1 2 qiba profile. fdg-pet/ct as an imaging biomarker ... · 121 fdg-pet/ct imaging can be used for...
TRANSCRIPT
Page:1
1
2
QIBAProfile.FDG-PET/CTasanImagingBiomarker3
MeasuringResponsetoCancerTherapy4
Version1.135
TechnicallyConfirmedVersion6
November18,20167
Copyright©2016:RSNA 89
Notetousers–whenreferencingthisQIBAProfiledocument,pleaseusethefollowingformat:
FDG-PET/CTTechnicalCommittee.FDG-PET/CTasanImagingBiomarkerMeasuringResponsetoCancerTherapy,QuantitativeImagingBiomarkersAlliance,Version1.13,TechnicallyConfirmedVersion.QIBA,November18,2016.Availablefrom:RSNA.ORG/QIBA.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:2
10
11
TableofContents121.ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................313
SummaryforClinicalTrialUse......................................................................................................................414
2.ClinicalContextandClaims...........................................................................................................................515
ApplicationsandEndpointsforClinicalTrials...............................................................................................516
Claim:MeasureChangeinSUV.....................................................................................................................617
3.ProfileDetails................................................................................................................................................718
3.1.SubjectHandling....................................................................................................................................819
3.2.ImageDataAcquisition........................................................................................................................1520
3.3.ImagingDataReconstructionandPost-Processing..............................................................................2121
3.4.ImageAnalysis(UPICTSection9).........................................................................................................2422
3.5.ImageInterpretationandReporting(UPICTSection10)......................................................................2423
3.6.QualityControl.....................................................................................................................................2524
4.Conformance...............................................................................................................................................3525
4.1.ImageAcquisitionSite..........................................................................................................................3526
4.2.PET/CTAcquisitionDevice....................................................................................................................3627
4.3.ReconstructionSoftware......................................................................................................................4228
4.4.ImageAnalysisWorkstation.................................................................................................................4429
4.5.SoftwareVersionTracking...................................................................................................................4730
References.......................................................................................................................................................4831
Appendices......................................................................................................................................................5132
AppendixA:AcknowledgementsandAttributions.....................................................................................5133
AppendixB:BackgroundInformationforClaim.........................................................................................5434
AppendixC:ConventionsandDefinitions...................................................................................................5735
AppendixD:Model-specificInstructionsandParameters..........................................................................6236
AppendixE:DataFieldstobeRecordedintheCommonDataFormatMechanism...................................6637
AppendixF:TestingPET/CTDisplayandAnalysisSystemswiththeFDG-PET/CTDRO..............................6738
AppendixG:Vendor-neutralPseudo-codesforSUVCalculation................................................................7139
AppendixH:ConsensusFormulaforComputingLean-Body-MassNormalizationforSUVs.......................7340
AppendixI:QIBAFDGPET/CTImagingSiteandScannerChecklists...........................................................7641
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:3
42
1.ExecutiveSummary43
ThisQIBAProfiledocumentsspecificationsandrequirementstoprovidecomparabilityandconsistencyfor44quantitative FDG-PET across scanners in oncology. It can be applied to both clinical trial use as well as45individualpatientmanagement.Thisdocumentorganizesacquisition,reconstructionandpost-processing,46analysisandinterpretationasstepsinapipelinethattransformsdatatoinformationtoknowledge.47
The document, developed through the efforts of the QIBA FDG-PET Biomarker Committee, has shared48contentwith the FDG-PETUPICTprotocol, aswell as additionalmaterial focusedon thedevicesused to49acquireandanalyzetheFDG-PETdata.50
Part 4: Conformance Specifications
QIBA Profile for FDG-PET imaging
Part 2: Claim: The specific statement on measurement ability
Part 3: QIBA Acquisition Protocol: Based on UPICT protocol
Part 1: Executive Summary
51Figure1:IllustrationoftheProfilecomponents52
TheProfilePart3islargelyderivedfromtheFDG-PETUPICTprotocolforFDG-PETimaginginclinicaltrials.53In theUPICTprotocol, there isacarefullydevelopedhierarchywith tiered levelsofprotocolcompliance.54This reflects the recognition that there are valid reasons toperform trials usingdifferent levels of rigor,55even for the same disease/intervention combination. For example, a high level of imagemeasurement56precision may be needed in small, early-phase trials whereas a less rigorous level of precision may be57acceptableinlarge,late-phasetrialsofthesamedruginthesamediseasesetting.58
ThethreelevelsofcomplianceforUPICTprotocolsaredefinedas:59
ACCEPTABLE:failingtomeetthisspecificationwillresultindatathatislikelyunacceptablefortheintended60useofthisprotocol.61
TARGET:meeting this specification is considered tobeachievablewith reasonableeffort andequipment62andisexpectedtoprovidebetterresultsthanmeetingtheACCEPTABLEspecification.63
IDEAL: meeting this specification may require unusual effort or equipment, but is expected to provide64betterresultsthanmeetingtheTARGET.65
ACCEPTABLEvaluesarealwaysprovidedforeachparameterinaUPICTProtocol.Whenthereisnoreason66toexpectbetter results (e.g. in termsofhigher imagequality,greaterconsistency, lower radiationdose,67etc.),TARGETandIDEALvaluesarenotprovided.68
ThisProfiledrawsontheACCEPTABLEcomponentsoftheUPICTProtocol.LaterrevisionsofthisProfileare69
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:4
expected to draw on the Target and then Ideal categories of the UPICT Protocol. The Target and Ideal70categories are intended to account for advances in the field and the evolving state-of-the-art of FDG-71PET/CTimaging.TheseconceptsareillustratedinFigure2below.72
UPICT Protocol for FDG-PET imaging
• Acceptable...
• Target...
• Ideal...
• Acceptable...
• Target...
• Ideal...
• Acceptable...
• Target...
• Ideal...
Protocol sections
Protocol - Profile relationship
Part 4: Conformance Specifications
QIBA Profile for FDG-PET imaging
Part 2: Claim: The specific statement on measurement ability
Part 3: QIBA Acquisition Protocol: Based on UPICT protocol
Part 1: Executive Summary
73
Figure2.RelationshipbetweentheUPICTProtocolandtheProfile.74
SummaryforClinicalTrialUse75
TheQIBAFDG-PET/CTProfiledefinesthebehavioralperformance levelsandqualitycontrolspecifications76for whole-body FDG-PET/CT scans used in single- and multi-center clinical trials of oncologic therapies.77While the emphasis is on clinical trials, this process is also intended to apply for clinical practice. The78specificclaimsforaccuracyaredetailedbelowintheClaims.79
The specifications thatmust bemet to achieve conformancewith this Profile correspond to acceptable80levels specified in the FDG-PETUPICTProtocol. Theaimof theQIBAProfile specifications is tominimize81intra-andinter-subject,intra-andinter-platform,andinter-institutionalvariabilityofquantitativescandata82duetofactorsotherthantheinterventionunderinvestigation.FDG-PET/CTstudiesperformedaccordingto83thetechnicalspecificationsofthisQIBAProfileinclinicaltrialscanprovidequalitativeand/orquantitative84data for single time-point assessments (e.g., diagnosis, staging, eligibility assessment, investigation of85predictive and/or prognostic biomarker(s)) and/or for multi-time-point comparative assessments (e.g.,86responseassessment,investigationofpredictiveand/orprognosticbiomarkersoftreatmentefficacy).87
A motivation for the development of this Profile is that while a typical PET/CT scanner measurement88system (including all supporting devices) may be stable over days or weeks, this stability cannot be89expected over the time that it takes to complete a clinical trial. In addition, there are well known90differencesbetweenscannersandortheoperationofthesametypeofscanneratdifferentimagingsites.91
Theintendedaudiencesofthisdocumentinclude:92
• Technicalstaffofsoftwareanddevicemanufacturerswhocreateproductsforthispurpose.93• Biopharmaceutical companies, oncologists, and clinical trial scientists designing trials with imaging94
endpoints.95• Clinicalresearchprofessionals.96
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:5
• Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, technologists, physicists and administrators at healthcare97institutionsconsideringspecificationsforprocuringnewPET/CTequipment.98
• Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, technologists, and physicists designing PET/CT acquisition99protocols.100
• Radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and other physicians making quantitative measurements101fromPET/CTimages.102
• Regulators, nuclear medicine physicians, oncologists, and others making decisions based on103quantitativeimagemeasurements.104
Note that specifications stated as 'requirements' in this document areonly requirements to achieve the105claim,not'requirementsonstandardofcare.'Specifically,meetingthegoalsofthisProfileissecondaryto106properlycaringforthepatient.107
Asummaryofthespecificationsrequiredtoachievetheclaim,andformattedasachecklist,areprovidedin108Appendix I. The corresponding specifications are indicated as bold text in the tables of normative109statementsbelowasdescribedinAppendixC.ThischecklistmaybeusedtoascertainaPETimagingsite’s110qualificationforquantitativeimagingaccordingtotheQIBAFDGPET/CTprofile.111
2.ClinicalContextandClaims112
FDGisaglucoseanalogue.Therationaleforitsuseinoncologyisbasedonthetypicallyincreasedrateof113glycolysis intumorscomparedtonormaltissue.FDGistransported intotumorcellsviaglucosetransport114proteins,usuallyup-regulatedintumorcells.OnceinternalizedFDGisphosphorylatedtoFDG-6-phosphate;115it does not progress any further along the glycolytic pathway and becomes substantially metabolically116trapped.FDGuptakeisnotspecificfortumorcellsandtherearesomenormaltissuesandotherprocesses117with increased glucose turnover, e.g. infection and inflammation, that show elevated uptake or118accumulationofFDG.119
ApplicationsandEndpointsforClinicalTrials120
FDG-PET/CTimagingcanbeusedforawiderangeofclinicalindicationsandresearchquestions.Theseare121addressed more completely in the FDG-PET/CT UPICT Protocol (UPICT section 1.1). This QIBA Profile122specificallyaddressestherequirementsformeasurementoftumorFDGuptakewithPET/CTasanimaging123biomarkerforevaluatingtherapeuticresponse.124
Biomarkersusefulinclinicalresearchforpatientstratificationorevaluationoftherapeuticresponsewould125beusefulsubsequentlyinclinicalpracticefortheanalogouspurposesofinitialchoiceoftherapyandthen126individualizationoftherapeuticregimenbasedontheextentanddegreeofresponseasquantifiedbyFDG-127PET/CT.128
ThetechnicalspecificationsdescribedintheProfileareappropriateforquantificationoftumorFDGuptake129andmeasuring longitudinal changes within subjects. However,many of the Profile details are generally130applicabletoquantitativeFDG-PET/CTimaginginotherapplications.131
FDG-PETscansaresensitiveandspecificfordetectionofmostmalignanttumors[Fletcher2008].Coverage132foroncologyimagingproceduresintheUSbytheCentersforMedicareandMedicaidServicesareexplicitly133listedintheNationalCoverageDetermination(NCD)forPositronEmissionTomography(PET)Scans(220.6).134FDG-PET scans reliably reflect glucose metabolic activity of cancers and this metabolic activity can be135
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:6
measuredwithhighreproducibilityovertime.Longitudinalchangesintumor18F-FDGaccumulationduring136therapy often can predict clinical outcomes earlier than changes in standard anatomic measurements137[Weber2009].Therefore, tumormetabolic responseorprogressionasdeterminedby tumorFDGuptake138can serveasapharmacodynamicendpoint inwell-controlledPhase I andPhase IIA studiesaswell asan139efficacyendpointinPhaseIIandIIIstudies.Intumor/drugsettingswheretheprecedingphaseIItrialshave140showna statistically significant relationshipbetween FDG-PET response and an independentmeasureof141outcome, changes in tumor FDGactivitymay serve as theprimary efficacy endpoint for regulatory drug142approvalinregistrationtrials.143
Claim:MeasureChangeinSUV144
ConformancetothisProfilebyallrelevantstaffandequipmentsupportsthefollowingclaims:145
Claim 1: Tumor glycolytic activity as reflected by themaximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is146measurablefromFDG-PET/CTwithawithin-subjectcoefficientofvariationof10-12%.147
Claim2:AmeasuredincreaseinSUVmaxof39%ormore,oradecreaseof-28%ormore,indicatesthata148truechangehasoccurredwith95%confidence.149
Thefollowingimportantconsiderationsarenoted:150
1.ThisClaimappliesonlytotumorsthatareconsideredevaluablewithPET.Inpracticethismeanstumors151of aminimumsizeof 2 cmandabaseline SUVmaxof 4 g/ml (e.g. [Wahl 2009, de Langen2012]).More152detailsonwhattumorsareevaluablearedescribedinsection3.6.5.3.153
2.DetailsoftheclaimwerederivedfromareviewoftheliteratureandaresummarizedinAppendixB.154
3.Thepublishedasymmetriclimitsofrepeatabilityarebasedonobservationsthatthetest-retestSUVmax155differencesdonotfollowaNormaldistribution,butthatthedifferences(d)ofthelogarithmsofthetest-156retestSUVmaxvaluesdofollowaNormaldistributionwithastandarddeviationofSD(d)[Velasquez2009,157Weberetal.2015].The95%repeatabilitycoefficient (RC) in the log-Normaldistribution (i.e.±1.96SD(d))158aresymmetricabout themean.Thissuggests thatwhenthese limitsareconvertedback toSUVunitsby159exponentiation using RC = 100(exp(±1.96SD(d)) -1), the SUV RC limits are necessarily asymmetric. In160addition,notethatifthestandarddeviationisnotlargecomparedwiththelevelofthemeasurement,then161itcanbeshownthat100(exp(SD(d)/sqrt(2))-1) isapproximatelyequal to thewithin-subjectcoefficientof162variation,expressedasapercent[BlandandAltman1996,Velasquez2009].IfweassumeawCVof12%for163SUVmax,thentherepeatabilitycoefficientsare(-28%,+39%),consistentwiththefindingsbyVelasquezet164al.foradvancedgastrointestinalmalignancies,andthoseofWeberetalfornon-smallcelllungcancer.Asa165possiblymoreintuitivemotivationthatasymmetriclimitscanbeexpected,wesupposetwomeasurements166SUVmax1=7.0andSUVmax2=9.75,then167(SUVmax2-SUVmax1)/SUVmax1=+39%168(SUVmax1-SUVmax2)/SUVmax2=-28%169In other words, there is net change in SUVmax of 2.75 in either direction representing a physiological170differencebetweentwodiseasestates:Asanincreaseitis+39%,orasadecreaseitis-28%171
4.ThisClaimisapplicableforsingle-centerstudiesusingthesamescanner.Formulti-centerstudies,ifFDG-172PET/CTimagingisperformedusingthesamescannerandprotocolforeachpatientateachtimepoint(as173describedintheProfile),thenitisanticipatedthatthisClaimwillbemet.174
5.ThisClaimisbasedonSUVmaxduetotheevidenceprovidedinthescientificliterature.However,theuse175ofSUVmetricsderived from larger regions-of-interest (e.g.SUVpeak)are tobeencouraged,as theymay176
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:7
provideimprovedrepeatability.Inaddition,theuseofautomatedand/orcentralizedanalysismethodswill177further improve SUV repeatability. Note thatwhile relative limits appear to be appropriate for SUVmax178measures, itmay be that absolute limitsmay bemore appropriate for SUVs based onmean values for179volumetricROIs[NahmiasandWahl2008].180
6.WhiletheClaimhasbeeninformedbyanextensivereviewoftheliterature, it iscurrentlyaconsensus181Claimthathasnotyetbeensubstantiatedbystudiesthatstrictlyconformtothespecificationsgivenhere.182In addition, we note that this Claim should be re-assessed for technology changes, such as PSF (point183spread function)based reconstructionorTOF (timeof flight) imaging thatwerenotutilized inpublished184test-retest studies. A standard utilized by a sufficient number of studies does not exist to date. The185expectationisthatfromfuturestudiesand/orfieldtesting,datawillbecollectedandchangesmadetothis186ClaimortheProfilespecificationsaccordingly.187
188
3.ProfileDetails189
Thefollowingfigureprovidesagraphicaldepictionthatdescribesthemarkeratatechnicallevel.190
191Figure3:TheassaymethodforcomputingandinterpretingglycolyticmetabolicactivityusingPET/CTmay192beviewedasapipelineusingeitheroneortwoormorescansequences.ThemeasureSUVxreferstooneof193severalpossibleSUVmeasures,suchasSUVmax,SUVmeanorSUVpeak,withnormalizationbybodyweight194orleanbodymass.195
PatientsmaybeselectedorreferredforFDG-PET/CTimagingthoughavarietyofmechanisms.Inaddition,196patientsareoftenrequiredtoundergoscreeningaccordingtopre-scanrequirementssuchasfastinglevels197and/orserumglucoselevelsasdescribedbelow.198
TheimagingstepscorrespondingtoFigure1are:199
1) Patientsorsubjectsarepreparedforscanning(e.g.6hrfasting).FDGisadministered.Patientwaits200quietlyforbio-distributionanduptakeofFDG(typically60min)201
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:8
2) ScandatafromthePETandCTexamsisacquired.202
3) DatacorrectiontermsareestimatedandPET(andCT)imagesarereconstructed.203
4) Quantitativemeasurementsareperformed.204
5) Imagesarereviewedforqualitativeinterpretation.205
Notethatsteps4and5mayoccurineitherorderoratthesametime.Moredetailsontherequirements206aregivenbelow.207
Imagesmaybeobtainedatmultiple timepointsoverdaysorweeks,notablyataminimumof two time208points before and after therapeutic intervention for a response assessment as is considered by this209document.ThechangeinFDGuptakeistypicallyassessedasapercentageaccordingtotheformula:210
[(post-treatmentmetabolicactivity–pre-treatmentmetabolicactivity)/pre-treatmentmetabolicactivity]211x100%.Responsecriteriaarethenappliedtocategorizetheresponseassessment.Theseresponsecriteria212arebeyondthescopeofthisdocument,butarediscussedinthePERCISTproposal[Wahl2009].213
ThefollowingsectionsdescribethemajorcomponentsillustratedinFigure3:214
Section Title Performedby
3.1 SubjectHandling
Personnel,(includingTechnologistsandSchedulers)atanImageAcquisitionFacility
3.2 ImageDataAcquisition
Technologist,atanImageAcquisitionFacilityusinganAcquisitionDevice
3.3 ImageDataReconstruction
Technologist,atanImageAcquisitionFacilityusingReconstructionSoftware
3.4 ImageAnalysis ImagingPhysicianorImageAnalystusingoneormoreAnalysisSoftwaretools
3.5 ImageInterpretation
ImagingPhysicianbeforeorafterinformationobtainedbyImageAnalysisusingapre-definedResponseAssessmentCriteria
Imagedata acquisition, reconstruction andpost-processing are considered to address the collection and215structuringofnewdatafromthesubject.Imageanalysisisprimarilyconsideredtobeacomputationalstep216that transforms the data into information, extracting important values. Interpretation is primarily217consideredtobejudgmentthattransformstheinformationintoknowledge.218
3.1.SubjectHandling219
ThisProfilewillreferprimarilyto'subjects',keepinginmindthattherecommendationsapplytopatientsin220general,andthatsubjectsareoftenpatientstoo.221
3.1.1SubjectSelection,Timing,andBloodGlucoseLevels222
The study protocol should include specific directions as to themanagement of subjects with abnormal223fasting blood glucosemeasurementswhether known to be diabetic or not.While it is known that high224levels of circulating blood glucose reduce FDG uptake, there is a paucity of scientific data to suggest a225specific cutoff for abnormally highblood glucosemeasurements or if these subjects should be excluded226fromclinicaltrialsthatuseFDG-PET/CTscandata.Itisimportanttodefinehowsuchsubjectsandthedata227from their imaging studieswill bemanaged to ensure comparability of imaging datawithin and among228
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:9
clinicaltrials.Specifically,considerationshouldbegiventotheexclusionofsubjectswithabnormalfasting229bloodglucosewhenquantitativeFDG-PET/CT isbeingusedas thestudy’sprimaryendpoint.Refer tothe230FDG-PET/CTUPICTProtocolforDiabeticSchedulingandManagementdiscussion(UPICTSection4.2.2).Itis231alsorecommendedthatthestudyspecifieswhatlevelofwithinsubjectvariabilityinserumglucoselevelsis232acceptableacrosstimepointsandhowsubjectsthatfalloutsidethatrangewillbeinterpreted.233
3.1.1.1TimingofImagingTestRelativetoInterventionActivity(UPICTSection1.2)234
The study protocol should specifically define an acceptable time interval that should separate the235performanceoftheFDG-PET/CTscanfromboth(1)theindexinterventionand(2)otherinterventions(e.g.236chemotherapy, radiotherapy or prior treatment). This initial scan (or time point) is referred to as the237“baseline”scan(ortimepoint).Thetimeintervalbetweenthebaselinescanandtheinitiationoftreatment238should be specified as well as the time intervals between subsequent FDG-PET studies and cycles of239treatment. Additionally, the study protocol should specifically define an acceptable timing variance for240performance of FDG-PET/CT around each time point at which imaging is specified (i.e., the acceptable241windowoftimeduringwhichtheimagingmaybeobtained“onschedule”).Thetimingintervalandwindow242are dependent upon 1) the utility for the FDG-PET/CT imaging within the clinical trial, 2) the clinical243question that is being investigated and 3) the specific intervention under investigation. Suggested244parameters for timingof FDG-PET/CTwithinoncologic trials aremore completely addressed in theFDG-245PET/CTUPICTProtocolsection1.2.246
3.1.1.2.TimingRelativetoConfoundingActivities(UPICTSection3.2)247
Activities, tests and interventions thatmight increase the chance for falsepositive and/or falsenegative248FDG-PET/CT studies shouldbe avoidedprior to scanning. Theallowable interval between thepotentially249confoundingeventandtheFDG-PET/CTexamwillbedependentonthenatureoftheconfoundingvariable.250For example, inflammation may cause focally increased FDG-PET activity (e.g. from a percutaneous or251excisional biopsy of a suspiciousmass) ormight lead to the appearance of a non-malignantmass (e.g.,252hematoma)ontheCTportionofthestudy.Apercutaneousablationprocedureofaknownmalignantfocus253maycausefocallyincreasedFDG-PETactivityand/oranimmediatepost-ablationincreaseintheapparent254volumeoftheablatedtargetlesion.ThetimeofonsetandthedurationoftheincreasedFDG-PETactivity255and/orthechangeinlesionvolumemightbedifferentforthesetwoconfoundingfactors.256
If iodinated contrast is to be used for the CT portion of the PET/CT study, conflictwith other tests and257treatmentsshouldbeavoidedcongruentwithcommunitystandardsofcare(e.g.,thyroidscan).258
3.1.1.3.TimingRelativetoAncillaryTesting(UPICTSection3.3)259
AvoidschedulingteststhatmightconfoundthequalitativeorquantitativeresultsoftheFDG-PET/CTstudy260within the timeperiodprior to the scan. Forexample, a glucose tolerance test shouldnotbe scheduled261during the 24 hours prior to the performance of FDG-PET/CT. Similarly, other tests that might involve262increasingplasmaglucose, insulin,orcorticosteroid levels shouldalsobeavoided.Exercisecardiacstress263testing should be avoided during the twenty-four (24) hours prior to the performance of FDG-PET/CT.264Similarly,otherteststhatmightinvolvevigorousexerciseandtherebyincreasemusclemetabolicfunction265shouldalsobeavoided.266
3.1.2SubjectPreparation(UPICTSection4)267
Management of the subject can be considered in terms of three distinct time intervals (1) prior to the268imaging session (prior to arrival and upon arrival), (2) during the imaging session and (3) post imaging269
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:10
session completion. The pre-imaging session issues are contained in this sectionwhile the intra-imaging270issuesarecontainedinsection3.2.1onimagedataacquisition.271
3.1.2.1.PriortoArrival(UPICTSection4.1)272
Themain purpose of subject preparation is to reduce tracer uptake in normal tissue (kidneys, bladder,273skeletal muscle, myocardium, brown fat) while maintaining and optimizing tracer uptake in the target274structures(tumortissue).Formoredetail,refertotheFDGPETUPICTProtocol(Section4.1)thataddresses275(1)Dietary,(2)FluidIntake,and(3)OtheractivitiesthatmayaffecttissueFDGuptake.276
(1) Dietary277
a. Diabeticmanagement–RefertoFDG-PET/CTUPICTProtocolsections1.7.2and4.2.2278
b. Fastingstatus -Subjectsshouldnoteatany food (eitheroralorparenteral) forat leastsix279hourspriortotheanticipatedtimeofFDGadministration.280
(2) FluidIntake:Adequatehydration(beforeandafterFDGadministration)isimportantbothtoensure281asufficiently lowFDGconcentrationinurine(fewerartifacts)andtoreduceradiationexposureto282the bladder. Adequate hydration is especially important when contrast CT imaging will be used.283Whicheverhydrationstrategyisused(howmuchandwhentoadminister),theprotocolshouldbe284uniformamongsitesduringatrial.SpecifichydrationrecommendationsarepresentedintheFDG-285PET/CTUPICTProtocol(referenceSection4.2.1).Thefluidadministeredshouldnotcontainglucose286orcaffeine.287
(3) OtherActivities:TominimizeFDGuptakeinmuscle,thesubjectshouldavoidstrenuousorextreme288exercisebeforethePETexamforatleast6hours(preferablyforatimeperiodof24hours).289
The conformance issues around these parameters are dependent upon adequate communication and290oversight of the Scheduler or Technologist at the Image Acquisition Facility with the subject.291Communicationwiththesubjectandconfirmationofconformanceshouldbedocumented.292
3.1.2.2.UponArrival(UPICTSection4.2)293
Uponarrival1)confirmationofsubjectcompliancewithpre-procedureinstructionsand2)theoccurrence294of potentially confounding events (see listing in Section 4.2.1 of FDG-PET/CT UPICT Protocol) should be295documentedontheappropriatecasereportforms.296
There should be documentation of subject-specific risk factors including, but not limited to, previous297contrastreactions(ifiodinatedcontrastistobeused).298
3.1.2.3PreparationforExam(UPICTSection4.2.3)299
InordertoavoidheterogeneousphysiologicaldistributionoftheFDG,itiscriticalthatsubjectpreparation300afterarrivalandpriortoimagingisstandardizedamongallsitesandsubjectsthroughouttheconductofthe301clinicaltrial.302
• Thewaitingandpreparationroomsshouldberelaxingandwarm(>75°For22°C)duringtheentire303uptakeperiod (and for as long as reasonablypracticableprior to injection, at least 15minutes is304suggestedasacceptable).Blanketsshouldbeprovidedifnecessary.305
• The subject should remain recumbent or may be comfortably seated; activity and conversation306shouldbekepttoanabsoluteminimum.Forexample,thesubjectshouldbeaskedtorefrainfrom307speaking,chewing,orreadingduringtheuptakeperiod.Forbrainimagingthesubjectshouldbeina308
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:11
roomthatisdimlylitandquietforFDGadministrationandsubsequentuptakeperiod.309
• After FDG injection, the subject may use the toilet, preferably not for the initial 30 minutes310immediately after injectionof FDG, primarily to avoidmuscular uptakeduring thebiodistribution311phaseofFDG-uptake.Thesubjectshouldvoidimmediately(within5–10minutes)priortotheFDG-312PET/CTimageacquisitionphaseoftheexamination.313
• Bladdercatheterizationisnotroutinelynecessary;butifdeemednecessary(e.g.,fortheevaluation314ofasubjectwithapelvictumorsuchascervicalorprostatecancer),thecathetershouldbeplaced315prior to injection of FDG. If bladder catheterization is performed, additional strategies to avoid316trappinghighactivitypocketsofactivitywithinthebladdershouldbeconsideredsuchasretrograde317fillingofthebladdertodilutetheresidualactivity.318
• Following the administration of FDG, the subject should drink 500 ml of water (or receive by319intravenousadministration250-500mlofnon-glucosecontainingfluid).Fluidintakemayneedto320bemodifiedforthosesubjectsonfluidrestriction.321
• Forspecificareasofanatomicinterest(e.g.,tumorslocatedinthelowerabdomen,pelvisorkidney)322intravenousdiureticagentsmaybeused(e.g.,20–40mgoffurosemidegiven15minutesafterthe323administrationofFDG).Ifbladdercatheterizationisperformed,IVdiureticsshouldbeadministered324asdescribedheresoastoensurethattheconcentrationofactivityintherenalcollectingsystems325andbladderisrelativelydilute.326
• Sedationisnotroutinelyrequired,butisnotcontraindicatedprovidedthatthesedativeuseddoes327not interferewith the uptake of FDG. Sedationmay have utility in specific clinical circumstances328suchasinsubjectswithbrain,headandnecktumorsorbreastcancer,claustrophobicsubjects,or329children.Thesedativeeffectshouldlastforthedurationofimageacquisition;detailedspecifications330aredependentuponthemedicationusedandtherouteofadministration.331
• Theamountoffluidintakeanduseofallmedications(e.g.,diuretic,sedative)mustbedocumented332ontheappropriatecasereportform.333
• Subjects undergoing a CT scan should empty their pockets and remove any clothing containing334metalandanymetallicjewelryfromthebodypartstobescanned,changingintoahospitalgownif335necessary.336
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
HeightandWeight ImagingTechnologist
TheTechnologistshallmeasureanddocumentsubjectheightandweightandenterthisinformationintothescannerduringthePET/CTacquisition.
