1. experimental setup 2. many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. discussion...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy
4. Discussion
5. Summary and outlook
Recent results on the two-body beta-decay studies at GSI
TCP 2010
Nicolas Winckler, MPI-K Heidelberg, GSI Darmstadt
![Page 2: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Fragment Separator
FRS
Productiontarget
StorageRingESR
Heavy-IonSynchrotron
SIS
LinearAccelerator
UNILAC
![Page 3: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Production & Separation of Exotic Nuclei
108 m, 10-11 mbar, 2 MHz, E= 400 MeV/u,
stochastic + electron cooling
ESR:
![Page 4: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
"Cooling": enhancing the phase space density
Momentum exchangewith a cold, collinear e- beam. The ionsget the sharp velocity of the electrons,small size and small angular divergence
Electron cooling: G. Budker, 1967 Novosibirsk
![Page 5: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
time
SMSSMS
4 particles with different m/q
![Page 6: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Sin(1)
Sin(2)
Sin(3)
Sin(4)
1234time
Fast Fourier Transform
SMSSMS
![Page 7: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
0 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 6 0 . 0 7 0 . 0 8 0 . 00
5
1 0
8 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 1 0 . 0 1 2 0 . 0 1 3 0 . 0 1 4 0 . 0 1 5 0 . 0 1 6 0 . 0
1 6 0 . 0 1 7 0 . 0 1 8 0 . 0 1 9 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 1 0 . 0 2 2 0 . 0 2 3 0 . 0 2 4 0 . 0
240.0 250.0 260.0 270.0 280.0 290.0 300.0 310.0 320.0
know n m asses A q+X unknow n m asses
N um ber of channels 216
R ecord ing tim e 30 sec
188 78+Pt
0
5
10
0
5
10
0
5
10
Frequency / kHz
Inte
nsity
/ ar
b. u
nits
201 84+
194 81+Tl
182 76+Pt182 76+
182 76+
189 79+
Ir
O s
Po
Hg
189 79+Au
177 74+W
196 82+Bi
196 82+Pb
184 77+Pt
184 77+Ir198 83+Bi
191 80+Tl
191 80+Hg
194 81+Au
200 83+Bi
183 76+Ir
183 76+O s
195 81+Tl195 81+PbPb
188 78+ 178 74+Re
190 79+Au
197 82+Bi
197 82+Pb
185 77+Ir
185 77+Pt192 80+Tl
192 80+Hg
199 83+Bi187 78+Pt
187 78+Au
Pb
190 79+Hg
IrAu 181 75+
198 82+Pb
193 80+Tl
193 80+Hg
194 80+Tl194 80+
189 78+
Tl191 79+Hg
187 77+
199 82+ Pb
Hg
196 81+
204 84+
Pt
Pb
Pt Ir186 77+
Po
187 77+Au
BiPbPb
182 75+Ir
194 80+Hg 189 78+Au189 78+
201 83+Po
201 83+Bi184 76+
184 76+O s
191 79+Au
203 84+Po
186 77+Pt
186 77+Ir181 75+R e198 82+Bi
193 80+Pb199 82+
O s181 75+
200 82+Bi
195 80+Tl
197 81+Pb
197 81+Bi 192 79+Hg
192 79+Au
198 81+Bi
198 81+Pb193 79+Tl
193 79+Hg
188 77+Au 205 84+Po
200 82+Pb200 82+Po195 80+Pb
190 78+Hg
190 78+Au
185 76+Pt
202 83+Po
202 83+Bi 197 81+Tl198 81+Pb
188 77+Pt
A q+X
15
0m
,g
6
5+
Dy
150
65
+
Tb
143
6
2+
143
m,g
6
2+
Eu S
m
157
68+
Er
127
55+
Cs
157
6
8+T
m
173
7
5+
166
72
+1
66
72+
180
78
+P
t
Re
Hf
Ta
152
6
6+
152
6
6+
Ho
Dy
159
6
9+
159
6
9+
13
6
59+
Tm
Yb
Pr
W
164
71+
171
74
Lu
16
4
71+
Hf
14
5
6
3+
122
53+
Gd
I
175
7
6+
161
70
+
138
6
0+161
70
+
16
8
7
3+16
8
73+
Os
TaW
Yb
Nd
Lu
14
9
65+
Tb
156
68
+
156
6
8+
Er
Tm
154
67+
154
67+
HoEr
163
71+
147
64
+
14
7
6
4+
147
6
4+
Dy
Tb
Gd
Lu
165
72
+1
65
7
2+
17
2
7
5+
163
7
1+
170
74
+
Hf
TaRe
W
Hf
10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000 90000 100000
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Frequency / H z
Inte
nsity
/ ar
b. u
nits
m ass know n m ass unknow n
Small-band Schottky frequency spectra
![Page 8: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Two-body beta decay of Two-body beta decay of stored and cooled highly-stored and cooled highly-
charged ionscharged ions
![Page 9: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Decay Schemes
![Page 10: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Two-body beta decay
f scales as m/q
Two-body β decay:q does not change
Change of f only due to change of mass
260 Hz
![Page 11: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
