07.14.15 final pc packet items 1 to 44

7/18/2019 07.14.15 FINAL PC Packet Items 1 to 44

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/071415-final-pc-packet-items-1-to-44 1/672

Planning Commission July 14, 2015 -

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

COUNCIL CHAMBERS · 495 SOUTH MAIN STREET · PHONE 229-6011

CITY OF LAS VEGAS INTERNET ADDRESS: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

LAS VEGAS CITY COUNCIL

Mayor Carolyn G. Goodman, (At-Large)

Mayor Pro-Tem Steven D. Ross, (Ward 6)

Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian, (Ward 1)

Councilman Ricki Y. Barlow (Ward 5)

Councilman Stavros S. Anthony, (Ward 4)

Councilman Bob Coffin, (Ward 3)

Councilman Bob Beers, (Ward 2)

City Manager Elizabeth N. Fretwell

COMMISSIONERS

Todd L. Moody, Chair

Trinity Haven Schlottman, Vice Chair

Vicki Quinn

Gus W. Flangas

Glen Trowbridge

Cedric Crear

Sam Cherry

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in theCouncil Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. If you need an accommodationto attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at (702) 229-6301 and advise ofyour need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.

July 14, 20156:00 PM

ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO ORMORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY BEREMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME. BACKUP MATERIAL FOR THIS AGENDAMAY BE OBTAINED FROM CHRYSTAL JACOBS, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, 333 NORTH RANCHO DRIVE, 3 RD

FLOOR, (702)-229-6301 OR ON THE CITY’S WEBPAGE AT www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

NOTICE: This meeting has been properly noticed and posted at the following locations:

City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st FloorClark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central ParkwayGrant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington AvenueCity of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

ACTIONS: ALL ACTIONS EXCEPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS, REZONINGS AND RELATED CASESTHERETO ARE FINAL UNLESS AN APPEAL IS FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR ANAGGRIEVED PERSON, OR A REVIEW IS REQUESTED BY A MEMBER OF THE CITYCOUNCIL WITHIN TEN DAYS AND PAYMENT OF THOSE COSTS SHALL BE MADE UPONFILING OF THE APPLICATION.

ANY ITEM LISTED IN THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER IF SO REQUESTEDBY THE APPLICANT, STAFF, OR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ANDAGREED TO BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE PLANNING COMMISSION MAYIMPOSE TIME LIMITATIONS, AS NECESSARY, ON THOSE PERSONS WISHING TO BEHEARD ON ANY AGENDAED ITEM.




PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation andsuggested conditions of approval, if appropriate.

2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is

complete, the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staff’s conditions ofapproval.

3. If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staff’s condition, the applicant or hisrepresentative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.

4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. Ifmore than one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak andindicate that he speaks for others in the audience who share his view.

5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard, but in the interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groupsof interested parties.

6. After all objectors’ input has been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.

7. Following the applicant’s response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst

themselves, ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps,models and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed infor the record unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We appreciateyour courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.

BUSINESS ITEMS:

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS ON THEAGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FORTHE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLESPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

5. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGOF MAY 12, 2015 AND JUNE 9, 2015.

6. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be stricken orheld in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.




CONSENT ITEMS:

CONSENT ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND MAY BE ENACTED BY ONEMOTION. HOWEVER, ANY ITEM MAY BE DISCUSSED IF A COMMISSION MEMBER OR APPLICANT SO DESIRES.

7. ABEYANCE - TMP-58507 - TENTATIVE MAP - BRISTLE HEIGHTS - APPLICANT: MOSAIC LAND, LLC -

OWNER: S I C NEVADA ONE, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 58-LOT

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 10.42 acres at the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately285 feet east of Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-002 and 003), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross)[PRJ-58401]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

8. TMP-59501 - TENTATIVE MAP - 95 & DURANGO (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -

APPLICANT/OWNER: REMINGTON COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC - For possible action on a request for a TentativeMap FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on the northwest corner of Oso Blanca Road and DurangoDrive (APN 125-17-301-012), T-C (Town Center) Zone [GC-TC (General Commercial-Town Center) Special Land UseDesignation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59484]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

9. TMP-59549 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUNNY PLACE COMMERCIAL CENTER - APPLICANT/OWNER:

DRAGON 7 HENDERSON PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.51 acres at the southwest corner of Washington Avenue and Martin L KingBoulevard (APNs 139-28-304-001, 139-28-312-001, 003 and 004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow)[PRJ-59320]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE

THE FOLLOWING ARE ITEMS THAT MAY BE CONSIDERED IN ONE MOTION/ONE VOTE. THEY ARE CONSIDEREDROUTINE NON-PUBLIC AND PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. ALL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND NON-PUBLIC HEARINGSWILL BE OPENED AT ONE TIME. ANY PERSON REPRESENTING AN APPLICATION OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLICOR A MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS AND ALLSTANDARD CONDITIONS FOR THE APPLICATION RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, SHOULD REQUEST TO HAVETHAT ITEM REMOVED FROM THIS PART OF THE AGENDA.

10. VAR-59522 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS' RX NEVADA, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF 61 FEETWHERE 85 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 5,617 SQUARE-FOOT ANIMAL HOSPITAL, CLINIC OR SHELTER (WITH NO OUTSIDE PENS) on 0.32 acres at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard (APNs 138-25-613-043, 044and 045), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59500]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

11. SUP-59316 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPTIVES FREE

CHRISTIAN CENTER - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit(U-0018-01) TO ADD A PARKING LOT at 1329 Balzar Avenue (APNs 139-21-610-340 and 341), R-2 (Medium-LowDensity Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59184]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

12. SDR-59317 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-59316 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPTIVES FREE CHRISTIAN CENTER - For possible action on a request for a SiteDevelopment Plan Review FOR A PARKING LOT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 12-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPEBUFFER ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC

RIGHT-OF-WAY on 0.24 acres at 1329 Balzar Avenue (APNs 139-21-610-340 and 341), R-2 (Medium-Low DensityResidential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59184]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

13. SUP-59482 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:WES ISBUTT - OWNER: ARTS

FACTORY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-37385) FOR A PROPOSED 5,663 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 1,385SQUARE-FOOT URBAN LOUNGE at 107 East Charleston Boulevard, Suite #155 (APNs 139-33-811-017 and 139-34-410-046), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58638]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.




14. SUP-59483 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-59482 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WES

ISBUTT - OWNER: ARTS FACTORY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR APROPOSED 23,114 SQUARE-FOOT MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT at 107 East Charleston Boulevard (APNs 139-33-811-017 and 139-34-410-046), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58638]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

15. SDR-59480 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-59482 AND SUP-59483 - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT: WES ISBUTT - OWNER: ARTS FACTORY, LLC - For possible action on a request fora Site Development Plan Review TO MODIFY THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DEVELOP A PEDESTRIANPLAZA FOR AN EXISTING URBAN LOUNGE WITH A WAIVER OF STREETSCAPE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSon 0.13 acres at 123 East Charleston Boulevard (APNs 139-33-811-017 and 139-34-410-046), C-2 (General Commercial)Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58638]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

16. SUP-59257 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: EGG & I, INC. - OWNER:SAHARA WESTLAKE ASSOCIATES - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED3,264 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITH SERVICE BAR WITH A 938 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO at4533 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #F5 (APN 162-07-101-008), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59118]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

17. SUP-59427 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: COVENANT OF LOVE

CORPORATION - OWNER: JATIN PANDIT - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A

PROPOSED 1,443 SQUARE-FOOT CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP USE at 3016 Vegas Drive (APN 139-20-414-006), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59414]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

18. SUP-59509 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GRACEFUL FACIALS &BODYWORK - OWNER: PINES OFFICE CENTER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendmentto an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-54904) TO RELOCATE AND EXPAND A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENTUSE FROM 849 SQUARE FEET TO 2,531 SQUARE FEET at 7311 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #110 (APN 163-03-501-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59117]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

19. SUP-59536 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CENTENNIAL

PROPERTY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 70 SQUARE-FOOTAUTO SMOG CHECK USE WHERE SERVICES ARE PERFORMED OUTSIDE AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE onthe north side of Azure Drive, 934 feet west of Tenaya Way (APN 125-27-113-006), TC (Town Center) Zone, [GC-

TC(General Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59382]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

20. VAC-59307 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TEN15 CRAIG TENAYA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate A DRAINAGE EASEMENT generally located adjacent to thenorthwest corner of Craig Road and U.S. 95, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59091]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

21. SDR-59306 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-59307 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: TEN15 CRAIG TENAYA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site DevelopmentPlan Review FOR THREE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 9,850 SQUARE FEET WITH AWAIVER TO ALLOW A 10-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINEWHERE 15 FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 2.30 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Craig Road andU.S.95 (APN 138-03-611-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59091]. Staff recommends

APPROVAL.

22. VAC-59399 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS 9-B, LLC, ET AL - OWNER:

EAGLE CREST LL, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate ALL EXISTING PUBLICEASEMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN EXISTING PUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE WESTAND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES at 5850-5900 Sky Pointe Drive, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58107]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

23. VAC-59466 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WAITT-MONTECITO REAL

ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate public drainage easements generally locatedsouth of Rome Boulevard and west of Grand Montecito Parkway, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59203]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.




24. VAC-59470 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING - OWNER: THM

ENTERPRISES, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 15-foot wide public drainage easementlocated at 8530 West Alexander Road (APN 138-05-801-064), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59435]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

25. VAC-59471 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DURANGO 95 MINI STORAGE

PARTNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a 20-foot wide public drainage easement

generally located east and south of the intersection of Farm Road and Oso Blanca Road, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59302].Staff recommends APPROVAL.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS

26. ABEYANCE - ZON-58533 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRECEDENT PROPERTIES,

LLC - OWNER: MARK EVERETT THROWER - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.03 acres at the northwest corner of DeerSprings Way and Thom Boulevard (APN 125-24-602-017), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58384]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

27. ABEYANCE - SUP-59027 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OPORTUN -

OWNER: B.E. UNO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,711SQUARE-FOOT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIED USE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOTDISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 112-FOOTDISTANCE SEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at 568 NorthEastern Avenue, Suite A (APN 139-36-111-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58965]. Staffrecommends DENIAL.

28. ABEYANCE - VAC-59208 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLEHOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate two five-foot wide publicdrainage easements located at 1961-1973 Simmons Street, (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

29. ABEYANCE - SDR-58932 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-59208 - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC. - For possible action ona request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR TWO PROPOSED FOUR-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENTS WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF SIX FEET

WHERE A MINIMUM OF 67.5 FEET IS REQUIRED AND WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO-FOOT WIDELANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES WHERE SIXFEET IS REQUIRED AND A 9-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAYWHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.48 acres at 1961-1973 Simmons Street (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), R-3(Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

30. GPA-59210 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HAFEN I, LLC -For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOODPRESERVATION) TO: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 0.48 acres at 3316 Valley Lane (APN 139-20-310-025), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59167]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

31. ZON-59212 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59210 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HAFEN I,

LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-3 (MEDIUM

DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 0.48 acres at 3316 Valley Lane (APN 139-20-310-025), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59167].Staff recommends APPROVAL.

32. GPA-59270 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: POSITIVELY KIDS -

OWNER: SWAN FOUNDATION, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: O(OFFICE) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.82 acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-036), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58502]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

33. ZON-59271 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59270 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: POSITIVELY KIDS

- OWNER: SWAN FOUNDATION, LLC - For possible action on a request for Rezoning FROM: C-D (DESIGNEDCOMMERCIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.82 acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-036), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58502]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.




34. SDR-59272 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-59270 AND ZON-59271 - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT: POSITIVELY KIDS - OWNER: SWAN FOUNDATION, LLC - For possible action on arequest for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 36-BED CONVALESCENT CAREFACILITY/NURSING HOME on 1.82 acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-036), C-D(Commercial-Development) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58502]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

35. GPA-59527 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ADAVEN HOMES -OWNER: DECISIVE PURSUIT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: DR(DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.00 acres at 9704 WestAlexander Road (APN 138-06-401-006), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59467]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

36. ZON-59529 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59527 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ADAVEN HOMES -

OWNER: DECISIVE PURSUIT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-PD2(RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 2 UNITS PER ACRE) TO: R-D (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-RESTRICTED) on 5.00 acres at 9704 West Alexander Road (APN 138-06-401-006), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59467].Staff recommends APPROVAL.

37. TMP-59532 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-59527 AND ZON-59529 - GRAND CANYON AND

ALEXANDER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ADAVEN HOMES - OWNER: DECISIVE PURSUIT, LLC

- For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 12-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

SUBDIVISION on 5.00 acres at 9704 West Alexander Road (APN 138-06-401-006), R-PD2 (Residential PlannedDevelopment - 2 Units Per Acre) [PROPOSED: R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59467]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

38. MOD-59457 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKYE CANYON

VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Modification of the Grand Canyon Village Plan TO ADD0.84 ACRES OF COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TO THE PLAN (Multiple APNs), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59394]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

39. GPA-59458 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKYE

CANYON VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: TND(TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT) TO: PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) on0.84 acres on the south side of Grand Canyon Drive, 280 Feet West of Oso Blanca Road (APNs 125-07-201-004 and 125-

07-101-008), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59394]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

40. ZON-59459 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59458 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SKYECANYON VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: T-D (TRADITIONALDEVELOPMENT) TO: P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) on 0.84 acres on the south side of Grand Canyon Drive, 280Feet West of Oso Blanca Road (APNs 125-07-201-004 and 125-07-101-008), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59394]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

41. ZON-59354 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILY REVOCABLE

FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-1 (SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL)TO: P-O (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE) on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) Ward 3 (Coffin)[PRJ-58948]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

42. VAR-59355 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-59354 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: COMERFAMILY REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW TWOPARKING SPACES WHERE SEVEN SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58948]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

43. VAR-59356 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-59354 AND VAR-59355 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILY REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for aVariance TO ALLOW A 50-FOOT WIDE P-O (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE) ZONED LOT WHERE THEREQUIREMENT IS A MINIMUM OF 60 FEET on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) Ward 3(Coffin) [PRJ-58948]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.




44. SDR-59357 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-59354, VAR-59355 AND VAR-59356 -

PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILY REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possibleaction on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR THE CONVERSION OF A SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE TO A 1,980 SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOTWIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE EAST PERIMETER WHERE FIFTEEN FEET IS REQUIRED AND TOALLOW A ZERO-TO-FIVE FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE PERIMETER BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTHPERIMETERS WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) R-1

(Single Family Residential) [PROPOSED: P-O (Professional Office)] Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58948]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

45. ZON-59511 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE PICHARDO - For possible actionon a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITYRESIDENTIAL) on 0.24 acres at 625 South 10th Street (APN 139-34-810-110), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-59324]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

46. VAR-59512 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-59511 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE

PICHARDO - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACKWHERE TEN FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.24 acres at 625 South 10th Street (APN 139-34-810-110), R-1(Single Family Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: R-3 (Medium Density Residential)], Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-59324]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

47. SDR-59513 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-59511 AND VAR-59512 - PUBLICHEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOSE PICHARDO - For possible action on a request for a Site DevelopmentPlan Review FOR A PROPOSED 10-UNIT, THREE-STORY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITHWAIVERS TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE WEST PERIMETERWHERE TEN FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND A ZERO-FOOT BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THEEAST PERIMETER WHERE SIX FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.24 acres at 625 South 10th Street (APN139-34-810-110), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone [PROPOSED: R-3 (Medium Density Residential)], Ward 3(Coffin) [PRJ-59324]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

48. ZON-59524 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - OWNER:

FARROKHTALA FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-PD4 (RESIDENTIALPLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 4 UNITS PER ACRE) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 16.24 acres atthe southwest corner of Sheleheda Avenue and Bradley Road (APNs 125-01-402-001 through 004 and 021), Ward 6

(Ross) [PRJ-59009]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

49. TMP-59526 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-59524 - GRANITE FALLS 3 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT: RICHMOND AMERICAN HOMES - OWNER: FARROKHTALA FAMILY TRUST - For possibleaction on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 77-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 16.24acres at the southwest corner of Sheleheda Avenue and Bradley Road (APNs 125-01-402-001 through 004 and 021), Ward6 (Ross) [PRJ-59009]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

50. VAR-59486 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: 1701 EAST OAKEY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO PARKING SPACES WHERE 27 SPACES AREREQUIRED FOR A PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY USE on 1.25 acres located at 1701 East Oakey Boulevard (APN162-02-209-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-59402]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

51. SUP-59487 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-59486 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 1701 EAST OAKEY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PUBLICSCHOOL, PRIMARY USE at 1701 East Oakey Boulevard (APN 162-02-209-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential),Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-59402]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

52. VAR-59491 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OVATION DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: THE

G.E.S. FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 16-FOOT TALL WALL ALONG A PORTION OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE WHERE FIVE FEET (TOP THREEFEET 50% OPEN) IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW 16-FOOT TALL WALL ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINEWHERE EIGHT FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED at the southeast corner of Vegas Drive and Rock Springs Drive(APN 138-27-501-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59369]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.




53. SUP-59492 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-59491 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:

OVATION DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: THE G.E.S. FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - For possible actionon a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 230-UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENTSDEVELOPMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW NO GROUND-LEVEL NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTAND APARTMENTS LOCATED ON THE GROUND FLOOR at the southeast corner of Vegas Drive and Rock SpringsDrive (APN 138-27-501-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59369]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

54. SDR-59494 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-59491 AND SUP-59492 - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT: OVATION DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: THE G.E.S. FAMILY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 230-UNITSENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW AN EIGHT-FOOTLANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A PORTION OF THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS THE MINIMUMREQUIRED on 7.09 acres at the southeast corner of Vegas Drive and Rock Springs Drive (APN 138-27-501-001), C-1(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59369]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

55. VAR-59497 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 2117 ALTA, LLC - For possible actionon a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 12-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS THE MINIMUMREQUIRED AND A FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.19acres at 2117 Alta Drive (APN 139-32-704-001), PD (Planned Development) Zone [P-O (Professional Office) Las VegasMedical District Special Land Use Designation], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59430]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

56. VAR-59498 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59497 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 2117

ALTA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 20-FOOT WIDE TWO-WAY DRIVEAISLE WHERE A 24-FOOT WIDE DRIVE AISLE IS REQUIRED on 0.19 acres at 2117 Alta Drive (APN 139-32-704-001), PD (Planned Development) Zone [P-O (Professional Office) Las Vegas Medical District Special Land UseDesignation], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59430]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

57. SDR-59499 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-59497 AND VAR-59498 - PUBLIC

HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 2117 ALTA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development PlanReview FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 3,150 SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TOALLOW A NINE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS THEMINIMUM REQUIRED AND A ZERO-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE EAST, SOUTH ANDPORTION OF THE WEST PROPERTY LINE WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.19 acres at 2117 Alta Drive

(APN 139-32-704-001), PD (Planned Development) Zone [P-O (Professional Office) Las Vegas Medical District SpecialLand Use Designation], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59430]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

58. VAR-59528 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D R HORTON - OWNER: 303 COTTON, LLC,

ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW INADEQUATE AUTO AND PEDESTRIANCONNECTIONS FOR A PROPOSED 60-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 20.0 acres at the northeast corner ofElkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-18-401-001, 002, 009 and 010), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59479]. Staffrecommends DENIAL.

59. VAR-59530 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59528 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D R HORTON -

OWNER: 303 COTTON, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A PRIVATESTREET WITH NO GATE AND A 42-FOOT WIDE STREET WIDTH WHERE 47-FOOT IS REQUIRED FOR APROPOSED 60-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 20.0 acres at the northeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai

Way (APNs 125-18-401-001, 002, 009 and 010), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59479]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

60. VAC-59533 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D R HORTON - OWNER: 303 COTTON, LLC,

ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements and the full width ofEula Street, between Elkhorn Road and Solar Avenue, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59479]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

61. TMP-59534 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-59528, VAR-59530 AND VAC-59533 -

HUALAPAI/SEVERENCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: D R HORTON - OWNER: 303 COTTON, LLC,

ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED 60-LOT RESIDENTIALSUBDIVISION on 20.0 acres at the northeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APNs 125-18-401-001, 002,009 and 010), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59479]. Staff recommends DENIAL.




62. VAR-59540 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CASCADE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC -

OWNER: THE TASS C. HARDIN & LOIS I. HARDIN REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on arequest for a Variance TO ALLOW 26 PARKING SPACES WHERE 76 SPACES ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED at6640 West Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-11-406-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59440].Staff recommends DENIAL.

63. VAR-59542 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-59540 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CASCADE

FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC - OWNER: THE TASS C. HARDIN & LOIS I. HARDIN REVOCABLE FAMILYTRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF10 FEET WHERE A MINIMUM OF 105 FEET IS REQUIRED at 6640 West Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-11-406-012),C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59440]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

64. SUP-59544 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-59540 AND VAR-59542 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT: CASCADE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC - OWNER: THE TASS C. HARDIN & LOIS I.HARDIN REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR APROPOSED 12,206 SQUARE-FOOT FACILITY TO PROVIDE TESTING, TREATMENT OR COUNSELING FORDRUG OR ALCOHOL ABUSE USE at 6640 West Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-11-406-012), C-1 (Limited Commercial)Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59440]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

65. SDR-59546 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-59540, VAR-59542 AND SUP-59544 -

PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CASCADE FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC - OWNER: THE TASS C.

HARDIN & LOIS I. HARDIN REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a SiteDevelopment Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 12,206 SQUARE-FOOT FACILITY TO PROVIDE TESTING,TREATMENT OR COUNSELING FOR DRUG OR ALCOHOL ABUSE AND 58-BED CONVALESCENT CAREFACILITY/NURSING HOME BUILDING on 0.90 acres at 6640 West Cheyenne Avenue (APN 138-11-406-012), C-1(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59440]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

66. VAR-59525 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COLVIN FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 14-FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET ISTHE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.35 acres at 224 Desert View Street (APN 139-32-512-004), R-PD4 (ResidentialPlanned Development - 4 Units Per Acre) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59495]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

67. WVR-59348 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EDWARD GALEN STOCKTON - For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO STREETLIGHTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 9.26

acres at the southeast corner of Tenaya Way and Wittig Avenue (APNs 125-22-601-023 and 024), U (Undeveloped) Zone[DR (Desert Rural Density Residential)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58511]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

68. VAR-59349 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59348 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: EDWARD

GALEN STOCKTON - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO AMENITY ZONE ANDSIDEWALK WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 9.26 acres at the southeast corner of Tenaya Way and Wittig Avenue(APNs 125-22-601-023 and 024), U (Undeveloped) Zone [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58511]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

69. VAR-59609 - VARIANCE RELATED TO WVR-59348 AND VAR-59349 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: EDWARD GALEN STOCKTON - For possible action on a request for a Variance TOALLOW AN EXISTING SIX-FOOT TALL WALL IN THE FRONT YARD WHERE FIVE FEET (TOP THREE FEET50% OPEN) IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED IN THE FRONT YARD on 9.26 acres at the southeast corner of

Tenaya Way and Wittig Avenue (APNs 125-22-601-023 and 024), U (Undeveloped) Zone [DR (Desert Rural DensityResidential)], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58511]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

70. VAC-59670 - VACATION RELATED TO WVR-59348, VAR-59349 AND VAR-59609 - PUBLIC HEARING -

APPLICANT/OWNER: EDWARD GALEN STOCKTON - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate APUBLIC MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT generally located adjacent to the northeast corner of Tenaya Way and HaleyAvenue (APNs 125-22-601-023 and 024), U (Undeveloped) Zone [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential)], Ward 6 (Ross)[PRJ-58511]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.




71. SUP-59406 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CALLIE KLEIN-

CALIGING, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED HORSE CORRALOR STABLE (COMMERCIAL) USE FOR A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT HORSES on 1.32 acres at 6020 West La MadreWay (APN 125-36-302-007), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59186]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

72. SUP-59535 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LIQUOR EMPORIUM - OWNER:

JONES & 95, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,328SQUARE-FOOT PACKAGE LIQUOR OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at 240 North Jones Boulevard, Suite F(APN 138-25-417-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59135]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

73. SUP-59539 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BOYER SKYPOINTE

ACADEMY LP - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKINGSTANDARD TO ALLOW 429 PARKING SPACES WHERE 516 SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSEDSECONDARY SCHOOL (HIGH SCHOOL) at 7038 Sky Pointe Drive (APN 125-21-102-009), T-C (Town Center) [SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use - Town Center)] Special Land Use designation, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58877]. Staff recommendsDENIAL.

74. RQR-59613 - REQUIRED REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DYNAMIC PROPERTY

HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Required Review of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-

53970) FOR AN EXISTING PUBLIC SCHOOL, SECONDARY USE at 7485 West Azure Drive (APN 125-27-114-023),T-C (Town Center) Zone [SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross)[PRJ-59614]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

75. SDR-59472 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: 120 6TH

STREET, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PARKING LOT ANDPRIVATE OUTDOOR PLAZA WITH WAIVERS OF THE DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN PARKING LOTLANDSCAPING AND SCREENING FENCE DESIGN STANDARDS on 0.32 acres at 120 South 6th Street (APN 139-34-611-052), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-59363]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

76. SDR-59556 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LV LAND

COMPANY, LLC - OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - For possible action on arequest for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 26,600 SQUARE-FOOT

GOVERNMENT FACILITY (COURTHOUSE) WITH WAIVERS OF DOWNTOWN CENTENNIAL PLAN BUILD-TO LINE, PARKING LOT SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING, AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS on0.56 acres at the southeast corner of Clark Avenue and 4th Street (APN 139-34-303-002), C-2 (General Commercial)Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-59454]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

77. ROC-59383 - REVIEW OF CONDITION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WESTERN STATES LODGING,

LLC - OWNER: EL CAPITAN INTERCHANGE - For possible action on a request for a Review of Condition of anapproved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-57635) TO DELETE CONDITION #14 WHICH STATES,"CONCURRENT WITH DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE, EXTEND PUBLIC SEWER IN REGENA AVENUE TOTHE WEST EDGE OF THIS SITE" on 3.47 acres on the northwest corner of Riley Street and Durango Drive (APN 125-29-502-009), T-C (Town Center) Zone [SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation],Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59202]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:

78. TXT-59551 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - Fordiscussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC 19.12.120(F) to allow Off-Premise Signs that are required to be removed for publicly funded improvements to be relocated onto a different parcel or subdivision lot without a SpecialUse Permit or Variance under certain circumstances, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

79. TXT-59655 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - Fordiscussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC Chapter 19.12 regarding the Short-Term Residential Rentaluse to require a Special Use Permit for the use in residential zoning districts under certain circumstances and to provide forother related matters. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.




80. TXT-59871 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - Fordiscussion and possible action on a request to amend Section B.3.B of the Town Center Development Standards Manualregarding Conditional Uses to allow Auto Dealer Inventory Storage as an interim use when approved concurrently with aMotor Vehicle Sales (New) use, and to provide for other related matters. Staff has NO RECOMMENDATION.

81. TXT-59905 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - Fordiscussion and possible action on a request to amend LVMC 19.12.070 and 19.18.020 related to the Nightclub use by

revising requirements, standards and applicability and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

CITIZENS PARTICIPATION:

82. CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BELIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAYBE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND ISSCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAMEFOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNTOF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED



Agenda Item No.: 1.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JULY 14, 2015

DEPARTMENT: PLANNING

DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO

SUBJECT:CALL TO ORDER



Agenda Item No.: 2.




SUBJECT:ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW



Agenda Item No.: 3.




SUBJECT:

ROLL CALL



Agenda Item No.: 4.




SUBJECT:PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TOMATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TOTHE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OFDISCUSSION, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER ISALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED



Agenda Item No.: 5.




SUBJECT:FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNINGCOMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 12, 2015 AND JUNE 9, 2015.



Agenda Item No.: 6.



DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:

FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or theapplicant wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward andacted upon at this time.



Agenda Item No.: 7.




SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - TMP-58507 - TENTATIVE MAP - BRISTLE HEIGHTS - APPLICANT:MOSAIC LAND, LLC - OWNER: S I C NEVADA ONE, LLC, ET AL - For possible action ona request for a Tentative Map FOR A 58-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIALSUBDIVISION on 10.42 acres at the south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feeteast of Hualapai Way (APNs 125-19-301-002 and 003), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot)Zone, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58401]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 8/19/2015

OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within Seven Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Withdrawal Request

2. Location and Aerial Maps3. Conditions and Staff Report4. Supporting Documentation5. Photo(s)6. Justification Letter



By nlares at 7:41 am, Jun 16, 201

TMP-58507



ｘ゜ธㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㅡｘ



ｘ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㅡｘ



ｘ゜ธㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㅡｘ



╗ Ҝ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О Ḷ Ő

Ա Ő ● Ɔ ╗ Ձ ǲ Ġ ǲ ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ

Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ձ A Ќ

Ｃ ● Ɔ Ձ A ● Ҝ ǲ Ő Ќ Ḷ ╗ ǲ

Ձ ǲ Ḛ ǲ Ќ Ｃ

Ձ ǲ Ḛ A Ձ Ｃ ǲ Ɔ Ő ● О ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ ● Ќ Ｃ ǲ Ṳ

A Ɔ ● Ќ Ḛ Ձ ǲ A Ҝ ● Ձ Ő ǲ Ɔ ● Ｃ ǲ Ќ ╗ ● A Ձ Ɔ Ⓢ Ա

Ｃ ● Ћ ● Ɔ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ա A Ɔ ● Ɔ Ḷ Ա ǲ A Ő ● Ќ Ḛ Ɔ

Ա ǲ Ќ Ġ Ҝ A Ő

A О Ќ

ธ ㄦ

ɱ ｘ

ｘｘ ธ

ธ ㄦ

ɱ ｘ

ｘｘ

ｘ㈠ｘ

ો ゜ A Ő ǲ Ɔ

Ｃ ǲ Ɔ ● Ḛ Ќ ǲ Ќ Ḛ

● Ќ ǲ ǲ Ő

A О О Ձ ● A Ќ ╗

Ћ ● ● Ќ ● ╗ Ҝ A О

Ḛ ǲ Ќ ǲ Ő A Ձ Ќ Ḷ ╗ ǲ Ɔ

Ա Ⓢ ● Ձ Ｃ ● Ќ Ḛ Ɔ ǲ ╗ Ա A Ő ǲ Ợ Ⓢ ● Ő ǲ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗ Ɔ

Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ⓢ Ɔ ǲ ● Ќ

Ḷ Ő Ҝ A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

● ธ ㄦ

Ｃ ǲ ǲ Ő Ɔ О Ő ● Ќ Ḛ Ɔ

Ḷ Û Ќ ǲ Ő

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О

Ա Ő ● Ɔ ╗ Ձ ǲ Ġ ǲ ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ

Ḷ Ћ ǲ Ő Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗

ｘ゜ ธ ㅡ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ㅡ ｘ

T M

P - 5 8 5 0 7



╗ Ҝ

ธ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О

Ա Ő ● Ɔ ╗ Ձ ǲ Ġ ǲ ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О

ｘ゜ ธ ″ ゜ㄦ


T M

P - 5 8 5 0 7



Ձ Ɔ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О

Ա Ő ● Ɔ ╗ Ձ ǲ Ġ ǲ ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ

Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ɔ Ｃ A О ǲ О Ձ A Ќ

ｘ゜ ธ ″ ゜ㄦ


T M

P - 5 8 5 0 7



╗ Ҝ ㅡ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О

Ա Ő ● Ɔ ╗ Ձ ǲ Ġ ǲ ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ

ǲ A Ɔ ╗ Û ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ Ɔ ǲ ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

A

Ќ Ḷ

Ő ╗ Ġ

Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ Ɔ ǲ ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ա

Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ Ɔ ǲ ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ Ɔ

ｘ゜ ธ ㅡ ゜ㄦ


T M

P - 5 8 5 0 7



╗ Ҝ

О Ⓢ Ա Ձ ● ฎ ｘ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗ Ҝ A İ Ḷ Ő Ḷ Ձ Ձ ǲ ╗ Ḷ Ő

ǲ A Ɔ ╗ О Ő Ḷ О ǲ Ő ╗ Ձ ● Ќ ǲ Ɔ ǲ ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ㄦ

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ⓢ Ա Ձ ● ㅡ ՙ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗

ธ

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ О Ⓢ Ա Ձ ●

ㅡ ՙ ƥ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗ ӧ Ġ A Ձ Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗ ỏ

╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ● Ћ ǲ Ҝ A О

Ա Ő ● Ɔ ╗ Ձ ǲ Ġ ǲ ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ

Ｃ ǲ ╗ A ● Ձ Ɔ

Û ǲ Ɔ ╗

О Ő Ḷ О ǲ Ő ╗ Ձ ● Ќ ǲ Ɔ ǲ ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ㅡ

ｘ゜ ธ ″ ゜ㄦ


T M

P - 5 8 5 0 7



T M P - 5 8 5 0 7

[ P R J - 5 8 4 0 1 ] -

T E N T A T I V E M

A P -

A P P L I C A N T : M O S

A I C

L A N D , L L C

-

O W N E R : S

I C

N E V A D A O N E , L L C

, E T A L

S O U T H S I D E O F D

E E R S P R I N G S W A Y , A P P

R O X I M A T E L Y 2 8 5 F E E T E A S T O F H U A L A P A I W A Y

0 4 / 0 2 / 1 5



ｘ゜ธㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㅡｘ

TMP-58507



Agenda Item No.: 8.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNINGPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JULY 14, 2015



SUBJECT:TMP-59501 - TENTATIVE MAP - 95 & DURANGO (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -APPLICANT/OWNER: REMINGTON COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC - For possible action on arequest for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on thenorthwest corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive (APN 125-17-301-012), T-C (TownCenter) Zone [GC-TC (General Commercial-Town Center) Special Land Use Designation],Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59484]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON

OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)





BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps

2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: JULY 14, 2015


ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: REMINGTON COMMERCIAL VIII, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE

NUMBER RECOMMENDATION

REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

TMP-59501 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** CONDITIONS **

TMP-59501 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map isnot recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map with four (4)years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. All development shall conform to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development PlanReview (SDR-58128).

3. A note shall be added to the final map to provide irrevocable, perpetual common accessand parking to all driveways, drive aisles and parking spaces for all sites located within the

boundaries of the commercial subdivision.

4. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-interestcommunity, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and Restrictions (“CC&R”),

or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record aDeclaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on allassociated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMRis to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

Conditions Page Two

July 14, 2015 - Planning Commission Meeting

along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interestcommunity or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a briefdescription of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. TheDPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of FieldOperations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within thecommunity are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenanceobligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for saidmaintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance withthe DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recordedDPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.

5. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants andwater supply, shall be installed and functioning prior to construction of any combustiblestructures.

6. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State SubdivisionStatutes.

Public Works

7. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All parcels createdthrough this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all driveways servicing theoverall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of theCity Engineer.”

8. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All subdivided lotswithin this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage rights across all existingand future parcel limits.” This condition shall not be enforced if the Owner demonstrates

to the satisfaction of the Flood Control Section of Public Works that each lot can drainindependently to abutting public roadways.

9. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits,submittal of any construction drawings or the submittal of a Map subdividing this site,whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in theapproved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct

such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by theCity of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Studyconcurrent with development of this site. The Drainage Study required by SDR-58128may be used to satisfy this condtion.

10. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be compliedwith or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance securitymethod in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

Conditions Page Three


11. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is inconcept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or

alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainageimprovements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. Nodeviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approvalfor such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or theapproval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval ofthis Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of suchdeviations.

12. Site Development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-58128 andall other site-related actions.



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

Staff Report Page One


** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has requested a Tentative Map in order to create a one-lot commercial subdivisionon 6.49 acres located at the northwest corner of Oso Blanca Road and Durango Drive. Currently,the subject site is undeveloped. However, on 04/14/15, the Planning Commission approved a SiteDevelopment Plan Review (SDR-58128) for a 37,220 square-foot shopping center. Mapping thesite as a one-lot commercial subdivision would allow the owner/applicant the flexibility to sell portions of the site and delineate ownership through future records of survey. The map meets andcomplies with Title 19 and NRS 278 requirements for a Tentative Map; therefore, staff

recommends approval with conditions. If denied, the recorded records of survey would remain.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc

12/07/98The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) of 1,468 acres to the T-C(Town Center) zoning district. The subject site was included in this Rezoningrequest. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

04/14/15

The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-58125) for arestaurant (with drive-through) use located at the northwest corner of Oso

Blanco Road and Durango Drive. Staff recommended approval.The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-58126) for arestaurant (with drive-through) use located at the northwest corner of OsoBlanco Road and Durango Drive. Staff recommended approval.

The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-58127) for aconvenience store (with fuel pumps) use with a waiver to allow a 250-footdistance separation from a single-family, detached property where 330 feet isrequired located at the northwest corner of Oso Blanco Road and DurangoDrive. Staff recommended approval.

The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-58128) for a 37,220 square-foot shopping center with a waiver to allow a six-foot wide landscape buffer along the east perimeter where a minimum of eightfeet is required located at the northwest corner of Oso Blanco Road andDurango Drive. Staff recommended approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership

10/01/14 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

Staff Report Page Two


Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

There are no related building permits or business licenses on file for the subject site.

Pre-Application Meeting

05/27/15Staff met with the representative and reviewed the requirements for a one-lotcommercial subdivision Tentative Map application. No major issues werenoted.

Neighborhood Meeting

A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check

06/04/15Staff visited the site and found an undeveloped parcel clean and free of trashand debris.

Details of Application Request

Site Area

Net Acres 6.49

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special

Land Use Designation Existing Zoning District

Subject Property Undeveloped

GC-TC [(GeneralCommercial – TownCenter) Special Land

Use Designation]

T-C (Town Center)

North Undeveloped

GC-TC [(GeneralCommercial – TownCenter) Special Land

Use Designation]

T-C (Town Center)

South Undeveloped

PF-TC [(PublicFacilities – Town

Center) Special LandUse Designation]

T-C (Town Center)

East Undeveloped

SC-TC [(ServiceCommercial – TownCenter) Special Land

Use Designation]

T-C (Town Center)



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

Staff Report Page Three


Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


WestMulti Family,

Attached

SX-TC [(SuburbanMixed Use – Town

Center) Special LandUse Designation]

T-C (Town Center)

Master Plan Areas Compliance

Town Center Master Plan Y

Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance

T-C (Town Center) District Y

Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance

Trails Y

Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A

Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A

Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Street Name

Functional

Classification of Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width(Feet)

Compliance

with Street Section

Oso Blanca RoadTown Center

Frontage Road

Town CenterDevelopment Standards

Manual90 Y

ANALYSIS

The 6.49-acre subject site is located at the northwest corner of Oso Blanca Road and DurangoDrive. Currently, the site is undeveloped. However, on 04/14/15, the Planning Commission

approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-58128) for a 37,220 square-foot shopping center.Mapping the site as a one-lot commercial subdivision would allow the owner/applicant theflexibility to sell portions of the site and delineate ownership through future records of survey.

The Department of Public Works has the following comments. The submitted north/south crosssection show a maximum natural grade less than 2% across this site. Per the Tables inSubdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope less than or equal to 2%, isallowed a maximum 4-foot retaining wall. No retaining walls are shown along the north or south property lines.



TMP-59501 [PRJ-59484]

GK

Staff Report Page Four


The submitted east/west cross section show a maximum natural grade less than 2% across thissite. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope less than or

equal to 2%, is allowed a maximum 4-foot retaining wall. No retaining walls are shown alongthe east or west property lines.

FINDINGS (TMP-59501)

The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes, Title 19 and the approvedSite Development Plan Review (SDR-58128) for this site. Therefore, staff recommendsapproval with conditions.