SubjectbodyweightshallbemeasuredatthetimeofeachPET/CTscanwithstandardizedmeasurementdevicesandwiththesubjectinanexaminationgownorlightclothing.SubjectheightshallbemeasuredanddocumentedatthetimeofbaselineFDG-PETscanwithstandardizedmeasurementdevice.Measurementofsubjectheightisnotrequiredateachsubsequenttimepointunlessothersubject-centricfactors(e.g.growthinpediatricpopulationorshrinkageinelderlypopulation)arerelevantincombinationwithaprolonged
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:12
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
intervalbetweenimagingtimepointssuchthatachangeinheightmightbesignificant.
Ifsubjectcannotbemovedfromthebed,thedateandsourceofinformationshouldbedocumented.
TheTechnologistshallmeasuresubjectheightandweightandenterthisinformationintoacommondataformatmechanismusedforrecordingallneededinformation(AppendixE).
• DiabeticMonitoringandManagement(UPICTSection4.2.2)337
The subject’s blood glucose level should bemeasured [using CLIA-approved, CLIA cleared, or equivalent338(outside US) glucosemeasurement device or laboratory] within the preceding 2 hours (ideally within 1339hour,especiallyinsubjectswithdiabetes)ofFDGadministrationanddocumented.340
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Bloodglucoselevelmeasurement
ImagingTechnologistorLabTechnologist
Within2hoursprecedingFDGadministration,shallmeasureanddocumenttimeofsubjectbloodglucosecollection.GlucosemeasurementshouldbeperformedusingaCLIAapproved,CLIAcleared,orequivalent(outsideUS)glucosemeasurementdevice.Ifthemeasurementisalwaysperformedatinjectiontimeorotherwiseaccordingtoaprotocolrelativetoinjectiontime,thismaybedocumentedintheprotocol.
Deviationsfromthisprocessshallbedocumented.
Bloodglucoseleveldocumentation
ImagingTechnologistorLabTechnologist
Shallentertheresultsofthebloodglucoseassayandthetimeofblooddrawonacasereportformorsimilarsubjectinformationsheet.
Shallentertheresultsofthebloodglucoseassayintoacommonformatmechanismusedforrecordingallneededinformation(AppendixE).
BloodglucoselevelThreshold
ImagingTechnologist
ShallenforcetheglucosethresholdsforimagingasdefinedintheProtocol;ifnot,thenreasonfornon-conformanceshallbeprovidedanddocumentedoncasereportformorsimilarsubjectinformationsheet.
Shalldocumentanyinformationonnon-conformancewiththeprotocolintoacommonformatmechanismusedforrecordingallneededinformation(AppendixE).
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:13
3.1.3.Imaging-relatedSubstancePreparationandAdministration(UPICTSection5)341
3.1.3.1.RadiotracerPreparationandAdministration342
3.1.3.1.1RadiotracerDescriptionandPurpose343
FDGshouldbeofhighqualityandpurity. Forexample, theFDGradiopharmaceuticalmustbeproduced344underCurrentGoodManufacturingPracticeasspecifiedbytheFDA,EU,EuropeanPharmacopeaorother345appropriate national regulatory agency. U.S. regulations such as 21CFR212 or USP<823>346Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography must be followed in the U.S. or for trials347submitted toUSRegulatory. For example, in theUS, for clinical practice, FDGproduction underNDAor348ANDAorunderINDforresearchpurposesismandatory.349
3.1.3.1.2RadiotracerActivityCalculationand/orSchedule(UPICTSection5.2)350
The18F-FDGactivityadministered rangesbetweenabout185–740MBq (5–20mCi).Theadministered351activitytypicallydependsuponthelocalimagingprotocol.Thelocalprotocolmayrequirefixedactivity,or352theactivitymayvaryasafunctionofvariousparameters includingbutnot limitedtosubjectsizeorage,353scanner model, scanning mode, or percentage of scan bed (slice) overlap. To date there are no data354providing evidence of superiority of parameter-dependent administered activity protocols. The exact355activityandthetimeatwhichactivity iscalibratedshouldberecorded.Residualactivityremaining inthe356tubing, syringe or automated administration system or any activity spilled during injection should be357recorded.TheobjectiveistorecordthenetamountofFDGradiotracerinjectedintothesubjecttoprovide358accuratefactorsforthecalculationoftheSUV.Theuseofautomatedactivitymeasurementandinjection359devicesisallowedifaccuracyisverified.360
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
AdministeredFDGRadiotracerActivity
ImagingTechnologist
TheTechnologistshall
1. Assaythepre-injectionFDGactivity(i.e.radioactivity)andtimeofmeasurement,
2. InjecttheFDGasprescribedintheprotocol,withintherangedefinedintheprotocol.
3. RecordthetimethatFDGwasinjectedintothesubject,
4. Assaytheresidualactivityinthesyringe(andreadilyavailabletubingandcomponents)afterinjectionandrecordthetimeofmeasurement.
ThesevaluesshallbeenteredintothescannerduringthePET/CTacquisition.
Forscannersthatdonotprovideforentryofresidualactivityinformation,thenetinjectedradioactivityshouldbemanuallycalculatedbydecaycorrectingallmeasurementstothetimeofinjectionandthensubtractingtheresidualradioactivityfromthepre-injectionradioactivity.ThenetinjectedradioactivityisthenenteredintothescannerduringthePET/CTacquisition.
Alldatadescribedhereinonactivityadministrationshallbe
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:14
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
documented.
Alldatashouldbeenteredintothecommondataformatmechanism(AppendixE).
3.1.3.1.3RadiotracerAdministrationRoute(UPICTSection5.4)361
FDG shouldbeadministered intravenously througha largebore (24 gaugeor larger) indwelling catheter362placedanatomicallyremote(e.g.,contralateralextremitytositeofdiseaseifatallpossible)toanysite(s)of363suspectedpathology, preferably in an antecubital vein. Intravenousports shouldnot beused, unless no364other venous access is available. If a port is used, an additional flush volume should be used. As365reproducible and correct administration of FDG is required for quantification purposes, extravasation or366paravenous administration should be avoided. If an infiltration or extraneous leakage is suspected, the367event and expected quantity should be recorded and the infiltration site should be imaged. The368approximateamountofinfiltrationshouldbeestimatedfromtheimageswherepossible.Iftheinfiltration369isgreaterthan5%oftheadministeredactivityandthequantitativeresultfromtheFDG-PET/CTstudyisa370primaryorsecondaryendpoint,thedatapointmightbecensoredfromrevieworthesubjectmightnotbe371included in the study. The anatomical location of the injection site should be documented on the372appropriatecasereportformorintheCommonDataFormatMechanism(AppendixE).373
Presuming that the IV access is properly functioning, the same route of administrationmaybeused for374iodinatedcontrastasisusedforFDG.375
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
FDGAdministration
TechnologistTechnologistshalladministerFDGintravenouslythroughalargebore(24gaugeorlarger)indwellingcatheterplacedanatomicallyremotetoanysitesofsuspectedpathology,preferablyinanantecubitalvein.Intravenousportsshouldnotbeused,unlessnoothervenousaccessisavailable.
Inthecaseofmanualadministration,athree-wayvalvesystemshouldbeattachedtotheintravenouscannulasoastoallowatleasta10ccnormal(0.9%NaCl)salineflushfollowingFDGinjection.Forautomatedinjectiondevicesalternateflushingmechanismsareallowed.
Suspectedinfiltrationorextraneousleakage
Technologistand/orPhysicianorPhysicist
Technologistshalldocumentanysuspectedinfiltration,leakage,orexternalcontaminationandconsiderscanningtheinjectionsiteand/orcontaminatedmaterials.
RecordtheeventandexpectedamountofFDGintothecommondataformatmechanism(AppendixE).
3.1.3.2CTContrastMaterialPreparationandAdministration376
TheuseofCTcontrastmaterialduringFDG-PET/CTimagingiscomplexandanalyzedindetailintheUPICT377
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:15
FDG-PETProtocol(Section3.2).Insummary,thepresenceofIVand/ororalcontrastmaterialimprovesthe378detectionoflesionswithCTandmayimprovetheanatomiclocalization,interpretation,andanalysisofthe379FDG-PET/CTexam.However,thepresenceofcontrastmaterialmayaffecttheattenuationcorrectionofthe380PETscanwithconsequentbiasinmeasuredSUVs.381
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
CTContrastAgent
Technologist TechnologistshallrecordthetypeandamountofCTContrastAgent.
1.Wasoralcontrastused:Type[Positive,Negative],amount(volumeincc).
2.WasIVcontrastuse:Amount(volumeincc),timeofinjection.
RecordtheeventandexpectedamountofCTContrastAgentintothecommondataformatmechanism(AppendixE).
3.2.ImageDataAcquisition382
ThissectionsummarizestheimagingprotocolsandproceduresthatshallbeperformedforanFDG-PET/CT383exam.DetaileddescriptionsareincludedinthereferencedFDG-PET/CTUPICTprotocolsections.384
Themotivationforcontrollingtheimageacquisitionastightlyasdescribedhereisthatoverthecourseofa385trial,hardwareandsoftwareupdateswilloccur.TheintentoftheProfileistoensurethattheinstrument386givesthesameresultsoverthedurationofthetrial.387
For consistency, clinical trial subjects should be imaged on the same device over the entire course of a388study.Iftheimagingrequirementsarequalitativei.e.forrelativequantitation,forexamplethepresenceor389absenceofalesionoralesionSUVrelativetoareferenceregion,thenareplacementscannermaybeused390ifitisproperlyqualified.Itisimperative,however,thatthetrialsponsorbenotifiedofscannersubstitution391ifitoccurs.392
Forclinicaltrialswithquantitativeimagingrequirements,asubjectshouldhaveallscansperformedononly393one scanner unless quantitative equivalence with a replacement scanner can be clearly demonstrated.394However, it shouldbenotedthat therearecurrentlynoacceptedcriteria fordemonstratingquantitative395equivalencebetweenscanners.ItisanticipatedthatfutureversionofthisProfilewillprovidesuchcriteria.396
The follow up scans should be performed with identical acquisition parameters as the first (baseline),397inclusiveofalltheparametersrequiredforboththeCTandPETacquisitions.398
TheFDG-PET/CTUPICTProtocol(Section7.1.1)describesscanningstrategiesthatcanbeusedinaclinical399trial. For strategy 1, there is no intent to obtain a diagnostic CT scan at the FDG-PET imaging session,400howevera low-doseCTscan isneeded forattenuationcorrection.For strategy2,adiagnosticCTscan is401obtained. There are further considerations that must be followed for each of the two strategies. The402workflow chosen for a given protocol should be described in the protocol and should be tailored403commensurate to the level of expectation of the obtained data (e.g. qualitative or quantitative SUV404analysis).405
Strategy1: For FDG-PET/CT inwhich theCT is used for attenuation correctionand localizationonly (not406intendedasaclinicallydiagnosticCT):407
• CTScout(i.e.topogramorscanogrametc.),followedby408
• CTforanatomiclocalizationandattenuationcorrection,followedby409
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:16
• PETEmissionscanacquisition410
Strategy 2: For FDG-PET/CT in which a clinically diagnostic CECT is also required, ONE of the following411optionsshouldbeused.Strategy2aispreferablesinceitavoidsany,allbeitpossiblyminimal,impactofIV412contrastenhancementonattenuationcorrectionandthereforeSUVdetermination.413
Strategy2a414
• FollowStrategy1(above)415
• AcquireanadditionalIVcontrast-enhanceddiagnosticCTscan416
Strategy2b417
• PerformanIVcontrast-enhanceddiagnosticCTscan418
• FollowStrategy1(above)419
420
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
ScanningStrategy(Workflow)
TechnologistTechnologistshallfollowProfilecompliantworkflowstrategy,whichwillbecompatiblewithAcquisitionDevicecapability.Thesameworkflowusedatbaselineshallbeusedatallsubsequenttimepoints.
421
Forbothstrategies,thereareseveralcommonissuesspecifictotheCTexamthatmayhaveanimpacton422quantitativeFDG-PEToutput,whichneedattentionandprotocolspecification.These include (1)contrast423material administration, (2) respiratorymotionmanagement instructions and (3) CT scanning technique424(kVp,mAsandpitch).Belowisasummaryoftheacceptablelevelofbehavior/procedureforeachofthese425threeissues.426
Ataminimum,all these issues shouldbeaddressed in theclinical trialprotocol, ideallywithconsistency427across all sites and all subjects (both inter-subject, and intra- and inter-facility) with the target of428consistencyacrossalltimepointsforeachgivensubject.Theactualdetailsof imagingforeachsubjectat429each time point should always be recorded. Any particular clinical trial should NOT allow some sites to430implementonestrategyandothersitestoimplementthealternative.431
CTExamVariablesandSpecifications:432
ContrastAgents - Thepresenceof a positive contrast agent (IVor oral), by affecting theCT attenuation433map,mayaffectSUVquantitation[Mawlawi2006].Ifthisweretheonlyconsideration,thenidealwouldbe434toprohibitCTcontrastadministration.However, insomeclinicalsituations(dependentupontumortype,435tumorbehavioror levelofanatomic interest), thebenefitofCTcontrastagentsmayoutweigh thesmall436errors induced in SUV measurement that may include increased SUV variability. Each protocol should437specifythedesiredapproachforthegivenstudy.Most importantly, foreachsubject, thesameapproach438shouldbefollowedforallimagingtimepoints.439
IncaseswhereCTcontrastagentsareused,therearetwomainstrategies:440
Strategy1:NoIV;dilutepositiveoralcontrastallowed441
Strategy2:Usenegativeordilutepositiveoralcontrastforthenon-attenuationCTscan.Ensurethat442
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:17
thediagnosticCTacquisition(whichmaybeperformedwithIVcontrast)isperformedconsistently443foragivensubjectacrossalltimepoints.444
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
CTContrastagent
Technologist CTcontrastagentsshallbegivencommensuratewiththeworkflowstrategyasselectedfromabove.
3.2.1ImagingProcedure445
ThePET/CTexamconsistsoftwocomponents,thePETemissionscanandtheCTtransmissionscan(which446mayhavemultiplecomponents).Fromthesedatasets,thenon-attenuation-correctedPETimagesmaybe447reconstructed for quality control purposes and attenuation-corrected PET images are reconstructed for448qualitative interpretation and quantitative analysis. Instrument specifications relevant to the Acquisition449DeviceareincludedinSection4Conformance–AcquisitionDevice.450
3.2.1.1TimingofImageDataAcquisition451
FDGuptake intobothtumorsandotherbodytissues isadynamicprocessthatmay increaseatdifferent452rates and peak at various time points dependent upon multiple variables. Therefore, it is extremely453importantthat(1)ingeneral,thetimeintervalbetweenFDGadministrationandthestartofemissionscan454acquisitionisconsistentand(2)whenrepeatingascanonthesamesubject,itisessentialtousethesame455intervalbetweeninjectionandacquisitioninscansperformedacrossdifferenttimepoints.456
Whilethe“target”traceruptaketimeis60minutes,the“acceptable”windowisfrom55to75minutesto457ensure that imaging does not begin prematurely so as to allow adequate tumor uptake of FDG and to458accountforthepracticalityofworkflowthatcanresultindelaysinimaginglaterthan60minutesafterFDG459injection.Theexacttimeof injectionmustberecorded;thetimeof injection initiationshouldbeusedas460the time to be recorded as the radiotracer injection time. The injection and flush should be completed461within one minute with the rate of injection appropriate to the quality of the vein accessed for FDG462administrationsoastoavoidcompromisingtheintegrityoftheinjectionvein463
When performing a follow-up scan on the same subject, especially in the context of therapy response464assessment,itisessentialtoapplythesametimeintervalwithtargetwindowof±10minutesprovidedthat465thescanmustnotbeginpriorto55minutesaftertheinjectionofFDG.Whilethereismajorityviewofthe466committee thata tighter (narrower) timewindow,e.g.+/-5minutes, isbetter, thecurrentperformance467specification iswritten tobalancepractical and ideal. If a limitedanatomy scan is obtainedat follow-up468afterawholebodyscanwasperformedatbaseline,oneshouldconsideradjustingthetimingofthefollow469up scan to be congruentwith the timing for the same anatomic region as achieved during the baseline470study.471
If, for scientific reasons, an alternate time (between activity administration and scan acquisition) is472specified in a specific protocol, then the rationale for this deviation should be stated; inter-time point473consistencymuststillbefollowed.474
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
TracerInjectionTime
Technologist ThetimeofFDGinjectionshallbeenteredintoPET/CTscannerconsoleduringtheacquisition.
TracerUptake Technologist TheTechnologistshallensurethatthetraceruptaketimeforthe
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:18
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Time:
baselinescanis60minutes,withanacceptablerangeof55to75minutes.
Whenrepeatingascanonthesamesubject,especiallyinthecontextoftherapyresponseassessment,theTechnologistshallapplythesametimeinterval±10minutesprovidedthatthescanmustnotbeginpriorto55minutesaftertheinjectionofFDG.
Thefollowingsectionsdescribetheimagingprocedure.475
3.2.1.2SubjectPositioning(UPICTSection7.2.1)476
Consistentpositioningavoidsunnecessary variance inattenuation, changes in gravity-induced shapeand477fluiddistribution,orchangesinanatomicalshapeduetoposture,contortion,etc.DuringPET-CT,subjects478shouldbepositionedinthecenterofthefieldofview(FOV),preferablywiththesubjects’armspositioned479overheadforwhole-bodyimaging(tominimizebeamhardeningandFOVtruncationartifacts).Inthecase480ofdedicatedbrainorhead/neckscans,thearmsshouldbepositioneddownalongthebody.Ifthesubjectis481physicallyunabletomaintainarmsaboveheadfortheentirewhole-bodyexaminationthenthearmscan482be positioned along the side before the start of the scan, unless the protocol specifically excludes such483subjects. Armpositioning in a particular subject should be consistent between the PET emission and CT484transmissionscansateachtimepointandshouldbeasconsistentaspossibleacrossalltimepoints.485
Respiratory motion causes SUV errors by two mechanisms: motion blurring and errors in attenuation486correctiondue tomismatchesbetweenCT-basedattenuationmapandemissiondata [Liu2009].Various487strategiescouldbeusedtominimize,documentandcompensateforrespiratorymotion.Shallowbreathing488shallbeperformedduringCTACacquisition(seeUPICTProtocolsection7.1.1).Thesubjectshould(a)be489monitoredand if breathingpattern is not consistentwith shallowbreathingexpectation, coached in the490breathingprotocoland(b) remainmotionless throughoutthescan. AlternateCTstrategies forachieving491PET/CTmatchmaybeconsideredifitcanbeverifiedthatPETACartifactsinthevicinityofthediaphragm492areroutinelyminimal.Itisofutmostimportancethatthepatientnotbeinend-inspirationphaseduringCT493forPET/CT.494
TheTechnologistshalldocumentfactorsthatadverselyinfluencesubjectpositioningorlimittheabilityto495complywithinstructions(e.g.breath-hold,shallowbreathing,remainingmotionless,etc.).496
497
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
SubjectPositioning
Technologist TheTechnologistshallpositionthesubjectaccordingtotheUPICTspecificationsand/orspecificprotocolspecificationsconsistentlyforallscans.
498
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PositioningNon-conformance
TechnologistTheTechnologistshalldocumentissuesregardingsubjectnon-conformancewithpositioning.
TheTechnologistshalldocumentissuesregardingsubjectnon-
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:19
conformancewithbreathingandpositioningusingthecommondataformatmechanism(AppendixE).
499
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Respiratorymotionminimization
Technologist IfthepatientisobservedtotakeadeepbreathduringtheCTscanitshouldbedocumentedandarepeatCTstudyshouldbeconsidered.
Respiratorymotionminimization
PET/CTScanner
ThePET/CTscannershallprovidemethodstominimizethePETimageerrorsintroducedbyrespiratorymotion.
500
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Breathingandmotionnon-conformance
Technologist
TheTechnologistshalldocumentissuesregardingsubjectnon-conformancewithbreathingandmotion.
TheTechnologistshalldocumentissuesregardingsubjectnon-conformancewithbreathingandmotionusingthecommondataformatmechanism(AppendixE).
501
3.2.1.3ScanningCoverageandDirection(UPICTSection7.1.1)502
FormostOncology indications, anatomic coverage should include from the skull base (external auditory503meatus)tothemid-thigh.Ifotherrangesareused,whichmaybeappropriateforspecificclinicaltrials,then504theclinical trialprotocolshouldprovidespecific instructionswith justification.Multiple factorsaffect the505decision regarding the scan direction. For example, scanning caudocranial minimizes effects from506increasing bladder activity during the scan, important for image quality in the pelvis. For some tumors507locatedinthehead,neck,orupperthoraxitmaybemoreimportanttostartattheheadtominimizehead508andarmmotionbetweenPETandCT.Scanningdirectionshouldbespecifiedintheclinicaltrialprotocol.It509is critical that for a given subject, scanning direction on baseline scans be duplicated at follow-up time510points.511
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
ScanningDirection
Technologist TheTechnologistshallscanthesubjectcaudocranialforwholebodyexaminationunlessotherwisespecifiedbytheprotocol.Eachpatientshouldbescannedconsistently(inthesamedirection)overalltimepoints.
ThescanningdirectionshallbeenteredintothePET/CTconsoleduringtheacquisitionandwillberecordedbythescannerintotheappropriateDICOMfield.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:20
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
AnatomicCoverage
Technologist TheTechnologistshallperformthescansuchthattheanatomiccoverageisacquiredaccordingtotheprotocolspecificationsandthesameforalltimepoints.
512
3.2.1.4ScannerAcquisitionModeParameters513
WedefineacquisitionmodeparametersasthosethatarespecifiedbytheTechnologistatthestartofthe514actualPET/CTscan.These include theacquisition timeperbedposition, thebedoverlap, theacquisition515mode(2Dor3D),withorwithoutcardiacand/orrespiratorygatingandCTtechnique.Theseparametersdo516not include aspects of the acquisition that occur earlier (e.g. injected amount of 18F-FDG or uptake517duration,CTcontrastagentinjection)orlater(e.g.reconstructionparameters)intheoverallscanprocess.518
PETAcquisition519
520
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PETacquisitionmode StudySponsor
ThekeyPETacquisitionmodeparameters(e.g.,timeperbedposition,acquisitionmode,withorwithoutgating)shallbespecifiedinamannerthatisexpectedtoproduceacceptablylowimagenoiseregardlessofthescannermakeandmodel.
Thekeyacquisitionmodeparametersshallbespecifiedaccordingtopre-determinedharmonizationparameters.
PETacquisitionmode Technologist
ThekeyPETacquisitionmodeparameters(e.g.,timeperbedposition,acquisitionmode,withorwithoutgating)shallbesetasspecifiedbystudyprotocolandusedconsistentlyforallpatientscans.
521
CTAcquisition522
FortheCTacquisitioncomponentofthePET/CTscan,thisProfileonlyaddressestheaspectsrelatedtothe523quantitativeaccuracyofthePETimage.InotherwordsaspectsofCTdiagnosticaccuracyarenotaddressed524in this Profile. In principle any CT technique (parameters include kVp, mAs, pitch, and collimation) will525sufficeforaccuratecorrectionsforattenuationandscatter.However,ithasbeenshownthatforestimating526PETtraceruptakeinbone,lowerkVpCTacquisitionscanbemorebiased.ThushigherkVpCTacquisitions527arerecommended ingeneral. Inaddition if there isthepotential forartifacts intheCT imageduetothe528choiceofacquisitionparameters(e.g.truncationoftheCTfieldofview),thentheseparametersshouldbe529selected appropriately to minimize propagation of artifacts into the PET image through CT-based530attenuation and scatter correction. Finally, extremely low x-ray flux can lead to a bias in CT images.531ProtocolsshouldallowhighenoughmAstoavoidthisartifact.532
533
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:21
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
CTacquisitionmode StudySponsor
ThekeyCTacquisitionmodeparameters(kVp,mAs,pitch,andcollimation)shallbespecifiedinamannerthatisexpectedtoproducecomparableresultsregardlessofthescannermakeandmodelandwithappropriateradiationdosesconsistentfortheroleoftheCTscan:diagnosticCTscan,anatomicallocalization,oraccuratecorrectionsforattenuationandscatter.
CTdosereductiontechniquesmaybeusedifdemonstratedtoretainquantitativeaccuracy.
CTacquisitionmode Technologist
ThekeyCTacquisitionmodeparameters(kVp,mAs,pitch,andcollimation)shallbesetasspecifiedbystudyprotocolandusedconsistentlyforallsubjectscans.
534
535
536
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
537
RegardingCTradiationexposure, the lowestradiationdosenecessarytoachievethediagnosticobjective538shouldbeused.Foragivenprotocol,thepurposeofperformingtheCTscan(withtheintentofattenuation539correctiononlyorattenuationcorrectionandanatomiclocalizationversusoneintendedfordiagnosticCT540purposeswithcontrastandbreath-hold)shouldbedetermined.TheCTtechnique(tubecurrent,rotation541speed,pitch, collimation, kVp, and slice thickness)used should result inas lowas reasonablyachievable542exposureneededtoachievethenecessaryPET imagequality.Thetechniqueusedforan imagingsession543shouldberepeatedforthatsubjectforallsubsequenttimepointsassumingitwasproperlyperformedon544thefirststudy.545
3.3.ImagingDataReconstructionandPost-Processing546
3.3.1ImagingDataReconstruction(UPICTSection7.3)547
Reconstructed image data is the PET image exactly as produced by the reconstruction process on the548PET/CT scanner, i.e. a PET image volume with no processing other than that occurring during image549reconstruction. This is always a stackofDICOMslices/files constituting a PET image volume that canbe550analyzed on one or more of the following: PET scanner console, PET image display workstation, PACS551system,etc.SeeSection4Conformance–ImageReconstructionSoftwareforspecifications.552
The PET reconstruction parameters include the choice of reconstruction algorithm, number of iterations553andsubsets(foriterativealgorithms),thetypeandamountofsmoothing,thefieldofviewandvoxelsize.554The quantitative accuracy of the PET image should be independent of the choice of CT reconstruction555parameters,althoughthishasnotbeenuniformlyvalidated.Inaddition,ifthereisthepotentialforartifacts556in theCT imagedue to thechoiceofprocessingparameters (e.g. compensation for truncationof theCT557fieldofview),thentheseparametersshouldbeselectedappropriatelytominimizepropagationofartifacts558intothePETimagethroughCT-basedattenuationandscattercorrection.559
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:22
560
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PETimagereconstruction StudySponsor
ThekeyPETreconstructionparameters(algorithm,iterations,smoothing,fieldofview,voxelsize)shallbespecified.Theimagevoxelsizeshouldbe<5mm(stronglyprefer3–4mm),with<3mmvoxelsforheadandneckimaging.
