-1 · a review of document co-4022-d, decontamination and waste processing (building 889),...

88
;;\v1S. J.G. ~~E3REFIA. D.W. :GAY. RE. September 14,1994 I 94-RF-09541 UCNl UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET Vern F. Witherill Acting Director for Decontamination and Decommissioning Planning Division DOE, RFFO I I .. - - _. Attn: W. N. Fitch COMPLETION OF MILESTONE 130030102 - TRD-058-94 Action: None Required Enclosed is the draft Sampling and Analysis Plan for Pilot Project Number Five, Building 889. Submission of thls plan completes milestone 1300301 02. This plan was originally due on August 15, 1994, It has been delayed due to the lack of contracted resources to develop the plan as had origipally been anticipated and the need to closely coordinate development with the Waste Identification and Characterization, Sample Management Off ice, Field Sampling Team, and Statistical A4alysis Organizations. Additional delay was caused by the search for a Sampling and Analysis Plan template that would expedite approval by all participating review organizations. Although the draft report is being submitted beE:ind the original schedule, the quality of the product has been enhanced by the close coordination with the abcve mentioned organizations. The Lessons Learned by the Decontamination bnd Decommissioning (D&D) Program in the development of this plan will make execution ofthis and future projects more efficient. As a I result oi coordination with the Waste correspondence between the Health (CDH) was revealed substances that is required on and Characterization organization, (DOE) and the Colorado Department of the amount oi sampling for hazardous ' Should you have any questions, please contabt S Anthony Tome at extension 4072. Senior Program Manager Decontamination and Decommissioning SIGNATURE DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATIO~ AET:crw R - C€&%%UTION OFFICE Orig. and 1 cc - V. F. Witherill IN REPLY 0 RFP CC NO: ,v/ fi E nciosure: As Stated ACTION ITEM STATUS 0 PARTIAUOPEN J CLOSED LTR APPROVALS: ORIG TYPIST INITIALS &-'cfLLl -1 ! IA-A-000308 / cfar' .-

Upload: others

Post on 27-May-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

;;\v1S. J.G. ~~E3REFIA. D.W. :GAY. R E .

September 14, 1994

I

94-RF-09541

UCNl UNCLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET

Vern F. Witherill Acting Director for Decontamination and Decommissioning Planning Division DOE, RFFO

I

I

.. - - _ .

Attn: W. N. Fitch

COMPLETION OF MILESTONE 130030102 - TRD-058-94

Action: None Required

Enclosed is the draft Sampling and Analysis Plan for Pilot Project Number Five, Building 889. Submission of thls plan completes milestone 1300301 02. This plan was originally due on August 15, 1994, It has been delayed due to the lack of contracted resources to develop the plan as had origipally been anticipated and the need to closely coordinate development with the Waste Identification and Characterization, Sample Management Off ice, Field Sampling Team, and Statistical A4alysis Organizations. Additional delay was caused by the search for a Sampling and Analysis Plan template that would expedite approval by all participating review organizations.

Although the draft report is being submitted beE:ind the original schedule, the quality of the product has been enhanced by the close coordination with the abcve mentioned organizations. The Lessons Learned by the Decontamination bnd Decommissioning (D&D) Program in the development of this plan will make execution ofthis and future projects more efficient. As a

I

result o i coordination with the Waste correspondence between the Health (CDH) was revealed substances that is required

on and Characterization organization, (DOE) and the Colorado Department of

the amount oi sampling for hazardous

' Should you have any questions, please contabt S Anthony Tome at extension 4072.

Senior Program Manager Decontamination and Decommissioning

SIGNATURE DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATIO~ AET:crw R- C€&%%UTION OFFICE Orig. and 1 cc - V. F. Witherill

IN REPLY 0 RFP CC NO: ,v/ f i E nciosu re:

As Stated ACTION ITEM STATUS 0 PARTIAUOPEN

J CLOSED LTR APPROVALS:

ORIG TYPIST INITIALS &-'cfLLl

-1 !

IA-A-000308 / cfar' . -

Page 2: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

DRAFT BUILDING 889 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

.. .

Rocky Flats Plant

I

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Rocky Fiats Plant Golden, Colorado

SEPTEMBER, 1994

Page 3: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

C l i L I d ~ U l C 1

94-RF-09541 , L:

Page '2 of 87 ' !

. . - . . .. . . .~ .

. .. ..- . . . - . . . -.., .-..

.. . . - Manual No.: MER-94-00049 .

0 Revision: 2 of 23 . . -. . . ~ ~ ~ - . . - ., Page:

Organization: ER / D&D

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan

. .~ . ..

~ - .. ... s . ...

Effective Date: -

APPROVED BY:

~

D&D Project Manager

Field Sampling Team

~

Sample Management Office

Quality Assurance Program Manager

Waste Identification & Characterization

Date

Date

Date

Date

Page 4: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

I I x

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

RFER-94-OoO49 0

3 of 23 L

- ER I D&D - _

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page

. . .

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . Background Building Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

7 7

OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . . . . . . . . 9

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Building Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 WlSRC Books . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . , . , . . , . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 ProcessKnowledge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

SAMPLING APPROACH, LOCATIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Sample Locations . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 14

Room Surfaces . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Room 104, Material Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Room 105, Plenum Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . 16 Room 106, Pressure Wash Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Room 107, Pressure Lock/Access Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Room 108, Crusher/Baler Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 18

Potenially Contaminated Surfaces . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Room 106 North East Bay Doors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Room 106 South East Opening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Room 106 South Door Leading To Room 101 . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Room 112 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

Collecting Hazardous Material Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Sample Collection and Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 20

ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Data Needs ............................................................ 21 AnalyticalMethods ...................................................... 21

Page 5: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

I

.... .. . .

Enclosure 1 94-RF-09541- '

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

DATA MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS .................................... 23

I QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALIN CONTROL ................................. 23

I , REFERENCES .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Page 6: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

RF/ER-94-00049 - -

5of23 . 0

ER / D&D - _ .. -. - -.

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX A:

APPENDIX B:

APPENDIX C:

DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN - .

QUALITY ASSURANCE ADDENDUM

Attachment 1 : Title 40 of The Codes of Federal Regulation, Part 264, Appendix IX

APRIL 6, 1987 WlSRC

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 4-1 Building 889 Sample Locations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 5-1 Samples and Analytical Methods ............................ 14

Page 7: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

~ I ~ C I O S U I ~ I 94-RF-09541 Page 6 of 87

~ __ - .-. ,, '. . .'" .+-,

*,",>;&-*.&&&& . I

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

. .

LIST OF ACRONYMS

. - .. .

. - . . . . .

BNA

COC

DMP

EPA

GRRASP

LDR

PCB

QAA

QA/QC

RCRA

SAP

SVOA

svoc TCLP

VOA

voc

Base/Neutral/Acid - - - _ _

Chain-of-Custody

Data Management Plan

Environmental Protection Agency

General Radiochemistry and Routine Analytical Services Protocol

Land Disposal Restrictions

Polychlorinated Biphenyl

Quality Assurance Addendum

Q u a I it y Ass u ran ce/Q ua I i t y Control

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

Sampling and Analysis Plan

Semi-volatile Organic Analysis

Semi-volatile Organic Compound

Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure

Volatile Organic Analysis

Volatile Organic Compound

,

Page 8: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 .

Page 7 of 87 94-RF-09541 i

- . . e.. 1. - -. I

. ---- EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: FWER-94-00049 Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0

Page: Organization:

I . . . 7 of 23 - ER / D&D '

.. _. . _...- -.- .- . .-- . -

- . . . . . . . .- -. 1 .O INTRODUCTION

EG&G Rocky Flats is preparing to decontaminate and remove excess equipment in Building 889 as a D&D pilot project. a means to identify hazardous materials to ensure compliance to applicable State and Federal environmental laws and statutes. on the levels of hazardous waste contamination found, further sampling and changes to this pian may be required. Sampling in this plan is only for characterization purposes.

This document provides

Depending

I I A separate plan developed by Radiological Engineering which addresses ~ radiological sampling for building 889.

1.2 Background Building lnformatibn

Located on Central Avenue in the 800 area, building 889 has served primarily as a decontamination' facility for uranium and beryllium contaminated equipment originating outside the PA. Size reduction and baling operations for contaminated materials were carried out on a regular basis in the building. building as part of the size reduction operation. in 1987 for building expansion. Due to problems with the exhaust air system and new filter plenum fire suppression problems, the building never became operational again.

HEPA filters were also crushed in the Operations were ceased

A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination. On an infrequent basis, caustic steam cleaning appears to have been used from the procedure. Decontamination was also accomplished using other unspecified hazardous chemicals including acids, caustics, and solvents. listed in the procedure include Clayton Steam Cleaning Compound (Caustic) and Ospho Acid.

Specific chemicals

Page 9: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

. ... I

....-- P

. ._I .. . -- , . . -. . . ... .-- .- Manual No.: RFER-94-00049 , . Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 . .

Page: 8 of23 - - - ._--: ER / D&D I ".-.....

EG&G ROCKY FLATS ~

. . ___- .-

.. ~~ . . Organization: - . . . . . . i Y , _ ,, ... -. - . .

Process waste consisted of solids, liquids, and gases. wastes typically included crushed HEPA filters and size reduced materials. and 55 gallon drums. Depending on the material, the packaged materials were sent to building 776 for final packaging, or building 664 for storage. Collected through floor drains, liquid process wastes gravity flowed to a two compartment 2000 gallon total capacity tank in building 886. Presently the tank is blanked off and operationally empty. the decontamination process entered two floor exhaust pits and filtered in a plenum. stack on the west side of the building.

Solid process

The solids were packaged in 4-foot by 4-foot by 7- fOOt crates

Vapors from

From the plenum, the vapors were ducted through a 30 foot tall

Building records, waste stream and proc'ess knowledge, and WlSRC books provide the basis for determining which hazardous constituents to sample for. However, because essentially all process buildings outside of the Protected Area used building 889 for decontamination, the probability of hazardous materials not normally associated with building 889 is quite high. This sampling plan addresses this problem ensures these hazardous

I materials are identified.

7/38 I

Page 10: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

RFER-94-00049 0

9 of 23 ER / D&D

2.0 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE

- . The objective of this Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) is to identify the specific analytical needs, sampling requirements, data handling requirements and associated quality assurance/control (QA/QC) requirements for building 889. will ensure competent decision making for Hazardous materials decontamination requirements and final disposition of building 889, as well as surplus and scrap materials from the building.

The entire sampling and analysis process

Specifically, the scope and contents of this SAP will include:

e Defining appropriate field methods and screening criteria

Describing the analytical requirements and appropriate methods Developing QA/QC requirements including data quality objectives

e Identifying the locations and number of samples to be taken e

e

e Generating adequate information for characterization, storage and/or disposal purposes

Page 11: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 94-RF-09541; y t Page 10 of 67

. -_ -. . -;t”?;fy&j:

. -. +. 4.

- -~ .I-. 2 I . -. - ~ I .._.. - . .

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: WER-94-00049 . . . . . .

Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan . Revision: 0 10 of 23 - .-__ - . . __ -. - -

. .. Page:

. - . . . .. Organization: ER / D&D & . . . - , . .

. -

- . - -.. - 4- ,:- . .

. .. . ~ . .. .._ .. - -. _ . A i _

I

I 3.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IDEMTIFICATION

Potential hazardous waste constituents for building 889 were identified through building documentation, WlSRC Books, and process knowledge. detailed below in sections 3.1 to 3.3. Detailed documents containing records of equipment containing hazardous materials decontaminated in building 889 were not evident in a review of building records.

I

I

Each source of information and the information obtained is

3.1 Building Documentation

Several building log books and records were found in room 101 in building 889. containing hazardous materials decontaminated in building 889 were not evident in a review of the building records, that due to the lack of details in the building log books about the types of materials decontaminated and unknown hazardous waste constituents on the materials, building records are of limited use in establishing the sample program. Processing (Building 889), has provided the most information on waste streams created by the building of all documents found in the building.

Detailed documents containing records of equipment

D&D has determined

Document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste

3.2 WlSRC Books

Five versions of WlSRC books were identified and obtained from Waste Identification and Control (WIC) for building 889. and 5.0 were reviewed for hazardous waste streams. A WISRC Book dated April 6, 1987 was also reviewed for the building but was not assigned a version number. None of the WISRC books contain a complete history of waste steams for the building. books were reviewed to determine hazardous waste streams. From these WlSRCs it has been found that in WlSRC version 5.0, the current

Versions 2.0, 3.0, 3.2,

Thus, all prior versions of the

Page 12: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure i .

Page 11 of 87 94-RF-09541

- u

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

RF/ER-94-00049 0

11 of23 ER / D&D

version, no hazardous waste streams currently exist in the building.

Versions 2.0, 3.0, and 3.2 identify the following EPA waste codes:

EPA Waste Code Description

DO06 Cadmium

DO07 C h romi um

DO08 Lead

FOOI Halogenated Solvents

F002 Halogenated Solvents

F003 Non Halogenated Solvents

What appears to be the first WISRC, which does not have a version number, dated April 6, 1987, indicates the following EPA waste codes through waste tank sample analysis:

DO03 Reactivity

DO04 Arsenic

DO05 Barium

DO06 Cadmium

DO07 Chromium

DO09 Mercury

Page 13: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

W/ER-94-00049 0

12of23 .

ER / D&D

DO08

DO11 - -

FOO1

F002

F003

F005

F006

FO19

PO1 5

F024

u002

U028

U080

U151

u220

U228

Lead

Si lver _.

Methylene Cloride, 1,1,1 -Tricloroethane

Methylene Cloride

Non Halogenated Solvents (Xylenes)

To1 ue ne

Cadmium, Chromium, Nickel

Chromium

Beryll ium

Toluene

Acetone

bis(2-Ethylhexy1)Phthalate

Methylene Cloride

Mercury

Toluene

Tricloroethene

Page 14: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

.Enclosure 1 , 94-RF-09541 '

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

WER-94-00049 . 0

ER / D&D 13of23 . .

Specific values for these hazardous constituents are attached in Appendix C in the April 6, 1987 WISRIC.

3.3 Process Knowledge -. -

Building operations were discussed with Mickey Martinez, the building Operations Manager during the late 1980s. the WISRC information with the addition of possible beryllium contamination. decontamination of materials that were in the 1969 fire. This information appears to be confirmed by the April 6, 1987 chemical anaylsis which indicates a Pu-239 level of 18 +/-4 pCi/ml. Other specific values are attached in Appendix C in the April 6, 1987 WISRIC.

The discussions reconfirmed

Some employees stated that the building was used for

Page 15: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 ,

Page 14 of 87 94-RF-09541 j

_ _ _ . 1.. - - < + . .

-.-. 1

--

. I -,-A EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

- - I . . RFER-94-00049

0

ER / D&D I .- . . 14 of 23 _. -

, . . . . . _ . .- .

. -~ . . .. - . . . . , . I

.-

4.0 SAMPLING APPROACH, LOCATIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS

_. - Using process knowledge, WlSRC and building history information, a non statistical methodology has been developed to identify hazardous material contamination in the building if it exists. If hazardous material contamination is found, this sampling plan will be revised to provide further information on the hazardous material contamination areal extent. was decided upon due to the complexity of the sampling problem.

