1 / 17 author cern – geneva – ch [email protected] 14th international magnetic measurement...
TRANSCRIPT
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 1 / 17
TitleField maps of the U17 PS magnet
Alexander ASKLÖVLinköping University
Régis Chritin CERN
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 2 / 17
PS extraction region adaptation needed for the LHC New current operation → ejection unit must be better known Effects of the metallic shims on ejected beam and circulating beam Access limitation → new bench developed
Alternated Gradient principle Combined function units (Focusing and Defocusing) C shaped magnets 10 blocks assembled, laminated total geometrical length = 4260 mm
U17 PS magnet
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 3 / 17
U17 magnet different coil schematics
Main coil
Pole face windings (pfw)
Figure-of-eight loop
Used to adjust the Tunes and Chromaticities (sextupolar component) modified by saturation
Used to change the Tune (quadrupolar component) without affecting the curvature (integrated bending field)
Combined function magnet
Main coil
Defocusing (5 blocks) Focusing (5 blocks)
Figure of eight loop
Pole face windings
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 4 / 17
PFW configuration
)(2 0
0
00 xx
xxWGxy
Gni
2
0
20
22
0
0
0
32
0 )(12)(4)
3(
2 xx
xWx
xx
WxSyx
ySni
To create pure quadrupole on hyperbolic profile:
To create pure sextupole on hyperbolic profile:
• Windings configuration and field component:
)1(2
1
0xx
Wy
gaptotalW
)1(2
1
0xx
Wy
gaptotalW
)(xni per pole = equation of equipotential
)(xni per pole = equation of equipotential
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 5 / 17
CurrentsIp I8 IpfwF IpfwD
Cycle Test 2500 A - - -
Cycle E 669.2 A - - -
Cycle C 5413.15 A 1257.9 A 200.7 A 99.75 A
Cycle LHC 5400.56 A 1452.8 A 206.7 A 86.9 A
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 6 / 17
Measurement techniques
2D Field mapping
Hall probes KSY44 (Siemens) Semiconductor mono-crystalline GaAs Low temperature dependency β = -0.036 %/°C Hall current 3mA. High sensitivity 200 V/A/T gives 600 mV/T Low noise, less than 0.2 gauss (time span 2-20min) Tiny active surface, 0.1225 mm2
Resistance - Each probe: about 900 ohm at 1 T - 11 probes connected in series- Vary with induction and thus also the Hall current
746.1
)0()( 9.1006.01
Bii HallBHall
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 7 / 17
- 11 Hall probes measured once during a power cycle → 481 ms for a scanning- 600 ms Flat-top → magnetic field not constant due to Eddy Current - 1 Hall probe measured 3 times → Eddy Current effects correction
11 Hall probes (calibrated in their fixed position)
116 mm
3 thermistors
19 mm
Hall probes assembly
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 8 / 17
Magnetic distances measurements
With the PS magnet we can measure easily the individual magnetic distances between the probes with good precision.
- Magnet gradient = 5.2 T/m @ 5400 A
→ small probe displacement = significant field change
- Heidenhain ruler → precise measurement head displacement (micron resolution)
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 9 / 17
Wanted precision
Better than 1 per mille (for the induction B) Absolute error smaller than 10 Gauss (Nominal field = 1.2 tesla (26 GeV))
Gradient 5.2 tesla/m Position precision of 0.1 mm
Other parameters Hall current, 4 pulsed power currents, temperature, time evolution, measurement equipment
(positioning errors)
The whole installation
7 m
Magnetic measurement stand which may be used to map ANY long magnet (up to 6.5 m) with closed gap (34 mm min).
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 10 / 17
Bench synoptic diagram
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 11 / 17
Kevlar thread
Encoder
Maxon motorRubber wheel Sandpaper
Molybdenum wheel
Displacement system
- Conceived to be as temperature independent as possible
- Calibrated with respect to the molybdenum wheel radius
- System based on a 7 meters long straight plastic arm
- Movement regulated by the position encoder
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 12 / 17
Procedure
Array of 11 Hall probes Scan (HP34970A + module 34901A multiplexer) 37 ms between each Hall probe measurement 3 thermistors for temperature compensation
Steps 1 cm in longitudinal direction Displacement precision. Kevlar® (-2 ppm/K) thread (diam. 0.6 mm) and
Molybdenum wheel (+5 ppm/K). ROD 450 Encoder. Maxon motor DC. 500 steps + 4 more transversal positions (5 x 10 cm) Total map with around 27500 points
Relative changes with and without magnetic shims to know their influences
® Dupont de Nemours
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 13 / 17
Temperature corrections for the probes Using β = -0.036 %/°C (linear)
Hall current corrections Using linear correction.
Hall probe calibration 15 degree polynomial as a function of the Hall tension. Real magnetic distance between each Hall probe
Position correction of the guiding rail Using laser tracker measurements
Time evolution corrections (mainly due to eddy currents) Using a second order approximation function for correction One probe measured three times on the flat top: in the beginning, the middle and
the end. For each longitudinal position
Corrections applied
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 14 / 17
Position measurements
Position corrections approximating by linear lines the non rectitude of the guiding rail.
After shims installation
Made with a Laser Tracker system
Rail movementsPosition reproducibility
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 15 / 17
Field integral under new LHC conditionsFor consecutive measurements: 6*10-5
No movement of the rail No calibration deviation
Mean absolute relative difference between first and final measurements are 5*10 -4
Rail movements during mechanical manipulations on the magnet Long term calibration deviation
Rem: the two longitudinal extremities, where the field drops quickly are neglected. The precision of the longitudinal coordinate (z) is too bad here (slipping checked with telescope < 0.4 mm).
New PFW validationMaximum position difference between old and new PFW < 0.5 mm
Magnetic shims (each block gap = 34 mm)Different radial positions between simulations and the physical installation:198 gauss field drop instead of 105 gauss estimated.
Results
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 16 / 17
With shims
Magnetic shims homogenize the field by shielding the ejected beam from a non linear fringe field different radial position of the five different shims
Shims
Magnet blocks
← Focusing side with
and without shims
AuthorCERN – Geneva – [email protected]
14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop26-29 September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland 17 / 17
Future
New field maps of U17 with 4 new PFW power supplies instead of 2, when narrow sides and wide sides will be powered independently.
Use the bench for magnets with no lateral access (6.2 meter long SPS dipoles – magnets with small gaps)
Verify measured Btrain in the PS Strong Eddy currents at the end blocks, which are not taken into account in the actual B train coils located
near the central blocks of the reference magnet.
Coils measuring the full integral, seeing the whole eddy current picture. Not very sensitive to transversal displacement (F and D halves compensate each other), but very sensitive to any yaw-angle though
Thesis report on the web (https://edms.cern.ch) EDMS document 609417 EDMS seminaire technique 609283
Measurement data G:\Divisions\AT\Groups\MTM\MTM-RM\Technical_Students\AlexanderAsklov\Measure Data
_____________________
P+ P+ ejected