ThekeyPETimagereconstructionparametersshallbespecifiedaccordingtopre-determinedharmonizationparameters.
PETimagereconstruction Technologist
ThekeyPETreconstructionparameters(algorithm,iterations,smoothing,fieldofview,voxelsize)shallbefollowedandsetasspecified.
Correctionfactors Technologist
Allquantitativecorrectionsshallbeappliedduringtheimagereconstructionprocess.Theseincludeattenuation,scatter,randoms,dead-time,andefficiencynormalizations.
Calibrationfactors Scanner
AllnecessarycalibrationfactorsneededtooutputPETimagesinunitsofBq/mlshallbeautomaticallyappliedduringtheimagereconstructionprocess.
561
562
As part of the image reconstruction and analysis, correction factors for known deviations from the563acquisitionprotocolcanpotentiallybeapplied.Thesecorrectionscaninclude,forexample,compensation564formistakes indataentry[Kinahan2010],variations inFDGuptakeperiod[Beaulieu2003],anderrors in565scannercalibrationfactors[Lockhart2011].Correctionsforknowndataentryerrorsanderrorsinscanner566calibrationfactorsshouldbecorrectedpriortothegenerationofthereconstructedimages,orimmediately567afterwards.Correctionsthataremoread-hocinnature,e.g.correctionsforvariationsinFDGuptakeperiod568orplasmaglucoselevelsorpartialvolumecorrection,shouldonlybeappliedaspartoftheimageanalysis569step.Thatis,notusedtomodifythereconstructedPETimage.570
3.3.2ImageDataPost-processing(UPICTSection8)571
Processedimagedataareimagesthathavebeentransformedinsomemanner,includingbutnotlimitedto:572smoothing, image zoom, rotation/translation, resampling, interpolation, slice averaging,MIP, etc. This is573typically a stack of DICOM slices/files constituting a PET image volume. If image registration or574interpolation is required, thenwhere applicable, perform theROI analysis on theoriginal PET image set575usingappropriatelymodifiedROIs.TheintentistopreservethenumericalaccuracyofthetruePETimage576values.577
Standard whole-body FDG-PET oncology studies typically include all necessary data corrections and578processingwithinthereconstructionprocessanddonotrequireadditionalprocessingotherthan(e.g.)data579
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:23
de-identification.Moreadvancedstudiessuchasthoseincludingdynamicimagingmayrequireadditional580processingasspecifiedintheindividualprotocol.581
Briefly described here are concepts presented in UPICT Section 8.2.3 regarding difference between582‘visualized data’ and ‘data used for quantification’. At the acceptable level, for visual583inspection/interpretationofPET/CTdatausingthedisplayworkstation,bi-linearortri-linear interpolation584andzoomingmaybeusedtodisplaytheimagesinadifferentmatrixsizethantheoriginaldata.Inaddition,585so-calledmaximum intensity projections (MIP)may be generated as theymay facilitate localization and586detectionoflesions.Additionalprocessing,suchaszooming,re-binning,reorientationandfilteringmaybe587applieduponuserrequestonly.Usershouldbeabletomanipulatecolorscalesettings(window/leveland588colortable).Itshouldalwaysbepossibletoreverttothedefaultorientation,zoomandbinsize(preferably589a‘reverttodefault’buttonisavailable).590
591
3.3.3ImagingDataStorageandTransfer592
DiscussionsofarchivingPETdataoftenmention'rawdata'.Thisisanambiguoustermasitcanreferto:593scannerrawdata(i.e.,sinogramsorlist-mode)orimagerawdata.Toavoidconfusion,thetermrawdata594shouldnotbeusedwithoutmakingitclearwhichformisunderdiscussion.595ImagerawdataistheimagedataexactlyasproducedbythereconstructionprocessonthePETorPET/CT596scanner,i.e.,astackofDICOMslices/filesconstitutingaPETimagevolumewithnoprocessingotherthan597thatoccurringduringimagereconstruction.ThisisalwaysastackofDICOMslices/filesconstitutingaPET598imagevolumethatcanbeanalyzedononeormoreofthefollowing:PETscannerconsole,PETimage599displayworkstation,PACSsystem,etc.600Post-processedimagedataareimagesthathavebeentransformedafterreconstructioninsomemanner,601includingbutnotlimitedto:smoothing,imagezoom,rotation/translation,resampling,interpolation,slice602averaging,MIP,etc.Suchimagesmaybeonlyproducedfortemporaryanalysisanddisplay,ortheymaybe603savedasDICOMslices/files,andcanstillbeanalyzedononeormoreofthefollowing:PETscannerconsole,604PETimagedisplayworkstation,PACSsystem,etc.605Forarchivingatthelocalsiteorimagingcorelab(ifrelevant),themostimportantdataaretheoriginal606images,i.e.,theimagerawdata.Intheunlikelyeventthatthescannerrawdata(whichshouldbearchived607bythelocalsite)isrequiredforlaterreprocessing;thisshouldbemadeclearintheprotocol.608609
610
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Dataarchiving Technologist TheoriginallyreconstructedPETimages(imagerawdata),withandwithoutattenuationcorrection,andCTimagesshallalwaysbearchivedatthelocalsite.
IfprocessedPETimagesarerequired,theyshallbearchivedasseparatesecondarydatasets.
Ifscannerrawdataneedtobearchivedforfuturereprocessing,thisshouldbedefinedprospectivelyintheProtocol.
611
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:24
3.4.ImageAnalysis(UPICTSection9)612
The Image Analyst, through interaction with the Workstation Analysis tools, shall be able to perform613specifiedmeasurements. ImageAnalysis has qualitative and quantitative tasks. Both require consistency614andimagesofsufficientquality.Quantitativeimagingrequiresadditionalsystemcharacteristicsdescribed615furtherinthisProfile.616
3.4.1InputData617
TheoutputimagesofReconstruction,butnotPostprocessing,areconsideredtheinputforImageAnalysis.618IftheImageAnalystaltersinputdata(e.g.zoom),theoriginalinputdatawillbemaintainedasaseparate619file,bothtobestored.(SeeSection3.2)620
3.4.2MethodstoBeUsed621
Eachtissue/organtobe investigatedquantitatively(eithertumor lesionornormaltissue) ischaracterized622bydefiningaregion-of-interest(ROI)andcalculatingaparametersuchasthemaximumSUVwithintheROI.623Theimageanalystwillusetools(asdefinedinSection4.4Conformance–ImageAnalysisWorkstation)to624defineROIsandmeasureSUVs.625
3.4.3RequiredCharacteristicsofResultingData(UPICTSection9.3)626
ThespecifictrialprotocolshallprospectivelydefinetheSUVparameterthatisrequiredforeachlesion,or627normal tissue, which will be used for the imaging endpoint. Some studies may also compare different628metrics and will require recording multiple parameters. SUV measures (and the analysis tools used to629obtainthem,includingsoftwareversion)shallbespecifiedforeachprotocolandshallbeusedconsistently630acrossallsubjectsandacrossallsequentiallesionmeasurements.631
SUV’sareintendedasameasureofrelativeuptakeandinthatsense,canberegardedasdimensionless632(unitless);however,usingstrictinterpretationoftheunitsforthecommoncalculationofbodyweight633normalization,thisyieldsunitsofg/ml.Undertheassumptionthatonaverage1mloftissueweighs1gm634(e.g.,water),adimensionlessSUVwouldbeobtained.Displaysystemmanufacturestypically,butnot635always,indicateunitsofg/mlifimagesarescaledtoSUVswithabodyweightnormalization.Thisis636presumablytodifferentiatebetweenbodyweight(orlean-body-mass)andbody-surface-area637normalizations,whichwouldshowdifferentunits(andvalues).Basedonthelackofconsensusandthat638manydisplaysystemsalreadyuseunits,therecommendationbelowistouseunitsofg/ml.639640Itshouldbeclearwhichvaluesbelongtowhichlesion.ThiscanbedonebycapturingDICOMcoordinates641alongwiththeSUVorsecondaryscreencapturesoftheROIforidentification.Itshouldbereportedwhich642SUVmeasureisused,i.e.statisticandtypeofnormalization.643
Ifareferencetissue(e.g.liver)SUVismeasured,then,thatSUVshouldbereportedalongwithlesionSUV644data.645
Theanalysissoftwareshouldgenerateareport.646
3.5.ImageInterpretationandReporting(UPICTSection10)647
NoQIBAProfilespecificationcanbeprovidedforimageinterpretationatthistime.ImageInterpretationis648consideredtobebeyondthescopeofthisdocument.RefertoFDG-PET/CTUPICTProtocol(Section10).In649addition, further interpretationof thequantitative results (e.g.PERCIST [Wahl2009])and/ornormalizing650
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:25
SUV to reference tissue values (e.g. liver or blood pool) can also be specified as part of a specific trial651protocol.652
Typicallythetrialprotocolwillstatehowquantitativeresponseismeasured.Forexample,responsecanbe653basedonthehottest lesion,butsometimesthechangeof thesumofSUVs isused. Inotherwords,how654quantitativeresponseismeasureshouldbespecifiedaprioribythetrial itself.Thisalsoappliestotarget655lesionselection.656
657
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
ImageReporting
ImagingFacility ImagingreportsshallbepopulatedfromDICOMheaderinformationusingstructuredreporting.
658
3.6.QualityControl659
ThefollowingsectiondealswithmultipleaspectsofqualitycontrolinFDG-PET/CTstudies.(SeeFDG-PET/CT660UPICT Protocol Section 12 for additional information). This includes selecting and qualifying a PET/CT661imaging facility, imagingpersonnelandPET/CT scannersandancillaryequipment. Inaddition, theuseof662phantomimaging(priortostudyinitiationandongoing)isdiscussedaswellasidentifyingsubjectswhose663data may need to be censored due to lack of data integrity. Finally, post-image-acquisition quality664assessmentisdetailed.665
3.6.1ImagingFacility666
It is essential to implement quality processes that ensure reliable performance of the scanner and667consistentimageacquisitionmethodology.Theseprocessesmustbeinplacepriortosubjectimagingand668be followed for the duration of the trial. A facility “imaging capability assessment” is a prerequisite to669facility selection for participation in any clinical trial involving the use of FDG-PET/CT as an imaging670biomarker.Thisimagingcapabilityassessmentwillinclude:671
• Identificationofappropriateimagingequipmentintendedforuseinthetrial672
• Documented performance of required quality control procedures of the scanner and ancillary673equipment(e.g.dosecalibrator,glucosemeter,etc.)674
• Radiotracerqualitycontrolprocedures675
• Experienceofkeypersonnel(technologists,radiologists,physicistsand/orotherimagingexperts)676
• Procedurestoensureimagingprotocolconformanceduringthetrial677
3.6.1.1 SiteAccreditation/QualificationMaintenance678
Whilst imaging facility accreditation is generally considered to be adequate for routine clinical practice679purposes (e.g., ACR, IAC, and TJC), facility qualification (e.g., SNM-CTN,ACRIN, and imaging core labs) is680requiredforclinicalresearch/clinicaltrialparticipation.Inordertobeconsideredtobecompliantwiththis681Profile, an imaging scanner/facilitymust provide documentation of current qualified status. Appropriate682forms,checklistsorotherprocessdocumentsshouldbemaintainedandpresenteduponrequesttoverify683
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:26
that ongoing quality control procedures are being performed in a timelymanner as dictated by specific684clinical study requirements. If exceptions to any of the performance standards stated below occur and685cannotberemediatedonsite,thesiteshouldpromptlycommunicatetheissuetotheappropriateinternal686overseerforadviceastohowtheirregularityshouldbemanaged.Inadditiontodocumentingthelevelof687performance required for this Profile (and the level of performance achieved), the frequency of facility688accreditation/qualificationalsoneedstobedescribed.689
ItisimportanttonotethatthatimagingfacilityAccreditationand/orQualification,asdefinedinthisProfile,690areconsiderednecessary,butarenotsufficient forconformancewith thisProfile.Forconformancewith691theProfile,andthustosupporttheclaimsoftheProfile,allnormativerequirementsmustbemet.692
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Accreditation/Qualification
ImagingSite&ImageAcquisitionDevice
ShallmaintainanddocumentAccreditedstatusforclinicalpractice(ACR,IAC,TJC,etc.)orQualifiedstatusforclinicaltrials(e.g.ACRIN,SNM-CTN,CALGB,CROs,etc.).
3.6.2ImagingFacilityPersonnel693
Foreachof thepersonnelcategoriesdescribedbelow,thereshouldbetraining,credentialing,continuing694education and peer review standards defined. Guidelines for training/credentialing for each resource695categoryaresummarizedbelow(UPICTProtocolSection2.1).696
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PersonnelRoster
ImagingFacilityCoordinator
Eachsiteshall,atthetimeoftrialactivationandpriortosubjectaccrual,havethesupportofcertifiedtechnologists,physicists,andphysicians(asdefinedbelow),experiencedintheuseofFDG-PET/CTintheconductofoncologicalclinicaltrials.
Technologist ImagingFacilityCoordinator
TechnologistcertificationshallbeequivalenttotherecommendationspublishedbytherepresentativesfromtheSocietyofNuclearMedicineTechnologistsSection(SNMTS)andtheAmericanSocietyofRadiologicTechnologists(ASRT)andshouldalsomeetalllocal,regional,andnationalregulatoryrequirementsfortheadministrationofionizingradiationtopatients.
MedicalPhysicist
ImagingFacilityCoordinator
MedicalphysicistsshallbecertifiedinMedicalNuclearPhysicsorRadiologicalPhysicsbytheAmericanBoardofRadiology(ABR);inNuclearMedicinePhysicsbytheAmericanBoardofScienceinNuclearMedicine(ABSNM);inNuclearMedicinePhysicsbytheCanadianCollegeofPhysicistsinMedicine;orequivalentcertificationinothercountries;orhave3yearsofPETexperience.Regardlessofcertification,thephysicistshouldhavespecificexperienceinPETanditsquantitativeuse.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:27
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Physician ImagingFacilityCoordinator
PhysiciansoverseeingandinterpretingPET/CTscansshallbequalifiedbytheABR(Diagnosticand/orNuclearRadiology)orAmericanBoardofNuclearMedicine(ABNM)orequivalentwithintheUnitedStatesoranequivalententityappropriateforthegeographiclocationinwhichtheimagingstudy(ies)willbeperformedand/orinterpreted.
697
3.6.3FDG-PET/CTAcquisitionScanner698
FDG-PET/CTstudiesasdescribedinthisProfilerequireadedicatedPET/CTscanner.PET/CTscannersshould699be identifiedbasedonmanufacturer, nameandmodel.Hardware specifications shouldbedocumented.700Scannersoftwarenameandversionshouldbedocumentedatthetimeoftrialinitiationandatthetimeof701anyandallupdatesorupgrades.702
The PET/CT scanner must undergo routine quality assurance and quality control processes (including703preventivemaintenanceschedules)appropriateforclinicalPET/CTapplications,asdefinedbyprofessional704and/or regulatory agencies. In order to assure adequate quantitative accuracy and precision of PET/CT705imagingresults,additionalqualityassurancemeasuresarerequired,asdiscussedbelow.706
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PhysicalInspection
Technologist Shall,onadailybasis,checkgantrycoversintunnelandsubjecthandlingsystem.
QA/QCChecks Technologist AllQA/QCproceduresrecommendedbythemanufacturershallbeperformedatthefrequencyrecommendedbythemanufactureranddocumented.AtableofQA/QCproceduresforasubsetofspecificPET/CTscannersfromeachvendorisincludedinAppendixG.2.
DailyQAproceduresshallbeperformedpriortoanysubjectscan.
3.6.3.1AncillaryEquipment707
3.6.3.1.1DoseCalibrator708
ThefollowingguidelinesarecollectedfromANSIstandardN42.13,2004andIAEATechnicalReportSeries709TRS-454.AllrequirementsassumemeasurementsonunitdosesofFDGandthatcalibrationsourcesarein710the'syringe'geometry(i.e.,nobulkdoses).711
The Constancy test ensures reproducibility of an activity measurement over a long period of time by712measuringalong-livedsourceofknownactivity.713
The Accuracy test ensures that the activity values determined by the dose calibrator are correct and714traceabletonationalorinternationalstandardswithinreporteduncertainties.715
TheLinearitytestconfirmsthat,foranindividualradionuclide,thesamecalibrationsettingcanbeapplied716toobtainthecorrectactivityreadoutovertherangeofuseforthatdosecalibrator.717
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:28
718
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Constancy Technologist Shallbeevaluateddaily(orafteranydosecalibratorevent)usingaNIST-traceable(orequivalent)simulatedF-18,Cs-137,orCo-57dosecalibratorstandardandconfirmedthatnetmeasuredactivityontheF-18settingdiffersbynogreaterthan±2.5%fromdaytoday.
Accuracy
Technologist Shallbeevaluatedmonthly(orafteranydosecalibratorevent)withaNIST-traceable(orequivalent)Cs-137,Co-57,orsimulatedF-18dosecalibratorstandard.Shallconfirmthatnetmeasuredactivitiesdiffernogreaterthan±2.5%fromexpectedvalue.
ThescannercalibrationshallbetestedusingaNIST-traceable(orequivalent)simulatedF-18sourceobject,e.g.auniformcylinder,largeenoughtoavoidpartialvolumeeffectsorotherresolutionlosses.
Shallbeevaluatedmonthly(orafteranydosecalibratorevent)withaNIST-traceable(orequivalent)simulatedF-18dosecalibratorstandard.Shallconfirmthatnetmeasuredactivitiesdiffernogreaterthan±2.5%fromexpectedvalue.
Linearity TechnologistorRadiationsafetyofficerorQualifiedMedicalPhysicist
Shallbeevaluatedatleastannually(orafteranydosecalibratorevent)andshouldbewithin±2.5%ofthetruevalueoveranoperatingrangeof37-1110MBq(1to30mCi).
PETRadiationDose
DoseCalibrator ShallrecordtheradiationdosefromtheadministeredactivityandaccompanyinginformationinaDICOMRadiopharmaceuticalAdministrationRadiationDoseStructuredReport.
719
3.6.3.1.2Scalesandstadiometers720
Scalesandstadiometersshouldbeinspectedandcalibratedatinstallationandannually.721
722
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Scalesandstadiometers
Approvedpersonnel
Shallbeevaluatedannuallyorafteranyrepairbyqualifiedpersonnel.
Shallbeconfirmedthaterrorislessthan+/-2.5%fromexpectedvaluesusingNIST-traceableorequivalentstandards.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:29
3.6.3.1.3Bloodglucoselevelmeasurementdevice723
GlucosemeasurementsshouldbemadeusingaCLIA-approved,CLIA-cleared,orequivalent(outsidetheUS)724glucosemeasurementtechnique.725
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Bloodglucoselevelmeasurementdevice
Approvedpersonnel
ShallhaveQA/QCtestingandcalibrationperformedusingaCLIA-approved,CLIA-cleared,orequivalent(outsideUS)procedure.
726
3.6.3.1.4Clocksandtimingdevices727
PET/CT scanner computer and all clocks in an imaging facility used to record activity/injection728measurementsshouldbesynchronizedtostandardtimereferencewithin+/-1minute.These includeany729clocksor timekeeping systems thatareconnectedwitha subject’sFDG-PET/CTstudy, inparticular those730associatedwiththedosecalibrator,theinjectionroom,thescanner,andtheacquisitioncomputer(s).The731synchronizationofall clocks (todate, timeofdayand to timezone) shouldbemonitoredperiodicallyas732partofongoingQAprogram.Inparticular,clocksshouldbeinspectedimmediatelyafterpoweroutagesor733civilchangesforDaylightSavings(NA)orSummerTime(Eur). Correctsynchronizationcouldbeachieved734usingtheConsistentTimeIntegrationProfileasdefinedintheIHEITInfrastructureTechnicalFramework.735TheConsistentTimeProfilerequirestheuseoftheNetworkTimeProtocol(NTP)(www.NTP.org).736
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Scannerandsiteclocks
Approvedpersonnel
PET/CTscannercomputerandallclocksinanImagingfacilityusedtorecordactivity/injectionmeasurementsshallbesynchronizedtostandardtimereferencewithin+/-1minute.
SynchronizationofallclocksusedintheconductoftheFDG-PET/CTstudyshallbecheckedweeklyandafterpoweroutagesorcivilchangesforDaylightSavings(NA)orSummerTime(Eur)
Scannerandsiteclocks
SpecificDevice ProvidetimesynchronizationaspertheIHEConsistentTimeIntegrationProfile.
Dosecalibratorclock
DoseCalibrator Electronicrecordofoutputfromadosecalibratorshallbesynchronizedwithothertimekeepingdevices.
737
3.6.4PhantomImaging738
Toqualify thePET/CT scanner for clinical practiceor for a clinical trial, a phantom imagingprocedure is739required.Inadditiontocertaingenerallyavailable,commonlyusedphantoms,purpose-specificphantoms740maybeprovidedtosimulatecertaintypesofcancersoranatomiclocationsandthereforemightvaryfrom741trial to trial based on the need to evaluate particular diagnostic, staging and/or treatment response742performanceand/oranatomiclocation.Optionsthatmightbeconsideredonaper-protocolbasisinclude,743butarenotlimitedto:744
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:30
1. eachsiteusesasinglephantomforthedurationofthetrialbutnotnecessarilythesamemodelof745phantomusedatothersites746
2. allsitesusephantomsofthesamemodelforthedurationofthetrial747
3. allsitesusephantomsbuilttoprecisespecificationsforthedurationofthetrial748
4. allsitesshareasinglephantomforthedurationofthetrial.749
The phantom scans and performance evaluation should be performed prior to the start of a trial and750repeated during the course of the trial as specified by the individual protocol. Any changes to scanner751equipment, either hardware or software, should be immediately reported to the trial sponsor and/or752imagingCROandmay result in theneed for re-qualificationprior to imaging additional trial subjects. In753particular,itisstronglyrecommendedthatsubjectsinalongitudinalstudybescannedonthesamePET/CT754systemwiththesamesoftwareversionwheneverpossible.755
Imagenoiselevelsaremeasuredusingananthropomorphicphantom(e.g.NEMA,ACR,SNM,EANM)witha756uniform area to assess image ‘noise’ bymeans of the coefficient of variation (COV), also known as the757relativestandarddeviation(%RSD),whichisexpressedasapercentageandisdefinedasCOV=(SD/Mean)758x100,forthevoxelvalueswithinaspecifiedvolumeofinterest(VOI).Thephantomshouldbefilledsuch759that theactivityconcentration in theuniformarea isapproximately3.7–7.4kBq/ml (0.1 to0.2uCi/ml),760similar totheexpectedaveragenormaltissueconcentrationat thetimeof imaging inanaverageweight761(70-80kg)subjectincombinationwiththeintendedFDGdosage.Thephantomshouldbescannedusingthe762minimaltimeperbedspecifiedinthetrialprotocolorusingtheroutinelyappliedtimeperbedinthelocal763clinicalsetting.Moreover, imagereconstructionmethodsandsettingsshouldequalthosespecifiedinthe764trialprotocolorequalthoseroutinelyappliedinthelocalclinicalsetting.Aregionofinterest(ROI)should765bepositionedentirelywithinthephantom’suniformareaandasmuchaspossiblecentrallylocatedwithin766thephantom.TheROIshouldbeacubicalorrectangularvolume,withthelengthofeachsideascloseas767possibleto,butnolessthan,3cm.Aspheremeasuringnolessthan3cm.indiametermayalsobeusedas768theROIonsystemsthathavethecapabilitytoaccommodatethisstrategy.TheCOVofthevoxelvaluesthus769determinedshouldberecordedandshouldbebelow15%.IftheCOVofthevoxelvaluesthusdeterminedis770above15%,theacquisitiontimeshouldbeincreasedaccordingly.771
The normative list below is based on theNEMA ImageQuality, ACR, and uniform cylinder phantoms as772appropriate.773
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Phantomtests:Frequency
ImagingSite Shallperformanddocumentresultsofthefollowingtestsnolessthanquarterly.
Phantomtests:crosscalibrationwithdosecalibrator
ImagingSite Shallperformquarterlyandafterscannerupgrades,maintenanceorrepairs,newsetupsandmodificationstothedosecalibrator.
Phantomtests:SUVmeasurements
ImagingSite UsingACRoruniformcylinderphantomorequivalentshallobtainanSUVforalargecentralROIof1.0withanacceptablerangeof0.9to1.1.
UsingACRoruniformcylinderphantomorequivalentshallobtainanSUVforalargecentralROIof1.0withanacceptablerangeof
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:31
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
0.95to1.05.
Phantomtests:axialuniformitymeasurements
ImagingSite Usinguniformcylinderphantomorequivalentshallobtainaslice-to-slicevariabilityoflessthan10%forthesliceswithinthecentral80%oftheaxialFOV
Usinguniformcylinderphantomorequivalentshallobtainaslice-to-slicevariabilityoflessthan5%forthesliceswithinthecentral80%oftheaxialFOV
Phantomtests:resolutionmeasurements
ImagingSite Shallperformandsuccessfullyobtainphantomimagingresultsforcoldandhotobjectimagingasdescribed.Forcoldobjectimaging,thetestphantomwillbetheACRPETphantomortheDeluxeJasczakphantom(orequivalent)withsixsetsofacrylicrodsarrangedinapie-shapedpatternwiththefollowingdiameters:4.8,6.4,7.9,9.5,11.1,and12.7mm.The9.5,11.1,and12.7mmdiameterrodsmustbevisible;ifnecessaryupto1cmsliceaveragingcanbeused.Forhotobjectresolution,thefillable12mmdiameter‘hot’cylinderfortheACRphantommustbevisible;forCTNphantom,allhotobjectsgreaterthan10mmmustbevisibleandforNEMAphantom,13mmspheremustbevisible.AlsoseeSection3.6.4.2."
Harmonizedimagereconstructionprotocolsareavailable.(i.e.,knownrecoverycoefficientsversussizeforagiventestobjectsuchasthemodifiedNEMANU-2ImageQualityphantom
Phantomtests:noisemeasurements
ImagingSite ThephantomshallbefilledwithanFDGconcentrationofactivityconcentrationintheuniformareais(approximately0.1to0.2µC/ml)andscannedusingtheintendedacquisitionprotocol.Usingarectangularorsphericalregionascloseaspossibleto,butnosmallerthan,3cmtoaside,theCOVofthevoxelvalueswithintheregionshouldbebelow15%,forthesliceswithinthecentral80%oftheaxialFOV.