A non statistical approach for selecting sample locations

The number of characterization rinsates needed was determined by using process knowledge and WlSRC information to qualitatively access the potential extent of contamination .in the building. duplicates will be taken and their locations are identified below.

A total of six

Figure 1-1 contains a layout of the rooms in building 889 that will be sampled and the sample locations.

4.1 Sample Locations

Sections 4.1 .I and 4.1.3 identify the locations for hazardous material sampling for room surfaces and equipment. surfaces such as filter plenum ducts are not covered in this plan. 4-1 contains the locations of the sampling points in the building. '

Interior and non-accessible Figure

Page 16: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 ,

, Page ,I6 of 87, ;z.;j . - - !-z

94-RF-09541 ’

-\ -_ - _ .-

I - . ---_ * -

-s - YL RFER-94-00049 Ik

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 - .. _ _ Page: 16 of23 -

Organization: ER / D&D -

4.1.1 Room Surfaces

Rooms 104, 105,106, 107, 108, and 112 require sampling to identify hazardous materials. below.

Each room’s sampling locations are explained

4.1.1.1 Room 104. Material Storage

Room 104’s primary use was as a storage room. may have been introduced i f hazardous materials were stored in the room.

Some contamination

A total of three samples and one duplicate will be taken in the following locations:

1) On the bottom surface of the drain in the pit (Sample # l ) .

2) On the floor surface in the in the geometric center of the room excluding the pit offset (Sample #2), (Duplicate # l ) .

3) On the floor surface extending two feet into room 104 from room 106 centered mid way on the door opening (Sample #3).

4.1.1.2 Room 105. Plenum Room

Room 105’s primary use was access to the filter plenum. Some contamination may have been introduced if hazardous materials entered the room through the door between room 104 and 105.

One sample will be taken in the following location:

