1 enterprise resource planning mike sullivan jeff frederick karen grubbs melissa orlando
TRANSCRIPT
1
Enterprise Resource Enterprise Resource PlanningPlanning
Mike SullivanMike SullivanJeff FrederickJeff FrederickKaren GrubbsKaren Grubbs
Melissa OrlandoMelissa Orlando
2
What is ERP?What is ERP?
• ERP systems are software packages that integrate all the enterprises data, and provide information based on this data on a real time basis.
Gefen, David and Arik Rogowsky “A Multi-Level approach to measuring the benefits of an ERP system in A Manufacturing firm”
3
Tonight’s TopicsTonight’s Topics
• Overview of ERP
• How it works and why use it
• ERP software suppliers: Oracle, SAP, & Microsoft
• Case Studies: Spartech, Lone Star Steel, & Data2 Corp.
• Take-Aways
4http://www.cs.nccu.edu.tw/~lien/Lib/Image/BCC2/erp-relationship.gif viewed 4/15/2006
ERP System
Help Desk
Call CenterWorkflow
CRMCustomer
Relationship Management
Knowledge Management
E-BusinessE-Commerce
Supply Chain Management
Data Warehouse
Data Flow within ERPData Flow within ERP
5www.developer.ibm.com/partnerworld/pwhome.nsf/weblook/pe_sc_solutions_erp.html viewed 4/15/2006
ERP approach
ERP package selection
Implementation plan
Sandbox
ERP design & deployment
ERP integration
IT infrastructureOperations
Extending The Enterprise
Solution Inquiry
Lifecycleof
ERP
6
Payroll ExamplePayroll Example
http://icsun.ithaca.edu:88/jbarr/312205/312205cc?D=A viewed 4/15/2006
7
Payroll Example (old method)Payroll Example (old method)
Employee fills
out time card
Supervisor
collects timecard
Get OK
From Mom
Supervisor gives
time sheets to
HR
HR produce
s paychec
ks
Supervisor gets
paychecks from HR
Checks distributed to employees
Checks given to employees
http://www.professorsearch.com/search/payroll viewed 4/15/2006
Accuracy check
8
Payroll Example (ERP method)Payroll Example (ERP method)
http://www.wellesley.edu/Computing/Binders/Common/payroll.html viewed 4/15/2006
http://www.cometconstructionsoftware.com/images/prcheck.gif viewed 4/15/2006
9http://www.blog.ebiznis.info/wp-images/blog/ERP%20Benefits_web.jpg viewed 4/15/2006
Benefits of ERPBenefits of ERPB
enef
its
Ben
efit
s
TimeTime
Improved Improved EfficiencyEfficiency
Organizational Organizational EffectivenessEffectiveness
Enterprise Enterprise TransformationTransformation
Lower infrastructure costsLower infrastructure costs
Process EfficiencyProcess Efficiency
Supply Chain EfficienciesSupply Chain Efficiencies
Production ImprovementsProduction ImprovementsPersonnel reductionPersonnel reduction
Cycle Time ReductionCycle Time ReductionInventory ReductionInventory Reduction
Lower procurement costsLower procurement costs
Lower distribution costsLower distribution costsGreater Customer SatisfactionGreater Customer Satisfaction
Revenue/Profit EnhancementRevenue/Profit Enhancement
Improved information quality, Improved information quality, better business processes, better business processes, and increased integrationand increased integration
10
Costs of ERPCosts of ERP
• Training
• Integration and Testing
• Customization
• Data Conversion
• Outside Consultants
• Replacing employees
• Never ending implementation
• Drop in Performance
http://www.cio.com/research/erp/edit/erpbasics.html viewed 4/9/2006
11
How will ERP affect our How will ERP affect our processes?processes?