EC Decay Rates
EC(H-like)/EC(He-like) = 1.49(8)
Yu.A. Litvinov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 262501
140Pr
EC(H-like)/EC(He-like) = 1.44(6)
142Pm
N. Winckler et al., Phys. Lett. B 679 (2009) 36-40
![Page 12: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
I. N. Borzov et al., Phys. Atomic nuclei
µ = +2.7812µN
Gamow-Teller transition
Electron Capture in Hydrogen-like IonsElectron Capture in Hydrogen-like Ions
Theory:
Z. Patyk et al., Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 014306
λ(H)/λ(He) = (2I+1)/(2F+1)
140Pr 142Pm
3/2 3/2
Ratio H/He: {Theory Measurement
1.49 (9)1.44 (6)
![Page 13: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Single ion decay spectroscopy
![Page 14: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Examples of Measured Time-Frequency Traces
Continuous observation Detection of ALL EC decays
Delay between decay and "appearance" due to cooling
Parent/daughter correlation
Well defined creation timeRestricted counting statistics
![Page 15: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
140Pr58+ all runs: 2650 EC decays from 7102 injections
![Page 16: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
142Pm: 2740 EC decays from 7011 injections
![Page 17: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
142Pm60+: zoom on the first 33 s after injection
![Page 18: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Oscillation period T proportional to nuclear mass M ?
![Page 19: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Decay scheme of 122I
Experiment: 31.07.2008-18.08.2008
![Page 20: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Decay Statistics
Correlations: 10.808 injections ~1100 EC-decaysMany ions: 5718 injections ~4900 EC-decays
![Page 21: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Agreement with other analyses<75% (within 10 frames=0.64 s)
Restriction to injection with 1 EC-decay
98% Agreement
Statistics reduced from ≈ 5600 to 2704 EC decays
![Page 22: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Results of visual analyses
Agreement within 10 frames (0.64 s): 98%
(Difference of 52 EC-decay)
![Page 23: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Results of the visual analyses of 122I (lab.)
ω(1/s) Period T(s) Amplitude Phase (rad) λ(1/s)
1.01(1) 6.22(6) 0.171(27) 1.66(34) 0.0043(12)
χ2 / 81 (pure exponential) = 109.9 / 81 = 1.36
χ2 / 78 (modulation) = 71.8 / 78 = 0.92
pure exponential excluded with 98.2% probability
![Page 24: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Synopsis of parameters for 140Pr, 142Pm, 122I (lab.)
Mparent ω(1/s) Period T(s) Amplitude φ(rad)
122 1.01(1) 6.22(6) 0.171(27) 1.66(34)
140 0.890(10) 7.06(8) 0.180(30) 0.40(40)
142 0.885(27) 7.10(22) 0.23(4) -1.60(40)
If the period T scales with Mparent
→T (M = 122) ≈ 6.13 s
![Page 25: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Discussion
![Page 26: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Are the periodic modulations real ?
![Page 27: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Frequency analysis of the Background
Periodic Fluctuation of the Background and/or Traces?
No significant peak corresponding to T= 6-7 s
![Page 28: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Frequency analysis of one daughter trace
No significant peak corresponding to T= 6-7 s
Periodic Fluctuation of the Background and/or Traces?
![Page 29: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
"Classical" quantum beats
Chow et al., PR A11(1975) 1380
Coherent excitation of an electron in two quantum states, separated by ΔE at time t0, e.g. 3P0 and 3P2
Observation of the decay photon(s) as a function of (t-t0)
Exponential decay modulated bycos(ΔE/h 2π (t-t0))
if ΔE =h/T << ΔEobs = h/Δtobs
no information whether E1 or E2
"which path"? addition of amplitudes
![Page 30: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
µ = +2.7812 µN (calc.)