1) On the surface of the floor one half .the distance between the plenum

Page 17: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

~~~ ~

cnclo5cll. ' . 94-RF-09541 . page 17 Of 87.

-. ._..I . -ix.*u- Lev* _I ***IC . - .-.< . _ . - I . _ -,-. , . n - . I '

-..- ~

. ....

. I

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RF/ER-94-00049 Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0

- . . .- . . Page: 17 of 23

ER / D&D Organization: .- .. - . - - -. - - ..

. . - _-. .. . ". - . . -_ -.-.. .

. .- .. . ___. . . . - . . door and the entry door to room 105 into room 104 (Sample #3).

4.1 .I .3 Room 106. Pressure Wash Room

Room 106's primary use was as a high pressure wash decontamination room. Hazardous material contamination should be well dispersed due to the dispersive nature of the pressure wash system.

A total of 9 samples and one duplicate will be taken in the following locations:

1) On the bottom surface of the drain in the south pit (Sample #5).

2) On the bottom surface of the drain in the north west pit (Sample #6).

3) On the floor surface mid way between the northeast corner of the south pit to the east wall or door (Sample #7).

4) On the floor surface mid way from the south side of the door opening into room 104 to the east wall or door of room 106 (Sample #8).

5) On the floor surface mid way between the northeast corner of the west pit to the east wall or door (Sample #9).

6) On the south wall surface two feet from the floor mid way from the east and west walls (Sample #lo)

7) On the west wall surface two feet from the floor mid way from the door to room 107 and the northwest pit (Sample #11)

8) On the east wall surface two feet from the floor mid way from the two large doors (Sample #12), (Duplicate #2).

Page 18: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

-1 Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 - 1

Organization: ER / D&D e.

I EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: WER-94-00049 - .f il

- -1

Page: 18 of 23

t. 31 -. - 1

- . 9) On the north wall surface two feet from the floor mid way from the east and west walls (Sample #13)

4.1 .I .4 Room 107. Pressure LocWAccess Room

Room 107's primary use was as a pressure IocWAccess between rooms 106 and 108.

One sample will be taken in the following location:

1) On the floor surface in the geometric center (Sample #14).

4.1.1.5 Room 108. Crusher/Baler Room

Room 108's primary use was to house the crusher and compactor.

One sample and one duplicate will be taken in the following location:

-

1) On the floor surface in the geometric center ignoring the wall housing the pit in room 106 (Sample #15), (Duplicate #3).

2) On the floor surface directly in front of the compactor (Sample #16).

3) On the floor surface directly in front of the bailer (Sample #17).

Two samples are to be taken on each piece of equipment.

Samples are to be taken at a point where material would have been in contact with the crushing or bailing operation.

Sample #18, # I 9 - baler Sample #20, #21 - compactor

Page 19: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

- ,....L-.* - - _..- - . .- --... ̂ I ___--_ --

- c I 4.1.3 Poteniallv Contaminated Surfaces ~

Due to movement of hazardous materials and personnel, the potential for spreading hazardous material contamination is possible. - _ . - _

4.1.3.1 Room 106 North East Bav Doors

On the northeast side of room 106, there are folding doors at the border of room 112 which were able to be closed during the wash operation. Although room 112 was built in 1987, recent foot traffic may have spread hazardous material contamination to the room.

One sample and duplicate will be taken from the center of a measured rectangle that extends four feet out to the east of room 106 as long as the folding door opening in room 112 (Sample #22), (Duplicate #4).

4.1.3.2 Room 106 South East Openinq

On the southeast side of room 106, there is an opening to room 112. As with the northeast door opening, recent foot traffic may have spread hazardous material contamination to the room.

One sample will be taken from the center of a measured rectangle that. extends four feet out to the east of room 106 as long as the opening in room 112 (Sample #23).

4.1.3.3 Room 106 South Door Leading To Room 101

On the south side of room 106, there is a door leading to room 101. Foot traffic may have spread hazardous material contamination to the room.

One sample and one duplicate will be taken from the center of a measured rectangle that extends three feet out to the south of room 106

Page 20: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

t I j C l L ) 3 U l C 1

94-R F-0954 1 Page 20 of 87

.. . - . --.-+-&- - ---.. - -

. %

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RFER-94-00049 Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0

20 of 23 _ - 0 Page: Organization: ER / D&D -

- as long as the door opening in room 101 (Sample #27), (Duplicate #5).

4.1.3.4 Room 112

Foot traffic may have spread hazardous material contamination from the room 106 to 112.

1) One sample will be taken one third the distance from the north wall to the south wall centered between the west wall and the vertical plane created by the mezzanine (Sample #24).

2) One sample will be taken two thirds the distance from the north wall to the south wall centered between the west wall and the vertical plane created by the mezzanine (Sample #25).

3) One sample and one duplicate will be taken one half the distance from the vertical plane created by the mezzanine and the south wall centered on door opening #5 (Sample #26), (Duplicate #6).

4 . 2 Collecting Hazardous Material Samples

A trained sampling team using adequate protection from all hazards will collect rinsates of the surfaces and equipment for characterization purposes. One rinsate will be collected from each potentially contaminated surface to characterize the surface location as detailed above in sectio~4.1.1 to 4.1.3.

4 .3 Sample Collection and Handling

The collection of all rinsates will be in accordance with the appropriate procedures as described above. The collection of rinsates will also follow procedure F0.13 "Containerization, Preserving, Handling and Shipping of Soil and Water Samples", for the containerization, preserving, handling and shipping of environmental samples. The

Page 21: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

. . EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building S89 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

RFER-94-00049 , 0

21 of 23 ER I D&D

screening of samples for shipment will follow procedure FO.18 "Environmental Sample Radioactivity Screening" prior to shipment. the event the samples are "hot" procedure F0.25 "Shipment of Radioactive Materials Samples" will be used for sample shipment. 3-1 defines the number of specific samples to be collected for each activity including QC samples.

In

Table

5.0 ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS

The analytical specifications for this project will follow the protocol described in the General Radiochemistry and Routine Analytical Services Protocol (GRRASP) (EG&G, 1993b). The GRRASP describes the protocol for analytical methods that will be used, detection limits, holding times, laboratory COC, extraction/preparation criteria and reporting requirements.

5.1 Data Needs

The data needs for this project include the collection of sufficient information of adequate quality to meet the specific objectives of the project. As described above, this includes characterization of the surfaces for RCRA constituents and beryllium. for the removal action are described in the data quality objectives section of the QAA.

The quality requirements

5 .2 Analytical Methods

The analytical methods that will be used for this project can be found in Table 5-1. that will be analyzed by each method. The actual analytes for each method are included as a part of the QAA. Gross alphdbeta characterization provides information on the total content.

Note this table also includes the total number of samples

Am, Pu, and U As such, these isotopes will not be identified individually.

Page 22: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 22 of 87 94-RF-09541

I 35

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RFER-94-00049 Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0

Page: 22 of 23 Organization: ER / D&D

RCRA RCRA Characteristics Characteristics

SW-846 Table 45 Metal By Metals

EPA-CLP SOW Table 44

BNA By SW-846 svocs 8270A Table 44

VOA By SW-846 VOAs 8240A Table 44

PCB Only By PCB 1 EPA-CLPSOW

I GRRASP Specific Radiological Screening 1 GRRASP Specific Gross AlphdBeta I

Table 26

Table 5-1 Rinsates and Analytical Methods

Hazardous Material Characterization (27) Duplicate for Hazardous Material Characterization (6) Trip Blanks for Hazardous Material Characterization (2) Hazardous Material Characterization (27) Duplicate for Hazardous Material Characterization (6) Trip Blanks for Hazardous Material Characterization (2) Hazardous Material Characterization (27) Duplicate for Hazardous Material Characterization (6) Trip Blanks for Hazardous Material Characterization (2) Hazardous Material Characterization (27) Duplicate for Hazardous Material Characterization (6) Trip Blanks for Hazardous Material Characterization (2) Hazardous Material Characterization (27) Duplicate for Hazardous Material Characterization (6) Trip Blanks for Hazardous Material Characterization (2) Radiological Screening for Shipping (27) Radiological Conformation (27)

Rinsate (2) Duplicate for Confirmation (6)

Number of Samples

35

35

35

35

35

27

Page 23: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 23 of '87 i 94-RF-095414;

2 ..-._-_ . .. .. ' . -.:.:.q -*;l,.;F~

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Draft Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision:

Page: Organization:

RFER-94-00049 0

23 of 23 ER / D&D

6.0 DATA MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS

The specific data management requirements for this SAP are defined and described in Appendix A, "Data Management Plan" (DMP). This DMP will be followed for all data collection, compilation and dissemination activities for this project.

7.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

The specific Quality Assurance/Quality Control requirements for this SAP are defined and described in Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Addendum" (QAA). project.

This QAA will be followed for all QA/QC activities for this

8.0 REFERENCES

EPA 1986, Test Methods for evaluating Solid Waste: PhysicalKhemical Methods; Third Edition (SW-846)

EG&G 1993b, General Radiochemistry and Routine Analytical Services Protocol (G RRASP)

. . .. . - . - -

, . _ - .. .. -. _.

. . -. .

Page 24: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

- . _.. - 94-RF-09541 ._ . Page 24 of 87 ;-?

,..- I.... DRAFT BUILDING 889 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

APPENDIX A - DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN

Rocky Flats Plant

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Rocky Flats Plant Golden, Colorado

September, 1994

Page 25: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 .-;:: 94-RF-09541.'- ; ..

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: FWER-00049 Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan

Hazardous Material Sampling Organization: ER/D&D . '

Revision:

~ - - _ ,... ". i Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page:

. . .. .- .... ..

. -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

TITLEPAGE . . . . . . . . I.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

LlSTOF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES AND QUALIFICATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 5

2.1 ProjectManager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.2 Project Data Manager.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.3 RFEDS Coordinator . . . , . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.4 Data Verifier . . . . . , . . . , , . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.5 Field Data Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

2.6 QNQC Officer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . 8

DATA HANDLING SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT, DATA BACKUP, AND

SECURITY PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

3.1 Data Handling and Storage Systems . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

3.2 Database Backup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 9

3.2.1 Field Data Acquisition Backup and Security Procedures 9

3.2.2 Backup and Security Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

.. .. _ _ ~

... ..

3.0

4.0 DOCUMENTATION . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

4.1 Data Acquisition Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

4.2 Transmittal of Field Data to Project Data Manager . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

4.3 Data receipt Confirmation . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 11

Page 26: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 . .

Page 26 of 87 94-RF-09541

I ,

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B . Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Manual No . . Revision: Page:

MER-00049 .

0 3 of 19

ER / D&D

Section Page

5.0 DATA MANAGEMENT . DATA TRACKING. DATA ENTRY. AND

DATA PROOFING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

5.1 Manually Collected Field Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

5.2 RFEDS Analytical Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

5.3 Data Entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

5.3.1 Manual Data Entry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Corrections and Changes to Sample Data . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

5.4 Data Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5.5 Final QC Review . . . . . . . . . . . . ; .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5.3.2

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1-1

Figure 5-1

Figure 5-2

Figure 5-3

Figure 5-4

Figure 5-5

Figure 5-6

SUMMARY OF DATA SOURCES AND DATA FLOW . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

MANUAL DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM FLOWCHART . . . . . . . . . 12

FIDLER MEASUREMENT FORM ............................. 13

HNu MEASUREMENT FORM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

SAMPLE COLLECTION FORM ............................... 15

DATA FLOW FOR ANALYTICAL DATA ........................ 17

DATA CORRECTION/CHANGE FORM ........................ 18

Page 27: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

" . ?.. A . .. - _.- .

* - r

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: HER-00049 Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 4of 19 - I

Hazardous Material Sampling Organization: ER/D&D .. .

1 .o INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this Data Management Plan (DMP) is to support the Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan and to identify the mechanisms and procedures for the efficient and accurate transfer of data from collection/generation of the data through its end-use. This is achieved by identifying the sources of data, establishing systematic procedures for quality controVquality assurance, and creating a suitable database to allow end users the appropriate access to meet project requirements and to establish appropriate security and back-up measures to ensure data integrity. The DMP identifies and defines sample documentation, sample tracking, data entry, data proofing, data reporting, and data management personnel responsibilities.

The Building 889 project will involve the collection and analysis of data from several sources:

Screening parameters collected manually including organic vapor

Initial screening samples analyzed off-site for shipping purposes. Tangible analytical data generated from off-site laboratory testing of hazardous

concentrations

material confirmation

This DMP has been developed to promote the proper and complete management of scientific and technical data that will be generated from theBuilding 889 sampling activity. The primary purpose of a DMP is to communicate to personnel collecting, using, and managing information how it will be recorded, stored, accessed, and reviewed. Procedures are defined and implemented to ensure that data are collected, entered, and stored in a secure, controlled, and retrievable manner to accurately and efficiently transfer data into useful information. This plan addresses the planning, implementation, and responsibilities to optimize data management and use of the RFEDS.

This DMP focuses principally on the data management and data handling. Detailed discussion of peripheral activities (Le,, field data collection methods etc.) are described in the main portion of the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP). RFEDS will be the repository for all data generated during this project.

Tracking and verification of data at each stage of the project is important. The data

Page 28: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 28 of 87 ~

94-RF-09541 i

, - , 1 - j ,

. ..

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

FSER-00049 0

5 of 19 ER/D&D . .- - - ..

. .- tracking procedures identified in this DMP vary according to the data collection method employed. Figure 1-1 provides a summary of the data sources and the flow of the data.

2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES AND QUALIFICATIONS -

Support staff for the data management tasks includes all personnel involved in data acquisition, quality control (QC), and data processing. The designated staff are responsible for implementing and carrying out data management activities according to this plan. All personnel shall be qualified to perform the tasks assigned to them.

The primary personnel responsible for data management are the Project Manager, Project Data Manager, RFEDS Coordinator, Field Data Coordinator, Data Verifier and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QNQC) Officer. The responsibilities for these positions are summarized in the following sections.

2.1 Project Manager

