1 augmentin ® es clinical microbiology review sousan s. altaie, ph.d. clinical microbiology...

26
1 Augmentin ® ES Clinical Microbiology Review Sousan S. Altaie, Ph.D. Clinical Microbiology Reviewer Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products

Post on 18-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Augmentin® ES Clinical Microbiology Review

Sousan S. Altaie, Ph.D.

Clinical Microbiology Reviewer

Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products

2

Overview

• Introduction

• Provisional Breakpoints– In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity– Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic

Studies– Efficacy Studies in Animal Models of Infection

• Final Breakpoints– Efficacy Studies in Humans

3

Introduction

• Pending Applications for Determination of Susceptibility Breakpoints– Augmentin® 7:1 (45/6.4 mg/kg/day)

• Sponsor proposed amox/clav susceptible breakpoint, < 2.0 g/mL

– Augmentin® ES 14:1 (90/6.4 mg/kg/day) • Sponsor proposed amox/clav susceptible breakpoint,

< 4.0 g/mL

4

Provisional Breakpoints

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity

5

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity

• Data generated from: – Alexander Project (AP) 1997 – 1998 – International Surveillance Study (ISS) 1997-1998 – Clinical Microbiology Institute (CMI) 1999– Consultants in Anti-Infectives Surveillance and

Testing (CAST) 1999

6

7

In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity

Penicillin-Susceptible S. pneumoniae

Study Namox/clav

MIC90

amox/clav% Susc. @

< 2.0 g /mL

amox/clav% Susc. @

< 4.0 g /mL

AP- 1997 82 0.03 100 100

CAST 354 < 0.25 100 100

AP-1998 787 0.03 100 100

ISS 186 0.03 100 100

9

In Vitro Antimicrobial ActivityPenicillin-Intermediate S. pneumoniae

Study Namox/clav

MIC90

amox/clav% Susc. @

< 2.0 g /mL

amox/clav% Susc. @

< 4.0 g /mL

AP- 1997 19 1 100 100

CAST 87 1 100 100

AP-1998 217 1 100 100

ISS 65 1 100 100

10

In Vitro Antimicrobial ActivityPenicillin-Resistant S. pneumoniae

Study Namox/clav

MIC90

amox/clav% Susc. @< 2 g /mL

amox/clav% Susc. @< 4 g /mL

AP- 1997 23 4 65.2 95.7

CAST 111 4 80.2 92.8

AP-1998 452 8 64.6 79.9

ISS 96 8 79.2 86.5

11

Provisional Breakpoints

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies

12

Pharmacokinetic & Pharmacodynamic Studies In Animals

• Relationship between therapeutic efficacy and T>MIC– Neutropenic Murine Thigh Model

• Efficacy observed if T>MIC was at least 30% of the dosing interval

– Neutropenic Murine Pneumonia Model• Bacterial counts decreased if T>MIC exceeded 40% of

the dosing interval

13

Pharmacokinetic & Pharmacodynamic Studies In Humans

• Study 25000/382– Conclusion from extrapolated data

• T>MIC approximately 41% (4.9 h/12 h) of a dosing interval when an amoxicillin MIC of 4.0 g/mL is used in the calculation

• T>MIC approximately 51% (6.1 h/12 h) of a dosing interval when an amoxicillin MIC of 2.0 g/mL is used in the calculation

14

Pharmacokinetic & Pharmacodynamic Studies In Humans

• Study 25000/446– Conclusion from extrapolated data

• T>MIC approximately 38% (4.7 h/12 h) of a dosing interval when an amoxicillin MIC of 4.0 g/mL is used in the calculation

• T>MIC approximately 50% (6.0 h/12 h) of a dosing interval when an amoxicillin MIC of 2.0 g/mL is used in the calculation

15

Provisional Breakpoints

Efficacy Studies in Animal Models of Infection

16

Efficacy Studies in Animal Models of infection

• Rat experimental RTI caused by S. pneumoniae

• Treated with Augmentin 7:1 or 14:1

• Counted numbers of viable bacteria per lung

17

Log10 CFU/lungsStrains of

S.pneumoniae

AmoxMIC

g/mL

Control Augmentin7:1

Augmentin14:1

N1387 2 7.0+0.3 4.4+0.9* 2.6+0.9**

14319 4 6.8+0.6 6.3+0.5 4.3+0.8**

41010 4 7.1+0.5 6.1+0.6* 3.9+0.8**

RS1 8 6.0+0.6 6.1+0.7 5.9+0.7

* Significantly different from control (p<0.01)** Significantly different from control & amx/cla 45/6.4,

p<0.01

18

Final Breakpoints

Efficacy Studies in Humans

19

Efficacy Study In AOM

• Study 25000/536

• Open-label, Augmentin ES (14:1) for 10 days

• Tympanocentesis at baseline, on-therapy, and some at the time of clinical failure

• 521 patients, 157 S. pneumoniae, 41 PRSP, 9 with amox/clav MICs of > 4.0 g/mL

20

Augmentin ESITT Bacteriological Population

Success n/N (%)

S. pneumoniae alone or mixedamox/clav MIC (g/mL)

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51.02.04.08.0

2/276/8011/12

5/512/13

2/23/3

27/293/35/6

--(95)(92)

--(92)

----

(93)----

21

Augmentin ESPP Bacteriological Population

Success n/N (%)

S. pneumoniae alone or mixedamox/clav MIC (g/mL)

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51.02.04.08.0

2/262/628/84/4

10/102/23/3

22/233/33/4

--(100)

----

(100)----

(96)----

22

Augmentin ESPP Clinical Response at TOC

Success n/N (%)

S. pneumoniae alone or mixedamox/clav MIC (g/mL)

0.0160.030.060.120.250.51.02.04.08.0

1/158/738/114/57/92/21/2

14/242/31/5

--(80)(73)

--(78)

----

(58)----

23

Amox/Clav Breakpoint Discussions

• Important Note– Clinical success rate for isolates with MICs

< 1.0 g/mL is ~ 79% – Clinical success rate for isolates with MICs

>2.0 g/mL is ~ 53% – Clinical success rate for isolates with MICs

>4.0 g/mL is ~ 38%

24

Amox/Clav Breakpoint Discussions

• The amox/clav MIC frequency distribution histograms for S. pneumoniae indicate a bimodal distribution separated at the current FDA approved susceptible breakpoint of 0.5 g/mL – PSSP and PISP isolates which have amox/clav MICs

of < 1.0 g/mL – PRSP isolates which have amox/clav MICs of > 4.0

g/mL

• These two populations should be examined separately when setting breakpoints

25

26

Issue For Discussion

Considering the bimodal distribution of S. pneumoniae and the clinical failure rates for patients with isolates having amox/clav MICs > 2.0 g/mL what would be the most informative susceptibility breakpoint for S. pneumoniae against amox/clav?

< 1.0, < 2.0, or < 4.0 g/mL