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 58

NOTICES MAILED N/A

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡฎㅡ

TMP-59501



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


TMP-59501



Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ ǲ Ő

● A Ձ

Ձ Ḷ ╗

Ḷ Û

Ќ ǲ Ő

゜Ｃ ǲ Ћ ǲ Ձ

Ḷ О ǲ Ő

Ќ Ḷ ╗ ǲ

Ա A Ɔ ● Ɔ

Ḷ Ա ǲ A Ő ● Ќ

Ḛ

Ա ǲ Ќ

Ġ Ҝ A Ő

Ձ Ḷ

Ḷ Ｃ Ύ

Ḷ Ќ ǲ Ｃ A ╗ A

Ձ ǲ Ḛ

A Ձ Ｃ ǲ

Ɔ Ő ● О ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗

Ɔ ǲ

╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

Ḷ Ɔ Ḷ Ա Ձ A Ќ

A Ő

Ḷ A Ｃ

ｘㄦ゜ ธ ฎ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ㅡ ฎ ㅡ

T M P - 5 9 5 0 1



Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ ǲ Ő ● A Ձ

Ձ Ḷ ╗

Ա A

Ɔ ● Ɔ


Ḛ

Ա ǲ Ќ

Ġ Ҝ A Ő

Ձ Ḷ

Ḷ Ｃ

Ύ Ḷ Ќ ǲ Ｃ A ╗ A



T M

P 5 9 5 0 1



Ա A

Ɔ ● Ɔ


Ḛ

Ա ǲ Ќ

Ġ Ҝ A Ő

Ձ Ḷ

Ḷ Ｃ




T M P 5 9 5 0 1



Ա A

Ɔ ● Ɔ


Ḛ

Ա ǲ Ќ

Ġ Ҝ A Ő

Ձ Ḷ

Ḷ Ｃ




T M

P - 5 9 5 0 1



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


TMP-59501



T M P - 5 9 5 0 1 [ P R J - 5

9 4 8 4 ] - T E N T A T I V E M A

P - A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : R E M I N G T O N C O M M E R C I A

L V I I I , L L C

N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R O F O S O B L A N C A R O

A D A N D D U R A N G O D R I V

E

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘ″゜ｘㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡฎㅡTMP-59501



Agenda Item No.: 9.

AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE - PLANNINGPLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF: JULY 14, 2015



SUBJECT:TMP-59549 - TENTATIVE MAP - SUNNY PLACE COMMERCIAL CENTER -APPLICANT/OWNER: DRAGON 7 HENDERSON PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible actionon a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 1.51acres at the southwest corner of Washington Avenue and Martin L King Boulevard (APNs 139-28-304-001, 139-28-312-001, 003 and 004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow)[PRJ-59320]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps




TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DRAGON 7 HENDERSON

PROPERTIES, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

TMP-59549 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. This approval shall be void four years from the date of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed forconsideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking acrossthe entire subdivision.

3. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants andwater supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of anycombustible structures.


or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record aDeclaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all

associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMRis to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interestcommunity or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a briefdescription of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components.



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR

Conditions Page Two


The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of FieldOperations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the

community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenanceobligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for saidmaintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance withthe DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recordedDPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City departments and State subdivisionstatutes.

Public Works

6. Construct curb and gutter immediately adjacent to the east right of way line and half street paving plus appropriate overpaving on Sunny Place concurrent with development of thissite. No parking shall be allowed adjacent to this site on Sunny Place; the curbing shall be painted red and appropriate signage shall be installed prior to occupancy of this site asrequired by the Department of Public Works.

7. Access to Sunny Place from this site will not be allowed and a note to this effect shall be placed on the Final Map for this site.

8. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscapingand private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as

to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development accessdrives and abutting street intersections.

9. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All parcels created

through this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all driveways servicing theoverall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of theCity Engineer.”

10. The onsite sewer shall be private and per Title 19.16.060.W. 2, sewer service for thiscommercial subdivision shall be shown in accordance with one of the following threealternatives, and the appropriate note shall appear on the face of the recorded Final Map:

I. Onsite sewers, 8-inches in diameter or larger, are public sewers wherelocated within 20 foot wide dedicated public sewer easements.

II. Onsite sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained perthe Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this commercialsubdivision.

III. Onsite sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained perthe Joint Use Agreement of this commercial subdivision.



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR



11. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All subdivided lots

within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage rights across all existing

and future parcel limits.” This condition shall not be enforced if the Owner demonstratesto the satisfaction of the Flood Control Section of Public Works that each lot can drainindependently to abutting public roadways.

12. Contact the City Engineer’s Office at (702-229-6272) to coordinate the development of this project with the “Washington Storm Drain” project and any other public improvement

projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.

13. Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements, if any, inthe Sunny Place public right-of-way prior to this issuance of permits for theseimprovements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the

Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entityon this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove propertyencroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms ofthe City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all privateimprovements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent propertyowner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of theEncroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreementwith the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).

14. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be complied

with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved performance securitymethod in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and 19.02.130.E.

15. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is inconcept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/oralignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainageimprovements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. Noadditional deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific writtenapproval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Mapor the approval of subdivision related construction plans, whichever may occur first.Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such

approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showingelimination of such deviations



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to map the approved commercial development located on thesouthwest corner of Washington Avenue and Martin L. King Boulevard. Currently the siteconsists of four unusable commercial lots with a single owner. Remapping the site as acommercial single lot commercial subdivision will give the owner/applicant the flexibility to selloff portions of the site and delineate ownership through future records of survey. Staffrecommends approval this applicant with conditions.

ISSUES

A commercial subdivision will allow the owner the flexibility to sell portions of the landto multiple owners. A single-lot subdivision accomplishes the desired flexibility.


Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

10/21/87

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0090-87) request from R-E(Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) injunction with a retailcenter at the southeast corner of Washington Avenue and Martin L KingBoulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval. This land useentitlement has expired.

10/03/90

The City Council approved requests for a Rezoning (Z-0095-90) from R-E(Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) in conjunction with a PlotPlan Review (Z-0095-90) for a 20,658 square-foot Shopping Center at thesoutheast corner of Washington Avenue and Martin L King Boulevard. ThePlanning Commission recommended approval.

10/02/91

The City Council approved an Extension of Time (Z-0095-90) for Resolution

of Intent to Rezone (Z-0095-90) the property from R-E (Residence Estates)to C-1 (Limited Commercial) in conjunction with a Plot Plan Review (Z-0095-90) for a 20,658 square-foot Shopping Center at the southeast corner ofWashington Avenue and Martin L King Boulevard. The PlanningCommission recommended approval.



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR




10/03/92

The City Council approved an Extension of Time (Z-0095-90) for Resolution

of Intent to Rezone (Z-0095-90) the property from R-E (Residence Estates) toC-1 (Limited Commercial) in conjunction with a Plot Plan Review (Z-0095-90) for a 20,658 square-foot Shopping Center at the southeast corner ofWashington Avenue and Martin L King Boulevard. The PlanningCommission recommended approval.

12/17/92The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0095-90) for a bank on the northwest corner of the shopping center at the southeast corner ofWashington Avenue and Martin L King Boulevard.

11/04/92

The City Council approved an Extension of Time (Z-0095-90) for aResolution of Intent to Rezone (Z-0095-90) the property from R-E (ResidenceEstates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) in conjunction with a Plot Plan Review

(Z-0095-90) for a 20,658 square-foot Shopping Center at the southeast cornerof Washington Avenue and Martin L King Boulevard. The PlanningCommission recommended approval of this request.

06/07/00

The City Council approved a Resolution of Intent [Z-0095-90 (6)] to Rezone(Z-0095-90) the property from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (LimitedCommercial) in conjunction with a Plot Plan Review (Z-0095-90) for a20,658 square-foot Shopping Center at the southeast corner of WashingtonAvenue and Martin L King Boulevard. The Planning Commissionrecommends approval of this request.

10/29/07A complaint was filed with Code Enforcement for trailers in the right-of-wayand on the vacant lot at the southeast corner of Washington Avenue and

Martin L King Boulevard. The complaint was resolved on 11/03/07.

11/12/13

The Planning Commission voted to Table a request for a Variance (VAR-49497) to allow a 100-foot residential adjacency setback where 225 feet isrequired and a Special Use Permit (SUP-49639) for a 75-foot tall WirelessCommunication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopole) adjacent to the southside of Washington Avenue approximately 200 feet west of Martin L KingBoulevard.




There are no building permits or business license for this property



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR




05/18/15

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant’s designated

representative and the following was discussed:

1. The submittal requirements for a Tentative Map Review.2. The need to show topography 150 feet from the property line.3. The need to possibly dedicate five feet along Sunny Place.4. The need for the developer to post an improvement bond prior to the

recordation of the final map.


A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.

Field Check

06/04/15A field check was conducted on the property. Staff discovered patches ofweeds and garbage on the property. A complaint was filed with CodeEnforcement on 06/10/15.


Site Area Net Acres 1.51

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Vacant C (Commercial)C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

North VacantR (Rural Density

Residential)R-E (Residence Estates)

South Vacant C (Commercial)C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

EastSingle, Family

Residential MXU (Mixed-Use R-E Residence Estates

Vacant

WestCommunity

Recreational Facility(Public)

PF (Public Facilities) C-V Civic



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR




West Las Vegas Plan Y Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance

A-O (Airport Overlay) District (140 Feet) Y


Trails N/A

Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y




Pursuant to 19.08.070 , the following standards apply:

Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance

Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 411 Feet Y

ANALYSIS

The remapping of this site is consistent with the Las Redevelopment Plan Objectives “B” and“C”. The Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Objective “B” states, “The assembly of land into parcels suitable for modern, integrated development and allowing for improved pedestrian and

vehicular circulation in the Redevelopment Area.” Additionally, the Las Vegas RedevelopmentObjective C states, “The r eplanning, redesign and development of undeveloped areas that arestagnant or improperly utilized.” The site is undeveloped. The mapping of this site as a one-lotcommercial subdivision will allow for future records of survey to be drawn delineatingownership of portions of the site. The proposed configuration of land meets the minimum lotwidth requirement and will be evaluated for code compliance at the time a Site DevelopmentPlan Review is submitted.

Public Works noted that the north/south and east/west cross sections are not shown with thisTentative Map submittal. However, since this property and all surrounding property is developed orgraded, no retaining walls are shown or anticipated.


The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes and Title 19. The lots in theirexisting configuration do not allow for development. The reconfiguring of said lots into a singlelot will allow for future development. Any redesign of the site will require a site development plan review. As the reconfiguration of the four lots into a single lot will allow for futuredevelopment, staff recommends approval with conditions.



TMP-59549 [PRJ-59320]

MR

Staff Report Page Five



NOTICES MAILED N/A

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘ

TMP-59549



ｘ ″ ゜ ՙ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ธ ｘ

T M P - 5 9 5 4

9 - R E V I S E D



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘ

TMP-59549



T M P - 5 9 5 4 9

[ P R J - 5 9 3 2 0 ]

-

T E N T A T I V E

M A P

- A P P L I C A N T / O

W N E R :

D R A G O N

7

H E N D E R S O N

P R O P E R T I E S , L L C

S O U T H W E S T C O R N E R O F W A S H I N G T O N A

V E N U E A N D M A R T I N L K I N G B O U L E V A R D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



T M P - 5 9 5 4 9

[ P R J - 5 9 3 2 0 ]

-

T E N T A T I V E

M A P


W N E R :

D R A G O N

7

H E N D E R S O N




0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘTMP-59549



Agenda Item No.: 10.




SUBJECT:VAR-59522 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS'' RX NEVADA, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ARESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF 61 FEET WHERE 85 FEET IS REQUIREDFOR A PROPOSED 5,617 SQUARE-FOOT ANIMAL HOSPITAL, CLINIC OR SHELTER(WITH NO OUTSIDE PENS) on 0.32 acres at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard (APNs 138-25-613-043, 044 and 045), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59500]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:




VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: PETS' RX NEVADA, INC.


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAR-59522 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-59522 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the approved Rezoning (ZON-55758), and to the conditions of approval

for Site Development Plan Reviews (SDR-55761 and SDR-56933).

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed forconsideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed incompliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building andSafety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted

for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be satisfied,except as modified herein.



VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The subject site is located north of the northwest corner of Decatur Boulevard and CarmenBoulevard at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard. This request is for a new residential adjacencysetback Variance to allow the west end of the building to be constructed 61 feet from a protected property where 85 feet is required. This site has a previous residential adjacency setbackVariance (VAR-55760) to allow the second floor to be constructed 66 feet from a single-familyresidential property. The applicant has submitted revisions to align the first and second floors of

the west end of the building with each other. An administrative Site Development Plan Review(SDR-59523) accompanies this application and is dependent upon the outcome of thisapplication to move forward. Staff supports the requested Variance, as the lot is exceptionallyshallow. If this request is denied the applicant cannot construct the building in the proposedconfiguration; however, it can be constructed in conformance with prior approvals.

ISSUES

A Variance is required to allow a residential adjacency setback of 61 feet where 85 feet isrequired.



12/08/71

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0067-71) requestof the property from R-1 (Single Family Residence) to P-R (ProfessionalOffice and Parking) for the property generally located on the west side ofDecatur Boulevard, 75 feet north of Carmen Boulevard at 1104 North YaleStreet. The Planning Commission recommended approval.

12/04/74

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0051-74) request

from R-1 (Single Family Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) and a PlotPlan Review (Z-0021-74) for property generally located on the west side ofDecatur Boulevard between Carmen Boulevard and Westmoreland Drive, 270feet north of Carmen Boulevard, extending west to Yale Street.

02/19/75The City Council approved a Review of Conditions [Z-0051-74(1)] to allowemergency access on Yale Street. Staff recommended approval.



VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR




04/27/95

The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan and Building Elevation

Review [Z-0051-74) (2)] request for a temporary trailer to be used inconjunction with an existing animal hospital on the property located at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommended approval.

01/25/95The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan and Building ElevationReview [Z-0021-74(4) and Z-0051-74(3)] requests for a cellular transmissionfacility at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard. Staff recommends approval.

09/16/14A complaint was forwarded to Code Enforcement for outside storage (a cargocontainer) on the west side of the building.

11/19/14

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-55758) from P-R(Professional Office and Parking) to C-1 (Limited Commercial), Variance(VAR-55760) to allow a residential adjacency setback of 66 feet where 85

feet and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55761) for a proposed 5,459square-foot Animal Hospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no Outside Pens) with awaiver to allow a six-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the west property line where ten feet is required on 0.32 acres located at 1117 NorthDecatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommendedapproval.

12/01/14The Department of Planning approved a Site Development Plan Review(SDR-56933) for a 160 square-foot expansion to a 5,459 square-foot AnimalHospital, Clinic or Shelter (with no outside pens).




1975 The existing building was constructed.

11/08/00A business license (G50-06784) was issued for General Retail Sales at 1117 North Decatur Boulevard. The license was placed for collections as of06/17/15.

07/15/06A business license (P55-01701) was issued for a Veterinary Clinic at 1117

North Decatur Boulevard. The license is active as of 06/17/15.

04/09/15

A building permit (#284288) for a 5,527 square-foot Animal Hospital wasapplied for; however, the permit has not been issued as of 06/17/15.

A building permit (#284289) for a block wall applied for; however, the permithas not been issued as of 06/17/15.

A building permit (#284288) for a trash enclosure was applied for; however,the permit has not been issued as of 06/17/15.



VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR




05/28/15

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant’s designated

representative and the following was discussed:

1. The submittal requirements for a Minor Amendment to SiteDevelopment Plan Review (SDR-56933).

2. The need for a new residential adjacency setback Variance to allow thesecond floor of the proposed building to be constructed 61 from aresidential zoned property where 85 feet is required.



Field Check

06/04/15Staff conducted a field check of the site and there is an existing animalhospital. The structure and parking lot are clean and graffiti free.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.32

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use Per

Title 19.12

Planned or Special

Land Use

Designation

Existing Zoning District

Subject PropertyAnimal Hospital Clinic

or Shelter (with noOutside Pens)

SC (ServiceCommercial)

C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

NorthOffice, Other than

ListedSC (ServiceCommercial)


SouthOffice, Medical or

Dental

SC (Service

Commercial)

P-R (Professional Office

and Parking)

EastCommercial

Recreation/Amusement(Outdoor)

PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)

WestSingle-Family,

DetachedL (Low Density

Residential)R-1 (Single Family

Residential)



VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR




No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A

Special Purpose and Overlay Districts ComplianceA-O (Airport Overlay) District (105 Feet) Y


Trails Y





Pursuant to 19.08.070, the following standards apply:



Min. Setbacks

Front (Decatur Boulevard)

Side

Front (Yale Street)

10 Feet10 Feet10 Feet


YYY

Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following standards apply:

Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance

3:1 proximity slope 85 Feet 61 Feet N*

Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 94 Feet Y

*This is the reason for the residential adjacency setback Variance.

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:

Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number ofUnits

Required Provided Compliance

Parking Ratio

Parking Parking

Regular Handi-capped

Regular Handi-capped

AnimalHospital,Clinic orShelter (withOutside Pens)

8 Employees1 SP Per 2On-Duty

Employees4

2 Doctors1 SP PerDoctor

2



VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR



Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or Number of

Units


Parking Ratio

Parking ParkingRegular

Handi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

4 ExamRoom

1 SP PerExamRoom

4

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 10 14 Y

Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 9 1 13 1 Y

ANALYSIS

The site is located within a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district and has land useentitlements for a 5,619 square-foot animal hospital with a residential adjacency setbackVariance (VAR-55760) of 66 feet. The redesign of the building will align the first and secondfloors of the west end of the building. This visual alignment of the first and second floors createsa clean architectural line, but it would extend the second floor five feet closer to the residential properties to the west.

An administrative Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59523) was submitted for the proposedelevation changes and the two-square building expansion. SDR-59523 is dependent on theoutcome of this application and cannot proceed without the approval this residential adjacencysetback Variance.

The property will be a single through lot (or double frontage lot), in which the building setbackalong both Decatur Boulevard and Yale Street is 10 feet. The proposed animal hospital will beconstructed in a way that conforms to most of the development standards in the C-1 (LimitedCommercial) zoning district, provided SDR-55761, Condition of Approval #10 (that willconsolidate the platted lots) is exercised.

There are single-family properties to the west the site that are protected from nonresidentialdevelopment by Title 19.08.040. The submitted elevations fail to meet the 3:1 Proximity Slopeline on the northwest elevations. To meet the required slope the building would need to be set back 88 feet instead of the 61 feet provided. Staff supports the requested Variance due to theshallow depth of this lot. If this application is denied SDR-59523 cannot proceed as submitted;however, the applicant can construct the building in conformance with prior approvals.

FINDINGS (VAR-59522)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City Council,in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in order to:



VAR-59522 [PRJ-59500]

MR

Staff Report Page Six


1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;

3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptionaltopographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition ofthe piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardshipsupon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted soas to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantialdetriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources

and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance orresolution.”

The applicant’s request is within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting this Variance, dueto the shallow depth of the lots along Decatur Boulevard and Yale Street. The reducedresidential adjacency setback along Yale Street is consistent with the proposed and prior SiteDevelopment Plan Reviews. Approval of this Variance will allow more space to be utilized onthe site for parking, landscaping and the trash enclosure and for this project to meet most of Title19 requirements. Staff agrees that the hardship requested in this case is valid and thereforerecommends approval of this Variance.


NOTICES MAILED 178

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㄦｘｘ

VAR-59522



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㄦｘｘVAR-59522



Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ Ќこ⇡ ผ ОŐİ ㄦɱㄦｘｘ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ゜О ħ ħਙ ਙผ A₡こħ ƆＣŐⓒ Ŵ₡ ʉ ผ ħ₡ ħŴк Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱㌱ ⇡Ŵ㌱ ЋAŐ

Оผਙ㈾㌱ A₡₡ผ ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙỏ

ںںں ЌḶŐ╗Ġ ＣǲA╗ⓈŐ ԱՁЋＣ

Оผਙ㈾

㌱

ЌŴこ

ЋA ЌḶŐ╗Ġ ＣǲA╗ⓈŐ AЌ●ҜAՁ ĠḶƆО●╗AՁ

A ਙผ ОŴผ㌱ к ӧỏ

″ฎธㄦں ｘㅡں

ÛŴผ₡ ÛAŐＣ

ں

ӧՁḶ●Ɔ ╗AŐAЌ●AЌỏⓒ ÛAŐＣㄦ ӧŐ●● ㈠ ԱAŐՁḶÛỏ

γ Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ ●⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ

ਙผผ ㌱

⑾ ਙⓒ ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴف ʉγŴ

Ḛ

ผŴк ОкŴ Ｃ

ħف

Ŵ

ħਙ Оผਙऑਙ

₡ Ɔ

к

㌱

Ύਙħف Ｃħ ผħ㌱ Оผਙऑਙ ₡ Ɔ к ㌱

Ḛผਙ A㌱ผ ㈠ㅡ

Ձਙ

゜Ⓢħ

A₡₡ħ ħਙŴк ●⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħผ ЌŴこ γŴผк

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Ќħ㌱γਙкк

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ A₡₡ผ

₡ٹ Û Ḷкこऑħ㌱ Աкںธㅡｘں

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħ Ձਙ Aف к

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ɔ Ŵ Ŵкħ⑾ਙผħŴ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ύħऑ ɱｘｘ″ㅡں

ｘธธ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Оγਙ ӧ ںｘỏ ㄦՙں ″ㅡธธ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ŵゥ ӧ

ں

ｘỏ ㄦՙں

″ㅡｘㅡ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ǲこŴħк ㌱γŴผк ㈠ħ㌱γਙкк㌀ٹ㌱ŴŴ ㌱γ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ő ऑ ħผ ЌŴこ γŴผк

Ő ऑ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Ќħ㌱γਙкк

Ő ऑ A₡₡ผ

₡ٹ Û Ḷкこऑħ㌱ Աкںธㅡｘں

Ő

ऑ ħ

Ձਙ Aف

к

Ő ऑ Ɔ Ŵ Ŵкħ⑾ਙผħŴ

Ő

ऑ Ύħऑ ɱｘｘ″ㅡں

ｘธธ

Ő ऑ Оγਙ ӧ ںｘỏ ㄦՙں ″ㅡธธ

Ő ऑ Ŵゥ ӧ ںｘỏ ㄦՙں ″ㅡｘㅡ

Ő ऑ ǲこŴħк ㌱γŴผк ㈠ħ㌱γਙкк㌀ٹ㌱ŴŴ ㌱γ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ㄦｘں ㄦ゜ธฎ゜ธｘںㄦɱ ОҜ

ՁЋ ОкŴħ Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵשħਙ ਙผこ

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


VAR-59522



㌱ ผ ħ⑾ γŴ ● Ŵこ γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ŵ₡

γŴ γ ħ⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ⇡こħ ₡ ʉħ γ

γħ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ ħ ผ Ŵ₡ Ŵ㌱㌱ผŴ

ਙ γ ⇡ ਙ⑾ こ ਙʉк ₡ف Ŵ₡

⇡ кħ ⑾㈠ ● ₡ ผ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ ħ

ਙ ผ ऑਙħ⇡к ⑾ਙผ ħŴ㌱㌱ผŴ㌱ħ ħ

⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ऑผ ₡ⓒ Ŵ₡ γŴ

Ŵ㌱㌱ผŴ㌱ħ ⓒ ⑾Ŵк ħ⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ਙผ

㌱ਙこऑк Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ こŴ ㌱Ŵ γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ ਙ ⇡ ผ ㈾㌱ ₡㈠ ●

ผ γ ผ ㌱ ผ ħ⑾ γŴ ● Ŵこ γ ਙʉ ผ

ਙผ ऑผ㌱γŴ ผ ӧਙผ ਙऑ ħਙ γਙк₡ ผỏ ਙ⑾

γ ऑผਙऑ ผ ħٹਙкٹ ₡ ħ γħ

Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙⓒ ਙผ γ к ਙผ Ŵف

кк Ŵ γਙผħ▷ ₡ ⇡ γ ਙʉ ผ ਙ

こŴ γħ ⇡こħħਙ㈠

A㌱㌱ ऑ

γ Ḷʉ ผ ●⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ ਙผผ ㌱

⑾ ਙⓒ ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴف

ʉγŴ

Ḷʉ ผӧỏ AＣＣŐں AＣＣŐธОǲ╗Ɔ Ő Ṳ ЌǲЋAＣA ●Ќ ں Û ḶՁҜО● ԱՁЋＣ ՁḶƆ AЌḚǲՁǲƆⓒ A ɱｘｘ″ㅡںธㅡｘں ｘธธ

ՁЋǲОՁAЌ Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵש ਙこऑŴ ╗ħשк ǲこŴħк

Ő Ŵผк ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Ɔผ ╗ ㌱γħ㌱Ŵк Ɔف こ AŴк ผ㌱Ŵผк ㌀кŴٹ فŴ ٹਙفŴ₡Ŵ㈠ٹ

A

ਙħਙ Ћħف

ħк Ҝкк

Ġ

кк

ผ Aผ㌱γħ

㌱

ผ

О㈠㈠ Оผਙ㈾

㌱

ҜŴŴف

ผ Ŵ

ਙħਙ㌀こкк

γ

кк

ผ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ธ ਙㄦ゜ธฎ゜ธｘ ںㄦｘㄦɱ ОҜ


ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㄦｘｘVAR-59522




О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ㄦｘｘ

V A

R - 5 9 5 2 2





V A R

- 5 9 5 2 2





V A R - 5 9 5 2 2





V A R

- 5 9 5 2 2



Ő Ḷ Ҝ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ ǲ A Ɔ ╗

Ő Ḷ Ҝ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Û ǲ Ɔ

╗

Ő Ḷ Ҝ ǲ A Ɔ ╗



V A

R 5 9 5 2 2





V A R 5 9 5 2 2





V

A R - 5 9 5 2 2



V A R - 5 9 5 2 2 [ P R J - 5

9 5 0 0 ] - V A R I A N C E - A P P

L I C A N T / O W N E R : P E T S ' R X N E V A D A , I N C .

1 1 1 7 N O R T H D E C A

T U R B O U L E V A R D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



Ҝкк Ġ кк ผ Aผ㌱γħ ㌱ ผ О

ɱธㅡ ОŴผ Aٹ

ƆÛ Ɔħ

Ա

Aк⇡׀

ผ׀

Ќ

ʉ Ҝ

ゥħ㌱ਙ ฎՙں

ｘธ

ㄦｘㄦ ธ″ฎ ㅡں

ㅡㅡ ∵ऑべㄦｘㄦ ธ″ฎ ㅡธㅡㅡ ∵⑾べ

ҜŴ ธฎⓒ ธｘں

ㄦ

ħ

ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћف

Ŵ Ｃ

ऑŴผ

こ

ਙ⑾ ОкŴħف

Ќ㈠ ŐŴ㌱γਙ Ｃผħٹ

ՁŴ Ћف

Ŵⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱں

ｘ″

Ő

ОŐİ ″ㄦɱㄦｘｘ

Ｃ

Ŵผ ОкŴħف

Ｃ

ऑŴผ

こ

⊿

╗γħ к

ผ ħ ħ ผ

ऑਙ

ਙ γ

Ŵऑऑผਙٹ

₡ Ɔħ

ОкŴ ⑾ਙผ ОŐİ″ㄦㄦ″ธɱⓒ Ŵ

ʉ

AħこŴк Ġਙऑħ

Ŵк кਙ㌱Ŵ

₡ Ŵں ں ں

ՙ Ќ㈠Ｃ

㌱Ŵ

ผ Աкٹ

₡ⓒ ՁŴ Ћف

Ŵⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱں

ｘฎ㈠ Ḷ ٹ

ŴผħŴ㌱

ħ

⇡

ħف

ผ׀

₡ Ŵ₡ Ŵ こħਙผ ㌱γŴف

ਙ⑾ ׀

Ŵผ

⑾ਙਙ

Ŵف

ħ ⇡

ħف

ผ׀

₡㈠

A ऑผٹ

ħਙк Ŵऑऑผਙٹ

₡ٹ

ŴผħŴ㌱

ӧㄦㄦ ″ｘỏ Ŵккਙʉ

₡ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ

㌱ਙ₡ ⑾кਙਙผ ਙ γŴٹ

Ŵ ″″ɸ

ӧħ

Ŵ₡ ਙ⑾ ฎㄦɸỏ

⇡Ŵ㌱ ⑾ผਙこ Ŵ ผ

ħ₡

ħŴк ऑผਙऑ

ผ

кħ

㈠ ╗γ

⇡ħк₡ħف

₡

ħف

γŴ ⇡

Ŵ₡㈾ ₡ ਙ Ŵкħف γ ʉ ʉŴкк ਙ⑾ γ ㌱ਙ₡ ⑾кਙਙผ ʉħ γ γ ⑾ħผ ⑾кਙਙผⓒ こŴħف ħ ں″ ɸ ⑾ผਙこγ

ผ

ħ₡

ħŴк ऑผਙऑ

ผ

кħ

㈠ Aٹ

ŴผħŴ㌱

ħ ⇡

ħف

ผ׀

₡ ਙ Ŵккਙʉ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ ″ں

ɸ ผ

ħ₡

ħŴк

Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱

㌱

⇡Ŵ㌱㈠

╗γ

׀

Ŵผ

⑾ਙਙ

Ŵف

γŴٹ

Ŵ₡㈾

₡ кħف

γ

к γผਙف

γਙ

γ

₡

ħف

ऑผਙ㌱

㈠ ╗γ

Ŵऑऑผਙٹ

₡

ħ

ऑкŴ ħ ㄦⓒ″ں

ɱ ׀

Ŵผ

⑾

ӧⓒɱธ ⑾ں

⑾кਙਙผ ں

ⓒ″ฎՙ⑾ ธ₡ ⑾кਙਙผỏ㈠ ●

γŴ ⇡

ผ

₡㌱

₡ ਙ

ㄦⓒ″ں

ՙ ⑾ ӧㅡⓒｘธｘ ⑾ں

⑾кਙਙผ ں

ⓒㄦɱՙ⑾ ธ₡ ⑾кਙਙผỏ㈠

Ɔħ㌱

ผ

кⓒ

Ҝкк Ġ кк ผ Aผ㌱γħ ㌱ ผ ⓒ О

Ｃਙف кŴ Ġ кк ผⓒ A●Aⓒ ՁǲǲＣ AО

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


VAR-59522







SUBJECT:SUP-59316 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:CAPTIVES FREE CHRISTIAN CENTER - For possible action on a request for a MajorAmendment to an approved Special Use Permit (U-0018-01) TO ADD A PARKING LOT at1329 Balzar Avenue (APNs 139-21-610-340 and 341), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential)Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59184]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]4. Photo(s) - SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]5. Justification Letter - SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPTIVES FREE CHRISTIAN CENTER


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

SUP-59316 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

SDR-59317 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-59316

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-59316 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Church/Houseof Worship use.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval Site Development PlanReview (SDR-59317) shall be required.

3. Conformance to the approved Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (U-0018-01).


5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed in

compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building andSafety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submittedfor building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.




SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR

Conditions Page Two


SDR-59317 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP-59316) shall be required, if approved.


3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan, datestamped 06/15/15, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.06.100 is hereby approved, to allow a 12-foot wide landscape buffer along the north property line where a 15-foot wide buffer is required.

5. An Exception from Title 19.08.040(F) is hereby approved, to allow 13 landscape buffertrees where 22 trees are required.

6. An Exception from Title 19.08.110(12) (a) is hereby approved, to allow four parking lotislands where six feet is required.

7. An Exception from Title 19.08.110(12) (b) is hereby approved, to allow zero parking lotlandscape island trees where 10 trees are required.


9. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submittedfor building permit.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Dedicate a 20-foot foot radius on the southwest corner of Balzar Avenue and LexingtonStreet prior to the issuance of any permits.



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR



12. Remove all substandard public street improvements and unused driveway cuts adjacent tothis site, if any, and replace with new improvements meeting current city standards

concurrent with development of this site, except as amended by conditions herein. Allexisting paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its originallocation and to its original width concurrent with development of this site. The “pan style”

driveway on Balzar Avenue may remain as long as the sidewalk path along Balzar Avenuecomplies with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines.

13. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscapingand private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so asto not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development accessdrives and abutting street intersections.

14. Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in theBalzar Avenue and Lexington Street public rights-of-way prior to this issuance of permitsfor these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of theEncroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entityon this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove propertyencroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms ofthe City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all privateimprovements in the public right-of-way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent propertyowner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of theEncroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreementwith the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-

4836).

15. Contact the City Engineer’s Office at (702-229-6272) to coordinate the development of this project with the “Lexington Street Storm Drain” project and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.

16. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits orsubmittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improveall drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of thissite shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility

improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood DrainageStudies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Major Amendment of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0018-01), for aChurch/House of Worship to add a 20-space parking lot on the southwest corner of BalzarAvenue and Lexington Street. The site consists of two separate parcels that may need to becombined into a single lot for development. A landscape buffer width Waiver and threelandscape Exceptions to allow a reduction in parking lot landscape fingers and requiredlandscaping accompany this application. The Waiver and Exceptions are minor in nature and thelayout and design of the parking lot is compatible with surrounding single-family residential

dwellings and other religious facilities in the area; therefore, staff recommends approval of this project with conditions.

ISSUES

The proposed parking lot represents a 52% increase of the previously approved Special UsePermit for a Religious facility and therefore requires a Major Amendment to the approvedSpecial Use Permit (U-0018-01).

A Site Development Plan Review is required to develop undeveloped lots into a parking lot.

The site consists of two separate lots (parcels) that may require a mapping action to be

combined into a single lot. A Waiver is required to allow a 12-foot wide landscape buffer along the northern property

line where 15 feet is required. Staff supports this Waiver.

An Exception is required to allow four parking lot islands where six feet are required. Staffsupports this Exception.

Two Exceptions are required to allow 13, 24-inch box trees where 32 are required throughoutthe site. Staff supports this Exception.



04/04/01

The City Council approved a Special Use Permit and Site Development PlanReview (U-0018-01) for a 2,340 square-foot expansion of an existingReligious facility and counseling office on the north side of Lawry Avenueapproximately 50 feet west of Lexington Street.



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR






1970 The building was constructed

10/25/04A building permit (4020820) was issued for a building addition at 1340Lawry Avenue. The permit was finalized on 11/08/05.

04/19/05A building permit (#40835) for a block wall was issued at 1340 LawryAvenue. The permit expired on 12/08/05.

05/19/05A building permit (#43145) for a two-foot block wall was issued at 1340Lawry Avenue. The permit expired on 11/29/05.


04/21/15

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant and the applicant’sdesignated representative and the following was discussed:

1. The Special Use Permit (U-0018-01) submittal requirements to expandan existing use by more than 50 percent.

2. The need for a Site Development Plan Review to develop the twoundeveloped parcels on the southwest corner of Balzar Avenue andLexington Street.

3. The need for Waivers to allow no or a reduced landscape buffer widthsalong the all property lines.4. That the project does not comply with Complete Streets Standards, but

Public Works will support a Waiver of the standards.5. The need to dedicate 15 feet along Balzar Avenue.6. An encroachment agreement is needed for all landscaping that is in the

public right-of-way.7. The possible remapping of APNs (139-21-610-340 and 341) into a

single parcel.

05/15/15

1. The submittal requirements for a major amended to an existing Special

Use Permit and a Site Development Plan Review for the proposed

parking lot.2. The need to dedicate 15 feet along Balzar Avenue.3. An encroachment agreement is needed for all landscaping that is in the

public right-of-way

4. Remapping is not technically necessary unless a building or utilizes

are going over the top of lot lines.



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR





Field Check

06/04/15Staff conducted a field check of the site. The subject site is an undevelopedlot partially fenced with a concrete masonry unit wall and chain link fencing.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.7

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property UndevelopedMLA (Medium Low

Attached DensityResidential)

R-2 (Medium-LowDensity Residential)

North

UndevelopedMLA (Medium Low



Single-Family,

Detached

MLA (Medium Low


R-2 (Medium-Low

Density Residential)

South

Church. MLA (Medium LowAttached Density

Residential)


Single-Family,Detached

EastSingle-Family,

Detached

MLA (Medium LowAttached Density

Residential)


WestSingle-Family,

Detached

MLA (Medium LowAttached Density

Residential)



West Las Vegas Plan Y





SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR




Trails N/ALas Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A




Pursuant to Title 19.08 , the following standards apply:

Landscaping and Open Space Standards

Standards Required Provided Compliance

Ratio Trees

Buffer Trees:

North

South

East

West

1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet

4 Trees4 Trees7 Trees7 Trees


N N N N

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 22 Trees 13 Trees N

Parking Area Trees1 Tree / 6 Uncovered

Spaces, plus 1 tree at theend of each row of spaces

10 Trees 0 Trees N

LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHSMin. Zone Width

North

South

East

West

15 Feet8 Feet15 Feet8 Feet


NYYY

Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y

Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Balzar Avenue Major CollectorTitle 19.04 Complete

Streets61 Feet N

Lexington Street Minor CollectorTitle 19.04 Complete

Streets51 Feet N



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR




Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Church Houseof Worship

3,434 SF N/A 18*

Parking Lot N/A N/A 0

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 18* 38 Y


*The parking requirement for this site was determined by Special Use Permit (U-0018-01).

Waivers

Requirement Request Staff Recommendation

To provide a 15-foot widelandscape buffer along the north property line.

To allow a 12-footwide landscape bufferalong the northern property line.

Approval

Exceptions Requirement Request Staff Recommendation

Provide one five-foot widelandscape finger and one 24-inch box tree throughout the parking lot (six total landscapefingers for this site) plus onetree at the end of all parkingrows.

To allow fourlandscaping fingers and provide zero trees insaid parking lot fingerand at the ends of parking rows.

Approval

Provide one 24-inch box treeevery 20 feet in all landscape

buffers (22 trees throughout thesite).

To allow 13 treesdistributed throughoutthe landscape buffers.

Approval

Proposed and existing size

Address Size Percentage of increase/decrease

Existing 1340 Lawry Avenue 0.46 Acres

Proposed 1329 Balzar Avenue 0.24 Acres 52% increase



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR



ANALYSIS

This is a request for a Major Amendment to approved Special Use Permit (U-0018-01) and a SiteDevelopment Plan Review for a 20 space parking lot within a R-2 (Medium-Low DensityResidential) zoning district. The site is located on the southwest corner of Balzar Avenue andLexington Street at 1329 Balzar Avenue. The parking lot is for the religious facility locateddirectly south of the west half of the site (APN 139-21-610-340) at 1340 Lawry Avenue. Thesize of the existing house of worship will remain unchanged; however, the use is the entire 0.42-acre site. The proposed parking lot is on a 0.24-acre site, (or a 52 percent increase) from theoriginal entitlement.

The Church/House of Worship use is defined by Title 19.18 as: “Any building used for religiousworship services, religious education and fellowship activities and programs of a religious

organization. This use includes the use of the building and premises for other related activities,such as child care facilities, formal educational programs, preschool classes and recreationalactivities but only when those activities are ancillary to the religious use and only after those useshave been approved by means of a use review or other procedure under LVMC Chapter 19.16.This use does not include any class of child care center, general education classroom or facility,thrift shop, homeless shelter or commercial activity.”

The applicant meets the definition of a Church/House of Worship, as the existing church willcontinue to operate at the current location. The expansion of the use is for the parking lot directlyto the north only.

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:1. The Special Use Permit approval may include such activities as religious services,

religious instruction, church club activities and similar activities.

An additional Public hearing will be required prior to the addition of any uses to thereligious facility.

2. The Special Use Permit approval may also include accessory functions, such as childcare facilities, formal educational programs, preschool classes and similar relatedactivities, if:

a. The uses are specifically proposed in the application; and b. The Director finds that each such use is ancillary to the primary use.

This requirement will be met, as the existing services offered by the church will remainunchanged and any future condition changes will be reviewed if/when they arise.

3. Following approval of a Special Use Permit, if any additional uses not specificallycovered by that Special Use Permit are proposed, an additional public hearing processshall be required to add the uses.



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR

Staff Report Page Seven


An additional public hearing will be required prior to the addition of any uses to thereligious facility.

* 4. In residential districts, related uses such as thrift shops, homeless shelters and othersimilar activities may not be conducted and are not eligible for approval as part of aSpecial Use Permit. Such uses may be conducted only in the zoning districts in whichsuch uses are permitted as primary uses, and must receive specific approval to operate.

This requirement will continue to be met, as the existing religious facility has existed atthis location for over 15 years without conducting these activities.

* 5. Churches on sites larger than 5 acres shall not be permitted in the U District or adistrict with an “R” prefix.

This condition does not apply, as the site is 0.70 acres and located in a R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) zoning district.