The Project Manager will be responsible for ensuring that all data are collected, processed, and stored in a manner consistent with this DMP and in compliance with F0.14 “Field Data Management”. Data ,management support personnel will report to the Project Manager with any problems that may impact the integrity of the data and/or the removal action. The Project Manager will also coordinate sample shipping with the Lockheed Analytical Labs, or other Analytical Lab, and attain RFEDS assigned sample numbers and location codes to use on the Chain of Custody (COC) forms.

2.2 Project Data Manager

The Project Data Manager has overall responsibility for the data management program including systematic updating of data. This person will:

Establish the appropriate data management protocols as summarized in this DMP; Instruct the Field Data Coordinator in the proper procedures (Figure 1-1, Summary of Data Sources and Data Flow); and Oversee the flow of the data from the field through DATACAP and RFEDS.

i

Page 29: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

cnciosure 1

Page 29 of 87 .,. _-.. " - --- ,. -.-

94-RF-09541 ,

. -

Sample Collection

. . ..- . _-

Tracking Field b (COC) 4 Measurement

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page: .

Sample Collection

RFER-00049 0

6of 19 .. ER / D&D . .

Tracking Field b (COC) 4 Measurement

I .

Figure 1-1

SUMMARY OF DATA SOURCES AND DATA FLOW

Field Instruments

Sample Screening

Analytical

RFEDS Shipping/ Packaging

Excavation Decisions

Final Report

Page 30: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

ciicloswe I

Page 30 of 87 94-RF-09541

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

RJ?/ER-00049 0

7 of 19 ER / D&D

.. . -

The Project Data Manager will report directly to the Project Manager. In addition, the Project Data Manager will:

I 1 0

0

Implement the appropriate QNQC procedures and document control; Directly communicate with data management personnel concerning procedures

Accept data from the field, the screening laboratory and RFEDS; Perform completeness check of field and RFEDS data; Perform technical verification of field and RFEDS data; Oversee manual data entry into DATACAP; and Document data distributions and users of final data.

for data transmittal and problem resolution; 0

0

0

0

0

2.3 RFEDS Coordinator

The RFEDS Coordinator will be responsible for:

0 Ensuring the RFEDS data requested by data users is complete and in the

Ensuring that data are preserved, retrievable, traceable, and available for

Executing the proper procedures for the handling of the computer-based data

appropriate format;

response to regulatory agency requirements; 0

0

2.4 Data Verifier

The Data Verifier ensures that the data recorded, are the same as the data recorded on the field data forms to RFEDS.

2 . 5 Field Data Coordinator

The Field Data Coordinator is responsible for:

0 Ensuring that all data management procedures are correctly implemented in the field;

0 Ensuring that all data and samples are assigned appropriate identification

Overseeing the completion fo the field data forms in the field.

numbers;

0

Page 31: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 31 of 87, 94-RF-09541

I---

_. . .

- .

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RFER-00049 Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 8 of 19 Hazardous Material Sampling Organization: ER / D&D

-

Q Communicating with the Project Data Manager to discuss the status of data collection activities and to verify that transmitted data are complete, correct, and accompanied by a transfer form.

-

The Field Data Coordinator or designee will be responsible for completeness of the data package and will report to the Project Data Manager.

2 .6 QNQC Officer

The QNQC officer will ensure that procedures are carried out in accordance with this DMP. The QNQC Officer will report to the Project Manager or designee.

3.0 DATA HANDLING SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT, DATA BACKUP, AND SECURITY PROCEDURES

3.1 Data Handling System

All data will be transfered from the laboratory reports directly into RFEDS. DATACAP will not be used with this sampling program.

3.2 Database Backup

3.2.1 Field Data Acquisition, Backup, and Security Procedures

Because the laboratory reports will be directly entered into RFEDS, data backup and security procedures are not required for the data.

4.0 DOC U MENTATION

4 .1 Data Acquisition Qocumentation

It is necessary to record detailed information so that data acquisition can be reconstructed. The Scientific Notebook System (SNS) is one of the primary mechanisms for data acquisition. Any data that are collected using non-standard procedures will be collected in accordance with the SNS and documented in the scientific notebook. Data for Building 889 will be compiled from a number of different sources. At a minimum, the scientific notebook, electronically collected data records,

Page 32: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page.32 of 87 94-RF-09541

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFER-00049 0

9 of 19 ER / D&D

field instrument data, and sample collection forms should include the following information for each data or sample point:

1. Field sample identification (ID) 2. 3. Sample measurement location 4. Sample measurement description 5. Sample depth (if appropriate) 6. 7. 8.

.. Date and time of sampling/measurement

Parameters or analyses being reported Associated quality control (QC) samples (e.g., duplicates, matrix spikes, etc.) Approximate levels (in counts/minute, ppm etc ...) of contaminates as reported by field instrumentation

4.2 Transmittal of Field Data to Project Data Manager

All data generated in the field will be copied and transferred to the Project Data Manager or designee. This data will include chain-of-custody (COC) forms, field notes, data generated by field instruments (i.e., FIDLER, HPGe, HNu, etc.), and any other data generated in the field. Following shipment of data from the field to the Project Data Manager or designee, the Field Data Coordinator will verbally confirm the data have been received. The field data will be transferred to RFEDS database by the Project Data ManagedProject Manager or designee.

4.3 Data Receipt Confirmation

Upon receipt of the data, the Project Data Manager is responsible for checking, at a minimum that:

1. All data were received and the receipt was noted on the Field Data

2. The data received matches the data acquisition plans. 3. The appropriate field QC checks were performed (calibration of instruments

Transmittal Form.

etc.)

The Project Data Manager will have the responsibility of ensuring that discrepancies identified during the checking process are corrected and documented.

Page 33: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 33 of 87 a 94-RF-09541

_.- . . . _ . E _ . I .

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: WER-00049 Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 - ._ -_- Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 10 of 19 Hazardous Material Sampling Organization: ER / D&D

5 . 0 DATA MANAGEMENT-DATA TRACKING, DATA ENTRY, AND DATA PROOFING

__ . . 5 . 1 Manually Collected Field Data

Data collected manually may consist of field measurements from field sampling kits. Figure 5-1 summarizes the data flow for the manually recorded data from collection through data reporting.

The results and other pertinent information will be recorded on the appropriate data collection forms (Figures 5-2, 5-3, and 5-4), including F014.C “Soil Sample Collection Form.” The results from the forms will be entered into PC data system. The data entry will be QC reviewed by the Project Data Manager prior to entry of the data.

Page 34: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 , .

Page 34 of 87 _r_

94-RF-09541 .'

. . .. ._ .-

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

WER-00049 . . 0 . . - 11 of 19

ER / D&D

MANUAL

_. . _ .

Load Data into - - PC data System Load Data into - - PC data System

Data Available to End Users

Figure 5-1

DATA COLECTIOM SYSTEM FLOWCHART

- - . -

LEGEND

-+ Dataflow

Action and QA Procedures to initiate or maintain dataflow

- - -

- Data Manager confirms completeness I completeness and correctness of data; Scientist performs review of data

Page 35: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 35 of 87 94-RF-09541 - :

--_ _.--_ ,

.. * . . . __ _. . . . . i

WER-00049 . . EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 -- Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling

Page: Organization:

12 of 19 ER/D&D 1

. ..

Figure 5-2 FIDLER MEASUREMENT FORM

1. Monitoring Location: Date:

2. Equipment Information and Background Measurements

Serial Number

3. FIDLER Measurements

Page 36: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

r i ic iosur i I

Page 36 of 8 7 , 94-RF-09541

. .

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

WER-00049 0

13 of 19 ER / D&D

' . .,i . - - - .. A

. . -

. . . .

Figure 5-3 HNu MEASUREMENT FORM

-. .

1. Monitoring Location: Date:

2. Equipment information and Background Measurements

Serial Number

FIDLER Measurements

Page 37: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 37 of 87 94-R F-0954 1

- -

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFER-00049 0

14 of 19 ER / D&D

Figure 5-4 SAMPLE COLLECTION FORM

. . . -. . _. .

Project Number Sample Number Type: SS Contractor Station Code Collection Date Quarter: Disposition:

Purpose: Collection Time Sample Location Composite (Y/N) Composite Desc QC Type Collection Method Sample Team Leader :

Member : Member :

Partner:

Volume Collected Units:

Prepared By

I I Surface Soil Sample Form I Depth of Take Start (in.) End (in.)

Headspace Reading : Comments

L

Sample Crew Member: Print Name

Signature Date

I #

Page 38: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

!

! . . - .. . . .. - _ ..

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

I . .

5 .2 RFEDS Analytical Data

No data will be obtained from the RFEDS database for this sampling plan.

.. - 5 . 3 Data Entry

Data will be entered manually from data collection forms and electronically uploaded to RFEDS.

5.3.1 Manual Data Entry

Manual data entry will be followed by a 100 percent data review by a person different than the person who originally entered the data. Errors will be researched and corrected. A hardcopy of the manually entered data will be initialed and dated by the person performing the review.

5.3.2 Corrections and Changes to Sample Data

Changes or corrections may be required in the data stored in RFEDS. All changes must be accompanied by a Data Correction/Change form (Figure 5-6). The form will detail the changes to be made and document that the changes were completed. Corrections to the database will be proofed by the Project Data Manager or designee for potential entry errors.

Page 39: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

I L, , " *"a - .= I

94-RF-09541 Page 39 of 87

~ -. , . . . < . ... . .

. ... . _ . . w - .. . . .. - RF/ER-00049 .. - . .- ..:-.: - . EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.:

Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

- - 0 . ' . - - . . .. Revision: Page: 16of19 . .

-" ...-.*. " . . -. -.- - ER / D m .- --.+ I- - -..̂ I>,: '.. . - .-..-...-. .--:=

I. . .I ,

. . . .

. . _ - . , . .-. .-.. . .

Figure 5-5

DATA FLOW FOR ANALYTICAL DATA . - - __ -

r

Field Sample Sample Datacap Input Collection -+ Collection Form

Samples to Datacap Electronic Laboratory for Transfer (Data and

Analysis COC)

-

+ Validated Data to

Data Manager RFEDS Results loaded into RFEDS by -b

Electronic Transfer u

Validation PCDatabase . 0 Data Users 0

Page 40: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 40 of 87 94- RF-0954 1

-- - - - . - __

. ~ . . 111. .. . - ' - . :+;-.+.si.

..I' EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: '. WER-00049 . . .

Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 17 of 19 Hazardous Material Sampling Organization: ER / D&D

3

-. ij

-. .*.

. .B

.:. - - 2. --* . . . ,. . . -

3

Figure 5-6

DATA CORRECTION/CHANGE FORM - - . . -. .

The following changes and/or corrections to the database are required (check all that apply):

Data qualifiers have been assigned to the attached sample data

The following sample analyses have been changed:

Other changes or corrections (describe below):

(Date) Changes Requested By-

(Print Name) (Signature)

(Signature) (Date) Changes Made By: (Print Name)

(Date) Changes Checked By:

(Print Name) (Signature)

Page 41: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 41 of 87 94-RF-09541 I

. e.-. s --

._ -

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

FSER-00049 0

18 of 19 ER / D&D

. .. -

. - -

-

5 . 4 Data Verification

Problems encountered in data management are typically due to inconsistencies or errors in the data reporting. Ten percent of the field data in the database will be verified by comparing a printed hard copy from the database to field forms using the procedures in RFP Procedure 5-21 000-OPS-F0.14, Field Data Management, Section 5.6. Typical errors that are found include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Incorrect field sample numbers 2. Duplicate data and samples 3. Improper parameter names 4. Samples with missing data 5. Missing samples 6. Incorrect sample collection data 7. Incorrect units 8. Incorrect qualifiers 9. 10. 11, Incorrect recording of times 12.

Missing detection limits, as applicable Incorrect number of significant figures reported

Inconsistencies in the sequences of data collection

It is important that data inconsistencies and errors be identified as soon as possible to allow for correction prior to data use. To track the number of data points, samples, and analyses requested, it is important that all data (whether they are physical, chemical, or other parameters) be recorded and checked to verify that the data collected meet the project requirements.

5.5 Final QC Review

The following data final QC review procedures are applicable to all data acquisition for .the project. These procedures are designed to ensure the final database is complete and correct. 1. Complete database QC review. A hard copy of the database, organized by

location, will be verified by the Project Data Manager or designee.

2. Clearly mark corrections to the hard copy database report in red ink.

Page 42: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure i

Page 42 of 87 94-RF-09541

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Sampling Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFER-00049 0

19 of 19 ER / D&D

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

0.

9.

Using the data entry sheets and sample collection sheets, check that data identifications are correctly listed on the database hard copy, and the number of data points or number of samples for the removal are reported on the database hardcopy.

Check that all the parameters requested for each analysis are reported on the database hard copy and that units reported on the database hard copy are correct.

- . -

Check that data time sequences are correct.

Check values for all manually collected parameters reported from the database against the field collection forms, at a frequency of approximately 10 percent of the data for each test. If errors are found, an additional 10 percent of results will be checked for similar errors. If errors are found in the second 10 percent, all results will be checked.

Check the corrected copy of the database to determine that corrections have been completed (Le., verify the final hard copy of the database).

The data will then be reviewed by a scientist familiar with the project objectives and data collection activity for data that do not make scientific sense (i.e., a concentration value of 2,000,000 mg/kg).

Following completion of the QC procedure, the Project Manager, in consultation with the Project QNQC Officer and Project Data Manager, will change the database reporting status to "FINAL."

Page 43: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 43 of 87 94-RF-09541

. _ . .- . - _. _- -

DRAFT BUILDING 889 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN

. . APPENDIX B - QUALITY ASSURANCE ADDENDUM

- __ - Rocky Flats Plant

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Rocky Flats Plant Golden, Colorado

September, 1994

Page 44: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 44 of 87 94-RF-09541

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B . Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Manual No . . Revision: Page:

WER-94-00049 0

2 of 24 ER / D&D

. . . . . .

...

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page

. . . . . . TITLE PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 LlSTOF FIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 LISTOFTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.0 PURPOSE 4 2.0 SCOPE 4 3.0 4.0

BASIS FOR TECHNICAL ACTIVITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 BASIS OF QA REQUIREMENTS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

5.0 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

Organization and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Quality Assurance Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

5.2.2 Quality Assurance Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

Design Control and Control of Scientific Investigations . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.3.1 Design Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.3.2 Data Quality Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5.3.3 Equipment Decontamination ............................. 17 5.3.4 Quality Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5.3.5 Quality Assurance Monitoring ........................... 17 5.3.6 Data Reduction, Validation, and Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Control of Purchased Items and Services ...................... 18 Identification and Control of Equipmentlltems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Control of Sampling and Analysis Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

5.1 5.2

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2.1 Training 7

5.3

.......................................... 5.4 Document Control 18 5.5 5.6

19 5.7 5.8 Inspection and Assessment 20- ..................................

