1 effects of inflow forcing on jet noise using large eddy simulation p. lew, a. uzun, g. a....
Post on 21-Dec-2015
224 views
TRANSCRIPT
1
Effects of Inflow Forcing on Jet Noise Using Large Eddy Simulation
P. Lew, A. Uzun, G. A. Blaisdell & A. S. Lyrintzis
School of Aeronautics & AstronauticsPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
January 6, 200442nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
Reno, NV
AIAA 2004-0516
2
Motivation• Current CFD calculations which include the jet
nozzle are mostly restricted to a Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach– Prohibitive number of grid points to resolve the
shear layer in LES.
• Forcing yields a way to replace a jet nozzle for LES– Pros: Computationally cheap and easy to implement– Cons: Results are sensitive to forcing parameters
3
Motivation (cont’d)
• Flow development and far-field noise of the jet were affected when selected parameters were changed in the inflow forcing (Bogey & Bailly 2003, Bodony & Lele 2003)
• Parameter that had the greatest impact was the number of azimuthal forcing modes– Used 16 modes in total– Removing the first 4 modes resulted in a more
quiet jet
4
Objective
• Using our LES methodology, investigate and establish further trends on the effects of inflow forcing on:
– Turbulent flow development
– Far-field jet noise
5
LES Methodology• LES methodology developed by Uzun
et al. (AIAA 2003-3322)
– 6th-order compact scheme for interior nodes
– 4th-order centered compact scheme for points next to the boundaries
– 3rd-order one-sided compact scheme for boundary nodes
– Sponge zone is attached downstream of the physical domain
6
LES Methodology (Cont’d)
– Tam & Dong’s 3-D radiation and outflow BCs on boundaries
– 6th-order tri-diagonal compact spatial filter used as an implicit SGS model Smagorinsky results sensitive to Csgs
Localized dynamic SGS model computationally expensive (50% increase in CPU)
Only looking for trends
7
LES Methodology (Cont’d)
Tam & Dong' s radiation boundary conditions
Tam & Dong' s radiation boundary conditions
Tam & Dong' soutflow boundaryconditions
Sponge zone
Tam &Dong' sradiationbcs
Vortex ring forcing
8
Vortex Ring Forcing
• Proposed by Bogey et al. 2003• Simplified expressions
• Total number of modes = nmodes + 1
modes
modes
0 ,0
'
0 ,0
'
cos( )
cos( )
x
r
n
x x x ring o n nn
v
n
r r r ring o n nn
v
v v U U n
v v U U n
9
Setup
• Domain size:
(x, y, z) = (25, ±15, ±15) ro
• Grid points:
(Nx, Ny, Nz) = 287 x 128 x 128
• Approx. 4.7 x 106 points (Every other grid point is shown)
10
Setup (Cont’d)• Jet inflow conditions
– Mach 0.9 and Re = 100,000 (Isothermal Jet)
• Runtime for one case: 4 days on 64 CPUs (IBM SP3)
• Original setup has 16 modes in total
Test case name
No. of modes removed
Baseline None (16)
rf4 First Four Modes (12)
rf6 First Six Modes (10)
rf8 First Eight Modes (08)
11
Setup (Cont’d)
Vortex Ring Forcing
12
Results – Growth rates
• Under-prediction due to short domain length
• Need x > 45ro to get correct growth rates
Test Case
Growth
Baseline 0.076
rf4 0.071
rf6 0.074
rf8 0.078
13
Potential Core Lengths
Test Case Location
Baseline 11.54ro
rf4 13.07ro
rf6 13.43ro
rf8 13.45ro Potential Core
• Jet develops slower as more modes are removed– Experiments: Transitional jet = 10ro, (Raman,
1994) Initially turbulent jet = 14ro (Arakeri, 2002)
• Current observation is in good agreement with Bogey and Bailly’s numerical experiments
14Turbulence intensities – axial (within shear layer, r = ro)
15Turbulence intensities – radial (within shear layer, r = ro)
16
Turbulence intensities
• Shift in peak turbulence intensities due to a longer potential core– Trends so far agree well with Bogey
• However, radial peak intensities show unexpected increases for rf6 & rf8– Uzun (2003) reported a similar observation for
rf6 (M=0.9, Re = 400,000)– Further investigation is needed
17
Far Field Aeroacoustics• Methodology
– Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings surface integral acoustic technique: Open and closed control surfaces are used
– Acoustic data collected every five time steps over 25,000 time steps
– Based on current spatial grid resolution we resolve a maximum Strouhal number of St = 1.1
18
Far Field Aeroacoustics
19
OASPL at 60ro (Open Control Surface)
20OASPL at 60ro (Closed Control Surface)
21
SPL at r = 60ro @ = 60o (Open CS)
22
SPL at r = 60ro @ = 60o (Closed CS)
23
Conclusions
• The effect of removing modes for a vortex ring forcing was studied for an LES code (with a filter used as an SGS model)
• As more modes are removed – the potential core becomes longer– the peak radial turbulence intensities
increase– OASPL increases slightly
24
Recommendations
• Extend computational domain to about 60ro
– Computationally costly
• Include part of nozzle geometry for LES to alleviate uncertainty of forcing
25
Acknowledgements
• Indiana 21st Research Century & Technology Fund
• National Computational Science Alliance under grant CT0100032N
• Simulations were run on SGI Origin 2000 and IBM SP4 at UIUC, Urbana-Champaign
• Also utilized Purdue University’s 320-node and Indiana University’s 600 node IBM SP3 supercomputers