The site is located in close proximity to other civic uses. Kermit Booker Elementary, JohnsonPark and 13 religious facilities are within a two block radius of the site. Although this property isnot in the Redevelopment area (it is about one block to the east of it and) there is need foradequate parking. This development is consistent with the Las Vegas Redevelopment ObjectiveF, which states that there is a need for “adequate land for parking and open space.” Thisdevelopment plan will provide 20 additional parking spaces for the house of worship located at1340 Lawry Avenue. The parking lot layout is 60 degree angled parking with a 16-foot drive

aisle.

Per Title 19.08.040 (F) (9) Buffer Zone Encroachments: The following encroachments are permitted within required buffer zones:

a. Driveways (curb cuts) that are located perpendicular or approximately perpendicular tothe street right-of-way. b. Sidewalks that are located perpendicular or approximately perpendicular to the streetright-of-way.

An eight-foot wide portion of the southern landscape buffer width narrows to five feet along thesouthern property line. This deviation is acceptable, as it is a curb cut that allows access from the

church parking lot to the south. There is a landscape Waiver to allow a 12-foot wide landscape buffer along the northern property line where 15 feet is required. Staff supports the requestedlandscape Waiver, as the two-foot (or 13 percent) deficiency is mitigated by the eight-footdistance separation between the northern property line and the public right-of-way (BalzarAvenue). Also, the applicant has requested three Exceptions. The first two are to allow four parking lot islands with no trees where six fingers and 10 trees are required. The third Exceptionis to allow 13, 24-inch box trees in the landscape buffers throughout the site where 22 arerequired. The trees utilized are Screwbean Mesquite, which is native to the Southwest and the



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR

Staff Report Page Eight


Valley. The shade canopy provided by this species of tree is equivalent to having a tree spaced25-foot apart. The shrub utilized is the Texas Sage, which can provide a six to eight-foot grayish

green screen. Staff supports the requested Exceptions as they are minor in nature. The use ofdrought tolerant and/or native vegetation is a visual improvement to the undeveloped dirt lot. Inshort, the applicant has successfully ensured that this project is consistent with West Las VegasPlan Objective 2.1.2, which states “The development on vacant or underutilized lots withinexisting residential neighborhoods is sensitive in use and design to surrounding development.”

Title 19.08.040(G)(2)a states that, “For commercial and industrial properties, a perimeter wallshall be constructed adjacent to any residential zoning district or property used solely forresidential purposes, shall be a minimum of six feet in height, and in no case shall exceed theheight limitation applicable to the adjacent zoning district or property. In all other cases, there isno requirement to construct a wall or fence. However, all perimeter or screen walls and fences

must comply with applicable building code requirements. The height of a wall or fence shall bemeasured from the side with the greatest vertical exposure above finished grade.” There is a six-foot block wall along the southern property line and a block wall along the west property linesteps up to six feet. The applicant will provide a six-foot wrought iron fence along the east property line and a five-foot wrought iron fence along the north property line. The applicant has proposed shrubs that should adequately screen the parking lot providing a minimum six-foot tallgreen screen provided the shrubs are allowed to grow.

Per Title 19.04.010 (B)2 states: “Where a proposed development is adjacent to existingimprovements, the Director of Public Works shall determine the extent to which it is appropriateto implement the standards outlined in this Chapter and approve, if necessary, designs for the

transition from existing improvements to those that meet the standards of this Chapter. ” PublicWorks has agreed to allow this development to match the existing sidewalk with no amenityzone.

The overall project is consistent with code requirements and will be an improvement to the area.The parking lot can be constructed in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with theexisting and future land uses. Staff recommends approval of both applications; however, ifdenied the existing house of worship can remain in operation, but the parking lot cannot beconstructed as submitted.

FINDINGS (SUP-59316)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the PlanningCommission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and

compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding land

uses as projected by the General Plan.



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR

Staff Report Page Nine


If approved, the proposed expansion of an existing religious facility is compatible with theexisting and surrounding land uses. This project will provide additional on-site parking for

the church to the south. Additionally, this project will visually improve the streetexperience by providing splashes of color and shade along Balzar Avenue and LexingtonStreet throughout the year. The proposed development can be conducted in a harmoniousand compatible manner with existing neighboring land uses as projected by the GeneralPlan.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

The subject site is physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed use, as design of the parking lot and selected vegetation is a welcome change to the existing undeveloped lot.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate insize to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Ingress to the site is provided from Lawry Avenue, (a 60-foot Minor Collector), withegress provided from Balzar Avenue (an 80-foot Major Collector), as defined by Title 19.Both streets can accommodate the proposed use.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent with

or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the

General Plan.

Approval of this Special Use Permit will positively affect the quality of life or welfare ofthe residents of the surrounding neighborhood for the proposed project complies with theWest Las Vegas Plan’s Objective 2.1.2, which states “The development on vacant orunderutilized lots within existing residential neighborhoods is sensitive in use and designto surrounding development.” The parking lot will upgrade the quality of life in West LasVegas by providing shade along the sidewalks on Lexington Street and Balzar Avenue.All other public health and safety concerns will be addressed, as the parking lot will besubject to inspections throughout the building permit process.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed use meets all the Title 19.12 Special Use Permit requirements for aChurch/House of Worship use.

FINDINGS (SDR-59317)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) thePlanning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR

Staff Report Page Ten


1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;

Development along this portion of Balzar Avenue and Lexington Street consists mainly ofresidential or civic uses. The design of this parking lot is compatible with neighborhoodand surrounding land uses.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the Design

Standards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-

adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is mostly compliant with City plans and standards. Theapplicant has requested a landscape buffer width Waiver, two parking lot landscape design

Exceptions and one landscape tree quantity Exception. Staff supports the Waiver, as theexisting right-of-way is set back eight feet allowing for a 20-foot wide landscape buffer between the public right-of-way and the parking lot. Staffs supports the landscapeExceptions, as the vegetation specified on the landscape plan will adequately screen and orshade the parking lot and adjacent sidewalk, provided the plant material is allowed togrow.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;

Site access and circulation will improve, as up to 20 additional vehicles will not be parked

on the street. Ingress to the site is provided from Lawry Avenue, (a 60-foot MinorCollector), with egress provided from Balzar Avenue (an 80-foot Major Collector), asdefined by Title 19. The proposed circulation will not negatively impact either street.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The landscape materials utilized are appropriate for the area and exceed that found onmany religious facilities in the City and throughout the valley. The plant material will provide splashes of yellow flowers in the springs and purple flowers from spring to fall.Organic linear sphere like seed pods will appear during the fall. The plant material isnative to the Mojave Desert or drought tolerant and therefore appropriate for the area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an

orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatible

with development in the area;

The proposed parking lot characteristics landscape materials appropriate for the area. The parking lot characteristics and aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable or



SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 [PRJ-59184]

MR

Staff Report Page Eleven


obnoxious in appearance. The vegetation utilized is native to area and/or drought tolerant.The proposed parking lot will be visual improvement to the area and should be compatible

with the existing neighborhood and surrounding area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety and

general welfare.

Site development will be subject to permits and inspection, thereby safeguarding the publichealth, safety and general welfare.


NOTICES MAILED 252

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



A ǲ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ●Ќ A Ќ ●A Ձ ●Ќ ǲŐ Ա ฌ

Ŵ こ ⇡ ผ

A О Ќฌ

ਙ

γ

⇡ ਙ⑾

ਙผ

ਙʉ к ₡ف ⓒ

ਙ γ

Ҝ Ŵਙผ

ਙผŴここ ⇡ ผ

⑾ γ

ħ

ਙ㌱ħкਙผฌ

О кŴħف

ਙここ ħħਙ

Ŵٹ

⑾ħŴ㌱ħŴк

ผ

γħ

ਙผŴਙ γ ผ

ผਙऑ ผ

ħ γ

γ ฌ

ऑผਙऑ ผ

ʉ ผⓒऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ⓒ

γ

ผਙऑ ผ

ʉ ผ

ผŴऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ਙ ผŴк

ผкħこ ħ ₡ऑŴผ ผⓒ

ผ

Ŵ

⑾⑾ħ㌱ ผ⑾ γ ħผਙผऑਙผŴ ħਙ

ผ

кħこ ħ ₡

ħŴ⇡ħкħ

㌱ਙこ ऑŴ﹒

ฎゥਙฌ

к⑾

ⓒऑк Ŵ

₡ħ㌱Ŵ

γ ここ ⇡ ผ

⑾ γ

ħ

ਙ㌱ħкผО кŴħف

ਙここ ħħਙγਙ

ħฌ

ħٹਙкٹ ₡₡кħ

γ Ŵこ ӧỏ

⑾

γ

ผਙ

ผ

ऑ ผਙ

ħ γʉ γ ਙこ

γ

ħ

Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴкγਙк₡ฌ

Ŵ

ħ ผ ㈠

кਙкħ

γ A ਙผƥ

Ŵผ㌱ кこ ⇡ ผ

⑾

γ

ผਙऑ ผ

ʉ γħ㌱γ

γ

ผ

γ к₡

₡ħ⑾⑾ ผ ผਙこ

γ

Ŵ

Ŵผ㌱ к㈠ฌ

ħ Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴкฌ

О Ŵผ ผӧỏ

ฌ

A О Ќฌ

ħفŴ ผ

⑾

О ผਙऑ ผ

Ḷ ʉ ผ

⇡㌱ผħ⇡ ₡₡

ʉ ਙผ⇡ ⑾ਙผ

ฌ

О ผħ

Ќ Ŵผ

ผγħ

⇓ŴⓈ ਙ

Ŵ₡ Ŵ ฌ

Ḷ ǲ ২A Ő

Ḛ Ⓢ ●

Ő Ő ǲ Ύ Ḛ

ΎҜ A Ќ ฌ

Ќ Ḷ A Ő

Ⓢ Ա Ձ●

A ǲ

ǲ Ћ A Ｃ A ฌ

кк

ਙここ ħħਙ

ゥऑħผ

к

ธں ｘ

ผ ħ⑾ħŴ

ਙ

кں

″ ں

к

Ő ںħ ₡кٹ ㅡ ｘ″

⑾

⇓₡ ऑਙ ⇓A ऑऑк

㌱Ŵ ħਙ

Ŵ㌱ Ձ Ŵ こ

⑾ħŴ㌱ħŴк

ผ ㈠

₡⑾

ｘㄦ゜ ฎ゜ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎㅡ

SUP-59316



Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ Ќこ⇡ ผ ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎㅡ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ゜О ħ ħਙ ਙผ ҜŴ ㈾ਙผ Ŵこ ₡こ ਙ ゥħ ħ ƆⓈО Ŵ₡ ŴƆＣŐ

Оผਙ ㈾㌱ A₡₡ผ ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙỏ ธɱ Ա AՁΎ AŐ A ЋǲЌⓈǲ

Оผਙ ㈾㌱ ЌŴこ

ОAŐ●ЌḚ ՁḶ╗ AЌＣ ՁAЌＣƆ AО●ЌḚ ՁA ḶⓈ╗ ОՁAЌ ḶŐ AО╗●Ћ

A ਙผ ОŴผ㌱ к ӧỏ ɱ ธ ″ ｘ ㅡｘⓒ ɱธ ″ ｘ ㅡ

ÛŴผ₡ ÛAŐＣㄦ ӧŐ●● ㈠ Ա AŐՁḶÛỏ


ਙผผ ㌱

⑾ ਙⓒ ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴ ʉγŴ

Ḛ

ผŴк ОкŴ Ｃ ħ Ŵ

ħਙ Оผਙऑਙ ₡ Ɔ

к

㌱

Ύਙħ Ｃħ ผħ㌱ Оผਙऑਙ ₡ Ɔ к ㌱

Ḛผਙ A㌱ผ ㈠ธㅡ

Ձਙ Ⓢħ

ธ

A₡₡ ħ ħਙŴк ●⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħผ ЌŴこ γਙผਙʉ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Aкħ γ㌱γħ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ A₡₡ผ ｘ ธ ҜŴ Ŵ ਙผ₡Ŵ ՁŴ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ɔ Ŵ Ќ Ŵ₡Ŵٹ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ύħऑ ฎɱ

ธฎ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Оγਙ ՙｘธธ ธㅡՙㄦฎ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ŵゥ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ǲこŴħк ผħ γ ㌀㌱ਙゥ㈠

Ő ऑ ħผ ЌŴこ γਙผਙʉ

Ő ऑ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Aкħ γ㌱γħ

Ő ऑ A₡₡ผ ｘ ธ ҜŴ Ŵ ਙผ₡Ŵ ՁŴ

Ő

ऑ ħ

ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵ

Ő ऑ Ɔ Ŵ Ќ Ŵ₡Ŵٹ

Ő

ऑ Ύħऑ ฎɱ ธฎ

Ő ऑ Оγਙ ӧ ՙｘธỏ ธ ธ ㅡՙㄦฎ

Ő ऑ Ŵゥ

Ő ऑ ǲこŴħк ผħ γ ㌀㌱ਙゥ㈠

ОŴ ㄦں ฎ゜ธｘں ゜ㄦںㄦ ɱ ں″ AҜ


ｘㄦ゜

ฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎㅡSUP-59316 and SDR-59317






ਙ γ ⇡ ਙ⑾ こ ਙʉк ₡ Ŵ₡

⇡ кħ ⑾㈠ ● ₡ ผ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ ħ








Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙⓒ ਙผ γ к ਙผ Ŵ



A㌱㌱ ऑ


⑾ ਙⓒ ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴ ʉγŴ

Ḷʉ ผӧỏ AＣＣŐں AＣＣŐธAО╗●ЋǲƆ ŐǲǲĠŐ●Ɔ╗● AЌ

ǲЌ╗ǲŐ

ธՙㅡ Ɔ AԱǲŐ ＣŐ ЌḶŐ╗Ġ ՁAƆ ЋǲḚ AƆⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎɱｘ ธ


Ő

Ŵผк ħ

ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵ Ɔผ ╗

㌱γħ㌱Ŵк Ɔ こ AŴк ผ㌱Ŵผк ㌀кŴٹ Ŵ ٹ

Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ ਙٹ

γਙผਙʉ Aкħ γ㌱γħ ҜŴऑ ゥ ǲ ħ ผ ผħ γ ㌀㌱ਙゥ㈠

Őਙ⇡

ผ Ҝਙผ

Ŵ ผこਙผ

Ŵ″ ｘ㌀Ŵਙк㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ธ ਙㄦ゜ ںฎ゜ธｘ ںㄦㄦ ɱ ں″ AҜ


ｘㄦ゜

ฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎㅡSUP-59316 and SDR-59317



ｘ ″ ゜ㄦ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ฎ ㅡ

S U P 5 9 3 1 6 d S

D R 5 9 3 1 7 R E V

I S E D



S U P - 5 9 3 1 6

[ P R J -

5 9 1 8 4 ] -

S P E C I A L

U S E

P E R M I T

R E L A T E D

T O

S D R - 5 9 3 1 7

- A P P L I C A

N T / O W N E R :

C A P T I V E S F R E E C H R I S T I A N C E N T E R

1 3 2 9 B A L Z A R A V E N U E

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



İ ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ к ผ ⑾ਙผ ㌱ਙ ผ㌱ ħਙ⊿

Ő ⑾⊿ ਙ㌱ ऑ Ŵк ऑŴผħف кਙ Ŵ₡ кŴ₡㌱Ŵऑħف кŴਙ ऑкŴ ⑾ਙผ Ŵऑ ħٹ ผ γผħ ħŴ ผ ħ

кਙ㌱Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ٹㅡｘ ՁŴʉผ Aں ⓒ ՁŴ Ћ ″ｘںŴⓒ ЌЋ㈠ ฎɱف AОЌ ںɱ ธں ｘں″ ㅡｘⓒ Ŵ₡ ㅡں ħ

ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵⓒ Ќف Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ٹ

Ｃ Ŵผ ҜŴ₡Ŵこ゜Ɔħผ⊿

╗γ Ŵऑ ħٹ ผ γผħ ħŴ ผ ₡ ゥ ผŴ ऑŴผħف кਙ ਙ ऑ ㌱Ŵผ ਙ⑾⑾ γ ผ ㈠ ╗γ

ऑผਙऑਙ ऑŴผħف ʉħкк ⇡ кਙ㌱Ŵ ₡ ਙ ʉਙ Ŵ㌱Ŵٹ кਙ Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱ ਙ γ ㌱γผ㌱γ ਙ γ ਙผ γ ħ₡ ⓒ

ऑк Ŵ γ ㌱ਙ㌱ ऑ Ŵк ऑкŴ ⇡こħ ₡ ʉħ γ γħ ऑŴ㌱Ŵف ㈠ AऑऑผਙゥħこŴ к ธｘ㌱Ŵผ ʉħкк ⇡ Ŵ⇡к

ਙ ऑŴผ ਙ γ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ऑŴผħف кਙ ㈠ ╗γħ ʉħкк ผ ₡㌱ γ ผ ऑŴผħفⓒ Ŵ₡ ㌱γผ㌱γ Ŵ ₡ ʉħкк

㈾ਙ ਙħ ऑŴผħف ऑผਙٹħ₡ ₡㈠ Û Ŵผ Ŵкਙ ผ ธں Ŵف ħ׀ ⑾ਙਙ ʉħ₡ кŴ₡㌱Ŵऑ ⇡⑾⑾ ผ Ŵкਙف

ԱŴк▷Ŵผ Aٹ ㈠ ╗γŴ ਙ ⑾ਙผ Ŵħف ㌱Ŵผ ਙ⑾ γ こŴ ผ㈠ ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ ׀ ħਙ ㌱ਙ Ŵ㌱こ㈠

Ɔħ㌱ ผ кⓒ●⑾ ਙ γŴٹ Ŵ ħਙ ऑк Ŵ׀ ⑾ к ⑾ผ ਙ ㌱Ŵкк Ҝผ㈠ Őਙ⇡ ผ Ҝਙผ فŴ İผ Ŵ ӧՙｘธỏ ธՙՙ

″ㄦｘ㈠ ╗γŴ ਙ㈠

Ɔħ㌱ ผ к

ਙ▷ Aкħفγ㌱γħ

ҜŴऑ ゥ ǲفħ ผħف

ＣŴ ｘ″゜゜ธｘں ㄦں

ｘ″゜

ㄦ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎㅡ

SUP-59316 and SDR-59317 - REVISED







SUBJECT:SDR-59317 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-59316 - PUBLICHEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CAPTIVES FREE CHRISTIAN CENTER - For possibleaction on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PARKING LOT WITH AWAIVER TO ALLOW A 12-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO PUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY on 0.24 acres at 1329 Balzar Avenue (APNs 139-21-610-340 and 341), R-2(Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59184]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

MAY GO TO CITY COUNCIL ON 8/19/2015OR MAY BE FINAL ACTION (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)




RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation



Consistent with the City’s

sustainability efforts to reduce

paper use, backup

documentation pertaining to

related items will appear as

backup under the first item. This

item includes such consolidated

backup documentation. Pleaserefer to the first related

application in the subject line of

the Agenda Summary Page.



A ǲ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ●Ќ A Ќ ●A Ձ ●Ќ ǲŐ Ա ฌ

Ŵ こ ⇡ ผ

A О Ќฌ

ਙ

γ

⇡ ਙ⑾

ਙผ

ਙʉ к ₡ف ⓒ

ਙ γ

Ҝ Ŵਙผ

ਙผŴここ ⇡ ผ

⑾ γ

ħ

ਙ㌱ħкਙผฌ

О кŴħف

ਙここ ħħਙ

Ŵٹ

⑾ħŴ㌱ħŴк

ผ

γħ

ਙผŴਙ γ ผ

ผਙऑ ผ

ħ γ

γ ฌ

ऑผਙऑ ผ

ʉ ผⓒऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ⓒ

γ

ผਙऑ ผ

ʉ ผ

ผŴऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ਙ ผŴк

ผкħこ ħ ₡ऑŴผ ผⓒ

ผ

Ŵ

⑾⑾ħ㌱ ผ⑾ γ ħผਙผऑਙผŴ ħਙ

ผ

кħこ ħ ₡

ħŴ⇡ħкħ

㌱ਙこ ऑŴ﹒

ฎゥਙฌ

к⑾

ⓒऑк Ŵ

₡ħ㌱Ŵ

γ ここ ⇡ ผ

⑾ γ

ħ

ਙ㌱ħкผО кŴħف

ਙここ ħħਙγਙ

ħฌ

ħٹਙкٹ ₡₡кħ

γ Ŵこ ӧỏ

⑾

γ

ผਙ

ผ

ऑ ผਙ

ħ γʉ γ ਙこ

γ

ħ

Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴкγਙк₡ฌ

Ŵ

ħ ผ ㈠

кਙкħ

γ A ਙผƥ

Ŵผ㌱ кこ ⇡ ผ

⑾

γ

ผਙऑ ผ

ʉ γħ㌱γ

γ

ผ

γ к₡

₡ħ⑾⑾ ผ ผਙこ

γ

Ŵ

Ŵผ㌱ к㈠ฌ

ħ Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴкฌ

О Ŵผ ผӧỏ

ฌ

A О Ќฌ

ħفŴ ผ

⑾

О ผਙऑ ผ

Ḷ ʉ ผ

⇡㌱ผħ⇡ ₡₡

ʉ ਙผ⇡ ⑾ਙผ

ฌ

О ผħ

Ќ Ŵผ

ผγħ

⇓ŴⓈ ਙ

Ŵ₡ Ŵ ฌ

Ḷ ǲ ২A Ő

Ḛ Ⓢ ●

Ő Ő ǲ Ύ Ḛ

ΎҜ A Ќ ฌ

Ќ Ḷ A Ő

Ⓢ Ա Ձ●

A ǲ

ǲ Ћ A Ｃ A ฌ

кк

ਙここ ħħਙ

ゥऑħผ

к

ธں ｘ

ผ ħ⑾ħŴ

ਙ

кں

″ ں

к

Ő ںħ ₡кٹ ㅡ ｘ″

⑾

⇓₡ ऑਙ ⇓A ऑऑк

㌱Ŵ ħਙ

Ŵ㌱ Ձ Ŵ こ

⑾ħŴ㌱ħŴк

ผ ㈠

₡⑾

ｘㄦ゜ ฎ゜ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎㅡ

SDR-59317







SUBJECT:SUP-59482 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:WES ISBUTT -OWNER: ARTS FACTORY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment toan approved Special Use Permit (SUP-37385) FOR A PROPOSED 5,663 SQUARE-FOOTOUTDOOR PATIO ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 1,385 SQUARE-FOOT URBANLOUNGE at 107 East Charleston Boulevard, Suite #155 (APNs 139-33-811-017 and 139-34-410-046), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58638]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:



1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 [PRJ-58638]2. Special Map3. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 [PRJ-58638]4. Supporting Documentation - SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 [PRJ-58638]5. Photo(s) - SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 [PRJ-58638]6. Justification Letter - SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 [PRJ-58638]7. Support Postcards - SUP-59482 and SUP-59483 [PRJ-58638]



SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 [PRJ-58638]

JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT:WES ISBUTT - OWNER: ARTS FACTORY, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

SUP-59482 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:


SDR-59480 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-59482

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit (SUP-37385) shall berequired, except as amended herein.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development PlanReview (SDR-59480) shall be required.






JB

Conditions Page Two



for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.

6. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquorsor wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.

7. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.

8. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las VegasMunicipal Code.



Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Mixed Usedevelopment land use.








JB




Planning


2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, dated stamped06/22/15 and building elevations, date stamped 05/27/15, except as amended by conditions

herein.

3. A Waiver from Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape Design standards ishereby approved, to allow no five-foot amenity zone and 10-foot sidewalk adjacent to thesubject site.



for building permit.


7. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine themost appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mappingaction shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.

8. The Building and Safety Department will approve occupancy of the patio area based upon

the engineer’s letter. This occupancy will be for 90 days beginning today. Therefore allland use entitlements, building plan submittal and review, permits obtained and anyconstruction work needed to bring the patio into building and technical code compliancewill be completed by September 2, 2015. In that this facility was built without permitsthere will be no latitude for any extension of this 90 occupancy beyond September 2, 2015.Compliance with the Building Code is of critical importance to ensure the long term safetyof occupants of this patio area with the minimal levels of safety prescribed by the Codes.




JB

Conditions Page Four


The completion of all work is defined by the approval of final building inspections by our

Department in accordance with our normal procedures of licensed contractors performingthe work required and requesting inspections at the appropriate times. Failure to resolve allissues related to this non-permitted work with final inspection approval within the 90 daytime frame will result in immediate withdrawal of occupancy of this area.

9. All site necessary site improvements must be satisfied to comply with the Las VegasValley Water District (LVVWD) utility access requirements:

a. The applicant shall draw up a plan of how they will modify the existing structureslocated on the subject site to provide access to LVVWD and submit it to LVVWDfor approval.

b. Remove the permanent obstructions (raised concrete patio, awnings, fencing) from

directly on top of the water facilities, leaving a 12-foot wide drivable surface overthe water facilities.

c. The entry gate to the subject property shall be chained closed with a LVVWD lockon it for 24-hour LVVWD access.

d. The below-ground vault shall be abandoned and a new backflow preventionassembly (above ground) shall be installed adjacent to the existing building wall.

e. All permanent patio fixtures shall be replaced with tables/chairs/umbrellas at gradeand easily removed where required, in the event an emergency repair is required.

f. No walls, fences, buildings, trees or structures to be placed within the easementwithout prior written consent from LVVWD.


Public Works

11. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks adjacentto this site in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if any, to thesatisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.

12. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. Alllandscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and

maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at alldevelopment access drives and abutting street intersections.

13. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services todiscuss fire requirements for this Site Plan Prior to submittal of construction drawings forthis site.




JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review and Major Amendment to an approvedSpecial Use Permit (SUP-37385) to allow an additional 5,663 square-foot outdoor seating area inconjunction with an existing 1,385 square-foot Urban Lounge at 107 East Charleston Boulevard,Suite #155. In addition, the applicant has also requested a Special Use Permit to convert the building to a Mixed-Use development in order to allow a residential use on the second floor ofthe building, in conjunction with the existing commercial land uses at the subject site.

The proposed outdoor plaza area is located on the eastern perimeter of the existing building

located at 107 East Charleston Boulevard and was previously utilized as a parking lot. The proposed expansion of the Urban Lounge land use meets all Title 19 requirements and can beconducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the neighborhood and adjacentcommercial uses; therefore, the Department of Planning recommends approval this applicationwith conditions.

ISSUES

The expansion of an existing Special Use Permit by more than fifty percent of the approvedfloor area is considered a Major Amendment and cannot be approved administratively pursuant

to Title 19.16.110(M)(1)(a). A Site Development Plan Review is required for the conversion of what was previously

utilized as a parking lot into an outdoor pedestrian plaza area for an existing Urban Lounge.

The proposed outdoor plaza area currently has been developed with patio shade structureswhich have been installed without proper building permits.

There is an existing Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) utility easement which runs between the two subject parcels which contains public water mains, valves, vaults andmultiple services, which require access by the LVVWD.



c. 1947 The existing structure at 107 East Charleston Boulevard was constructed.

12/21/83The City Council approved a request for a Variance (V-0111-83) to allow thesale of used furniture at 107 East Charleston Boulevard. The Board of ZoningAdjustment recommended approval of the request.




JB




01/19/00

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-0122-99) ona property located at 107 East Charleston Boulevard for a 14 foot by 48 footOff-Premise sign. The Planning Commission recommended approval of therequest.

01/08/03The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-1146) for a RestaurantService Bar at 103 East Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commissionrecommended approval of the request.

09/20/06

The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-15038) request for a proposed Gaming Establishment, General Business-Related at 103-123 EastCharleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval ofthe request.

The City Council approved a Site Development Review (SDR-15035) requestfor a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed 4,930 square-foot UrbanLounge and waivers of Downtown Centennial Plan streetscape and build-to-line standards on 0.13 acres at 103-123 East Charleston Boulevard. ThePlanning Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.

The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-15039) request for a proposed Urban Lounge at 103-123 East Charleston Boulevard. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval of the request.

06/04/08

The City Council approved a request for a Waiver (WVR-26441) of Title18.12.130 to allow First Street to terminate in a dead end street where a cul-de-sac is required at the southeast corner of First Street and Boulder Avenue.

The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request.The City Council approved a request for a Vacation (VAC-26443) to VacateBoulder Avenue between First Street and Casino Center Boulevard, the alleygenerally located at the northwest corner of Boulder Avenue and CasinoCenter Boulevard, and a portion of the west side of Casino Center Boulevardlocated between Coolidge Avenue and Boulder Avenue.

08/28/08

The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-29021) for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development PlanReview (SDR-15035) to modify the building elevations and placement of a proposed Urban Lounge on 0.13 acres at 123 East Charleston Boulevard.

11/05/08

The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-29992)of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-15038) for a proposed GamingEstablishment, General Business-Related at 103-123 East CharlestonBoulevard that expires 09/20/10.

11/05/08The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-29994)of an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-15039) for a proposed UrbanLounge at 103-123 East Charleston Boulevard that expires 09/20/10.




JB




01/22/09

The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment to an approved Site

Development Plan Review (SDR-32544) to an approved Site DevelopmentPlan Review (SDR-29021) to add a pedestrian plaza with a Waiver of theDowntown Centennial Plan Streetscape Standards on 0.70 acres at 123 EastCharleston Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request.

11/05/09

The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-36190) to anapproved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-29021) to allow a reductionin building area, setbacks and overall height of an approved Urban Lounge at123 East Charleston Boulevard. Staff recommended approval of the request.

04/21/10

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-37385)for a proposed 1,385 square-foot Urban Lounge at 107 East CharlestonBoulevard, Suite #155. The Planning Commission recommended approval of

the request on 03/25/10.




01/21/03 A business license (C11-07412) was issued for a contractor license at 107East Charleston Boulevard Suite #150. The license is still active.

08/05/94 A business license (Q09-00053) was issued for architectural studios at 107East Charleston Boulevard Suite #150. The license is still active.

06/14/99 A building permit (#99011645) was issued for tenant improvement at 107East Charleston Boulevard Suite #150. The permit expired on 12/24/99.

03/04/15

A Code Enforcement case (#151182) was processed for a outside patio beingused without a Special Use Permit. The case was resolved on 03/04/15.

A Code Enforcement case (#151187) was processed for a outside patio beingused with a Special Use Permit. The case has not been resolved.


04/01/15A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant, where the submittalrequirements for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Special UsePermit for an existing Tavern Limited Establishment were discussed.


A neighborhood meeting is not required for this application, nor was one held.




JB



Field Check

06/04/15

During a routine site inspection performed by staff, the subject property wascurrently being utilized as an outdoor plaza with alcohol service for anexisting Urban Lounge. In addition, the proposed area for the outdoor plazahas shade structures which currently do not have building permits.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.73

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property

Urban Lounge C (Commercial)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

General Retail C (Commercial)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

North Urban Lounge MXU (Mixed Use)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

South General Retail C (Commercial)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

East Undeveloped C (Commercial) C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

West General Retail C (Commercial)C-2 (GeneralCommercial)


Downtown Centennial Plan – 18b Las Vegas Art District Y


Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay District – 18b Las Vegas Art District Y

Live/Work Overlay District Y

Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance Trails N/A







JB




Title 19.10.110 exempts properties within the Downtown Centennial Plan area from theautomatic application of building height limitations, setbacks, lot coverage, residentialadjacency, standard landscaping requirements, and standard parking requirements. TheCentennial Plan addresses certain site development standards, which are detailed below:

Pursuant to Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan – 18b Las Vegas Arts District, the

following standards apply:


Min. Setbacks

Front

Side (west) Side (east)

Rear

N/A Feet N/A Feet N/A Feet N/A Feet


YYYY

Max. Lot Coverage N/A % 73 % Y

Max. Building Height N/A Feet 28 Feet Y

Streetscape Standards Required Provided Compliance

Downtown Centennial Plan

5-foot wide amenity zone 5-foot N*

10-foot wide sidewalk 10 Feet N*

36-inch box trees at 15 to20 feetintervals along 7th Streetand CarsonAvenue.

0 Trees (existing) N*

A Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscape standards is required to allow theexisting five- foot sidewalk along Art Way and Boulder Avenue and a 10’ wide sidewalk alongCharleston Boulevard to remain; with no amenity zone along Charleston Boulevard and Boulder Avenue, and a three-foot amenity zone along Art Way.

Street Name FunctionalClassification of

Street(s)

Governing Document Actual Street Width

(Feet)

Compliancewith Street

Section

CharlestonBoulevard

Primary ArterialMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways100 Feet Y

Boulder Avenue Major CollectorMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways80 Feet Y




JB



Parking Requirement – Downtown -18b Las Vegas Arts District

Use

Gross Floor

Area or Number of

Units

Provided Compliance

Parking

RegularHandi-capped

Mixed-Use 23,114 SF

Open AirPlaza

5,663 SF

TOTAL SPACES

REQUIRED 16

Y*

Regular and Handicap

Spaces Required 16

Y*

*Projects located within the Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan area are not subject to theautomatic application of parking requirements. However, the above table should be used to illustratethe requirements of an analogous project in another location in the City.

Waivers


To provide a five-foot amenityzone and a ten-foot wide

sidewalk per Graphic 11 of theDowntown Centennial Plan

To allow a five-foot widesidewalk along Casino CenterBoulevard, a five-foot widesidewalk along Boulder Avenueand a 10-foot wide sidewalk along

Charleston Boulevard.

Approval

To provide a five-foot amenityzone and a ten-foot wide

sidewalk per Graphic 11 of theDowntown Centennial Plan

To allow no landscape amenityarea along Charleston Boulevardand Boulder Avenue, and a three-foot wide landscape amenity areaalong Art Way.

Approval

ANALYSIS

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-49480) and Major Amendment

(SUP-59482) to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-37385) to allow an additional 5,663square-foot outdoor seating area to an existing 1,385 square-foot Urban Lounge at 107 EastCharleston Boulevard, Suite #155. The proposed outdoor plaza area is located on the eastern perimeter of the existing building located at 107 East Charleston Boulevard on a parcel of landwhich was previously utilized as a parking lot and is surrounded by a decorative wrought ironfence which is approximately 42-inches in height. Over time the subject site has been developedto operate as an open air plaza area which operates as an accessory to the existing Urban Loungeon the subject site; however the area was never properly entitled and building permits were neverissued for the existing structures on the site.




JB



The applicant has requested a Waiver of the Downtown Centennial Plan Streetscapedevelopment standards which require the installation of a five-foot amenity zone and a ten-foot

wide sidewalk around the subject site. The applicant has requested that the existing streetscapeconditions remain; which provides a five-foot wide sidewalk along Casino Center Boulevard, afive-foot wide sidewalk along Boulder Avenue, a 10-foot wide sidewalk along CharlestonBoulevard and no landscape amenity area along Charleston Boulevard and Boulder Avenue anda three-foot wide landscape amenity area along Art Way.

An Urban Lounge is defined by Title 19 as “an establishment that is licensed for the sale ofalcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises where the same are sold, and the sale, toconsumers only and not for resale, of alcoholic beverages in original sealed or corked containers,for consumption off the premises where the same are sold.” To qualify as an Urban Lounge, the

proposed use must meet all three minimum Special Use Permit requirements:

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements

1. The use is limited to the area located within the boundaries of the Las Vegas Arts District, asdescribed in the Downtown Centennial Plan and as amended from time to time.

The subject site is located within the boundaries of the 18b Las Vegas Arts District as depicted inthe Las Vegas Downtown Centennial Plan

2. For each seat provided at the bar of the establishment, there must be a minimum of 2 seatswithin a lounge area located away from the bar.

The floor plan associated with the approved Special Use Permit (SUP-37385) indicated nine seats are provided adjacent to the bar area with 27 additional seats located away from the bararea in the interior tenant space. This major amendment will add an additional 92 seats withinthe outdoor plaza area.

3. The use is subject to the provisions of LVMC Chapter 6.40 relating to gaming and LVMCChapter 6.50 relating to liquor control.

The existing Urban Lounge is operating within the provisions LVMC Chapter 6.40 relating to gaming and LVMC Chapter 6.50 relating to liquor control.

In addition, the applicant has also requested a Special Use Permit (SUP-59483) to convert theexisting 23,114 square-foot building into a Mixed-Use development in order to allow aresidential (apartment) use on the second floor of the building, in conjunction with the existingcommercial land uses at the subject site.

A Mixed-Use development is defined by Title 19 as “The vertical integration of residential usesand commercial or civic uses within a single building or a single development, where the usesshare pedestrian access, vehicular access, parking functions, or any combination thereof.”




JB



Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements

1. Residential uses permitted as of right in the R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts may be permitted by

means of a Special Use Permit within a P-O or O Zoning District.

Not applicable, the subject property is located within a C-2 (General Commercial) zoningdistrict.

2. Nonresidential uses permitted as of right in the P-O, O and C-1 Zoning District may be permitted by means of a Special Use Permit within an R-3 or R-4 Zoning District.

Not applicable, the subject property is located within a C-2 (General Commercial) zoningdistrict.

3. Commercial uses or civic uses shall at a minimum be located at the ground level fronting the primary public rights-of-way and may extend beyond the ground floor. The principal entryway toaccess those uses, whether individually or collectively, shall be directly accessed from andoriented to the public sidewalk.

The subject site has commercial uses located on the 1 st

and 2nd

floors which are all accessed from entryways which are oriented towards the public sidewalk.

4. Residential uses shall not be permitted on the ground floor fronting on primary public rights-of-way, but may be located at or above the second level of the building. Residential uses may belocated on the ground floor of any building or portion thereof that is located at the interior of the

development site and does not front on an arterial or collector street.

Not applicable, the residential unit within this building is located on the second floor.

5. Surface parking lots shall be located to the side or the rear of the principal building(s) on thesite, and shall be screened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the principal building(s) ora landscape buffer in conformance with the requirements of LVMC Chapter 19.08. Parkingstructures shall not be located along the street frontages of the development site, but shall bescreened from view of the adjacent rights-of-way by the principal building(s).

The existing surface parking lot is located on the side of the existing building and is screened by

an existing rod iron fence.

The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) provided comments indicating the proposedopen air plaza development is in violation of the existing utility easement, which runs underneaththe existing parcel line in-between the existing building and the proposed open air plaza area.This easement currently contains public water mains, valves, vaults and multiple servicesrequired by the LVVWD. The LVVWD has provided comments indicating that the applicantmay relocate the main and associated appurtenances and request LVVWD relinquish the




JB



easement in order to proceed with this development plan. The applicant has indicated in thesubmitted justification letter that the existing patio cover and concrete platform located on the

subject site will be modified and/or removed, to better facilitate access to the existing facilities.Staff has added a condition of approval requiring the applicant to comply with all LVWWDrequirements.

Staff has determined that the proposed Mixed Use development and expansion of the existingUrban Lounge meets all Title 19 requirements, with the exception of the requested Waiver of theDowntown Centennial Plan Streetscape requirements and can be conducted in a manner that isharmonious and compatible with the neighborhood and adjacent commercial uses. In addition,this proposal complies with the goals of the 18b Arts District listed in the Downtown CentennialPlan; which encourage the enhancement of existing businesses, while encouraging new pedestrian oriented commercial development; therefore, the Department of Planning

recommends approval these applications with conditions.






The proposed expansion of the Urban Lounge use into the open air plaza area iscompatible within the subject site and with other uses located in the 18b Arts District.


The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed UrbanLounge use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate in

size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Site access is provided from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial, andBoulder Avenue, an 80-foot Secondary Collector as designated in the Master Plan ofStreets and Highways. These streets provide adequate access to and from the subject property.



General Plan.




JB



The Urban Lounge will be subject to regular inspection for licensing purposes and willnot compromise the public health, safety and welfare.


The proposed lounge meets all applicable requirements for an Urban Lounge and istherefore in compliance with all conditions of Title 19.04.






The proposed Mixed Use development is compatible within the subject building andwith other uses on surrounding properties.


The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed Urban

Lounge use.



Site access is provided from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial, andBoulder Avenue, an 80-foot Secondary Collector as designated in the Master Plan ofStreets and Highways. These streets provide adequate access to and from the subject property.


or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of theGeneral Plan.

The Mixed Use development will be subject to regular inspection for licensing purposesand will not compromise the public health, safety and welfare.





