1 9/18/2015 revised 9/24/2015 alaska department of education & early development elizabeth...

60
1 9/18/2015 Revised 9/24/2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Elizabeth Davis, Administrator, Standards Implementation District Test Coordinator Webinar Series 2015-16 Assessment Calendar AMP Performance Tasks Overview

Upload: godwin-dennis

Post on 30-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

19/18/2015 Revised 9/24/2015Alaska Department of Education & Early DevelopmentElizabeth Davis, Administrator, Standards Implementation

District Test Coordinator Webinar Series

2015-16 Assessment CalendarAMP Performance Tasks Overview

Content TodayReview 2015-16 Alaska Assessments Calendar

Overview of AMP Assessment System Development Timeline

Overview of the AMP Performance Tasks•Design •Scheduling•Timeline for Implementation 2

Throughout: EED

Website Web-walk

WebEx

Calling in– use the code

Chat feature- choose who to chat with

Raise hand

Mute

Patience 3

4

Objectives

1. Review the 2015-16 assessments calendar in order to facilitate your scheduling.

2. Review the AMP performance task design to assist you with communicating with educators in your district.

3. Review the AMP content assessment administration calendar to facilitate your district and school AMP scheduling at the district, school, grade, student level.

4. Review the AMP the performance task administration scheduling considerations to • gather your feedback, • prepare you for DTC training, • and facilitate your district and school

assessment scheduling.

Standards Implementation Team

Elizabeth Davis Brian LaurentAdministrator, St.Im. Data Management Supervisor

Deb Riddle, Math & Science SpecialistAnji Gallanos, K-5 Standards & Early ChildhoodTo be hired: Secondary ELA SpecialistMelora Gaber, Head Start, Early Childhood

Kari Quinto, AMP Program CoordinatorTo be hired: Assessments AdministratorJeanne Foy, NAEP Coordinator, DP, special projectsErin Thompson, CCRAGrace Gray, DLM & ACCESS 2.0Rachel Schweissing, DTC LiaisonTo be hired: support

5

Director of Teaching & Learning: Dr. Susan McCauley

Director of Assessment & Accountability: Margaret MacKinnon

Comprehensive System of Student Assessment

4 AAC 06.700. Purpose Statewide student assessment is one component in a system to measure and make accountable the state education system. The purposes of statewide student assessment specifically are to (1) ascertain on a statewide basis the extent to which children of the state are attaining state standards as described in 4 AAC 06.737; (2) produce statewide information to facilitate sound decision making by policy makers, parents, educators, and the public; and (3) provide a focus for instructional improvement.

6

7

Developmental Profile

College Career Readiness Assessment (CCRA) ACT, SAT, WorkKeys

NAEP

ELP Assessment (ACCESS 2.0)

Alaska Alternate Assessment (Alaska-DLM)

Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) ELA, Math, Science

Literacy Screener

Alaska Comprehensive System of Student Assessments

Required Assessments

8

Special Considerations for 2015-16Developmental Profile n/a

College Career Readiness Assessment (CCRA) ACT, SAT, WorkKeys

ACT online available this year

Last year of statewide administration per HB44

NAEP 15/16 is not a NAEP year

ELP Assessment(ACCESS 2.0)

New online assessment this year. Paper available by request.

Alaska Alternate Assessment (Alaska-DLM)

Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) ELA, Math, Science

Science added to AMP this year (grades 4,8,10 only).

Field testing performance tasks, listening.

Literacy Screener Regulations to repeal currently out for public comment.

9

education.alaska.gov The purple star is the link into all assessments information.

The blue star is where you find standards and instruction information.

Some information is in both places due to the link between the topics.

10

11

Note: the Science SBA link is only for 2015 test administration follow-up. The science test is shifting to AMP this year.

These links lead to specific information about each assessment, including deadlines, requirements, and resources.

12

13

Comment on proposed regulations by selecting the link in the footer of the EED webpage

education.alaska.gov

14

2015-16 assessment calendar for all required state assessments.

15

16

17

18

Standards Implementation TeamElizabeth Davis, AdministratorBrian Laurent, Data Management Supervisor

Deb Riddle, Math & Science SpecialistAnji Gallanos, K-5 Standards & Early ChildhoodTo be hired: Secondary ELA SpecialistMelora Gaber, Head Start, Early Childhood

Kari Quinto, AMP Program CoordinatorTo be hired: Assessments AdministratorJeanne Foy, NAEP Coordinator, DP, special projectsErin Thompson, CCRA Program CoodinatorGrace Gray, DLM & ACCESS 2.0Rachel Schweissing, DTC LiaisonTo be hired: support

19

20

AMP Assessment System Development Timeline

21

22

23

24

25

English Language Arts Listening Items Field Test 2016

Part of 4 sections (parts) of ELA content assessment.