Page 45: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

r l lCiOSUr63 i

94-RF-09541 ,

Page 45 of 87 I . .- _ _ - I 1 . i

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

RFER-94-00049 0

ER I D&D 3 of 24 _ -

, _ _ Section Page

I

5.9 5.10 5.1 1 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16

Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Handling, Storage, and Shipping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Status of Inspections, Tests, and Operations . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Control of Nonconformances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 2 1 Corrective Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 2 1 Quality Assurance Records . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . 22 Quality Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Software Control , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

LIST OF TABLES

Table 5-1 Table 5-2

Table 5-3

PARCC PARAMETER SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 FIELD AND ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 LABORATORY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES . . . . . . . 16

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1 TITLE 40 OF THE CODES OF FEDERAL REGULATION . . . . . . 24 PART 264, APPENDIX IX

Page 46: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 , _ T

94-RF-09541

-, - - - - - 3

- 6 EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RFER-94-00049 - f

Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 .. Hazardous Material Organization: ER / D&D .. -y

- - n

---.e _ - Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 4 of 24 _ - * ..I

? c

._ i

1.0 PURPOSE

This Appendix consists of the Quality Assurance Addendum (QAA) for the Building 889 , Sampling and Analysis Plan. The purpose of the QAA is to identify quality assurance

(QA) requirements and specific measures for implementing these requirements, that I

are applicable to the sampling of potential hazardous material locations.

This QAA is intended to supplement the Rocky Flats Plant Site-Wide Quality Assurance Project Plan for CERCLA Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Studies and RCRA Facility /nvestigations/Corrective Measures Studies Activities (referred to as the RFP Site-Wide QAPjP, or simply QAPjP). As a supplement to the QAPjP, this QAA establishes the site-specific measures and QA controls applicable to the actions described in this Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP).

2.0 S C O P E

This QAA addresses all quality-affecting activities described in the SAP to be performed by EG&G Rocky Flats (EG&G); other organizations (subcontractors) shall implement similar QA programs under the auspices of the Department of Energy Rocky Flats Field Office’s direction (DOE, RFFO).

The major actions within this SAP, to which this QAA applies, include:

0 Defining data quality objectives 0 Gathering of field data 0 Sample collection 0 Sample handling and shipping

0 Data Analysis 0 Excavation

Page 47: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

- _ _ A

. . -

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: FSER-94-00049 BuiIding 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0

- _. .- Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 5 of 24 Hazardous Material Organization: ER / D&D

3.0 BASIS FOR TECHNICAL ACTIVITY

The work outlined in the Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan is to identify the - . _ _ specific analytical needs, sampling requirements, data handling requirements and associated QNQC requirements for the completion of the hazardous material sampling. This includes the completion of generating adequate and defensible information to characterize hazardous material contamination in Building 889. The work specifically supports the verification, confirmation, and characterization of hazaedous material contamination in the building.

4.0 BASIS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

The QAPjP was prepared to identify the QA requirements and methods applicable to the RFP Environmental Restoration (ER) Program activities, as identified in the Attachment 2 of the IAG Statement of Work. Section 1V.A of the’IAG specifies the minimum quality elements that the QAPjP must include, and references EPA QAMS/005/80 , lnterim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans, for guidance in preparing the QAPjP.

5.0 QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

The following outlines the quality requirements for the Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan.

Page 48: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 48 of 87. 94-RF-09541 ; - - .

. . . ~ .. . - ..- - L ..ys-. ._^.. .. .. . * _ -1

.. - : . . - . ..

I I EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.:

Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page:

- v u

- - - * RFER-94-00049 0

6 of 24 - - - L - - ER / D&D - .

5.1 Organization and Responsibilities

The EG&G Environmental Restoration Management (ERM), D&D department is responsible for the overall coordination of the Building 889 Sampling and-Analysis. Plan project. Other organizations such as the internal sampling management group and the subcontracted external laboratory will be involved with this work. Responsibilities of other organizations will be assigned by the D&D department.

The organization has been structured such. that quality is the responsibility of those who have been assigned the responsibility of performing the work. Conformance to established requirements shall be verified by individuals and groups not directly responsible for performing the work. The EG&G ERM organization, specifically the D&D department, is responsible for management and coordination of the EG&G resources dedicated to the project.

5.2 Quality Assurance Program

The EG&G ERM Environmental Quality Support (EQS) department is responsible for preparing this QAA and providing internal quality implementation support (including inspections and surveillance of system acceptance and performance) to assure that the quality requirements of this QAA and the QAPjP are being implemented. The QAPjP was written to address QA controls and requirements for implementing . environmental restoration activities, as required by the RFP Interagency Agreement (IAG).

The content of the QAPjP was driven by the DOE Order 5400.1, the RFP QA Manual (RFP QAM), and the IAG. Both, the DOE Order 5400.1 and the RFP QAM, require a QA program to be implemented based on the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) NQA-1, Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facilities. The IAG specifies development of a QAPjP in accordance with the Environmental Protection

I

Page 49: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 49 of 87 I

94-RF-09541

.., . - - . -

. ..-

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material ' Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFER-94-00049 0

7 of 24 ER / D&D ..

Agency (EPA) QAMS-005/80, lnterim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans. The 18-element format of NQA-1 was selected as the basis for both the QAPjP and subsequent QAAs with the applicable elements of QAMS-005/80 incorporated where appropriate. Figure 2-1 of Section 2.0 of the QAPjP illustrates where the 16 QA elements of QAMS-005/80 are integrated into the QAPjP and also into this QAA. Section 2.0 of the QAPjP also identifies other DOE Orders and QA requirement documents to which the QAPjP and this QAA are responsive. The controls and requirements addressed in the QAPjP are applicable to SAP activities, unless specified otherwise in this QAA. Where site-wide actions are applicable to SAP activities, the applicable section of the QAPjP is referenced in this QAA. This QAA addresses additional and site/project specific QA controls and requirements that are applicable to SAP activities to be conducted for building 889 that may not have been addressed on a site-wide basis in the QAPjP. Many of the QA requirements specific to the SAP are addressed in the Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan and are referenced in this QAA.

5.2.1 Training

The minimum personnel qualification and training requirements that are applicable to EG&G and subcontractor staff for RFP ERM Program activities are addressed in Section 2.0 of the QAPjP.

All EG&G and subcontractor personnel that perform quality-affecting activities on this project shall have qualification records that document they are qualified to perform their assigned tasks. The EG&G Project Manager shall identify any Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) area-specific and/or specialized training requirements that are applicable to project personnel.

Page 50: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

. ~ . . - . - .. ~

+ -L

-a ~ - _ - EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: FCFER-94-00049 Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 -

- . Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 8 of 24 Hazardous Material Organization: E R / D & D - * - - ---

Job-specific training for field personnel will include:

e

e

e

e

OSHA 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations training OSHA 24-hour Field Experience OU-1 training RCRA Computer-Based training EG&G Environmental Management Operating Procedures Field Operating Procedures Laboratory Analytical Procedures that are applicable to their assigned tasks Radiation Worker Level II Designated Waste Generator will be RCRA Waste Generator Qualified

, In addition to procedures training, EG&G and subcontractor personnel shall receive training on (1) the requirements of the QAPjP and (2) the Building 889 Hazardous Material Sampling Plan (including this QAA). This training must be recorded, with verifiable documentation of training submitted to the EG&G Project Manager prior to

I implementing the sampling and analysis activities described in the SAP.

I EG&G and subcontractor personnel shall also be qualified to perform the tasks they I

have been assigned. Personnel qualifications must be documented, with documentation of qualifications verified by the EG&G Project Manager in accordance with ERM Administrative Procedure 3-2 1 000-AD M-02.02, Personnel Qualifications.

5.2.2 Quality Assurance Reports

A QA summary report will be prepared at the conclusion of the Project activities by the EG&G QA Program Manager. This report will include a summary of field operation and sampling oversight inspections, laboratory assessments, surveillances, and a report on data verificationhalidation results.

Page 51: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

I

Enciosure 1

Page 51 .of 87 94-RF-09541

--

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

.. WER-94-00049

0 9 of 24

ER f D&D

. . -

5.3 Design Control and Control of Scientific Investigations

5.3.1 Des ign Control

The Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan describes the general design considerations for implementing work activities, outlining sampling and analysis techniques, describing analytical requirements, and summarizing data management processes. As such, this SAP is considered the environmental investigation control plan for the building 889 sampling.

The QAPjP considers activities that generate analytical data, which requires collection and analysis of environmental samples, to be.scientific investigations. Controls for scientific investigations include:

0 Developing data quality objectives; 0 Collecting and analyzing samples according to approved procedures;

Establishing and implementing quality controls; and Reducing and reporting data in a controlled manner.

0

0

~ 5.3 .2 Data Quality Objectives

Data quality objectives (DQOs) quantitatively and qualitatively describe the uncertainty that decision makers are willing to accept in results derived from environmental data.

Because this is a characterization sampling investigation and does not pertain to regulatory closure criteria, DQOs are not required for this sampling plan.

I

~ Accuracy can be defined as the agreement of the measured value with the true value of a parameter. For analytical and radiochemistry purposes, accuracy is indicated by the comparison of laboratory control samples to their true values. -

Page 52: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 52 of 87 94-RF-09541

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page: .

RF/ER-94-00049 0

10 of 24 ER / D&D

Representativeness is based on sampling locations and matrices specified in the SAP. The SAP will ensure that samples represent the thre'e-dimensional __ volume . . of interest.

Comparability is established by use of DOE and EPA approved standard operating procedures (SOPs) and analyticalhadiochemistry laboratory methods. Field and administrative SOPs are listed Table 5-2. Laboratory methods are listed in Table 5-3 and a specific listing of all methods and analytes is attached (See Attachment 1, Title 40 of the Codes of Federal Regulation Part 264, Appendix IX). Detection limits for all methods are also given in the GRRASP (EG&G, 1992). When deviations from the standard operating procedures (SOPs) occur, or when new or nonstandard procedures are implemented, a Scientific Notebook System (SNS) will be used as the primary means of documenting quality-affecting information (analytical method changes are requested from the program chemists and documented in the case narratives).

Page 53: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

L,.b.yJLIc-

94-RF-09541 Page 53 of 87

~. -. *:.

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFIER-94-00049 . 0

11 of24 ER / D&D

Completeness is defined as usable data from 2 90% of all planned field samples. This will include 2 50% of the usable data as validated with respect to analytical and radiochemical laboratory analyses.

Table 5-2

FIELD AND ADMINISTRATIVE STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

EG&G IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROC EDURE TITLE:

0

5-21 000-OPS-FO.3 5-21 000-OPS-F0.3 5-2 1 000-OPS-F0.6 5-21 000-OPS-F0.7 5-21 000-OPS-FO.10

5-21 000-OPS-FO. 1 1 5-21 000-OPS-F0.12 5-21 000-OPS-F0.13

5-21 000-OPS-FO. 18

2-G06-ER-ADM-05.10 2-G32-ER-ADM-08.02 5-21 000-OPS-FO. 16 4-Bl1 -ER-OPS-F0.25

General Equipment Decontamination General Equipment Decontamination Handling of Personal Protective Equipment Handling of Decontaminated Water and Waste Water Receiving, Labeling, and Handling Environmental Materials Containers Field Communications Decontamination Facility Operations Containerization, Preserving, Handling, and . Shipping of Soil and Water Samples Environmental Sample Radioactivity Content Screening Use of Controlled Scientific Notebooks. Evaluation of ERM Data for Usability in Final Reports Field Radiological Measurements Shipping Limited Quantities of Radioactive Materials in Samples

- - I

54/76

Page 54: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

MER-94-00049 0

12 of 24 ER / D&D

EG&G IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: PROCEDURE TITLE:

_.

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5-21 000-OPS-F0.14 3-21 000-ADM-5.01 3-21 000-ADM-15.01 I -50000-ADM-12.01 1 -50000- 1 6.1 6 5-21 000-OPS-FO.02 3-21 000-ADM-17.01 3-21 000-ADM-18.03

. .

Field Data Management Document Control Control of Nonconforming Items and Activities Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Corrective Action Program Field Document Control Records Management Readiness Reviews

Table 5-3

LABORATORY STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

ANALYTICAL SUITE: CONTROLLING DOCUMENTS:

O v o c s

Metals svocs

Title 40 of the Codes of Federal Regulation Part 264, Appendix IX. All laboratory analyses will also . adhere to protocols specified in Parts A and B of the EG&G General Radiochemistry and Routine Analytical Services Protocol (GRRASP).

Radionuclides Part B of the GRRASP.

Page 55: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 55'of 87 :

I

94-RF-09541 i 1 - . - --,,. -

' . i .- . . i

i .-. ._,

I _. I, - - 1 t i

- 1

. I

- 2; EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: WER-94-00049

- I Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 13 of 24 ** Hazardous Material Organization: ER / D&D 77.

2

I

5.3.3 Equipment Decontamination

Sampling equipment that is used at more than one location shall be decontaminated between sampling locations in accordance with Field Operations (FO) Procedure OPS-FO.03, General Equipment Decontamination.

5.3.4 Quality Control

Field sampling quality control will consist of:

0 Collection of field duplicate samples will be at a minimum of 1 per 20

Preparation and analysis of an equipment rinsate blank for ever 20 soil samples;

samples collected (at a minimum or at least one rinsate blank if 20 soil samples are not collected); and

0

0 Trip blanks for VOC analysis

Notwithstanding the QA sample schedule just presented, the number of field duplicates and replicates that will be collected will be limited to one each per day. Analytical laboratory QC for sample analyses shall be as specified in the GRRASP.

5.3.5 Qual ity Assurance Mo n it oping

To assure the overall quality of the sampling and analysis activities associated with the SAP for the Building 889 Hazardous Material Sampling project, field oversite inspections will be conducted during sampling and analysis activities. Field oversite inspections to be conducted by the ERM Environmental Quality Support department will include:

l 0 Field inspections;

Page 56: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 56 of 87 94-RF-09541

. _ I , > .

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page:

-~ ._

..- - ---_.. RFER-94-00049

0 - - 14 of 24

ER / D&D

e Various intervals of audits and surveillances; and A minimum of one surveillance per each field activity. 0

- . 5.3.6 Data Reduction, Validation, and Reporting

Data evaluation and reporting requirements for field and laboratory data are discussed in Appendix A, the Data Management Plan for the Building 889 Hazardous Material Sampling Plan.

5 .4 Document Control

Documents produced by EG&G that control the work described in this SAP shall be "'controlled" to ensure that key project personnel receive accurate and up-to-date information. Such documents shall be controlled in accordance with Section 6.0 of the QAPjP and with ERM Procedure 3-21 000-ADM-5.01, Document Control.