774
3.6.4.1UniformityandCalibration775
Verificationofscannernormalizationwithauniformphantomisaminimumrequirementforallscanners776used inclinical trials includingthosethatonlyhavequalitativeendpoints.FortrialswithquantitativePET777measurements, this assessment should also include a comparison against a dose calibrator to ensure778quantitativeaccuracy;thatis,acomparisonoftheabsoluteactivitymeasuredversusthemeasuredamount779injected should be performed. This comparison is particularly important after software or hardware780upgrades.Ifthetrialrequiresabsolutequantificationinbaselineimagesorabsolutechangesinlongitudinal781studies,itshouldbeconsideredtoincludeanimagequalityand/orcontrastrecoveryQCassessmentaspart782
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:32
of the routineQC procedures and/or scanner validation process, see Appendix E of theUPICT Protocol.783Clinical trials using only relative changes in longitudinal studies may not require contrast recovery784assessmentsprovidedthere isappropriateconsiderationfortheminimumsizeoftarget lesionsbasedon785thepartialvolumeeffect.786
Anessential requirement forextractingquantitativedata from images is that therebeknowncalibration787accuracy and precision and/or cross calibration of the PET/CT system against the (locally) used dose788calibrator (within 10%). The QC procedures should utilize the same acquisition/reconstruction protocol,789softwareandsettingsthatareusedforthesubjectscans.790
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
UniformityQC TechnologistorPhysicist
Atleastquarterlyandfollowingsoftwareupgrades,shallassesstransverseandaxialuniformityacrossthecentral80%ofimageplanesbyimagingauniformcylinderphantom.
1. Thestandarddeviationofalargecentral2DROIshallbecomparedwithsimilarpreviousscanstocheckformeasurabledifferences.
2. Themeanvaluesofalargecentral2DROIfortheseimageslicesshallbecomparedwithsimilarpreviousscanstocheckformeasurabledifferences.
CrossCalibration Technologistorphysicist
Atleastquarterlyandfollowingsoftwareupgradesorchangestothedosecalibrator,shallperformcheckstomonitorandidentifydiscrepanciesbetweenthePETscanneranddosecalibrator.
791
3.6.4.2Resolution(UPICTSection12.1.1.11)792
Theassessmentofadequateresolutionshouldincludebothaqualitativeevaluation(usingclinicalimages)793and quantitative assessment (using phantom-defined criteria). The phantom-defined requirements are794morecompletelydescribedinUPICTprotocolSection12.1.1.11.795
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Resolution NuclearMedicinePhysician
Shallperform,onatleastanannualbasis,anddocumentaqualitativeresolutionQCtestbyusingtheroutineimageprocessingprotocolsanddemonstratingresolutionofnormalgrossanatomicfeatureswithinclinicalimagesofthebrain,heartandabdomen.
Resolution MedicalPhysicist Shallperform(onatleastanannualbasis)anddocumentperformanceofaquantitativeassessment(usingaphantomwithdifferingsizedefinedtargetssuchastheACRorNEMAIQphantomsprocessedwithroutineimagereconstructionprotocols)forlesionresolution.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:33
3.6.4.3Noise(UPICTSection12.1.1.12)796
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Noise MedicalPhysicist Shallperformqualitativeorquantitativeassessmentofimagenoiseinphantomimagestobeofconsistentandacceptablequality.
797
3.6.4.4Phantomimagingdataanalysis798
ForPETimageanalysis,therearemanycombinationsofhardwareandsoftwarethatareused.Thesoftware799alonecomprisesmultiplelayersincludingtheoperatingsystem,severalbasemodulesforinputanddisplay,800and the components that draw/calculate ROIs and calculate SUVs. It has been demonstrated that even801changes intheunderlyingoperatingsystemcanproducechanges inthequantitativeoutputproducedby802the display and analysis system [Gronenschild 2012]. Surprisingly little effort (outside manufacturer's803internal processes) has been applied to testing or validating the quantitative accuracy of SUV804measurementsproducedbydisplayandanalysismethods.805
Toprovideamethod for testingandvalidatingquantitativeaccuracyofSUVmeasurementsproducedby806the display and analysis methods, the QIBA FDG-PET/CT Biomarker Committee has developed an FDG-807PET/CTdigitalreferenceobject(DRO),whichisasynthetictestobjectcomprisedofstackedDICOMimages808representinganFDG-PETimagevolumeandanalignedCTimagevolume.ThePETandCTimagesarebased809on theNEMA/MITANU-2 ImageQualityphantom.TheDROhaspre-determined testobjects toevaluate810ROIfunctionalityandpre-determinedDICOMheaderinformationtotestSUVcalculations.SincetheDROis811created synthetically, any image display software is expected to reproduce the known values exactly,812except for the insignificant machine precision errors. Further details are given in Appendix F.813Recommendedversionsofvendor-neutralpseudo-codesforSUVcalculationaregiveninAppendixG.All814softwareusedforimageanalysisshouldbeverifiedbytheproceduresin4.4.3.815
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
ImageAnalysisSoftware
Imagingsite. All software used for image analysis shall be verified by theproceduresin4.4.3.
3.6.5QualityControlofFDG-PET/CTstudies816
3.6.5.1 DataIntegrity817
The integrity of DICOM image headers should be reviewed and confirmed for DICOM standard818conformance,regulatoryconformance(includingprivacyprotection,suchasmayberequiredbysuchrules819astheHIPAAPrivacyRuleifapplicable),protocolconformance,sufficiencyfortheintendedanalysis(e.g.,to820computeSUV)andconsistencywithsourcedatasuchasCRFs. Insomecases, internalreferencessuchas821thelivercanbeusedforqualitycontroltoconfirmacceptablerangesofSUVs.822
3.6.5.2 DeterminationofImageQuality823
CT images should be reviewed by the Image Analyst for assessment of image quality and for potential824artifacts suchasbeamhardening,metalobjects,andmotion.PET images shouldbecompared to theCT825imagesforproperimageregistrationandpotentialattenuationcorrectionartifacts.Bothuncorrectedand826attenuationcorrectedimagesmayneedtobeassessedtoidentifyanyartifactscausedbycontrastagents,827
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:34
metalimplantsand/orsubjectmotion.Forexample,movementormis-registrationcanleadtopoorquality828quantitative data and invalid numbers. Some imagesmay be too poor in quality to quantify. Statistical829quality of images is important to report, but not a full substitute for quality. Liver noise assessment as830definedperPERCIST[Wahl2009]isconsideredareasonablestart.831
3.6.5.3 DeterminationofEvaluableTumorLesions832
Thedefinitionofspecific tumorsthatareevaluableshouldbeaddressedprospectively intheclinical trial833protocol. Protocol-specific guidelines should document whether or not minimum size criteria and/or834minimumbaselineSUVcriteriafortargetlesionqualificationsareused,andifso,howsuchcriteriawillbe835used.836
Thecriteriabelowrepresentthebestknownpracticesbasedonpublisheddata,andcanprovideaguideline837fordeterminingevaluability.838
SelectionofTargetLesions(UPICTSection10.2.1.1)839
The lesion tobemeasured shouldbe freeof artifacts, forexample, fromnearby intenseFDGcontaining840structures(likethebladder)orduetomotionorattenuationcorrectionartifacts.841
MinimumBaselineSUV(UPICTSection10.2.1.1.1)842
FromtheSNMGlobalHarmonizationSummit (2010)and in themeta-analysisbydeLangenetal (2012),843therewasconsensusthattoreliablymeasureachangeintheFDGuptakeofalesion,ahighbaselineFDG844uptakeisnecessary.Forillustration,a30%decreaseinlesionuptakemaybemorereliablymeasured,and845potentiallymoremeaningful, if the initial lesionuptakehadanSUVof5g/mlasopposedtoanSUVof2846g/ml.847
UPICT Acceptable level: Aminimum FDG-avidity is required and should be specified in the clinical trial848protocol. Thiscanbedeterminedbyeitherasubject-specific thresholdasproposedwithPERCIST [Wahl8492009]orasageneralcutoff.Forageneralcutoff,aSUVmaxof4issuggestedforalltargetlesions,although850insomesettingsalowerminimumSUVmaxmaybeacceptable,suchasinthelungorbreast.Alternative851methodshavebeenproposed[LodgeandWahl2013].852
ThemeasurementformeanliverSUVismadeusinga3-cmdiametersphericalROIplacedintherightlobe853of the liver at the level ofmain portal vein and equidistant between the porta hepatis and lateral liver854margin.CareshouldbetakentoavoidplacingtheROIclosetotheedgeoftheliver[Subramaniam2012].855FurtherdetailsaregiveninUPICTSection10.2.1.1.1.Iftheliverisnotinthefieldofvieworisabnormaltoa856degreethatnormallivercannotbeassessed,thenthealternatecomparatoristouseaminimumthreshold857levelof2.0xmeanSUVofbloodpool ina3DROIdefinedasa1cmdiametercylinder inthedescending858thoracicaortaextendingover2cm,trackingthelongaxisoftheaorticlumen,avoidingthewalloftheaorta859orareasofplaqueorcalcification.IfthedescendingaortaisnotevaluableaVOIofthesamevolumeshould860bemeasuredfromelsewhereinthethoracicaorta.861
MinimumLesionSize862
TheSNMGlobalHarmonizationSummitsuggeststhattumorsshouldtypicallybeover2cmindiameterfor863target lesion inclusionatbaseline.Lesionssmallerthan2cm(orotherwisenoteasilymeasurable)witha864highenoughFDGuptake,maystillbeevaluable.865
Evaluation of lesion size (e.g., longest diameter) may be difficult. This may be due to intrinsic lesion866characteristics (e.g., infiltrative or CT lesion isodensity to surrounding tissue) or due to the anatomic867locationoftumor(e.g.,bonemarrowsite).LesionssubjecttopartialvolumeeffectofSUVmeasurement,868
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:35
notably due to anatomic location and attenuation correction errors (e.g., peri-diaghragmatic lesions at869eitherlungbaseorhepaticdome)potentiallyshouldbeexcluded.870
3.6.5.4 DeterminationofsubjectsunsuitableforFDG-PET/CTanalysis871
ReferenceSection3.1.1"SubjectSelection,Timing,andBloodGlucoseLevels"872
3.6.6QualityControlofInterpretation873
Topromotequantifiableperformancestandardsforthequalitycontrolofinterpretationthereisaneedfor874intra-readervariabilitystudies.Ina2-Readerparadigm,theninter-readervariabilityisneededaswell.Itis875currently unclearwhat statistics to evaluate and how these performancemetrics should be used in the876analysis.877
4.Conformance878
RelationofthisProfiletoExpectationsforQIBAProfileCompliance879
Definitions(fromAppendixC):880
Qualified: The imaging site is formally approved by an appropriate body (i.e. ACRIN, CQIE, SNMMI-CTN,881EANM-EARL,NCRI,animaginglaboratoryorCRO)foraspecificclinicalresearchstudy.882
Accredited:Approvalbyanindependentbodyorgroupforbroadclinicalusage(requiresongoingQA/QC)883e.g.ACR,IAC,TJC.884
Compliant: The imaging site and equipment meet all the requirements described herein, which are885necessarytomeettheQIBAProfileclaim.886
Therequirementsincludedhereareintendedtoestablishabaselinelevelofcapabilities.Providinghigher887levels of performance or advanced capabilities is both allowed and encouraged. Furthermore the QIBA888Profile is not intended to limit equipment suppliers in any way with respect to how they meet these889requirements.InstitutionsmeetingthestatedcriteriaareconsideredtobeQIBACompliant.890
4.1.ImageAcquisitionSite891
Typicallyclinicalsitesareselectedduetotheircompetence inoncologyandaccess toasufficiently large892subjectpopulationunderconsideration.Forimagingitisimportanttohaveavailabilityof:893
• Appropriateimagingequipmentandqualitycontrolprocesses,894
• Appropriateancillaryequipmentandaccesstoradiotracerandcontrastmaterial,895
• ExperiencedTechnologists(CTandPETtrained)forthesubjecthandlingandimagingprocedure,896
• Appropriately trained Radiologists/Nuclear Medicine Physicians for image analysis and diagnostic897interpretation,898
• Appropriatelytrainedimageanalysts,withoversightbyaRadiologistorNuclearMedicinePhysician,899
• MedicalPhysicssupporttoensureappropriatescannerandequipmentcalibration,900
• ProcessesthatassureimagingQIBAProfile-compliantimagegenerationinappropriatetimewindow901
AQA/QCprogramforPET/CTscannersandancillarydevicesmustbeinplacetoachievethegoalsofthe902clinicaltrial.Theminimumrequirementsarespecifiedabove.Thisprogramshallinclude(a)elementsto903
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:36
verifythatimagingfacilitiesareperformingimagingstudiescorrectlyand(b)elementstoverifythat904facility'sPET/CTscannersareperformingwithinspecifiedcalibrationvalues.Thesemayinvolve905additionalPETandCTphantomtestingthataddressissuesrelatingtobothradiationdoseandimage906quality(whichmayincludeissuesrelatingtowatercalibration,uniformity,noise,spatialresolution–in907theaxialplane-,reconstructedslicethicknessz-axisresolution,contrastscale,andothers)and908constancy.Thereisagreementthatsomeperformancetesting(e.g.,constancyphantom)addsvalue;909however,acceptableperformancelevels,frequencyofperformance,triggersforactionandmitigation910strategiesneedfurtherdefinitionbeforethesecanberequired.Thisphantomtestingmaybedonein911additiontotheQAprogramdefinedbythedevicemanufacturerasitevaluatesperformancethatis912specifictothegoalsoftheclinicaltrial.913
914
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PET/CTScanner
AcquisitionFacility
ThisProfileshallonlyaddressfullringPET/CTscanners.
CTScannerCalibration
Technologist Shallperformdailywaterequivalentphantomanalysis;ensurethatoutputisacceptableandmanuallyenteronform/electronicdatabase.
PETScannerCalibration
Technologist Shallperformdaily/weekly/monthlyscannerQAasrecommendedbymanufacturer;ensurethatoutputvaluesareacceptableandmanuallyenteronform/electronicdatabase
PETScannerCalibrationConstancyCheck
Technologist Shallperformconstancyphantom(e.g.,Ge-68cylinder)scan(preferablyNISTtraceableorequivalenttogatherinformationregardinguniformityaswell)atleastweeklyandaftereachcalibration.
Dosecalibrator
ImagingsiteorManufacturer
CalibratedtoF-18usingNISTtraceablesourceorequivalenteitherbysiteorcalibratormanufacturer.
915
4.2.PET/CTAcquisitionDevice916
DistinctfromtheperformancespecificationsandfrequencyoftestingdescribedinSection4.1whichapply917to quality control of the Acquisition Device at the imaging facility, this Section defines performance918specificationsof theAcquisitionDevicetobemetupon leavingthemanufacturing facility. Inorder tobe919compliantwiththisProfile,theAcquisitionDeviceshouldbeheldtothesamestandardwhetheramobile920utility or a fixed installation; a mobile scanner may require additional calibration to achieve this921performance.922
ThePET/CTscannershoulduseDICOMattributestofollowversionnumbersofsoftwarefor:1Acquisition,9232Reconstruction,3Post-processing,4DisplayandROIanalysis,5DynamicAnalysis.NotethatthisProfile924does not specify dynamic imaging performance requirements. Performance requirements regarding925softwareversionidentification,documentationandtrackingacrosstimearedescribedinSection4.5.926
ThePET scanacquisition start time shouldbeused for thedecay reference timeand the integralmodel927should be used for decay correction. The scanner should perform all decay corrections (i.e. not the928
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:37
operator).ImagedataaretobegiveninunitsBq/ml.“Derived”images(distinctfrom“Original”)shouldbe929flaggedfollowingtheDICOMstandardandshouldretainthescanacquisitiondateandtimefields.930
All needed information for fully corrected administered activity (e.g. residual activity, injection time,931calibrationtime)isrequired.Notethatuseofthetermadministeredactivitybelowreferstofullycorrected932netradioactivity.933
Baseline level (i.e. equivalent to the UPICT protocol level of 'Acceptable') compliance requires that the934DICOMimagesetfromthesubject’sPET/CTscanandnecessarymetadata(thatisnotcurrentlycapturedby935all PET scanner acquisition processes) is captured in trial documentation, e.g. case report forms. The936metadata isrequiredtoperformthequantitativeanalysisandperformqualitycontrolonSUVcovariates.937Thisincludesforexample,post-injectionresidualactivityandsubjectheight.Thisdatashouldbecaptured938inthe'CommonDataFormatMechanism'asdescribedinAppendixE.939
The DICOM format used by the PET/CT scanner should meet the Conformance Statement written by940manufacturerofthePET/CTsystem.PETdatashallbeencodedintheDICOMPETorEnhancedPETImage941StorageSOPClass,andinactivity-concentrationunits(Bq/ml)withadditionalparametersinpublicDICOM942fieldstocalculateSUVs(e.g.height,weight,scalefactors).CTdatashouldbeencodedinCTorEnhancedCT943ImageStorageSOPClass.DICOMdatashallbetransferredusingtheDICOMPart8networkprotocoloras944offlineDICOMPart10filesformediastorageincludingCDsandDVDs.Theyshallbetransferredwithoutany945formoflossycompression.946
Themeta-information is the information that is separate,or inaddition to, the imagevalues (inunitsof947Bq/ml) that is deemed necessary for quantitatively accurate representation of PET SUVs. The meta-948informationmayalsoincludeotherinformationbeyondthatneedforcalculationofSUVs,i.e.thetypeand949or sequencing of therapy, the blood glucose levels, the scanner SUV stability history, etc. The actual950mechanism of capturing the information is not specified in this Profile. The intent here is to list what951informationshouldbecapturedrather than themechanism itself.Themechanismcan range frompaper952notes,toscannedformsorelectronicdatarecords,todirectentryfromthemeasurementequipmentinto953pre-specifiedDICOMfields(i.e.fromthePET/CTscannerorauxiliarymeasurementdevicessuchasthedose954calibrator).Ideallyallofthespecifiedmeta-datawillbecapturedbydirectelectronicentrytoDICOMfields,955aftersuitablemodificationoftheDICOMformatforPETimaging.956
Insomefacilityworkflows,theAcquisitionDevicemayalsoprovideworkstation/analysistoolfunctionality.957Forexample,thedisplayofanSUVstatistic(consideredinSection4.4.1)ordisplayofTracerUptakeTime958(consideredinSection4.4),mayalsoapplytotheAcquisitionDevice,ifusedinthismanner.959
Theconceptendorsedhereisthattheneededmeta-dataisidentified.ThroughrevisionsofthisProfile,the960DICOMstandard,and technology themeta-data is inserted into theanalysis stream (Figure3) inamore961directmannerandtechnologyandacceptedstandardsevolve.962
963
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
CTcalibrationtracking
AcquisitionDevice
DailywaterequivalentphantomvaluesshallbetrackedintheDICOMheader.
PETcalibrationfactor
AcquisitionDevice
ThecurrentSUVcalibrationfactorshallbeincludedintheDICOMheader.
PETQAstatus Acquisition Date/timeandstatusofsystem-wideQAchecksshouldbe
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:38
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Device capturedseparately.
Dosecalibratorcalibration
AcquisitionDevice
CalibrationfactorforanF-18NIST-traceable(orequivalent)sourcewithidentifyinginformationshallbetrackedintheDICOMheaderwithDate/Time.
PETScannercalibration
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletobecalibratedaccordingtothefollowingspecifications:UsingauniformcylindercontainingF-18inwater(ideallythesameusedfordosecalibratorcross-calibration)
Slice-to-slicevariabilityshallbenomorethan±5%(notincludingendslices,asperACRPETCoreLab).
In-planeuniformityforabovephantomshallbelessthan5%.
Immediatelyaftercalibration,usingthesamefilledphantomandscannedsufficientlylongtominimizestatisticalnoise,andanACR-typeROIanalysis
TheaveragemeasuredSUVshallbeintherangeof0.98to1.02.(NotethisisnottheperformanceexpectedduringclinicalimagingoperationasdiscussedinpreambletothisSection).Thistechniqueremovesthevariabilityduetoradionclidemeasurement.
Weight AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletorecordpatientweightinlbsorkgassuppliedfromthemodalityworklistoroperatorentryintoscannerinterface.ShallbestoredinPatientWeightfield(0010,1030)intheDICOMimageheader,asperDICOMstandard.
Patientweightshallbespecifiablewith4significantdigits.
Patientweightshallbetransferrabledirectlyfrommeasurementdeviceintoscannerbyelectronic,HIS/RIS,orothermeans,bypassingalloperatorentry,butstillpermittingoperatorcorrection.
Height AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletorecordpatientheightinfeet/inchesorcm/massuppliedfromthemodalityworklistoroperatorentryintoscannerinterface.ShallbestoredinPatientSizefield(0010,1020)intheDICOMimageheader,asperDICOMstandard.
Patientheightshallbespecifiablewith3significantdigits.
Patientheightshallbetransferrabledirectlyfrommeasurementdeviceintoscannerbyelectronic,HIS/RIS,orothermeans,bypassingalloperatorentry,butstillpermittingoperatorcorrection.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:39
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Bloodglucoselevel AcquisitionDevice
ShallbeabletoRecordpatientbloodglucoselevel,inunitsofmg/dl,ormMol/l,timeofmeasurement,assuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedintheDICOMimageheaderintheAcquisitionContextSequenceusingDICOMPS3.16TID3471PETCovariatesAcquisitionContext.
PatientbloodglucoselevelshallbetransferrabledirectlyfrommeasurementdeviceintothescannerusingtheModalityWorklistNM/PETProtocolContextTID15101,bypassingalloperatorentry,butdisplayingittotheoperatorandstillpermittingoperatorcorrection.
AdministeredRadionuclide
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletoentertheradionuclidetype(i.e.F-18)byoperatorentryintothescannerinterfaceandthroughpredefinedprotocolShallberecordedinRadionuclideCodeSequence(0054,0300)intheDICOMimageheader[e.g.(C-111A1,SRT,“18Fluorine”)].
Shallbeabletoaccepttheradionuclidetype(i.e.F-18)directlyfromthemeasurementdevice(dosecalibrator)ormanagementsystem,usingtheSup159RadiopharmaceuticalAdministrationRadiationDoseReportbypassingalloperatorentry,butstillpermittingoperatorcorrection.
Shallbeabletoaccepttheradionuclidetype(i.e.F-18)fromtheDICOMModalityWorklisteitherfromtheNM/PETProtocolContext,ifpresent,orbyderivingiffromtheRequestedProcedureCodeviaalocallyconfigurabletableofvalues.
AdministeredRadiotracer
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletorecordtheradiotracer(i.e.FDG),assuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadionuclideCodeSequencefield(0054,0300)intheDICOMimageheader,e.g.(C-B1031,SRT,“FluorodeoxyglucoseF18”).
AdministeredRadiotracerradioactivity
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletoentertheadministeredradioactivity,inbothMBqandmCi,assuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadionuclideTotalDosefield(0018,1074)intheDICOMimageheaderinBq.
Shallbeabletorecordwithseparateentryfieldsonscannerinterface:
(1) thepre-injectionFDGradioactivity
(2) timeofmeasurementofpre-injectionFDGradioactivity
(3) theresidualactivityafterinjection
(4) timeofmeasurementtheresidualradioactivityafterinjection
Shallautomaticallycalculatetheadministeredradioactivityand
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:40
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
storeintheRadionuclideTotalDosefield(0018,1074)intheDICOMimageheader.
Alternatively,shallbeabletoreceivethisinformationasperDICOMSupplement159.
PatientAdministeredRadiotracerradioactivityinformationshallbetransferreddirectlyfrommeasurementdeviceintoscannerbyelectronic,HIS/RIS,orothermeans,bypassingalloperatorentry,butstillpermittingoperatorcorrection.
AdministeredRadiotracerTime
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletorecordthetimeofthestartofactivityinjectionassuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadiopharmaceuticalStartDateTimefield(0018,1078)(preferred)orRadiopharmaceuticalStartTimefield(0018,1072).
Shallbeabletorecordthetimeofthestartofactivityinjectionassuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadiopharmaceuticalStartDateTimefield(0018,1078).I.e.,notRadiopharmaceuticalStartTimefield(0018,1072).
Shallbeabletorecordthetimeofthestopofactivityinjectionassuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadiopharmaceuticalStopDateTimefield(0018,1079).
DecayCorrectionMethodology
AcquisitionDevice
EncodedvoxelvalueswithRescaleSlopefield(0028,1053)appliedshallbedecaycorrectedbythescannersoftware(nottheoperator)toasinglereferencetime(regardlessofbedposition),whichisthestarttimeofthefirstacquisition,whichshallbeencodedintheSeriesTimefield(0008,0031)fororiginalimages.
CorrectedImagefield(0028,0051)shallincludethevalue“DECY”andDecayCorrectionfield(0054,1102)shallbe“START”,whichmeansthattheimagesaredecaycorrectedtotheearliestAcquisitionTime(0008,0032).
ScanningWorkflow AcquisitionDevice
ShallbeabletosupportProfileProtocol(Section3)PETandCTorder(s)ofacquisition.
Shallbeabletopre-defineandsave(byimagingsite)aProfileacquisitionProtocolforpatientacquisition.
Shallbeabletointerpretpreviously-reconstructedpatientimagestoregenerateacquisitionprotocol.
Shallbeconfigurabletostore(orreceive)acquisitionparametersaspre-definedprotocols(inaproprietaryorstandardformat),toallowre-useofsuchstoredprotocolstomeetmulti-center
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:41
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
specificationsandtoachieverepeatableperformanceacrosstimepointsforthesamesubject.
CTAcquisitionParameters
AcquisitionDevice
Shallrecordallkeyacquisitionparameters(technique)intheCTimageheader,usingstandardDICOMfields.
CTbasedattenuationcorrection
AcquisitionDevice
ShallrecordinformationinPETDICOMimageheaderwhichCTimageswereusedforcorrections(attenuation,scatter,etc.).
PET-CTAlignment AcquisitionDevice
ShallbeabletoalignPETandCTimageswithin±2mminanydirection.
ShallbeabletoalignPETandCTimageswithin±2mminanydirectionwithaloadupto150kgovertheco-scanlength.
ActivityConcentrationintheReconstructedImages
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletostoreandrecord(rescaled)imagedatainunitsofBq/mlanduseavalueofBQMLforUnitsfield(0054,1001).
TracerUptakeTime
AcquisitionDevice
ShallbederivablefromthedifferencebetweentheRadiopharmaceuticalDateTimefield(0018,1078)(preferred)orRadiopharmaceuticalStartTimefield(0018,1072)andtheSeriesTimefield(0008,0031)orearliestAcquisitionTimefield(0008,0032)intheseries(i.e.,thestartofacquisitionatthefirstbedposition),whichshouldbereportedasseriestimefield(0008,0031).
PETVoxelsize AcquisitionDevice
SeeSection4.3(PETVoxelsize)undertheReconstructionSoftwarespecificationrequirements.
CTVoxelsize AcquisitionDevice
ShallbenogreaterthanthereconstructedPETvoxelsize.
Voxelsshallbesquare,althougharenotrequiredtobeisotropicintheZ(head-foot)axis.
NotrequiredtobethesameasthereconstructedPETvoxelsize.
SubjectPositioning AcquisitionDevice
ShallbeabletorecordthesubjectpositioninthePatientOrientationCodeSequencefield(0054,0410)(whetherproneorsupine)andPatientGantryRelationshipCodefieldSequence(0054,0414)(whetherheadorfeetfirst).
ScanningDirection AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletorecordthescanningdirection(craniocaudalv.caudocranial)intoanappropriateDICOMfield.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:42
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
DocumentationofExamSpecification
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletodefinetheextentofanatomiccoveragebasedondistancefromdefinedlandmarksite(e.g.vertex,EAM).(boththelandmarklocation(anatomically)andthedistancescannedfromlandmark)wouldrequireDICOMtags).
