1 cbm added value %26 brand architecture
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
1/20
Lecture 1: Added Value and BrandArchitecture Strategies
Dr. Vish [email protected]
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
2/20
Understand the difference between a brand, a product
and a commodity.
Analyse the term added value and appreciate the
added value provided by a brand for both
organisations and consumers.
Evaluate differing forms of brand architecture
strategies employed by companies.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
3/20
Commodity level:
milk, coffee beans, potatoes
Product level:instant coffee, roast coffee, potato crisps
Brand level:
Nescafe, Kenco, Maxwell House, Lavazza, etc.
Costa, Starbucks, Caf Nero, etc.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
4/20
Product (includes a service):has functional/tangible benefits
Brand:has emotional/intangible benefits that help to create
differential meaning added to the functional/tangible
benefits
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
5/20
Branding differentiates one named product from another:
So a brand has an identity and an image that transcends its
product dimensions.
This happens because a brand provides
added valueover and above the actual product.
ImageIdentity
Name, Logo,
Packaging, Colour
Meaning, Perception,
Reassurance
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
6/20
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
7/20
A brand enhances the overall value of a product in theconsumers mind well beyond its merely functionalpurpose.
(Rosenbaum-Elliott, et.al. 2011)
Added value is a relative concept that enables customers tomake a purchase on the basis ofsuperiority over competingbrands.
(de Chernatony 2006)
A brand (can) addto consumers beneficial experience of aproduct, creating a value for which people are prepared topay.
(Feldwick 2002)
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
8/20
identification
Practicality
Guarantee
Badge Hedonistic
Optimization
Ethical
Continuity
Kapferer, (2004)
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
9/20
Elliot & Percy, (2007)
Brand loyalty
Value
Sustainablehigh prices
Competitiveadvantage
Low priceelasticity
Barriers tonew entrants
Less risky product and line
extensions
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
10/20
Kapferer, (2004) identifies 6 models in the management
of brand-product relationships.
Brand ArchitectureStrategy
Product
Line
Range Endorsing
Umbrella
Source
Mixed
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
11/20
The assignment of a particular name to one, and only
one, product (or product line) as well as one exclusive
positioning (Kapferer, 2004).
Offensive strategy - aim is to be market leader.
Helps customers perceive a difference between products.
Costly in terms of investment.
Reduces both negative and positive spillover.
Accor Group (hotels): Sofitel, Novotel, Ibis, All Season, etc.
Proctor & Gamble (beauty & grooming): Olay, Head &
Shoulders, Hugo Boss, Herbal Essences, etc.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
12/20
Offering one coherent response under a single name by
proposing many complimentary products (Kapferer, 2004).
Allows extending a concept beyond initial product.
Allows for creation of strong brand image.
Reduces distribution and new product costs.
Lynx: male fragrance and grooming products.
Dettol: antibacterial home care products.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
13/20
Bestows a single brand name and promotes through a
single promise a range of products belonging to the same
area of competence (Kapferer, 2004).
Communications can focus on a single brand name and
be generic rather than product specific.
New products can be readily incorporated into the brand
structure.
Brand name can be spread too thinly.
Birds Eye: frozen foods.
Green Giant: foods containing sweetcorn.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
14/20
The same brand supports several products in different
markets (Kapferer, 2004).
Each product has its own product name but is usually
referred by its brand name.
Allows capitalisation of a single brand name and
economies of scale on a global level.
Awareness and reputation used to enter new markets.
Brand image and value extension.
Canon: printers, cameras, photocopying machines.
Virgin: airline, railway, broadband, cosmetics, etc.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
15/20
Identical to the umbrella brand strategy except the
products have their own brand name (Kapferer, 2004).
Products have a brand name instead of a generic product
name, creating a double-brand structure.
Different to endorsement strategy in that the first name is
the strongest.
Appreciation and respect for the second brand name
comes first.
LOreal: Revitalift, Diesel, Giorgio Armani, Garnier, etc.
Kelloggs: All-Bran, Special K, Coco Pops, etc.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
16/20
The endorsing brand supports and assumes a secondary
position to the product brand (Kapferer, 2004).
Endorsing brand acts as a guarantor to the product brand.
Allows greater freedom of movement than a source brand.
Each product has its own image and personality.
Less expensive way of raising company profile.
Ford: Fiesta, Focus, Ka, Mondeo, etc.
Apple: iMac, iPod, iPhone.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
17/20
The six strategies are models
There are other models: see further reading.
In reality companies adopt mixed approaches.
Examples:
LOreal is a range brand for most cosmetics, a source
brand for most skin care products, and an endorsing brand
for most hair care products.
3M is an umbrella brand for medical adhesives, a source
brand for Post-It and an endorsing brand for Scotch, which
in turn is an umbrella brand for video tapes, glue-sticks
and sellotape.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
18/20
Parameters to take into account:
Corporate strategy
The business model
Cultural factors
Pace of innovation
Added value leverage
Resources
The brand vision
(Kapferer, 2004)
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
19/20
Use recommended textbooks to read about the
concepts discussed in this lecture.
Reading for next weeks seminar:
- Rajagopal and Sanchez, R. (2004). Conceptualanalysis of brand architecture and relationshipswithin product categories. Brand Management, Vol.11, No. 3, pp223-247.
-
8/2/2019 1 CBM Added Value %26 Brand Architecture
20/20
de Chernatony, L. (2006). From brand vision to brandevaluation: strategically building and sustaining brands.London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Elliott, R. and Percy, L. (2007). Strategic brand management.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feldwick, P. (2002). What is a brand? WARC Monograph,available from www.warc.com [accessed August 2009].
Kapferer, J. (2004). The new strategic brand management.London: Kogan-Page.
Rosenbaum-Elliot, R., Percy, L. and Pervan, S. (2011). StrategicBrand Management, 2nd ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press