.

5 .5 Control of Purchased Items and Services

Procurement documents for items and services procured under this project, including services for conducting field sampling and analysis, shall be prepare, handled, and controlled in accordance with the requirements and methods specified in Section 4.0 of the QAPjP and in ERM Procedure ADM-4.01 , Procurement Document Control, including retention of purchase order receipts, contracts, or any other documentation related to the integritykraceability of the purchased product or service.

Subcontractors that provide services in support of the SAP activities will be selected and evaluated as outlined in Section 7.0 of the QAPjP. This includes pre-award evaluation/audit of proposed subcontractors as well as periodic assessment of the acceptability of contractor performance during the project, Any items or materials that are purchased for use during the sampling, analysis, and other SAP activities that ~

Page 57: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

I Enclosure 1 94-RF-09541 Page 57 of 87 :

=z . 1 _- . - I I

--.. 2 . . - I-

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RFER-94-00049 - - Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0

Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Page: 15 of 24 ER / D&D

~

have the ability to affect the quality of the data should be inspected upon receipt. ,

- 5 .6 Identification and Control of EquiprnentAtems

Soil samples shall be identified, handled, containerized, shipped, and stored in accordance with EM Operating Procedure 5-21 000-OPS-FO. 13, Containerization, Preserving, Handling, and Shipping of Soil and Water Samples. Sampling identification and chain-of custody (COC) will be maintained through the application of Section 8.0 of the QAPjP and of Procedure 5-21 000-OPS-F0.13 which provides instructions for preparing COC forms.

A sample chain-of-custody (COC) will be initiqted at the time the samples are collected and maintained through all transfers of custody until the sample is received at the testing laboratory. laboratory and sample tracking throughout the analytical process shall be maintained in accordance with laboratory procedures.

Samples shall be logged in upon receipt at the analytical

5 . 7 Control of Sampling and Analysis Processes

The overall process of collecting and analyzing samples require control. The processes are controlled by adhering to the SAP and the sampling and analytical procedures referenced., The requirements for:

Sample Collection will be addressed in Section 3.0 of the SAP; Sample Analyses will be addressed in Section 4.0 of the SAP; and Data Input will be addressed in Appendix A, Data Management Plan, of the SAP.

Page 58: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1 .

Page 58 . of . - : I 871

i

- 1 ' I

94-RF-09541. i

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material

Manual No.: Revision: Page: Organization:

WER-94-00049 0

16 of 24 ER / D&D

5 .8 Inspection and Assessment

Quality-affecting activities are subject to inspection and assessments. These assessments will be performed formally in accordance with EG&G procedures (e.g., Procedures 3-21000-ADM-10.01 and/or -ADM-18.02), or informally as requested by line management. The work place and working records shall be accessible during normal working hours for verification or audit by EG&G or their representatives during the performance of this project.

Any nonconformances identified during formal assessments shall be documented with Nonconformance Reports in accordance with Section 15 of the QAPjP and EM Administrative Procedure 3-21 000-ADM-15.01, Control of Nonconforming Items and Activities. Independent audits of the project may be conducted by the ERM EQS organization in accordance with QA procedures.

5 .9 Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment

Measuring and test equipment (M&TE) used in the screening of samples shall be selected, identified, calibrated, and maintained in accordance with the methods established in RFP Administrative Procedure 1 -50000-ADM-12.01 , Control of Measuring and Test Equipment. The M&TE requirements of Section 12 of the QAPjP are implemented through operating procedures specific to the sampling/analysis event, manufacturers instructions, and specific laboratory procedures. In addition, field equipment utilized during SAP activities will be the field instrument for the detection of low energy radiation (FIDLER), the high purity germination detector (HPGe), and the HNu instrument. Field equipment documentation will be made on forms identified in Appendix A, Data Management Plan, of the SAP. Laboratory equipment usage shall be conducted in accordance to the GRRASP requirements.

Page 59: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 59 of 87 : 94-RF-09% 1

. I . . - .

. . .. .. ._

.-. . . I . - I EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.:

Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFER-94-00049 0

17 of 24 ER / D&D

5.10 Handling, Storage, and Skipping

Samples shall be packaged, transported, and stored in accordance with RFP Procedure 5-21 000-OPS-F0.13, Containerization, Preserving, Handling, and Shipping of Soil and Water Samples.

5.1 1 Status of Inspections, Tests, and Operations

The status of the sampling and analysis inspections, startup SAP activities, and sustained operations shall be documented according to the requirements of Section 14.0 of the QAPjP.

5.1 2 Control of Nonconformances

The requirements for the identification, control, evaluation, and disposition of nonconforming items, samples, and data will be implemented as specified in Section 15.0 of the QAPjP. Items, samples, and data that do not conform to specifications and/or requirements shall be identified, segregated (where necessary to prevent inadvertent use), dispositioned, and evaluated in accordance with approved procedures. Nonconformances related to the design, construction, installation, or testing of the testing system, and any waste related nonconformance, shall be controlled in accordance with ERWl Procedure 1-50000-ADM-15.01, Control of . Nonconforming Items, Samples, and Data. I

I - 5.1 3 Corrective Action

The identification, reporting, closeout, and documentation of significant conditions adverse to quality shall be accomplished in accordance with Section 16.0 of the QAPjP and with ERM Procedure 1-50000-1 6.1 6, Corrective Action Program. Conditions adverse to quality identified by the implementing contractor shall be -

Page 60: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

ciiciosure 1

Page 60 of 87 . 94-RF-09541 ,

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page:

- _? --- RFER-94-00049 ' .

0 18 of 24

ERIDBtD - .

documented and submitted to EG&G for processing as outlined in the QAPjP.

- - . _ . __ . 5 .1 4 Quality Assurance Records - . - . - ..

Field QA records will be controlled in accordance with RFP Procedure 5-21000- OPS-F0.02, Field Document Control. Project records that are considered ERM QA records include, but are not necessarily limited to:

The final report, (including all appendices); Design documents; Procurement documents; Construction/installation records; Supplier/subcontractor evaluations; Inspection records; Test records; Logbooks; Sampling records; Sample chain-of-custody records; Analytical data packages; Interim and annual operating reports; Action plans; Operation manuals; N onco m pl i ance Re po rts (N C Rs) ; Corrective Action Reports (CARS); Audit reports; Surveil lance reports; Self-assessment reports; Personnel training and qualification records; The QAPJP;

Page 61: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 61 of 87 94-RF-09541

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Hazardous Material Organization:

Revision: Page:

RFER-94-oOO49 0

19 of 24 ER / D&D

Any administrative and operating procedures referenced herein; and Any other project records that are used to support observations and conclusions in the final report.

All ERM QA records generated shall be submitted to the ERM Project File for processing according to ERM Procedure 3-21 000-ADM-17.01, Records Management.

5.1 5 Quality Verification

QA surveillances and audits will be periodically conducted by the EG&G EQS department throughout the duration of project to verify the quality of project data. Readiness reviews will be conducted according to ERM Procedure 3-21 000-ADM, 18.03, Readiness Reviews.

5.1 6 Software Control

The requirements for the control of software are not applicable to the SAP activities to be performed for the building 889 sampling plan.

Page 62: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

tnciosure i

Page 62 of 87-1 - 94-RF-09541

._ - _ - 4

-.- - - - * I

EG&G ROCKY FLATS Manual No.: RFER-94-00039 -

Building 889 Sampling and Analysis Plan Revision: 0 Appendix B - Quality Assurance Addendum Page: 20 of 24 Hazardous Material Organization: ER / D&D

. . .. . . . ..

ATTACHMENT 1

TITLE 40 OF THE CODES OF FEDERAL REGULATION PART 264

APPENDIX IX

Page 63: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

ing

idizers

GROUP 6-B

other organic acids iineral acids .es

le and combustible wastes isequences: Fire, explosion. or n. 7, Regulations. and Guidelines : Hazardous Waste." California Health, February 1975. n. 12. 19811

BS

ALASKA

S Kodiak Lynn Canal-Icy

palmer-Wasilla-

Seward Si tka Wade Hampton

St ra i t s '

Talkeena

et Wrangell Petemburg Ice of Yukon-Kuskokwim

ARIZONA

Greenlee Y uma

CALIFORNIA

COLORADO

Mineral Rio Grande Saguache

ude counties. city-county Con- .nd independent cities. In b. the political jurisdictfons icts. and. in the case of jurisdiction llsted is the iSl.ad

Environmental Protection Agency

HAWAII Hawaii

IDAHO

Bannock Franklin Bear Lake Fremont Bingharn. Jefferson Bonneville Madison caribou Cassia Clark

Beaverhead Broadwater Cascade Deer Lodge Flathead Gallatin Granite Jefferson Lake Lewis and Clark Madison

Oneida Power Teton

MONTANA

Meagher Mlssoula P a r k . Powell Sanders Silver Bow Stillwater Sweet Grass Teton Wheatland

NEVADA All

NEW MEXICO

Bernalillo Sante Fe ' Catron Sierra

Beaver Box Elder Cache Carbon Davis Duchesne Emery Garfield Iron Juab Millard Morgan

Chelan Clallam Clark Cowlitz Douglas F e w Grant Grays Harbor Jefferson King Kitsap Kitt l tas Lewis

Fremont Lincoln Park Sublette

Pt. 264, App. IX

UTAH Piute

Summlt Tooele Utah Wasatch

WASHINGTON

Mason Okanogan Paciflc Pierce San Juan Islands

Skamania Snohomish Thurston Wahkiakum Whatcom Yakirna

WYOMING

Teton U i n t a

[46 FR 57285. Nov. 23. 1981; 47 FR 953. Jan. 8.

APPENDICES VII-VI11 TO PART % Torrance Valencia

Los Alamos Rio Arriba Sandoval [RESERVED]

APPENDIX M TO PART 264-GROUND-WATER MONITORING LIST 1

Common name?

ACenaphthene ............................ Amaphlhylene .........................

Acetone ...................................... Acetophenone ............................ Acetonilrile; Melhyl cyanide ....... 2-Acetyfaminofluorene; 2-AAF ... Acrolein ...................................... krylqldr ik ................................ Mrin ..........................................

NlYr * W e ............................... 4dminobiphenyl ........................

94-RF-09541 Page 63 of 87

GROUNDWATER MONITORING LIST 1 .'

I CAS RN J I Chemical abslracts service index name 4

I

8%32-9 Acenaphthyhe. 13dihydre .................................... ZJ8-964 ......................................................... I Acenaphthylene

6744-1 2 P r w o n e ............

107-02-8 Z-Prcpenal ....................... ........................ 107-1S-1 2Ropenenitrile ......................................................... I

325

- SUP

%%Y ods 5 -

81W E2 70 8100 8270 8240 8270 801 5 8270 8030 8240 8030 8240 8080 8270

801 0 8240 8270

Page 64: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Pt. 264, App. IX 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-93 Edition)

GROUNDWATER MONITORING LIST 1-Continued

Common name2

Aniline ........................................ Anthracene ................................. Antimony ....................................

A m i t e .......I

mi .......................................

Barium ........................................ Benzene .........

Benzo[a]anlhracene; B e n Z a n t h G X 0 f W .

Benzo[b]ftucwanlhene ................. Benzopc]fluoranlhene ................. Benzo[ghiJperylene .................... Benzo(alpyrene .......................... Beolyl akX4lOl ............................ Beryllium ....................................

alph*BHc .................................

bethsHc ...................................

&Ha-BHC ..................................

gammaBHC; Lindane ..............

Bis(2<hbrcelhoxy)methane ..... Bis(2-chloroethyl)elher ..............

ether: 2 2 - D i c h b r d i i i r o p y l ether.

Bis(24hylhexyl) phthalale .......

Bis(2shlm+l -methylethyl)

&omdichlaome(hane ............. Branofom: Tr ikmmethane .. 4-&anophenyl phenyl ether ..... Buy benzyl phmahte: Benq

butyl phlhakle Cadmium ..................................

Cabon dbulMe ...................... . Catan tebachlaide ................. Chlcrdane ............................. pChlaoaniline .. ....................... Chlctobeozene .......................

ChlaobeozWe ...................... pChlcfo-m-a& ....................

;AS RNS

62-53-3 120-12-7

V O W

140-57-8

f l o w

V O W

7 1 4 2

5 6 - 5 4

20599-2

207-08-9

191-24-2

50-324

. l a 5 1 4 (Told

319-844

319-85;

3 1 9 4 6 4

5fI-894

111-91- 11144- 100-60-

117-81-

7527-

75-25

101-55 &+68-

fl-

7515- s 2 3 -

57-74-

10647- 108-90-

510-16

59-50-

enzenamme . nthracene

ntimooy

larium ....................................................................... benzene

."

lenz[e]acephenanmqiene

lenzopc]flu~anthene

lenzo[ghilperylene ..._...... . ........... lenzo(a]pyrene ............................... lenzenemethard ...................................................... 3erylliurn ............................... ~

>&hexane. 12.3.4.5.&hexhkx-.(la, 20.38. 4 a S P . W

5a.W

48.5468k

4a.k.Wk

)yclohexane. 1 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . ~ e x h l a 0 - . ( 1 a 2 ~ . 3448 .

3ycbhexane. 1 2 . 3 . 4 . 5 . & h e x ~ b ~ . ( l a ~ a . 30.

Cyclohexane. 12.3.4.5.6-hexachb.(la. 2a. 38,

Elhane. 1.1 '-[methylenebis ( q ) ] t i r [2-chb0- ........ Elhane. 1 . l '+-p-Chb ...................................... m a n e . 2 2 ' o r y b i s [ l z h b ..................................

1 2 B e n z e n e d i i x y l i c acid. bis(2-e~ylheayl)ester

Melhane. br.ancdichw

W a n e . tribrcfre ._ ................................................ Benzene. l - b y o 4 p m x y - ..

Cadmium ................................ .. 1 f-Benzened~caho xylr acid. buiyi phenylmemy

esler.

carbon d i m ____.._.._..... " ......................... h4emane. l e b a c h b .._.._..-_--._ ̂._

4 , 7 M e ( h ~ l H h d m a 12.4.5.6.7B.8-xtachkm

Benzenamine. 4chbPJ- ....................................... Benzene. c h b __. .................................

2.3.3a4.7.7a hcu-ahyje.

Benzeneaoetic @. achlaw-(achbmmYl)-a

mend. &chb&hnemy+ ..._..........._.... . ...-.. hydroxy. e(hyl ester.

326

8270 81 00 8270 6010 7040 7061 8270

6010 7060 7061 6010 7080 8020 8240 8100 8270 8100 8270 81 00 8270 81 00 8270 81 00 8270 8270 6010 7090

8080

8250 808c

825€ 808c

82% 808(

82x @27( 827( 801( 827(

80€4 827( 801( 824 801( 824 8271 806( 8271 601 I 713 713 824 8011 824 8081 825 8271 801 802 824 827

804

7091

10 200

10 3M)

2.000 30 10

500 10 20 20

1.000 2 5

200 10

200 10

200 10

200 10

200 10 20

3 50 2 0.05

10 0.05

40 0.1

30 0.05

10 10 10

100 10

20 10 1 5 2 5

10 5

10 40 50

1 5 1 5 0.1

10 20

2 2 5

10

5

Environmental Protection A g w

GFIOUNDWAI

Common name?

c%e-cemane; Ethyl chlaide

alkTolam

mroronaphthm .._...__.._..

CChlacphenyl phenyl ether -.... Chlacpene ............................... Chrmiun

Chrysene

coban .........................................

COFper ...................... "

mCI& .................. M2esc4 ..................................... .pcresd .................................... Cyanlde ........................... ~ ........ 240; 2.4

4.C-DDE ...................... I

. 4.C-DDT .................................... Diallate ...................................... hzla.h]anlhracene ..............

12-Dibm&hlorc~rqxne:

12aibmceihane: Ethylem

% phthalale ........._..__. m b c t w z e n e

DBCP.

abrmide.

. .

. 'm lorobeozene ..._.__._..-

brobenzene ....___._.___

. I : . , . . . _.._ ..A"-

75.00-3

67-664

9166-7

9567-0

7005-724 126-994

C T d )

21861-9

10839-4 95-46-7

1- 57-12-5 94-75-7

72-54-8

72-

50-El4

=1&4

S 7 M

132- 12-1

-124

1-

64-74: - 5414%

1-

91-94- 110474 7 5 7 1 1

7-

107-

7-

Page 65: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

iironmental Protection Agency Pt. 264 App. IX

GROUNDWATER MONITORING LIST I-Continued I

hrysene ................................... .. ...._...__.....__.. ......................

* _. ........_.._...__ ..._................ , .

& r e d .................................. <rea .................................... $ red ...................................... Cyanide ..................................... 2.4-0: 2.4-

DihlorophenoryacelK =id. 4.Q'aDD .............................. ...... 4.Q'aDE .............................. ...... 4,Q'ODT ............................... ....... &&le ......................................... hbenz(a.h]anlhracefle ............... Dthzofuran ...__..__..._........... ...... Obtmochlotomelhane:

12-0ibran&-ChlorCWWf"% ChlorodlbrOmOmethae

DBCP.

12-O1bmoelhane; Ethylene

&fl-bulyi phthalate ..._..__............ bOkhlac&nzene .....................

dibranide.

811 82' 6010 7200 7201 6010 7210 8270 6270 8270 9010 8150

8080 8270 8080 8270 8080 8270 8270

8100 8270

8010 8240 8010 8240 8270 8010 E240 8060 8270 Bo10 8(w 8120

8270

20 5

10 0.5 5

10 10 5

10 10 50

5 70 .

500 10

200 10 70 500

10 €0

200 10 10 10 40 10

0.1 10 0.05

10 0.1

10 10

200 10 10

1 5

1M) 5

10 10 5 5

10 2 5

10 10 5 5

10 10 2 5

15 10 20

5 10 5 1 5 0.5 5 1 5

327

Page 66: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

PI. 264, App. IX 40 CFR Ch. I (7- 1-93 Edition)

GROUNDWATER MONITORING LIST 14ontinued

Environmental Protection Agency

GROUND-WATER

C o m m name?