•Students listen to short passage.•Students can replay the passage.•Question and answer choices are displayed.

• Practice items available for listening in January via Testlets at each grade

26

AMP Instruction

Performance Tasks:Math and English Language Arts

27

EED Content Specialists are creating resources for teachers for the use of performance tasks in instruction.

September 29: full day train-the-trainer workshop in collaboration with ASD which will result in modules for use statewide

If you are interested in having a similar training please contact [email protected]

28

The AMP Assessment Development Timeline phases in the AMP Performance Tasks during year 2 and 3.

Structure of Math Performance Task

The mathematics performance task presents a multi-part question based on a real-world scenario and asks the student to communicate their reasoning, show their work, or model an equation as a part of their response.

Solutions build on one

another

Covers more than one standard

Multi-step

29

Math

Perfo

rman

ce

Task

s

30

Each student will complete one math performance task.o The performance task includes 4-8 questions based on

one scenario.o The solutions to single questions within the

performance task build on one another.o If a student makes a procedural error (e.g., multiplies

incorrectly), and then applies the correct logic going forward, partial credit is given.

Most students will complete the math performance task in 30 minutes.

Math

Perfo

rman

ce

Task

s

31

All students will have access to AMP Universal Tools for the math performance task, including:

• Text-to-speech: The decoding/reading and comprehension of the text is not the focus of the performance task.

• Equation editor: allows a student to write equations and symbols not available on a standard keyboard. Available for practice in January as part of interim testlet.

• Students may use scratch paper.

Math

Perfo

rman

ce

Task

s

32

All students will have access to AMP Universal Tools for the math performance task, including:

• Calculators: Computation is not the focus of the performance task. Calculators are part of the test engine and available on-screen to students.o Grades 3-5: Standard calculatoro Grades 6-8: Standard calculator and scientific

calculator (Texas Instruments 30XS)o Grades 9-10: Standard calculator and graphing

calculator (Texas Instruments 84)

Math

Perfo

rman

ce

Task

s

Reminder: AMP Universal Tools are available to all students and do not need to be activated by educators.

33Screen shots from Educator’s Guide to KITE Client http://kiteassessments.org/sites/default/files/KITE_files/KITE_Client_Educator_Guide.pdf

Text-to-speech (TTS) allows a student to listen to a computer-synthesized voice read the text and graphics associated with a test item. TTS is always visible in the on-screen toolbox. The student selects the play button to listen.

34

ELA

Perfo

rmance

TasksInclude

evidence from the text in their

writing

Narrative, Informative

or explanatory, Opinion or

argumentative

Read/Write

Connection

Engage with texts

and resources

Structure of ELA Performance Task

The English language arts (ELA) performance task asks students to complete two activities:

1. Read several related resources and, based on information in guiding questions, take notes on the texts;

2. Write in response to a prompt using the information from the readings.

35

ELA

Perfo

rmance

Tasks

ELA Performance Task Activity One:

Student reads and takes notes on texts, images, diagrams and other resources.

• The 2-4 resources presented may be texts, images, and/or diagrams. The maximum total word count per grade is:• Grades 3-5: 750 words• Grades 6-10: 1000 words

• The student is provided with a framing statement, guiding questions, and cues for the type of writing in activity two (argumentative, informational, or narrative).

• Most students will complete the ELA performance task activity one in 30 minutes.

36

ELA

Perfo

rmance

Tasks

ArgumentativeHow are gorillas similar to other primates?How are they different?

InformationalWhat heart problems are gorillas in captivity facing?How have zookeepers and veterinarians tried to treat or control the heart problems of gorillas?

NarrativeHow do other primates communicate?What evidence do you see of their intelligence?

Example of Guiding Questions

37

• All students will have access to text-to-speech as an AMP Universal Tool for the performance tasks. Decoding the text is not the focus of the performance task.

• Students take notes using the computer-based tool or on paper.• Note: if on paper, schools need to and securely store and then

destroy.

• Students can mark up the text using the computer-based tools, such as “tags.”

• Students can use self-made graphic organizers.