Shallbeabletobereportableforfuturescanningsessions.
TheAcquisitionDeviceshallrecordthez-axisFOVwhichrepresentstheactualdistanceofscananatomiccoverage(cms).
DifferentialAcquisitionTime
AcquisitionDevice
Shallbeabletoacquireandrecordnonuniformscantimesdependentuponareasofclinicalconcern.RecordingcanbedonethroughtheuseofActualFrameDuration(0018,1242)andFrameReferenceTime(0054,1300).
DICOMConformance
AcquisitionDevice
AllimagedataandscanparametersshallbetransferableusingappropriateDICOMfieldsaccordingtotheDICOMconformancestatementforthePET/CTscanner.
DICOMDatatransferandstorageformat
PET/CTScannerorDisplayWorkstation
PETimagesshallbeencodedintheDICOMPETorEnhancedPETImageStorageSOPClass,usingactivity-concentrationunits(Bq/ml)withadditionalparametersstoredinpublicDICOMfieldstoenablecalculationofSUVs.
PETimagesshallbetransferredandstoredwithoutanyformoflossycompression.
964
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
DICOMEditing AcquisitionDevice
ShallbeabletoeditallfieldsrelevantforSUVcalculationandbloodglucosebeforeimagedistributionfromscanner.
Shallprovideappropriatewarningsifoverridingofthecurrentvaluesisinitiated.
965
4.3.ReconstructionSoftware966
ReconstructionSoftwareshallpropagatetheinformationcollectedatthepriorSubjectHandlingand967ImagingAcquisitionstagesandextenditwiththoseitemsnotedintheReconstructionsection.968
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Metadata ReconstructionSoftware
ShallbeabletoaccuratelypropagatetheinformationcollectedatthepriorstagesandextenditwiththoseitemsnotedintheReconstructionsection.
Datacanbereconstructedincludingallcorrectionsneededforquantificationaswellaswithoutscatterand969attenuationcorrection.Analyticaloriterativereconstructionmethodsshouldbeapplied.Ifthesystemis970
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:43
capableofprovidingresolutionrecoveryand/ortimeofflight,thenthedecisionto‘turnon’or‘turnoff’971this/thesecapabilitiesshouldbemadeprospectively,asdictatedbythespecificprotocol,andshouldbe972consistentforagivensubjectacrossmultipletimepoints.973
StandardizationofreconstructionsettingsisnecessarytoobtaincomparableresolutionandSUVrecoveries974acrossthesamesubjectandinter-subjectacrosssites.975
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
DataCorrections
ReconstructionSoftware
PETemissiondatamustbeabletobecorrectedforgeometricalresponseanddetectorefficiency,systemdeadtime,randomcoincidences,scatterandattenuation.
ReconstructionMethodology
ReconstructionSoftware
Shallbeabletoprovideimageswithoutresolutionrecovery.
Shallbeabletoindicate,forbothTOFandResolutionrecovery,ifeitherarebeingusedforpurposesofimagereconstruction.
ReconstructionMethodology/Output
ReconstructionSoftware
Shallbeabletoperformreconstructionswithandwithoutattenuationcorrection.
DataReconstruction2D/3DCompatibility
ReconstructionSoftware
Shallbeabletoperformreconstructionofdataacquiredin3Dmodeusingfully3Dimagereconstructionalgorithms.
Shallbeabletoperformreconstructionofdataacquiredin2Dmodeusing2Dimagereconstructionalgorithms.
Quantitativecalibration
Reconstructionsoftware
Shallapplyappropriatequantitativecalibrationfactorssuchthatallimageshaveunitsofactivityconcentration,e.g.kBq/mL.
Multi-beddata Reconstructionsoftware
Shallcombinedatafrommultipleover-lappingbedpositions(includingappropriatedecaycorrections)soastoproduceasinglethreedimensionalimagevolume.
Voxelsize Reconstructionsoftware
Shallallowtheusertodefinetheimagevoxelsizebyadjustingthematrixdimensionsand/ordiameterofthereconstructionfield-of-view.
ShallbeabletoreconstructPETvoxelswithasize4mmorlessinallthreedimensions(asrecordedinVoxelSpacingfield(0028,0030)andcomputedfromthereconstructionintervalbetweenImagePosition(Patient)(0020,0032)valuesofsuccessiveslices).
Pixelsshallbesquare,althoughvoxelsarenotrequiredtobeisotropicinthez(head-foot)axis.
ShallbeabletoreconstructPETvoxelswithasizeof3mmorlessinallthreedimensions(asrecordedinVoxelSpacingfield(0028,0030)
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:44
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
andcomputedfromthereconstructionintervalbetweenImagePosition(Patient)(0020,0032)valuesofsuccessiveslices).
Voxelsshallbeisotropic.
Reconstructionparameters
Reconstructionsoftware
Shallallowtheusertocontrolimagenoiseandspatialresolutionbyadjustingreconstructionparameters,e.g.numberofiterations,post-reconstructionfilters.
ShallbeabletorecordreconstructionparametersusedinimageDICOMheaderusingtheEnhancedPETIOD,developedbyDICOMworkinggroup.
Reconstructionprotocols
Reconstructionsoftware
Shallallowasetofreconstructionparameterstobesavedandautomaticallyapplied(withoutmanualintervention)tofuturestudiesasneeded.
976
4.4.ImageAnalysisWorkstation977
Theimageanalysisworkstationshallhavetheabilitytoreceiveandpropagatethedataoutput(imagingand978metadata)collectedfromtheprioractivities(SubjectHandling,ImageAcquisition,ReconstructionandPost-979Processing).Withtheinputdata,theanalysisworkstation(andsoftwareanalysistools)willbeabletomake980useofcertainattributevaluestoperformcertainmeasurementsandcomputationalanalysis.Theanalysis981workstationandsoftwaremaybecoupledtothePET/CTscannersystemorprovidedbya3rd-partyvendor.982
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Metadata ImageAnalysisWorkstation
ShallbeabletoaccuratelypropagatetheinformationcollectedatthepriorstagesandextenditwiththoseitemsnotedintheImageAnalysisWorkstationsection.
ShallbeabletodisplayallinformationthataffectsSUVseitherdirectlyincalculation(e.g.patientweight,injectedactivity)orindirectly(uptaketime,plasmaglucoseconcentration).
TracerUptakeTime:Display
ImageAnalysisWorkstation
Shallbecapabletodisplayorincludelinktodisplaythenumberofminutesbetweeninjectionandinitiationofimaging(asperderivationguidelinesdescribedinSection4.2).
983
InputforImageAnalysisisconsideredoutputofReconstructionandPostprocessingsoftwareactivity.Ifthe984ImageAnalystaltersinputdata(e.g.zoom)thisisconsideredpartofImageAnalysisactivity.Ifthisoccurs,985theoriginalinputdatawillbemaintainedasaseparatefile,bothtobestored,includingdescriptionof986manipulationinanaudittrailfileorinadedicatedDICOMtagsection(Section3.2).987
988
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Referencetime ImageAnalysis ShalluseeithertheAcquisitionTimefield(0008,0032)or
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:45
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
fordecaycorrection
Workstation RadiopharmaceuticalStartTime(0018,1072),ifnecessary.Ifaseries(derivedornot)isbasedonAcquisitionTimedecaycorrection,theearliestAcquisitionTime(0008,0032)shallbeusedasthereferencetimefordecaycorrection.
989
4.4.1RegionofInterest(ROI)definition990
Thescanner-display-analysissystemshallprovideatoolfortheusertodefineboth2Dand3Dregionsof991interest(ROIs).WhiletheROIcanbedrawnonprocessedimages,theSUVcalculationshouldbeperformed992fromunprocessed(raw)imagedata(SeeSection3.3.2).TheseROIswillthenbeusedcalculateSUVvalues993asdescribedinthenextsection.994
Thespecificationsbelowarefordefinedregionsforthecalculationof(1)averagevaluewithinanROI(i.e.995SUVmean) (2)maximumvaluewithin anROI (i.e. SUVmax) (3) average valuewithin a fixed-sizeROI (i.e.996SUVpeak) (4) average value within a fixed-size ROI (i.e., SUVpeak), but with the location automatically997selectedtomaximizethemeanvalue.ForSUVpeakmeasures, theuseofpartialvoxelvaluestosecurea9981.2cmdiametersphere(or1ccvolume)ROIisappropriateanddesirable.999
1000
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
VoxelInclusionPolicy
AnalysisTool Shalldescribevoxelinclusionmethodologyandweightingpolicyincludingplacementcriteriaandtotalvolume.
Useamethodequivalenttoweightingforpartialvoxels;fullyincludedvoxelsuseweightof1.0.Weightingshouldbeproportionatetovolumesofvoxelsthatarepartlyincluded.
ROISpecifications AnalysisTool ShalldescribecapabilitiesandlimitsofROIspecificationandplacement.
DimensionsandcenterlocationofROI(box,ellipse,orellipsoid)shallbespecifiableto±1mm.
ForSUVpeakmeasures,thelocationwithinatargetsearchregionthatyieldsthehighestmeanvalueofa1ccregionshallbefoundautomaticallyandreproducibly.
ROIDefinitionTools
AnalysisTool ShallprovideatoolanduserstrategytoallowtheplacementofanROItodeterminetheaveragevaluewithintheROI.
ShallprovideatoolanduserstrategytoallowtheplacementofanROItodeterminethevalueandlocationofthevoxelwiththemaximumvaluewithinanROI.
Shallprovideatoolanduserstrategytoallowtheplacementofa1cmdiameterROI(either2Dor3D)todeterminetheaveragevaluewithintheROI.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:46
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Shallprovideatoolanduserstrategytoallowautomaticplacementofa1cmdiameterROI(either2Dor3D)suchthattheaveragevaluewithintheROIismaximized.
Edge/VolumeDetection
AnalysisTool ShallprovidethresholdmethodsfordefininganROIbasedonimagevalues.
Shallclearlyspecifywhichthresholdmethodisusedandrelevantparametersvalues.
ThreeROIdefinitionmethodsshallbeprovided:Fixedvalue,%ofmaximumvoxel,oredgedetection/segmentationmethods.
ROIsaving/retrieve Analysis/Archival Shallhavethecapabilitytolabel,save,recallandeditROIs.
Shallhavethecapabilitytotracktumorinformationacrosslongitudinalscans.Inadditiontolesion(andnormalreferenceregion)identification,thismayincludecrosstimepointmappingoflesionstrackedonthebasisofconsistentanatomicand/orfunctionalactivity.Otherlesioncharacteristics,suchaslesionname(withconsistentanatomiclabeling),lesionlocation,ROI/VOIsize,correspondinganatomic(CT)imageorslicenumber,SUVmetric(s)andassessmentoftumorheterogeneitymayalsobetrackedandcapturedusingstandardDICOMobjects.
ROIDisplayStatistics
AnalysisTool Shall have the capability to output to the screen display theselectedstatisticsoftheROI.Theseinclude,butarenotlimitedto: Area, volume, mean, maximum, minimum, standarddeviation. Units can be selectable as activity concentration[Bq/ml]orSUV[g/ml](SeeSection3.4.3).
Shall have the capability to display results with at least twodecimalplaces.
ShalloutputROIOutputStatisticstoStructuredDataReportingDICOMfiles.
Shallcalculateresultsdirectlyfromtheoriginallyreconstructedvoxels(notfrominterpolatedand/orzoomedimages).
Theworkstationandrepositoryshallbeabletocreate,storeandretrievemarkups(i.e.ROIs)usedforSUV1001measurements inaccordancewithastandarddefinitionforROIsthatprovidesaknownbalancebetween1002precisionandaccuracy.1003
4.4.2CalculationofStandardizedUptakeValue(SUV)1004
TheROIdefinitionandanalysissoftwareisresponsibleforSUVcalculation,e.g.withdecaycorrectiontothe1005appropriate reference time. Moreover, the manufacturer should implement both versions of SUV1006normalizations (body weight or lean body mass). Recommended vendor-neutral pseudo-codes for SUV1007
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:47
calculationaregiveninAppendixG.1008
1009
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
SUVCalculation AnalysisTool ShallhavethecapabilitytocorrectlycalculateSUVsaccordingtothevendor-neutralpseudo-codesforSUVcalculationgiveninAppendixG.
VolumeofDistributionSurrogate
AnalysisTool ShallhavethecapabilitytocalculateSUVsusingasasurrogatefortheVolumeofDistribution:bodyweight,leanbodymass,andbodysurfacearea(BSA).
LeanbodymassshallbecalculatedaccordingtotheformulaofJames[James1976,Hallynck1981]:
Males:LBM=1.10(w)–128(w^2/h^2)
Females:LBM=1.07(w)–148(w^2/h^2)
BodysurfaceareashallbecalculatedaccordingtotheDuBoisformula:BSA(m^2)=(0.007184)((w)^(0.425))((h)^(0.725))
[Vu2002]
Wherew=weightinkgandh=heightincm.
1010
4.4.3ImageAnalysisWorkstationPerformanceSpecifications1011
Thedigitalreferenceobject(DRO),whichisasyntheticPET(andCT)image,shallbeusedinorderto1012evaluateconformancetothelevelofperformanceofanalysisstation/displaystation.Usersshouldusethe1013DRO(aspertheDROuser'sguideinAppendixF)toverifycorrectimplementationofROIplacement,SUV1014calculations,andPETandCTimagealignment.1015
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
PerformanceEvaluation
AnalysisWorkstation
ShallusetheDROtoverifyadequateperformanceasdescribedinAppendixF.
AnalysisAccuracy AnalysisWorkstation
ForeachofthespecifiedROIsintheDRO(AppendixF)thecorrectSUVvaluesshallbereplicatedbytheAnalysisWorkstation.
AlignmentAccuracy
AnalysisWorkstation
ThePETandCTDROobjectshallappearperfectlyalignedinthetransverse,coronal,andsagittalviews.
DICOMConformance
AnalysisWorkstation
ShallbeabletoreadandapplyallmandatoryDICOMPETIODattributes,aswellasanyadditionaloptionalDICOMattributesspecifiedinthisprofile(includingthoseprivateattributesdefinedinAnnexGforSUVcalculation).
4.5.SoftwareVersionTracking1016
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:48
Ideally,thePET/CTscannershouldbeabletobuildalistontheconsoleofthedatesofallsoftwareversions1017(software changes that might impact quantitative accuracy would typically be inclusive of hardware1018change). Furthermore, the scanner software version should be identified and tracked across time, with1019updates and changes in scanner software noted during the course of the trial. At aminimum, Software1020Versions should be manually recorded during the qualification along with the phantom imaging1021performancedataandtherecordshouldbeupdatedforeverysoftware-upgradeoverthedurationofthe1022trial.This includestheflaggingofthe impactonquantificationfornow; inthefuture,recordallsoftware1023versionnumbersinDICOMheader.1024
1025
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
SoftwareVersiontracking
AcquisitionDevice
Shallrecordthesoftwareversion(s)usedforacquisitionandreconstructioninappropriateDICOMfield(s).
Softwareversionback-testingcompatibility
Workstation Shallprovidemechanismtoprovideanalysisoftheimagedatausingupdatedaswellasprior(platform-specific)versionsofanalysissoftware.
1026
References1027
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Technical Report Series No. 454: Quality Assurance for1028RadioactivityMeasurementinNuclearMedicine,IAEA,Vienna(2006).1029
Medicare National Coverage DeterminationsManual Chapter 1, Part 4 (Sections 200 – 310.1) Coverage1030Determinations(Rev.142,02-03-12).1031
http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads//ncd103c1_part4.pdf1032Referenced19April2012.1033
QIBAUPICTProtocol:http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=UPICT.1034
AdamsMC,TurkingtonTG,WilsonJM,WongTZ.Asystematic reviewof the factorsaffectingaccuracyof1035SUVmeasurements.AJRAmJRoentgenol195(2):310-320,2010.PMID:20651185.1036
BeaulieuS,KinahanP,TsengJ,DunnwaldLK,SchubertEK,PhamP,LewellenB,MankoffDA.SUVvarieswith1037time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time1038differences.JNuclMed44(7):1044-1050,2003.PMID:12843218.1039
Bland,JMandDGAltman.“MeasurementErrorProportionalTotheMean.”BMJ313,no.7049(1996):106.1040
BoellaardR.StandardsforPETimageacquisitionandquantitativedataanalysis.JNuclMed50Suppl1:11S-104120S,2009.PMID:19380405.1042
BoellaardR,O’DohertyMJ,WeberWA,MottaghyFM,LonsdaleMN,StroobantsSG,OyenWJ,KotzerkeJ,1043HoekstraOS,PruimJ,MarsdenPK,TatschK,HoekstraCJ,VisserEP,ArendsB,VerzijlbergenFJ,ZijlstraJM,1044ComansEF,LammertsmaAA,PaansAM,WillemsenAT,BeyerT,BockischA,Schaefer-ProkopC,DelbekeD,1045BaumRP,ChitiA, KrauseBJ. FDGPET andPET/CT: EANMprocedure guidelines for tumourPET imaging:1046version1.0.EurJNuclMedMolImaging37(1):181-200,2010.PMID:19915839.1047
BoellaardR.Needforstandardizationof18F-FDGPET/CTfortreatmentresponseassessments.JNuclMed1048
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:49
52Suppl2:93S-100S,2011.PMID:22144561.1049
BucklerAJ,BresolinL,DunnickNR,SullivanDC,AertsHJ,BendriemB,BendtsenC,BoellaardR,BooneJM,1050ColePE,ConklinJJ,DorfmanGS,DouglasPS,EidsaunetW,ElsingerC,FrankRA,GatsonisC,GigerML,Gupta1051SN,GustafsonD,HoekstraOS,JacksonEF,KaramL,KelloffGJ,KinahanPE,McLennanG,MillerCG,Mozley1052PD, Muller KE, Patt R, Raunig D, Rosen M, Rupani H, Schwartz LH, Siegel BA, Sorensen AG, Wahl RL,1053Waterton JC, Wolf W, Zahlmann G, Zimmerman B. Quantitative imaging test approval and biomarker1054qualification:interrelatedbutdistinctactivities.Radiology259(3):875-884,2011.PMID:21325035.1055
Buckler AJ, Bresolin L, Dunnick NR, Sullivan DC. A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder1056participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging. Radiology 258(3):906-914, 2011. PMID:105721339352.1058
Burger IA,HuserDM,BurgerC, vonSchulthessGK,BuckA.Repeatabilityof FDGquantification in tumor1059imaging:averagedSUVsaresuperiortoSUVmax.NuclMedBiol39(5):666-670,2012.PMID:22381783.1060
de Langen AJ, Vincent A, Velasquez LM, van Tinteren H, Boellaard R, Shankar LK, Boers M, Smit EF,1061Stroobants S, Weber WA, Hoekstra OS. Repeatability of 18F-FDG uptake measurements in tumors: a1062metaanalysis.JNuclMed53(5):701-708,2012.PMID:22496583.1063
DelbekeD,ColemanRE,GuiberteauMJ,BrownML,RoyalHD,SiegelBA,TownsendDW,BerlandLL,Parker1064JA, Hubner K, StabinMG, Zubal G, KachelriessM, Cronin V, Holbrook S. Procedure guideline for tumor1065imagingwith18F-FDGPET/CT1.0.JNuclMed47(5):885-895,2006.PMID:16644760.1066
DootRK,ScheuermannJS,ChristianPE,KarpJS,KinahanPE.Instrumentationfactorsaffectingvarianceand1067biasofquantifyingtraceruptakewithPET/CT.MedPhys37(11):6035-6046,2010.PMID:21158315.1068
DootRK,KurlandBF,KinahanPE,MankoffDA.DesignconsiderationsforusingPETasaresponsemeasure1069insinglesiteandmulticenterclinicaltrials.AcadRadiol19(2):184-190,2012.PMID:22104290.1070
FaheyFH,KinahanPE,DootRK,KocakM,ThurstonH,PoussaintTY.VariabilityinPETquantitationwithina1071multicenterconsortium.MedPhys37(7):3660-3666,2010.PMID:20831073.1072
Fletcher JW,DjulbegovicB,SoaresHP,SiegelBA, LoweVJ, LymanGH,ColemanRE,WahlR,Paschold JC,1073AvrilN,EinhornLH,SuhWW,SamsonD,DelbekeD,GormanM,ShieldsAF.Recommendationsontheuse1074of18F-FDGPETinoncology.JNuclMed49(3):480-508,2008.PMID:18287273.1075
FringsV,deLangenAJ,SmitEF,vanVeldenFH,HoekstraOS,vanTinterenH,BoellaardR.Repeatabilityof1076metabolicallyactivevolumemeasurementswith18F-FDGand18F-FLTPETinnon-smallcell lungcancer.J1077NuclMed51(12):1870-1877,2010.PMID:21078791.1078
Gronenschild EH, Habets P, Jacobs HI, Mengelers R, Rozendaal N, van Os J, Marcelis M. The effects of1079FreeSurferversion,workstationtype,andMacintoshoperatingsystemversiononanatomicalvolumeand1080corticalthicknessmeasurements.PLoSOne7(6):e38234,2012.PMID:22675527.1081
HallettWA,Maguire RP,McCarthy TJ, SchmidtME, Young H. Considerations for generic oncology FDG-1082PET/CTprotocolpreparationindrugdevelopment.IDrugs10(11):791-796,2007.PMID:17968761.1083
HattM, Cheze-Le Rest C, Aboagye EO, Kenny LM, Rosso L, Turkheimer FE, Albarghach NM,Metges JP,1084PradierO,VisvikisD. Reproducibility of 18F-FDGand3’-deoxy-3’-18F-fluorothymidinePET tumor volume1085measurements.JNuclMed51(9):1368-1376,2010.PMID:20720054.1086
JaceneHA,LeboulleuxS,BabaS,ChatzifotiadisD,GoudarziB,TeytelbaumO,HortonKM,KamelI,Macura1087KJ,TsaiHL,Kowalski J,WahlRL.Assessmentof interobserver reproducibility inquantitative18F-FDGPET1088
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:50
andCTmeasurementsoftumorresponsetotherapy.JNuclMed50(11):1760-1769,2009.PMID:19837757.1089
Jackson T, ChungMK,MercierG,OzonoffA, SubramaniamRM. FDGPET/CT interobserver agreement in1090headandneckcancer:FDGandCTmeasurementsoftheprimarytumorsite.NuclMedCommun33(3):305-1091312,2012.PMID:22227560.1092
KamibayashiT,TsuchidaT,DemuraY,TsujikawaT,OkazawaH,KudohT,KimuraH.Reproducibilityofsemi-1093quantitativeparameters inFDG-PETusingtwodifferentPETscanners: influenceofattenuationcorrection1094methodandexaminationinterval.MolImagingBiol10(3):162-166,2008.PMID:18408977.1095
Kinahan PE, Doot RK, Wanner-Roybal M, Bidaut LM, Armato SG, Meyer CR, McLennan G. PET/CT1096Assessment of Response to Therapy: Tumor ChangeMeasurement, Truth Data, and Error. Transl Oncol10972(4):223-230,2009.PMID:19956382.1098
KinahanPE,FletcherJW.Positronemissiontomography-computedtomographystandardizeduptakevalues1099inclinicalpracticeandassessingresponsetotherapy.SeminUltrasoundCTMR31(6):496-505,2010.PMID:110021147377.1101
KrakNC,BoellaardR,HoekstraOS,Twisk JW,HoekstraCJ,LammertsmaAA.EffectsofROIdefinitionand1102reconstructionmethodonquantitativeoutcomeandapplicabilityinaresponsemonitoringtrial.EurJNucl1103MedMolImaging32(3):294-301,2005.PMID:15791438.1104
KumarV,NathK,BermanCG,KimJ,TanvetyanonT,ChiapporiAA,GatenbyRA,GilliesRJ,EikmanEA.1105VarianceofSUVsforFDG-PET/CTisgreaterinclinicalpracticethanunderidealstudysettings.ClinNucl1106Med.2013Mar;38(3):175-82.doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279ffdf.PMID23354032[PubMed-inprocess].1107
Liu C, Pierce LA,AlessioAM, KinahanPE. The impact of respiratorymotionon tumorquantification and1108delineationinstaticPET/CTimaging.PhysMedBiol54(24):7345-7362,2009.PMID:19926910.1109
LockhartCM,MacDonaldLR,AlessioAM,McDougaldWA,DootRK,KinahanPE.Quantifyingandreducing1110theeffectofcalibrationerroronvariabilityofPET/CTstandardizeduptakevaluemeasurements.JNuclMed111152(2):218-224,2011.PMID:21233174.1112
LodgeM,Wahl,R.CharacterizingtherepeatabilityofoncologyPETstandardizeduptakevalues.JNuclMed111354(2):335,2013.1114
MawlawiO,ErasmusJJ,MundenRF,PanT,KnightAE,MacapinlacHA,PodoloffDA,ChasenM.Quantifying1115theeffectofIVcontrastmediaonintegratedPET/CT:clinicalevaluation.AJRAmJRoentgenol186(2):308-1116319,2006.PMID:16423932.1117
Minn H, Zasadny KR, Quint LE,Wahl RL. Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitativemeasurements for1118evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake at PET. Radiology 196(1):167-173, 1995. PMID:11197784562.1120
NahmiasC,WahlLM.Reproducibilityofstandardizeduptakevaluemeasurementsdeterminedby18F-FDG1121PETinmalignanttumors.JNuclMed49(11):1804-1808,2008.PMID:18927325.1122
NakamotoY,ZasadnyKR,MinnH,WahlRL.Reproducibilityofcommonsemi-quantitativeparameters for1123evaluating lung cancer glucose metabolism with positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-1124[18F]fluoro-D-glucose.MolImagingBiol4(2):171-178,2002.PMID:14537140.1125
NestleU,KrempS,Schaefer-SchulerA,Sebastian-WelschC,HellwigD,RubeC,KirschCM.Comparisonof1126different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in1127radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 46(8):1342-1348, 2005. PMID:1128
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:51
16085592.1129
Subramaniam R, et al. FDG PET/CT Liver SULmean: Inter-reader agreement and impact of placement of1130volumeofinterest.Radiology2012(inpress).1131
VuTT.Standardizationofbodysurfaceareacalculations.JournalofOncologyPharmacyPractice8(2-3):49-113254,2002.1133
VelasquezLM,BoellaardR,KolliaG,HayesW,HoekstraOS,LammertsmaAA,GalbraithSM.Repeatabilityof113418F-FDGPETinamulticenterphaseIstudyofpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalmalignancies.JNucl1135Med50(10):1646-1654,2009.PMID:19759105.1136
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET1137responsecriteriainsolidtumors.JNuclMed50Suppl1:122S-150S,2009.PMID:19403881.1138
Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thodtmann R, Hanauske AR, Schwaiger M. Reproducibility of metabolic1139measurementsinmalignanttumorsusingFDGPET.JNuclMed40(11):1771-1777,1999.PMID:10565769.1140
WeberWA.Assessingtumorresponsetotherapy.JNuclMed50Suppl1:1S-10S,2009.PMID:19380403.1141
Weber,WA,CAGatsonis,PDMozley,LGHanna,AFShields,DRAberle,RGovindan,DATorigian,JSKarp,JQ1142Yu,RMSubramaniam,RAHalvorsen,BASiegel,6678ResearchteamACRIN,andResearchteamMK-0646-1143008.“Repeatabilityof18f-FdgPET/CTinAdvancedNon-SmallCellLungCancer:ProspectiveAssessmentin21144MulticenterTrials.”JNuclMed56,no.8(2015):1137–43.1145
YoungH,BaumR,CremeriusU,HerholzK,HoekstraO,LammertsmaAA,PruimJ,PriceP.Measurementof1146clinicalandsubclinicaltumourresponseusing[18F]-fluorodeoxyglucoseandpositronemissiontomography:1147reviewand1999EORTCrecommendations.EuropeanOrganizationforResearchandTreatmentofCancer1148(EORTC)PETStudyGroup.EurJCancer35(13):1773-1782,1999.PMID:10673991.1149
1150
Appendices1151
AppendixA:AcknowledgementsandAttributions1152
This document is proffered by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Quantitative Imaging1153Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) FDG-PET/CT Biomarker Committee. The FDG-PET/CT Biomarker Committee is1154composed of physicians, scientists, engineers and statisticians representing the imaging device1155manufacturers, image analysis software developers, image analysis facilities and laboratories,1156biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government research organizations, professional1157societies, and regulatory agencies, among others. Amore detailed description of the QIBA FDG-PET/CT1158groupanditsworkcanbefoundatthefollowingweblink: http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=FDG-1159PET_tech_ctte1160
ThefollowingweremembersoftheQIBAFDG-PET/CTBiomarkerCommitteeduringthewritingofthis1161Profile(inalphabeticalorder):1162
1163
QIBAFDG-PETBiomarkerCommittee(inalphabeticalorder)
PaulE.Kinahan,PhD(Co-Chair) UniversityofWashington
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:52
LingX.Shao,PhD(Co-Chair) PhilipsHealthcareRichardL.Wahl,MD,FACR(Co-Chair) JohnsHopkinsUniversityKeithAllberg RadQual,LLCRamseyD.Badawi,PhD UniversityofCalifornia,DavisStellaM.Batalles,MD InstitutoCardiovasculardeRosarioRichardBaumgartner,PhD MerckResearchLaboratoriesBernardBendriem,PhD SiemensMedicalSolutionsUSARonaldBoellaard,PhD VUMedicalCenter,Amsterdam,NLJohnBuatti,MD UniversityofIowaChrisBuckle,MD UniversityofChicagoAndrewJ.Buckler,MS ElucidBioimagingInc.JaniceCampbell,PhD Wm.BeaumontHospitalPaulL.Carson,PhD UniversityofMichiganHealthSystemMichaelE.Casey,PhD SiemensSungChang,PhD AmgenSandraChica,MD NovartisPaulE.Christian UniversityofUtah/SNMMIQIBARepresentativeDavidA.Clunie,MBBS PixelMedDanielCoiro DelfinImagemPatriciaE.Cole,MD,PhD EliLillyandCompanyPeterDavidCorr,MD UAEUniversityBarbaraCroft,PhD DukeUniversityShivaK.Das,PhD DukeUniversitySimonDeBruin,MSEE SegamiCorporationToddDeckard,MSEE VitalImages,Inc.JonDeVries,MBA MergeHealthcareRobertK.Doot,PhD UniversityofPennsylvaniaGaryS.Dorfman,MD WeillCornellMedicalCollegeVinayA.Duddalwar,MD,FRCR USC/NorrisComprehensiveCancerCenterRichardM.Eaton,JD MedicalImaging&TechnologyAlliance(MITA)EdwardA.Eikman,MD MoffittCancerCenterBrianElston WashingtonUniversityRichardA.Frank,MD,PhD,FFPM GEHealthcareKirkFrey,MD,PhD UniversityofMichiganDanielGagnon,PhD ToshibaSusanGalbraith,PhD AstrazenecaConstantineGatsonis,PhD BrownUniversityIgorD.Grachev,MD,PhD GEHealthcareMichaelGraham,PhD,MD UniversityofIowaDonaldP.Harrington,MA,MD StateUniversityofNewYorkMarkusT.Harz,PhD FraunhoferMEVIS,InstforMedicalImageComputingHowardHigley,PhD CCSAssociates,Inc.OttoHoekstra,MD VUMedicalCenter,Amsterdam,NLJohnM.Hoffman,MD UniversityofUtahBlaineC.Horvath,RT BioClinica,Inc.
