1. discovery of the w and z bosonuwer/lectures/... · 1. discovery of w and z boson 2. precision...
TRANSCRIPT
1
VIII.Experimental tests of the Standard Model
1. Discovery of W and Z boson
2. Precision tests of the Z sector
3. Precision test of the W sector
4. Radiative corrections and prediction of the Higgs mass
5. Higgs searches at the LHC
1. Discovery of the W and Z boson 1983 at CERN SppS accelerator, √s≈540 GeV, UA-1/2 experiments
1.1 Boson production in pp interactions
p
pu
d
Ws
q,−l
q,lν p
pu
u
Zs
q,−l
q,+l
XWpp +→→ llν XffZpp +→→
Similar to Drell-Yan: (photon instead of W)
10 1001 ZWMs ,ˆ
)( ZW σσ
nb1.0
nb1
nb10
12.0x mitˆ q ≈= sxxs qq
22q )GeV65(014.0xˆ =≈= sss
→ Cross section is small !
2
1.2 UA-1 Detector
1.3 Event signature:
p p
+l
−l
High-energy lepton pair:
222 )( ZMppm =+= −+ llll
XffZpp +→→
GeV91≈ZM
3
1.4 Event signature: XWpp +→→ llν
p p
ν
l
High-energy lepton:
Large transverse momentum pt
Undetected ν:
Missing momentum
Missing pT vector
How can the W mass be reconstructed ?
W mass measurement
In the W rest frame:
•
•
2WMpp == ν
rrl
2WT Mp ≤l
Tpl
TdpdN
2WM
In the lab system:
• W system boosted only along z axis
• pT distribution is conserved
Jacobian Peak:
• Trans. Movement of the W
• Finitte W decay width
• W decay not isotrop
GeV80≈WM
212
2
42~
−
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−⋅ T
W
W
T
T
pMM
ppdN
4
The Nobel Prize in Physics 1984
Simon van der MeerCarlo Rubbia
"for their decisive contributions to the large project, which led to the discovery of the field particles W and Z, communicators of weak interaction"
One of the achievements to allow high-intensity p ⎯p collisions, is stochastic cooling of the ⎯p beams before inserting them into SPS.
S. van der Meer
1.5 Production of Z and W bosons in e+e- annihilation
Precision tests of the Z sector Tests of the W sector
qqW →
5
2. Precision tests of the Z sector (LEP and SLC)
2.1 Cross section for ffZee →→−+ /γ
+=2M
2
γ Z
⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡ −
Γ+−−
⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡ −−=
−=
eggeiMMqMqqg
gggM
eeq
eM
eA
eV
ZZZ
ZAV
W
)(21
)()(
21
cos
)(1)(
522
25
2
2
22
γγµγγµθ
γµγµ
ρρννρµµνγ
µµγ
−+−+ → µµee for
Z propagator considering a finite Z width
~4.5M Z decays / experiment
One finds for the differential cross section:
⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡Γ+−
+Γ+−
−+= 2222
2
2222
22
)()(cos
)()()(cos)(cos
2cos ZZZZ
ZZZ
ZZ MMs
sFMMs
MssFFsd
d θθθπαθ
σγγ
γ γ/Z interference Z
)cos1()cos1()(cos 2222 θθθ µγ +=+= QQF e
[ ]θθθθ
θ µµµγ cos4)cos1(2
cossin4)(cos 2
22 AeAV
eV
WW
eZ gggg
QQF ++=
[ ]θθθθ
θ µµµµ cos8)cos1)()((cossin16
1)(cos 22222
44 AVeA
eVAV
eA
eV
WWZ ggggggggF ++++=
θθθ
σ cos38)cos1(~
cos2
FBAd
d++
BF
BFFBA
σσσσ
+−
=
Forward-backward asymmetry
with
Vanishes at √s≈MZ
6
At the Z-pole √s≈MZ → Z contribution is dominant → interference vanishes
[ ][ ] 222
22222
44
2
)()(cossin1634
ZZZAV
eA
eV
wwZtot MMs
sggggs Γ+−
⋅++⋅=≈ µν
θθαπσσ
“Massive propagator” → 1 for MZ→0
( ) 2212
Z
e
ZZZ M
MsΓΓΓ
== µπσ
[ ]22
22 cossin4fA
fV
ww
Zf ggM
+⋅=Γθθ
α
∑Γ=Γi
iZ
With partial and total widths:Cross sections and widths can be calculated within the Standard Model if all parameters are known
Resonance curve:
22012
Z
e
ZM ΓΓΓ
= µπσ
• Resonance position → MZ
• Height → Γe Γµ
• Width → ΓZ
Initial state Bremsstrahlung corrections
22222 )(12)(
ZZZZ
e
MMss
Ms
Γ+−⋅
ΓΓ= µπσ
sE
zdzzszGsm
fffff
γγ σσ
21)()(
1
/4
0)(
2−=∫=
Peak:
2.2 Measurement of the Z lineshape
7
Resonance looks the same, independent of final state: Propagator the same
hadronsee →−+ −+−+ → µµee
−e −e
+e +e
k k ′
p p ′
−e
+e−e
+e
k
p p ′
k ′
+
channel schannel t
−+−+ → eeee t channel contribution → forward peak
8
MZ = 91.1876 ± 0.0021 GeV
ΓZ = 2.4952 ± 0.0023 GeVΓhad = 1.7458 ± 0.0027 GeVΓe = 0.08392 ± 0.00012 GeVΓµ = 0.08399 ± 0.00018 GeVΓτ = 0.08408 ± 0.00022 GeV
ΓZ = 2.4952 ± 0.0023 GeVΓhad = 1.7444 ± 0.0022 GeVΓe = 0.083985 ± 0.000086 GeV
Z line shape parameters (LEP average)
Assuming lepton universality: Γe = Γµ=Γτ
3 leptons are treated independently
±23 ppm (*)
±0.09 %
*) error of the LEP energy determination: ±1.7 MeV (19 ppm)
http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/ (Summer 2005)
test of lepton universality
LEP energy calibration: Hunting for ppm effects
Changes of the circumference of the LEP ring changes the energy of the electrons:
• tide effects
• water level in lake Geneva
1992 1993
Changes of LEP circumference ∆C=1…2 mm/27km (4…8x10-8)
9
Effect of the French “Train a Grande Vitesse” (TGV)
In conclusion: Measurements at the ppm level are difficult to perform. Many effects must be considered!
