourth amendment• Police need a warrant to search you

or your property

Page 13: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

13

Getting a good sample

• Let the writer sit comfortably without distraction.

• Don’t show them the QD or help them with spelling or punctuation.

• Use similar pen and paper to the QD.

• Use the same words as the QD

Page 14: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

14

Getting a good sample

• Don’t tell them when to use uppercase unless necessary.

• Collect at least a page of exemplar.• Have them repeat the writing three

times.• Have them write signatures with

other text – such as a check.• Have the QD examined before

taking exemplars.

Page 15: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

15

Comparing typewriters

• Determine make and model• databases

• Compare to suspect machine• Wear and tear

• Letters are too high or low• Letters are off to one side• Letters slant

Page 16: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

16

Comparing printers, copiers, and faxes• Make and model• Compare with suspect machine

• Markings produced by machine• Debris in machine

Page 17: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

17

Erasure

• The removal of writings, typewriting, or printing from a document.

• Either chemical means or an abrasive instrument.

Page 18: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

18

Erasures

• Upper fibers are disturbed.• Can be see with a microscope or

oblique (side) lighting.• Can’t always determine what was

erased.

Page 19: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

19

Infrared luminescence

• Some dyes emit infrared light when exposed to blue-green light.

• Used to detect alterations made with a different kind of ink.

• Used to reveal writing that has been erased.

Page 20: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

20

Obliteration

• The blotting out or smearing over of writing or printing to make it unreadable.

• Difficult to recover if the same ink is used.

• Different inks may be detected using infrared photography.

Page 21: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

21

Charred document

• Has become darkened and brittle through exposure to fire or excessive heat.

• Can decipher using infrared photography or light at different angles.

Page 22: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

22

Digitizing

• Storing an image into a computer’s memory.• Scanner• Digital camera

• Digitized images can be edited using a program such as Adobe Photoshop ®• Lighten/darken• Color• Contrast• See color plates between pages 478 and 479

Page 23: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

23

Indented writings

• Impressions left on papers positioned under a piece of paper that has been written on.

• Readable under oblique lighting• Electrostatic detection

• The paper is charged and toner is applied.

• The toner sticks to the indented writings, making them visible.

Page 24: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

24

Ink analysis

• Chromatography is used to separate ink into individual dyes.

• The Treasury Department is compiling a database of inks.

• Can prove backdating if the dye used was not yet available.

• Tagged ink – produced using a different chemical tag each year to allow precise dating.

Page 25: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

25

Paper analysis

• General appearance• Weight• Color• Watermarks• Fiber identification• Additives, fillers, and pigments

Page 26: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

26

Chromatography

• More notes coming soon…..

Page 27: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

27

Sound spectrograph

• Converts speech into a visible graphic display

• developed in 1941 at Bell Telephone Laboratories

• Used during WWII• Now widely accepted as evidence

in court

Page 28: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

28

Voiceprint

• Pictorial representation of the frequency, duration, and amplitude of human voice sounds

• Used for identification

Page 29: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

29

Body parts involved in speech• Brain

• Controls speech process

• Lower respiratory Tract• Trachea, lungs, diaphragm• Used to supply the breath stream

• Vocal cords• Used to modulate breath stream

Page 30: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

30

• Vocal Cavities• Nasal (nose), oral (mouth),

pharyngeal (throat)• Used to select and suppress

overtones

• Articulators• Lips, teeth, tongue, jaw, soft palate• Used to vary the vocal cavities

Page 31: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

31

Spectrogram (voiceprint)

• Frequencies are converted into electrical energy and recorded on special paper.

• Shows• Time (horizontal axis)• Frequency or pitch (vertical axis)• Intensity or loudness (darkness)

Page 32: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

32

Computerized voiceprints

• Easier analysis• Allows high quality playback

Page 33: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

33

Categories of identification

1. Positive identification – more than 20 matching speech sounds

2. Probable identification – more than 15 matching sounds and no unexplained differences

3. Possible identification – more than 10 matching sounds and no unexplained differences

4. Inconclusive decision – usually from poor recording

Page 34: 1 Forensic Science Chapter 16: Document and Voice Examination

34

5. Possible elimination – 10 or more sounds that do not match

6. Probable elimination – 15 or more sounds that do not match

7. Positive elimination – 20 or more sounds that do not match