ELA Performance Task Activity One, cont. ELA

Perfo

rmance

Tasks

38

ELA

Perfo

rmance

Tasks

39

ELA Performance Task Activity Two

Student composes a piece of on-demand writing, using their notes and the resources, in response to a prompt.

• The texts and resources from activity 1, and all notes, and are available to the student.

• The writing prompt is presented to the student to read and/or via text-to-speech.

• Student reminders are provided that define the components of a good response (e.g., “Use relevant and accurate details/evidence from two or more resources to your support argument.”)

ELA

Perfo

rmance

Tasks

40

ELA Performance Task Activity Two

• The performance task is a piece of “on-demand writing.”

• There is no length requirement. The general expectation per grade level is:• Grades 3-5: 1-3 paragraphs• Grades 6-10: 3-5 paragraphs

• Most students will complete the ELA performance task activity two in 45 minutes.

ELA

Perfo

rmance

Tasks

In the Alaska ELA Standards, on-demand writing asks students to complete a complete draft in a single writing session. This may be as short as 10 or up to 60 minutes. Writing on-demand pieces should address a variety of text types and purposes, including opinion, informative/explanatory, and narrative. Students are expected to draft, revise, and edit within the time period.

Rubrics available on EED website

41

42

“Preparing students for tests need not be separate from delivering good writing instruction. To the contrary, it can underscore best practice and exemplify best teaching.”

Gere, Christenbury and Sassi, 2005

43

Key Details

Analyzing text features

Word Meaning

Grammar

and

punctuation

44

2016 AMP Administration Window & Scheduling

45

AMP 2016 Adm

inistration Window

46

ELA & Math Grades 3-10 March 29 – April 29 (May 6 by approval) Each content area has 4 sections (25+15+15+15). Sections may be given over the course of several days. A section must

be completed within one day. ELA & Math sections may be administered on unique schedules at the

school, grade, or individual level. Window closures per grade level are for scheduled testing. If necessary,

make-up testing can occur for any grade during any day within the window (March 29-April 29).

Science Grades 4, 8, 10 March 29 – April 29 (May 6 by approval) 3 sections (grade 4 25+12+12; grades 8 & 10 25+15+15) Sections may be given over the course of several days. A section must

be completed within one day. Science sections may be administered on unique schedules at the

school, grade, or individual level.

Best practice is to limit student testing time to one hour sessions and total time per day of approximately two hours.

AMP 2016 Adm

inistration Window

AMP Computer-based Content Assessments

47

ELA & Math Grades 3-10 Each content area has 4 sections (25+15+15+15). Sections may be given over the course of several days. A section must be completed within one day. ELA & Math sections may be administered on unique schedules at the school, grade, or individual level. Science Grades 4, 8, 10 3 sections (grade 4 25+12+12; grades 8 & 10 25+15+15) Sections may be given over the course of several days. A section must be completed within one day. Science sections may be administered on unique schedules at the school, grade, or individual level.

Best practice is to limit student testing time to one hour sessions and total time per day of approximately two hours

Schools with CBA waivers and students with accommodations

AMP 2016 Adm

inistration Window

48

The performance task scheduling recommendations ensure that these unique items are provided to students in the positive and secure testing environment needed to produce valid and reliable results.

2016: Field Test of six forms per grade level & content area

Performance tasks are “scored” during a process called “range finding” to determine anchor papers for each achievement level. Students do not receive scores.

2017: Operational Test, one form per grade level & content area

Performance task scores will be reported on student score reports.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

49

The performance task window is 9 days long. It opens Tuesday, March 22, 2016, and closes Friday, April 1, 2016. Completing all performance tasks by April 1, 2016, allows time for

the hand-scoring of items and the timely return of student reports.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

NEW! Districts may extend the PT window up to April 8, 2016 by contacting [email protected] or [email protected].

50

It is recommended that performance tasks be administered district-wide to all students in the same grade on the same day.

Grouping administration by grade-level minimizes the risk of a test proctor or student sharing secure item information.

EXAMPLE of Performance Task Schedule – grouping students by grade

Tuesday 3/22 Wednesday 3/23 Thursday 3/24 Friday 3/25

Grade 3,5,7 ELA 1

Grades 4, 6, 8 Math

Grades 3,5,7 ELA 2

Grades 4, 6, 8 ELA 1

Grades 3,5,7 Math

Grades 4, 6, 8 ELA 2

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

51

For both mathematics and ELA, it is recommended that students complete the performance task prior to beginning the remaining sections of the assessment for that content area.