JB



The proposed Mixed Use Development meets all applicable requirements and istherefore in compliance with all conditions of Title 19.12.





The proposed open-air pedestrian plaza development is located in the Downtown

Centennial Plan – 18b Arts District overlay and will serve as a commercial use that iscomplimentary to the other restaurants and general retail uses in the neighborhood andis the type of use that is encouraged in the Downtown Overlay District.




This project is consistent with the General Plan and the uses allowed in the DowntownCentennial Plan Overlay District. However, it is not consistent with the streetscapedesign encouraged in the Downtown Centennial Plan, which requires a five-foot

amenity zone and a ten-foot wide sidewalk.



Site access is provided from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial andBoulder Avenue, a 80-foot Major Collector Street as designated in the Master Plan ofStreets and Highways. These streets are sufficient in size to accommodate the needs of the proposed use. The parking standards of Title 19 are not automatically applied for proposalswithin the Downtown Centennial Plan; however, the applicant anticipates utilizing nearby public parking-lots and on-street parking meters to satisfy the developments parking

demand. There is an existing parking lot on the western perimeter of the subject site, which provides 16 parking spaces on-site.


The proposed open air pedestrian plaza is developed with a 1,010 square-foot patio shadestructure on the interior of the plaza area and is approximately 10 feet in height. Inaddition, potted plants which range from 15-20 feet in height have been provided along the




JB

Staff Report Page Twelve


perimeter of the plaza, and provide a sufficient buffer from the adjacent rights-of-way.The primary tree species utilized are 24-inch box African Sumac and 24-inch box

Mesquite trees.





No new structures are proposed for the subject site. The submitted site plan indicates theonly structure which will remain on the subject site is a 1,010 square-foot portion of the10-foot tall patio shade structure. In addition, the applicant has provided sufficient interiorlandscaping along the perimeter of the subject site, which provides a sufficient buffer from

the adjacent rights-of-way. Staff has determined that this development is consistent withother commercial development in the Downtown Centennial Plan – 18b Arts Districtoverlay.


general welfare.

The proposed development is subject to permit review and inspection; therefore,appropriate measures will be taken to protect the health, safety and general welfare.Staff has added a condition of approval requiring all non-permitted structures to complywith the all building code to ensure the long term safety of occupants of this patio area.


NOTICES MAILED 454 - SUP-59482 and SUP-59483454 - SDR-59480

APPROVALS 3 - SUP-59482 and SUP-594832 - SDR-59480

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ″ฎ

SUP-59482



Application Number: PRJ-58638

Application/Petition For: Bistro Patio Expansion (SUP/SUP/SDR)

ProjectAddress (Location): 107 EAST CHARLESTON BOULEVARD, SUITE #155

Project Name BISTRO PATIO EXPANSION (SUP/SUP/SDR)

Assessors Parcel #(s): 13933811017, 13934410046

Ward #: WARD 1 (LOIS TARKANIAN), WARD 3 (BOB COFFIN), WARD 5 (RICKI Y. BARLOW)

s the Application InformationCorrect:

Yes

f no, ...change what

General Plan Designation: Proposed: Select

Zoning District: Proposed: Select

Gross Acres: .73

Lots/Units:

Additional Information: Expand use permit for alcohol to outdoor patio, with outdoor entrance.

Applicant First Name: Arts Factory LLC

Applicant Last Name: c/o Wesley Isbutt

Applicant Address: 123 E Charleston

Applicant City: Las Vegas

Applicant State: NV

Applicant Zip: 89101

Applicant Phone: (702) 493-8757

Applicant Fax:

Applicant Email: [email protected]

Rep First Name: Lora

Rep Last Name: Dreja

Rep Address: 820 Sunrise Peak Lane 102

Rep City: Las Vegas

Rep State: NV

Rep Zip: 89144

Rep Phone: (702) 218-7377

Rep Fax:

Rep Email: [email protected]

Page 1 o6/3/2015 11:40:18 AM

CLV Planning - Application Form

SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480



certify that I am the applicant andhat the information submitted withhis application is true and accurateo the best of my knowledge and

belief. I understand that the City isnot responsible for inaccuracies innformation presented, and thatnaccuracies, false information or

ncomplete application may causehe application to be rejected. Iurther certify that I am the owner

or purchaser (or option holder) ofhe property involved in this

application, or the lessee or agentully authorized by the owner to

make this submission. Accept:

Yes

s the Owner Information Correct: Yes

f no, ...change what

Owner(s) ADDR1 ADDR2ARTS FACTORY L L C 101 E CHARLESTON BLVD LAS VEGAS, NV 89104-1018

CLVEPLAN Applicant Company Title Email

Rene Carlsen City of Las Vegas Sr Technical Systems Analyst [email protected]

Westley Isbutt arts factory owner [email protected]

Page 2 o6/3/2015 11:40:18 AM

CLV Planning - Application Form

SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480



ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

ㄦｘ ƥ ｘ फ

ㅡ ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

⇡ ਙ к ₡

ผ Ŵ

Ŵ ผ

ʉ Ŵ

Ŵ

㌱ γ Ŵ ผ к

ਙ

⇡ ਙ к

Ŵ ผ ₡

ऑ ผ ਙ ऑ

ผ к ħ

ऑ ผ ਙ ऑ ผ к ħ

ऑ ผ ਙ ऑ

ผ к ħ

ऑ ผ ਙ

ऑ

ผ к ħ

ऑ ผ ਙ ऑ ผ

к ħ ਙ

⑾ ऑ ผ ਙ ऑ ਙ

₡ こ

ผ

ผ

ऑ Ŵ ผ ㌱

к

ɱ ฎ

ｘ ՙ

﹝

ㄦ ฎ ㈠ ธ ƥ﹝

﹝

ㅡ ㄦ㈠ ธ ธ ƥ﹝

﹝

ㅡ ｘ ƥ﹝

ㅡ ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

″ ｘ ƥ

ｘ फ ㅡ

ㄦ ƥ ｘ

फ

ฎ ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

ЌḶŐ╗Ġ

γ Ŵ ㌱

γ ₡ ਙ

γ Ŵ

₡ ㌱

Ŵ ਙ ऑ ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡

ો ฎ ƥ A

ՙ ƥ फ

ㄦ ƥ

ㅡ फ

ธ ՙ ƥ

ㅡ फ

γ

ש

ħש к

γ

ש

ਙ ㈠

₡ ผ Ŵ ʉ ゜㌱ γ

㌱

₡

⇡

㈾ ਙ ⇡

ਙ ㈠

₡ Ŵ

ਙ ʉ ผ

ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱゜ Ŵ ₡ ₡ ผ

ש

к ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ ɱ ฎ ㈠ ՙ ธ

⑾ Ŵ ゥ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ ɱ ฎ ㈠ ՙ ธ ㅡ

こ Ŵ ħ к ㌀㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ㌱ ਙ こ

ｘ ՙ ǲ ㈠ γ Ŵ ผ к ਙ Ɔ ħש ㄦｘ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ Ќ Ћ

ฎ ɱ

ｘ ㅡ

ผ ㈠ ₡ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ ħ ਙ

Ŵ ₡

ਙ

γ

ผ ผ ħف

γ ⓒ ħ ㌱ к ₡ ħ

㌱ ਙ ऑ ผ ħف

γ ㈠

㌱ ਙ ऑ ผ ħف γ ธ ｘㄦ ⓒ ㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ⓒ кש ₡ ㈠

ผ ਙ ⑾ γ Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱ ƥ ₡ ਙ ㌱こ

ゥ㌱

ऑ ⇡ こ Ŵ к Ŵ

ผ

こ

ħ ʉ ผ ħש ħ ㈠

╗ γ

ਙ ʉ

ผ γ Ŵ к к ਙ

ผ ਙ ผ ऑ

ผ こ ħש γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱こ

ऑ ผ ऑ Ŵ ผ ₡ ⇡ γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱

Ŵ ผ ħ ผ こ

ਙ ⑾ ผٹ ħ ㌱

⑾ ਙ ผ ਙ к к

ʉ ħש γ ผ ऑ

㌱

ਙ γ ħ ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱㈠ ╗ γ Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱

γ Ŵ к к ผ ש

Ŵ ħ Ŵ к к ㌱ ਙ ここ ਙ к Ŵ ʉ ⓒ Ŵ ਙ ผ

Ḷ ㌱ Ŵ к

㌱ ਙ кש Ŵ

″ ゜ ՙ ゜ ธ ｘㄦㄦ ՙ ″ О Ҝ ⇓ Ⓢ ผ ⇓ Ŵ ผ к ਙ ⇓ Ｃ ผ ਙ ऑ ⇡ ਙ ゥ ⇓ ｘ İ A Û A Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ О Ŵ ħ ਙ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ Ҝ Ŵ ऑ ⇓ Ｃ ผ Ŵ ʉ ħ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ ㈠ ผ

╗ γ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ

ｘ ՙ ǲ γ Ŵ ผ к ਙ Ա кٹ

₡ ㈠

ｘ ㅡ ゜ｘ゜ ธ ｘ

ㄦ

ㄦｘ

ㅡ

Ɔ ħש О к Ŵ

A γ ਙ ผ ゜ γ

㌱ ผ

Ɔ О

ｘｘ

फ ए ธ ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

ħש ऑ к Ŵ ｘ

ƥ

ں

ｘ ƥ

ธ ｘ ƥ

ㅡ ｘ ƥ

О Ŵ ผ

ħ Ɔ

㌱ γ ₡

к Ҝ ħ ゥ ₡ Ⓢ

Û

₡ Ŵ

Ҝ ħ ₡ ՙ Ŵ こ

ՙ Ŵ こ

″ ऑ こ

″ ऑ こ

Ҝ ħ ₡

Ő

ħ ₡

ħ Ŵ к ธ

ں

ธ

Ő

Ŵ ผ Ŵ

ㅡ ฎ

″ ฎ

ɱ ″

Ő

Ŵ ħ к

ｘ

ฎ ｘ

″ ㅡ

╗ ਙ Ŵ

к

ㄦｘ

ں

ㅡ ɱ

ں

″ ธ

Û

₡

Ҝ ħ ₡ ՙ Ŵ こ

ՙ Ŵ こ

″ ऑ こ

″ ऑ こ

Ҝ ħ ₡

Ő

ħ ₡

ħ Ŵ к ธ

ں

ธ

Ő

Ŵ ผ Ŵ

ㅡ ㅡ

″ ՙ

ɱ ″

Ő

Ŵ ħ к

ｘ

ฎ ｘ

ㅡ ฎ

╗ ਙ Ŵ

к

ㅡ ″

ں

ㅡ ฎ

ں

ㅡ ″

こ

⇡ ผ ਙ

⑾ ऑ Ŵ ผ

ħ

ऑ Ŵ ㌱

₡ ऑ ผ ਙ

ħ ₡ ₡

ਙ

ħ

Ќ ਙ ऑ Ŵ ㌱ ผ

׀

ħ ผ ₡ ऑ ผ

Ｃ ਙ ʉ ਙ ʉ

ħ Ŵ к О к Ŵ

ऑ Ŵ

ผ ㌱

к

ɱ ㅡ ㅡ ｘｘ ㅡ ″

О ผ ਙ ऑ ਙ

₡ こ

ผف

ผ ਙ

⑾

О Ŵ ผ ㌱

к ں

ɱ ฎ

ں

ｘ ՙ ⓒ

ں

ɱ ㅡ ㅡ ｘ

ｘ ㅡ ″

A ผ Ŵ ｘ㈠ ՙ

Ŵ ㌱ ผ

Ύ ਙ

ธ

Ḷ

ผ к Ŵ

A ผ

Ｃ ħ ผ ħ ㌱

О Ŵ

ħ ਙ ǲ ゥ ऑ Ŵ

ħ ਙ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

ӧ Ŵ

ħ ₡ ỏ ㅡ ⓒ ㅡ ฎ ㄦ

Ɔ

Ћ Ŵ ㌱ Ŵ

Ձ

ਙ ӧ

ธ ỏ

О Ŵ ผ

ħ

Ձ ਙ

ӧ ธ

ỏ

A ผ

ħ ⑾ ħ ㌱

ӧ ธ

ỏ

Ḷ ⑾ ⑾ ħ ㌱

Ա

ħ к ₡ ħ

ӧ

ธ ỏ

ธ ｘ ɱ ㈠ ƥ

ｘ ″ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ″ ฎ

S U P - 5 9 8 4 2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8 3 a n

d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0 - R

E V I S E D



Ｃ Ќ

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

ऑ Ŵ

ħ ਙ

ऑ ਙ ผ Ŵ

⇡ к ⇡ Ŵ ผ

こ Ŵ ㌱

こ

ħ

ผ

こ Ŵ ㌱

こ Ŵ ㌱

こ Ŵ ㌱

こ

ħ ผ

こ

ħ

ผ

こ

ħ

ผ

こ Ŵ ㌱

㌱

к ऑ ผ

㌱

к ऑ ผ

㌱ к ऑ ผ

ผ Ŵ ħ к ħ

㌀

ｘ फ Ŵ

⑾ ⑾ ऑ

ผ Ŵ

ħ к ħ

ผ Ŵ ħ к ħ

к ħ ਙ

⑾ ㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ

ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡ ો ฎ ƥ ｘ

A

Ŵ ผ

γ ऑ

к Ŵ

ผ

Ŵ ผ

γ ऑ

к Ŵ

ผ

Ŵ ผ

γ ऑ

к Ŵ

ผ

Ŵ ผ

γ ऑ

к Ŵ

ผ

Ŵ ผ

γ ऑ

к Ŵ

ผ

Ա Ա Ợ

ں

ƥ ฎ फ

ں

ƥ ฎ फ

к ħ ਙ

⑾ ㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ

ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡ ો ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

A

ں

ɱ ㅡ ㅡ ｘｘ ㅡ ″

γ ħف γ ਙ

⑾ ⑾ ㌱

ો ㄦㄦ फ

ں

ɱ

ฎں

ｘ ՙ

к ħ ਙ

⑾ ㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ

ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡ ો ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

A

ธ ƥ फ

ฎ ƥ

ธ फ

ƥ ″ फ

ธ ｘ ƥ फ

ธ ՙ ƥ

ɱ फ

″ ƥ

″ फ

ฎ ƥ

फ

ƥ ｘ फ

ｘ ƥ

ｘ फ

″ ƥ ՙ फ

ธ ″ ƥ

ɱ फ

ｘ ƥ ՙ फ

ɱ ƥ ″ फ

к ħ ਙ

⑾ ㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡

ો ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

A

к ħ ਙ

⑾ ㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡ ો

ں

ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

A

γ Ŵ ㌱

γ ₡ ਙ

γ Ŵ

₡

㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ ਙ

ผ γ Ŵ

₡

γ

ש

ħש к

γ

ש

ਙ

㈠

₡ ผ Ŵ ʉ ゜㌱ γ

㌱

₡ ⇡

㈾ ਙ ⇡

ਙ

㈠

₡ Ŵ

ਙ ʉ ผ

ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱゜ Ŵ ₡ ₡ ผ

ש

к ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠

ՙ ธ

⑾ Ŵ ゥ㈠

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠

ՙ ธ ㅡ

こ Ŵ ħ к ㌀㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ㌱ ਙ こ

ｘ ՙ ǲ

㈠ γ Ŵ ผ к ਙ

Ɔ

ħש

ㄦｘ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ Ќ Ћ

ฎ ɱ

ｘ ㅡ

ผ ㈠ ₡ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ ħ ਙ

Ŵ ₡

ਙ

γ

ผ ผ ħف γ

ⓒ ħ ㌱ к ₡ ħ

㌱ ਙ ऑ ผ ħف γ

㈠

㌱ ਙ ऑ ผ ħف γ ธ ｘㄦ ⓒ

㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ⓒ

кש ₡ ㈠

ผ ਙ ⑾ γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱ ƥ ₡ ਙ ㌱こ

ゥ㌱

ऑ ⇡ こ Ŵ

к Ŵ

ผ こ


╗ γ

ਙ ʉ

ผ γ Ŵ

к к ਙ ผ

ਙ ผ ऑ

ผ こ ħש γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱こ

ऑ ผ ऑ Ŵ ผ

₡ ⇡

γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱

γ ħש ㌱

Ŵ ผ

ħ ผ こ

ਙ

⑾ ผٹ

ħ ㌱

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ к к

ʉ ħש γ ผ ऑ

㌱

ਙ γ ħ ऑ ผ ਙ

㈾㌱㈠

╗ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱

γ Ŵ

к к ผ

ש

Ŵ ħ Ŵ

к к ㌱ ਙ ここ ਙ

к Ŵ ʉ ⓒ

Ŵ ਙ ผ

Ḷ ㌱ Ŵ

к

㌱ ਙ

кש Ŵ

″ ゜ ՙ ゜ ธ ｘㄦㄦ ՙ ㅡ О Ҝ ⇓ Ⓢ ผ ⇓ Ŵ ผ к ਙ ⇓ Ｃ ผ ਙ ऑ ⇡ ਙ ゥ ⇓ ｘ İ A Û A Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ О Ŵ ħ ਙ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ Ҝ Ŵ ऑ ⇓ Ｃ ผ Ŵ ʉ ħ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ ㈠ ผ



₡ ㈠


ㄦ

ㄦｘ

ㅡ

Ձ Ŵ

₡ ㌱ Ŵ ऑ

О к Ŵ

A

γ ਙ ผ

゜ γ

㌱ ผ

Ձ О

ｘｘ

゜ ฎ फ ए

ƥ

ｘ फ

Ձ Ŵ

₡ ㌱ Ŵ ऑ

О к Ŵ

ｘ ƥ

ㅡ ƥ

ฎ ƥ

ں

″ ƥ

Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġ

╗ ਙ Ŵ

к Ŵ ผ

⑾ ਙ

ਙ Ŵ

ਙ ⑾

γ Ŵ

₡

㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ

ħ Ŵ ऑ ऑ ผ ਙ

ゥ ħ こ Ŵ

к

ⓒ ｘｘ

⑾ ㈠

ｘ ″ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ㄦ


S U P - 5 9 8 4

2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8 3 a n d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0 - R E V I S E D



Ｃ Ќ

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

ऑ Ŵ ħ ਙ

ƥ ฎ

फ

ƥ ฎ

फ

ɱ

ㅡ

ㅡ

ｘ

ｘ ㅡ ″

ɱ

ฎ

ｘ

ՙ

γ Ŵ ㌱ γ ₡

ਙ

γ Ŵ ₡

㌱ Ŵ ਙ ऑ ਙ

ผ γ

Ŵ ₡

⇡ Ŵ ผ

Ŵ ħ

γ ħف γ

ਙ ऑ

Ŵ ħ

⇡ Ŵ ผ

Ŵ ħ

₡ ħ ħ

Ŵ ħ

₡ ħ ħ

Ŵ ħ

₡ ħ ħ

Ŵ ħ

⇡ Ŵ ผ

Ŵ ħ

к ਙ

Ŵ ħ

к ਙ

Ŵ ħ

к ਙ

Ŵ ħ

γ

ħ к

γ

ਙ ㈠

₡ ผ Ŵ ʉ ゜㌱ γ

㌱

₡ ⇡

㈾ ਙ ⇡

ਙ ㈠

₡ Ŵ

ਙ ʉ ผ

ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱゜ Ŵ ₡ ₡ ผ к ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠ں

ՙ ธ

⑾ Ŵ ゥ㈠

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠ں

ՙ ธ ㅡ

こ Ŵ ħ к ㌀㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ㌱ ਙ こ

ں

ｘ ՙ ǲ


Ɔ

ħ

ㄦｘ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ Ќ Ћ

ฎ ɱ

ｘ ㅡ

ผ ㈠ ₡ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ ħ ਙ

Ŵ ₡

ਙ

γ

ผ ผ ħف γ ⓒ

ħ ㌱ к ₡ ħ

㌱ ਙ ऑ ผ ħف γ ㈠



к ₡ ㈠

ผ ਙ ⑾ γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱ ƥ ₡ ਙ ㌱こ

ゥ㌱

ऑ ⇡ こ Ŵ

к Ŵ

ผ こ

ħ ʉ ผ ħ ħ ㈠

╗ γ

ਙ ʉ

ผ γ Ŵ

к к ਙ ผ

ਙ ผ ऑ

ผ こ ħ γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱こ

ऑ ผ ऑ Ŵ ผ

₡ ⇡

γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱

γ ħ ㌱

Ŵ ผ

ħ ผ こ

ਙ

⑾ ผٹ

ħ ㌱

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ к к

ʉ ħ γ ผ ऑ

㌱


㈾㌱㈠

╗ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱

γ Ŵ

к к ผ Ŵ

ħ Ŵ


к Ŵ ʉ ⓒ

Ŵ ਙ ผ

Ḷ ㌱ Ŵ

к

㌱ ਙ

к Ŵ

″ ゜ ՙ ゜ ธ ｘㄦㄦ ՙ ″ О Ҝ ⇓ Ⓢ ผ ⇓ Ŵ ผ к ਙ ⇓ Ｃ ผ ਙ ऑ ⇡ ਙ ゥ ⇓ ｘ İ A Û A Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ О Ŵ ħ ਙ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ Ҝ Ŵ ऑ ⇓ Ｃ ผ Ŵ ʉ ħ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ ㈠ ผ


ں

ｘ ՙ ǲ γ Ŵ ผ к

ਙ Ա кٹ

₡ ㈠


ㄦ

ں

ㄦｘ

ㅡ

Ɔ

Ŵ ħ

О к Ŵ

A

γ ਙ ผ

゜ γ

㌱ ผ

Ձ О

ｘｘ ธ

ｘ

ƥ

ㅡ ƥ

ฎ ƥ

″ ƥ

Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġ

゜ ฎ फ ए

ƥ

ｘ फ

Ɔ

Ŵ ħ

О к Ŵ

ｘ ″ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ㄦ


S U P - 5 9 8

4 2 S U P - 5 9 4 8 3

a n d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0

- R E V I S E D



ｘㄦ゜ ธ ՙ ゜ㄦ




γ

ħ к

γ

ਙ ㈠

₡ ผ Ŵ ʉ ゜㌱ γ

㌱

₡ ⇡

㈾ ਙ ⇡

ਙ ㈠

₡ Ŵ

ਙ ʉ ผ

ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱゜ Ŵ ₡ ₡ ผ к ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠ں

ՙ ธ

⑾ Ŵ ゥ㈠

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠ں

ՙ ธ ㅡ

こ Ŵ ħ к ㌀㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ㌱ ਙ こ

ں

ｘ ՙ ǲ


Ɔ

ħ

ㄦｘ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ Ќ Ћ

ฎ ɱ

ｘ ㅡ

ผ ㈠ ₡ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ ħ ਙ

Ŵ ₡

ਙ γ

ผ ผ ħف γ ⓒ

ħ ㌱ к ₡ ħ

㌱ ਙ ऑ ผ ħف γ ㈠



к ₡ ㈠

ผ ਙ ⑾ γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱ ƥ ₡ ਙ ㌱こ

ゥ㌱

ऑ ⇡ こ Ŵ

к Ŵ

ผ こ

ħ ʉ ผ ħ ħ ㈠

╗ γ

ਙ ʉ

ผ γ Ŵ

к к ਙ ผ

ਙ ผ ऑ

ผ こ ħ γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱こ

ऑ ผ ऑ Ŵ ผ

₡ ⇡

γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱

γ ħ ㌱

Ŵ ผ

ħ ผ こ

ਙ

⑾ ผٹ

ħ ㌱

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ к к

ʉ ħ γ ผ ऑ

㌱


㈾㌱㈠

╗ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱

γ Ŵ

к к ผ Ŵ

ħ Ŵ


к Ŵ ʉ ⓒ

Ŵ ਙ ผ

Ḷ ㌱ Ŵ

к

㌱ ਙ

к Ŵ

ㄦ゜ ธ ゜ ธ ｘㄦㄦｘ ՙ ㄦ О Ҝ ⇓ Ⓢ ผ ⇓ Ŵ ผ к ਙ ⇓ Ｃ ผ ਙ ऑ ⇡ ਙ ゥ ⇓ ｘ İ A Û A Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ О Ŵ ħ ਙ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ Ҝ Ŵ ऑ ⇓ Ｃ ผ Ŵ ʉ ħ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ ㈠ ผ


ں

ｘ ՙ ǲ γ Ŵ ผ к

ਙ Ա кٹ

₡ ㈠


ㄦ

ں

ㄦｘ

ㅡ

ǲ к

ٹ

Ŵ ħ ਙ

A

γ ਙ ผ

゜ γ

㌱ ผ

ǲ Ћ

ｘｘ

ਙ ผ

γ

ħ ₡

ਙ

γ

ħ ₡

ธ ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

γ ħ γ ਙ ⑾ ⇡ ħ к ₡ ħ

ʉ

ħ ₡

Ŵ

ħ ₡

ऑ Ŵ

ħ ਙ

ऑ Ŵ

ħ ਙ

ผ Ŵ ħ к ħ

ો ㄦㄦ फ Ŵ

⑾ ⑾

к ਙ ʉ

ผ Ŵ ʉ

ħ

ો ฎ ƥ ｘ फ Ŵ

⑾ ⑾

ऑ ऑ ผ

Ŵ ʉ

ħ

ો

ｘ ƥ ｘ फ Ŵ

⑾ ⑾



S U P - 5 9 4 8 2

S U P - 5 9 4 8 3 a n d

S D R - 5 9 4 8 0



Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ｃ Ќ

Ｃ Ќ

Ⓢ О

Ｃ Ќ

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

⇡ Ŵ ผ

ผ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

ħ ㌱

γ

ผ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

ਙ ผ Ŵ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡

ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

ਙ ผ Ŵ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

ਙ ผ Ŵ

こ

ƥ

ʉ ਙ こ

ƥ

ผ ㈠ ผ ㈠

ผ ㈠ ผ ㈠

ف

Ŵ к к ผ

ɱ ՙ ƥ फ

ธ ՙ ƥ ՙ फ

ɱ ƥ ฎ

फ

ऑ Ŵ

ħ ਙ

γ

ש

ħש к

γ

ש

ਙ

㈠

₡ ผ Ŵ ʉ ゜㌱ γ

㌱

₡ ⇡

㈾ ਙ ⇡

ਙ

㈠

₡ Ŵ

ਙ ʉ ผ

ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱゜ Ŵ ₡ ₡ ผ

ש

к ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ ɱ ฎ ㈠ ՙ ธ

⑾ Ŵ ゥ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ ɱ ฎ ㈠ ՙ ธ

ㅡ

こ Ŵ ħ к ㌀㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ㌱ ਙ こ

ｘ ՙ ǲ


Ɔ

ħש

ㄦｘ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ Ќ Ћ

ฎ ɱ

ｘ ㅡ

ผ ㈠ ₡ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ ħ ਙ

Ŵ ₡

ਙ

γ

ผ ผ ħف γ

ⓒ ħ ㌱ к ₡ ħ


㈠


ธ ｘ

ㄦ ⓒ


кש ₡ ㈠

ผ ਙ ⑾ γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱

ƥ ₡ ਙ ㌱こ

ゥ㌱

ऑ ⇡ こ Ŵ

к Ŵ

ผ こ


╗ γ

ਙ ʉ

ผ γ Ŵ

к к ਙ ผ

ਙ ผ ऑ

ผ こ ħש γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱こ

ऑ ผ ऑ Ŵ ผ

₡ ⇡

γ

Ŵ ผ ㌱

γ ħש ㌱

Ŵ ผ

ħ ผ こ

ਙ

⑾ ผٹ

ħ ㌱

⑾ ਙ ผ

ਙ к к

ʉ ħש γ ผ ऑ

㌱


㈾㌱㈠

╗ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħש ㌱

γ Ŵ

к к ผ

ש

Ŵ ħ Ŵ


к Ŵ ʉ ⓒ

Ŵ ਙ ผ

Ḷ ㌱ Ŵ

к

㌱ ਙ

кש Ŵ

″ ゜ ՙ ゜ ธ ｘㄦㄦ ՙ О Ҝ ⇓ Ⓢ ผ ⇓ Ŵ ผ к ਙ ⇓ Ｃ ผ ਙ ऑ ⇡ ਙ ゥ ⇓ ｘ İ A Û A Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ О Ŵ ħ ਙ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ Ҝ Ŵ ऑ ⇓ Ｃ ผ Ŵ ʉ ħ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ ㈠ ผ



₡ ㈠

ｘ ㅡ ゜ｘ

゜ ธ

ｘ

ㄦ

ㄦｘ

ㅡ

к ਙ ਙ ผ

О к Ŵ

A

γ ਙ ผ

゜ γ

㌱ ผ

О

ｘｘ

ｘ

ƥ

ㅡ ƥ

ฎ ƥ

ں

″ ƥ

゜ ฎ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

ħ ผ

к ਙ ਙ ผ

Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġ

ｘ ″ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ㄦ


S U P - 5 9 8

4 2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8 3

a n d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0

- R E V I S E D



Ｃ Ќ

Ｃ Ќ

Ｃ Ќ

Ⓢ О

Ⓢ О

Ｃ Ќ

Ｃ Ќ

ผ

ħ ₡

㌱

ਙ ผ Ŵف

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

₡ ħ ਙ

ਙ ผ Ŵف

ਙ ผ Ŵف

ɱ ƥ

ฎ फ

ธ ՙ ƥ ՙ फ

γ

ש

ħ к

γ

ש

ਙ

㈠

₡ ผ Ŵ ʉ ゜㌱ γ

㌱

₡ ⇡

㈾ ਙ ⇡ ਙ

㈠

₡ Ŵ

ਙ ʉ ผ

ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱゜ Ŵ ₡ ₡ ผ

ש

к ㈠ ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠

ՙ ธ

⑾ Ŵ ゥ㈠

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ㄦ

ɱ ฎ ㈠

ՙ ธ ㅡ

こ Ŵ ħ к ㌀㈾ Ŵ ʉ Ŵ ₡ ħ ਙ ㌱ ਙ こ

ｘ ՙ ǲ

㈠ γ Ŵ ผ к ਙ Ɔ ħ

ㄦｘ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ

ف

Ŵ Ќ Ћ

ฎ ɱ

ｘ ㅡ

ผ ㈠ ₡ Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ ħ ਙ

Ŵ ₡

ਙ

γ

ผ ผ ħف γ

ⓒ ħ ㌱ к ₡ ħ


㈠



к ₡ ㈠

ผ ਙ ⑾ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱ ƥ ₡ ਙ ㌱こ

ゥ㌱

ऑ ⇡ こ Ŵ к Ŵ

ผ

こ

ħ ʉ ผ ħ ħ

㈠

╗ γ ਙ

ʉ

ผ γ Ŵ к к ਙ ผ ਙ

ผ ऑ

ผ こ ħ γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱こ

ऑ ผ ऑ Ŵ ผ ₡ ⇡ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱

Ŵ ผ ħ ผ こ

ਙ ⑾ ผٹ ħ ㌱

⑾ ਙ ผ ਙ

к к

ʉ ħ γ ผ ऑ

㌱

ਙ γ ħ ऑ ผ ਙ ㈾㌱

㈠ ╗ γ Ŵ

ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱

γ Ŵ к к ผ ש

Ŵ ħ Ŵ к к ㌱ ਙ ここ ਙ к Ŵ ʉ

ⓒ Ŵ ਙ ผ

Ḷ ㌱ Ŵ к

㌱ ਙ к Ŵ

ㅡ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ ธ ｘㄦㄦ ธ ㄦ О Ҝ ⇓ Ⓢ ผ ⇓ Ŵ ผ к ਙ ⇓ Ｃ ผ ਙ ऑ ⇡ ਙ ゥ ⇓ ｘ İ A Û A Ɔ ╗ Ⓢ Ｃ ● Ḷ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ О Ŵ ħ ਙ ╗ Ŵ ħٹ Ҝ Ŵ ऑ ⇓ Ｃ ผ Ŵ ʉ ħ ⇓ ㄦｘ ㅡ A ผ Ŵ ㌱ ਙ ผ Ő ธ ㈠ ผ



₡ ㈠

ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ ธ ｘㄦ

ㄦｘ

ㅡ

ธ ₡ к ਙ ਙ ผ О к Ŵ

A γ ਙ ผ ゜ γ

㌱ ผ

О

ｘｘ ธ

゜ ฎ फ

ए

ƥ ｘ फ

ธ

₡ к ਙ ਙ ผ

О к Ŵ

ｘ

ƥ

ㅡ ƥ

ฎ ƥ

ں

″ ƥ



S U P - 5

9 4 8 2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8

3 a n d S D R - 5 9 4 8

0





S U P - 5 9 4 8

2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8 3 a

n d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0





S U P - 5 9

4 8 2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8 3

a n d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎ″ฎ

S U P - 5 9 4 8 2

, S U P - 5 9 4 8 3 a n

d S D R - 5 9 4 8 0





S U P - 5 9 4 8 2 , S U P - 5 9 4 8

3 a n d S D R - 5 9 4 8

0



S U P - 5 9 4 8 2

[ P R J -

5 8 6 3 8 ] -

S P E C I A L

U S

E

P E R M I T

R E L A T E D T

O

S U P - 5 9 4 8 3

A N D S D R - 5 9 4 8 0

-

A P P L I C A N T : W E S I

S B U T T - O W N E R : A R T S

F A C T O R Y , L L C

1 0 7 E A S T C H A R L E

S T O N B O U L E V A R D , S U I T

E # 1 5 5

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



S U P - 5 9 4 8 2

[ P R J -

5 8 6 3 8 ] -

S P E C I A L

U S

E

P E R M I T

R E L A T E D T

O

S U P - 5 9 4 8 3

A N D S D R - 5 9 4 8 0

-






E # 1 5 5

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



İ ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ Ձ ผ

ں ɱں ㄦ

ऑкŴħف ₡ ٹ кਙऑこ

₡ ٹ кਙऑこ ผٹħ㌱㌱ ผ

㌱ħ ਙ⑾ кŴ Ŵف ٹ

ผ ₡ऑผ

Aผ Ŵ㌱ ਙผ ОŴ ħਙ

кŴ ٹŴⓒ ف ٹ

Ŵऑ

ɱ

ฎ

ｘ

ՙ Ŵ₡ ɱ

ㅡ

ㅡ

ｘ

ｘㅡ″

╗γħ ⇡こħ Ŵк ħ ਙ ผ Ŵ ħ׀ ₡ ٹ кਙऑこ ऑкŴ ผ ħ ʉ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ Ŵ₡₡ħ ħਙ ਙ⑾ γٹ ОŴ ħਙ ਙ

γ ゥħ ħف ƆⓈО ⑾ਙผ γ Ⓢผ⇡Ŵ Ձਙف Ձħ㌱ Ќこ⇡ ผ Ձㅡں ｘｘｘｘں

⇡ħк₡ħف Ŵ ₡㈠ ӧٹｘՙ ǲ㈠ γŴผк ਙ Աкں ɱ ฎ ｘ ՙỏ㈠ A₡ γ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ Ŵ ธ ǲ㈠ں

γŴผк ਙ Աкٹ₡㈠ ӧ ɱ

ㅡ

ㅡ

ｘ

ｘㅡ″ ỏ

╗γħ ㌱ ₡ ОŴ ħਙ ผٹ Ŵ Ŵ Aк ผ ㌱ਙ ₡ħħف ゥऑ ผħ ㌱ ⑾ਙผ γ ゥħ ħف ผ ŴผŴ Ŵ₡

ԱŴผⓒ ● Ŵ₡₡ħ ħਙŴк ผٹ Ŵ Ŵ ਙ ₡ਙਙผ ٹ ऑŴ㌱ ⑾ਙผ γ Ŵผħ ₡ ㌱к ผŴкٹ ٹ γŴ γ

Aผ Ŵ㌱ ਙผ γŴ ऑਙਙผ ₡ ⑾ਙผ γ ऑŴ ธｘ Ŵผ㈠ ●㌱к₡ħف Ћħ Ŵف Աħ Ќħفγ ⓒ ħผ

ผħ₡Ŵ Ŵ₡ ОŴħ ผ ਙ γ ОŴ ħਙ㈠

γ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ㌱ਙこऑкħ ʉħ γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ⇡к ऑผਙٹħħਙ ਙ⑾ γ ₡ ٹ кਙऑこ㌱ਙ₡ Ŵ₡ γ

ف ผŴк ऑкŴ⊿ ħ ㌱ਙこऑŴ ħ⇡к ʉħ γ Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱ ħ ผこ ਙ⑾ ㌱Ŵк ⓒ ħ ₡ ħف Ŵ₡ ਙऑ ผŴ ħف

㌱γŴผŴ㌱ ผħ ħ㌱⊿ Ŵ₡ ʉħкк ਙ ㌱Ŵ ⇡ Ŵ ħŴк ₡ħこħ ħਙ ਙ⑾ γ Ŵкٹ ਙ⑾ ਙ γ ผ ऑผਙऑ ผ ħ

ħ γ Ŵผ Ŵ ħ ħ кਙ㌱Ŵ ₡㈠ ऑ⇡кħ㌱ Ŵ⑾ ⓒ ผŴऑਙผ Ŵ ħਙ Ŵ₡ ħкħ ⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ ħ ผٹħ㌱ ʉħкк ⇡

ŴٹŴħкŴ⇡к ਙ γ ⇡㈾㌱ ऑผਙऑ ผ γŴٹħف ਙ ⑾⑾ ㌱ ਙ γ ŴٹŴħкŴ⇡ħкħ ਙ⑾ γ Ŵこ ผٹħ㌱

ਙ ゥħ ħف Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱ ₡ ٹ кਙऑこ㈠

╗γ ゥħ ħف ऑŴ ħਙ ㌱ਙٹ ผ Ŵ₡ ㌱ਙ㌱ผ ऑкŴ ⑾ਙผこ ʉħкк ⇡ こਙ₡ħ⑾ħ ₡ Ŵ₡ ਙผ ผ こਙٹ ₡ⓒ ਙ ⇡ ผ

Ŵккਙʉ Ŵ㌱㌱ ⑾ਙผ ゥħ ħف ħкħ ħ ㈠

ऑк Ŵ ㌱Ŵкк ħ⑾ ਙ γŴٹ Ŵ ħਙ ਙผ ׀ ₡ Ŵ₡₡ħ ħਙŴк ħ⑾ਙผこŴ ħਙ

γŴ ਙⓒ

Û к ●⇡

ՙｘธ ㅡɱ ฎՙㄦՙ

ｘ″゜ธㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ″ฎ

SUP-59482, SUP-59483 and SDR-59480 - REVISED







SUBJECT:SUP-59483 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-59482 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT: WES ISBUTT - OWNER: ARTS FACTORY, LLC - For possible action on arequest for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 23,114 SQUARE-FOOT MIXED-USEDEVELOPMENT at 107 East Charleston Boulevard (APNs 139-33-811-017 and 139-34-410-046), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58638]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup

2. Supporting Documentation





paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ″ฎ

SUP-59483







SUBJECT:SDR-59480 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-59482 AND SUP-59483 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: WES ISBUTT - OWNER: ARTS FACTORY,LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review TO MODIFY THEBUILDING ELEVATIONS AND DEVELOP A PEDESTRIAN PLAZA FOR AN EXISTINGURBAN LOUNGE WITH A WAIVER OF STREETSCAPE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS on0.13 acres at 123 East Charleston Boulevard (APNs 139-33-811-017 and 139-34-410-046), C-2(General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58638]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:



1. Consolidated Backup2. Supporting Documentation3. Support Postcards





paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ″ฎ

SDR-59480







SUBJECT:SUP-59257 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: EGG & I, INC. -OWNER: SAHARA WESTLAKE ASSOCIATES - For possible action on a request for aSpecial Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 3,264 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT WITHSERVICE BAR WITH A 938 SQUARE-FOOT OUTDOOR PATIO at 4533 West SaharaAvenue, Suite #F5 (APN 162-07-101-008), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1(Tarkanian) [PRJ-59118]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps




SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: EGG & I, INC. - OWNER: SAHARA WESTLAKE

ASSOCIATES


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Restaurant withService Bar use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed for

consideration by the City of Las Vegas.



5. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.

6. Minors shall only be permitted in such areas wherein spirituous, malt or fermented liquorsor wines are served only in conjunction with regular meals and where dining tables or booths are provided separate from the bar in conformance with Title 6.50.

7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las VegasMunicipal Code.




SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a proposed Restaurant with Service Bar for anexisting restaurant located within an existing shopping center at 4533 West Sahara Avenue, Suite#F5. The restaurant establishment is 3,264 square feet in size with a 938 square-foot outdoorseating area. The Restaurant with Service Bar use will be ancillary to the existing restaurant,which was licensed on 02/08/89. The proposed use is consistent with the C-1 (LimitedCommercial) designation. As this request can be conducted in a compatible and harmoniousmanner with the existing surrounding land uses, staff recommends approval of this application. If

denied, the applicant will not be allowed to conduct the Restaurant with Service Bar use at thislocation, but the existing restaurant may continue to operate.

ISSUES

The Restaurant with Service Bar use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoningdistrict with the approval of a Special Use Permit.



03/27/86The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance (V-0017-86) to allow a motorcycle dealership which is not permitted and allow outsidedisplay for a maximum of ten motorcycles at 4505 West Sahara Avenue.

07/28/92The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Special Use Permit(U-0138-92) to allow Minor Motorcycle Repair at 4505 West Sahara Avenue.

08/16/00

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-0071-00)for the sale of On-Premise Beer and Wine in conjunction with an existing3,264 square-foot Restaurant (The Egg & I) at 4533 West Sahara Avenue.The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request on 07/13/00.

11/19/08The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-29844)for a proposed Secondhand Dealer at 4503 West Sahara Avenue. ThePlanning Commission recommended approval of the request on 10/23/08.





SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB




02/0889

A business license (#R09-00286) was issued for a restaurant (The Egg & I)

use at 4533 West Sahara Ave, Suite #F5. The license is still active.

04/06/11A Code Enforcement case (#100087) was processed for illegal banner signs(The Egg & I) at 4533 West Sahara Ave, Suite #F5. The case was resolved on04/11/11.

04/03/13A building permit (#232827) was issued for a meter tag (The Egg & I) at4533 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #F5. The permit was finalized on 04/11/13.

04/11/13A building permit (#232763) was issued for vehicle damage repair (The Egg& I) at 4533 West Sahara Avenue, Suite #F5. The permit was finalized on05/28/13.


04/29/15A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over theapplication materials and submittal requirements for a Special Use Permit fora proposed Restaurant with Service bar use.



Field Check

06/04/15The site contains an existing general retail shopping center. During a routinesite inspection staff observed a well maintained commercial site free of trashand debris.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.84

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

North Shopping Center MXU (Mixed Use)C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

SouthSingle-Family

Detached, DwellingL (Low Density


Residential)



SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB



Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


East General Office MXU (Mixed Use)C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

West General Retail MXU (Mixed Use)C-1 (LimitedCommercial)




No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A


Trails N/A





Street Name

Functional

Classification of Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width(Feet)

Compliance

with Street Section

Sahara Avenue Primary ArterialMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways 150 Y


Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-

cappedRegular

Handi-

cappedShoppingCenter

46,241 SF 1/250 185





SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB



ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to establish a Restaurant with Service Bar use for an existingrestaurant located in an existing shopping center development at 4533 West Sahara Avenue,Suite #F5. The subject site is located with the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Theexisting restaurant is 3,264 square feet in size with a 938 square-foot outdoor seating area andhas seating for 170 people. The Restaurant with Service Bar use will be ancillary to the existingrestaurant. The applicant has indicated in the justification letter that the proposed Restaurant withService Bar use will allow the existing restaurant to provide alcoholic beverages in conjunctionwith a meal.

The subject site is located within an existing 46,241 square-foot shopping center development.The existing development provides shares access and parking throughout the subject site. The

proposal adheres to all minimum parking requirements.

A Restaurant with Service Bar use is described in Tile 19.12 as: “A bar wherein alcoholic beverage drinks are prepared for service only at tables in a restaurant and for consumption onlyin connection with a meal served on the premises, and where customers are not permitted to purchase alcoholic beverage drinks directly from the bar or for off- premise consumption.”

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:1. No restaurant service bar shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship,school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children or City park.

The subject site is not located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school, individualcare center licensed for more than 12 children, or City park.

2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to inRequirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between two propertylines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which is closest to the existinguse to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing usewhich is closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight linewithout regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term “property line”

refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and does not include the property line of:a. Any leasehold parcel; or

b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site parking andwhich has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation described in Requirement 1.

Distances have been measured from APN (162-07-101-008).

3. In the case of a restaurant service bar proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80 acres insize, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured in a straight line:



SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB



a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of the structurein which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles; or

b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a shopping centeror other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property line of the existing use to thenearest property line of a leasehold or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without regard to intervening obstacles.

Not applicable, the subject site is not located on a parcel of at least 80 acres of size, the assessorlist the subject property at 0.84 acres.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for a restaurant service bar which alsorequires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning Commission shalltake into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its recommendation to the City

Council, state whether the distance requirement should be waived and the reasons in support ofthe decision.

No distance separation Waivers from any church/house of worship, school, individual carecenter licensed for more than 12 children, or City park associated with this proposal.

5. The minimum distance requirement in Requirement 1 does not apply to an establishmentwhich has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a hotel having 200 or more guestrooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200guest rooms after July 1, 1992.

This condition is not applicable as the subject site is not located within an establishment whichhas a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a resort hotel having 200 or more guestrooms.

* 6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of LVMCChapter 6.50.

The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined in LVMCChapter 6.50 if approved.

According to the submitted justification letter and floor plan, the proposed use meets the

definition outlined above. The proposed Restaurant with Service Bar use adheres to all minimumspecial use permit requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The subject site is not located within400 feet of any church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more thantwelve children, or City Park. In addition, staff has added a condition of approval requiring the business conform to all provisions of LVMC Chapter 6.50 with regards to running a restaurantand alcohol license. It has been determined that the proposed Restaurant with Service Bar usecan be conducted in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding land uses, therefore, staffis recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate for the surrounding area.



SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB








The proposed Restaurant with Service Bar use will be ancillary to the existing restaurantuse at the subject site. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses andcan be conducted in a manner that is harmonious with surrounding land uses.


The subject site is located within an existing shopping center development that is physically suitable for the intensity of the proposed land use.



Access to the site will not change. Vehicles may enter the property from Sahara Avenue a150-foot Primary Arterial, as classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be inconsistent withor compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall objectives of the

General Plan.

Approval of this Special Use Permit will not compromise the public health safety andgeneral welfare of the public. The use will be subject to regular inspections and is subjectto licensing restrictions.


The proposed use meets all applicable conditions of approval for a Restaurant with Service

Bar use per Title 19.12.


NOTICES MAILED 416



SUP-59257 [PRJ-59118]

JB



APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜

ฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎ

SUP-59257



S

U P - 5 9 2 5 7



S U P - 5 9 2 5 7

[ P R J - 5 9 1 1 8 ] -

S P E C I A L U S E

P E R M I T

- A P P L I C A N T : E

G G

&

I , I N C . -

O W N E R : S A H A R A

W E S T L A K E A S S O C

I A T E S

4 5 3 3 W E S T S A H A R A A V E N U E , S U I T E # F 5

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜

ฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ฎSUP-59257







SUBJECT:SUP-59427 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: COVENANT OFLOVE CORPORATION - OWNER: JATIN PANDIT - For possible action on a request for aSpecial Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,443 SQUARE-FOOT CHURCH/HOUSE OFWORSHIP USE at 3016 Vegas Drive (APN 139-20-414-006), R-1 (Single Family Residential)Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59414]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report

3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter6. Support Postcard



SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: COVENANT OF LOVE CORPORATION -

OWNER: JATIN PANDIT


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Church/Houseof Worship use.



4. All parking areas shall be surfaced (paved, striped and marked) to clearly define parkingspaces and handicapped parking spaces in accordance with Title 19.06.040(G)(3) and Title

19.08.110(C)(8).5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submittedfor building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license application.




SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Currently, the 0.17-acre subject site contains a 1,443 square-foot single-family residence. Theapplicant is proposing to convert this space into a Church/House of Worship with ancillaryservices that will include workshops, after-school mentoring, musical choir, weddingceremonies, spiritual dancing and educational programs designed to “ break the cycle ofentitlement and dependency” in the area. The applicant is not proposing any changes to theexterior of the existing building and only minor renovations are planned within the interior toconvert the residence to an assembly space. As the minimum requirements for a special use permit for the church are met and the proposed use can be harmonious and compatible with

surrounding church and residential uses, staff recommends approval with conditions. If denied,the use would remain Single-Family Residential and the church and any of its services could not be operated from this location.

ISSUES

A Special Use Permit is required for a Church/House of Worship use within the R-1 (Single-Family Residential) District.



07/26/56

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Petition to Annex (A-01-56) property generally located south of Holly Avenue, north of Vegas Drive, eastof Ferrell Street and west of Willowbrook Drive. The Planning Commissionand staff recommended approval. The annexation recorded 08/15/56.




c. 1958 The existing 1,443 square-foot single-family residence was constructed.

01/13/04A building permit (#4000763) was issued to reconnect the plumbing pressurerelief line at 3016 Vegas Drive. The permit received a final inspection on01/14/04.

05/07/13A code enforcement citation (#128492) was issued for a garage sale occurringfive days per week. The citation was resolved on 05/16/13.



SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK




03/23/15

Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant to discuss a

proposal to locate a church at 3016 Vegas Drive. Staff worked diligently withthe applicant to revise the submitted site plan and building elevations. Staffdetermined that a Special Use Permit would be required and possibly a SiteDevelopment Plan Review depending on the revised drawings.

05/18/15

Staff conducted a second pre-application meeting with the applicant to reviewthe revised drawings. Additional revisions would be required but staffdetermined that only a Special Use Permit would be required, as the applicantis not proposing any changes to the interior or exterior of the existing building. Staff advised the applicant to speak with the Department of Building& Safety to ascertain the requirements of converting a residential house intoan assembly area.

05/26/15Staff conducted a third pre-application meeting to view the revised drawings.Staff determined that the drawings were adequate for submittal and discussedthe submittal requirements for a Special Use Permit.



Field Check

06/04/15Staff conducted a routine field check and noted an existing single-familyresidence. Staff also noted weeds within the front and side yards, adjacent toVegas Drive and Ferrell Street.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.17

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject PropertySingle-Family

ResidenceL (Low Density


Residential)

NorthSingle-Family

Residence

L (Low Density

Residential)

R-1 (Single Family

Residential)

SouthSingle-Family



Residential)

EastSingle-Family



Residential)

WestChurch/House of

WorshipO (Office) O (Office)



SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK





Special Purpose and Overlay Districts ComplianceA-O (Airport Overlay) District – 70 Feet Y


Trails N/A





Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Vegas Drive Primary ArterialMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways 90 Feet N

Ferrell Street Local StreetMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways 50 Feet Y


Parking Requirement

UseGross

Floor

Area


Parking Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Church/Houseof Worship

100 SF

1:100 SF ofseating area inthe gathering

space

1



ANALYSIS

The Church/House of Worship use is defined as “Any building used for religious worshipservices, religious education and fellowship activities and programs of a religious organization.This use includes the use of the building and premises for other related activities, such as childcare facilities, formal educational programs, preschool classes and recreational activities, but



SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK



only when those activities are ancillary to the religious use and only after those uses have beenapproved by means of a use review or other procedure under LVMC Chapter 19.16. This use

does not include any class of child care center, general education classroom or facility, thriftshop, homeless shelter or commercial activity.”

The proposed use meets the definition, as the existing 1,443 square-foot building would be usedfor worship services, fellowship activities and educational programs.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

1. The Special Use Permit approval may include such activities as religious services,religious instruction, church club activities and similar activities.

The proposed use meets this requirement. According to the applicant’s justification letterdate stamped 05/26/15, religious worship is the primary use of the site.

2. The Special Use Permit approval may also include accessory functions, such as child carefacilities, formal educational programs, preschool classes and similar related activities, if:a. The uses are specifically proposed in the application; and b. The Director finds that each such use is ancillary to the primary use.

The proposed use meets this requirement, as the applicant has specifically requested thateducational programs, workshops, mentoring, musical choir, weddings, and dancing beincluded as accessory functions, which serve as an integral part of the ministry be a part

of the Special Use Permit.

3. Following approval of a Special Use Permit, if any additional uses not specificallycovered by that Special Use Permit are proposed, an additional public hearing processshall be required to add the uses.

This condition does not apply at this time, as the specific uses covered by the Special Use Permit are only now being established through this proposal.

4. (Non-Waivable) In residential districts, related uses such as thriftshops, homeless sheltersand other similar activities may not be conducted and are not eligible for approval as part

of a Special Use Permit. Such uses may be conducted only in the zoning districts inwhich such uses are permitted as primary uses, and must receive specific approval tooperate.

The proposed use meets this requirement, as the applicant is not requesting related uses such as a thriftshop, day care center or homeless shelter, but instead a worship spacewith ancillary programs to edify the congregants.



SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK



5. (Non-Waivable) Churches on sites larger than five acres shall not be permitted in the UDistrict or a district with an “R” prefix.

This requirement does not apply to the proposed use, as it would occur on a site of lessthan five acres (0.17 acres), which is allowed in residential districts.

The 0.17-acre subject site is located at the northeast corner of Vegas Drive and Ferrell Street,along the edge of an existing R-1 (Single-Family Residential) District, between an existingChurch/House of Worship to the west and single-family residences to the north, south and east.The site is thus suited for a house of worship and no rezoning is necessary to establish this use atthe subject location.

The applicant is not proposing any building additions or exterior building renovations. The only

proposed improvements include interior renovations that are a result of a change of use from asingle-family residence to a church/house of worship. The building will retain a design similar toother single family residences in the area. The site is easily accessed from Ferrell Street and fromthe neighborhood it is intended to serve. Parking is adequate and available within the rear yardwith access from Ferrell Street. A condition of approval has been added requiring all parkingareas to be surfaced (paved, striped and marked) to clearly define parking spaces andhandicapped parking spaces. According to the applicant, most of the congregants and visitorswould walk to the facility and therefore not use the available parking. In an effort to improve theexisting site, the applicant is proposing to plant additional landscaping within the front and sideyards. Specifically, nine 24-inch box trees would be planted adjacent to Ferrell Street and VegasDrive.

The Department of Planning routed this request for a Special Use Permit to outside agencies forreview. The Las Vegas Valley Water District responded with the following comment. “ This parcel is currently served by LVVWD but does not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for metersizing, available fire flow, and installation of required backflow prevention.”

As the proposed use meets the minimum requirements for a Special Use Permit, the site issuitable for a house of worship and this use is compatible with the surrounding land uses andzoning districts, staff recommends approval with conditions.








SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK



The proposed Church/House of Worship use would be located on property surrounded byan existing church to the west and single-family residential uses on the three sides. The

building will retain the architectural character of the single-family residential buildings,which surround the site. Most traffic will be by foot; therefore vehicular traffic is notexpected to significantly increase in the neighborhood and the provided parking will beadequate. Therefore, this use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious andcompatible with the existing surrounding land uses.


The existing 1,443 square-foot building will not be expanding on the subject site.Provided onsite parking, along with on-street spaces, will be adequate to accommodatereligious services and proposed ancillary uses of the site.



Ferrell Street is a 50-foot wide right-of-way providing vehicular access, via driveway, tothe rear of the site. The access is adequate to meet the needs of the proposed Church/Houseof Worship use.



General Plan.

Renovations in conjunction with this Special Use Permit request will be subject to building permits and inspections from Fire Services and Building and Safety, thus protecting the public’s health safety and welfare.


The proposed use is consistent with all of the minimum requirements for a Church/Houseof Worship. Any new uses proposed after approval of a Special Use Permit will requireamendment of the Special Use Permit under a separate hearing.


NOTICES MAILED 349



SUP-59427 [PRJ-59414]

GK



APPROVALS 1

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡ ㅡ

SUP-59427



ｘ ″ ゜゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ㅡ ㅡ

S U P - 5 9 4 2

7 - R E V I S E D



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱㅡ ㅡ

S U P - 5

9 4 2 7




S U

P - 5 9 4 2 7




S

U P 5 9 4 2 7




SUP-59427



ｘ ″ ゜

゜

ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ

ㅡ ㅡ

SUP-59427 - REVISED



S U P - 5 9 4 2 7 [ P R J - 5

9 4 1 4 ] - S P E C I A L U S E P

E R M I T - A P P L I C A N T : C O

V E N A N T O F L O V E C O R P

O R A T I O N

-

O W N E R : J A T I N P A N D I T

3 0 1 6 V E G A S D R I V E

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡ ㅡ

SUP-59427







SUBJECT:SUP-59509 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: GRACEFULFACIALS & BODYWORK - OWNER: PINES OFFICE CENTER, LLC - For possible actionon a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit (SUP-54904) TORELOCATE AND EXPAND A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT USE FROM 849 SQUAREFEET TO 2,531 SQUARE FEET at 7311 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #110 (APN 163-03-501-001), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-59117]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:



1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: GRACEFUL FACIALS & BODYWORK -

OWNER: PINES OFFICE CENTER, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a MassageEstablishment use.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permits (SUP-46696 and SUP-54904).








SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to relocate an existing Massage Establishment use within an office complex atthe southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Tenaya Way. This is the second modificationto an existing Massage Establishment Special Use Permit. The previously approved Special UsePermits were SUP-46696 and SUP-54904. This is the third location (7311 West CharlestonBoulevard, Suite #110) within the same office complex and second expansion of the originalland use entitlement. Title 19.16.110(M) states that if the expansion is over 50% of the originalland use entitlement, then a major amendment to a previous approved Special Use Permit isrequired. The proposed expansion is 264 percent of the original entitlement. A distance

separation Waiver from residentially zoned properties was approved by City Council on12/19/12 and no additional Waivers are required. The proposed use meets all other coderequirements and can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the existingand surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of the application; however, if denied theapplicant’s Massage Establishment at 7331 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #120 may remainoperational.

ISSUES

A Massage Establishment use is permitted with an approved Special Use Permit in a C-1

(Limited Commercial) zoning district. The relocation and expansion of a use by more than 50 percent of the original approved

Special Use Permit on the same parcel may be accomplished by a major amendment tothe approved Special Use Permits, per Title 19.16.110(M). The proposed expansion is264 percent of the land use entitlement of 694 square feet. A major amendment to the previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-54904) is required.



12/06/95

The City Council approved requests for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0045-95) from ML (Medium-Low Density Residential) to SC (ServiceCommercial), a Rezoning (Z-0082-95) from N-U (Non-Urban) (underResolution of Intent to C-1 (Limited Commercial) to C-1 (LimitedCommercial) and a Site Development Plan Review (Z-0082-95) for a 101,248square-foot office complex at 7331 West Charleston Boulevard. ThePlanning Commission and staff recommended approval.



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR




01/26/98

The City Council approved an Extension of Time [Z-0082-95 (2)] request for

an approved Site Development Plan Review (Z-0082-95) for a 101,248square-foot office complex. The Planning commission and staffrecommended approval.

12/19/12

The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-46696) request for a694 square-foot Massage Establishment use with a Waiver to allow a 35-footdistance separation from a residentially zoned property where 400 feet isrequired at 7331 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #130. The PlanningCommission Recommended approval.

07/15/14

The Department of Planning Administratively approved a Special Use Permit(SUP-54904) request for a Minor amendment to Special Use Permit (SUP-46696) to relocate and expand an existing Massage Establishment use from

7331 West Charleston, Suite #130 to 7331 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite#120.




10/20/98A building permit (#98021161) was issued for an office building at 7311West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was not finalized.

03/26/01

A building permit (#1005043) was issued for a tenant improvement at 7311

West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #110. The permit was finalized on06/29/01.

12/30/13A business license (M12-99665) was issued for an Independent MassageTherapist at 7331 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #120. This license isactive as of 06/17/15.

07/23/14A business license (G62-06216) was issued for General Retail Sales at 7331West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #120. This license is active as of06/17/15.

08/27/14A business license (P62-00206) was issued for a Massage Establishment at7331 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #120. This license is active as of06/17/15.


04/29/15

A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittalrequirements to relocate and expand an existing Special Use Permit (SUP-54904) for a Massage Establishment Use from 7331 West CharlestonBoulevard, Suite #120 to 7311 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #110.



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR




A neighborhood meeting is not required for this application, nor was one held.

Field Check

06/04/15Staff conducted a routine site visit that revealed a well maintained officecomplex.


Site Area

Net Acres 4.49

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject PropertyOffice, Other than

ListedSC (ServiceCommercial)


NorthSingle-Family,

DetachedML (Medium Low

Density Residential)R-CL (Single Family

Compact-Lot)

SouthGeneral Retail Store,

Other Than ListedSC (ServiceCommercial)


EastSingle-Family,

DetachedDR (Desert Rural

Density Residential)R-E (Residence Estates)

West General Retail Store,Other Than Listed








Trails N/A


Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/AProject of Regional Significance N/A


Pursuant to Site Development Plan Review (Z-0082-95), Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following

parking standards apply:



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR



Parking Requirement

Use

Gross

Floor Areaor Number

of Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Office, otherthan listed

97,941 SF 1:400 SF* 327

GeneralPersonalService

1,650 SF 1:250 SF 7

General Retail 963 SF 1:175 SF 6

MassageEstablishment

9 Rooms

2 : Table/Room /

Chair with aminimum of

6 spaces

18



*Parking requirement for this property was determined by Site Development Plan Review (Z-0082-95).

Proposed and existing locations and size

Address Suite Size Percentage ofincrease/decreaseOriginal 7331 West Charleston Boulevard 130 694 SF

Existing 7331 West Charleston Boulevard 120 849 SF

Proposed 7311 West Charleston Boulevard 110 2,531 SF 264 % increase

ANALYSIS

The Massage Establishment use is defined by Title 19.18 as: “A facility which is occupied andused for the purpose of practicing massage therapy as defined in LVMC Chapter 6.52. This usedoes not include the use “accessory massage”, as defined in this Title.”

The applicant meets the definition of a Massage Establishment, as the applicant intends torelocate and expand the existing Massage Establishment located at 7331 West CharlestonBoulevard, Suite #120 [associated with Special Use Permit (SUP-54904)] to 7311 WestCharleston Boulevard, Suite# 110.

Title 19.16.110(M) allows for a minor amendment of an approved Special Use Permit, if therelocation of the use is on the same legal parcel as the original approval, and where any reduction



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR



or expansion of the originally approved floor area is less than 50 percent and an additional ormore intense Waiver is not required. In this case, the original entitlement was for a 694 square-

foot massage establishment. The relocation is within a building and suite on the same parcel;however, the expansion is 264 percent of the original land use entitlement. A major amendmentis required to allow the proposed size of 2,531 square feet.


1. The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title 6.

This requirement will be met, as it is condition of approval and the business will receive

regular inspections throughout the licensing process.

2. The use must be located on a secondary thoroughfare or larger.

This requirement is met, as primary access is from Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot

Primary Arterial, and secondary access is from Tenaya Way, an 80-foot Major Collector.

3. The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school, City

park, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or any parcel zoned for

residential use.

This requirement is not met, as there are residential zoned properties 35 feet from the subject site; however, a distance separation Waiver was approved in conjunction with

Special Use Permit (SUP-46996).

4. The use may not be located within 1,000 feet of any other massage establishment.

This requirement is met, as the existing massage establishment will be relocated and

there are no other massage establishments within 1,000 feet.

5. The hours of operation shall be limited to the period between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.,

unless further limited by the City Council on a case-by-case basis.

This requirement is met; per the justification letter provided the hours of operations willbe 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. seven days a week.

On December 19, 2012, the City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-46696) for a 694square-foot Massage Establishment use with a Waiver to allow a 35-foot distance separation



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR



from a residentially zoned property where 400 feet is required at 7331 West CharlestonBoulevard, Suite #130. There was a minor amendment to Special Use Permit (SUP-54904) to

move (to 7331 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #120) and expand the use (to 849 square feet).The applicant has requested to relocate the existing Special Use Permit and distance separationWaiver to 7311 West Charleston Boulevard, Suite #110. By transferring the existing Special UsePermit, there is only one Massage Establishment use on this property. The proposed expansionand relocation meets code requirements, as a distance separation Waiver from a protected property was previously approved. The use has been conducted in a harmonious and compatiblemanner within this office complex for more than three years and should continue to do so in thefuture. For these reasons staff recommends approval of this request; however, if denied the usecan remain open and operational at the current location of 7331 West Charleston Boulevard,Suite #120.






If approved, this will be the third location and second expansion of the Massage

Establishment use on this property. The proposed use should have no impact on theexisting single-family residential uses to the north, as the current use has existed for overthree years without any reported incidents. There is not a church/house of worship, school,and City park, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children within 400 feet ofthe site or a similar use within 1,000 feet of the site. This use can continue to be conductedin a harmonious and compatible with the existing and future land uses.


The use is in existing office complex that has adequate circulation and parking, as there isdirect access to Charleston Boulevard and Tenaya Way and the complex has cross access

and shared parking throughout.



Primary access to the site is provided by Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot wide PrimaryArterial. Secondary access is provided by Tenaya Way, an 80-foot wide Major Collector.



SUP-59509 [PRJ-59117]

MR





General Plan.

The proposed use will be subject to conformance with licensing requirements andinspection, thereby safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.


With the exception of the previously approved distance separation Waiver, all otherminimum Special Use Permit Requirements as outlined by Title 19.12 are met.


NOTICES MAILED 252

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ՙ

SUP-59509



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ՙSUP-59509



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱ ՙ

S U P - 5 9 5 0 9



ｘ″゜ｘฎ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱ ՙ

SUP-59509 - REVISED



S U P - 5 9 5 0 9

[ P R J - 5 9 1 1 7 ] -

S P E C I A L U S E

P E R M I T

- A P P L I C A N T : G

R A C E F U L F A C I A L S

& B O D Y W O R K

-

O W N E R : P I N E S O F F I C E C E N T E R , L L C

7 3 1 1 W E S T C H A R L E S T O N B O U L E V A R D , S U

I T E # 1 1 0

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ՙSUP-59509







SUBJECT:SUP-59536 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:CENTENNIAL PROPERTY, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use PermitFOR A PROPOSED 70 SQUARE-FOOT AUTO SMOG CHECK USE WHERE SERVICESARE PERFORMED OUTSIDE AN ENCLOSED STRUCTURE on the north side of AzureDrive, 934 feet west of Tenaya Way (APN 125-27-113-006), TC (Town Center) Zone, [GC-TC(General Commercial - Town Center) Special Land Use Designation], Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59382]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:






SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CENTENNIAL PROPERTY, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under the Town Center DevelopmentStandards for an Auto Smog Check use.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan

3. Conformance to the approved conditions of approval for Site Development Plan Reviews(SDR-58544 and SDR-46278).








SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Special Use Permit for an Auto Smog Check use within a proposed 70square-foot building located 934 feet west of the northwest corner of Azure Drive and TenayaWay.. The site has land use approval for an Auto Repair, Major Use and Auto Paint and Bodyshop uses. An administrative Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59537) accompanies thisapplication and is dependent upon the outcome of this application to move forward. A SpecialUse Permit is required, as this project does not meet all the minimum conditional userequirements for the Auto Smog Check use within Town Center. Staff supports this applicationfor an Auto Smog Check use, as the smog inspections will be performed outside the structure,

but the companion Site Development Plan Review adequately screens the use from the adjacentright-of-way. Staff recommends approval of this application, as it is consistent with the existingauto repair uses within the development.

ISSUES

An Auto Smog Check use is conditionally permitted in the GC-TC (General Commercial-Town Center) Land Use District; however, the conditional use requirement that “all service

shall be performed within a completely enclosed structure” is not met; therefore, a SpecialUse Permit is required.



12/07/98The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) to T-C (Town Center) onthe subject property as part of a larger request.

10/17/12

The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification (MOD-46280)from SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use Town Center) to GC-TC (GeneralCommercial – Town Center), a Special Use Permit (SUP-46275) for an AutoPaint & Body Repair Shop with a Waiver to allow outside storage of wreckedor disabled vehicles and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-46278) for a

Paint & Body Repair Shop with a Waiver to allow a zero-foot wide landscapealong the northern property line where eight-foot is required at 7200 WestAzure Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

04/01/15

The Department of Planning administratively approved a Site DevelopmentPlan Review (SDR-58544) request for a 6,178 square-foot Auto Repair, MajorBuilding located approximately 743 west of the northwest corner of Azure Diveand Tenaya Way.



SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR






10/30/13

A building permit (#227728) was issued for an Auto Body Repair building at7350 West Azure Drive. The permit was finalized on 05/18/15.

A building permit (#227728) was issued for onsite improvements at 7350West Azure Drive. The permit was finalized as of 04/29/15.

05/28/15A building permit (#288969) was applied for an Auto Lube building. Anaddress will be assigned before the building permit is issued. The permit hasnot been issued as of 06/18/15.


05/18/15

A meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the submittal process and procedures for a Special Use Permit for an Auto Smog Check use and anAdministrative Site Development Plan Review for the 70 square-foot autosmog building.



Field Check

06/08/15A field inspection was conducted on the subject site, which revealed that thecollision building is finished and on-site improvements were close tocomplete.


Site Area

Net Acres 5.36

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property

Shopping Center GC-TC (GeneralCommercial – Town

Center)T-C (Town Center)Auto Repair Garage

(Major)



SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR



Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


NorthElectric Utility

Substation

SX-TC (SuburbanMixed-Use – Town

Center)T-C (Town Center)

South

UndevelopedGC-TC (General

Commercial – TownCenter)

T-C (Town Center)

General Retail StoreSX-TC (Suburban

Mixed-Use – TownCenter)

East Shopping CenterGC-TC (General

Commercial – Town

Center)

T-C (Town Center)

West UndevelopedGC-TC (General

Commercial – TownCenter)

T-C (Town Center)



Montecito Town Center Y




Trails N/A



Project of Regional Significance Y

Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped Regular

Handi-capped

Auto RepairGarage(Major)

38,053 SF1:200 SF plus 5spaces

196

Auto RepairGarage(Major)

6,178 SF1:200 SF plus 5spaces

36



SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR



Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Auto SmogCheck

70 SF 1 space 1


Regular and Handicap Spaces

Required 7 7 236 7

Y

Loading Spaces 3 3 Y

ANALYSIS

Per the Town Center Development Standards Manual, the proposed Auto Smog Check use isconditionally permitted in the GC-TC (General Commercial-Town Center) Land Use District, solong as all of the conditional requirements listed below are met:

a. All service shall be performed within a completely enclosed structure.

This condition is not met, resulting in this Special Use Permit application.

b. If conducted as an accessory use of a Service Station or an Auto Repair (Major orMinor), the facility shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the primary building on the site.

This is a stand-alone Auto Smog Check building and this condition does not apply;however, the applicant has proposed a building that meets this requirement perelevations date stamped 05/28/15.

c. When operated as a primary use, no other automobile repair shall be permitted inconjunction with the facility.

This condition will be met. The business will undergo continuous inspections through the

licensing review process.

d. No required parking spaces shall be used or eliminated to provide the facility.

This condition is me. The site plan date stamped 05/28/15 illustrates that more thanminimum parking for the site is provide.



SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR



e. Any permanent structure shall have a Site Development Plan Review, per LVMC

19.16.100.

This application will be met, as Administrative Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59537) awaits the outcome of this application.

f. Service bay doors shall not face public right of way and shall remain closed except toallow the entry or exit of vehicles

This condition is met, as no service bay is provided.

The proposed Auto Smog Check use will be located in the GC-TC (General Commercial - Town

Center) Special Land Use designation. Typical uses associated with the General CommercialDistrict include all types of retail, service, office and other general business uses of a moreintense commercial character. These uses will normally require a Special Use Permit and willcommonly include limited outdoor display of product and lights or other characteristics notgenerally compatible with the adjoining residential areas without significant transition. Examplesinclude new and used car sales, highway commercial uses such as hotels and motels, and touristcommercial uses such as resorts and recreational facilities.

Previous Site Development Plan Reviews, SDR-46278 and SDR-58544, approved two autorepair related buildings for this development. The first building was for an Auto Paint & BodyRepair Shop and the second building was for an Auto Repair Garage (Major) use. An

Administrative Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59537) for a proposed 70 square-foot AutoSmog Check structure accompanies this application; however, it is on hold awaiting the outcomeof this application. The location of the proposed building allows for adequate vehicularcirculation onto and around the site. The building has been sited behind the existing landscape buffer and in manner that should screen the vehicle emission checks from the public right-of-wayand allow for vehicle stacking and servicing. The addition of the Auto Smog Check use isconsistent with the existing uses approved on site and surrounding land uses.

The subject property is within 500 feet of the County of Clark’s jurisdiction; therefore, thisrequest qualifies as a Project of Regional Significance. All the proper documents werecompleted and distributed to the required departments and agencies; however, no comments

were returned.

In summation, Staff recommends approval of this request, as the use complies with coderequirements and can be conducted harmoniously with existing neighborhood and surroundingland uses.



SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR








The proposed Auto Smog Check use does not meet all the Conditional Use Regulations,resulting in the need for the Special Use Permit. The proposed use is consistent with theapproved auto repair garage and paint and body shop within the development. This use can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner with the existing and future land

uses.


This development has adequate parking and site circulation for the proposed use. If neededthere is room for vehicle stacking or queuing. The site is physically suitable for a numberof auto repair and maintenance uses including the proposed Auto Smog Check use.



This site primary access is from Azure Drive, a 94-foot Loop Road, as defined by theTown Center Development Standards. This street is adequate in size to meet therequirements of the proposed use.



General Plan.

Approval of this requested Special Use Permit is consistent with the overall objectives ofthe General Plan and Town Center Development Standards.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Town Center DevelopmentStandards.

The requested Auto Smog Check does not meet all applicable Conditional UseRegulations, as vehicle emission tests cannot be performed within an enclosed building.Measures have been taken to adequately screen the building and serving area; therefore,staff supports this Special Use Permit application.



SUP-59536 [PRJ-59382]

MR




NOTICES MAILED 274

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱฎธ

SUP-59536



Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ Ќこ⇡ ผ ОŐİ ㄦɱฎ ธ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ゜О ħ ħਙ ਙผ ƆⓈО Ŵ₡ Aこħ ƆＣŐ

Оผਙ ㈾㌱ A₡₡ผ ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙỏ ɱ ㅡ ǲǲ ╗ÛǲƆ ╗Ḷ ╗Ġǲ ЌḶŐ╗ĠÛǲƆ ╗ḶŐЌǲŐ Ḷ AΎⓈŐǲ ＣŐ●Ћǲ AЌＣ ╗ǲЌA A

Оผਙ ㈾㌱ ЌŴこ ƆҜḶḚ ●ḶƆ


″ｘｘںںธㄦธՙں

ÛŴผ₡

Û AŐＣ ″ ӧƆ ╗ǲЋǲЌ Ｃ㈠ ŐḶƆƆỏ


ਙผผ ㌱


Ḛ

ผŴк ОкŴ Ｃ ħف

Ŵ

ħਙ Оผਙऑਙ ₡ Ɔ

к

㌱


Ḛผਙ A㌱ผ

Ձਙ Ⓢħ


Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħผ ЌŴこ ħŴк

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Оผਙऑ ผ ՁՁ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ A₡₡ผ ħ ผ Ｃผħفՙｘｘ ╗Ŵں

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħ Ġ ₡ ผਙ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ɔ Ŵ Ќ ǲЋ AＣ A ӧЌ Ћỏ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ύħऑ ฎɱ

ںں

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Оγਙ ՙｘธ″ฎｘ″ｘ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ŵゥ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ǲこŴħк

ＣŴ㌀ʉ ㌱ ਙこγਙこ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ő ऑ ħผ ЌŴこ Ձ

Ő ऑ ՁŴ ЌŴこ ЌŴ

Ő ऑ A₡₡ผ ธㄦՙㄦ Ҝਙ ਙผħ Ɔ ผ ธｘｘ

Ő

ऑ ħ

ՁŴ Ћ ف

Ŵ

Ő ऑ Ɔ Ŵ Ќ Ŵ₡Ŵ

Ő

ऑ Ύħऑ ฎɱںں

Ő ऑ Оγਙ ՙｘธ″ฎｘ″ｘ

Ő ऑ Ŵゥ

ՙｘธ″ฎｘ″ ㄦ

Ő ऑ ǲこŴħк Ձ ㌀ʉ ㌱ ਙこγਙこ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ธｘ″ ОҜں ㄦ ㅡں ㄦ゜ธฎ゜ธｘں


ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱฎธSUP-59536







⇡ кħ ⑾㈠ ● ₡ ผ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ ħ







γ ऑผਙऑ ผ ħ ਙк ₡ ħ γħ




A㌱㌱ ऑ



Ḷʉ ผӧỏ AＣＣŐں AＣＣŐธǲЌ╗ǲЌЌ● AՁ ОŐḶОǲŐ╗ Ձ Ձ ″ธฎｘ Û Ա AＣⓈŐA A Ћǲ ՁAƆ ЋǲḚ AƆⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎɱںںฎ ㅡ″ՙธ


Ő Ŵผк ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف Ɔผ ╗ ㌱γħ㌱Ŵк Ɔ こ AŴк ผ㌱Ŵผк ㌀кŴ Ŵف Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠فਙ

Ձ

ЌŴ Ɔ Û ਙここ

ผ㌱ħŴк AＣ ҜŴŴف

ผ к ㌀ʉ ㌱ ਙこγਙこ

㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ธ ਙㄦ゜ธฎ゜ธｘ ںㄦ ㅡ ںธｘ″ ОҜ


ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱฎธSUP-59536



Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ

О Ձ A Ќ

फ ए

ｘ ƥ ㈠ｘ

ｘ


О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ฎ ธ



Ɔ ● ╗ ǲ

О Ձ A Ќ

फ ए

ｘ ƥ ㈠ｘ

ｘ





ｘ ″ ゜ ธ ธ ゜ㄦ




₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ऑ

ħ ਙ

ਙ

Ա Ḷ Ձ Ձ A Ő Ｃ ʉ

゜ ƥ Ա Ḷ Ձ Ձ A Ő Ｃ Ḛ A Ő Ｃ ƥ Ḷ Ћ ǲ Ő

Ɔ ǲ ǲ Ｃ ǲ ╗ A ● Ձ Ա ǲ Ձ Ḷ Û

㌱ Ŵ

к

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

О Ŵ ผ

ħ Ŵ к Ɔ ħ

О к Ŵ

Ќ Ḷ ╗ Ⓢ Ɔ ǲ Ｃ

ɱ ƥ ｘ फ ɱ ƥ ｘ फ ɱ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ƥ ″ फ

ｘ ƥ ｘ फ

ㄦ ƥ ″ फ

㌱ Ŵ

к

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

ǲ ゥ

ผ ħ ਙ ผ

ǲ к

Ŵ ħ ਙ

Ő ǲ A Ő

Ő Ḷ Ќ ╗

Ő ● Ḛ Ġ ╗ Ɔ ● Ｃ

ǲ

Ɔ Ҝ Ḷ Ḛ

Ɔ Ҝ Ḷ Ḛ Ġ ǲ

ธ

㌱ Ŵ

к

゜ ธ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

к ਙ ਙ ผ

О к Ŵ

ฎ ƥ ՙ फ

फ ธ ゜ ธ फ ″ ƥ ㅡ फ फ

ɱ ƥ ՙ फ

ɱ

゜ ธ फ

ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

ㄦ

゜ ธ फ

ՙ ƥ फ

ธ ゜ ธ फ

फ ธ ゜ ธ फ ″ ƥ ㅡ फ फ ธ ゜ ธ फ

ㄦ

゜ ธ फ ɱ

゜ ธ फ

ㅡ ㌱ Ŵ

к

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

Ő ਙ ਙ

⑾ О к Ŵ

″

㌱ Ŵ

к

゜

ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

ผ Ŵ こ

ħ

О к Ŵ

ՙ

㌱ Ŵ

к

゜ ธ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

Ɔ

㌱ ħ ਙ

ƥ ㅡ फ

ɱ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ㅡ फ फ ɱ ƥ ՙ फ ฎ फ

ｘ ƥ ″ फ

ธ फ

ธ फ

ธ फ

ธ फ

ธ ㅡ फ फ ɱ ƥ ՙ फ ฎ फ

ฎ ƥ फ ฎ फ

A Ա

A ธ

ՙ Ա

ՙ A

A ธ

ՙ A

A ธ

ㄦ

㌱ Ŵ

к

゜ ㅡ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

ਙ

₡ Ŵ

ħ ਙ

ɱ ƥ ՙ फ

ฎ ƥ ՙ फ

फ ″ ƥ ɱ फ फ

ɱ ธ फ

ฎ ƥ ｘ फ

ɱ ธ फ

फ ″ ƥ ɱ फ फ

Ɔ Ҝ Ḷ Ḛ Ġ ǲ

● Ḷ Ɔ

ธ ƥ ɱ फ ธ ƥ ｘ फ

फ

Ҝ ● Ќ ㈠

Ա Ḷ Ձ Ձ A Ő

ＣＣ ǲ ╗ A ● Ձ

ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

″ ƥ ㅡ फ

ՙ ƥ ｘ फ

Ձ ǲ ╗ Ɔ ● Ｃ ǲ





ƆҜḶḚ ●ḶƆ

ḶՁḶŐ ԱḶAŐＣОŐİㄦɱฎธ

ОŐ●ҜAŐ ḶՁḶŐ

ผŴ▷ ОŴħש Ձ ธㄦＣО ⇡кਙ

ผŴ▷ ОŴħש Ձธㄦฎ″ЌÛγ к ԱŴผผਙʉ

Û●ЌＣḶŐ゜ＣḶḶŐ ╗Ő●Ҝ ḶՁḶŐ

γ שש Աผਙ▷

Ɔ╗ḶЌǲ

Ḷк₡ ਙשผ Ձ ₡ف ŴผŴこ к Ҝש

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱฎธ

SUP-59536



S U P - 5 9 5 3 6 [ P R J - 5

9 3 8 2 ] - S P E C I A L U S E P E

R M I T - A P P L I C A N T / O W N

E R : C E N T E N N I A L P R O P E R T Y , L L C

N O R T H S I D E O F A

Z U R E D R I V E , 9 3 4 F E E T

W E S T O F T E N A Y A W A Y

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ธㄦՙㄦ Ҝਙ ਙผħ Ɔ ผ ⓒ Ɔħ ธｘｘⓒ ՁŴ Ћ ″ ՙ ӧՙｘธỏںںŴⓒ ЌЋ ฎɱف ฎｘ″ｘ Ŵゥ ӧՙｘธỏ ″ ฎｘ″ㄦ

Ձħ㌱ｘｘՙɱฎ ÛÛÛ㈠ƆⓈЌÛǲƆ╗ⓈƆ╗ḶҜĠḶҜǲƆ㈠ḶҜں

ㄦ゜ธฎ゜ธｘㄦ

╗ਙ Ûγਙこ ● ҜŴ ਙ㌱ ผ

Û Ŵผ ħف Ŵऑऑผਙ فŴк ਙ Ŵ₡₡ Ŵ Ɔこਙٹ ħਙ ਙ ऑŴผ㌱ к ธㄦ ธՙ ｘｘ″ Ŵкਙف A▷ผ Ｃผ㈠ ●

ħ γ ħ ⑾ਙผ ਙ ਙ⑾ γ ऑŴผħ ف ऑŴ㌱ ħ γ Ŵผ Ŵ ਙ ⇡ こŴ₡ ħ ਙ Ŵ こਙف ㌱γ ㌱ ħਙਙ こਙف ٹ γħ㌱к ㈠ ╗γ ħਙ ħ こ Ŵ ਙ ㌱ਙこऑкħこ ਙ γ ผ ゥħ ħف Ŵ ਙ ผ ऑŴħผ ⇡Ŵ ₡⇡ħ ਙ γ ऑŴผ㌱ к Ŵкħ ⓒ ׀ ผٹ ħ㌱ ⓒ Ŵऑऑ ŴผŴ㌱ ⓒ Ŵ₡ ㌱ਙٹ ħ ㌱㈠

Û ऑผ ₡ħ㌱ ਙ ħこऑŴ㌱ ਙ ผŴ⑾⑾ħ㌱㌱ਙ₡ħ ħਙ ʉħ γ γ ਙऑ ħفਙ⑾ γħ ⇡ħ ⓒ ਙผ γਙк₡ ħ Ŵ⑾⑾ ㌱ γ ผผਙ₡ħ ف ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡㈠ ● ʉħкк γਙʉٹ ผ ऑผਙٹħ₡ γ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ ʉħ γ Ŵ こਙผ ㌱ਙこऑผ γ ħٹ Ŵ ਙ ผ ऑŴħผ ⇡Ŵ ₡ ㌱ ผ Ŵ₡ ਙ⑾⑾ ผ ㌱ਙこ ผ Ŵ ㌱ ผŴк кਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙ ⑾ਙผ こŴ ਙ⑾γ ħผ ผف кŴผ Ŵ ਙこਙ ħٹ こŴħ Ŵ㌱ ₡㈠

╗γŴ ਙ ⑾ਙผ ਙผ ㌱ਙħ₡ ผŴ ħਙ ħ γħ ₡ Ŵٹਙผ㈠

Ɔħ㌱ ผ кⓒ

ＣŴħ к Ɔ㈠ ਙк ħОผ ħ₡

Ŵ ӧ ธỏ

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱฎธ

SUP-59536







SUBJECT:VAC-59307 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TEN15 CRAIGTENAYA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate A DRAINAGEEASEMENT generally located adjacent to the northwest corner of Craig Road and U.S. 95,Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59091]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Supporting Documentation - VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]3. Photo(s) - VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

4. Justification Letter - VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION:


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAC-59307 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

SDR-59306 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: VAC-59307

** CONDITIONS **

VAC-59307 CONDITIONS

1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the Public Drainage Easement granted throughdocument 20070911:03159 generally located at the northwest corner of Craig Road andInterstate 95.

2. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation for this

application. Appropriate drainage easements shall be reserved if recommended by theapproved Drainage Plan/Study. The drainage study required by SDR-59306 may be used tosatisfy this requirement provided that it addresses the area to be vacated.

3. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation application areto be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of an Order ofVacation.

4. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have beenmet provided, however, the conditions requiring modification of public improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the performance

thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff isempowered to modify this application if necessary because of technical concerns or becauseof other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are stillcomplied with and the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If applicable, a fivefoot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on allvacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public easement corridors and sightvisibility or other easements that would/should cross any right-of-way being vacated must beretained.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB

Conditions Page Two


5. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards of allCity Departments.

6. If the Order of Vacation (or Order of Relinquishment of Interest if a Patent Reservation) isnot recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of Las Vegas or an Extension ofTime is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will terminate and a new petitionmust be submitted.


Planning


2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan, date stamped06/17/15 and building elevations, date stamped 05/14/15, except as amended by conditionsherein.

3. A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a 10-foot wide landscape buffer

along a portion of the eastern perimeter where 15 feet is the minimum required.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed incompliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and Safety.


6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, LandscapeArchitect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the sametime application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system is

required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape planshall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of anytraffic control device.

7. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet withDepartment of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the subject site. Acopy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any future building permitapplications related to the site.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB

Conditions Page Two


8. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants andwater supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of any

combustible structures.


Public Works

10. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks adjacent to

this site on Craig Road in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if any, tothe satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.

11. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. Alllandscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated andmaintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at alldevelopment access drives and abutting street intersections.

12. Contact the City Engineer’s Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development of this project with the “Sewer Rehabilitation Group F” project and any other public improvement

projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer.

13. Meet with the Fire Protection Engineering Section of the Department of Fire Services to

discuss fire requirements for the proposed use of this facility. The design and layout of allonsite private circulation and access drives shall meet the approval of the Department of FireServices.

14. Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) for all private improvements in the Craig Road public right-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site priorto constructing any improvements within NDOT jurisdiction.

15. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of PublicWorks prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of any constructiondrawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site, whichever may occur first.

Comply with the recommendations of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis prior tooccupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include a section addressingStandard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and #234.3 to determine additional right-of-wayrequirements for bus turnouts adjacent to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended bythe approved Traffic Impact Analysis. All additional rights of way required by StandardDrawing #201.1 for exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated priorto or concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless specificallynoted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased compliance will be



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB



allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. No recommendation ofthe approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify

or eliminate any condition of approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the CityCouncil on the development of this site.

16. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits orsubmittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve alldrainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study. The developer of this siteshall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvementsas are recommended by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approvedDrainage Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site. We note that this site is withina Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) designated flood zone and that no

permits of any kind will be issued until after the Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR) is approved by FEMA.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review and Vacation for three proposedcommercial buildings totaling 9,850 square feet on a 2.30 acre portion of an existing commercialsubdivision at the northeast corner of Craig Road and Tenaya Way. The applicant has requestedan Exception of planting materials within the southern landscape buffer and within the parkinglot. Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development in thearea, and the requested landscaping materials Exception will have a minimal negative impact tothe surrounding commercial development. Therefore, staff is recommends approval of this project with conditions.

ISSUES

There is an existing drainage easement located along the eastern perimeter of the subject siteestablished through “Craig Tenaya” commercial subdivision map Book 77, Page 38, whichmust be vacated to facilitate the proposed development.

A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is required, to allow a 10-foot wide landscape buffer alongthe eastern perimeter where 15 feet is the minimum required.

Applicant has requested an Exception of planting materials within the southern landscape buffer and within the parking lot.



04/19/89The City Council approved a petition of Annexation [A-0003-89(A)] of one parcel of land totaling 22 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Craig Roadand U.S. 95.

12/15/93

The City Council approved a request for Rezoning (Z-0105-93) from N-U(Non-Urban) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on property located on thenortheast corner of Craig Road and Tenaya Way. The Planning Commissionrecommended approval of the request on 11/18/93.

02/15/06

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review(SDR-10355) for a proposed 3,200 square foot convenience store and a 7,243square foot car wash/auto repair, minor with associated gas pumps and awaiver of the parking lot landscaping requirements on 2.30 acres adjacent tothe northwest corner of Craig Road and U.S. 95. The Planning Commissionrecommended approval of the project on 01/12/06.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB




The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-10356)

for a beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment in a proposed convenience storeon 2.30 acres adjacent to the northwest corner Craig Road and U.S. 95. ThePlanning Commission recommended approval of the project on 01/12/06.

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-10357)for an Auto Repair Garage, Minor use on 2.30 acres adjacent to the northwestcorner Craig Road and U.S. 95. The Planning Commission recommendedapproval of the project on 01/12/06.

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-10359)for a Car Wash/Auto Detail use on 2.30 acres adjacent to the northwest cornerCraig Road and U.S. 95. The Planning Commission recommended approvalof the project on 01/12/06.

The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-10909)for a Service Station use on 2.30 acres adjacent to the northwest corner CraigRoad and U.S. 95. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the project on 01/12/06.




01/06/05

A Code Enforcement case (#24934) was processed for the illegal dumping oflawn clippings causing the drain to back-up on property located adjacent tothe northwest corner Craig Road and U.S. 95. The case was resolved on01/14/05.

04/18/07A Code Enforcement case (#52273) was processed for overgrown weeds withtrash and debris on property located adjacent to the northwest corner CraigRoad and U.S. 95. The case was resolved on 05/01/07.


04/28/15

Staff met with the applicant to review the requirements submittal procedures

for a Site Development Plan Review for a proposed 9,850 square-footcommercial development comprised of three buildings within an existingcommercial subdivision.





VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB



Field Check

06/04/15

During a routine site inspection staff noticed the subject site was a well

maintained undeveloped pad in an existing shopping center.


Site Area

Net Acres 2.30

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Undeveloped SC (ServiceCommercial) C-1 (LimitedCommercial)

North UndevelopedSC (ServiceCommercial)


Shopping CenterSC (ServiceCommercial)


South Shopping CenterSC (ServiceCommercial)


East US Highway 95 ROW (Right-of-Way) ROW (Right-of-Way)

West Shopping CenterSC (ServiceCommercial)







Trails N/A





Pursuant to 19.08, the following standards apply:





VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB




Min. Setbacks

Front Side (west)

Side (east)

Rear



YYYY

Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 9.8 % Y

Max. Building Height Pad “A” N/A 22.25 Feet Y

Max. Building Height Pad “B” N/A 23 Feet Y

Max. Building Height Pad “C” N/A 19.50 Feet Y

Trash Enclosure

Screened, Gated, w/a Roof or Trellis

Screened,Gated, w/

a Roof orTrellis

Y

Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to note the applicable code section here Title 19.08, the following standards apply:



Ratio Trees

Buffer Trees:

North

South East

West

1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet

1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet1 Tree / 0 Linear Feet

0 Trees

19 Trees5 Trees0 Trees

0 Trees


Y

N*YY




27 Trees 25 Trees N*

LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS

Min. Zone Width

North

South

East

West


0 Feet16.5 Feet12 Feet0 Feet

Y**YYY

Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Not Indicated Y

*The applicant has requested an Exception for planting materials within the south landscapebuffer and parking lot.** A 5.5-foot wide landscaping buffer has been proposed along a portionof the lot line the subject parcel shares with the parcel to the north, which is also part of therecorded Craig Tenaya Commercial Subdivision.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB



Street NameFunctional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliancewith Street

Section

Craig Road Primary ArterialMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways 115 Feet Y

Tenaya Way Minor CollectorMaster Plan of Streets &

Highways60 Feet Y


Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

ShoppingCenter(68,607 SFExisting +9,850 SFProposed)

78,457 SF 1:250 SF 314



LoadingSpaces

78,457 SF 4 5 Y

Exceptions


One 24-inch box tree is requiredwithin the southern and easternlandscaping buffer; 1 Tree / 6

Uncovered Spaces, plus 1 tree atthe end of each row of spaces

To provide ten (10) 24-inch box trees in thesouthern and eastern

landscaping bufferwhere 24 trees arerequired and 25 parkinglot trees where 27 treesare required

Approval



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB



ANALYSIS

The subject site is located in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, which allows forretail and commercial uses of a medium-to-low intensity character. The applicant has proposedto develop the site with three commercial buildings totaling 9,850 square feet on a 2.30 acre portion of an existing commercial subdivision at the northeast corner of Craig Road and TenayaWay.

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59306) for three proposedcommercial buildings with a drive through totaling 9,850 square feet on 2.30 acre portion of anexisting commercial subdivision at the northeast corner of Craig Road and Tenaya Way; with aWaiver to allow a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along the eastern perimeter where 15 feet is theminimum required. In addition, the applicant has also requested a Vacation (VAC-59307) of an

existing drainage easement generally located adjacent to the northwest corner of Craig Road andU.S. 95. The area requested to be vacated is within a Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA) designated flood zone and the applicant will need an approved drainage study beforethis easement can be vacated.

The proposed site design complies with all applicable Title19.08.070 site design requirements pertaining to building setbacks, which requires a 10-foot distance separation from the front andside yard setback and 20 feet from the rear. The proposed buildings will cover approximately9.5% of the 2.30 acres site, which is below the 50% lot coverage maximum allowed by code.The proposed structures range in height from 19.5 to 23 feet measured to the top of the parapet.The submitted building elevations indicate the building façades will have a bi-color “Brown

Eyes” and “Sundown” and paint finish with a decorative “Plum Creek”, “Vintage Wine” stackedveneer accents and re-claimed wood siding.

The site will provide 105 total parking spaces with six van-accessible handicapped parkingspaces, which exceeds the 40 spaces required by Title 19.12.010 for a shopping center land use.The parking area also provides space for one loading zones and two trash enclosures, which have been designed to comply with Title 19.08 standards.

The applicant has requested an Exception of planting materials within the southern landscape buffer and within the parking lot, to provide ten (10) 24-inch box trees in the southern andeastern landscaping buffer where 24 trees are required and 25 parking lot trees where 27 trees are

required. The primary tree species utilized for landscaping are the 24” box Blue Palo Verde, 24” box Sweet Acacia, 24” box Mesquite trees, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada

Regional Plan Coalition – Regional Plant List. In addition, the applicant has requested a Waiverto allow 10-foot wide landscape buffers along a portion of the east perimeter where the minimumrequired is 15 feet. Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with surroundingdevelopment in the area; and the requested landscaping planting material Exceptions will have aminimal negative impact to the surrounding commercial development. Therefore, staff isrecommends approval of this project with conditions.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB







The proposed commercial development is compatible with adjacent commercial andresidential development in the area. The proposed structures range in height from 19.5 to23 feet and are contextually appropriate with other buildings in the area, the applicant has provided the sufficient landscaping, creating an attractive commercial development.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, the DesignStandards Manual, the Landscape, Wall and Buffer Standards, and other duly-


The proposed commercial development is consistent with the General Plan and complieswith all Title 19 development standards; with the exception of the requested Waiver fromto allow a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along the eastern perimeter where 15 feet is theminimum required and exception of planting materials within the provided landscape buffers and parking lot.



The site is accessed from Craig Road a 100-foot Primary Arterial and Tenaya Way a 60-foot Minor Collector, as classified by the City of Las Vegas Master Plan of Streets andHighways and will easily carry the minimal amount of traffic this proposed developmentwill generate.


The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will beharmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building elevations

indicate the building façades will have a bi-color “Brown Eyes” and “Sundown” and paintfinish with a decorative “Plum Creek”, “Vintage Wine” stacked veneer accents and re-claimed wood siding. The primary tree species utilized for landscaping are the 24” boxBlue Palo Verde, 24” box Sweet Acacia, 24” box Mesquite trees, which are consistentwith the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition – Regional Plant List.



VAC-59307 and SDR-59306 [PRJ-59091]

JB





orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatiblewith development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and arecompatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable for thesurrounding commercial uses and the desert environment.


general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to protect

the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

FINDINGS (VAC-59307)

Staff has no objection to the vacation application request to vacate a Public Drainage Easementgenerally located west and north of the intersection of Craig Road and U.S. 95. We note that thearea requested to be vacated is within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)designated flood zone and the applicant will need an approved drainage study before this easementcan be vacated. This Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities however, as no right of wayis proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for

responses from any of the public utilities. Furthermore, we recommend that this item be declaredFinal Action at the Planning Commission. We note that a replacement drainage easement hasalready been submitted to the City and we will not record the new easement until after this vacationrecords.

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 23 - VAC-5930727 - SDR-59306

NOTICES MAILED 2 - VAC-59306

359 - SDR-59306

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ

ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



ｘ ″ ゜ ՙ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ｘ ɱ

V A C - 5 9 3 0 7 a n d S D R - 5 9 3 0 6 - R E V I S E D



ｘ ″ ゜ ՙ ゜ㄦ


V A C - 5 9 3 0 7

a n d S D R - 5 9 3 0 6

- R E V I S E D



ｘ ″ ゜ ՙ ゜ㄦ


V A C - 5 9 3 0 7 a n

d S D R - 5 9 3 0 6 - R

E V I S E D



ｘㄦ゜ ㅡ ゜ㄦ


C

9 3 0

S

9 3 0 6





V A C 5 9 3 0 7

a n d S D R 5 9 3 0 6





V A C - 5 9 3 0 7 a n d S D R - 5 9 3 0 6



ｘ″゜ㄦ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307 and SDR-59306





V A C - 5 9 3 0 7 a n d S D R - 5

9 3 0 6





V A C

- 5 9 3 0 7 a n d S D R

- 5 9 3 0 6



ｘㄦ゜ ㅡ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307 and SDR-59306



AОЌ ฎ ｘ ″ ｘｘㄦ

ḶÛЌǲŐ ╗ǲЌ ㄦ ŐA●Ḛ ╗ǲЌAA ՁՁ

ОŴ ں

ǲṲĠ●Ա●╗ ਫA㈚

ǲṲОՁAЌA╗●ḶЌ

╗Ġ●Ɔ ＣǲƆŐ●О╗●ḶЌ ŐǲОŐǲƆǲЌ╗Ɔ A ЋAA╗●ḶЌ Ḷ A ●╗ Ḷ ՁAƆ ЋǲḚAƆ ＣŐA●ЌAḚǲ ǲAƆǲҜǲЌ╗㈠

ＣǲƆŐ●О╗●ḶЌ

A ОḶŐ╗●ḶЌ ╗Ġǲ ƆḶⓈ╗ĠÛǲƆ╗ ỢⓈAŐ╗ǲŐ ӧƆÛ ں ゜ㅡỏ Ḷ ╗Ġǲ ЌḶŐ╗ĠǲAƆ╗ ỢⓈAŐ╗ǲŐ ӧЌǲ ゜ㅡỏںḶ Ɔǲ╗●ḶЌ ⓒ ╗ḶÛЌƆĠ●О ธｘ ƆḶⓈ╗Ġⓒ ŐAЌḚǲ ″ｘ ǲAƆ╗ⓒ Ҝ㈠Ｃ㈠Ҝ㈠ⓒ ●╗ Ḷ ՁAƆ ЋǲḚAƆⓒՁAŐ ḶⓈЌ╗ⓒ ЌǲЋAＣAⓒ ҜḶŐǲ ОAŐ╗●ⓈՁAŐՁ ＣǲƆŐ●ԱǲＣ AƆ ḶՁՁḶÛƆ

ǲAƆǲҜǲЌ╗

╗Ġǲ ǲAƆ╗ ㄦｘ ǲǲ╗ Ḷ ╗Ġǲ ՁḶ╗ AƆ ƆĠḶÛЌ ḶЌ ╗Ġǲ ŐǲḶŐＣ Ḷ ƆⓈŐЋǲ ●Ձǲ ںںں

ОAḚǲ ธธ ●Ќ ╗Ġǲ ՁAŐ ḶⓈЌ╗ ŐǲḶŐＣǲŐƆ Ḷ●ǲⓒ ՁAŐ ḶⓈЌ╗ⓒ ЌǲЋAＣA㈠

ƆA●Ｃ ǲAƆǲҜǲЌ╗ ḶŐḚ●ЌAՁՁ ＣǲＣ●A╗ǲＣ ḶЌ ОAŐǲՁ ҜAО ●Ќ ●Ձǲ ՙฎⓒ ОAḚǲ ㄦฎⓒŐǲḶŐＣǲＣ ●Ќ ╗Ġǲ ՁAŐ ḶⓈЌ╗ ŐǲḶŐＣǲŐƆ Ḷ●ǲⓒ ՁAŐ ḶⓈЌ╗ⓒ ЌǲЋAＣA㈠

ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ VAC-59307



ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ

ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



ｘ″゜ㄦ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



ｘ″゜

ㄦ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

VAC-59307



V A C - 5 9 3 0 7

[ P R J - 5 9 0 9 1 ] -

V A C A T I O N

R E

L A T E D

T O

S D R - 5 9 3 0 6

- A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : T E N 1 5

C R A I G

T E N A Y A , L L C

N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R O F C R A I G R O A D A N

D U . S . 9 5

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



İਙγ ＣŴ

ħ₡ Աผ

ⓒ Aผ㌱γħש

㌱ש

Ŵ Оผਙ⑾ ħਙŴк ਙผऑਙผŴשħਙ

Aऑผħк ธｘⓒ ธｘㄦ

ħש ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћف Ŵ Ｃٹ кਙऑこ ש Ɔผ ٹħ㌱ Ќਙผ ٹγ ŐŴ㌱γਙ Ｃผħש

ՁŴ Ћف Ŵⓒ Ќٹ Ŵ₡Ŵ ฎɱ ｘ″

Ő Ɔħ ש Ｃٹ кਙऑこ ש Őٹ ħ ʉ Ɔ⇡こħששŴк İⓈƆ╗●●A╗●ḶЌ Ձǲ╗╗ǲŐ

AОЌ ฎ ｘ ″ ｘｘㄦ

╗γ ऑкŴ ⇡こħשש ₡ ₡ ਙ₡Ŵש ऑħ㌱ש Ŵ ऑผਙऑਙ₡ ऑŴ₡ ⑾ ٹผ ₡ש кਙऑこ ש ਙשγ Ŵ⇡ਙٹ こשħਙऑŴผ㌱ к㈠ ╗γ ㌱ผผ

ש

ש

Ŵש

ਙ⑾ש

γ ħש

ħ ₡ٹ

кਙऑ ₡㈠

ОAＣ A ╗γħ ऑŴ₡ ʉħкк ⇡ ㌱ਙשผ㌱ש ₡ Ŵ Ŵ ⑾שผ ⓒธㅡｘ ׀Ŵผ ⑾ਙਙש ธש Ŵש ⇡ħк₡ħف㈠ Aऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ₡ผħٹ ש γผ ʉħкк ⇡ ऑผਙٹħ₡ ₡ ⑾ਙผ ਙ ש Ŵש㈠ Աਙשγ ש Ŵש ʉħкк γŴٹ Ŵ㌱㌱ ਙ Ŵ ऑผਙऑਙש ₡

ऑŴשħਙ שผ ʉŴ㈠ A㌱㌱ ħ⇡к ħ₡ʉŴк ʉħкк ผ ٹ Ŵ㌱㌱ ਙש γש ⇡ħк₡ħف שผŴ㌱㈠ ╗γ ⇡ŴкŴ㌱ ਙ⑾ γש ऑŴ₡ ʉħкк ⇡ שγਙผਙفγк кŴ₡㌱Ŵऑ ₡㈠

ОAＣ Ա ╗γħ ऑŴ₡ ʉħкк ⇡ ㌱ਙשผ㌱ש ₡ Ŵ Ŵ ⑾שผ ㅡⓒธ ｘ ׀Ŵผ ⑾ਙਙש ผ שŴผŴש㈠ A ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ₡ผħٹ⇡ γผ ʉħккש ऑผਙٹħ₡ ₡ ⑾ਙผ γħש ש Ŵש㈠ A ⑾שผ ऑŴשħਙ ʉħкк ⇡ ऑผਙٹħ₡ ₡ ਙ γש ਙשγ ħ₡ ਙ⑾שγ⇡ħк₡ħف㈠ ╗γ ⇡ŴкŴ㌱ ਙ⑾שγ ऑŴ₡ ʉħкк ⇡ שγਙผਙفγк кŴ₡㌱Ŵऑ ₡㈠

ОAＣ ╗γħ ऑŴ₡ ʉħкк ⇡ ㌱ਙשผ㌱ש ₡ Ŵ Ŵ ⑾שผ ธⓒธｘｘ ׀Ŵผ ⑾ਙਙש ㌱ਙ⑾⑾ γਙऑ㈠ A ऑผਙऑਙ₡₡ผħٹ ש γผ ʉħкк ⇡ ऑผਙٹħ₡ ₡ ⑾ਙผ γħש ש Ŵש㈠ A ⑾שผ ऑŴשħਙ ʉħкк ⇡ ऑผਙٹħ₡ ₡ ਙ γש ਙשγ ħ₡ ਙ⑾שγ ⇡ħк₡ħف㈠ ╗γ ⇡ŴкŴ㌱ ਙ⑾שγ ऑŴ₡ ʉħкк ⇡ שγਙผਙفγк кŴ₡㌱Ŵऑ ₡㈠

ҜŴゥ Ɔħש ОŴ₡ Ｃٹ кਙऑこ ש ╗γħ ऑŴผ㌱к ħ ħ γש ｘｘ Ŵผ ⑾кਙਙ₡ ▷ਙ ㈠ ╗γ ₡ٹ кਙऑ ผ γŴऑผ ऑŴผ ₡ γש ŴऑऑผਙऑผħŴש ₡ผŴħŴف ש₡ שਙ ㌱ਙこऑкש к ผ こਙٹ γש ऑŴผ㌱к ⑾ผਙこ γש ▷ਙ㈠ ╗γħ

ש₡ ऑผਙٹħ₡ Ŵ₡₡ħשħਙŴк ׀Ŵผ ⑾ਙਙשŴف ▷ਙ こŴゥħこħש γש ਙ⑾שγ ऑผਙऑผ ש ऑผਙٹħ₡ħف Ŵ₡₡ħשħਙŴккŴ₡㌱Ŵऑħف Ŵ₡ ऑŴผħف㈠ ╗γħ ש₡ γŴ Ŵкผ Ŵ₡ ⇡ ⇡こħשש ₡ ਙש γש кਙਙ₡ ਙשผਙк Ｃħשผħ㌱ש ⑾ਙผ ผ ٹ ħ ʉ㈠ A⑾ ש ผ γש ƆＣŐ ŴऑऑผਙٹŴкⓒ שħこŴש₡ ʉħкк кשγħ ש к ਙف γש ǲҜA ⑾ਙผ ⑾ħŴк ŴऑऑผਙٹŴк㈠

●㌱к₡ ₡ⓒ ʉħкк ⇡ γש ħਙ ਙ⑾ ŴשŴ㌱Ŵٹ ゥħשħف ₡ผŴħŴف Ŵ こ ש ऑผ ㌱ħٹħк ש₡ ħ㌱к₡ ₡㈠

╗ਙ ₡Ŵש ⓒ γש γਙผ ਙ⑾ ਙऑผŴשħਙ ⑾ਙผ ОAＣ A ʉħкк ⇡ Ŵ שŴ₡Ŵผ₡ ՙŴこ ਙ ㄦऑこ㈠ ОAＣ Աש ОAＣ

ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ⇡ ਙש Ŵ ธㅡ γਙผ ₡ผħٹ ש γผ Ŵ㌱㌱㈠

ǲŴ㌱γ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ⇡ħк₡ħف γŴкк ⇡ ਙ⑾ ਫǲŴผ שγ ╗ਙ ₡㈚㌱ਙкਙผ ʉħשγ ₡ ㌱ਙผŴשħٹ שਙ Ŵ₡ ผ ㌱кŴħこ ₡

ʉਙਙ₡ ⑾ħħγ ऑ ผ γש ħ㌱к₡₡ кٹ Ŵשħਙ㈠

Ɔħ㌱ ผ кⓒ

İḶĠЌ ＣAЋ●Ｃ ԱⓈŐǲⓒ Aผ㌱γħש ㌱ש

ㅡں

Û

ש

Ḷ׀

₡ਙ Ő₡㈠ⓒ Ɔħש

ｘں

ⓒ ՁŴ Ћف

Ŵⓒ Ќ

Ŵ₡Ŵ ฎɱںں

ฎⓒ ӧՙｘธỏฎՙ″ ㅡฎ″ⓒ ⑾Ŵゥ ӧՙｘธỏฎՙ″ ɱㄦㄦⓒ ㈾⇡ผ

㌀㈾⇡ผ

Ŵผ㌱γħש

㌱ש

㈠㌱ਙこㄦㄦⓒ ㈾⇡ผ

㈾⇡ผ

Ŵผ㌱

ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

SDR-59306 and VAC-59307







SUBJECT:SDR-59306 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-59307 - PUBLICHEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TEN15 CRAIG TENAYA, LLC - For possible action on arequest for a Site Development Plan Review FOR THREE PROPOSED COMMERCIALBUILDINGS TOTALING 9,850 SQUARE FEET WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 10-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE15 FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 2.30 acres adjacent to the northwest corner ofCraig Road and U.S.95 (APN 138-03-611-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4(Anthony) [PRJ-59091]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.





RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup2. Location and Aerial Maps3. Supporting Documentation





paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜

ㅡ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘɱ

SDR-59306



SDR 59306

Ten15 Craig Tenaya, LLC

NWC Craig Road & US95

Proposed 9.85 thousand square feet of fast food restaurants.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

Existing Use DESCRIPTION #UNITRATE/#

UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000

SF]9.85

496.12 4,887

AM Peak Hour 45.42 447

PM Peak Hour 32.65 322

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Craig Road

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 20,275

PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 1,622

Tenaya Way


PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 861

Adjacent Street ADT Capacity

Craig Road 51,800

Tenaya Way 25,400

This project is expected to add about 4,887 trips per day on Craig Rd. & Tenaya Wy. Currently, Craig is at about 39percent of capacity and Tenaya is at about 42 percent of capacity. With this project, Craig is expected to be at about 49percent of capacity and Tenaya to be at about 62 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 447 trips in the peak hour, or about fifteen every two minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.







SUBJECT:VAC-59399 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS 9-B, LLC, ETAL - OWNER: EAGLE CREST LL, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition toVacate ALL EXISTING PUBLIC EASEMENTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF AN EXISTINGPUBLIC DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE WEST AND SOUTH PROPERTY LINES at5850-5900 Sky Pointe Drive, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58107]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report

3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS 9-B, LLC, ET AL - OWNER:

EAGLE CREST LL, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** CONDITIONS **


1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be all of the unused public easements granted

in the owner’s certificate and on the notes of Page 140, File 10 and Page 140, File 11 ofPlats on Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 125-27-302-011 and 125-27-302-012.

2. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation applicationare to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the recordation of anOrder of Vacation.

3. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modification of public improvementsmay be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las

Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because oftechnical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is notchanged. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that willremain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, publiceasement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross anyright-of-way being vacated must be retained.



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK

Conditions Page Two


4. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design standards ofall City Departments.

5. If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City ofLas Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approvalwill terminate and a new petition must be submitted.



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is petitioning to Vacate public easements within the common areas of an existingapartment complex at 5850 and 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. The subject site was originallyconstructed as a multi-family apartment complex. In 2008, the applicant obtained approval toconvert the apartment complex to a condominium complex, which required the interior privatestreets to be easements for street lights, conduits, traffic signals and fire hydrants. Additionally, a blanket drainage easement was created for all areas of the site not occupied by a building.Subsequently, in 2015, a Reversionary Map was recorded, which converted the condominiums

back to apartments. However, the easements from the previously approved condominiumcomplex remained. The applicant is currently requesting to relinquish those easements. Staffsupports the request, as the easements are no longer needed and the relinquishment of theeasements will ensure that the property is free of unnecessary public easement restrictions.

ISSUES

The existing easements were dedicated to the city of Las Vegas for a previously approvedcondominium conversion, which has been abandoned. As a result, the public easementsdedicated to that conversion are no longer necessary.



09/21/94

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0093-94) from N-U (Non-Urban)and C-2 (General Commercial) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) and R-PD18 (Residential Planned Development – 18 Units per Acre) on propertylocated south of Tropical Parkway, east of Sky Pointe Drive and west ofTenaya Way.

02/15/06

The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10199)

for the conversion of a 312-unit apartment project to a condominiumdevelopment on 16.04 acres at 5580 Sky Pointe Drive. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.

The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10200)for the conversion of a 312-unit apartment project to a condominiumdevelopment on 15.06 acres at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK




05/11/06

The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-12638) for a

312-unit condominium conversion on 15.06 acres at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive.Staff recommended approval.

The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-12639) for a312-unit condominium conversion on 16.04 acres at 5850 Sky Pointe Drive.Staff recommended approval.

08/03/06

Staff approved a Final Map (FMP-14245) for a 312-unit condominiumconversion on 16.04 acres at 5850 Sky Pointe Drive. The Final Map recordedon 05/08/08.

Staff approved a Final Map (FMP-14247) for a 312-unit condominiumconversion on 15.06 acres at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. The Final Map recordedon 05/08/08.

04/02/08

The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-26928) of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10200) for theconversion of a 312-unit apartment project to a condominium development on15.06 acres at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. Staff recommended approval.

The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-26930) of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-10199) for theconversion of a 312-unit apartment project to a condominium development on16.04 acres at 5850 Sky Pointe Drive. Staff recommended approval

11/18/13

Staff approved a Final Map (FMP-51812) for reversion of an existing 312-unit residential condominium subdivision to the previously recorded parcel on15.06 acres located adjacent to the east side of Sky Pointe Drive,approximately 250 feet south of Ranch House Road. The Final Map recordedon 12/17/14.

Staff approved a Final Map (FMP-51813) for reversion of an existing 312-unit residential condominium subdivision to the previously recorded parcel on16.04 acres located adjacent to the east side of Sky Pointe Drive,approximately 1,410 feet south of Ranch House Road. The Final Maprecorded on 12/22/14.




c.1997The existing 312-unit multi-family development was constructed at 5850 and5900 Sky Pointe Drive.



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK




05/07/08A building permit (#27715) civil drawing was approved to convert anapartment complex to a condominium complex at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit was finalized on 08/07/08.

04/29/14A code enforcement citation (#140582) was issued for illegal temporary banner signs at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. The citation was resolved on08/18/14.

07/22/14A building permit (#265492) was issued for a development statement sign at5850 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit received a final inspection on 12/08/14.

10/16/14A building permit (#267125) was issued for a tenant improvement to remodelan existing clubhouse at 5850 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit received a final

inspection on 05/04/15.

03/17/15A building permit (#282173) was approved for a wrought iron fence aroundan existing pool at 5900 Sky Pointe Drive. The permit has not received a finalinspection.


02/25/15

Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the representative to discussthe proposed Vacation request. The applicant stated the purpose of the requestwas to vacate all easements on the property except for a 20-foot wide publicdrainage easement located adjacent to Sky Pointe Drive. The submittalrequirements for a Vacation submittal were also discussed.



Field Check

06/04/15Staff performed a routine field check and noted a well maintained multi-family complex.


Site Area

Gross Acres 31.1



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK



Surrounding Property

Existing Land Use Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special Land Use Designation


Subject PropertyMulti-FamilyResidences

M (Medium DensityResidential)

R-PD18 (ResidentialPlanned Development –

18 Units per Acre)

North

Single FamilyResidences

ML (Medium LowDensity Residential)

R-PD7 (ResidentialPlanned Development – 7

Units per Acre)

UndevelopedGC (GeneralCommercial)

C-2 (GeneralCommercial)

South

Single Family

Residences

ML (Medium Low


R-CL (Single Family

Compact-Lot)

Motor Vehicle Sales(New)

SC-TC (ServiceCommercial – TownCenter) Special Land

Use Designation

T-C (Town Center)

EastSingle Family

ResidencesML (Medium Low

Density Residential)R-CL (Single Family

Compact-Lot)

WestMotor Vehicle Sales

(New)

SC-TC (ServiceCommercial – TownCenter) Special Land

Use DesignationT-C (Town Center)GC-TC (General

Commercial – TownCenter) Special Land

Use Designation





R-PD (Residential Planned Development) District YOther Plans or Special Requirements Compliance

Trails N/A






VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK




Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Sky Pointe Drive Major CollectorMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways 72 Feet N

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Eagle Crest Condominiums Unit 1

Explanation

This land description describes easements on a parcel of land generally located northwesterly ofSky Pointe Drive for easement vacation purposes.

Legal Description

Those city of Las Vegas easements for the construction, maintenance, operation and finalremoval of public street lights, conduits, traffic signals and appurtenances, if any, and public firehydrants, together with the rights of ingress to and egress therefrom, along with a public drainage

easement on said parcel over all areas not occupied by a building, granted on the plat of "EagleCrest Condominiums Unit 1", on file in the Clark County, Nevada recorder's office in book 140of plats, page 10, situate within the North Half (N 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) ofSection 27, Township 19 South, Range 60 East, M.D.M., city of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada. Excepting therefrom a 20' public drainage easement granted under and depicted on said plat, bordering Sky Pointe Drive.

Eagle Crest Condominiums Unit 2

Explanation

This land description describes easements on a parcel of land generally located northwesterly ofSky Pointe Drive for easement vacation purposes.

Legal Description

Those city of Las Vegas easements for the construction, maintenance, operation and finalremoval of public street lights, conduits, traffic signals and appurtenances, if any, and public firehydrants, together with the rights of ingress to and egress therefrom, along with a public drainage



VAC-59399 [PRJ-58107]

GK



easement on said parcel over all areas not occupied by a building, granted on the plat of "EagleCrest Condominiums Unit 2", on file in the Clark County, Nevada recorder's office in book 140

of plats, page 11, situate within the North Half (N 1 /2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) ofSection 27, Township 19 South, Range 60 East, M.D.M., city of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada. Excepting therefrom a 20' public drainage easement granted under and depicted on said plat, bordering Sky Pointe Drive and the southerly border of said parcel.

ANALYSIS

This petition is a clean-up measure to remove the remnant public easements no longer needed froman abandoned condominium conversion. As a result, the existing development will remain as anapartment complex and those easements dedicated for the condominium conversion are no longer

needed. These include public easements for the construction and maintenance of public streetlights,conduits, fire hydrants and traffic signals. In addition, the vacation includes the public drainageeasements over all areas not occupied by an existing building except the 20-foot wide publicdrainage easement adjacent to Sky Pointe Drive, along the west and south property lines, which willremain.