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:53
WilliamHowe,MD,PhD SiemensMedicalSolutionsUSAYuyingC.Hwang,PhD AmgenToddJohnson,MS VitalImages,Inc.LisaR.Karam,PhD NISTGaryJ.Kelloff,MD CancerImagingProgram,NCIRobertKoeppe,PhD UniversityofMichiganSteveKohlmyer GEHealthcareFeng-Ming(Spring)Kong,MD,PhD UniversityofMichiganMartinA.Lodge,PhD JohnsHopkinsUniversityLawrence(Larry)R.MacDonald,PhD UniversityofWashingtonMarianneMaffoni TeraRecon,Inc.PiotrManiawski PhilipsHealthcarePaulMarsden,MD King'sCollegeLondonTimothyJ.McCarthy,PhD PfizerAlexander(Sandy)McEwan,MB SNMMIColinG.Miller,PhD BioClinica,Inc.MatthewP.Miller,PhD GEHealthcareMichaelA.Miller,PhD IndianaUniversityNeruMunshi,PhD PAREXELInternationalDennisNelson,PhD MIMvistaCorp.SarahJ.Nelson,PhD UniversityofCalifornia,SanFranciscoChuckNortmann PhilipsHealthcareMiguelH.Pampaloni,MD UniversityofCaliforniaSanFranciscoAnshumanPanda,PhD MayoClinicSeong-HoonPark,MD WonkwangUniversitySchoolofMedicineSoniaH.Pearson-White,PhD TheBiomarkersConsortium,FNIHEricS.Perlman,MD PerlmanAdvisoryGroupLarryAlanPierce,PhD UniversityofWashingtonLucyPike,PhD King'sCollegeLondonWolfS.Richter PharmtraceChristinaL.Sammet,PhD NorthwesternUniversitySteffenSammet,MD,PhD UniversityofChicagoSubhendraN.Sarkar,PhD,RT BethIsraelDeaconessHospitalAnnetteSchmid,PhD PAREXELInternationalLalithaShankar,MD,PhD NIHBarryA.Siegel,MD WashingtonUniversityinSt.LouisDebiSimone GEHealthcareAnandK.Singh,MD Harvard-MassachusettsGeneralHospitalAnneM.Smith,PhD SiemensMedicalSolutionsUSA,Inc.JuergenSoldner SiemensMedicalSolutionsUSA,Inc.RathanSubramaniam,MD,PhD JohnsHopkinsUniversityDanielC.Sullivan,MD DukeUniversityJohnJ.Sunderland,PhD UniversityofIowaFukHayTang,PhD HongKongPolytechnicUniversityUkihideTateishi,MD,PhD YokohamaCityUniversityGraduateSchoolofMedicine
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:54
ValerieTreyer,PhD Consultant,NeuroscientistTimothyG.Turkington,PhD DukeUniversityRonaldVanHeertum,MD BioClinica,Inc.MattVanderhoek,PhD HenryFordHospitalRonaldVanHeertum,MD BioClinica,Inc.EtienneVonLavante,D.Phil MiradaMedicalWenliWang,PhD ToshibaWolfgangWeber,MD MemorialSloan-KetteringCancerCenterRalphWickenhoefer,MD CentralHospitalGermanArmedForcesScottD.Wollenweber,PhD GEHealthcareJohnG.Wolodzko,PhD BioClinica,Inc.RoxanneYaghoubi AcademyofRadiologyResearchJeffreyT.Yap,PhD Harvard-DanaFarberCancerInstituteBrendaYe,MD FDATerryS.Yoo,PhD CDERKwon-HaYoon,MD,PhD WonkwangUniversityHelenYoung,PhD AstraZenecaT.C.Zhao,PhD TeraRecon,Inc.BrianE.Zimmerman,PhD NIST1164
TheFDG-PET/CTBiomarkerCommitteeisdeeplygratefulforthesupportandtechnicalassistanceprovided1165bythestaffoftheRadiologicalSocietyofNorthAmerica.1166
1167
AppendixB:BackgroundInformationforClaim1168
A number of publications report test-retest repeatability for tumor SUV measurements with FDG PET1169[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Table 1 lists these publications and summarizes some of their results. Comparing1170repeatability measurements from the various reports is complicated by the different methodologies1171employedineachstudyandalsothedifferentmetricsusedtocharacterizerepeatability.1172
Table 1. Selected repeatability parameters extracted from literature publications. Where multiple SUV1173types were reported, preference was given to SUVmax as this SUV definition was more comparable1174between studies. The columnmarked ‘Inferred wCV’ is an estimate of the within-subject coefficient of1175variationbaseduponthereportedparametersandmaynotappearintheoriginalmanuscripts.Detailsof1176howtheseInferredwCVvalueswerederivedaredescribedinthetextandinTable2.1177
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:55
11781179
Theregion-of-interest(ROI)orvolume-of-interest(VOI)methodologyvariedbetweenpublications.Minnet1180al [1] report SUVmean derived from a fixed size 1.2 × 1.2 cm region-of-interest.Weber et al [2] report1181SUVmean derived from a volume-of-interest defined by a 50% isocontour. The remaining papers report1182SUVmax,althoughdataformultipleROIdefinitionsweresometimesreported.BecauseSUVmaxwasmore1183commonlyreportedamongsttheserepeatabilitypapersandwasmorecomparablebetweenstudies,table11841focusedprimarilyonSUVmax.1185
Nahmias and Wahl [5] report SUVmax but, unlike the other publications, they present their results in1186absoluteSUVunits,asopposedtorelativeunits.Directcomparisonwiththeotherreportswastherefore1187not possible. Kamibayashi et al [6] compared the repeatability of SUVs measured on different scanner1188systems,whereas theother reports involve test-retest studieson the same scanner. For this reason the1189Kamibayashi data were also not directly comparable with the other papers. The remaining publications1190[3,4,7,8,10]areamenabletomoredirectcomparisonastheyallreporttherepeatabilityofSUVmax,with1191testandreteststudiesbothperformedonthesamescannersystem.1192
Afurthercomplicationwhencomparingreportsisthedifferentmetricsusedtocharacterizerepeatability.1193Intable1wetranslatethereportedrepeatabilitymeasurementstoawithin-subjectcoefficientofvariation1194(wCOV)toallowamoredirectcomparison.Basedonthedatainthelast5rowsoftable1[3,4,7,8,10], it1195canbeseenthatthewithinsubjectcoefficientofvariationforSUVmaxwasintherange10.0–12.0%.1196
Table 2 summarizes the relationships that were involved in converting the published repeatability1197parameterstowithin-subjectcoefficientofvariation.1198
1199
Table2.Relationshipsusedtocomparerepeatabilitymetricsfoundintheliterature.1200
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:56
12011202
Oneassumptionthatwasmadeduringtheseconversionswasthatthepercentagedifference(D)between1203test-retestSUVmeasurementswasnormallydistributedwithzeromean.Whilethisassumptionmaynotbe1204strictlyapplicableoverawide rangeofSUVs, it isanassumption that is implicitlybeingmadewhenever120595%limitsofrepeatabilityareemployed[7,8].Applyingthissameassumptiontothestudiesthatreportthe1206mean absolute percentage difference (D_MAD) allows their results to be simply related to the other1207publicationsthatreportthestandarddeviationbyD_MAD=sqrt(2/pi)D_SD,asshownbelow.1208
D_MAD = 1σ 2π
x − µ e−x−µ( )22σ 2 dx
−∞
∞
∫
= 2σ 2π
x − µ( )e−x−µ2
2σ 2 dx0
∞
∫
let r = x − µ( )2
2σ 2 , and dr = x − µ( )σ 2 dx, and limits are unchanged
x=0
x=∞
∫ →r=0
r=∞
∫then,
D_MAD = 2πσ e−r dr
0
∞
∫ = 2πσ e−r
∞
0= 2
πσ 1− 0[ ]= 2
πσ ! 0.80σ
1209References1210
1 MinnH,ZasadnyKR,QuintLE,WahlRL.Lungcancer:reproducibilityofquantitativemeasurementsfor1211evaluating2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucoseuptakeatPET.Radiology,196,1(1995),167-173.1212
2 Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thodtmann R, Hanauske A-R, Schwaiger M. Reproducibility of metabolic1213measurementsinmalignanttumorsusingFDGPET.JNuclMed,40,11(1999),1771-1777.1214
3 NakamotoY,ZasadnyKR,MinnH,WahlRL.Reproducibilityofcommonsemi-quantitativeparameters1215for evaluating lung cancer glucosemetabolismwith positron emission tomography using 2-deoxy-2-1216[18F]fluoro-D-glucose.MolImagingBiol,4(2002),171-178.1217
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:57
4 KrakNC,BoellaardR,HoekstraOS,TwiskJWR,HoekstraCJ,LammertsmaAA.EffectsofROIdefinition1218and reconstructionmethodonquantitativeoutcomeand applicability in a responsemonitoring trial.1219EurJNuclMedMolImaging,32,3(2005),294-301.1220
5 NahmiasC,WahlLM.Reproducibilityofstandardizeduptakevaluemeasurementsdeterminedby18F-1221FDGPETinmalignanttumors.JNuclMed,49,11(2008),1804-1808.1222
6 KamibayashiT,TsuchidaT,DemuraY,etal.Reproducibilityofsemi-quantitativeparametersinFDG-PET1223usingtwodifferentPETscanners:influenceofattenuationcorrectionmethodandexaminationinterval.1224MolImagingBiol,10(2008),162-166.1225
7 VelasquezLM,BoellaardR,KolliaG,etal.Repeatabilityof18F-FDGPETinamulticenterphase1study1226ofpatientswithadvancedgastrointestinalmalignancies.JNuclMed,50,10(2009),1646-1654.1227
8 HattM,Cheze-LeRestC,AboagyeEO,KennyLM,RossoL,TurkheimerFE,AlbarghachNM,MetgesJP,1228Pradier O, Visvikis D. Reproducibility of 18F-FDG and 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET tumor1229volumemeasurements.JNuclMed.,51(2010),1368-1376.1230
9 KumarV,NathK,BermanCG,KimJ,TanvetyanonT,ChiapporiAA,GatenbyRA,GilliesRJ,EikmanEA.1231VarianceofSUVsforFDG-PET/CTisgreaterinclinicalpracticethanunderidealstudysettings.ClinNucl1232Med.2013Mar;38(3):175-82.PMID233540321233
10 Weber,WA,CAGatsonis,PDMozley,LGHanna,AFShields,DRAberle,RGovindan,DATorigian,JSKarp,1234JQYu,RMSubramaniam,RAHalvorsen,BASiegel,6678ResearchteamACRIN,andResearchteamMK-12350646-008. “Repeatability of 18f-Fdg PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective1236Assessmentin2MulticenterTrials.”JNuclMed56,no.8(2015):1137–43.1237
11.Bland,JMandDGAltman.“MeasurementErrorProportionaltotheMean.”BMJ313,no.7049(1996):1238106.1239
1240
AppendixC:ConventionsandDefinitions1241
ConventionUsedtoRepresentProfilerequirements1242
Requirements foradhering to thisProfilearepresented in tables/boxesas shown in theexamplebelow.1243Shaded boxes are intended future requirements, and are not at this time required for adhering to the1244Profile.Boldtextisusedforrequirementsthatareformattedaschecklists,whichareprovidedinAppendix1245I.Theformatusedisthefollowing:1246
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Normativetext:Clearboxesarecurrentrequirements
Shadedboxesareintendedforfuturerequirements
Boldtextindicatesrequirementsincludedinchecklists(AppendixI)
1247
Itemswithintablesarenormative(i.e.arerequiredinordertobecompliantwiththeQIBAprotocol).The1248intentofthenormativetextistobeprescriptiveanddetailedtofacilitateimplementation.Ingeneralthe1249
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:58
intentistospecifythefinalstateoroutput,andnothowthatistobeachieved.1250
Allothertextoutsideofthesetablesisconsideredinformativeonly.1251
Acondensedtablefromsection3.2.1.2‘SubjectPositioning’isreproducedbelowasanillustrativeexample.1252
1253
Parameter Entity/Actor Specification
Respiratorymotionminimization
Technologist IfthepatientisobservedtotakeadeepbreathduringtheCTscanitshouldbedocumentedandarepeatCTstudyshouldbeconsidered.
Respiratorymotionminimization
PET/CTScanner
ThePET/CTscannershallprovidemethodstominimizethePETimageerrorsintroducedbyrespiratorymotion.
Breathingandmotionnon-conformance
Technologist
TheTechnologistshalldocumentissuesregardingsubjectnon-conformancewithbreathingandmotion.
TheTechnologistshalldocumentissuesregardingsubjectnon-conformancewithbreathingandmotionusingthecommondataformatmechanism(AppendixE).
1254
1255
Definitions1256
18F-FDGorFDG:2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose,aglucoseanalog,withthepositron-emittingradioactive1257isotopefluorine-18substitutedforthenormalhydroxylgroupatthe2'positionintheglucosemolecule.1258FDGisthemostcommonlyused(>90%)radiotracerinPETimaging.1259
Accreditation: Approval by an independent body or group for broad clinical usage (requires ongoing1260QA/QC)e.g.ACR,IAC,TJC(listedbelow).1261
AC:AttenuationCorrection.Attenuationisaaneffectthatoccurswhenphotonsemittedbytheradiotracer1262insidethebodyareabsorbedby interveningtissue.Theresult is thatstructuresdeep inthebodyare1263reconstructedashaving falsely low (or evennegative) traceruptake. ContemporaryPET/CT scanners1264estimate attenuation using integrated x-ray CT equipment. While attenuation-corrected images are1265generallyfaithfulrepresentationsofradiotracerdistribution,thecorrectionprocessisitselfsusceptible1266tosignificantartifacts.1267
Conformance:Meetingthe listofrequirementsdescribed inthisdocument,whicharenecessarytomeet1268themeasurementclaimsforthisQIBAProfile.1269
CRF:CaseReportForm(CRF)isapaperorelectronicquestionnairespecificallyusedinclinicaltrialresearch.1270TheCRF isusedbythesponsorof theclinical trial (ordesignatedCROetc.) tocollectdata fromeach1271participatingsite.Alldataoneachpatientparticipatinginaclinicaltrialareheldand/ordocumentedin1272theCRF,includingadverseevents.1273
CT: X-ray computed tomography (CT) is a medical imaging technique that utilizes X-rays to produce1274tomographicimagesoftherelativex-rayabsorption,whichiscloselylinkedtotissuedensity.1275
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:59
DICOM:DigitalImagingandCommunicationsinMedicine(DICOM)isasetofstandardsformedicalimages1276andrelatedinformation.Itdefinesformatsformedicalimagesthatcanbeexchangedinamannerthat1277preservesthedataandqualitynecessaryforclinicaluse.1278
Dose:Canrefertoeitherradiationdoseorasajargontermfor'totalradioactivity'.Forexample,10mCIof127918F-FDGisoftenreferredtoasa10mCidose.1280
FDG:See18F-FDG.1281
LBM:LeanBodyMassiscalculatedbysubtractingbodyfatweightfromtotalbodyweight.TheLeanbody1282mass(LBM)hasbeendescribedasanindexsuperiortototalbodyweightforprescribingproperlevels1283ofmedicationsandforassessingmetabolicdisorders.1284
mCi:millicuries.Anon-SIunitof radioactivity,definedas1mCi=3.7×10^7decaysper second.Clinical1285FDG-PETstudiesinject(typically)5to15mCiof18F-FDG.1286
MBq:megabequerel.AnSI-derivedunitofradioactivitydefinedas1.0×10^6decayspersecond.1287
Metabolic Response / Metabolic Disease. A classification based on the visible level of FDG uptake1288associated with malignant solid tumors. There are several specific classifications depending on the1289criteriaused:1290
• CMR: CompleteMetabolic Response.A complete resolutionof FDG-PETuptakewithin the tumor1291volumesothatitisindistinguishablefromthesurroundingnormaltissue.1292
• PMR: Partial Metabolic Response. A reduction in FDG uptake. The thresholds used for this1293determination depend on the criteria used. Two such criteria are the EORTC [Young, 1999] and1294PERCIST[Wahl,2009]proposals.1295
• PMD:ProgressiveMetabolicDisease.AnincreaseinFDGuptakerelativetoapredefinedthreshold.1296
• SMD:StableMetabolicDisease.NochangeinFDGuptakerelativetopredefinedthresholds.1297
PERCIST:PETResponseCriteria forSolidTumors [Wahl,2009].A frameworkproposed forusingFDG-PET1298imagingasacancertherapyresponsecriteriaforsolidtumors.Proposedasamoreaccuratealternative1299toRECISTforseveraltypesofsolidtumors.1300
PET:Positronemission tomography (PET) isa tomographic imaging technique thatproducesan imageof1301theinvivodistributionofaradiotracer,typicallyFDG.1302
PET/CT:Positronemissiontomography/computedtomography(PET/CT)isamedicalimagingsystemthat1303combines inasinglegantrysystembothPositronEmissionTomography(PET)andanx-rayComputed1304Tomography (CT) scanners, so that images acquired from both devices can be taken nearly-1305simultaneously.1306
Profile: A QIBA Profile is a document that describes a specific performance Claim and how it can be1307achieved.AProfileconsistsofoneormoreClaimsandassociatedDetails.1308
• Claims:tellauserwhatcanbeaccomplishedbyfollowingtheProfile.1309
• Details:tellavendorwhatmustbeimplementedintheirproduct;andtellauserwhatprocedures1310arenecessary.1311
QA: Quality Assurance. Proactive definition of the process or procedures for task performance. The1312maintenanceofadesired levelofquality inaserviceorproduct,esp.bymeansofattentiontoevery1313stageoftheprocessofdeliveryorproduction.1314
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:60
QC: Quality Control. Specific tests performed to ensure target requirements of QA program are met.1315Typicallybytestingasampleoftheoutputagainstthespecification.1316
Qualification: Approved by an independent body or group for either general participation in clinical1317research (ACRIN-CQIE , SNM-CTNothers)or fora specific clinical trial (requiresongoingQA/QC).This1318includesCROs,ACRIN,SNM-CTN,CALGBandothercorelaboratories.1319
RECIST:ResponseEvaluationCriteria inSolidTumors (RECIST).A setofpublished rules thatdefinewhen1320cancer patients improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stabilize"), or worsen ("progression") during1321treatments.Basedonanatomicalsizechangesofsolidtumors.Commonlyusedbutalsocontroversial.1322
ROI:Regionofinterest.Aregioninanimagethatisspecifiedinsomemanner,typicallywithuser-controlled1323graphicalelementsthatcanbeeither2Dareasor3Dvolumes.Theseelementsinclude,butnotlimited1324to, ellipses, ellipsoids, rectangles, rectangular volumes, circles, cylinders, polygons, and free-form1325shapes. An ROI can also be defined by a segmentation algorithm that operates on the image.1326Segmentation algorithms include, but are not limited to, fixed-value thresholding, fixed-percentage1327thresholding,gradientedgedetection,andBayesianmethods.WiththedefinitionofanROI,metricsare1328then calculated for the portion of the imagewithin the ROI. Thesemetrics can include, but are not1329limitedto,mean,maximum,standarddeviation,andvolumeorarea.NotethatthetermROIcanrefer1330toa2Dareaonasingleimagesliceora3Dvolume.Insomecases,thetermROIisusedtoreferto2D1331areaandthetermvolumeofinterest(VOI)isusedtorefertoa3Dvolume.InthisProfilethetermROIis1332usedtorefertoboth2Dareasand3Dvolumesasneeded.1333
SUV: Standardized uptake value. A measure of relative radiotracer uptake within the body. Typically1334definedforatimepointtasSUV(t)=r(t)/(d’/V),wherer(t)isthemeasuredradioactivityconcentration1335withintheROI(typicallyinunitsofkBq/ml),d’isthedecay-correctedinjectedradioactivity(or'dose'),1336andVisasurrogateforthedistributionvolume.Typically,patientweightor leanbodymassareused1337forV.1338
Notes:1339
1. TheSUVcanchangeovertime,someasuringr(t) ataconsistenttimepointisrecommended.1340
2. Eitherbodyweightor leanbodymassareusedforasurrogateforthedistributionvolume,sothe1341SUVunitsareg/ml(Section3.4.3)1342
3. Forauniformdistributionofradiotracer,theSUVeverywherewouldbeexactly1g/ml.1343
4. ThemeasuredSUVstatisticistypicallyoneofthefollowing:1344
i. SUVmean:TheaverageSUVwithintheROI.1345
ii. SUVmax:ThemaximumSUVwithintheROI.1346
iii. SUVpeak:TheaverageSUVwithina fixed-sizedROI, typicallya1cmdiametersphere.The1347sphereslocationisadjustedsuchthattheaverageSUVismaximized.1348
iv. TLG:Totallesionglycolysis.ThesummedSUVwithintheROI.1349
TOF:TimeofFlight(TOF)isaPETimagingtechniqueutilizingdifferentialannihilationphotontraveltimes1350tomoreaccuratelylocalizetheinvivodistributionofaradiotracer.1351
UPICT:UniformProtocolsForImaginginClinicalTrials(UPICT).ARSNA-QIBAinitiativethatseekstoprovide1352alibraryofannotatedprotocolsthatsupportclinicaltrialswithininstitutions,cooperativegroups,and1353trials consortia. TheUPICTprotocols arebasedon consensus standards thatmeet aminimumsetof1354
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:61
criteriatoensureimagingdataquality.1355
VOI:Volumeofinterest.SeedefinitionforROI.1356
1357
Organizations1358
AAPM:TheAmericanAssociationofPhysicistsinMedicineisamembersocietyconcernedwiththetopics1359of medical physics, radiation oncology, imaging physics. The AAPM is a scientific, educational, and1360professionalorganizationofover8,000medicalphysicists.1361
ACR:The36,000membersof|includeradiologists,radiationoncologists,medicalphysicists,interventional1362radiologists,nuclearmedicinephysiciansandalliedhealthprofessionals.1363
ACRIN:TheAmericanCollegeofRadiologyImagingNetwork(ACRIN)isaprogramoftheAmericanCollege1364of Radiology and a National Cancer Institute cooperative group. Focused on cancer-related research in1365clinicaltrials.1366
CLIA: Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments: Accreditation system for establishing quality1367standardsforlaboratorytesting.1368
CQIE:TheCentersofQuantitativeImagingExcellence(CQIE)programwasdevelopedbyACRINinresponse1369toasolicitationforproposalsissuedinDecember2009bySAIC-FrederickonbehalfoftheNationalCancer1370Institute (NCI). Theprimaryobjectiveof theCQIEProgram is toestablisha resourceof ‘trial ready’ sites1371within theNCICancerCentersProgram thatare capableof conductingclinical trials inwhich there isan1372integralmolecularand/orfunctionaladvancedimagingendpoint.1373
CRO:ContractResearchOrganizationAcommercialornot-for-profitorganizationdesignatedtoperforma1374centralizedandstandardizedcollection,analysis,and/orreviewofthedatageneratedduringaclinicaltrial.1375Additionalactivitieswhichmaybeperformedbyan imagingcore lab includetrainingandqualificationof1376imaging centers for the specific imaging required in a clinical trial, development of imaging acquisition1377manuals, development of independent imaging review charters, centralized collection and archiving of1378imagesreceivedfromstudysites,performingpre-specifiedqualitycontrolchecks/testsonincomingimages1379and development and implementation of quality assurance processes and procedures to ensure that1380imagessubmittedareinaccordwithimagingtimepointsspecifiedinthestudyprotocolandconsistentwith1381thequalityrequiredtoallowtheprotocol-specifiedanalysis/assessments1382
CTN: The Clinical Trials Network (CTN) was formed by SNMMI in 2008 to facilitate the effective use of1383molecularimagingbiomarkersinclinicaltrials.1384
EANM: The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) constitutes the European umbrella1385organizationofnuclearmedicineinEurope1386
EARL:EANMResearchLtd(EARL)wasformedbyEANMin2006topromotemulticentrenuclearmedicine1387andresearch.1388
ECOG-ACRIN:ANationalCancerInstitutecooperativegroupformedfromthe2012mergeroftheEastern1389CooperativeOncologyGroup(ECOG)andtheAmericanCollegeofRadiologyImagingNetwork(ACRIN).1390
EORTC:TheEuropeanOrganizationforResearchandTreatmentofCancerorEORTCisaninternationalnon-1391profit organization that develops, coordinates, and stimulates cancer laboratory and clinical research in1392Europe.1393
EMA:EuropeanMedicinesAgency is a EuropeanUnionagency for theevaluationofmedicinalproducts.1394
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:62
RoughlyparalleltotheU.S.FoodandDrugAdministration(FDA),butwithoutFDA-stylecentralization.1395
FDA:FoodandDrugAdministration is responsible forprotectingandpromotingpublichealth in theU.S.1396throughtheregulationandsupervisionoffoodsafety,tobaccoproducts,dietarysupplements,prescription1397and over-the-counter pharmaceutical medications, vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, blood transfusions,1398medicaldevices,electromagneticradiationemittingdevices,andveterinaryproducts.1399
IAC:TheIntersocietalAccreditationCommission(IAC)providesaccreditationprogramsforVascularTesting,1400Echocardiography,Nuclear/PET,MRI,CT/Dental,CarotidStentingandVeinCenter.1401
MITA: The Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance is a division NEMA that develops and promotes1402standardsformedicalimagingandradiationtherapyequipment.Thesestandardsarevoluntaryguidelines1403thatestablishcommonlyacceptedmethodsofdesign,production,testingandcommunicationforimaging1404andcancertreatmentproducts.1405
NCRI: National Cancer Research Institute. The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) is a UK-wide1406partnership between the government, charity and industry which promotes co-operation in cancer1407research among the 22 member organizations for the benefit of patients, the public and the scientific1408community.1409
NEMA:NationalElectricalManufacturersAssociationisaforumforthedevelopmentoftechnicalstandards1410byelectricalequipmentmanufacturers.1411
NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology is ameasurement standards laboratorywhich is a1412non-regulatoryagencyoftheUnitedStatesDepartmentofCommerce.1413
QIBA:QuantitativeImagingBiomarkersAlliance.TheQuantitativeImagingBiomarkersAlliance(QIBA)was1414organizedbyRSNAin2007touniteresearchers,healthcareprofessionalsandindustrystakeholdersinthe1415advancementofquantitativeimagingandtheuseofbiomarkersinclinicaltrialsandpractice.1416
RSNA:RadiologicalSocietyofNorthAmerica(RSNA).Aprofessionalmedicalimagingsocietywithmorethan141747,000members, includingradiologists, radiationoncologists,medicalphysicistsandalliedscientists.The1418RSNAhoststheworld’slargestannualmedicalmeeting.1419
SNMMI: Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (formerly called the Society of Nuclear1420Medicine (SNM)). A nonprofit scientific and professional organization that promotes the science,1421technologyandpracticalapplicationofnuclearmedicineandmolecularimaging.SNMMIrepresents18,0001422nuclear and molecular imaging professionals worldwide. Members include physicians, technologists,1423physicists,pharmacists,scientists,laboratoryprofessionalsandmore1424
TJC: The Joint Commission (TJC) accredits and certifies health care organizations and programs in the1425UnitedStates.1426
USP:United States Pharmacopeial Convention establisheswritten and physical (reference) standards for1427medicines,foodingredients,dietarysupplementproductsandingredientsintheU.S.1428
1429
AppendixD:Model-specificInstructionsandParameters1430
Thepresenceofspecificproductmodels/versionsinthefollowingtablesshouldnotbetakentoimplythat1431thoseproductsare fully compliantwith theQIBAProfile.ConformancewithaProfile involvesmeetinga1432varietyofrequirementsofwhichoperatingbytheseparametersisjustone.Todetermineifaproduct(and1433aspecificmodel/versionofthatproduct)iscompliant,pleaserefertotheQIBAConformanceDocumentfor1434
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:63
thatproduct.1435
D.1.ImageAcquisitionParameters1436
The following technique tables list acquisitionparameter values for specificmodels/versions that canbe1437expectedtoproducedatameetingtherequirementsofSection3.6.4('PhantomImaging').1438
Thesetechniquetablesmayhavebeenpreparedbythesubmitterofthisimagingprotocoldocument,the1439clinical trial organizer, the vendor of the equipment, and/or some other source. (Consequently, a given1440model/versionmayappearinmorethanonetable.)Thesourceislistedatthetopofeachtable.1441
Sitesusingmodels listedhereareencouragedtoconsiderusingtheseparametersforbothsimplicityand1442consistency.Sitesusingmodelsnotlistedheremaybeabletodevisetheirownacquisitionparametersthat1443resultindatameetingtherequirementsofSection3.6.4andconformtotheconsiderationsinSection4.In1444somecases,parametersetsmaybeavailableasanelectronicfilefordirectimplementationontheimaging1445platform.1446
D.2.QualityAssuranceProcedures1447
Examples of recommend quality assurance procedures are shown for specific GE, Philips, and Siemens1448PET/CTscannersinthetablesbelow.1449
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:64
Dev
ice
Freq
uenc
yPe
rfor
man
ce R
equi
rem
ent
Ope
rato
rD
aily
Sta
ffD
aily
Sta
ffD
aily
No
artif
acts
. Wat
er 0
± 4
CT
Sta
ff
Noi
se a
nd A
rtifa
cts.