• Financial processes– Real-time cost and performance analysis
• Across projects and divisions– Better financial planning
• Logistics processes– Supports all phases of procurement process– Integrates transportation management across the supply chain
• Sales processes– Complex pricing and profitability analysis– Real-time inventory control
www91.homepage.villanova.edu/william.wagner/MBA8556/erplec1.ppt viewed 4/15/2006
12
Vendors of ERP softwareVendors of ERP software
www.oracle.com viewed 4/15/2006, www.sap.com/usa/index.epx viewed 4/15/2006, www.ibm.com viewed 4/15/2006
13
““Big Three” Market ShareBig Three” Market Share
Relative Peer Group ShareRelative Peer Group Sharerolling 4 quarters – based on software revenuesrolling 4 quarters – based on software revenues
http://www.sap.com/company/investor/pdf/Misc_IR_FactSheet_04_06_06.pdf, viewed 4-18-2005
Siebel 9%
Microsoft 13%
Oracle 16%SAP 62%
14
Oracle (Nasdaq: Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCLORCL))
• World's leading supplier of software for information management, and the world's 2nd largest independent software company.
• Founded in 1977, now has +40,000 employees in over 100 countries
• Focuses on enterprise software– Database & Middleware – Applications
http://www.oracle.com/corporate/story.html, viewed 4-13-2005
15
• Attempting to capture larger portion of the Enterprise Application market
• 18 Acquisitions in the past 16 months (over $18 billion)– PeopleSoft (JD Edwards)– Siebel– Portal Software– Retek
Enterprise InitiativesEnterprise Initiatives
http://www.oracle.com/corporate/acquisition.html, viewed 4-17-2005
16
• 2000 ERP Software Product of the Year
• Oracle E-Business Suite– Oracle E-Business Suite is a fully integrated, comprehensive suite of
business applications for the enterprise.
• Benefits– Oracle E-Business Suite helps businesses protect their existing
investment, extend the value of their applications, & evolve to the next generation of business applications.
http://www.oracle.com/applications/e-business-suite.html viewed 4/15/2006
17
• Fusion Application Suite – Aims to integrate
solutions software from acquisitions with preexisting applications and databases
– In the pipeline, with 2008 release target
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid21_gci1166780,00.html, viewed 4-17-06
18
• Oracle Certifies PeopleSoft Applications with Oracle® Fusion Middleware: PeopleSoft Customers to Benefit from Oracle’s Hot pluggable service oriented software
– REDWOOD SHORES, Calif., 13-DEC-2005 Oracle today announced it has certified Oracle's PeopleSoft Enterprise applications with Oracle(r) Fusion Middleware 10g Release 2. This marks a key milestone in the delivery of the Oracle fusion software.
http://www.oracle.com/corporate/press/2005_dec/ofm_psft_certification.html viewed 4/15/2006
19
(NYSE: SAP)(NYSE: SAP)
• World's largest inter-enterprise software company and 3rd largest software supplier overall
• Founded in 1972, with a vision to develop standard application software for real-time business processing.
• Currently employs +32,000 people in over 120 countries
http://www.sap.com/usa/company/index.epx, viewed 4-17-06
20
Enterprise InitiativesEnterprise Initiatives
• Focus on less expensive, organic growth
• Capture market share through business migration– Safe Passage program
• mySAP
http://www.sap.com/usa/solutions/safepassage/index.epx,http://searchsap.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid21_gci1135873,00.html?track=NL-137&ad=530635USCA, Both Viewed on 4-18-2006
21
• mySAP and SAP NetWeaver
– Gain new market insights and adapt quickly to market changes.
– Sense and respond to customer requirements in real time.
– Extend processes beyond the organization to include customers, suppliers, and partners.
– plus support for systems management -- all powered by the SAP NetWeaver platform.
That's the power of mySAP ERP.