Vagabonding currents (~1A) from trains
2.3 Number of light neutrino generationsIn the Standard Model:
νν Γ⋅+Γ⋅+Γ=Γ NZZ l3
invΓ :invisible
eeZee νν→→−+
µµνν→→−+ Zee
ττνν→→−+ Zee
To determine the number of light neutrino generations:
SM
invN ⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ΓΓ
⋅⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ΓΓ
=ν
νl
l exp
GeV0015.04990.0 ±=Γinv
=1.991±0.001 (small theo. uncertainties from mtop MH)
5.9431±0.0163
Nν = 2.9840 ± 0.0082
No room for new physics: Z→new
10
2.4 Forward-backward asymmetry and fermion couplings to Z
−+−+ →→ µµZee θθθ
σ cos38)cos1(~
cos2
FBAd
d++
BF
BFFBA
σσσσ
+−
=with
θθ
σσ coscos
)0(1
)1(0)( d
dd
BF ∫−
=
FσFσ
Fermion couplings
-0.041
-0.038
-0.035
-0.032
-0.503 -0.502 -0.501 -0.5
gAl
g Vl
68% CL
l+l−
e+e−
µ+µ−
τ+τ−
mt
mH
mt= 178.0 ± 4.3 GeVmH= 114...1000 GeV
∆α
Forward-backward asymmetry
• Away from the resonance AFB large → interference term dominates
• At the Z pole: Interference = 0
→ very small because gVl small in SM
2222
2
)()(~
ZZZ
ZfA
eAFB MMs
MssggAΓ+−
−⋅
fV
fA
eV
eAFB ggggA ~
Asymmetries together with cross sections allow the determination of the fermioncouplings gA and gV
Confirms lepton universality
Higher order corrections seen
Lowest order SM prediction:
32
3 sin2 TgqTg AWV =−= θ
11
3. Precision tests of the W sector (LEP and Tevatron)
ffffWWee →→−+
Threshold behavior of the cross section (phase space) for ee→WW production:
Phase space factor = f(MW, √s):
→ Allows determination of MW
~10K WW events / experiment
W decays
Lepton Neutrino
Jet
Jet
12
W branching ratios
Lepton universality tested to 2%
)%28.077.67()( ±=→ qqWBr
Invariant W mass recontructionin
dire
ct
More difficult: pairing ambiguities
13
Effect of triple gauge coupling
Data confirms the existence of the γ/ZWW triple gauge boson vertex
4. Higher order corrections and the Higgs mass
Lowest order SM predictions
Including radiativecorrections
14
Top-Quark Mass [GeV]
mt [GeV]125 150 175 200
χ2/DoF: 2.6 / 4
CDF 176.1 ± 6.6
D∅ 179.0 ± 5.1
Average 178.0 ± 4.3
LEP1/SLD 172.6 + 13.2172.6 − 10.2
LEP1/SLD/mW/ΓW 181.1 + 12.3181.1 − 9.5
The measurement of the radiative corrections:
weff
AVeff gg
θκθ
θ
22
2
sin)1(sin
)1(41sin
∆+=
−≡
Allows the indirect determi-nation of the unknown parameters mt and MH.
Direct measurement of mt
Top mass prediction from radiative corrections
Good agreement between the indirect prediction of mt and the value obtained in direct measurements confirm the radiative corrections of the SM
Prediction of mt by LEP before the discovery of the top at TEVATRON.
Observation of the top quark at TEVATRON (1995)
q
Top decay
q
l
lν
Channel used for mass reconstruction:),( jetjetWjetbmm invt +→−=
TeV2@pp
q
15
Higgs mass prediction from radiative corrections
MH > 114 GeV (from direct searches)
MH < 300 GeV @ 95 % C.L.Awaiting the discovery of the Higss at LHC
Status Summer 2005
5. Higgs searches at the LHC (pp collider @ 14 TeV) Only missing ingredient of the Standard Model: Higgs-Boson
Huge effort to find itHiggs Production mechanism:
16
Higgs decay channels
At LEP: Searches were done using
bbH →(“golden” Higgs decay channel at LEP energies because of large b mass →too much background at LHC)
At LHC:
• mH< 150 GeV:
• 150 GeV < mH < 1 TeV
γγ→H
(*)ZZH →−+→ WWH
MH > 114 GeV
Simulated H→ZZ→4µ event at LHC
• 20 pp interaction / event
• Large number of particles
To trigger and to reconstruct these events is an exp. challenge.
17
The ATLAS Experiment at LHC
ATLAS Construction
18
Higgs discovery potential (ATLAS experiment)
If the Higgs Boson exists, it will be found at LHC
LHC start is foresenfor the end of 2007.