1 discussion of “computer- assisted tools for auditing xbrl- related documents” symposium on...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Discussion of “Computer-Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL-
Related Documents”
Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance
David PlumleeUniversity of Utah
![Page 2: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
How to Spend a Saturday Afternoon
2
![Page 3: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Significance and Contribution
Significance of the question Assurance in XBRL-related documents is inevitable Conducting the procedures manually is tedious and
not fully reliable Contributions
Lays out a set of a assurance objectives Describes software that assists auditors (and others)
in meeting the assurance objectives Some insights into the XBRL knowledge of a limited
number of members of the Information Systems Audit and Control Association
3
![Page 4: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Assurance Objective – Internal Control
To determine whether the controls over the creation of the XBRL-related document are operating effectively (and efficiently)
Do we care whether they are efficient? We would benefit from some details about how
XBRL-related controls would be assessed. In the US, what happens when the tagging
process is integrated into the financial reporting system? (in the case no reliance was placed of controls)
4
![Page 5: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Other Assurance Objectives
Suitability – “appropriateness” is in the eye of the beholder For example, the client feels that
“OperatingExpensesWithCOGS” in their taxonomy extension is sufficiently different from “OperatingExpenses” in the official taxonomy
There needs to be a more objective criterion for suitability.
Accuracy – how do you apply “in all material respects” to the XBRL setting where tagged facts can be extracted from EDGAR in isolation?
5
![Page 6: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Man versus Machine
6
• Assess validity• Graphically represent
- systematic structure - XBRL taxonomy
• Render elements• Map business facts to the XBRL-tagged data • Determine whether documents have required information
• Assess the appropriateness of the elements• Determine whether “similar” elements are created in extension taxonomies• Determine that the instance document does not contain information not in the official filing• Determine that the same taxonomies and rules were applied to create context information
![Page 7: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Role of Rendering
In a world where individual items are extracted by users from a database like EDGAR, is rendering the right tool for the auditor? Will rendering reveal intentionally wrong tags? Will rendering lead to a false confidence in the
correctness of the tags? Is fatigue in “ocular analysis” an issue?
Should there be standards for rendering software that make it easier for preparers, users and auditors?
7
![Page 8: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What Else Can Be Automated?
Focus on exceptions Same tag in multiple instances Compare contexts for common tags Industry-based templates focusing on
“standard items” Standard disclosures; e.g., Pension footnote
More easily analyzed by software agents Semantic languages and tools that exploit
intelligent reasoning
8
![Page 9: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Is there a role for risk assessments?
Can the auditor use the risk of mis-tagging to reduce the number of tags that must be evaluated in detail on a given engagement? Items tagged on a basis consistent with last year? Amounts that even if 100% wrong would be immaterial
by financial audit guidelines. Will the proposed process detect intentional mis-
tagging? Are the results of XBRL internal control
evaluations useful in designing the “substantive” tagging procedures?
9
![Page 10: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Workshop Participants’ Opinions on XBRL-related Assurance
What information was gathered? What questions were asked? How were the scales labeled? What were the ranges (may be Std.
Deviations) of the responses? Are there demographic variables that
explain variation in the knowledge ratings or the rankings?
Are other populations interesting/relevant?
10
![Page 11: 1 Discussion of “Computer- Assisted Tools for Auditing XBRL- Related Documents” Symposium on Information Integrity & Information Systems Assurance David](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072006/56649f565503460f94c7b2cc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Conclusions
Professors Boritz and No are ahead of the regulators who have been reluctant to mandate assurance on XBRL-related documents.
XBRL Audit Assistant points out the current advantages and limitations of computer technology in the XBRL assurance setting.
There are serious limitations in the knowledge of professionals who will be called on to provide XBRL assurance.
11