wars-1 2-Dichloroelhylene ......... 2.4-Dichlaophend ..................... 2.WChlorophend ..................... 12-Dichlaopro9ane .................. Cir1.3.DichlorCpopene ............. bans- t3hchkrqxopene ......... O&nn .......................................

DPmyI phltaale ........................ 0.0-0iethyi 0-2pyrazinyl

phosphaolhioate; Thionazin

p(Dimethylamirn)azctenzene .. 7.1 2-OimeUlylbenz[a~lhracene 3.3-Dimethyl~zi3ine ............... alpha aJPh2-

2.4-Dimethyiph3n~4

Oimethyl phmaIale ....................

Dimethylphenethyhmine.

.......

....... 2.4-Oinihophend ....................... 2.4-Oinitraduene ...................... 2.6Oinitraduene ........... D i m ; DNW, 2-seCButyl

4,Wnibopheod l h - a l y i phmel8le ................... 1 .*me ............................... Diphenylamine .......................... Dbdfolm .................................. Endo%IIan I

Endosunan II

Endosunan Sunale ..._.............. Endrin _ .._.............. ~ .................

Endin aMehyde ......................

Ethylbenzene .. .- ....-........_.-... Emyl memaclytate ..- ...............

Ethyl m e t h a n e e ........... Famphut .... .............................

;AS RN3

1-

120-8%2

87-65-0 7-74

0061-01-5

0061+-6

60-57-1

-2

297-47-2

63-51-5

. 63-11-7 57-976

119-93-7 122-04-8

1-74

131-114

99-654 53652-1

51-284

121-lb:

m 6 - S

117-844

123-91- 122-39- 29806.

959-984

u213-654

1031-07-1

72-20-1

7421-95-

1 o w 1 -

97-63

E 2 4 & 52-85-

~ ~~ ~

Chemical abstracts service indea name'

Elhene. lpdichbrc-. (E)- . ......................................... Phend. 2.4diichloro ................................ Phmd. 2.€-diKhlorW ...... Propane, 1 2 - W ................... ......

1

.....................

(-Propene. 1 . W i b r ~ . (2)- .................................... 1-Propene. 1.5dilorc-. (E)- .................................... 2,7:3,6Dirnemanonafhth 123bloxirene. 3.4.5.6.9.8

hexachkrw 1 a22a3.6.6a7.7a- Oclahydrc-.

12-80tlZWledicarboXflK a d . dievlyl &e( ........ ..-.. (1 a a 2 5 . 2 ~ ~ 38.68.6as75.7aa~

Pha$+homthioic acid. 0,CMieIhyl Opyrarioyl rater

'hosphuc~ithii acid. 0.cMimemyl a2-

lenzenamine. N.WimeIhyl-4-(phenyIazo)- lenzlalanmracene. 7.12-dime+hyl- ............................ 1 .l'-&phenylp.4'diamhe. ....-. I .... lenrmeelhanamine. sadi ................ 'henol. 2.4dimeIhyC ................................................ 2 B e n z e r l d i n l ( i c acid. dimaulyl es1W ...........

(rnethylamino~2aWthfi e5Ier.

3enzene. 1 .Minitre %enol. 2-methyCd.6dnilm

%enol. 2.4din- .................................................. ... 3enzene. 1-mechyl-2.4-dinilm ..........

I 3enzene. 2mechyl-1 .%dinitre .................................. Phend. 2-(1mechylpC+y4)4.6d*litro .........-......-... 12-&lZeoeoicarbo~K acid. e5IW ._-....-.. 1.4-Doxane .. Benzenamine. KpheoyC .......................................... phosph~~di(h~ic acid. o.cwemyl S-P

6.Weulano-2.4.Me1uodbxathiin. 6.7.8.9.10.10. herachl0r~~l.5.5a6.9.9ahexahydr0, -xibe,

6,-2.43benrodioxaUIiin, 6.7.8.9.10.10

(dh~lOkthfie5@i

(k.W.€a%Wk.

(%.-a 68%. *k hexachlac- 1.5.5a.6.9.9bhexah~. 30-

6.Weulw2.4.- ' thiepin. 6.7.8.9.10.10 h@xadOm 1 5 . 5 4 6 . 9 . S 3 - h 8 ~ . 3-

2.73.6oimemancnephm[2.2-bb~. 3.45.699 hexad.* 1&2A3,6.&7,7a- octahydrp.

1 2 . 4 - 5 (raa. 282aB 3cc6a sae;la 7 m k

P. 224.33.4.7 h-. (1a2LX a 4 6

Benzene. echyc ---.....--- 2Ropenoic acid. n-mem*. emyl ester .-I_

Iraa*-mk

328

8010 8240 8040 8270 8270 8010 8240 Bo10 8240 8010 8240 8080 8270

8060 &?70 8270

8270

8270 8270 6270 8270

BOQ(1

8060 627c 827c 8040 827c Bo4E 827c w 827( w 827c 8154 8271 806( 827( 801! 827( 814 8271 8oB( 82s

Boa

8270

w 8271 808 625l

em 8271

Sm sw 801 824 e 7 027 827

.___

m ( W u O -

1 5 5

10 10 OS 5 20

5 5 5 0.05

10

5 10 10

10

10 10 10 10

5 10 5

10 10

150 50

150 50 02

10 0.1

10 1

10 30 10

1 9 10 2

10

10 ai

0.05

as 10

10 ai

02 10

2 5

10 5

10 10 10

3

7 Common name2

1 m l h e n e ............................. w e n e ..................................... Heptachlor .............................. ,.- -)or qxxide ....................

HeX&wobenzene ................... Hexalcfobutadiene ................. &x;rhlorocyclopenladiene ....... -woethane ...................... &xixhlwophene ....................... HelachloropropAne .................... 2Hexanone ............................... 1ndeno(l2.3-cd)pyrene .............. -1 alcohol ................... - ..... lyJjcin ...... ...-. .............

KepOne ........................ Lead ............................... 1

,+

. Mercwy .............. Memacrylonitrile . Mempyrilene ........................... Mechoxychlcf ................... I ........ M y 1 bromide: Bromomechane

Memy1 chloride; Ch lmelhane

e 7 3 7

76-44-8

1024-57-3

118-74-1

87-

n-474

67-72-1

7030-4 1888-71-7 591-786 193-39-5

-1 -734

2-

i : L

I.

91-W-5

72-45-5 :

7-

74-87-3

5w4d 7-

7549-2

7 E 4 u 3

'

€6-27-3 i 91-67-6 '

29goD-o:

108-10-1

91-2(M

130-154 1-7 9-

CTW! ,

Page 67: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

1)

-

-

5

M

t

) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 I 1.1 I 1 0 3 0 I 3 2 0 0.1 0

0.05

0.5 0 0.1 0

02 0

2 5 0 5 0. 0 0

Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 264, App. IX

GROUNDWATER MQNITORING LIST 14ontinued

Common name 2

Fluarmlhene ........ ...................... Fluorene ..................................... Heptachbr ................................... Heptachlor epozide _..._.,.,.,_........

Hsrachlorobenzene ...___._.__....... Hexachlorobutadiene ....__...........

Hexachlorocyclopenliene .......

HexachlorOelhane ......................

Hexachlorophene ...... .. .... ........... Herachlaropropene ................... 2.Mexanone .............................. indeno(i 2 .w)pyrene .............

ISoSatrOle _....._..... K-e

Lead ..........................................

hthapyrilene .......... . ..... ..........

Methyl bromide; Bromomethanl

Methyl Chlwde: Chlaomelhmf

jMeihytholanmrene .._.._ ........ Methylene bromd

Methylene chm

Ikmyl ethyl ketone: MEK ....... M y 1 icuide; idomethane ... Myi memaayiate ...._........... Whg methanasu~atc 2-Memyinaph~ta1ane ...._...._... Methyr parathion: Parathii

~y1-2-pentanone;

Naphmene .......................... 1.bhlaphmoquinone ._..._...._... 1Hapmhytamine ........_........... 2-Naphth ... Ni&e( ._ ._. "+'i*miline

Oibmomethane.

~ihbmmelhane.

memyl.

boburyc ketone.

CAS R N 3

206-4w

6.573-7

76-44-8

1026573

118-74-1

87-684

n - 4 7 4

67-72-1

70-304 1-71-7 591-7M 193-394

7* 465-73-

78-59-

120-58- 143-50-

VOQ

F O Q 126-98-

9140-

7243-

7-

74-87-

-4 74-95

7 5 0 3

78-93

74-88

80-62.

-27. 91-67

298-0

108-10

Chemical abstracts service index m e *

91-20-3

130-15-4 13632-1 91-594

(Totas

86-7w

n-mene ............................................................... 9H-Fluorme ................................................................. 4.7MethWlHindene. 1.4.5.6.7.8.8heptachlw

3a.4.7.7b(m)dr* ~ m a n e 2 H i n d e n ~ 1 2 + ] o x i r e n e . 2.3.4.5.6.7.7- heptachloro-1 a. 1 b.5.5a.6.6a.herahydre. ( ra4lbp2aSa.~.68.Eda) mzene. hexzhbn3 ................................................ 58utadiene. 1.1.2.3.4.4-hexa~hbr+ __..__..__..___...... ?-Ccyc)opentadiene, 12.3.4.5.5-hexach!a+ _._......_. hane. h e x a c h w ...._..___._........ . . . . ...... . .

ebis[3.4.6uichlor* ................. 3-hexachlor* ....._. .............. .....

Hexanone ............................................................ ,... , ~ 1 2 , k d ] p y r e n e ................................

w. ss. WWk. C,ckhe*en-lone. 3.5.5-trimelhyl-

.38enzodioxde. 5-(t-prOpenyl> ._......__.... ............. cyclobutb [ai)pentaIeo-2ae k5b.b ckCaChbrCcCWVdr* .___ ..._.._. .._. . ... . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . ............. ..

hefaJry ................................................... .............. t. -i+openenrtnle, 2methyl- ..__._...__.....__..... .............. 2,Emmedlamme. N.KdrmefhyCN'-2- pyndvl. N g - m i i ymem y~b.

hzene. 1.1~-(222.tnchlor~Wdene)bsP -*. mane. Lycfn* ..................................................... &mane. aim ......................................... %y,z(j]aceanlhrylene. 12dihydrO-k1WIhyC ......._... w a n e . dibnmw

!sutancne ..__" ....................................................

Zprcpeoac ' a. 2methyc. methyl ester ._._........ Mechananm~iC acid. memyr ester __._..........._.. NapMhpene: 2""mvc _.___._._-__-...--.... Phosphaoana add. o.Gcmew w, 2PentlnUla. cmemyc _____- ~ -....... - .-.-.. nibophemll) aster.

- sos-

gested meth- ods'

8100 8270 8100 8270 8080 8270 8080 8270

8120 8270 8120 8270 8120 8270 8120 8270 8270 8270 8240 81W 827c 801: 827C

804: 827t 827( 8271

6011 74% 742 7471 801! 824 8271

Bo@ 8271 801' 824 80 1 824 827 801 824 801 824 801 824 801 824 801 e24 e27 e 2 7 814 e21 Sol

81( 827 82; 621 82; 60' 75: 82;

200 10

200 10 0.05

to 1

10

0.5 10 5

10 5

10 0.5

10 10 10 50

200 10 50 10

60 10 10 10

40 1 .Ooo

10 2 5 5

10

2 10 20 10 1

10 10 15

5 5 5

10 100 40 5 2 5

10 10 0.5

10 5

50 Mo 10 10 10 10 50 40

50

Page 68: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Pt. 264, App. IX 40 CFR Ch. I (7-1-93 Edition)

GROUND-WATER MONITORING LIST I-Continued

C o m m name2

, ' i

mNioaniline .___ p-Niiroaniline ..... Nitrobenzene .............................. N i rophend ............................. pNilrophend .............................

N-NilroJo&n-krtylamine ........... N-Nilrmodiethylamine ................ N-Nilruxdirnethylamine .............

propylnlrosamine. N-NilroJomethylethylamin N-NiWoJororphdine ...... KNilroq%peridine .................... N-Nilrc6opyvd&ne ................... SNttmetduidine ...................... Parathim .................................... Polychlorinated biphenyls: PCBS

Polychlorinated dibenzop

Polychlorinated dibenzolurans;

Penlachlaobenzene ....... Pentachloroethane .......... PenMlaOnilrotenZene .......... Pentachlorophenol .................... Phenacetin ................................ Phenanthrene ...........................

dioxins: P C O k .

PCOFs.

meno( ....................................... pmenylenediamine .................

2-Picdine .................................. Ra-lamide ................................. Ropiaririle: Emyl cyanide ....... F y m .......................................

S i b ._ ................................ Silvex: 2.4BTP _____..._..I_._ Slyme ............................ SUmQe ................................... 2 . 4 . ~ ~ 2.4.5

Tl - iChkJtwheno~ acid. 2.3.7,ETCDO; 2.3.7.6

Tebachlaodbento-p&lin 12.4.sTebza31laobeorene _... 1.1 .13-Teb;lCNaoethane ........

8%

:AS RN3 1

99-09-2 1oO-01-6 98-53

8 8 - 7 s

1 00-02-7

56-57-5 924-1-

62-7- 86-304

621-64-7

3595456 59-89-2

1-75-4 930-55-2 94-558 -8-2

See Note 7

See Note 8

See Note 9

608-335 76-01-7

82- 8746-5

62-44-2 a5-01-8

1 w s 2

106-504 298-02-2

10906 .4

!395048-5

107-124

129-004

11046-1

94-59-1 (Tow

(Tw

55-m-5

93-72-1 100-424

1849&25-1 s3-764

174&014

w &.3x?o4

Chemical abstract!, service index name.

enzenamine. 3ni l re ...................................... enzenamine. kni t re ...................................... mzene. nitre ............................

hend. 2-nitre .......................................................... hend. C n i l r e ..........................................................

ithanamine. N-ethyl-Knirw ................................. Aethanamine. N-rnethyUICnibw ........................... knzenamine. N-nitruseKphenyC ........................... -Propanamine. KnirosoNpropyC ......................... ithanamine. N-melhyCKn ................. Aorpholine. 4nitrose ...... ................. 'iperidine. 1 -nilrose ................................................. )yrdiiine. 1-nitros ................................................ 3enzenamine. 2-melhyC5nrtre ............................... 'hosphorothi~k acid. O.WielhycO(4-nitrophenyll

ester I ,l'-Biphenyl. chlcfo derivatives ............................... ~ibenzo(b.e][l.4]dioxin. chlwo deriiatives ...............

libenlofuran. chlcfo den'vatives .............................. 3enzene. pentachlwe _ _ _ _ _ _ .......... Ethane. pentachlore ......... .......... 3enzene. penlachlmibe ...................................... Dhend. pentachlore .......... .....

4cetamide. N-(belhoxyphenyl) ................................ Phenanthrene ........................................................... Phenol ........................................................... 1.4-Benzenediamine ................... Phowhorodihioic acid. 0.Wiethyl S

F'yndine. 2methyC .................................................... Benzamide. 3.5-dkhkwc-N-( 1.1 dirnelhyC2

hopanenitrile ............................................................ Pyrene

[(ethyllhiolrnethyl] ester

propynylk.

Pyndine ._ . 1.5Benzodioxde. 542pmpenyl)- Selenium ..

Siker

Pqmnoic add. 2 - ( 2 . 4 0 % k h b ~ a y ~ .......... Benzene. ethenyC ............................................ SulMe .... ...................................... -.. . AC€f!jc acid. (2.4.5- biChla0phenoxy)- ._.I ..-.. Dibenzo(b.e] [ l .4~i , 2.3.7.Bletrachbm ......... Benzene. 12.4.5teaachkxo- .............................. Emane. 1.1.1 2 - t e b a c h b ..................................

330

neth- odss

8270 8270 8090 8270 8040 8270 8040 8270 8270 8270 8270 8270 8270 8270

8270 8270 8270 8270 8270 8270

8080 8250 8280

8280

8270 8240 8270 8270 8040 8270 8270 8100 8270 8040 8270 8270 81 40 6270 8240 8270 8270

801 5 6240 81W

82a 827c 601 c n4c 7741 6 0 1 C n6c 81% 8(nc

903( 81%

m 627( 801 ( 82a

8270

827a

- wL

( W n ) S - 53 50 40 10 5

10 10 50 10 10 10 10 10 10

10 10 10 10 10 10

50 100

0 01

0 01

10 5

10 10 5

50 10

200 10

1 10 10 2

10 5

10 10

60 5

200 10 5

10 10

750 20 20

100 2 i 5

1o.ooo 2

m

OM

10 5 5

..a

nvironmental Protection Agency

GROUNDWATER MO

Common name2

1,lp2-TetrachloroeUv1e .......... retrad\laOethylene;

P&l&hylene: TBtr&hlorcethene.

~.4,bTetrachlorcphed .......... iebaemyl dilhiyrophosphate:

SuHdePp. llmlliirn .....................................

Ttl .............................................. Tdwne ...................................... elduidine ................................ Toxaphene

12.4-Tmwobenzene .............. 1.1 .l-Trichloroethane:

Meulylchlorolm. 1.1 2-Trichlormhane ................. Tkhboelhylene;

Trichkmxhene.

Tkhlaonwrunemane .............. Z4STrichlomphend ........... '1.. Z4.GTrichlorcphend ..... :: ...... + 12STichkwcqrc~ane ............ :: 9.QO-Triethyl @osphomlhioatc G - T r i n M z e n e ................. . vanadium

W acetate ............................ '% dr)aide ..

Page 69: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Environmental Protection Agency R. 264, App. IX

GROUNDWATER MONITORING LIST r--Continued -~

Common name2

1.1 p.2-Telrachloroethane .......... Tetrachloroethylene;

pefchlWOelhyl@ne; TelraChlorcaVlene.

2.3.4.BTelrachlacphend .......... TWaeVlyl dithiopyc@osphale:

Thallium ..................................... smew.

En ........ ............._.... _...................

Toxaphene ..........................

1.1.l-TdchlWWth~e; My lch lo ro lon .

1.1 ZrTrichlor~thane ................ . Tricnlaoelhylene;

TnChlaoemene. .

2.4.5-Trichlorcphend .............. ..

12.5Trichloroprcpane .............. 0.O.GTriethyl phosphwoulioata SymTrinitrobenzene _....... .

Vinyl w e ............................ Vinyl chloride ............................

XP-e (tow) ............................ 2.k - ..... .. ...........................

mend. 2 .3 .4 ,wem~w~e ....................................... . . acid ([(HO),P(S)IP). letraethY(

.lhakJm ....._.. .... ..._....... .... .. .. .. ............................... met

Tu, Benzene. d y e

Benz-ne. 2mechyt ~ ............... Toxaphene

enrene. 19.4-lkhlO(o- ............................................ mane. 1 . l , l&trn ................................................ mane. 1.1 2-bichloro .............................................. mene. bichbom ........................................................

w. b i c h w n m ............................................. hend. 2.4.SWkhM herd. 2 . 4 . m - ................................................ topane. 12.3tichlorc- ....... 'hosphomthioic add. 0.o.O-triethyl &€Y ._..._..___.... bum. 1.3.54nn- lanajium ...._ .. __..... ......... .. .... ...... . ...

8240

8270 8270

6010 7840 7841 7870 8020 Q40 8 7 0 8080 850 8270 8240

8010 8240 8010

E240 . 8010 8240 8270 8040 8270 8010 8240 8270 827c 601c 791C 791 1 E2a m1c Q4(

'

802 e24 601 795

0.5 5 0.5 5

10 10

400 1 .ooo

10 8.000

2 5

10 2

10 10 5

0.2 5 1

5 10 5

10 5

10 10 5

10 10 80

2.000 40

5 2

10

5 5 20 50

331

Page 70: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Pt. 245 do CFR Ch. I (7-1-93 Edition)

0 Practical Guantitation Limits (POLS) are the bwesc wncermations 01 anafyles in ground waters that can be relatjy dam- mined within Specified limiis of precision and a c ~ a c y by me indicated methods undw routine laboratory cpraling con- The POL5 listed are generally stated to m e signifcant @ure CAUTION: The POL values in many c s e s are based only on a general estimate la the method and not m a determination for individual compounds: POLS are not a pan of the regulation.

TPdychlotinated biphen s (CAS RN 133646-3): mis c a w wntains congener chemicals. including umstitums d Arccbr-1016 (CAS RN 12t74-11-2) Arocbr-1221 (CAS RN 1110628-2) Arocla-1232 (CAS RN 11141-16-5) W a - 1 2 0 2 (CAS RN -21-9) Arcc1w-1248 (CAS RN 12672-29-6) Amdor-l254'(CAS RN 1109769-1). and Arccbr-;260 (CAS 11096+2*). m e Wishown is an average w u e lo^ PCB &ers.

*This category wntains cmgener chemicals indud' IeWachbrodibenrc-pdioxins (see also 2.3.7.BTCoo). penlachlorodibenzwixins. and hexachlWcdibenz&ioxins.%e WC shown is an average value for PCDO c

DThis cat- ' contains congener chemicals. inchdng lewxhbrOdibenzofurans. pentachkrodiben%%T hexachlorcdibenzofuans. The WL shown is an average value la PCDF congeners.

PART 265-INTERIM STATUS STAND- ARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERA- TORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DIS- POSAL FACILITIES

Subpart A-General

Sec. 265.1 Purpose, scope. and applicability. 265.2-265.3 [Reserved] 265.4 Immlnent hazard action.

Subpart B-General Facility Standards

265.10 Applicability. 265.11 Identlficatlon number. 265.12 Required notices. 265.13 General waste analysis. 265.14 Security. 265.15 General inspection requirements. 265.16 Personnel tralning. 265.17 General requirements for ignltable.