Coherent excitation of the 1s hyperfine states F =1/2 & F=3/2 Beat period T = h/ΔE ≈ 10-15 s
Decay can occur only from the F=1/2 (ground) state
Periodic spin flip to "sterile" F=3/2 ? → λEC reduced
Quantum Beats from the Hyperfine States
![Page 31: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
1. Decay constants for H-like 140Pr and 142Pm should get smaller than expected.
Periodic transfer from F = 1/2 to "sterile" F = 3/2 ?
λEC (H-like) reduced λEC (He-like) not reduced
2. Coherence over many days of beam time?
1.49 (8)1.5
Measured Theory
with a=0.2
1.23Periodic transfer
![Page 32: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The electron neutrino appears as coherent superposition of mass eigenstates
The recoils appear as coherent superpositions of states entangled with the electron neutrino mass eigenstates by momentum- and energy conservation
Beats due to neutrino being not a mass eigenstate?
E1 – E2 = ΔEν ≈ Δm²/2M = 3.1 · 10-16 eV
E, p = 0 (c.m.)
M, pi2/2M
νe (mi, pi, Ei)
M + p12/2M + E1 = E
M + p2
2/2M + E2 = E
m12 – m2
2 = Δm² = 8 · 10-5 eV2
|νe>= cos θ │ν1> + sin θ │ν2>
(From experiments, PDG)
![Page 33: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
cos (ΔE/ћ t) with Tlab = h γ / ΔE ≈ 7s
With M =141 amu, γ = 1.43,
Δm²12 = 2.20(2)· 10-4 eV2
ΔE = hγ / Tlab = 8.4 · 10 -16 eV
ΔEν = Δm² /2 M = 3.1 · 10 -16 eV
Δm²12 = 8· 10-5 eV²With 13=0
With 13 non zero Δm²12 larger(A. B. Balantekin and D. Yilmaz arXiv:0804.3345v2)
![Page 34: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
•Quantum beats phenomenon connected to neutrino mixing in literature:
(See e.g. H.J. Lipkin, A.N. Ivanov, P. Kienle, H. Kleinert, M. Faber)
•But many objections: (See e.g : C. Giunti, H. Kienert, A.G. Cohen, A. Merle, V.V. Flambaum)
•Quantum beats of two initial states with an energy splitting of the order of 10-16 eV
•Interaction of the 1-electron system with e.g. the magnetic field of the ESR
(e.g. G. Lambiase)•Interference with the neutrino magnetic moment
(c.f. A. Gal)•Interference between EC and + channel
(c.f. V.I Isakov)
•Other suggestions:
![Page 35: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Can data of stored and implanted ions be compared?
P.A. Vetter et al (2008): Implantation of 142Pm in a lattice
arXiv: 0807.0649 Observation of K x-rays:
→ pure exponential decay observed
T. Faestermann et al (2005): Implantation of 180Re into a lattice:
arXiv:0807.3651 Observation of γ of daughter
→ pure exponential decay observed
![Page 36: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Summary and outlook
•Three H-like systems have been measured: 140Pr, 142Pm, 122I•Modulation period seems to scale with M•Interpretation of the data still in discussion
•Improvement of the statistics demands better detection system new Schottky pick-up installed.•Measurement of He-like system and + branch•Measurement at other facilities
![Page 37: 1. Experimental setup 2. Many-ion decay spectroscopy 3. Single-ion decay spectroscopy 4. Discussion 5. Summary and outlook Recent results on the two-body](https://reader038.vdocuments.site/reader038/viewer/2022110206/56649d045503460f949d81cf/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
FRS-ESR Mass - and Lifetime Collaboration
D. Atanasov, P. Beller†, K. Blaum, F. Bosch, D. Boutin, C. Brandau, L. Chen, I. Cullen, Ch. Dimopoulou, H. Essel, Th. Faestermann, B. Franczak, B. Franzke, H. Geissel, E. Haettner,
M. Hausmann, S. Hess, P. Kienle, O. Klepper, H.-J. Kluge, Ch. Kozhuharov, R. Knöbel, R. Krücken, J. Kurcewicz, S.A. Litvinov, Yu.A. Litvinov, L. Maier, M. Mazzocco, F. Montes,
A.Musumarra, G. Münzenberg, C. Nociforo, F. Nolden, T.Ohtsubo, A. Ozawa, Z. Patyk, W.R. Plass, A. Prochazka, R. Reuschl, Ch. Scheidenberger, D. Shubina, U. Spillmann,
M. Steck, Th. Stöhlker, B. Sun, K. Suzuki, K. Takahashi, S. Torilov, M. Trassinelli, S. Trotsenko, P.M. Walker, H. Weick, S. Williams, M. Winkler, N. Winckler, D. Winters, T. Yamaguchi