This Petition to Vacate would eliminate the public easements that were granted through acondominium conversion. The conversion has been abandoned and the multi-family

development will remain as an apartment complex. The Department of Public Works has noobjection to the vacation application request to vacate the “blanket” Public Drainage Easementand certain existing public infrastructure easements located at 5850 – 5900 Sky Pointe Drive.This Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities however, as no right of way is proposedto be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for responsesfrom any of the public utilities. Staff therefore recommends approval with conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 4

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ ｘՙ

VAC-59399




О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ｘ ՙ

V

A C - 5 9 3 9 9





V

A C - 5 9 3 9 9





V A C - 5 9 3 9 9





V

A C - 5 9 3 9 9





V A C - 5 9 3 9 9



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎ ｘՙ

V A C - 5 9 3 9 9




V A C - 5 9 3 9 9



V A C - 5 9 3 9 9 [ P R J - 5 8 1 0 7 ] - V A C A T I O N

- A

P P L I C A N T : L A S

V E G A S

9 - B , L L C , E T

A L - O W

N E R : E A G L E

C R E S T L L , L L C

5 8 5 0 - 5 9 0 0 S K Y P O

I N T E D R I V E

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



İ ħ ⑾ ħ ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ Ձ ผ

ОŐǲAООธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ธ

╗γ Ŵ ऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ ħ к Ŵف к ㌱ਙ к ⓒ ผ ऑ ผ ħ ف ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ɱ Ա ⓒ ՁՁ Ŵ₡ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ɱ Ա ● ● ⓒ ՁՁⓒ γ

⑾ਙผこ ผ ਙʉ ผ ਙ⑾ γ ǲ Ŵ ف к ผ AऑŴผ こ ӧⓈ ħ Ŵ₡ ธ ỏ кਙ ㌱ Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ㄦɱｘｘ Ŵ₡ ㄦ ฎㄦｘ Ɔ Оਙ ħ Ｃ ผ ħ ٹ ⓒ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵف ⓒ Ќ Ŵٹ ₡ Ŵ ӧA㈠ О ㈠ Ќ ㈠ ธㄦ ธՙ ｘธ ｘ ں ں Ŵ₡ ธㄦ ธՙ ｘธ ｘں ธ ỏ ӧ γ ਫО ผਙऑ ผ ㈚ ỏ ㈠ ╗γ ħ Ŵऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ ħ ਙ ħ Ŵ

⑾ਙผこŴ к ผ ׀ ⑾ਙผ ผ к ħ ׀ ħ γこ ਙผ Ŵ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ ਙ⑾ Ŵ こ ħ ㌱ਙここਙ Ŵ ผ Ŵ γŴ ʉ ผ ₡ ₡ ħ ㌱ Ŵ ₡ ਙ

γ ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ₡ ผ ㌱ਙ₡ਙこ ħ ħ こ㌱ਙ ٹ ผ ħ ਙ ⇡₡ ħ ٹ ħ ħ ਙ こŴऑ ผ ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ ħ ธｘｘฎ ㈠ ╗γ ผ ׀ ħ

こ Ŵ₡ ਙ γ ผ ਙ ₡ γŴ γ ㌱ਙ₡ਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ ผ ħ ਙ γŴ ٹ ⇡ Ŵ⇡Ŵ ₡ਙ ₡ ⊿ ผ ٹ ผ ħ ਙŴ ผ こŴऑ ⑾ਙผ ⇡ਙ γ

ऑ ผਙ ㈾㌱ ʉ ผ ผ ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ ਙ Ｃ㌱こ⇡ ผ ธธ ⓒ ธｘ ںㅡ ⓒ ऑ ผ ₡ ħ ف γ ธｘｘฎ こŴऑ ħ ʉγ ħ ㌱ γ Ŵ こ ʉ ผ

₡ ₡ ħ ㌱ Ŵ ₡ ਙ γ ħ ӧ⇡ ਙ ผ ٹ ผ ħ ف ਙผ Ŵ㌱Ŵ ħ ف Ŵ ゥ ħ ħ ف Ŵ こ ỏ ⊿ Ŵ ₡ γ ħ γŴ ऑผ

ゥħ ħ ف ӧŴ к γ ਙ فγ ਙ ħ ₡ ħ ㌱ Ŵ к ỏ Ŵ こ ʉγ ħ ㌱ γ ʉ ħ к к ผ こŴ ħ Ŵ ⑾ ผ γ ผ ׀ ₡ ผ к ħ ׀ ħ γこ㈠

Aऑऑк ħ ㌱Ŵ ɸ A γਙผ ħ ਙ Ɔ⇡こ ħ Aऑऑк ħ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ

● İ к ⓒ ธｘ ں ⓒ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ɱ Աⓒ ՁՁ Ŵ₡ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ɱ Ա ● ● ⓒ ՁՁ ӧ ਫAऑऑ к ħ ㌱Ŵ ㈚ ỏ ਙ к₡ γ О ผਙऑ ผ ਙ ╗γ

ԱŴ ㌱ਙこ Ḛผਙऑ ⓒ Ձ Ձ Ŵ₡ ǲŴ ف к ผ ՁՁ ⓒ ՁՁ ӧਫ ผ ผ Ḷʉ ผ ㈚ ỏ ㈠ Ⓢ ₡ ผ γ О ผ ㌱ γ Ŵ Ŵ ₡ ƆŴ к A فผ こ

⑾ਙผ γ Ŵ Ŵ к ⓒ ผ ผ Ḷʉ ผ Ŵ₡ Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ Ŵ فผ ₡ γ Ŵ Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ ʉਙ к ₡ ⓒ Ŵこਙ ف ਙ γ ผ γ ħ ف ⓒ ㌱ਙここ ผ ㌱ ħ Ŵ к к ผ Ŵ ਙŴ⇡ к ⑾⑾ਙผ ਙ ผ ㌱ਙ ผ₡ ผ ٹ ผ ħ ਙŴ ผ こŴऑ Ŵ فŴ ħ γ О ผਙऑ ผ ਙ ผこ ħ Ŵ ゥħ ħ ف

㌱ਙ₡ਙこ ħ ħ ここŴऑ Ŵ ₡ ਙ ਙ⇡ Ŵ ħ γ Ŵ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ ਙผ ผ к ħ ׀ ħ γこ ਙ⑾ ผ ㌱ਙผ₡ ਙ⑾ γ Ŵ こ ผŴ ₡ ħ

⑾Ŵ ٹਙผ ਙ⑾ γ ħ Ŵ₡ ਙ γ ผ ₡ ผ γਙ ㌱ ਙ ₡ਙこ ħ ħ ここŴऑ ㈠ Ɔ ⓒ Ő ħ Ŵ こ ਙ⑾ Ŵ ₡ Ɔ ㌱ਙ₡

Aこ ₡こ ਙ О ผ ㌱γ Ŵ Ŵ ₡ ƆŴ к A فผ こ ӧ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ Ŵ ⑾ ħ к ਫ ОŐǲAООธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ОƆ ㈠ऑ ₡ ⑾㈚ ⓒ Ŵ Ɔ ㌱ ħ ਙ

ㄦ ӧ ㌱ ỏ ⓒ ऑ ㈠㈠

ӧAऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ ㌱㌱ ₡ ₡ ħ ผ ㌱ਙ ผ₡ ħ ف ผ ٹ ผ ħ ਙŴ ผ こŴ ऑ ⑾ਙผ γ О ผਙऑ ผ Ŵ₡ γ Ŵ ਙ⇡ Ŵ ħ ₡ Ŵ

ผ к Ŵ ਙ⑾ γ Ḷ⑾⑾ Ɔħ ● こ ऑ ผ ਙ ٹ こ A فผ こ О ผ ⑾ਙ ผこŴ㌱ Աਙ ₡ γ Ŵ ʉŴ ผ ׀ ħ ผ ₡ ħ ㌱ਙ ㌱ ħ ਙ

ʉħ γ γ ผ ㌱ਙ ผ₡ ħ ف ਙ⑾ γ ㌱ਙ₡ਙ こŴऑ ㈠ ỏ

ǲ Ŵ к ผ Ⓢ ħ ⊿ ㄦɱｘｘ Ɔ Оਙħ Ｃผħ ٹ ⓒ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ

Ձ Ŵ к Ｃ㌱ผ ħऑ ħ ਙ

Ő Ŵ к ऑ ผਙऑ ผ ħ γ ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ⓒ ਙ ਙ⑾ кŴ ผ ⓒ Ɔ Ŵ ਙ⑾ Ќ Ŵٹ ₡ Ŵ ⓒ

₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ⇡ ₡ Ŵ ⑾ਙ к кਙʉ

╗γ Ŵ ऑਙผ ħ ਙ ਙ⑾ γ Ќ ਙผ γ Ġ Ŵк ⑾ ӧЌ ≠ỏ ਙ⑾ γ Ɔਙ γʉ ỢŴผ ผ ӧ ƆÛ ⊁ỏ ਙ⑾ Ɔ ㌱ ħ ਙ

ธՙⓒ ╗ਙʉγ ħ ऑ ɱ Ɔਙ γ ⓒ Ő Ŵ ف ″ｘ ǲŴ ⓒ Ҝ ㈠Ｃ㈠ Ա ㈠ Ҝ ㈠ ⓒ こਙผ ऑŴ ผ ħ ㌱ к Ŵ ผ к ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ⇡ ₡

Ŵ ⑾ਙ к кਙʉ

ОŴ ผ ㌱ к ں Ŵ γਙʉ ⇡ こŴऑ γ ผ ਙ⑾ ਙ ⑾ħ к ħ ħ к ฎ ਙ⑾ ОŴผ㌱ к Ҝ Ŵऑ ⓒ ОŴ ف ㅡ ⓒ ħ

γ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ਙ⑾ γ ਙ Ő ㌱ਙผ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ кŴ ผ ਙ ⓒ Ќ Ŵٹ ₡ Ŵ ㈠

Ő ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ Ｃਙ㌱こ Ŵ ●

Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ γ Ŵ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ γ ਙ ㈠ Ŵ₡ ਙ⑾ γ ǲ Ŵ ف к ผ ਙ₡ਙこ ħ ħ こ Ⓢ ħ

㌱ਙ₡ਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ ผ ħ ਙ こŴऑ ผ ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ Ҝ Ŵ ฎⓒ ธｘｘฎ ӧ Ŵ ⑾ ħ к ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲ ںҜ ｘｘ ں ㈠ ऑ ₡ ⑾ Ŵ₡

ธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲ ںҜ ｘｘ㈠ ऑ₡⑾㈚ ỏ ㈠ Û Ŵ ผ ผ ħ׀ ف Ŵ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ ਙ⑾ γ ⑾ਙ к к ਙʉ ħ ف ㌱ਙここਙ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

Ŵ こ ผŴ ₡ ਙ γ ħ ₡ ผ γ Ŵ こŴऑ

ں

ں ｘｘ ں ㈠ ऑ ₡ ⑾ Ŵ₡

ħ ف ㌱ਙここ ਙ Ŵ Ŵ

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ ｘՙ

VAC-59399



ں ỏ

ӧ A ऑ ऑ ผ к ⑾ ਙ⑾ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ㄦⓒ кŴ ऑŴ ผ Ŵ فผ Ŵ ऑ γ ₡ ผ γ Ŵ ₡ ħ ف ਫḶʉ ผ

ผ ħ ⑾ ħ ㌱Ŵ Ŵ ₡ Ｃ ₡ ħ ㌱ Ŵ ħ ਙ ㈚ ỏ ਫ ผŴف ∵ Ŵ₡ ㌱ਙ ٹ ਙ γ ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف

Ŵ ₡ ਙ ħ ㌱㌱ ਙ ผ Ŵ₡ Ŵ ħ ف Ŵ ऑ ผこŴ Ŵ こ ʉħ γ ħ γ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

γਙʉ γ ผ ਙ Ŵ ऑ ผ ħ ٹŴ ผ ⓒ ㌱ਙここ ਙ Ŵผ Ŵ Ŵ ₡ Ŵ к к Ŵ ผ Ŵ ਙ ਙ㌱㌱ऑ ħ ₡

⇡ Ŵ ⇡ ħ к ₡ ħ ف ⑾ਙผ γ ㌱ਙ ผ ㌱ ħ ਙ ⓒ こŴ ħ Ŵ ㌱ ⓒ ਙऑ ผ Ŵ ħ ਙ Ŵ₡ ⑾ħ Ŵ к

ผ こਙ ٹŴ к ਙ⑾ ผ к ħ فγ ⓒ ㌱ਙ₡ ħ ⓒ ผŴ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ħ ف Ŵ к Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ऑ ऑ ผ Ŵ ㌱ ⓒ ħ ⑾ Ŵⓒ

Ŵ ₡ ऑ⇡ к ħ ㌱ ⑾ħ ผ γ₡ ผŴ ⓒ ਙ ف γ ผ ʉħ γ γ ผ ħ فγ ਙ⑾ ħ فผ ਙ Ŵ₡ ผ ف

γ ผ ⑾ ผਙこ㈠㈚

ธ ỏ

ӧ γਙʉ ਙ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ㄦ ỏ ธｘ ɸ О ⇡ к ħ ㌱ＣผŴ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ Ŵ к ਙ ف Ɔ Оਙ ħ

Ｃ ผ ħ ٹ ㈠

ỏ

ӧ к ਙʉ ผ ผ ħ فγ γŴ ₡ ㌱ਙ ผ ผ ਙ⑾ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ㄦ ỏ О ⇡ к ħ ㌱ＣผŴ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ ħ ਫ Ŵ к к

Ŵ ผ Ŵ ਙ ਙ㌱㌱ऑ ħ ₡ ⇡ Ŵ ⇡ ħ к ₡ ħ ف ㈠㈚

Ő ٹ ผ ħਙŴผ ҜŴऑ

Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ γŴ Ŵ к ਙ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ Ŵ ㌱ਙऑ ਙ⑾ γ Ő ٹ ผ ħਙ Ŵผ Ҝ Ŵऑ ਙ⑾ ǲŴ ف к ผ ਙ₡ਙこ ħ ħ こ Ⓢ ħ ӧ Ŵ ⑾ ħ к ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ธ ﹝ǲں ں ŐҜ ｘｘ ں ㈠ ऑ ₡ ⑾ ㈚ Ŵ₡

ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ธ ﹝ǲں ں ŐҜ ｘｘธ ㈠ऑ₡⑾㈚ ỏ ⓒ ʉγ ħ ㌱γ ऑ ผ ₡ γ ธｘｘฎ ㌱ਙ₡ਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ ผ ħ ਙ こ Ŵऑ ⑾ਙผ Ⓢ ħ ⓒ

⇡ Ŵ ħ γ Ќ ਙ Ŵ γ ⇡ਙ ਙこ ਙ ⑾ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ธ γŴ ਫ╗γ ħ ผ ٹ ผ ħ ਙŴ ผ こŴ ऑ ₡ਙ ਙ ผ ٹ ผ ⓒ

ผ к ħ ׀ ħ γ ਙ ผ Ŵ ㌱Ŵ Ŵ ゥ ħ ħ ف Ŵ こ㈠㈚

Ⓢ ħ ǲ Ŵ こ ╗γŴ Ûħк к Ő こŴ ħ ħ Ŵ ٹਙผ ਙ⑾ γ ħ A⑾ ผ Ő ׀ ₡ Ő к ħ ׀ ħ γこ

Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ γŴ Ŵ к ਙ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ Ŵ ㌱ਙऑ ਙ⑾ γ ОŴ ผ ㌱ к Ҝ Ŵऑ ऑ ผ Ŵ ħ ħ ف ਙ Ⓢ ħ ӧ О Ŵ ผ ㌱ к ں ỏ

ӧŴ ⑾ ħ к ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲОҜ ㈠ऑ ₡⑾㈚ ỏ ʉγ ħ ㌱γ γਙʉ Ŵ ㄦ ⑾ ʉħ ₡ О ⇡ к ħ ㌱Ｃ ผ Ŵ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ ਙ Ⓢ ħ

Ŵں кਙ ف Ɔ Оਙ ħ Ｃ ผ ħ ٹ ⓒ γ Ŵ ʉ ħ к к ผ こŴ ħ ħ γ Ŵ ผ Ŵ ਙ⑾ γ ธｘ ⑾ ʉħ ₡ Ŵ こ ⑾ਙผ ʉγ ħ㌱γ

Ŵٹ ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ ħ ⇡ ħ ف ผ ׀ ₡ ㈠

ǲ Ŵ к ผ Ⓢ ħ ธ⊿ ㄦฎㄦｘ Ɔ Оਙħ Ｃผħ ٹ ⓒ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ

Ձ Ŵ к Ｃ㌱ผ ħऑ ħ ਙ

Ő Ŵ к ऑ ผਙऑ ผ ħ γ ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف ⓒ ਙ ਙ⑾ кŴ ผ ⓒ Ɔ Ŵ ਙ⑾ Ќ Ŵٹ ₡ Ŵ ⓒ

₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ⇡ ₡ Ŵ ⑾ਙ к кਙʉ

╗γ Ŵ ऑਙผ ħ ਙ ਙ⑾ γ Ќ ਙผ γ Ġ Ŵк ⑾ ӧЌ ≠ỏ ਙ⑾ γ Ɔਙ γʉ ỢŴผ ผ ӧ ƆÛ ⊁ỏ ਙ⑾ Ɔ ㌱ ħ ਙ

ธՙⓒ ╗ਙʉγ ħ ऑ ɱ Ɔਙ γ ⓒ Ő Ŵ ف ″ｘ ǲŴ ⓒ Ҝ ㈠Ｃ㈠ Ա ㈠ Ҝ ㈠ ⓒ こਙผ ऑŴ ผ ħ ㌱ к Ŵ ผ к ₡ ㌱ ผ ħ ⇡ ₡

Ŵ ⑾ਙ к кਙʉ

ОŴ ผ ㌱ к ธ Ŵ γਙʉ ⇡ こŴऑ γ ผ ਙ⑾ ਙ ⑾ħ к ħ ħ к ฎ ਙ⑾ ОŴผ㌱ к Ҝ Ŵऑ ⓒ ОŴ ف ㅡ ⓒ ħ

γ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ਙ⑾ γ ਙ Ő ㌱ਙผ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ кŴ ผ ਙ ⓒ Ќ Ŵٹ ₡ Ŵ ㈠

Ő ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ Ｃਙ㌱こ Ŵ ●

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ ｘՙ

VAC-59399



Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ γ Ŵ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ γ ਙ ㈠ Ŵ₡ ਙ⑾ γ ǲ Ŵ ف к ผ ਙ₡ਙこ ħ ħ こ Ⓢ ħ ธ

㌱ਙ₡ਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ ผ ħ ਙ こŴऑ ผ ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ Ҝ Ŵ ฎⓒ ธｘｘฎ ӧ Ŵ ⑾ħ к ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲธ Ҝ ｘｘ ں ㈠ ऑ ₡ ⑾ Ŵ₡

ธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲธҜ ｘｘ㈠ऑ₡ ⑾㈚ ỏ ㈠ Û Ŵ ผ ผ ħ׀ ف Ŵ ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ ਙ⑾ γ ⑾ਙ к к ਙʉ ħ ف ㌱ਙここਙ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

Ŵ こ ผŴ ₡ ਙ γ ħ ₡ ผ γ Ŵ こŴऑ

ㅡỏ

ӧ A ऑ ऑ ผ к ⑾ ਙ⑾ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ㄦⓒ кŴ ऑŴ ผ Ŵ فผ Ŵ ऑ γ ₡ ผ γ Ŵ ₡ ħ ف ਫḶʉ ผ

ผ ħ ⑾ ħ ㌱Ŵ Ŵ ₡ Ｃ ₡ ħ ㌱ Ŵ ħ ਙ ㈚ ỏ ਫ ผŴف ∵ Ŵ₡ ㌱ਙ ٹ ਙ γ ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف

Ŵ ₡ ਙ ħ ㌱㌱ ਙ ผ Ŵ₡ Ŵ ħ ف Ŵ ऑ ผこŴ Ŵ こ ʉħ γ ħ γ Ŵ ผ Ŵ

γਙʉ γ ผ ਙ Ŵ ऑ ผ ħ ٹŴ ผ ⓒ ㌱ਙここਙ Ŵ ผ Ŵ Ŵ₡ Ŵ к к Ŵ ผ Ŵ ਙ ਙ㌱㌱ऑ ħ ₡

⇡ Ŵ ⇡ ħ к ₡ ħ ف ⑾ਙผ γ ㌱ਙ ผ ㌱ ħ ਙ ⓒ こŴ ħ Ŵ ㌱ ⓒ ਙऑ ผŴ ħ ਙ Ŵ₡ ⑾ħ Ŵ к

ผ こਙ ٹŴ к ਙ⑾ ผ к ħ فγ ⓒ ㌱ਙ₡ ħ ⓒ ผŴ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ħ ف Ŵ к Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ऑ ऑ ผ Ŵ ㌱ ⓒ ħ ⑾ Ŵⓒ

Ŵ ₡ ऑ⇡ к ħ ㌱ ⑾ħ ผ γ₡ ผŴ ⓒ ਙ ف γ ผ ʉħ γ γ ผ ħ فγ ਙ⑾ ħ فผ ਙ Ŵ₡ ผف

γ ผ ⑾ ผਙこ㈠㈚

ㄦ ỏ

ӧ γਙʉ ਙ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ㄦ ỏ ธｘ ɸ О⇡ к ħ ㌱ＣผŴ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ Ŵ к ਙ ف Ɔ Оਙ ħ

Ｃ ผ ħ ٹ Ŵ ₡ ゥ ₡ ħ ف Ŵ кਙ ف ऑผਙऑ ผ к ħ ʉħ γ О Ŵ ผ ㌱ к ㈠

″ỏ

ӧ ऑ ऑ ผ こ ħ ₡ ₡ к ਙ⑾ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ㄦ ỏ О⇡ к ħ ㌱ＣผŴ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ ħ ਫ Ŵ к к Ŵ ผ Ŵ ਙ

ਙ㌱㌱ऑ ħ ₡ ⇡ Ŵ ⇡ ħ к ₡ ħ ف ㈠㈚

Ő ٹ ผ ħਙŴผ ҜŴऑ

Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ γŴ Ŵ к ਙ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ Ŵ ㌱ਙऑ ਙ⑾ γ Ő ٹ ผ ħਙ Ŵผ Ҝ Ŵऑ ਙ ⑾ ǲŴ ف к ผ

ਙ₡ਙこ ħ ħ こ Ⓢ ħ ธ ӧŴ ⑾ħ к ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲธŐ Ҝ ｘｘ ں ㈠ ऑ ₡ ⑾㈚ Ŵ₡

ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲธŐҜ ｘｘธ ㈠ऑ₡⑾㈚ ỏ ⓒ ʉγ ħ ㌱γ ऑ ผ ₡ γ ธｘｘฎ ㌱ਙ₡ਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ ผ ħ ਙ こ Ŵऑ ⑾ਙผ Ⓢ ħ ธ ⓒ

⇡ Ŵ ħ γ Ќ ਙ Ŵ γ ⇡ਙ ਙこ ਙ ⑾ Ɔγ ਙ⑾ ธ γŴ ਫ╗γ ħ ผ ٹ ผ ħ ਙŴ ผ こŴ ऑ ₡ਙ ਙ ผ ٹ ผ ⓒ

ผ к ħ ׀ ħ γ ਙ ผ Ŵ ㌱Ŵ Ŵ ゥ ħ ħ ف Ŵ こ㈠㈚

Ⓢ ħ

ธ ǲŴ こ

╗γŴ

Ûħк к Ő こŴ ħ ħ Ŵ ٹ

ਙผ ਙ⑾ γ ħ

A⑾

ผ Ő ׀

₡ Ő к ħ ׀

ħ γこ

Aऑऑ к ħ ㌱ Ŵ γŴ Ŵ к ਙ ऑ к ਙ Ŵ ₡ ₡ Ŵ ㌱ਙऑ ਙ⑾ γ О Ŵ ผ ㌱ к Ҝ Ŵऑ ऑ ผ Ŵ ħ ħ ف ਙ Ⓢ ħ ธ ӧ О Ŵ ผ ㌱ к ธ ỏ

ӧ Ŵ ⑾ ħ к ਫธｘ ں ㄦｘｘ ں ں ธ ﹝ǲОҜ ㈠ऑ ₡⑾㈚ ỏ ʉγ ħ ㌱γ γਙʉ Ŵ ㄦ ⑾ ʉħ ₡ О ⇡ к ħ ㌱Ｃ ผ Ŵ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ ਙ Ⓢ ħ

ธ Ŵ к ਙ ف Ɔ Оਙ ħ Ｃ ผ ħ ٹ ⓒ Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ｘ ⑾ ʉħ ₡ О ⇡ к ħ ㌱Ｃ ผ Ŵ ħ Ŵ ف ǲ Ŵ こ Ŵ к ਙ ف γ ऑ ผਙऑ ผ к ħ

ʉħ γ ОŴ ผ ㌱ к γ Ŵ ʉħ к к ผ こŴ ħ ħ γ Ŵ ผ Ŵ ਙ⑾ γ ธｘ ⑾ ʉħ ₡ Ŵ こ ⑾ਙผ ʉγ ħ ㌱γ Ŵ㌱Ŵ ħ ਙ ħ

⇡ ħ ف ผ ׀ ₡ ㈠

ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎ ｘՙVAC-59399







SUBJECT:VAC-59466 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: WAITT-MONTECITO REAL ESTATE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate public drainage easements generally located south of Rome Boulevard and west of GrandMontecito Parkway, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59203]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation

4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter



VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: WAITT-MONTECITO REAL ESTATE,

LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAC-59466 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

** CONDITIONS **


1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the Public Drainage Easement through

documents 20070316:01194 and 20040210:00609 generally located at the southwest cornerof Rome Boulevard and Grand Montecito Parkway.

2. An Update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordationof the Order of Vacation. Provide and improve all drainageways as recommended in theapproved drainage plan/study.



5. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modification of public improvementsmay be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of LasVegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because oftechnical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right



VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR

Conditions Page Two


of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is notchanged. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant

purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that willremain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, publiceasement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross anyright-of-way being vacated must be retained




VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to vacate two drainage easements ranging from 10 to 16 feet wide.The easements are generally located south of the southwest corner of Rome Boulevard andGrand Montecito Parkway. The development plans for the site have evolved and the drainageeasements in their current configuration are no longer needed. As these drainage easements areno longer needed in the current configurations, staff recommends approval. If denied, theexisting drainage easements would remain.

ISSUES

This request for a vacation is consistent with the approved Site Development Plan Reviewsfor an 186,300 square foot, six-story office building and 41,377 square-foot parking structure(SDR-13684) and for a 100 space parking lot (SDR-43790).



07/13/06

The Planning Commission approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-13684) request for an 186,300 square foot, six-story office building and a41,377 square-foot parking structure on 8.01 acres at the southwest corner ofRome Boulevard and Grand Montecito Parkway. Staff recommendedapproval.

11/04/09

The City Council approved a Waiver (WVR-35710) to allow a 394 cubic-footutility box to be set back zero feet from public right-of-way with no requiredlandscaping where three feet of landscaping is required at 6605 GrandMontecito Parkway. The Planning Commission and staff recommendedapproval.

02/15/12

The City Council approved request for a Rezoning (ZON-43792) from U

(Undeveloped) [Town Center) General Plan Designation] to T-C (TownCenter [MS-TC (Main Street Mixed Use – Town Center) Special Land UseDesignation] and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-43790) for a parking lot with Waivers of the Town Center landscape buffer and parking lotlandscaping standards. The Planning Commission and staff recommendedapproval.



VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR




03/04/11 A deed was recorded for APN 125-20-810-002 for a change in ownership.

02/29/12 A deed was recorded for APN 125-20-803-009 for a change in ownership.10/13/14 A deed was recorded for APN 125-2-803-003 for a change in ownership.


10/05/07

A building permit (#7002845) for a two-story parking structure was issued at6603 Grand Montecito Parkway. The permit was finalized on 12/14/09.

A building permit (#7002844) was issued for an office shell building at 6605Grand Montecito Parkway. The permit was finalized on 12/14/09.

10/17/07A building permit (#7002912) was issued for onsite improvements andhardscapes at 6605 Grand Montecito Parkway. The permit has not beenfinalized, as of 06/18/15.

04/19/07

Civic Improvement Plans (L-Civil-18400) were approved for a 186,300square-foot six-story office building and 41,377 square-foot parking structureat Grand Montecito Parkway and the Beltway. The project was finalized on04/23/07.


05/06/15A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant’s designatedrepresentative. The submittal requirements to vacate the public drainage

easements associate with the subject property were discussed.



Field Check

06/04/15A field check was conducted of the subject site, which revealed that the site is partially developed with an office building and parking structure. The site islandscaped and well maintained.


Site Area

Net Acres 13.87



VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR



Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title Town

Center Development Standards

Planned or Special


Subject Property

Office, other thanlisted MS-TC (Main Street

Mixed Use)T-C (Town Center)

Parking Facility

Undeveloped

NorthSingle-Family

ResidencesMS-TC (Main Street

Mixed Use)T-C (Town Center)Public or Private

School, Primary (AnElementary School)

South Freeway Right-Of-Way Right-Of-Way

East Low DensityL – TC (Low Density

Residential)T-C (Town Center)

West UndevelopedMS-TC (Main Street

Mixed Use)U (Undeveloped)




T-C (Town Center) District YOther Plans or Special Requirements Compliance

Trails Y




LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Being a portion of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section

20, Township 19 South, Range 60 East, M.D.M., City of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada more particularly described as follows:

Being Lot 4 of Montecito Town Center South, A Commercial Subdivision, as shown by mapthereof on file in Book 113, of Plats Page 38 in the office of the County Recorder’s Office, ClarkCounty, Nevada.



VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR



Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the City of Las Vegas, a municipal corporation, byGrant Deed recorded November 16, 2006, in Book 20061116, as Document No. 05116, of

Official Records.

Together with a portion of Lot Two (2), Certificate of Land Division 62-80 recorded May 21,1980 in Book 1230 as Instrument No. 1189729, of Official Records.

Excepting therefrom the north 30 feet, the east 50 feet and a spandrel area in the northeast corneras conveyed to Clark County by Deed Recorded May 21, 1980, in Book 1230, of OfficialRecords, as Document No. 1189727 of Official Records.

Further excepting therefrom that portion of said Lot Two (2) that portion conveyed to the Countyof Clark, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, for a portion of the Northern/Western

Segment of the Las Vegas Beltway in a Deed recorded January 29, 1998 in Book 980129 asInstrument No. 02109, Official Records.

Together with those portions as vacated by those certain order of vacations recorded February10, 2004 in Book 20040210 as Document No. 00608, and recorded March 26, 2004 in Book20040326 as Document No. 01023 of Official Records.

Together with the East Half (E 1/2) of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter(SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 20, Township 19 South, Range 60 East, ofM.D.M., Containing 13.87 acres of land.

ANALYSIS

The existing public drainage easements are no longer needed in their current configuration, asnew ones will be dedicated once the construction of an 186,300 square foot, six-story office building and 41,377 square-foot parking structure is complete.

Public works has noted that this Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities; however, asno right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is notnecessary to wait for responses from any of the public utilities.


The existing easements are in conflict with the existing six-story office building and parkingstructure and the proposed parking lot to the south. New drainage patterns have been created forthis site and existing easements no are longer needed. For these reasons, staff recommendsapproval of the requested Petition to Vacate.



VAC-59466 [PRJ-59203]

MR




NOTICES MAILED 4

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘ

VAC-59466



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱธｘ

VAC-59466



ｘ ″ ゜ㄦ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ธ ｘ

V A C - 5 9 4 6 6



㈎ㄦㄦｘ″ Ɔ㈠ ਙผ

AऑŴ㌱γ

ŐਙŴ₡ⓒ Ɔħ ں

ｘ㈎㈎ ՁŴ Ћ

ف

Ŵⓒ Ќ ٹ

Ŵ₡Ŵ ㈎ฎɱ ں

ㅡฎ ㈎㈎ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

ӧՙｘธỏ ฎธ ธㄦՙ ㈎ Ŵゥ ӧՙｘธỏ ɱ ɱｘｘ㈎

㈎ ʉʉʉ㈠₡ħŴこਙ₡⇡Ŵ㌱кŴ₡ผ ٹ

ħ ف

㈠㌱ਙこ㈎

İḶԱ ㅡｘㅡㄦ

ОAḚǲ Ḷ ธ

ҜŴ ⓒ ธｘㄦ

ǲṲĠ●Ա●╗ ਫA㈚

Ա ħ Ŵ ऑਙผ שħਙ ਙ⑾ γ Ɔਙ שγ Ŵ ש ỢŴผ ש ผ ӧƆǲ ゜ㅡỏ ਙ⑾ γ Ɔਙ שγ Ŵ ש ỢŴผ ש ผ ӧƆǲ ゜ㅡỏ ਙ⑾Ɔ

㌱ ש

ħਙ ธｘⓒ ╗ਙʉγħऑں

ɱ Ɔਙ ש

γⓒ ŐŴ

″ｘ ǲŴ ש

ⓒ Ҝ㈠Ｃ㈠Ҝ㈠ ⓒ ħ ש

ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵⓒ кŴผਙ שⓒ Ќ ٹŴ₡Ŵ こਙผ ऑŴผ שħ㌱кŴผк ₡ ㌱ผħ⇡ ₡ Ŵ ⑾ਙккਙʉ

Ա ħ Ձਙ ש ㅡ ਙ⑾ Ҝਙ ש ㌱ħ שਙ ╗ਙʉ ש ผ Ɔਙ שγⓒ A ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк Ɔ⇡₡ħ ٹħħਙⓒ Ŵ γਙʉ ⇡こŴऑ γ

ผ

ਙ⑾ ਙ ⑾ħк

ħ Աਙਙں

ⓒ ਙ⑾ ОкŴ ש

ОŴ

ฎ ħ γ

ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱

ਙ⑾ γ

㌱ਙ ש

ผ

㌱ਙผ₡

ผ ɸਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱

ⓒ кŴผ ਙ ש

ⓒ Ќٹ

Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠

ǲゥ㌱

ऑש

ħ ש

γ

ผ

⑾ผਙこש

γŴ ש

ऑਙผ ש

ħਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ

₡ש

ਙש

γ

ħ ש

Ḷ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵⓒ Ŵ こħ㌱ħऑŴк

㌱ਙผऑਙผŴ שħਙⓒ ⇡ ḚผŴ ש Ｃ ₡ ผ ㌱ਙผ₡ ₡ Ќਙ ٹ こ⇡ ผ ں ″ⓒ ธｘｘ″ⓒ ħ Աਙਙ ธｘｘ″ں ں ں ″ⓒ ŴＣਙ㌱こ

ש

Ќਙ㈠ｘㄦ ں ں

″ⓒ ਙ⑾ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ħŴк Ő

㌱ਙผ₡㈠

╗ਙ ש

γ

ผ ʉħ ש

γ Ŵ ऑਙผ ש

ħਙ ਙ⑾ Ձਙ ש

╗ʉਙ ӧธỏ

ผ ש

ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ ש

ਙ⑾ ՁŴ₡ Ｃħ ٹ

ħħਙ ″ธ ฎｘ ผ

㌱ਙผ₡

₡ ҜŴธ ں ⓒ ɱฎｘ ħ Աਙਙ ธ ｘ Ŵ ● שผこ ש Ќਙ㈠ ں ฎɱՙธɱⓒ ਙ⑾ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħ Ŵк Ő ㌱ਙผ₡㈠

ǲゥ㌱ ऑשħ γ ผ ⑾ผਙこ γ ਙผ שγ ｘ ⑾ ⊿ γש Ŵ ש ㄦｘ ⑾ Ŵ₡ Ŵ ऑŴ₡ผ к Ŵผ Ŵ ħ γש ਙผ שγ Ŵ ש ㌱ਙผ

ผ Ŵ ㌱ਙ ٹ

₡ ਙ кŴผ ਙ ש

⇡ Ｃ

₡ Ő

㌱ਙผ₡

₡ ҜŴ ธ ں

ⓒ ɱฎｘⓒ ħ Աਙਙ ธｘⓒ ਙ⑾Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ħŴк Ő ㌱ਙผ₡ⓒ Ŵ Ｃਙ㌱こ ש Ќਙ㈠ ں ฎɱՙธՙ ਙ⑾ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк Ő ㌱ਙผ₡㈠

ผ ש

γ

ผ ゥ㌱

ऑש

ħ

γ

ผ

⑾ผਙこ γŴ ש

ऑਙผ ש

ħਙ ਙ⑾ Ŵħ₡ Ձਙ ש

╗ʉਙ ӧธỏ γŴ ש

ऑਙผ ש

ħਙ ㌱ਙ ٹ

₡ ਙ γ

ਙ ש ਙ⑾ кŴผⓒ Ŵ ऑਙкħ שħ㌱Ŵк ⇡₡ħ ٹħħ ਙ ਙ⑾ γש Ɔ שŴ ש ਙ⑾ Ќ ٹŴ₡Ŵⓒ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ ऑਙผ שħਙ ਙ⑾ γש Ќਙผ

ש

γ

ผ゜Û

ש

ผ Ɔ

こ

ש

ਙ⑾ש

γ

ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵ Ա

к ש

ʉŴ ħ Ŵ Ｃ

₡ ผ

㌱ਙผ₡

₡ İŴŴผ ธɱⓒں ɱɱฎ ħ Աਙਙ ɱฎｘ ں ธɱ Ŵ ● שผこ ש Ќਙ㈠ｘธ ں ｘɱⓒ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħ Ŵк Ő ㌱ਙผ₡㈠

╗ਙ γש γ ผ ʉħש ħਙ Ŵש γਙ ऑਙผש ש Ŵ㌱Ŵٹ ₡ ⇡ γਙש ㌱ ผ שŴħ ਙผ₡ ผ ਙ⑾ ₡ ₡ħਙ ผ ㌱ਙผש Ŵ㌱Ŵٹ

⇡ผŴผ ｘⓒ ธｘｘㅡ ħ Աਙਙ ธｘｘㅡｘธ ں

ｘ Ŵ Ｃਙ㌱こ

ש

Ќਙ㈠ｘｘ″ｘฎ ⓒ Ŵ₡ ผ

㌱ਙผ₡

₡ ҜŴผ㌱γ ธ″ⓒธｘｘㅡ ħ Աਙਙ ธｘｘㅡｘธ ″ Ŵ Ｃਙ㌱こ ש Ќਙ㈠ｘ ں ｘธ ਙ⑾ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ ħŴк Ő ㌱ਙผ₡㈠

╗ਙ γ γש γ ผ ʉħש ǲŴ ש ĠŴк⑾ ӧǲ ゜ธỏ ਙ⑾ γ Ќਙผ שγʉ ש ỢŴผ ש ผ ӧЌÛ ゜ㅡỏ ਙ⑾ γ Ɔਙ שγ Ŵ ש ỢŴผ

ש

ผ ӧƆǲ ゜ㅡỏ ਙ⑾ γ

Ɔਙ ש

γ

Ŵ ש

ỢŴผ ש

ผ ӧƆǲ ゜ㅡỏ

ਙ שŴħħ ㈠ ฎՙ Ŵ㌱ผ ਙ⑾ кŴ₡㈠

ٹ ں

ゥ ӧ ｘ ธỏ ɱ ɱｘｘ㌱ Ŵ ₡ผ

ٹ

ف

㈠㌱ਙこ㈎

ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘVAC-59466



ｘ″゜

ՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘ

VAC-59466



V A C - 5 9 4 6 6 [ P R J - 5

9 2 0 3 ] - V A C A T I O N - A P P

L I C A N T / O W N E R : W A I T T - M O N T E C I T O R E A L E S T

A T E , L L C

S O U T H O F R O M E

B O U L E V A R D A N D W E S T

O F G R A N D M O N T E C I T O

P A R K W A Y

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱธｘ

VAC-59466







SUBJECT:VAC-59470 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING -OWNER: THM ENTERPRISES, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacatea 15-foot wide public drainage easement located at 8530 West Alexander Road (APN 138-05-801-064), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59435]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:






VAC-59470 [PRJ-59435]

GK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING - OWNER: THM

ENTERPRISES, INC.


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL


** CONDITIONS **


1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be defined as the 15-foot public undergrounddrainage easement as shown on recorded document 20081202:04978.


3. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of publicimprovements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient securityfor the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City ofLas Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because oftechnical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current Cityright-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation applicationis not changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and firehydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridorsthat will remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where

needed, public easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/shouldcross any right-of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.