http://www.sap.com/solutions/business-suite/erp/index.epx viewed 4/15/2006
22
An Efficient ERP System Based on SAP
Financial Management
SalesOrder
MPS
MRP Purchase QCMaterial
Management
Manufacture
QCStorageDeliveryPostSales
Service
http://www.kongyue.com.cn/corporate/system.htm viewed 4/15/2006c
23
• Expected to be the most purchased ERP solution in 2006
• Dynamics Business Suite– Replaced the Microsoft
Business Solutions software this year
– Less costly than the other two competitors
– Ready to use with other Microsoft office-productivity applications
(NYSE: MSFT)(NYSE: MSFT)
http://www.microsoft.com/dynamics/overview.mspx, viewed 4/17/2006
24
SAP AG Oracle Microsoft
SpecialtyMid to Large Businesses Mid to Large Businesses
Small to Mid Businesses
Current offering mySAP and NetWeaver eBusiness, Enterprise One Dynamics ApplicationsHope for the Future mySAP and NetWeaver Fusion Applications Dynamics ApplicationsRelative Costs of Ownership High Average to High LowRelative Tech Resources Average High HighOverall Current State Stable Growth Uncertainty due to mergers Expected Growth
Compatability with Existing ApplicationsAverage Above Average High
Track RecordIndustry Founder /
LeaderSearching for More Market
ShareEmerging Contender
““Big Three” ComparisonBig Three” Comparison
www.XXXXX.com, viewed XXXXX
26
Business Application Business Application Revenue to Total RevenueRevenue to Total Revenue
Microsoft
$38,788
$803
Oracle
$11,799
$3,508
SAP
$10,082
$2,783
http://www.sap.com/company/investor/reports/annualreport/2005/pdf/2005_SAP_Annual_Report.pdf, viewed 4-22-06,http://www.oracle.com/corporate/investor_relations/4q05_pressrelease.pdf, viewed 4-22-06Microsoft 2005 Annual Report, HTML version, viewed 4-22-06
27
Case Studies:Case Studies:
• Spartech Corporation
• Lone Star Steel
• Data 2 Corporation
28
Industries and ProductsIndustries and Products
Spartech 2005 Annual Report
• Products
– Extruded thermoplastic sheet and rollstock
– Polymeric compounds
– Custom engineered plastic products
• Industries
– Packaging
– Transportation
– Building and Construction
– Recreation and Leisure
– Sign and Advertising
– Lawn and Garden
– Appliance and Electronics
29
Company BackgroundCompany Background
• Global plastics manufacturer headquartered in St. Louis, MO with plants in the US, Canada, Mexico, & France.
• 3,500 employees
• $14 billion in sales for 2005
• $12.2 million in profit for 2005
• 25-30 IT employees
• CIO reports directly to CFO; with 4 managers reporting to the CIO
• $8 million IT budget for 2005“Spartech 2005 Annual Report”
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
30
Innovative ProductsInnovative Products
“Spartech 2005 Annual Report”
• Polyactide
– corn based-biodegradable material that is safe for food packaging.
• Low-E Poly
– material that “virtually eliminates the evaporative emissions of gasoline in fuel tanks.”
31
Products and ApplicationsProducts and Applications
Products:• Steel for oil field products.• Specialty tubing products.• Cold-drawn carbon and alloy tubing.
Applications:• Energy• Industry• Mechanical• Automotive• Construction• Communications
“Lone Star Technologies 2005 Annual Report”, http://www.lonestarsteel.com viewed 4/8/2006
32
Company BackgroundCompany Background
• Parent company is Lone Star Technologies, Inc.
• Headquarters near Dallas, Texas
• 3,500 employees
• $1.3 billion in sales for 2005
• $272 million in profits for 2005
• 25-30 IT employees
“Lone Star Technologies 2005 Annual Report”, http://www.lonestarsteel.com viewed 4/8/2006, Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
33
Products and ServicesProducts and Services
• Miniaturized UPC barcode labels
• Specialty labels
• EDI and internet ordering system
• SKU database system interfaces
• Blank labels
Personal knowledge of Data2 as an employee per Melissa Orlando
34
Company BackgroundCompany Background• Operations began in 1960, incorporated in 1989, and
in 2003 completed a downstream merger to create Data2 Corp.
• Corporate headquarters and production in St. Peters, MO with marketing and sales in Concord, CA.
• $12 million in revenue for 2004
• Customer base throughout the U.S. and 22 countries worldwide.
• Operates under a JIT process.
