1 creating and sustaining a comprehensive school-wide vocabulary program michael f. graves...

22
Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus [email protected] the placid mommy kitty unreal annoy timid reluctant scow l un d i g n if i ed FL AGRAN T antidisestablishmentarian a apathy Paper presented at the symposium on Promoting Vocabulary Development in Grades 4 Through 12: A Comprehensive Approach. Chaired by Kathy Ganske and Douglas Fisher. IRA Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, May 4, 2008

Upload: andrew-ross

Post on 27-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 1

Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program

Michael F. GravesUniversity of Minnesota, Emeritus

[email protected]

the

placidmommy

kitty

unreal

annoy

timid

relucta

nt

scowl

undi

gnif

ied

FLA

GR

AN

T

antidisestablishmentarianism

a

apathy

Paper presented at the symposium on Promoting Vocabulary Development in Grades 4 Through 12: A Comprehensive Approach. Chaired by Kathy Ganske and Douglas Fisher. IRA Annual Convention, Atlanta, GA, May 4, 2008

Page 2: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 2

[email protected]

Page 3: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 3

The Importance of Vocabulary

Vocabulary knowledge is a crucial factor underlying reading comprehension and thinking more generally (Davis, 1944; Stahl & Stahl, 2004; Thorndike, 1973-1974; Wittgenstein, 1953).

Vocabulary knowledge in kindergarten and first grade is a significant predictor or reading comprehension in the middle and secondary grades (Cunningham & Stanovich, 2005; Scarborough, 1998).

Vocabulary is the primary factor influencing the readability of text (Chall & Dale, 1995; Klare, 1984).

Page 4: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 4

The Importance of Vocabulary—2

Teaching vocabulary can improve reading comprehension for both native English speakers (Beck, Perfetti, & McKeown, 1982) and English learners (Carlo et al., 2004)

Learning English vocabulary is a crucial task for English learners (Folse, 2004; Goldenberg, in press; Nation, 2001).

Page 5: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 5

The Vocabulary Learning Task

The vocabulary learning task is huge.

The average fourth grader probably knows 5,000-10,000 words.

The average high school graduate probably knows 50,000 words.

To acquire this extensive vocabulary, he or she has learned something like 3,500 words a year.

This translates to learning 10 words a day.

Page 6: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 6

Vocabulary Deficits

Many children of poverty and English learners enter school with debilitating vocabulary deficits, vocabularies about half the size of those of their middle-class, native-English speaking counterparts.

Once in school, these children continue to learn words at about half the rate of their peers, and this increasing gap put them at severe risk of failing in school.

Although we have been alerted to this risk for some time (for example, Carroll, 1971; Becker, 1977; White, Graves, & Slater, 1990; Chall, Jacobs, & Baldwin, 1990; Chall & Jacobs, 2003; Hart & Risley, 1995, 2003), schools are only now beginning to do something about it.

Page 7: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 7

Helping Students Build Strong Vocabularies

Helping average students achieve vocabularies of 50,000 words is a very substantial task.

Helping students with small vocabularies catch up with their peers is an even more substantial task.

Only a rich and multifaceted vocabulary program is likely to help students accomplish these tasks (Baumann & Kaméenui, 2004; Blachowicz, Fisher, Ogle, & Watts-Taffe, 2006; Graves, 2006; Stahl & Nagy, 2006).

Page 8: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 8

A Four-Pronged Vocabulary Program

Graves (2006). See Baumann, Ware, and Edwards (2007) for a study validating this program.

Frequent, varied, and extensive language experiences

Teaching individual words

Teaching word-learning strategies

Fostering word consciousness

Page 9: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 9

Frequent, Varied, and Extensive Language Experiences

Reading, writing, discussion, and listening

The emphasis on these four modalities and the teaching/learning approaches used will vary over time.

With younger and less proficient readers, there is more discussion and listening and more teacher-led work.

With older and more proficient readers, there is more reading and writing and more independent work.

Page 10: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 10

Teaching Individual Words

Rich and powerful instruction

Semantic mapping

Semantic feature analysis

Robust instruction

Frayer method . . . . .

Introductory instruction . . . . .

Repetition and review . . . . .