O
n bo
dy p
hant
omD
aily
No
artif
acts
. Tef
lon
pin
= 89
0± 5
0 C
T W
ater
0±
4 C
TS
taff
Mon
thly
No
artif
acts
. Lar
ge A
cryl
ic p
in d
iam
eter
is
50 ±
1 m
m. A
ll 7
reso
lutio
n ho
les
visi
ble.
Fi
ve o
f the
six
low
con
trast
acu
lon
pins
de
tect
able
. Wat
er 0
±4, N
ylon
100
± 1
5,
Pol
yeth
ylen
e 75
± 1
5, T
eflo
n 10
16 ±
50,
A
cryl
ic +
140
± 15
, Lex
an +
116
± 15
Sta
ff
Adv
ance
d te
st a
s ne
eded
Wid
th a
t 50%
Max
of t
he Im
puls
e R
espo
nse
prof
ile s
houl
d be
1.4
5 m
m ±
0.
10 m
m.
Phy
sici
st/s
ervi
ce
Adv
ance
d te
st a
s ne
eded
Ave
rage
of a
lum
inim
um s
trips
with
in
tole
renc
e of
val
ues
stat
ed in
man
ual.
Phy
sici
st/s
ervi
ceS
yste
m In
itial
izat
ion
Dai
lyC
ompl
etio
n of
pro
gram
Phy
sici
st/s
ervi
ceB
asel
ine
colle
ctio
n (a
nalo
g of
fset
s of
all
phot
omul
tiplie
r cha
nnel
s)D
aily
Valu
es w
ithin
rang
e. S
ucce
ss m
essa
geS
taff
PM
T ga
in c
alib
ratio
nD
aily
All
PM
Ts c
alib
rate
d w
ithin
targ
et g
ain.
No
Faile
d m
essa
ge.
Sta
ff
Ene
rgy
test
and
ana
lysi
sD
aily
Ene
rgy
cent
roid
s ap
prox
imat
ely
100.
FW
HM
< F
WH
M th
resh
old.
Sta
ff
Tim
ing
test
Dai
lyA
gree
men
t with
sys
tem
tim
ing
agai
nst t
he
calib
ratio
n se
tting
sS
taff
Em
issi
on s
inog
ram
col
lect
ion
and
anal
ysis
Dai
lyS
taff
Aut
omat
ed S
yste
m In
itial
izat
ion
Dai
ly, p
resc
hedu
led
to s
horte
n da
ily Q
CC
ompl
etio
n of
pro
gram
Sta
ffA
utom
ated
Bas
elin
e co
llect
ion
Dai
ly, p
resc
hedu
led
to s
horte
n da
ily Q
CVa
lues
with
in ra
nge.
Sta
ffU
nifo
rmity
che
ckM
onth
lyvi
sual
ly in
spec
t for
non
uni
form
ities
Sta
ff
SU
V c
alib
ratio
nE
very
6 m
onth
s, a
fter r
ecal
ibra
tion,
whe
n S
UV
val
idat
ion
show
s di
scre
panc
yN
o w
arni
ng m
essa
ge fo
r cal
gen
prog
ram
Sta
ffS
UV
val
idat
ion
Eve
ry 2
mon
ths,
whe
n P
M is
per
form
edR
OI a
vera
ge s
houl
d be
1.0
(0.9
- 1.
1).
Sta
ff, s
ervi
ce
Impu
lse
Res
pons
e
Slic
e th
ickn
ess
CT
PE
T
QA
proc
edur
es a
nd s
ched
ules
for P
hilip
s G
emin
i TF,
V3.
3 an
d V3
.4Q
A Pr
oced
ure
Dai
ly P
ET
CT
Aut
oQC
Tube
Cal
ibra
tion
Air
Cal
ibra
tion
Noi
se. O
n he
ad p
hant
om
Con
trast
sca
le a
nd a
rtifa
cts
1450
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:65
Dev
ice
Freq
uenc
yPe
rfor
man
ce R
equi
rem
ent
Ope
rato
rC
ompu
ters
Dai
ly o
r as
need
edN
/ALo
cal S
taff
Dai
ly o
r afte
r 2 h
ours
of i
nact
ivity
N/A
Loca
l Sta
ffD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ff
Con
trast
Sca
leA
cqui
re s
cans
dai
lyTh
e di
ffere
nce
in C
T nu
mbe
rs b
etw
een
the
Ple
xigl
as re
solu
tion
bloc
k an
d w
ater
= 1
20,
varia
tion
10%
Loca
l Sta
ff
Hig
h C
ontra
st S
patia
l Res
olut
ion
Acq
uire
sca
ns d
aily
The
stan
dard
dev
iatio
n fo
r an
RO
I in
the
1.6m
m b
ar p
atte
rn s
houl
d eq
ual 3
7 ±
4 fo
r th
e st
anda
rd a
lgor
ithm
Loca
l Sta
ff
Low
Con
trast
Det
ecta
bilit
yA
cqui
re s
cans
dai
lyLo
cal S
taff
Noi
se a
nd U
nifo
rmity
Acq
uire
sca
ns d
aily
CT
num
ber f
or w
ater
of 0
± 3
HU
for t
he
cent
er R
OI.
The
unifo
rmity
diff
eren
ce
betw
een
the
Cen
ter R
OI a
nd th
e av
erag
e of
the
edge
RO
Is s
houl
d be
0 ±
3 fo
r Sm
all
Bod
y (0
± 1
0 m
axim
um d
evia
tion
if La
rge
Bod
y is
use
d). N
oise
in th
e ce
nter
of t
he
imag
e to
app
roxi
mat
ely
equa
l 4.3
± 0
.5.
Loca
l Sta
ff
Slic
e Th
ickn
ess
Acq
uire
sca
ns d
aily
Slic
e th
ickn
ess
shou
ld n
ot v
ary
by m
ore
than
± 1
mm
from
the
expe
cted
val
ueLo
cal S
taff
Lase
r Lig
ht A
ccur
acy
Acq
uire
sca
ns d
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffA
fter t
ube
repl
acem
ent o
r as
PM
Ser
vice
Coi
ncid
ence
Dai
lyLo
cal S
taff
PE
T co
inci
denc
e m
ean
Dai
lyLo
cal S
taff
PE
T co
inci
denc
e va
rianc
eD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffS
ingl
esD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffP
ET
sing
les
mea
nD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffP
ET
sing
les
varia
nce
Dai
lyLo
cal S
taff
Dea
dtim
eD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffP
ET
mea
n de
adtim
eD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffTi
min
gD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ffP
ET
timin
g m
ean
Dai
lyLo
cal S
taff
Ene
rgy
Dai
lyLo
cal S
taff
PE
T en
ergy
shi
ftD
aily
Loca
l Sta
ff
Wee
kly
Con
trast
val
ue fo
r a 3
mm
obj
ect i
s le
ss
than
5 H
U. T
ypic
al v
aria
tion
is ±
0.5
HU
.Lo
cal S
taff
Wee
kly
Loca
l Sta
ffQ
uarte
rly (i
f app
ropr
iate
for t
he s
yste
m)
Loca
l Sta
ffQ
uarte
rly (i
f app
ropr
iate
for t
he s
yste
m)
Loca
l Sta
ffQ
uarte
rlyLo
cal S
taff
Qua
rterly
Loca
l Sta
ffE
very
18
mon
ths
Ser
vice
QA
proc
edur
es a
nd s
ched
ules
for G
E D
isco
very
ST,
STE
, Rx
and
Dis
cove
ry 6
00/7
00 s
erie
s PE
T/C
T sy
stem
s
CT
PE
T
Est
ablis
h ne
w D
QA
base
line
Ge-
68 s
ourc
e pi
n re
plac
emen
t
Full
syst
em c
alib
ratio
n
Gen
erat
or c
alib
ratio
ns
Cle
an d
atab
ase
PE
T 2D
nor
mal
izat
ion
PE
T 2D
wel
l cou
nter
cor
rect
ion
PE
T 3D
nor
mal
izat
ion
and
wel
l cou
nter
cor
rect
ion
CT
QA
phan
tom
PE
T D
aily
Qua
lity
Ass
uran
ce
(DQ
A)
QA
Proc
edur
e
PE
T si
ngle
s up
date
gai
n
Air
calib
ratio
ns (f
ast c
als)
CT
tube
war
m u
pS
yste
m re
boot
1451
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:66
Dev
ice
Freq
uenc
yPe
rfor
man
ce R
equi
rem
ent
Ope
rato
rD
aily
at
Sta
rtu
pN
/AS
taff
Da
ilyN
/AS
taff
Fo
ur
tim
es d
aily
N/A
Sta
ffD
aily
N/A
Sta
ffW
ee
kly
N/A
Sta
ffC
T
Ch
ecku
p/C
alib
ratio
nD
aily
, a
fte
r 6
0 m
inu
tes o
f fu
ll lo
ad
, w
ith
in 1
ho
ur
of
pa
tie
nt
sca
nS
taff
Wa
ter
HU
Da
ilyR
esu
lts s
tate
d a
s "
in t
ole
ran
ce
" W
ate
r H
U =
0 +
/- 4
Sta
ffP
ixe
l n
ois
eD
aily
Re
su
lts s
tate
d a
s "
in t
ole
ran
ce
"S
taff
Tu
be
vo
lta
ge
sD
aily
Re
su
lts s
tate
d a
s "
in t
ole
ran
ce
"S
taff
Da
ily n
orm
aliz
atio
nD
aily
Da
ily v
s.
sta
nd
ard
ch
i-sq
ua
re <
10
, n
o p
att
ern
s o
r a
rtifa
cts
Sta
ffC
om
pu
tatio
n/
ve
rifica
tio
n o
f th
e P
ET
ca
libra
tio
n
facto
r (E
CF
)D
aily
Pa
ss/f
ail
co
mp
ariso
n a
ga
inst
exp
ecte
d s
ca
nn
er
min
/me
an
/ma
xS
taff
No
rma
liza
tio
n r
esu
lts d
isp
lay a
nd
sin
og
ram
in
sp
ectio
nD
aily
No
vis
ua
l a
rtifa
cts
or
un
usu
al
pa
tte
rns
Sta
ffS
yste
m q
ua
lity r
ep
ort
Da
ilyP
ass/f
ail
Sta
ffP
art
ial d
ete
cto
r se
tup
: g
en
era
te c
rysta
l re
gio
n
ma
ps/e
ne
rgy p
rofile
sW
ee
kly
Pa
ss/f
ail
Sta
ffF
ull
de
tecto
r se
tup
an
d t
ime
alig
nm
en
tQ
ua
rte
rly
Pa
ss/f
ail
Sta
ffC
alc
ula
te t
he
Cro
ss C
alib
ratio
n C
orr
ectio
n F
acto
rW
he
n G
e-6
8 p
ha
nto
ms a
re r
ep
lace
dS
taff
Re
ca
libra
te t
he
cu
rre
nt
Ge
-68
ph
an
tom
an
d E
CF
Wh
en
Ge
-68
ph
an
tom
s a
re r
ep
lace
dS
taff
No
rma
lize
an
d c
alib
rate
th
e s
ca
nn
er
Wh
en
Ge
-68
ph
an
tom
s a
re r
ep
lace
dS
taff
CT
CT
co
nsta
ncy a
nd
M
on
thly
as p
art
of
ma
inte
na
nce
pla
nS
erv
ice
Cle
ar
ne
two
rk,
loca
l, a
nd
film
qu
eu
es
Arc
hiv
e p
atie
nt
da
taS
yste
m c
lea
nu
p/d
efr
ag
me
nta
tio
n
PE
T
PE
T D
aily
QC
Sca
nn
er
cro
ss
ca
libra
tio
n
QA
pro
cedu
res
and
sche
dule
s fo
r Sie
men
s B
iogr
aph
6/16
Hi-R
ez, B
iogr
aph
16 T
ruep
oint
, Bio
grap
h 16
Tru
epoi
nt w
ith T
rueV
, PET
Syn
go 2
010A
, Bio
grap
h m
CT
Co
mp
ute
rs
CT
Re
sta
rt c
om
pu
ters
Cle
ar
sch
ed
ule
r
QA
Pro
cedu
re
CT
Qu
alit
y
1452
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:67
AppendixE:DataFieldstobeRecordedintheCommonDataFormat1453
Mechanism1454
Thelistbelowcomprisesmeta-information(i.e.inadditiontoimagevaluesofkBq/ml)thatisnecessaryfor1455quantitativelyaccurate(i.e.knownandminimaluncertainties)ofPETSUVs.Theintenthereistolistwhat1456information should be captured rather than the mechanism itself. The format and corresponding1457mechanismofdatacapture/presentationiscurrentlyunspecified,butrangesfrompapernotes,toscanned1458forms or electronic data records, to direct entry from the measurement equipment (i.e., the PET/CT1459scanner or auxiliary measurement devices such as the dose calibrator) into pre-specified DICOM fields.1460Ideally all of the specified meta-data will be captured by direct electronic entry to DICOM fields, after1461suitablemodificationoftheDICOMformatforPETimaging.1462
Theconceptendorsedhereisthattheneededmeta-dataisidentified.ThroughrevisionsofthisProfile,the1463DICOMstandard,and technology themeta-data is inserted into theanalysis stream (Figure3) inamore1464directmannerandtechnologyandacceptedstandardsevolve.1465
• The needed information, where feasible, is listed in order from least frequently changing to most1466frequentlychanging.1467
• In all cases notewhethermeasurements aremadedirectly or estimated. If the latter case, note the1468sourceof information and thedate and time (e.g. if subject cannot bemoved frombed tomeasure1469weightorheight).1470
Datafieldstoberecorded:1471
1. Sitespecific1472a. Siteinformation(includenameand/orotheridentifiers)1473b. Scannermakeandmodel1474c. HardwareVersionnumbers1475d. SoftwareVersionnumbers1476e. Confirmationthatscannerusedwaspreviouslyqualified(ornot)1477
2. Protocolspecific1478a. PET1479
i. Durationperbed1480ii. Bedoverlap1481iii. Acquisitionmode(2Dor3D)1482iv. Reconstructionmethod1483
b. CTtechnique14843. ScannerspecificQA/QC1485
a. Mostrecentcalibrationfactors(scanner)1486b. Scannerdailycheckvalues1487c. mostrecentclockcheck1488d. mostrecentscannerQA/QC1489
4. Subjectexamspecific1490a. Height1491b. Weight1492c. Fastingtimeassessment1493d. Bloodglucoseconcentrationandtimeofsampling1494e. Pre-andpost-injectionassayedactivitiesandtimesofassay1495
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:68
f. Injectiontime1496g. Siteofinjection(andassessmentofinfiltration)1497h. Netinjectedactivity(calculatedincludingdecaycorrection)1498i. Uptaketime1499
AppendixF:TestingPET/CTDisplayandAnalysisSystemswiththeFDG-PET/CT1500
DigitalReferenceObject1501
ThePET/CTDigitalReferenceObject(DRO)isasyntheticallygeneratedsetofDICOMimagefilesofknown1502voxel values for positron emission tomography (PET) and x-ray computed tomography (CT). The PET/CT1503DROisintendedtotestthecomputationofstandardizeduptakevalues(SUVs)byPET/CTdisplaystations.It1504isalsointendedtotestregionofinterest(ROI)calculationsandalignmentbetweenthePETandCTimages.1505This ismotivatedbyvendor-specificvariations inPETDICOMformatsusedforSUVs.Thedevelopmentof1506thePET/CTDROissupportedbytheQuantitativeImagingBiomarkerAlliance(QIBA).1507
TheprimarygoalsandobjectivesofthePET/CTDigitalReferenceObjectaretosupporttheQIBAFDG-PET1508'TechnicalValidation'effortsforProfiledevelopment.Thiswillbedoneby(1)evaluationandvalidationof1509SUV calculations in PET images, (2) evaluation and validation of ROI calculations and (3) providing a1510common reference standard that can be adopted and modified by PET/CT scanner and display station1511manufacturers.1512
ThePETandCT componentsof the Imagesof theDROareeachasetofDICOMformatfiles,onefileper image slice. Each set of files are typicallygrouped as a stack to form an image volume.Representative sections through the CT and PETimagevolumesareshownbelow.The synthetic test object is based on, but is notidentical to, the NEMANU-2 PET test phantom [JNuclMed,vol.43no.101398-1409,2002].ThePETobjecthasadded'testvoxels'togetherwith2Dand3D 'testpatterns'. Ineachobject, the thicknessoftheexteriorshellis3mm,thethicknessofthehotspherewallsis1mm,andthethicknessofthelung insertwallis2mm.1513
1514
The CT DRO showing Hounsfield The PET DRO with the SUVbw
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:69
Unitsforeachstructure. valuesofeachstructure.