• 65 employees
Data2 Corporation Company Profile – internal document accessed as an employee by Melissa Orlando
35
Market Channel MatrixMarket Channel Matrix
Accessed from Data2 Marketing file, as an employee per Melissa Orlando
36
Product ExamplesProduct Examples
Accessed from Data2 Marketing file, as an employee per Melissa Orlando
37
Need for ERPNeed for ERP
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
38
Spartech’s Need for ERPSpartech’s Need for ERP
• Decision made in 2003 to implement ERP
• Passage of Sarbanes-Oxley
• 8 -10 different systems running among 43 locations with no common platform. Impossible to see inventory from plant to plant.
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
39
Lone Star’s Need for ERPLone Star’s Need for ERP
• Specific business reason
• Lead time on products too long; competition at two weeks while Lone Star offered four weeks.
• Current software in place was as efficient as possible.
• CEO: “Go find a system and implement it”
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
40
Data2’s Need for ERPData2’s Need for ERP
• Operating two independent systems that did not share data.
• Difficult to access and analyze critical information.
• Limited functionality in current systems.
• Outdated, character-based; non-graphical interfaces.
• Navigation within each system was not intuitive – no help or reference manuals.
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
41
Selection CriteriaSelection Criteria
• Software / Hardware implementation costs.
• Annual maintenance costs.
• Vendor qualifications.
• Implementation lead times.
• Technology platforms.
• Integration capabilities.
• User interface.
• Required software features.
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
42
ERP ImplementationERP Implementation
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
43
ERP ImplementationERP Implementation• Formal process began in 2005 with budget of $10
million
• Implementation team of 25: 14 Spartech employees and 11 outside consultants.
• Phase I: Defining and mapping business processes at Spartech.
• Phase II: Implementation of a “pilot” in Stratford, Ontario. Live date is May 30, 2006.
• Phase III: Roll-out plan to implement in system in remaining 42 sites.
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
44
ERP ImplementationERP Implementation
• Depended heavily on a consulting company because no internal ERP or Oracle experience.
• Internal timeframe: 1.5 years with a budget of $6-7 million.
• Total process: 3 years with a budget of $13.2 million.
• Over time and over budget, yet still called the project “successful”.
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
45
ERP ImplementationERP Implementation• Original consultant was acquired by another
company after implementation.
• Original consultant outsourced manufacturing aspect.
• Only found 65% “out of box” software relevant – still needed 35% customization.
• Consultant did not have capabilities to fully understand Data2’s manufacturing processes and the customization needed for efficiency purposes.
• Employees did not fully grasp the software after the suggested training was completed.
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
46
Planned vs. ActualPlanned vs. Actual
• Original budget $350K vs. final expenses of $550K.
• Original timeframe was 6 month from start to finish vs. actual of 18 months.
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
47
Project OutcomesProject Outcomes
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
48
Success FactorsSuccess Factors
• Largely attributed to team lead’s previous experience with ERP. All team members have had experience with Oracle.
• Change management activities: end-user acceptance testing throughout.
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
49
Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
• Make sure ERP implementation process has corporate sponsorship.
• Make sure employees are involved in initial planning stages. Decision makers for time and budget must be familiar with business processes and the company.
• User testing and training is one of the most important aspects. Success is dependent upon it.
• Try to avoid extensive customizations.
Tim Landrum, Manager of Applications, Spartech Corporation – St. Louis, Interviewed in person by Karen Grubbs, April 7, 2006
50
Final ResultsFinal Results• Customers receive acknowledgement of orders and
shipments electronically.
• Packing slips and invoices are more straight forward and provide essential information.
• On-time shipping to customers has improved.
• Order accuracy has improved.
• Customers able to access order status information themselves.
• Suppliers are provided more accurate projections of material requirements.
• Ordering patterns with suppliers are more stable based upon ROP / ROQ analysis.
Mike Borgna, VP & CFO of Data2 Corporation, interviewed in person by Melissa Orlando, April 13, 2006.
51
The Future of ERPThe Future of ERP
• 71% of 271 polled organizations plan to increase ERP spending in 2006
• ERP budget growth is expected to be 14.6% in 2006– 50% of that being application
software
PR Newswire Europe. New York: Jan 24, 2006. Pg. n/a
52
ERP “Take Aways”ERP “Take Aways”
• ERP integrates business information across departments
• Can be very beneficial, but costly
• Many different software providers
• Lessons from the case studies.