reactive, or incompatible wastes. 265.18 Location standards. 265.19 Constmctlon quality assurance pro-

Subpart C-Preparedness and Preventbn

gram.

265.30 Applicabllity. 265.31 Maintenance and operation of facil-

265.32 Required equipment. 265.33 Testing and maintenance of e q u i p

265.34 Access to communicacions or alarm

265.35 Required aisle space. 265.36 CReserved] 265.37 Arrangements with local authorities.

Subpart D-ConHngency Phn and Emergency Procedures

ity.

ment.

system.

265.50 AppUcability. 265.51 Purpose and implementation of con-

tingency plan. 265.52 Content of contingency plan. 265.53 Copies of contingency plan. 265.54 Amendment of contingency plan. 265.55 Emergency coordinator. 265.56 Emergency procedures.

332

Subpart E-Manifest System, Recordkeeping, and Reporting

Sec. 265.70 Appllcabllity. 265.71 Use of manifest system. 265.72 Manifest discrepancies. 265.73 Operatlng record. 265.74 Availability. retention. and disposi-

tion of records. 265.75 Biennial report. 265.76 Unmanlfested waste report. 265.77 Additional reports.

Subbrt F-Ground-Water Monitoring

265.90 Applicability. 265.91 Ground-water monitoring system. 265.92 Sampling and analysis. 265.93 Preparatlon. evaluation, and re-

sponse.

Subpart G-Closure and Post-Closure

.94 Recordkeeping and reponing.

265.110 Applicability. 265.111 Closure performance standard. 265.112 Closure plan: amendment of plan. 265.113 Closure: t ime allowed for closure. 265.114 Disposal or decontamlnatlon Of

265.115 Certification of closure. 265.116 Survey plat. 265.117 Post-closure care and use of PrOP

265.118 Post-closure plan; amendment of

265.119 Post-closure notices. 265.120 Certification of completion of post-

equipment. structures and soils.

erty.

plan.

closure care.

Subpart H-Financial Requlremenft

265.140 Applicability. 265.141 Deflnltions of terms as used Ln tbB

265.142 Cost estimate for closure. 265.143 Financlal assurance for closure- 265.144 Cost estimate for post-closure We . 265.145 Financlal assurance for post-ClO@

care. 265.146 Use of a mechanism for flnancld 89-

surance of both closure and post-dOSure care.

subpart.

265.147 Liability requirements.

Environmental Protection A!

265.148 Lncapaclty of owners c guarantors. or financial lnst:

265.149 Use of State-required ml 265.150 State assumptlon of res1

Subpart I - U s e and Manogs Containers

265.170 Appllcabllity. 265.171 Conditlon of conta inen . 265.172 Compatibility of wast

265.173 Management of contain. 265.174 Inspecttons. 265.175 (Reservedl 265.176 Speclal requirements f0

reactlve waste. 265.177 Special requirements f

ible wastes.

talner.

Subpart J-Tank SydC

265.190 Appllcabllity. 265.191 Assessment of exlstin

tem's integrity. 265.192 Design and lnstallatlon

systems or components. 265.193 Contalnment and detf

leases. 265.1% General operating r e w f 265.195 Inspections. 265.1% Response M leaks or s

posltlon of leaking or unfit systems."

265.197 Closure and post-CloSur 265.198 Special requirements fc

reactive wastes. 265.199 Special requirements !

ible wmtes. 265.200 wmte analysis and t r ia 265.201 Special requiremenw f

of between 1M) and 1.ooO kg'' mulate hazardous waste In 1

Subpart K-SudoCe I m p

265.220 Applicablllty. 265.221 Design and operating rf 265.222 Action leakage rate. 265.223 Contalnment system. 265.223 Response actions. 265.224 (Reserved] 265.225 waste analysis and t r i a 265.228 Monitoring and lmpect 265.227 CReservedl 265.228 Closure and post-cloSUr 265.m Special requirements f(

reactive waste.

lble wwtes. ' 265.230 Special requirements

subpart L-Waste R 265.250 Appllcabllity. 265.251 Protection from wind. 265.252 waste analysis. as.= Containment. 265.254 Design and operating r(

Page 71: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

Enclosure 1

Page 71 of 87 94-RF-09541

- - - > . . -

.- DRAFT _.

BUILDING 889 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN APPENDIX C - APRIL 6, 1987 WISRC -

. - . .. . .. -

Rocky Flats Plant

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Rocky Flats Plant Golden, Colorado

September, 1994

Page 72: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

g+RF-c)YJ-. 1

Page 72 of 87 __--- Waste Stream Identification Rocky F l a t s Plant

April 6, 1987

BUILDING 889

EQUIPMENT DEKONTAMINATION

. -.. 8 .

Equipment and waste materials are decontaminated here. equipment is returned to FU & D. ‘ W a s t e materials are crated for off-site disposal.

Decontaminated

One process has been identified in this building.

Processes identified for this building are: - _ _ 1. Decontamination

99. Composite Waste

. . ._ . . . . . . . . . ,.e . ...

889-1

Page 73: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

. 94-RF-09541 Page 73 of 87 -

--. I

I

.'. > . . . . . . . . . . . __-

I

I

t

4 I I

Page 74: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

tllb,"J-.i: I

94-RF-09541 Page 74 of 87

, --.

. ..

. _ _ .

.. ._ . . . '. t . . . . . .. ,. : ...*'

. .

..__. '.

. . .

1 P

Page 75: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

&. 9 Rocky Flats Plant

BUILDING a e s WASTE STREAM SAMPI

~~

Haste

INQ

Sampling Report April 6, 1987

I

Page 76: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

. ---.,

. .. . ,

1" :> . . , ',L .i . . . . . , ' ,: , . . ..

' I .A2

LI IC. Ib .JYIG 4

94-RF-09541 L Page 76 of 87

- - - -- __ Waste Stream Ident i f ica t ion

Rocky Flats Plant April 6 , 1987

BUILDING 889 SOLID W A S T E MANAGENENI' UNITS

EFER. ROOn HASTE OR Nil. NO. PROC. NO. - --

33

989

9%

99 I

40.32

40.33

1

05120

106 05130

05140

05320

05320

OPERATIOHAL REGWITORY UNIT NFaE STATUS STATUj

Druls S t m Cleaning Currently in Peraitted Unit

Solid Waste Crusher Currently in Non-Hazardous hste Unit

White 55 Gallon Drums of hrren t ly in Paints and Solvents Operation Accumulation Ared

Waste Crate Currently in Non-Hazardous Haste Unit

opera tion

Operation . - - - .

Hazardous kste WDay

Operation

Process Wzte Tank (In Currently in Pernitted Unit 866 Funp Station) 7-4 operation

Process Waste Tank (In Currently in Perri t k d Unit 866 Pump Station) 1-5 operation

889-5

Eppty druas, office Waste furniture and EM f i l t e r s mpac to r

Waste paints and solvents- brun - __ -

Katerial that mes cut of Crate the solid waste crusher such as crushed eapty drums ,crusked off ice furniture and crushed cold EPA fi l ters.

process waste pH 7-10

process waste pH 7-10

403 gal SST tdak

460 gal SST t a l k

Page 77: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

C I I L I U ~ U I C I

. 94-RF-09541 , 4 Page 77 of 87

..-. , , . . , . . .. '

: 1 DECONTAPIIU4TION . . . . . . . . ' ._ . . . Process

tjaste Stream Ident i f ida t ion Rocky F l a t s P lan t

April 6 , 1987

Description : Contaminated equipnent is steam cleaned when necessary. waste can also be compacted by crushing before f inal disposal.

Hot

33 D r u m Steam Cleaning Permitted Unit

.., ' ... , . . 3 . . , . I i. , .. .

Waste Streams: . 05120 process w a s t e

889-6

- I

Page 78: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

_--..

. - .-.. . '. . ... :,. . _ .. . , . .. , . .

. . - . . ' . .-

- - . - . 94-RF-09541 . .

8 . -'Page 78 of 87 . .. . * . . . - ..- . ..

.- . ._. .. Giakte Stream Ident i f ica t ion -.-. :

Rocky Fla t s P lan t ..: . . April 6 , 1987

. .. . - - . _ I

. .. . Waste : 05120 PEfmss WASTE

Building : 889 DEa)NTAMINATION Process : 1 DECONTAMINATION

Reg. C l a s s : €MamxxJs*

: AQUEOUS Transport : P F O X S S D R A I N Storage : TANKS

Type Quantity : 1800 gtzl/yr Gen. Freq. : PER DAY N e x t Dest., : COMPOSITE W A S T E 05320 Pretreatment: NONE Final Disp. : BUILDING 374

X ind ica tes c l a s s i f i c a t i o n is a e d primarily upon process knowledge.

- . ..

Description: Steam washdown from steam cleaning. Washdown m y contain any con taminants that w e r e present on the e q u i p e n t that w a s cleaned. Also contains detergent used i n steam cleaning. Dnrms (inside and ouLside) are a l s o washed.

SWMU Association:

- I

989 Sol id Waste Crusher Non-Hazardous Waste Unit Waste compactor

Sampling Report: W a s t e stream not sampled - prac t i ca l consideration: al t sample see waste 05320 sampled 9/3/86

Page 79: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

a-,-nr-uJ;I-r I

Page 79 of 87 -- -~

Waste Stream Identification Rocky Flats Plant

April 6, 1987 /->. t. 1. , .:.: I : .. . . ... . . . . .. ...... ,.. Process .:*

Description :

Waste Streams:

99 alYFosITE WASTE

Solid and aqueous waste streams generated in Building 889 nre cornposited Ad sent to B u i l d i r g s f o r disposal.

05140 Waste Box 05320 889 process waste tanks

664 and 374, respectfully,

889-9

Page 80: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

r

-~ 94-RF-09541

. Page 8O.of 87 . . - Waste Stream Ident i f icat ion-

Rocky F la t s Plant

W a s t e : 05140 WASTE Bo);

Building : 889 EQurpMENT DECONTAMINATION Process : 99 CoMFoSITE W A S T E

Reg. C l a s s : MIXED RADIOACTIVEt:

: SOLID Transport : " R K X N G Storage : 4'X4'X7' CRAm

5.pe Quantity : 20000 lbs/yr Gen. Freq. : CONT.INuouS N e x t Dest. : PIMED WASTE STORACE Pretreatment: COMPACI'LNG Final Disp. : MJXED W A S T E STORAGE

t i nd ica t e s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n is based p r k i l y upon process knowledge. -. - . _ - - -

Description: Several s o l i d w a s t e streams from Building 881 are cornposited i n 4 ft. x 4 f t . x 7 f t . w a s t e crates. These waste streams include 03300, 03320, 04410, 04460, 04420, 03770, 03410, 03450, 03480, 04510, 04540, 04550, 04720, 05450, 05570, 05490, 05500, 05530, &d 04750.

SWMU Association:

970 Vhite 55 Gallon Drum Non-Hazardous W a s t e Unit Container 99 1 Waste C r a t e Non-Hazardous W a s t e Unit C r a t e

Sampling Report: W a s t e stream not sampled - prac t i ca l consideration:.comp s o l i d

r

Page 81: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

i i l k l r j u i c

94-RF-09541 i

W a s t e : 05320 889 WASTE TANKS

Reg. C l a s s : HAzARDxs

rype : AQUEOUS Quantity : 22400 gal/yr Gen. Freq. : 2-5 /MONTH Pre t rea tment : EioNE

1

Page 81 of 87 -.. _ _ ~ . _ Waste Stream Identification i

Fbcky F la t s Plant !

i . I :

April 6, 1987 i ; : I . .

L

Transport : R K C E S S D R A I N Storage : 400 GAL. STNLS. STL. Next Dest. : BUILDING 374 Final Disp. : BUILDING 374

- - . _

Description: 889 waste drains to a small floor sump, then is pumped automatically to two above g d e 400 gallon stainless steel tanks in building 866. From there the waste is pumped below grade to valve vault 6 and t hen to 374 via the valve v a u l t system. Waste includes stream 05120.

-. SWMU Assmiation:

40.32 Process Waste Tank (In Permitted Unit 400 gal SST

40.33 Process Waste Tank ( I n Permitted Unit 400 g a l SST 866 Pump Station) T-4 tank

866 Pump Station) T-5 tank

Sampling Report:

SAEIPLE SAMPLJE HO DATE SAWLE METHOD ANALYSIS SAMPLING .mATION

05320 09/05/86 pour Spec. C o d , Corrosivity, VALVE ON Reactivity, E L M e t a l s , RECIRCULATING Fwlip Vol. Organics, Semi-Vol. FOR 889 TANKS Organics, Radio Chemistry

Reactivity, HSL Metals, VOl. organics, semi-Vol. Organics, Radio

05321 09/05/86 coliwasa Spec. Cond, Currosivity,

/ Chemistry

Page 82: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

94- RF-0954 1 C Page 82 of 87

--- - _..______

Waste Stream Identification Rocky Flats Plant

..F--:. April 69 1987 I , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._. Sample No. 05320

Building: 889 Waste No. 05320 Date Sampled: 09/05/86 Description: PXKESS WASTE TANKS

Inorganic: Batch No. Not Assigned I

Ignitability: Not requested.

Cormsivity: Pass [ pH=7.10 J

Reactivity: (DO03).. Cyanide: <5.0 ug/g Sulfide: 52.0 u g / g

EP Tox Metals: Not requestxd.

Volatile: Batch No. 8609-791-(0210)

A7 Methylene Chloride (F001,F002,U080) ......... 12000 ug/ l * B * HSL Acetone (UOO2).. ............................ 6 1000 ug/l t B * HSL Trichloroethene (U228) ...................... 33000 W / l A7 T o t a l Xylenes (Fc03). ....................... 3600 U g / l

1 I

Semi-volatile: Batch No. 8609-808-(0270)

....... .... _. c ;,\. HSL b i s ( 2 - E t h y l h e x y 1 ) P h t l a t e (U028) ........... / ......... (;, <;..;::;&; . :.:. ......... - PesticidesPSB’s: Not requested. . .

HSL Metals: Batch No. 8

HSL Ili luulinum.......................,,.........,. KSL B a r i u m (0005) ............................... HSL Beryllium (PO15) ............................ HSL Cadmium (DOO6,FOOS) ......................... HSL calcium..........................,..,....... HSL chromium (D007,F006,F019) ................... HSL Cobalt...................................... HSL Copper ...................................... HSL Iron..........,............................. HSL Lead (D008) ................................. HSL Magnesium. .................................. HSL Manganese...... ............................. HSL ~ e r ~ ~ r y (~oog,ui51) ......................... HSL Nickel (FO06) ............................... HSL Po&sium....... ............................. HSL Sodium......... ............................. HSL vanadium.. .................................. HSL Zinc........................................

. . . Radio-&&stry: Batch NO. 22651-6-2 . . - . . . : .:.

2200 ug/l

29700 3190 3300 193

54000 3650 324 3750 66150 6840 13800 1350

2590 38200 668000

148 14400

13.0

889- 12

I

Page 83: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

n ,,GL I 4 14 a c 81..

94-RF-09541 Page 83 of 87 - -_ .

Waste Stream Identification Rocky Flats Plant

April 6, 1987

Sample No. 05320 Bui ld ing : 889 Waste No. 05320 Date Sampled: 09/05/86 Description: mcocEsS W A S T E TANKS

Gross Alpb ... 36000 t/- 2000 pCi/ml Gross Beta.... 46000 +/- 1000 pCi/ml pU-239........ 14 +/- 4 pCi/d

p C i W Am-241.... .... 11 +/- U-233,234.. e . a 1400 +/- 200 pCi/d U-238 ......... 5800 +/- 400 p C i / d Tritium....... . . -0.07 +/- 0.22 p C i / d

6

. - . -. _ _

889-1 3

Page 84: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

. / ‘

....

. :,-. . . . . . . . * . :;

... :,.:.‘Y

. . . . . - ....

.._-

‘J

Sample No. 05321 Bui ld ing : 889 Waste No. 05320 Date Sampled: 09/05/86 Description: DUP OF 05320

Inorganic: Batch No. Not Assigned

Ignitability: Not requested.

Cormsivity: Pass [ pH=7.08 J

Reactivity: (DO03).. Cyanide: <5.0 ug/g Sulfide: 46.0 u g / g

. - . . _ _ -

I 2 Tox Metals: Not requested.

Volatile: Batch No. 8609-791-(0220)

A7 Methylene Chloride (FOOl,F002,U080) ......... HSL Acetone (UOOZ) .............................. HSL Tetrachloroethene ........................... A7 Toluene (F005,F024,U220) .................... A7 T o t a l Xylenes (F003) ........................

A7 l,l,l-Trichloroethane -. (FOOl,F002) ...........

Semi-volatile: Batch No. 8609-808-(0260) .

HSL 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol. .................... HSL bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthhalate (U028) ........... HSL di-n-Butyl P h t h a l a t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pesticides/PCB’s: Not requested.

i i ,L l “3” .C i I

94-RF-09541 Page 84 of 07 - --

Waste Stream Identification Rocky Flats Plant

April 6, 1987

7500 ug/l 1: B 1: 2600 wf/l 1: B t

40000 ug/l 1600 W / l 1700 ug/l 3500 U/l

1200 ug/l 6200 ug/l 3500 ug/l

HSL Metals: Batch No. 8

,

55/88 889-11

Page 85: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

...

ri

Sample No. 05321 Building: 889 W a s t e No. 05320 h t e Sampled: 09/05/86 Description: WP OF 05320

HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL HSL

Al~um.. . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . Arsenic (DO041 .............................. Barium (DOO5). .............................. Beryllium (P015) ............................ Cadmium (D006,F006) ......................... Calci u r n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ChSOmilnp (DG07,F006,F019) ................... Cloba_ l t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . , . . * , . . . . Copper ......................................

- ._ . . . .

Iron........................................ Lead (DOO8) ................................. bgnesi um................................... Elanganese .................................... M e r c u r y (DOO9,U151) ......................... Nickel (F006) ............................... Potassium................................... Silver (Doll) ............................... Sodium...................................... V a n a d i ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , . , . , . , . . . , . . . . . . . Zinc............... ..........................

Radio-chemistry: Batch NO. 22651-6-3

Enclosure 1

Page 85 of 87 94-RF-09541

Waste Stream Identification'---- M k y Fla ts Plant

April 6, 1987

Gross Alpha... 27000 +/- Gross Beta . . . . 31000 +/- Pu-239........ 18 +/- Am-241.. ...... 11 +/- U-233,234 ..... 1100 +/- U-238. ........ 5900 +/- Tritium... .... 0.12 +/-

27200

3190 3000 192

50700 3490 327 3740 61400 6330 12600 1120

2500 36200

475000 164

14700

14.4

10.0

16.0

1000 $i/d 1000 $i/d

4 pCi/ml 6 $i/d

200 pCi/ml 400 p C i / d 0.23 pCi/ml

c

Page 86: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

i . . .. .

. . . . - . . _. .

RADIOLOGICAL OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS Rout ine Air Sampl i ng

ROI 4.1 i i - ;n . .. .. Page 14 o f 19

March 04, 1991 , . ._ . ..

-. _-......--..-

ATTACHMENT 9.3

KOVAL FORMULA GRAPH

. ..

K

.70

- .73 .68 .64 .59 .56 .52 .49 .46 .43 $40 .38 .35 .33 .31 .29 .27 .255 .24 ,225 .2 1 .16 .13 ,096 .07 1 .058 .043 .032 .026 .019 .016 a 1 2

Page 87: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

d- b M * c;, E

rn m r-- rn

f 4.

C.

,

m t

94-RF-09541' Page 87 of . . 87

z 0

L

DATE. NOVEMBER. 1366

REV. NO 1 APRIL. 'I 987

Page 88: -1 · A review of document CO-4022-D, Decontamination and Waste Processing (Building 889), indicates that steam and compressed air cleaning were the primary methods of decontamination

I I-. Figure 4-1 BUILDING 889 SAMPLE LOCATIONS I -\. . .

(112)

. - a m .

I Enclosure 1 :

94-RF-09541 ! Page 15 of 87

94DN0907, 8/25/94 at 15: 10 I b / % K

I

t

BUBLBING 809 HAZARDOUS MATERiAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS

107, 108, 152 . c c .- . r,c- RCOfae§ oops, bus, Lo,

EGBG Rocky Flats Plant Golden, Color ado

I I

a- I mwiMEEswuG=scaENc=, - mcn t

D e n v e r . Color ado