1 8-1 mcgraw-hill/irwin © 2003 the mcgraw-hill companies, inc., all rights reserved

17
1 8- 1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Post on 22-Dec-2015

238 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

1 8-1

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Page 2: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

2 8-2

CONCEPT/PROJECT

EVALUATION

PART

THREE

Page 3: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

3 8-3

Concept/Project Evaluation Figure III.1

Page 4: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

4 8-4 CHAPTER EIGHT

THE CONCEPT EVALUATION SYSTEM

Page 5: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

5 8-5

The Evaluation System Figure 8.1

Page 6: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

6 8-6

Cumulative Expenditures Curve% ofexpenditures

Time Launch

Many high-techproducts

Many consumerproducts

Figure 8.2

Page 7: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

7 8-7

Risk/Payoff Matrix at Each Evaluation

• Cells AA and BB are “correct” decisions.• Cells BA and AB are errors, but they have

different cost and probability dimensions.

Decision AStop the Project Now

BContinue to Next Evaluation

A. Product would fail ifmarketed AA BA

B. Product would succeed ifmarketed AB BB

Figure 8.3

Page 8: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

8 8-8

Planning the Evaluation System: Four Concepts

• Rolling Evaluation (tentative nature of new products process)

• Potholes

• People

• Surrogates

Page 9: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

9 8-9

Rolling Evaluation (or, "Everything is Tentative")

• Project is assessed continuously (rather than a single Go/No Go decision)

• Financial analysis also needs to be built up continuously

• Not enough data early on for complex financial analyses

• Run risk of killing off too many good ideas early

• Marketing begins early in the process

• Key: new product participants avoid "good/bad" mindsets, avoid premature closure

Page 10: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

10 8-10

Potholes

Know what the really damaging problems are for your firm and focus on them when evaluating concepts.

Example: Campbell Soup focuses on:

• 1. Manufacturing Cost

• 2. Taste

Page 11: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

11 8-11

People

• Proposal may be hard to stop once there is buy-in on the concept.

• Need tough demanding hurdles, especially late in new products process.

• Personal risk associated with new product development.

• Need system that protects developers and offers reassurance (if warranted).

Page 12: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

12 8-12

Surrogates

• Surrogate questions give clues to the real answer.

Real Question Surrogate Question

Will they prefer it? Did they keep the prototype product we gave them

after the concept test?

Will cost be competitive? Does it match our manufacturing skills?

Will competition leap in? What did they do last time?

Will it sell? Did it do well in field testing?

Page 13: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

13 8-13

An A-T-A-R Model of Innovation Diffusion

Profits = Units Sold x Profit Per Unit

Units Sold = Number of buying units x % aware of product x % who would try product if they can get it x % to whom product is available x % of triers who become repeat purchasers x Number of units repeaters buy in a year

Profit Per Unit = Revenue per unit - cost per unit

Figure 8.5

Page 14: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

14 8-14

The A-T-A-R Model: Definitions

• Buying Unit: Purchase point (person or department/buying center).

• Aware: Has heard about the new product with some characteristic that differentiates it.

• Available: If the buyer wants to try the product, the effort to find it will be successful (expressed as a percentage).

• Trial: Usually means a purchase or consumption of the product.

• Repeat: The product is bought at least once more, or (for durables) recommended to others.

Figure 8.6

Page 15: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

15 8-15

A-T-A-R Model Application10 million Number of owners of Walkman-like CD

players

x 40% Percent awareness after one year

x 20% Percent of "aware" owners who will try product

x 70% Percent availability at electronics retailers

x 20% Percent of triers who will buy a second unit

x $50 Price per unit minus trade margins and discounts ($100) minus unit cost at the intended volume ($50)

= $5,600,000 Profits

Page 16: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

16 8-16Points to Note About A-T-A-R

Model

1. Each factor is subject to estimation.

Estimates improve with each step in the development phase.

2. Inadequate profit forecast can be improved by changing factors.

If profit forecast is inadequate, look at each factor and see which can be improved, and at what cost.

Page 17: 1 8-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved

17 8-17

Getting the Estimates for A-T-A-R Model

XX: Best source for that item.

X: Some knowledge gained.

Figure 8.7

Item MarketResearch

Concept Test Product UseTest

ComponentTesting

Market Test

Market Units XX X X XAwareness X X X XTrial XX X XAvailability X XXRepeat XX XConsumption X X X XXPrice/Unit X X X X XXCost/Unit X XX