1 beyond goldwater-nichols -- legislation in response to strategic security james r. locher iii...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to
Strategic Security
James R. Locher III
October 16, 2002
![Page 2: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
More Than an Intellectual Challenge
Reformers have the idea that change can be achieved by brute sanity.
-- George Bernard Shaw
![Page 3: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
National Security Council
• problem: still defined by post-World War II concept of national security – diplomacy, military, and intelligence
• four statutory members– president, vice president, secretary of state, secretary of
defense
• two statutory advisers– chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, director of central
intelligence
![Page 4: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
All Instruments of U.S. Power
“How will we fight and win this war? We will direct every resource at our command -- every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence, and every necessary weapon of war -- to the disruption and to the defeat of the global terror network.”
President George W. Bush, Address to Congress, September 20, 2001
![Page 5: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
National Security Council
• by statute, add three new members– Secretary of the Treasury– Attorney General – Secretary of Homeland Security
• highlight their national security responsibilities
• begin changes to culture
![Page 6: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Combating Terrorism
• problem: combating terrorism is now bifurcated• National Security Council
– counterterrorism -- overseas and domestic
– intelligence support for counterterrorism
– antiterrorism -- overseas
– consequence management -- overseas
• Homeland Security Council– antiterrorism -- domestic
– consequence management -- domestic
![Page 7: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Combating Terrorism
• second problem: unnecessary duplication– Department of Homeland Security and Office
of Homeland Security
• course of action– add Secretary of Homeland Security to
National Security Council– eliminate Homeland Security Council and
Office of Homeland Security
![Page 8: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Interagency Reform
• poor unity of effort
• 1961 -- Joint Staff – “it has been extremely difficult to achieve coordinated
interdepartmental planning”
• 1998 -- Army Training and Doctrine Command– “the diversity of the interagency, with each agency having
its own culture, hierarchy, bias, misperceptions, and unique perspectives, makes unity of effort difficult.”
– “low technical and procedural interoperability and the absence of a common vision”
![Page 9: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Interagency Reform
• problem: imbalance between departmental and national interests – parallels DoD mid-1980s problems
• addressed by Goldwater-Nichols Act
• defend departmental turf– “don’t tell them anything”– “don’t let them interfere with our activities”– “don’t let them get any of our money”
![Page 10: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Interagency Reform
• departments have little responsibility for the performance and success of the whole
– “see it as their first job to defend their function [department], to protect it against marauders in other functions [departments], to make sure ‘it doesn’t get pushed around.’” -- Peter Drucker
![Page 11: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Interagency Reform
• different visions • different cultures
– exercises, contingency plans, rapid-response teams, policy planning
• no common doctrine • different terminology• incompatible systems
![Page 12: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Interagency Reform
• Congress will offer little legislative help– committee jurisdictions -- major obstacle
• fix will have to come from executive branch
• one possibility– interagency study chartered by president– chaired by the vice president– considerable DoD interest
![Page 13: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Department of Homeland Security: Out of Many, One
• 170,000 employees
• 22 agencies
• 17 different sets of procedures
• little of unifying the department will be addressed in legislation– focused on structure
![Page 14: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Organizational Effectiveness
• SHARED VALUES -- agreed vision, purpose, and principles
• SYSTEMS -- management processes, procedures, and measurements
• STRUCTURE -- arrangement of components
• SKILLS -- core competencies; necessary capabilities and attributes of the organization
• STAFF -- attributes of personnel; needed qualifications and professional development
• STYLE -- leadership attitudes and behavior, organization's culture
• STRATEGY -- plan for achieving objectives
![Page 15: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Department of Homeland Security: Out of Many, One
• shared values -- unifying vision
• systems -- designed to promote integration; emphasis on outcomes
• skills -- ability to operate cross-department
• staff -- incentives for service in other elements; education programs
• style -- culture that highly values unity of effort; high-volume communications
![Page 16: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Department of Defense: Change-Resistant Culture
• “Yesterday’s winning formula ossifies into today’s conventional wisdom before petrifying into tomorrow’s tablets of stone.”
• strategic vulnerability in a world of accelerating change– greatest organizational weakness
• anticipate and adapt to change• change-enabling techniques
– strategic visioning -- renewal process
![Page 17: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Department of Defense: 1960s Management Doctrine
• outmoded hierarchical authoritarian model
• bloated bureaucracies
• ponderous processes
• input focus
• uncertain division of labor
• inattention to civilian personnel management
![Page 18: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Department of Defense: Revolution in Business Affairs
Secretary of Defense Cohen (1997):
“bring to the department management techniques and business practices that have restored American corporations to leadership in the marketplace.”
![Page 19: 1 Beyond Goldwater-Nichols -- Legislation in Response to Strategic Security James R. Locher III October 16, 2002](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072011/56649e3f5503460f94b2f6e8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Department of Defense: Revolution in Business Affairs
– new leadership concept
– unifying vision
– core functions
– information sharing
– personnel management
– performance goals
– cross-functional process teams