• This allows performance tasks to be completed early in the window to provide time for hand-scoring and the production of reports; this leaves the remainder of the test window for the remaining sections of the content assessments.

• Other testing sessions may be scheduled on the same day as the performance tasks.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

52

The ELA performance task is designed to be administered over two consecutive days. This allows students adequate time to interact with the texts and

resources during activity one. It mirrors classroom presentation of similar instructional tasks. The ELA PT must be scheduled in two sessions, either on the

same day or on consecutive days. It is recommended that these be held on two consecutive days for optimum student performance on the task, but could be scheduled for a morning and afternoon session.

Please note: the scheduling of assessments should reflect this design. If a student misses an assessment session the requirement can be flexed to accommodate make-up sessions.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

53

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 (time shown in parenthesis is the amount of time most student need)Morning session (recommended schedule is for a 1 hour session)

ELA performance task activity 1(30 minutes)

ELA performance task activity 2(45 minutes)

ELA sections 1+2(60 minutes)

ELA sections 3+4(50 minutes)

Afternoon session(recommended schedule is for a 1 hour session)

Math performance task(30 minutes)

Math content sections 1+2(60 minutes)

Math content sections 3+4(45 minutes)

Total average time 60 minutes or 1 hour

80 minutes or 1 hour 20

minutes

90 minutes or 1 hour 30

minutes50 minutes

This example limits individual student testing time per session to one hour. The number of testing sessions and days will vary depending on specific school and district configurations.

This example shows test sessions that could be scheduled during the students’ normal instructional block (e.g., administer the ELA assessment during the school’s existing literacy block). Current assessment administration research recommends one hour sessions to provide the best conditions for students to demonstrate their skills and abilities.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

54

Day 1(time shown in parenthesis is average time tested)

Day 2(time shown in parenthesis is average time tested)

Maximum scheduled time is a 4 hour block

ELA performance task activity 1 (30 minutes)

Math performance task (30 minutes)

Math sections 1+2+3+4 (105 minutes)

ELA performance task activity 2(45 minutes)

ELA sections 1+2+3+4 (110 minutes)

Total average time 165 minutesor 2 hours 45 minutes

155 minutesor 2 hours 35 minutes

This example limits the number of days a student is testing.

While testing for longer amounts of time per day is not recommended for optimal student performance on the assessments, these are options that districts can use to meet specific circumstances.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

55

Determining the best schedule for your districts, schools, and each grade or student.

Technology• Devices• Connectivity school and/or district-wide• Computer lab &/or device-cart availability

Instructional schedule • How might AMP testing be scheduled to cause the least

disruption possible to the rest of the instructional day?

Staffing• Test administrators• Support (technology and test administration)

Student group• Grade level• Accommodations (school decisions for small group testing

may need to be reviewed)

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

56

Summary of PT Scheduling RecommendationsTopic Required Recommendations

Performance task (PT) window

3/22 opening date; 4/1 close of window

One week prior to opening of content assessment, one week overlapping

4/8 closure of PT extended window

Complete all PTs by 4/1 if possible.

Returning PTs early in the window allows time for hand-scoring and production of reports.

Order of administration of performance tasks and content sections

PT window opens 3/22 and closes 4/1; the extended PT window closes 4/8.

Content assessments window open 3/29 and closes 4/29; the extended window closes 5/6.

The math PT, ELA PT activity 1 & activity 2 each have a unique passcode, similar to the 4 sections (or parts) of the content assessments. The “PT Window” is considered a separate event within KITE.

Complete content area PT prior to other sections of content assessment.

This window for PTs opens before the content assessments to facilitate the return of PTs early enough to allow for hand-scoring and timely production of reports.

Grouping students for administration of PT

Maintain a secure testing system that provides valid and reliable results for students, schools, and districts.

Group students by grade level for administration of PT to all students in same grade on same day. This minimizes the risk of compromising test security for teachers and students.

Scheduling the ELA PT

The two parts of the ELA PT must be scheduled for two different testing sessions. If scheduled on separate days, the days must be consecutive.

Schedule the two parts of the ELA PT to occur over two consecutive days, rather than two sessions in the same day. This mirrors instructional practices.

AMP Perform

ance Tasks Scheduling Considerations

57

education.alaska.gov

More performance task info

AMP Results Tool Kit

58

Please provide feedback on the tools in the tool kit and suggest additional tools that will assist you.

59