Image fusion of the CT and PETDROsshowingperfectalignment
Coronal view of the PET DROshowing the 2D test pattern inslice40 (left) aswell as the3Dcubictestpattern(right)
1515
StructureoftheCTandPETDROs.1516
TheCTObject1517
The CT object is 512 × 512 × 110 voxels, and is stored in 110DICOM files named 000001.dcm through1518000110.dcm,numericallyorderedsothat000001.dcmcorrespondstoslice1intheimagevolume.1519
The CT object has a reconstruction diameter of 500millimeters and an axial extent of 220millimeters,1520resultinginavoxelsizeof500/512×500/512×2(0.9765625×0.9765625×2.0)millimeters3.1521
The interior of the phantom body and the interiors of the hot spheres have voxels with values of 01522HounsfieldUnits (HU), simulatingwater in thebodyand the interiorof thehotspheres.Theshellof the1523body,lunginsertwall,andhotspherewallshavevoxelssetto120HU,simulatingpolymethylmethacrylate.1524Thevoxels interiortothelunginsertaresetto-650HU,simulatinglungattenuationmaterial.Thevoxels1525exteriorofthephantombodyaresetto-1000HU,simulatingair.Thesevaluesareindicatedintheabove1526figure.NOTE:Partialvolumeeffectswillalterthevoxelvaluesnearthebordersofdifferentregions.1527
1528
ThePETObject1529
The PET object consists of a 256 × 256 × 110 voxel image volume stored in 110 DICOM files named1530000001.dcmthrough000110.dcm,similartotheCTobjectdescribedabove.1531
ThePETobjecthas a reconstructiondiameterof 500millimeters andanaxial extentof 220millimeters,1532resultinginavoxelsizeof500/256×500/256×2(1.953125×1.953125×2.0)millimeters3.1533
ThevoxelsinteriortothephantombodyaresettoanSUVvalueof1.00.Thevoxelsinteriortothesixhot1534spheresaresettoanSUVbwvalueof4.00.Thevoxelscorrespondingtothepolymethylmethacrylateshell1535andtheexteriorof thephantombodyand interior to the lung insertareset toanSUVbwvalueof0.00.1536NOTE:Partialvolumeeffectswillalterthevoxelvaluesnearthebordersofdifferentregions.1537
Therearetwotestvoxelsinslice40oftheDRO.Thetestvoxelfurthestfromthelargesthotsphereinslice153840issettoanSUVbwvalueof4.11.Thetestvoxelclosesttothelargesthotsphereinslice40issettoan1539SUVbwvalueof-0.11.NOTE:Thereisnopolymethylmethacrylateshellsurroundingthetestvoxels inthe1540PETobject, andnopartial volumeeffects surrounding the test voxels. An SUV less than zero is possible1541whenusingPETimagereconstructionmethodssuchasanalyticfilteredbackprojection.1542
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:70
TherearetwotestpatternsinthePETDRO,asquare(2D)checkerboardpatterninslice40,andacubic(3D)1543checkerboard pattern centered in slice 40. The 3D cubic test pattern appears closest to the largest hot1544sphereinanaxialviewofslice40.1545
EachtestpatternconsistsofacheckerboardofvoxelswithalternatingSUVbwvaluesof0.10and0.90Both1546the2Dsquareand3Dcubictestpatternshaveedgemeasurementsof40mm.TheSUVbwvaluesofeach1547regionofthePETDROareshownintheabovefigure.1548
Usersof theDROareasked todownload thepackage, import thePETandCTobjects into their viewing1549software,performregionofinterest(ROI)analyses,andsubmittheresultsbacktothiswebsite.1550
1551
Procedure1552
UsersoftheDigitalReferenceObjectarerequestedto:1553
1.DownloadtheDRO(orimportfromCD)andtheuserreportform.1554
2.VerifytheDROfilesarepresent.1555
3.ImporttheDROintotheviewingsoftware.1556
4.PerformROIanalysisoftheDRO.1557
5.Submitthecompletedreportandstoreacopylocally.1558
1559
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:71
ReportForm-Page11560
1561
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:72
ReportForm-Page21562
1563
15641565
AppendixG:Vendor-neutralPseudo-codesforSUVCalculation1566
G.1Genericversion1567
This appendix contains the consensus opinion on the generic form of SUV calculation from PET DICOM1568images.Agenericpseudo-codeisusedwith"//"signifyingthebeginningofacommentfieldtotheendof1569theline.ThisversionassumesthePETIODisbeingusedandnottheEnhancedPETIOD:unitsareBQML,no1570privatedataelementsrequired,seriestimeisOK.UpdatedasofSeptember28,2012.Themostuptodate1571version is maintained on the QIBA FDG-PET Wiki page1572(http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=Standardized_Uptake_Value_SUV).Notethatthisisbasedonour1573mostcompleteunderstandingatthistime,butrequirescarefulvalidationifimplemented.Inparticular,itis1574stronglyrecommendednottouseSeriesDateandSeriesTimefordecaycorrection.1575//SUVcannotbecalculatedifanyofthespecifiedDICOMattributesaremissingoremptyorzero1576ifCorrectedImage(0x0028,0x0051)containsATTNandDECAYandDecayCorrection(0x0054,0x1102)isSTART{1577
ifUnits(0x0054,0x1001)areBQML{1578halflife=RadionuclideHalfLife(0x0018,0x1075)inRadiopharmaceuticalInformationSequence(0x0054,0x0016)//seconds1579
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:73
ifSeriesDate(0x0008,0x0021)andTime(0x0008,0x0031)arenotafterAcquisitionDate(0x0008,0x0022)andTime(0x0008,0x0032){1580 scanDateandTime=SeriesDateandTime1581
startTime=RadiopharmaceuticalStartTime(0x0018,0x1072)inRadiopharmaceuticalInformationSequence(0x0054,0x0016)1582//startDateisnotexplicit…assumesameasSeriesDate;butconsiderspanningmidnight1583decayTime=scanTime–startTime //seconds1584//RadionuclideTotalDoseisNOTcorrectedforresidualdoseinsyringe,whichisignoredhere…1585injectedDose=RadionuclideTotalDose(0x0018,0x1074)inRadiopharmaceuticalInformationSequence(0x0054,0x0016)//Bq1586decayedDose=injectedDose*pow(2,-decayTime/halflife)1587weight=Patient'sWeight(0x0010,0x1030) //inkg1588SUVbwScaleFactor=(weight*1000/decayedDose)1589//RescaleInterceptisrequiredtobe0forPET,butuseitjustincase1590//Rescaleslopemayvaryperslice(GE),andcannotbeassumedtobeconstantfortheentirevolume1591SUVbw=(storedpixelvalueinPixelData(0x7FE0,0x0010)+RescaleIntercept(0x0028,0x1052))*RescaleSlope(0x0028,0x1053)1592
*SUVbwScaleFactor //g/ml1593}1594
}1595}1596
1597
G.2Robustversion1598
ThisappendixcontainstheconsensusopiniononthemostrobustformofSUVcalculationfromPETDICOM1599images.UpdatedasofSeptember28,2012.ThemostuptodateversionismaintainedontheQIBAFDG-1600PETWikipage (http://qibawiki.rsna.org/index.php?title=Standardized_Uptake_Value_SUV).Note that this1601isbasedonourmostcompleteunderstandingatthistime,butrequirescarefulvalidationifimplemented.1602Inparticular,itisstronglyrecommendednottouseSeriesDateandSeriesTimefordecaycorrection.1603
1604//SUVcannotbecalculatedifanyofthespecifiedDICOMattributesaremissingoremptyorzero1605ifCorrectedImage(0x0028,0x0051)containsATTNandDECAYandDecayCorrection(0x0054,0x1102)isSTART{1606
ifUnits(0x0054,0x1001)areBQML{1607halflife=RadionuclideHalfLife(0x0018,0x1075)inRadiopharmaceuticalInformationSequence(0x0054,0x0016)//seconds1608ifSeriesDate(0x0008,0x0021)andTime(0x0008,0x0031)arenotafterAcquisitionDate(0x0008,0x0022)andTime(0x0008,0x0032){1609
scanDateandTime=SeriesDateandTime1610 }1611 else{ //maybepost-processedseriesinwhichSeriesDateandTimearedateofseriescreationunrelatedtoacquisition1612 ifGEprivatescanDateandTime(0x0009,0x100d,“GEMS_PETD_01”)present{1613
scanDateandTime=GEprivatescanDateandTime(0x0009,0x100d,“GEMS_PETD_01”)1614}1615else{1616
//elsemaybeSiemensserieswithalteredSeriesDateandTime1617//eithercheckearliestofallimagesinseries(forallbedpositions)(wrongforcaseofPETsyngo3.xmulti-injection)1618scanDateandTime=earliestAcquisitionDate(0x0008,0x0022)andTime(0x0008,0x0032)inallimagesofseries1619
or1620//backcomputefromcenter(averagecountrate)oftimewindowforbedposition(frame)inseries(reliableinall1621
cases)1622
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:74
//AcquisitionDate(0x0008,0x0022)andTime(0x0008,0x0032)arethestartofthebedposition(frame)1623//FrameReferenceTime(0x0054,0x1300)istheoffset(ms)fromthescanDateandTimewewanttotheaverage1624
countratetime1625if(FrameReferenceTime(0x0054,0x1300)>0&&ActualFrameDuration(0018,1242)>0){1626
frameduration=ActualFrameDuration(0018,1242)/1000 //DICOMisinms;wantseconds1627decayconstant=ln(2)/halflife1628decayduringframe=decayconstant*frameduration1629averagecountratetimewithinframe=1/decayconstant*ln(decayduringframe/(1–exp(-decayduring1630
frame)))1631scanDateandTime=AcquisitionDate(0x0008,0x0022)andTime(0x0008,0x0032)1632
- FrameReferenceTime(0x0054,0x1300)/1000+averagecountratetimewithinframe1633
}1634}1635
}1636startTime=RadiopharmaceuticalStartTime(0x0018,0x1072)inRadiopharmaceuticalInformationSequence(0x0054,0x0016)1637//startDateisnotexplicit…assumesameasSeriesDate;butconsiderspanningmidnight1638decayTime=scanTime–startTime //seconds1639//RadionuclideTotalDoseisNOTcorrectedforresidualdoseinsyringe,whichisignoredhere…1640injectedDose=RadionuclideTotalDose(0x0018,0x1074)inRadiopharmaceuticalInformationSequence(0x0054,0x0016)//Bq1641decayedDose=injectedDose*pow(2,-decayTime/halflife)1642weight=Patient'sWeight(0x0010,0x1030) //inkg1643SUVbwScaleFactor=(weight*1000/decayedDose)1644
}1645elseifUnits(0x0054,0x1001)areCNTS{1646 SUVbwScaleFactor=Philipsprivatescalefactor(0x7053,0x1000,“PhilipsPETPrivateGroup”)1647 //if(0x7053,0x1000)notpresent,but(0x7053,0x1009)ispresent,then(0x7053,0x1009)*RescaleSlope1648
//scalespixelstoBq/ml,andproceedasifUnitsareBQML1649}1650elseifUnits(0x0054,0x1001)areGML{1651 SUVbwScaleFactor=1.0 //assumesthatGMLindicatesSUVbwinsteadofSUVlbm1652}1653
}1654//RescaleInterceptisrequiredtobe0forPET,butuseitjustincase1655//Rescaleslopemayvaryperslice(GE),andcannotbeassumedtobeconstantfortheentirevolume1656SUVbw=(storedpixelvalueinPixelData(0x7FE0,0x0010)+RescaleIntercept(0x0028,0x1052))*RescaleSlope(0x0028,0x1053)*SUVbwScaleFactor//g/ml1657
1658
AppendixH:ConsensusFormulaforComputingLean-Body-MassNormalization1659
forSUVs1660
ItisimportantthatthePETcommunityisconsistentinitscomputationofSUVLBM,particularlyinlightofthe1661recent article byWahl et al. (1) that proposes using SUVLBM as part of the PERCIST criteria to monitor1662treatmentresponse.1663
TwodifferentformulasforestimatingmaleLeanBodyMass-normalizedSUV(SUVLBM)arecurrentlybeing1664
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:75
usedinthePETcommunity.ThetwovariationsoftheformulaforestimatingLBMformalesareasfollows:1665
LBM(male)=(1.10xWeight)-128x(Weight/Height)2 [1]1666
LBM(male)=(1.10xWeight)-120x(Weight/Height)2 [2]1667
Wheretheunitsforweightarekg,andtheunitsforheightarecm.Onlyoneformulaisbeingusedforthe1668calculationoffemaleLBM(2,3):1669
LBM(female)=(1.07xWeight)-148x(Weight/Height)2 [3]1670
Bothversionsforestimatingmaleleanbodymass(equation1fromHallyncketal.(2)andequation2from1671MorganandBray(3))arebasedontheoriginalworkofJames(4),whichinturnwerederivedfromafitof1672(weight/height2)topercentagebodyfatasmeasuredbyskinfoldmeasurements.Equation1istheversion1673widelyusedbythepharmacologycommunityandcanbeconsideredthe'correct'version(5-7).1674
Thesecondversionoftheequation[2]canbetracedbacktoanarticlebyMorganandBray(3), inwhich1675theformulapresentedbyHallyncketal.(2)islikelymisquoted,sincethearticle(2)isreferencedelsewhere1676inMorganandBray(3)withoutdiscussionofthedifferenceinformulaswhere120wassubstitutedfor1281677as a coefficient. The first incorporation of this formula for computing LBM into SUV calculations was1678describedinSugawaraetal(8),whichcitestheMorganandBraypaper(3).Itisthisversionoftheformula1679formales,with120asthecoefficient,thathasbeensometimesquotedinthePETliterature.Sugawaraetal1680(8)usedonlydataforfemalepatients,whichcitestheformulaforestimatingfemaleLBMbyMorganand1681Bray(3),whichinturnmatchestheHallyncketal.(2)paper.1682
Althoughtheimpactofthisdifferenceincoefficientisrelativelyminorforpatientswithanormalbodymass1683index(BMI(kg/m2)=(weight/height2),itdoesvaryasafunctionofthepatient’sweight/heightratio.For1684example,forapatientofheight180cmandweight75kg(BMI:23)thevalueofSUVLBMascomputedbythe1685twoformulawoulddifferbylessthan1.5%forregionswithanSUVLBMof~1.However,foramalepatient1686ofthesameheightbutweighing150kg(BMI:46),thedifferenceinSUVLBMforthesameregionswouldbe1687~7%.1688
Incomparingequations[1]and[2],itisrecommendedthatequation[1]beusedinpreferencetoequation1689[2]. However, although the James (2) is themost commonly used data source for equations estimating1690LBM, it is well known that it is incorrect for extreme BMI values (5-7). Janmahasatian et. al (5) have1691proposedalternativeequationsforLBM:1692
LBM(male)(kg)= (9270xWeight)/(6680/(216xBMI)) [4]1693
LBM(female)(kg)= (9270xWeight)/(8780/(244xBMI)) [5]1694
TheserevisedformulasforLBMhaveachievedsomeacceptanceinthepharmacologycommunity(6,7),and1695futureversionsofthisProfilemayrecommendequations[4]and[5]insteadofequations[1]and[3].There1696are also continuing efforts to comeupwithmore accuratemethods for estimating LBM, through direct1697measurementonaper-patientbasisusingCT(9).However,thedifferentmethodsprovidingestimatesof1698LBMtypicallyhaveunknownlevelsofbiasandvariance.Thusconsistencyandstandardizationarelikelyto1699yieldlargerimprovementsinstudypowerforclinicaltrials,whencomparedtopotentialimprovementsin1700accuracyofLBMestimation.1701
References1702
1.Wahl,R.,Heather,J.,Kasamon,Y.,Lodge,M.(2009)FromRECISTtoPERCIST:EvolvingConsiderationsfor1703PETResponseCriteriainSolidTumours.JNM50(5);122S-150S.1704
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:76
2.HallynckTH,SoepHH,ThomisJA,BoelaertJ,DaneelsR,DettliL.(1981)Shouldclearancebenormalized1705tobodysurfaceorleanbodymass.BrJclinPharmac11:523-526.1706
3.Morgan,D.,BrayK.(1994)LeanBodyMassasapredictorofdrugdosage:ImplicationsforDrugTherapy.1707ClinicalPharmacokinetics26(4);292-307.1708
4.James,W.(1976)ResearchonObesity.London.HerMajesty’sStationaryOffice.1709
5.JanmahasatianS,DuffullSB,AshS,WardLC,ByrneNM,GreenB.Quantificationofleanbodyweight.Clin1710Pharmacokinet44(10):1051-1065,2005.PMID:16176118.1711
6.HanPY,DuffullSB,KirkpatrickCM,GreenB.Dosing inobesity:asimplesolutiontoabigproblem.Clin1712PharmacolTher82(5):505-508,2007.PMID:17952107.1713
7.HanleyMJ,AbernethyDR,GreenblattDJ.Effectofobesityonthepharmacokineticsofdrugsinhumans.1714ClinPharmacokinet49(2):71-87,2010.PMID:20067334.1715
8.Sugawara,Y.,Zasadny,K.,Neuhoff,A.,Wahl,R.(1999)ReevaluationoftheSUVforFDG:Variationswith1716bodyweightandmethodsforcorrection.Radiology213;521-525.1717
9. Chan T. Computerizedmethod for automatic evaluation of lean bodymass from PET/CT: comparison1718withpredictiveequations.JNuclMed53(1):130-137,2012.PMID:22128325.1719
1720
AppendixI:QIBAFDGPET/CTImagingSiteandScannerChecklists1721
1722
QIBAFDGPET/CTImagingSite1723
ThefollowingchecklistmaybeusedtoascertainaPETimagingsite’squalificationforquantitativeimaging1724according to theQIBA FDGPET/CT profile. Answersmay be provided either as “current practice” or as1725“feasible”,dependingonthecontext,but itshouldbemadeclearbothwhichwasexpectedandhowthe1726siteanswered.1727
1728
SiteandPersonnelQualifications
1. Thesiteisaccredited(ACR,IAC,TJC,etc.)orhasQualifiedstatusforclinicaltrials(ECOG-ACRIN,SNMMI-CTN,EARL,CROs,etc.)
__yes__no
2. Thesitehasthesupportoftechnologists,physicists,andphysiciansexperiencedintheuseofFDG-PET/CT,andmeetingthequalificationsdescribedbelow.
__yes__no
3. Technologists:PETstudiesareperformedbytechnologistswhosecertificationisequivalenttotherecommendationspublishedbytherepresentativesfromtheSocietyofNuclearMedicineTechnologistsSection(SNMTS)ortheAmericanSocietyofRadiologicTechnologists(ASRT)andshouldalsomeetalllocal,regional,andnationalregulatoryrequirementsfortheadministrationofionizingradiationtopatients.
__yes__no
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:77
4. Physicists:ThemedicalphysicistiscertifiedinMedicalNuclearPhysicsorRadiologicalPhysicsbytheAmericanBoardofRadiology(ABR);inNuclearMedicinePhysicsbytheAmericanBoardofScienceinNuclearMedicine(ABSNM);inNuclearMedicinePhysicsbytheCanadianCollegeofPhysicistsinMedicine;orequivalentcertificationinothercountries;orhave3yearsofPETexperience.Regardlessofcertification,thephysicistshouldhavespecificexperienceinPETanditsquantitativeuse.
__yes__no
5. PhysiciansoverseeingandinterpretingPET/CTscansarequalifiedbytheABR(Diagnosticand/orNuclearRadiology)orAmericanBoardofNuclearMedicine(ABNM)orequivalentwithintheUnitedStatesoranequivalententityappropriateforthegeographiclocationinwhichtheimagingstudy(ies)willbeperformedand/orinterpreted.
__yes__no
ImagingProcedures
6. PatientheightandweightareenteredintoscannerduringPET/CTacquisition. __yes__no
7. Bloodglucoseismeasuredforeachpatientwithin2hoursprecedingFDGadministration.Measuredvalueandmeasurementtimearedocumented.
__yes__no
8. Ifandwhenglucosethresholdisexceeded,thereasonshallbedocumented. __yes__no
9. Foreachpatient,thepre-injectionFDGactivityismeasuredandinjectedandresidualactivityismeasured.Initialandresidualmeasurementtimesandinjectiontimeareenteredintotheconsole.
__yes__no
10. FDGisadministeredthrougha24-gaugeorlargerindwellingcatheterplacedanatomicallyremotetoanysitesofsuspectedpathology,preferablyinanantecubitalvein.Intravenousportsshouldnotbeused,unlessnoothervenousaccessisavailable.
Inthecaseofmanualadministration,athree-wayvalvesystemshouldbeattachedtotheintravenouscannulasoastoallowatleasta10ccnormal(0.9%NaCl)salineflushfollowingFDGinjection.Forautomatedinjectiondevicesalternateflushingmechanismsareallowed.
__yes__no
11. Forfollow-upscans,patientsareimagedwiththesameworkflow(i.e.patienthandling,imagingacquisition,imageprocessing,andimageanalysis)asforbaselinescans.
__yes__no
12. TheFDGuptaketime(frominjectiontoscan)is60minutes,withanacceptablerangeof55-75minutes.Whenrepeatingascanonthesamesubject,uptaketimeforthe2ndscaniswithin10minutesofthatforthefirstscan.
__yes__no
13. IfthepatientisobservedtotakeadeepbreathduringtheCTscanitisdocumentedandarepeatCTstudyisconsidered.
__yes__no
14. Whenapatientisrescanned,thesamescandirectionisused. __yes__no
15. ReconstructedPETimages,withandwithoutattenuationcorrection,andCTimagesarearchivedattheimagingsite.
__yes__no
QA/QC
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:78
16. ThesiteperformsallPET/CTscannerQA/QCproceduresrecommendedbythemanufacturerandattherecommendedfrequency(e.g.,daily,weekly,quarterly)andassuresthattheoutputvaluesareacceptable.
__yes__no
17. DailyQAproceduresareperformedpriortoanysubjectscan. __yes__no
18. Awaterorwater-equivalentphantomisscannedandevaluateddailyandacceptableoutputisensured.
__yes__no
19. DosecalibratorconstancyisevaluateddailyontheF-18setting.Day-to-daydifferencesnogreaterthan2.5%areallowed.Cs-137,Co-57,orsimulatedF-18maybeused.
__yes__no
20. Thedosecalibratoraccuracyisevaluatedmonthlywithmeasuredvaluesdifferingnomorethan2.5%fromtheactualsourcevalue.Cs-137,Co-57,orsimulatedF-18maybeused.
__yes__no
21. Dosecalibratorlinearityisassessedatleastannuallyoverarangeof37-1110MBq,withdeviationofnomorethan2.5%overtheentirerange.
__yes__no
22. Scalesforpatientweightmeasurementareevaluatedannuallyorafteranyrepairbyqualifiedpersonnel,witherrornomorethan2.5%fromexpectedvaluesusingaNIST-traceableorequivalentstandard.
__yes__no
23. TheglucosemeasuringdeviceismeasuredandtestedaccordingtoaCLIA-approved,CLIA-cleared,orequivalent(ifoutsidetheUnitedState)procedure.
__yes__no
24. ThePET/CTscannercomputerandallclocksintheimagingfacilityusedtorecordactivity/injectionmeasurementsaresynchronizedtostandardtimereferencewithin+/-1minute.
SynchronizationofallclocksusedintheconductoftheFDG-PET/CTstudyischeckedweeklyandafterpoweroutagesorcivilchangesforDaylightSavings(NorthAmerica)orSummerTime(Europe).
__yes__no
25. QuantitativeCalibrationAccuracy:PETscannerquantitativeaccuracyrelativetothedosecalibratorisverifiedquarterlyandafterscannerupgrades,maintenanceorrepairs,newsetupsandmodificationstothedosecalibratorviaauniformphantomscanofactivitymeasuredinthedosecalibrator,achievingalargecentralROImeanSUVvalueof1.0(acceptablerange0.9-1.1).
__yes__no
26. AxialUniformity:Usingauniformcylinderphantomorequivalentshallobtainaslice-to-slicevariabilityoflessthan10%forthesliceswithinthecentral80%oftheaxialFOV.
__yes__no
27. PETResolution:Coldrods(asintheJaszczakorACRPETphantoms)ofdiameter9.5mmorsmallermustbevisible.Ahotcylinder(asintheACRPETphantom)of12mmorsmallermustbevisibleORthe13mmsphereoftheNEMAimagequalityphantommustbevisible.
__yes__no
28. PETnoise:Inauniformphantomof0.1to0.2µCi/mlF-18concentrationthecoefficientofvariationofvoxelvalueswithinarectangularorcircularregionofatleast3cm(sideordiameter)mustbenogreaterthan15%forallsliceswithinthecentral80%oftheaxialFOV.
__yes__no
SpecificPersonnelResponsibilities
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:79
29. Atechnologistorphysicistassessesuniformity(within-planeandacrossslices)andcompareswithpreviousresults.Quarterlyandfollowingsoftwareupgrades.
__yes__no
30. AtechnologistorphysicistshallperformtheQuantitativeCalibrationAccuracytest.Quarterlyandfollowingsoftwareupgradesorchangestothedosecalibrator
__yes__no
31. Aphysicistshallperformanddocumentperformanceofaquantitativeassessment(usingaphantomwithdifferingsizedefinedtargetssuchastheACRorNEMAIQphantomsprocessedwithroutineimagereconstructionprotocols)forlesionresolution.Annually.
__yes__no
32. AphysicistShallperformaquantitativeassessmentofimagenoiseinphantomimagestobeofconsistentandacceptablequality.Annually.
__yes__no
1729
1730
QIBAFDGPET/CTScannerChecklist1731
Thefollowingquestionnaire/checklistmaybeusedtoascertainaPETscanner’squalificationfor1732quantitativeimagingaccordingtotheQIBAFDGPET/CTProfile.1733
1734 Parameter Specification Pass?
1. Calibrationfactors
AllnecessarycalibrationfactorsneededtooutputPETimagesinunitsofBq/mlshallbeautomaticallyappliedduringtheimagereconstructionprocess.
2. PETScannercalibration
Shallbeabletobecalibratedaccordingtothefollowingspecifications:UsingauniformcylindercontainingF-18inwatersolution(ideallyusingthesamesolutionusedfordosecalibratorcross-calibration)
Slice-to-slicevariabilityshallbenomorethan±5%(notincludingendslices,asperACRPETCoreLab).
3. Weight Shallbeabletorecordpatientweightinlborkgassuppliedfromthemodalityworklistoroperatorentryintoscannerinterface.ShallbestoredinPatientWeightfield(0010,1030)intheDICOMimageheader,asperDICOMstandard.
4. Height Shallbeabletorecordpatientheightinfeet/inchesorcm/massuppliedfromthemodalityworklistoroperatorentryintoscannerinterface.ShallbestoredinPatientSizefield(0010,1020)intheDICOMimageheader,asperDICOMstandard.
5. AdministeredRadionuclide
Shallbeabletoentertheradionuclidetype(i.e.F-18)byoperatorentryintothescannerinterfaceandthroughpredefinedprotocol.ShallberecordedinRadionuclideCodeSequence(0054,0300)intheDICOMimageheader[e.g.(C-111A1,SRT,“18Fluorine”)].
6. AdministeredRadiotracer
Shallbeabletorecordtheradiotracer(i.e.FDG),assuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadionuclideCodeSequencefield(0054,0300)intheDICOMimageheader,e.g.(C-B1031,SRT,“FluorodeoxyglucoseF18”).
7. AdministeredRadiotracerradioactivity
Shallbeabletoentertheadministeredradioactivity,inbothMBqandmCi,assuppliedbyoperatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadionuclideTotalDosefield(0018,1074)intheDICOMimageheaderinBq.
8. Administered Shallbeabletorecordthetimeofthestartofactivityinjectionassuppliedby
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:80
RadiotracerTime
operatorentryintothescannerinterface.ShallberecordedinRadiopharmaceuticalStartDateTimefield(0018,1078)(preferred)orRadiopharmaceuticalStartTimefield(0018,1072).
9. DecayCorrectionMethodology
EncodedvoxelvalueswithRescaleSlopefield(0028,1053)appliedshallbedecay-correctedbythescannersoftware(nottheoperator)toasinglereferencetime(regardlessofbedposition),whichisthestarttimeofthefirstacquisition,whichshallbeencodedintheSeriesTimefield(0008,0031)fororiginalimages.
CorrectedImagefield(0028,0051)shallincludethevalue“DECY”andDecayCorrectionfield(0054,1102)shallbe“START”,whichmeansthattheimagesaredecay-correctedtotheearliestAcquisitionTime(0008,0032).
10. ScanningWorkflow
ShallbeabletosupportProfileProtocol(Section3)PETandCTorder(s)ofacquisition.
Shallbeabletopre-defineandsave(byimagingsite)aProfileacquisitionProtocolforpatientacquisition.
11. CTAcquisitionParameters
Shallrecordallkeyacquisitionparameters(technique)intheCTimageheader,usingstandardDICOMfields.
12. PET-CTAlignment
ShallbeabletoalignPETandCTimageswithin±2mminanydirection.
13. ActivityConcentrationintheReconstructedImages
Shallbeabletostoreandrecord(rescaled)imagedatainunitsofBq/mlanduseavalueofBQMLforUnitsfield(0054,1001).
14. TracerUptakeTime
ShallbederivablefromthedifferencebetweentheRadiopharmaceuticalDateTimefield(0018,1078)(preferred)orRadiopharmaceuticalStartTimefield(0018,1072)andtheSeriesTimefield(0008,0031)orearliestAcquisitionTimefield(0008,0032)intheseries(i.e.,thestartofacquisitionatthefirstbedposition),whichshouldbereportedasSeriesTimefield(0008,0031).
15. PETVoxelsize
SeeSection4.3(PETVoxelsize)undertheReconstructionSoftwarespecificationrequirements.
16. CTVoxelsize ShallbenogreaterthanthereconstructedPETvoxelsize.
Voxelsshallbesquareintransaxialdimensions,althougharenotrequiredtobeisotropicintheZ(head-foot)axis.
NotrequiredtobethesameasthereconstructedPETvoxelsize.
17. SubjectPositioning
ShallbeabletorecordthesubjectpositioninthePatientOrientationCodeSequencefield(0054,0410)(whetherproneorsupine)andPatientGantryRelationshipCodefieldSequence(0054,0414)(whetherheadorfeetfirst).
18. DICOMConformance
AllimagedataandscanparametersshallbetransferableusingappropriateDICOMfieldsaccordingtotheDICOMconformancestatementforthePET/CTscanner.
19. DICOMDatatransferandstorageformat
PETimagesshallbeencodedintheDICOMPETorEnhancedPETImageStorageSOPClass,usingactivity-concentrationunits(Bq/ml)withadditionalparametersstoredinpublicDICOMfieldstoenablecalculationofSUVs.
PETimagesshallbetransferredandstoredwithoutanyformoflossy
Copyright©2016:RSNA Page:81
compression.
20. Metadata ShallbeabletoaccuratelypropagatetheinformationcollectedatthepriorstagesandextenditwiththoseitemsnotedintheReconstructionsection.
21. DataCorrections
PETemissiondatamustbeabletobecorrectedforgeometricalresponseanddetectorefficiency,systemdead-time,randomcoincidences,scatterandattenuation.
22. ReconstructionMethodology
Shallbeabletoprovideimageswithoutresolutionrecovery.
23. ReconstructionMethodology/Output
Shallbeabletoperformreconstructionswithandwithoutattenuationcorrection.
24. DataReconstruction2D/3DCompatibility
Shallbeabletoperformreconstructionofdataacquiredin3Dmodeusingfully3Dimagereconstructionalgorithms.
Shallbeabletoperformreconstructionofdataacquiredin2Dmodeusing2Dimagereconstructionalgorithms.
25. Quantitativecalibration
Shallapplyappropriatequantitativecalibrationfactorssuchthatallimageshaveunitsofactivityconcentration,e.g.kBq/mL.
26. Multi-beddata
Shallcombinedatafrommultipleover-lappingbedpositions(includingappropriatedecaycorrections)soastoproduceasinglethree-dimensionalimagevolume.
27. Voxelsize Shallallowtheusertodefinetheimagevoxelsizebyadjustingthematrixdimensionsand/ordiameterofthereconstructionfield-of-view.
ShallbeabletoreconstructPETvoxelswithasize4mmorlessinallthreedimensions(asrecordedinVoxelSpacingfield(0028,0030)andcomputedfromthereconstructionintervalbetweenImagePosition(Patient)(0020,0032)valuesofsuccessiveslices).
Voxelsshallbesquareintransaxialdimensions,althoughvoxelsarenotrequiredtobeisotropicinthez(head-foot)axis.
28. Reconstructionparameters
Shallallowtheusertocontrolimagenoiseandspatialresolutionbyadjustingreconstructionparameters,e.g.numberofiterations,post-reconstructionfilters.
29. Reconstructionprotocols
Shallallowasetofreconstructionparameterstobesavedandautomaticallyapplied(withoutmanualintervention)tofuturestudiesasneeded.
1735