Page 11: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 11

Teaching Word-Learning Strategies

Using context

Learning and using word parts

Using glossaries and the dictionary

Recognizing and using cognates (for Spanish speakers)

Page 12: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 12

Fostering Word Consciousness

Creating a Word-Rich Environment

Recognizing and Promoting Adept Diction

Promoting Word Play

Fostering Word Consciousness Through Writing

Involving Students in Original Investigations

Teaching Students about Words

(Graves & Watts-Taffe, 2002, 2007)

Page 13: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 13

Preplanning

Assessing the situation

Recognizing and appreciating the size of the task

Committing to endeavor of that size

Page 14: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 14

Planning

Find a champion

Create a detailed plan

Garner support

Page 15: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 15

Initiating the Plan

Kickoff festivities

Initial inservice

Page 16: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 16

Year One Activities

Meetings

Between meetings

Teacher responsibilities

Teacher opportunities

Coaching

Assessment

Sharing successes and challenges

Sharing teaching activities

Sharing data

Deliberate plans to maintain and renew interest

Page 17: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 17

Year Two Activities

Adjustments in light of year one

Meetings

Between meetings

Teacher responsibilities

Teacher opportunities

Coaching

Assessment

Sharing successes and challenges

Sharing teaching activities

Sharing data

Deliberate activities to maintain and renew interest

Page 18: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 18

Year Three Activities

Adjustments in light of years one and two

Meetings

Between meetings

Teacher responsibilities

Teacher opportunities

Coaching

Assessment

Sharing successes and challenges

Sharing teaching activities

Sharing data

Deliberate activities to maintain and renew interest

Page 19: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 19

Major Points

Acquiring a sophisticated vocabulary is both a very important task and a very large task.

Designing and implementing a school wide program to assist students in acquiring a sophisticated vocabulary is also a very important and very challenge task.

At minimum, I would give it three years.

Included in the first year would be preplanning, planning, and implementation phases.

Implementation would continue into the second and third years—and of course hopefully beyond that.

Page 20: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 20

References—1Baumann, J. F., & Kame'enui, E. J. (Eds.). (2004). Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice. New

York: Guilford.

Baumann, J.F., Ware, D., & Edwards, E.C. (2007). Bumping into spicy, tasty words that catch your tongue: A formative experiment in vocabulary instruction. The Reading Teacher, 61, 108–122.

Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506-521.

Becker, W. C. (1977). Teaching reading and language to the disadvantaged— What we have learned from field research. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 511-543.

Blachowicz, C. L. Z., Fisher, P. J. L, Ogle, D., & Watts-Taffe, S. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 524-539.

Carlo, M. S., August, D., McGlaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., Lively, T. J., & White, C. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classes. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188-215.

Carroll, J. B. (1971). Learning from verbal discourse in educational media. A review of the literature. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). The classic study on poor children's fourth-grade slump. American Educator, 27 (1), 14-15, 44.

Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Page 21: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 21

References—2

Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors in reading comprehension. Psychometrika, 9, 185-197.

Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Graves, M. F., & Watts-Taffe, S. M. (2002). The place of word consciousness in a research-based vocabulary program. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 140-165). Newark, DE: IRA.

Graves, M. F., & Watts-Taffe, S. M. (2007). Word consciousness comes of age. Unpublished paper.

Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experiences of young American children. Baltimore: P. H. Brookes.

Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003, Spring). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 27 (1), 4-9.

Cunningham, A. E. (2005). Vocabulary growth through independent reading and reading aloud to Children. In E. H. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 45-68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Klare, G. R. (1984). Readability. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 681-794). New York: Longman.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors. In B. K. Shapiro, P. J. Accardo, & A. J. Capute (Eds.), Specific reading disabilities: A review of the spectrum (pp. 75-119). Timonium, MD: York Press.

Page 22: 1 Creating and Sustaining a Comprehensive School-Wide Vocabulary Program Michael F. Graves University of Minnesota, Emeritus mgraves@umn.edu the placid

Mike Graves, Univ of Minn 22

References—3

Stahl, S. A., & Nagy, W. E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Goldenberg, C. (in press). Improving achievement for English Learners: Conclusions from recent reviews and emerging research. In S. Neuman (Ed.), Literacy achievement for young children from poverty. Baltimore, Brookes.

Stahl, S. A., & Stahl, K. D. (2004). Word wizards all!: Teaching word meanings in preschool and primary education. In J. F. Baumann & E. B. Kame'enui (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 59-78). New York: Guilford.

Thorndike, R. L. (1973-1974). "Reading as reasoning." Reading Research Quarterly, 9, 135-147.

Wasic, B. A., & Bond, M. A. (2001). Beyond the pages of a book: Interactive book reading and language development in preschool classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 243-250.

White, T. G., Graves, M. F. & Slater, W. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 281–290.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.