VAC-59470 [PRJ-59435]

GK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to vacate a 15-foot wide public drainage easement on propertylocated at 8530 West Alexander Road. Currently, the subject site is undeveloped and wasannexed into the city of Las Vegas on 02/24/15. This drainage easement was granted by a previous developer when the property was located in Clark County. The property has since beensold and annexed and the drainage easement is no longer required. The applicant has submitted arequest for a Final Map (FMP-58234) for a nine-lot residential subdivision, which is currentlyunder review by staff. The existing 15-foot wide public drainage easement will not be utilized forthe proposed residential development. As this drainage easement is no longer needed in this

current configuration, staff recommends approval. If denied, the existing public drainageeasement would remain.



02/18/15The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-57016) 4.7 acres on thenorth side of West Alexander, 630 feet west of Durango Drive. Theannexation was recorded on 02/24/15.

03/23/15

Staff administratively approved a Final Map (FMP-58234) for a nine-lot

single family residential subdivision on 4.7 acres on the north side ofAlexander Road, approximately 630 feet west of Durango Drive. The finalmap has not been recorded.




09/09/18There are no related building permits or business licenses on file for thesubject site.


05/26/15

Staff met with the representative to discuss a proposed request to vacate a public drainage easement. Staff concluded that a Vacation application would be required. The submittal requirements for a Vacation application werediscussed.



VAC-59470 [PRJ-59435]

GK





Field Check

06/04/15Staff conducted a routine field check and noted an undeveloped site free oftrash or debris.


Site Area

Gross Acres 4.75

Surrounding Property

Existing Land Use Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special Land Use Designation



RNP (Rural NeighborhoodPreservation)

R-D (Single FamilyResidential-Restricted)

R (Rural DensityResidential)

North UndevelopedRL (Residential Low –

Clark County)

R-E (Rural EstatesResidential – Clark

County)

SouthSingle-Family

ResidencesL (Low Density


Residential)

East UndevelopedRL (Residential Low –

Clark County)


County)

West UndevelopedRL (Residential Low –

Clark County)


County)






Trails N/A






VAC-59470 [PRJ-59435]

GK



LEGAL DESCRIPTION

The purpose is to vacate the public underground drainage easement as shown on the certaindocument recorded December 2, 2008 in book 20081202, as instrument no. 04978 of officialrecords.

Being a portion of the east half (E 1/2) of the southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the southeast quarter(SE 1/4) of the southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 5, Township 20 South, Range 60 East,M.D.M., Clark County, Nevada, described as follows:

Commencing at the southwest corner of the southwest corner of the southwest quarter (SW 1/4)of the southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of the southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 5; thence along thesouth line thereof north 89°40'45" east, 342.26 feet to the southwest corner of said east half (E

1/2) of the southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of the southeast quarter(SE 1/4) of Section 5; thence along the west line thereof north 00°01'18" west, 331.14 feet;thence continuing along said west line north 00°00'42" west, 331.01 feet to the northwest cornerof said east half (E 1/2) of the southwest quarter (SW 1/4) of the southeast quarter (SE 1/4) of thesoutheast quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 5; thence along the north line thereof north 89°36'48" east,144.02 feet to the point of beginning; thence north 89°37'11" east, 105.00 feet; thence south45°10'35" east,21.15 feet; thence south 89°37'20" west, 119.90 feet; thence north 00°22'40" west,15.00 feet to the point of beginning.

Said parcel contains 1,687 square feet, more or less.

ANALYSIS

This application request proposes that the City of Las Vegas relinquish its interest in a 15-footwide public drainage easement associated with assessor’s Parcel Number 138-05-801-064,located at 8530 West Alexander Road. Currently, the subject site is undeveloped and wasannexed into the city of Las Vegas on 02/24/15. This drainage easement was granted by a previous developer when the property was located in Clark County. The property has since been sold and annexed and the drainage easement is no longer required. The applicant hassubmitted a request for a Final Map (FMP-58234) for a nine-lot residential subdivision, whichis currently under review by staff. The existing 15-foot wide public drainage easement will

not be utilized for the proposed residential development. The drainage for the site has changedand is no longer required for the proposed residential subdivision. As no right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to sendthis VAC request to the utility companies and franchise holders, nor wait for their responses.Since only City easements are involved; any utility company interests will not be affected.



VAC-59470 [PRJ-59435]

GK




The Department of Public Works has no objection to the vacation application request to vacate the public drainage easement located at 8530 West Alexander Road. This Vacation request should besent to all the utilities however, as no right of way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchiserights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for responses from any of the public utilities. Stafftherefore recommends approval with conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 2

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡㄦ

VAC-59470



Ṳ Ġ ●Ա ●╗Aฌ

Ձ Ḛ A ՁＣ Ɔ Ő ●О ╗●Ḷ Ќ ฌ

ฎ ｘㄦ ฎｘｘ″ㅡฌ

╗Ġ Ҝ Ќ ╗ Ő О Ő ●Ɔ Ɔ ⓒՁՁ ฌ

╗ Ġ О Ⓢ Ő О Ḷ Ɔ ●Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ћ A A ╗ ╗ Ġ О Ⓢ Ա Ձ ● Ⓢ Ќ Ｃ Ő Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ ＣＣ Ő A ●Ќ A Ḛ A Ɔ Ҝ Ќ ╗A Ɔ Ɔ Ġ Ḷ Û Ќ ฌ

Ḷ Ќ╗Ġ Ő ╗A ●ЌＣ Ḷ Ⓢ Ҝ Ќ ╗Ő Ḷ Ő ＣＣＣ Ҝ Ա Őธⓒธｘｘฎ●ЌԱḶ Ḷ ธｘｘฎ ธｘ ธⓒA Ɔฌ

●Ќ Ɔ ╗Ő Ⓢ Ҝ Ќ ╗Ќ Ḷ ㈠ｘㅡɱՙฎḶ Ḷ ● ●A ՁŐ Ḷ Ő Ｃ Ɔ㈠ฌ

Ա ●Ќ Ḛ AО Ḷ Ő ╗●Ḷ Ќ Ḷ ╗ Ġ A Ɔ╗Ġ A Ձӧ ธỏḶ ╗ Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Û Ɔ ╗ Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ Ő ӧƆ Û ỏḶ ╗Ġ ฌ

Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ A Ɔ ╗ Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ Ő ӧƆ

ỏ

Ḷ ╗Ġ ƆḶ Ⓢ ╗Ġ AƆ ╗Ợ Ⓢ AŐ ╗ Ő ӧƆ ħỏḶ Ɔ ╗●Ḷ Ќㄦⓒ╗Ḷ Û Ќ Ɔ Ġ ●Оฌ

ธｘƆ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗Ġ ⓒŐ A Ќ Ḛ ″ｘ AƆ ╗ⓒҜ ㈠Ｃ㈠Ҝ ㈠ⓒ ՁA Ő Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ ╗ ⓒЌ Ћ A Ｃ A ⓒＣ Ɔ Ő ●Ա Ｃ A ƆḶ ՁՁḶ Û Ɔฌ

Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ A ╗ ╗ Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Û Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő Ќ Ő Ḷ ╗ Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Û Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő Ќ Ő Ḷ ╗ Ġ ฌ

Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Û Ɔ ╗Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ Ő ӧƆ Û ƥAỏḶ ╗Ġ ƆḶ Ⓢ ╗Ġ AƆ ╗Ợ Ⓢ AŐ ╗ Ő ӧƆ ỏḶ ╗Ġ ƆḶ Ⓢ ╗Ġ AƆ ╗ฌ

Ợ Ⓢ AŐ ╗ ŐӧƆ ħỏḶ Ɔ ╗●Ḷ Ќㄦ⊿╗Ġ Ќ A ՁḶ Ќ Ḛ╗Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗Ġ Ձ●Ќ ╗Ġ Ő Ḷ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġฎɱ¤ㅡｘƥㅡㄦफฌ

A Ɔ╗ ⓒㅡธ㈠ธ″ ╗╗Ḷ ╗ Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗Ġ Û Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő Ќ Ő Ḷ Ɔ A ●Ｃ AƆ ╗Ġ A Ձӧ ธỏḶ ╗ Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ Û Ɔ ╗ ฌ

Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ Ő ӧƆ Û ħỏḶ ╗Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗Ġ AƆ ╗Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ Ő ӧƆ ħỏḶ ╗Ġ ƆḶ Ⓢ ╗Ġ AƆ ╗Ợ Ⓢ AŐ ╗ Ő ӧƆ

ƥAỏฌ

Ḷ Ɔ ╗●Ḷ Ќㄦ⊿╗Ġ Ќ A ՁḶ Ќ Ḛ╗Ġ Û Ɔ ╗Ձ●Ќ ╗Ġ Ő Ḷ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗Ġ ｘｘ¤ｘ╗ ฎफÛ Ɔ ╗ⓒ ㈠ ㅡ ╗⊿ฌ

╗Ġ Ќ Ḷ Ќ ╗●Ќ Ⓢ ●Ќ ḚAՁḶ Ќ ḚƆ A ●Ｃ Û Ɔ ╗Ձ●Ќ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġｘｘ¤ｘｘƥㅡธफÛ Ɔ╗ⓒ ㈠ｘ ╗╗ Ḷ ╗ Ġ ฌ

Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġ Û Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő Ќ Ő Ḷ Ɔ A ●Ｃ A Ɔ ╗ Ġ A Ձ ӧ ธỏḶ ╗Ġ ƆḶ Ⓢ ╗Ġ Û Ɔ╗Ợ Ⓢ AŐ ╗ ŐӧƆÛ ㅡỏḶ ฌ

╗ Ġ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ A Ɔ ╗ Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ Ő ӧƆ ㏂ ỏ Ḷ ╗Ġ ƆḶ Ⓢ ╗Ġ AƆ ╗Ợ Ⓢ AŐ ╗ ŐӧƆ ħỏḶ Ɔ ╗●Ḷ Ќ ㄦ⊿╗ Ġ Ќ ฌ

A ՁḶ Ќ Ḛ╗Ġ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ ĠՁ●Ќ ╗Ġ Ő Ḷ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġฎɱ¤″ƥㅡฎफ AƆ ╗ⓒ ㅡㅡ㈠ｘธ ╗╗ Ḷ ╗ Ġ О Ḷ ●Ќ ╗Ḷ ฌ

Ա Ḛ ●Ќ Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ ⊿╗Ġ Ќ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗Ġ ฎɱ ¤ՙƥ फ A Ɔ ╗ⓒ ｘㄦ㈠ｘｘ ╗⊿╗ Ġ Ќ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ ㅡㄦ¤ ｘƥㄦफ A Ɔ ╗ⓒ ธ ㈠ㄦฌ

╗⊿╗ Ġ Ќ Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ ฎɱ¤ՙƥธｘफÛ Ɔ ╗ⓒ ɱ㈠ɱｘ ╗⊿╗ Ġ Ќ Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġ ｘｘ¤ธธƥㅡｘफÛ Ɔ ╗ⓒ ㄦ㈠ｘｘ ╗ฌ

╗Ḷ ╗Ġ О Ḷ ●Ќ ╗Ḷ Ա Ḛ ●Ќ Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ ㈠ฌ

Ɔ A ●Ｃ О A Ő Ձ Ḷ Ќ ╗ A ●Ќ Ɔ ⓒ″ฎՙƆ Ợ Ⓢ A Ő ╗ⓒҜ Ḷ Ő Ḷ Ő Ձ Ɔ Ɔ ㈠ฌ

О Ⓢ Ő О Ḷ Ɔ

О Ⓢ Ա Ձ● Ⓢ Ќ Ｃ Ő Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ ＣＣ Ő A ●Ќ A Ḛ ฌ

A Ɔ Ҝ Ќ ╗ Ћ A A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ฌ

О Ő О A Ő Ｃ

Ա

Ɔ╗ Ћ ЌҜ ㈠Ｃ Ⓢ Ҝ Ḷ Ћ● Ġ ⓒОՁƆฌ

″ｘｘƆḶ ㈠İḶ Ќ ƆԱ ՁЋ Ｃ㈠ｘｘฌ

ՁAƆЋ Ḛ AƆ ⓒЌ Ћ A Ｃ Aฎɱ ฎฌ

İḶ Ա Ќ A Ҝ A Ձ Ṳ A Ќ Ｃ Ő Ｃ Ⓢ Ő A Ќ Ḛ Ḷ ฌ

İḶ Ա Ќ Ⓢ Ҝ Ա Ő

╗Ġ Ҝ ｘｘธฌ

Ḛ Ḷ Ћ Ő Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ

Ќ ╗●╗ ฌ

Ձ A Ő Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ ╗ ⓒЌ Ћ A Ｃ Aฌ

●Ձ Ќ A Ҝ

Ⓢ Ḛ Ｃ Ћ A A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ㈠Ｃ Ḷ ฌ

ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱㅡㄦ

VAC-59470



ฎ ｘㄦ ฎｘｘ″ㅡฌ

╗ĠҜ ǲЌ╗ǲŐОŐ●ƆǲƆⓒ ՁՁ

Ќ Ḷ Ő Ġฌ

AՁǲ ผएںｘｘɸฌ

Ќ ฎɱɸㅡｘㅡㄦ ǲ ฌ

О㈠Ḷ㈠㈠

ㅡธ㈠ธ″

Ҝ ผฌ

㈠ธ″ɸ

Ћ ฌ

ǲṲĠ●Ա● Ա ㈠ฌ

Ќ ฎɱɸ ɸ ɸɸǲฌںں

О㈠Ḷ㈠Ա㈠㏂ｘㄦ㈠ｘｘ

Ќ ฎɱɸ″ɸㅡฎɸɸǲฌ

ฌ

ｘｘฌ

ㄦ

ㄦฌ

⇓ฌ

ㅡㅡ㈠ｘธɸฌں

Ќ ｘｘɸธธɸㅡｘɸ㏂Û

ㄦ㈠ｘｘɸฌں

ㅡㄦɸںｘɸㄦɸɸǲฌ

ฎɱɸ ɸธｘɸɸÛ ฌ

ɱ㈠ɱｘɸฌںں

О╗ ǲ ㏂ Ḷ ╗Ġ ǲ ƆÛ ● Ḷ ╗Ġǲฌ

Ɔǲ

●

Ḷ ╗Ġǲ Ɔǲ ⇓ Ɔǲㄦⓒฌ

╗ ｘ Ɔⓒ Ő ″ｘ ǲ㈠ Ҝ㈠Ｃ㈠Ҝ㈠ฌ

AՁǲṲAЌ ＣǲŐ Ő Ḷ AＣ ฌ

ฌ

⇓ฌ

ОⓈ ԱՁ● Ⓢ ЌＣ ǲŐ Ḛ ŐḶ Ⓢ ЌＣ ฌ

ＣŐ A●Ќ AḚ ǲ ǲA ǲҜ ǲЌ ฌ

ЋAA ●Ḷ Ќ ǲṲĠ●Ա● ฌ

╗AЌ

Ќ Ḛ ●Ќ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ

″ｘｘƆ ㈠İḶ Ќ Ɔ Ա ՁЋ Ｃ㈠ⓒƆ╗ ㈠кḶ Ḷ ฌ

ՁAƆЋ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒЌ Ћ A Ｃ Aฎɱ ฎฌ

ӧՙｘธỏ″ธ ฎฎㅡ ㅡ A Ṳӧ ｘธỏ″ธ ㄦธฌ

ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱㅡㄦ

VAC-59470



V A C - 5 9 4 7 0

[ P R J - 5 9 4 3 5 ] -

V A C A T I O N

- A P P L I C A N T :

T O U C H S

T O N E

L I V I N G

-

O W

N E R :

T H M

E N T E R P R I S E S , I N

C .

8 5 3 0 W E S T A L E X A

N D E R R O A D

0 6 / 1 8 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡㄦVAC-59470







SUBJECT:VAC-59471 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DURANGO 95MINI STORAGE PARTNERS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a20-foot wide public drainage easement generally located east and south of the intersection ofFarm Road and Oso Blanca Road, Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59302]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.






RECOMMENDATION:






VAC-59471 [PRJ-59302]

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DURANGO 95 MINI STORAGE

PARTNERS, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAC-59471 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: N/A

** CONDITIONS **


1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the Public Drainage Easement granted overa portion of Parcel One that was recorded in File 119, Page 67 of Parcel Maps.

2. A new Public Drainage Easement that replaces the current Public Drainage Easement mustrecord immediately after the recordation of this Order of Vacation.



5. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring modification of public improvementsmay be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the

performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of LasVegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because oftechnical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is notchanged. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that willremain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, publiceasement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross anyright-of-way being vacated must be retained



VAC-59471 [PRJ-59302]

MR

Conditions Page Two


6. If the Order of Vacation is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City ofLas Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval

will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.



VAC-59471 [PRJ-59302]

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to vacate a 20-foot wide public drainage easement generally locatedeast and south of the intersection of Farm Road and Oso Blanca Road. The development plansfor the site have changed, which caused the redesign of the drainage onsite, resulting in the needto remove the pre-existing drainage easement. As this drainage easement is no longer needed inthe current configuration, staff recommends approval. If denied, the existing drainage easementwould remain.

ISSUES

This request to vacation is consistent with the approved Site Development Plan Review(SDR-52440) for a three-story 122,325 square-foot Mini-Storage Facility.



12/07/98

The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0076-98) of 1,468 acres to the T-C(Town Center) zoning district. The subject site was included in this Rezoning

request. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of thisrequest.

09/07/05

The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification (MOD-7588)of the Town Center Development Standards Manual from SC-TC (ServiceCommercial- Town Center) to SX-TC (Suburban Mixed Use-Town Center)and GC-TC (General Commercial) Special Land use Designations on 40acres at the intersection of Oso Blanca Road and Severence Lane. ThePlanning Commission and staff recommended approval.

02/11/14

The Planning Commission approved requests for a Site Development PlanReview (SDR-52440) for a three-story, 122,325 square-foot Mini-StorageFacility with Waivers of the Town Center Development Standards to allow

10% Open Space where 20 % Open Space is required, a Special Use Permit(SUP-52437) for a Min-Storage Facility use with a Waiver of the requirementto provide a retail or office facade on all exterior walls and a Special UsePermit (SUP-52438) for a Truck Rental use with a Waiver to allow a 130-footdistance separation from a single-family detached dwelling where 330 feet isrequired at the southeast corner of Farm Road and Oso Blanca Road. Staffrecommended approval of the three requests.



VAC-59471 [PRJ-59302]

MR






12/17/14Civil Improvement Plans (L-Civil-57262) were applied for; howerver havenot been issued as of 05/13/15.


05/14/15A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant’s designedrepresentative and discussed the submittal requirements to vacate the publicdrainage easement associate with the subject property.



Field Check

06/04/15A field check was conducted of the subject site, which revealed that the site isan undeveloped dirt lot.


Site Area Net Acres 2.9

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Subject Property UndevelopedGC-TC (General

Commercial – TownCenter Land Use)

North North UndevelopedGC-TC (General

Commercial – Town

Center Land Use)

South UndevelopedGC-TC (General

Commercial – TownCenter Land Use)

T-C (Town Center)

East Freeway Right of Way Right of Way

WestMulti-FamilyResidential

SX-TC (SuburbanMixed-Use – TownCenter Land Use)

T-C (Town Center)



VAC-59471 [PRJ-59302]

MR




Town Center Master Plan Y Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance



Trails N/A




LEGAL DESCRIPTION

Being a 20-foot wide public drainage easement within a portion of parcel I of parcel map in File119, Page 67 of Parcel Maps, Official Records, Clark County, Nevada. Situate in the NortheastQuarter (NE 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 114) of Section 17, Township 19 South, Range60 East, M.D.M. City Of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada described as follows. Commencingat the northwest corner of parcel 1 as shown on Parcel Map In File 119, Page 67 Of Parcel Maps,Official Records, Clark County, Nevada.

The easement contains 9,475 square feet, more or less.

ANALYSIS

The existing public drainage easement is no longer needed in the current configuration, as a newone will be dedicated with the construction of the 122,325 Mini-Storage Facility.

Public Works has noted that this Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities; however,as no right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it isnot necessary to wait for responses from any of the public utilities. Additionally, areplacement drainage easement has already been submitted to the City and we will not recordthe new easement until after this vacation records.


The existing easement is in conflict with the proposed Mini-Storage facility and is not needed inthe current configuration. A new drainage easement was submitted to accommodate the new siteconfiguration. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the requested Petition to Vacate.



VAC-59471 [PRJ-59302]

MR




NOTICES MAILED 2

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘธ

VAC-59471



Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ Ќこ⇡ ผ ОŐİ ㄦɱ ｘธ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ゜О ħ ħਙ ਙผ ЋŴ㌱Ŵ ħਙ ਙ⑾ О⇡кħ㌱ＣผŴħŴ ǲŴ こ

Оผਙ ㈾㌱ A₡₡ผ ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙỏ Ḛ ǲЌǲŐAՁՁ ՁḶ A ╗ǲＣ ǲ AƆ╗ AЌＣ ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ Ḷ ╗Ġǲ ●Ќ ╗ǲŐƆ●ḶЌ AŐҜ ŐḶ AＣ AЌＣ ḶƆḶ ԱՁAЌ A ŐḶ AＣ

Оผਙ ㈾

㌱

ЌŴこ

Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ ḶЌǲ A ╗ ㅡ

ḶƆḶ ԱՁAЌ A


ธㄦ ՙ ｘｘ

ÛŴผ₡ ÛAŐＣ ″ ӧƆ╗ǲЋǲЌ Ｃ㈠ ŐḶƆƆỏ


ਙผผ ㌱

⑾ ਙⓒ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴ ʉγŴ

Ḛ

ผŴк ОкŴ Ｃ

ħ

Ŵ

ħਙ Оผਙऑਙ

₡ Ɔ

к

㌱

Ύਙħ Ｃħ ผħ㌱ Оผਙऑਙ ₡ Ɔ к ㌱

Ḛผਙ A㌱ผ

Ձਙ

Ⓢħ


Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħผ ЌŴこ İAҜǲƆ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Ġ AҜҜǲŐ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ A₡₡ผ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ɔ Ŵ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ύħऑ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Оγਙ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ŵゥ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ǲこŴħк

㈾ħこγŴここ ผ㌀㌱ਙゥ㈠

Ő ऑ ħผ ЌŴこ ḶՁՁǲǲЌ

Ő ऑ ՁŴ ЌŴこ Ḛ ḶḶＣ

Ő ऑ A₡₡ผ

Ő

ऑ ħ

Ő ऑ Ɔ Ŵ

Ő

ऑ Ύħऑ

Ő ऑ Оγਙ ՙｘธ ՙ ɱ ㅡฎฎ″

Ő ऑ Ŵゥ

Ő ऑ ǲこŴħк ㌱Ŵ ㌀㌱ħٹħкʉਙผਙкħ ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ㄦ゜ธں ธｘ ںㄦ ธธｘ ОҜںں


ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘธ

VAC-59471






ਙ γ ⇡ ਙ⑾ こ ਙʉк ₡ Ŵ₡

⇡ кħ ⑾㈠ ● ₡ ผ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ ħ








Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙⓒ ਙผ γ к ਙผ Ŵ



A㌱㌱ ऑ


⑾ ਙⓒ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴ

ʉγŴ

Ḷʉ ผӧỏ AＣＣŐں AＣＣŐธＣⓈŐAЌḚḶ ɱㄦҜ●Ќ● Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ

О╗ЌŐƆ Ձ

ธɱɱｘ Ɔ ＣⓈŐAЌḚḶ ＣŐ ՁAƆ ЋǲḚAƆⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎɱ ՙ


Ő

Ŵผк

ħ

ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵ Ɔผ ╗

㌱γħ㌱Ŵк Ɔ

こ AŴк

ผ㌱Ŵผк

㌀кŴ ٹ

Ŵٹ

Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠

ਙٹ

ਙкк Ḛਙਙ₡ ħٹħкʉਙผ ՁŴ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ ਙਙผ₡ħŴ ਙผ ㌱Ŵ ㌀㌱ħٹħкʉਙผਙкħ ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ธ ਙㄦ゜ธ ธｘ ںㄦ ธธｘ ОҜںں


ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘธ

VAC-59471




О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ｘ ธ



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘธVAC-59471



V A C - 5 9 4 7 1 [ P R J - 5

9 3 0 2 ] - V A C A T I O N

- A P

P L I C A N T / O W N E R : D U R A

N G O

9 5 M I N I S T O R A G E

P A R T N E R S ,

L L C E A S T A N D S O U T H

O F T H E I N T E R S E C T I O N

O F F A R M

R O A D A N D O

S O B L A N C A R O A D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱｘธ

VAC-59471







SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - ZON-58533 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: PRECEDENTPROPERTIES, LLC - OWNER: MARK EVERETT THROWER - For possible action on arequest for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL) on 2.03 acres at the northwest corner of Deer Springs Way and ThomBoulevard (APN 125-24-602-017), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-58384]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Withdrawal Request2. Location and Aerial Maps

3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter6. Condition Confirmation Letter, Supplemental Staff Report, Protest Postcards, Protest Letterand Support Postcards



1

Nora Lares

Subject: FW: [Newsletter] RE: ZON-58533 PRJ-58384 / Deer Springs & Thom Rezoning

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]

Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 3:24 PMTo: Yorgo Kagafas

Subject: [Newsletter] RE: ZON-58533 PRJ-58384 / Deer Springs & Thom Rezoning

Goo afternoon Yorgo, After meeting with Mayor Pro Tem Steve Ross, it was highly recommended that we

remove this application unconditionally. Therefore, this email is notification to the city that this re zoningapplication to be removed from the agenda, cancelled unconditionally as per our request. Please let me

know if there is anything else we need to do to formally cancel this application. That for all your efforts onthis. Let me know if there are any questions and please confirm receipt of this email when

received. Thanks,

Levi Parker

LAS VEGAS INVESTMENTS & REALTY, Inc.3425 Cliff Shadows Parkway #130Las Vegas Nevada 89129702.331.2800 Office702.331.2801 Fax702.374.1519 [email protected]

www.InvestintoLasVegas.com

*** DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communicationcontains CONFIDENTIAL and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication inerror, please call us (collect) immediately at (702) 331-2800 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error. Thank you. Las VegasInvestments & Realty, Inc.***



ｘ゜ธㄦ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎฎㅡ



ƆⓈԱİǲ╗ОŐḶОǲŐ╗

╗ Ġ Ḷ Ҝ Ա Ձ Ћ Ｃ

Ⓢ Ќ ● Ḷ Ő Ќ

Ɔ ╗

Ձ A Ő

Ҝ ● Ɔ ╗ Ɔ ╗

Ɔ

A

Ҝ Ḷ Ő ǲ Ћ ● ǲ Û

Ɔ ╗

ԱՁⓈǲ ǲ ЋǲŐḚŐǲǲЌ A Ћǲ

Ġ A Ύ ǲ Ձ Ќ Ⓢ ╗ Ḛ A Ő Ｃ ǲ Ќ

Ɔ ╗

ǲ Ձ Ҝ Ġ ● Ձ Ձ ╗

ḶŐĠ AŐＣ Ɔ A Ћǲ

İ AŐŐǲ ╗ ╗ A Ћǲ

О Ő ǲ Ɔ Ɔ

О A Ő

╗

ǲЌḶŐǲ О AŐ AＣ●Ɔǲ A Ћǲ

О

Ő A A

Ќ ╗ Ġ A

Ḛ Ձ ǲ Ќ

╗

ОⓈŐОՁǲ ḶŐĠ●Ｃ ╗

Ҝǲ AＣḶ ÛƆ ǲЌḶŐǲ A Ћǲ

Ġ A Û A ● ● A

Ќ Ɔ ╗

Ա Ő A Ｃ Ձ ǲ

Ő Ｃ

Û ＣḶŐŐǲՁՁ ՁЌ

Û ＣǲǲŐ ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ Û A

ΎḶЌ

ㄦฎㄦ

㌫ŐḶҜ Ő ǲ ╗Ḷ Ő

ＣŴ ╗ ₡Ŵⓒ Aऑผħк ｘՙⓒ ธ ｘ

Ḛ●Ɔ こŴऑ Ŵผ

ਙผこŴкк ऑผਙ₡ਙк ਙ こ γ ₡ ਙ⑾ γ

Ｃ

ਙ ㌱ਙ

ħਙ ₡ ٹ

кਙऑこ

γħ こŴऑ ħ ⑾ਙผ ผ ⑾ ผ ㌱ ਙ

Ḛ ਙفผŴऑγħ㌱ ●⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ ƆОкŴħف Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこＣ

ՙｘธ ธธɱ ″ｘ ں

ħ

Ձħこħ

ں

ｘｘｘ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ

ผ

ਙħف Ő ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ ՁਙʉＣ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő Ҝ ₡ħこＣ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő ㅡ Ġħفγ Ｃ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő ҜĠ Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡Ġਙこ Ő ħ₡ ㌱

Ő ㄦ AऑŴผ こ

Ő ҜĠО Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ ОŴผ

О Ő Оผਙ⑾ ħਙŴк Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ Ŵ₡ ОŴผħف

О Ḷ Оผਙ⑾ ħਙŴк Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ќ Ɔ Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ Ɔ ผٹħ㌱

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

ＣＣ ħف ₡ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ں Ձħこħ ₡ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ธ Ḛ ผŴк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ОԱ ОкŴ ₡ Աħ ОŴผ

Ҝ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк゜●₡ ผħŴк

Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱

О ОкŴ ₡ ਙここħ

╗ Ｃ ╗ผŴ₡ħ ħਙŴк Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

ОＣ ОкŴ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ

Ő ǲ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк ǲ Ŵ

Ⓢ ӧḚОA Ｃ ħفŴ ħਙỏⓈ₡ ٹ кਙऑ ₡

Ő A ŐŴ㌱γ A㌱ผ

Ő Ｃ Ɔħف к ŴこħкŐ ħ₡ ħŴк Ő ผħ㌱ ₡

Ő ОＣ Ő ħ₡ ħŴкОкŴ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

Őں Ɔħفк ŴこħкŐ ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő Ձ Ɔħف к ŴこħкਙこऑŴ㌱

Ձਙ

A Ҝ

ǲ Ġ

О О ħ к ħ

Ќ Ќ ħفγ ผγਙ ผٹħ㌱

ħ

ħف ₡ ਙここ ħŴк

ں Ձħ ħ ₡ ħŴк

ผŴ к ここ ħŴк

ОԱ

ОкŴ ₡ Ա ħ ОŴ

Ҝ

ħ к

Ҝ

ผħŴк

Ћ

ħٹħ

О ОкŴ ₡ ਙこ

₡ħ ħ Ŵк ٹ

О ОкŴ ٹ кਙ

ｘㅡ゜ｘՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎฎㅡ

ZON-58533



SUBJECTPROPERTY

T H O M B

L V D

W ROME BL VD

U N I C O R N

S T

W H I T E H A L L C I R

BLACK CORAL A VE

L A

R K

M I S T S T

ANO DR

S Y C A M O R E V I E W S

TBLUE E VERGREEN A VE

MELLO A VE

H A Z E

L N U T G A R D E N S T

ELM HILL C T

S T

L U C I A

S T

ORCHARD SK Y A VE

C Y P R E S

S

P A R K

C T

ENCORE PARADISE A VE

W I L D

W A V E D R

PLAMA CT

PURPLE ORCHID C T

PALM TREE CT

HARMONIZE CT

B R A D L E Y

R D

W DORRELL LN

W DEER SPRINGS WA Y

RURAL PRESERVATION NEIGHBORHOOD MAP

±

Date: Monday, June 15, 2

GIS maps are n ormally prod

only to meet the needs of the

Due to continuous developmen

this map is for reference o

Geographic Information Sy

Planning & Development D

702-229-6301

ZoningR-2 - Medium-LowDensity Residential

R-3 - Medium DensityResidential

R-4 - High DensityResidential

R-MH - Mobile/ManufacturedHome Residence

R-5 - Apartment

R-MHP - Residential Mobile/Manufactured Home Park

P-R - Professional Officesand Parking

P-O - Professional Office

N-S - Neighborhood Service

O - Office

C-D - Designed Commercial

C-1 - Limited Commercial

C-2 - General Commercial

C-PB - Planned BusinessPark

C-M - Commercial/Industrial

M - Industrial

C-V - Civic

P-C - Planned Community

T-D - Traditional Development

PD - Planned Development

T-C - Town Center

R-E - Residential Estates

U - (GPA Designation)Undeveloped

R-A - Ranch Acres

R-D - Single-FamilyResidential-Restricted

R-PD - ResidentialPlanned Development

R-1 - Single FamilyResidential

R-CL - Single-FamilyCompact-Lot

City Limits

Subject Property

330 Foot Buffer

Rural PreservationNeighborhood

ZON-58533



Z O N - 5 8 5 3 3 [ P R J -

5 8 3 8 4 ] - R E Z O N I N G - A

P P L I C A N T : P R E C E D E N T

P R O P E R T I E S , L L C - O W

N E R : M A R K

E V E R E T T T H R O W E

R

N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R O F D E E R S P R I N G S W

A Y A N D T H O M

B O U L E V

A R D

0 4 / 0 2 / 1 5



ｘㅡ゜ธｘ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎฎㅡZON-58533 - REVISED







SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - SUP-59027 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:OPORTUN - OWNER: B.E. UNO, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special UsePermit FOR A PROPOSED 1,711 SQUARE-FOOT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION, SPECIFIEDUSE WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM ARESIDENTIAL USE WHERE 200 FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 112-FOOT DISTANCESEPARATION FROM AN EXISTING SIMILAR USE WHERE 1,000 FEET IS REQUIRED at568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A (APN 139-36-111-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58965]. Staff recommends DENIAL.





RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location, Aerial and Special Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report3. Supporting Documentation4. Photo(s)5. Justification Letter



SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: OPORTUN - OWNER: B.E. UNO, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

SUP-59027 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject toconditions:

N/A

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a FinancialInstitution, Specified use.


3. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance separationfrom a residential protected property where 200 feet is required and a 112-foot distanceseparation from a similar use where 1,000 feet is required.






SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a 1,711 square-foot FinancialInstitution, Specified use at 568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A. This application is accompanied by two distance separation Waiver requests. The first Waiver is to allow a zero-foot distanceseparation from a residential property, where 200 feet is the minimum required and the second isto allow a 112-foot separation distance from a similar use, where 1,000 feet is the minimumrequired by code. There are five similar uses within 1,000 feet of proposed location. In short, the proposed Financial Institution, Specified use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmoniousand compatible with the existing surrounding land uses, as illustrated by the requested distance

separation Waivers and the five existing Financial Institution, Specified uses within 1,000-footradius of the subject location. Staff recommends denial of the requested Special Use Permit.

ISSUES

The Financial Institution Specified Use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoningdistrict with approval of a Special Use Permit.

A Waiver is required to allow a distance separation of zero feet from a residential propertywhere 200 feet is the minimum required. Staff does not support this distance separationWaiver.

A Waiver is required to allow a distance separation of 112 feet from a similar use where1,000 feet is the minimum required. Staff does not support this distance separation Waiver.



06/16/76

The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for the Reclassificationof property and Plot Plan Review (Z-0061-75) from R-E (Residence Estates)to C-1 (Limited Commercial) with the proposed use of a NeighborhoodShopping Center on a property located southeast of Bonanza Road and

Eastern Avenue extending south along Eastern Avenue and east alongBonanza Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval.

06/01/77

The Board of City Commissioners approved an Extension of Time request (Z-0061-75) for the Rezoning from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (LimitedCommercial) and Plot Plan Review for a Neighborhood Shopping Center forthe property located southeast of Bonanza Road and Eastern Avenue. ThePlanning Commission recommended approval.



SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR




11/30/77

The Board of City Commissioners approved an Extension of Time request, a

Revised Plot Plan Review, Tentative Map and Final Map (Z-0061-75) for a Neighborhood Shopping Center that is a commercial condominiumdevelopment located on the southeast corner of Eastern Avenue and BonanzaRoad. The Planning Commission recommended approval.

01/06/78A Final Map (Book 21 Page 26 of Plats) for the Bonanza East CondominiumCommercial Subdivision was recorded. This created Lot 5, for which thedistance separation for this application is measured.

06/09/15The Planning Commission voted to hold this item in abeyance to the 07/14/15Planning Commission meeting at the request of the applicant.

Most Recent Change of Ownership06/26/03 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.


1970’s The shopping center was constructed.

09/10/02A building permit (#2016321) was issued for a tenant improvement at 568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A. The permit expired on 03/15/03.

03/01/01A business license (N02-00045) was issued for a Non-Depository Lender at556 North Eastern Avenue, Suite D. The license is active as of 05/12/15.

10/24/03A business license (N02-00064) was issued for a Non-Depository Lender at550 North Eastern Avenue. The license is active as of 05/12/15.

02/27/07A business license (G63-01551) for a Finance Company has been applied for;however, the license has not been issued as of 05/18/15.


04/20/15A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant’s representative. Theattendees discussed the Special Use Permit submittal requirements for aFinancial, Institution, Specified use at 568 North Eastern Avenue, Suite A.



Field Check

4/30/15

A field check was conducted on the subject site, which revealed that the suitewas vacant, the Shopping Center is under construction and free of trash;however, a number of business have unpermitted temporary signage. Acomplaint was forwarded to Code Enforcement on 05/05/15 for non-permittedsignage in the Shopping Center.



SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR




Site Area

Net Acres 8.75

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Shopping CenterSC (ServiceCommercial)


NorthGeneral Retail Store,

Other Than ListedSC (ServiceCommercial)


Utility Installation,Other Than Listed

PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)

South Shopping CenterSC (ServiceCommercial)


East

Garden Supply/Plant Nursery



Multi-FamilyResidential



West Shopping CenterSC (ServiceCommercial)












Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

ShoppingCenter

79,500 SF 1:250 318





SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR



ANALYSIS

The Financial Institution, Specified use is defined as:

“Any business whose primary function is to:

1. Lend money;2. Cash checks or other negotiable instruments for a fee, service charge or otherconsideration; or3. Provide funds in exchange for the acceptance of a check on a post-dated or deferreddeposit basis.

This use includes without limitation a business that provides check cashing, services as a

principal service offered, a paycheck advance service, and any business primarily providing cash loans, installment loans or cash advances. The term does not include a pawn shop or a limited check cashing service, as described in this Section.”

The proposed use meets the definition as the applicant’s primary business will be installmentloans and/or cash advances.


1. * The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title6.

The proposed use will meet this requirement, as this use will be subject to regularinspections through the licensing review process.

2. * The building design and color scheme shall be subject to review by the Department toensure that it will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area.

The proposed use meets this standard, as the use will be located in an existing retailbuilding and any alterations require a building permit.

3. No temporary signs (as described in LVMC 19.08.120 (G)) such as balloons, inflateddevices, searchlights, pennants, portable billboards, portable signs, streamers, trucks

parked for signage purposes, or other similar devices are permitted, except that bannersannouncing a “grand opening” or that a business is “coming soon” may be approved

administratively for a period not to exceed 30 days.

The proposed use will meet this requirement, as the existing location is vacant and any sign or temporary signs require a permit.



SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR



4. Window signs shall not: (a) Cover more than 20 percent of the area of all exteriorwindows; (b) Include flashing lights or neon lighting; or (c) Include any text other than

text that indicates the hours of operation and whether the business is open or closed.

The proposed use meets this condition, as the proposed location is vacant and will have anumber of inspections throughout the building permit and business licensing process. Additionally, the site will undergo ongoing annual inspections through licensing.

5. The hours of operation shall not extend beyond the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Per justification letter dated stamped 05/11/15, this requirement will be met, as thislocation will operate between the hours of 8 a.m. and 11 p.m.

6. The building or portion thereof that is dedicated to the use shall have a minimum size of1500 square feet, and shall be designed to have sufficient interior space to provide foradequate customer waiting areas, customer queuing, and transaction space (such as“teller” windows or desks).

The requirement will be met, for the proposed location will be 1,711 square feet per floor plan date stamped 04/23/15.

7. No specified financial institution use may be located closer than 200 feet from any parcelused or zoned for residential use. In addition, no specified financial institution use may belocated closer than 1,000 feet from any other specified financial institution use, auto title

loan use, or auto pawn use. For purposes of this Requirement 7, distances shall bemeasured in a straight line from property line to property line, without regard tointervening obstacles. The term “property line” refers to property lines of fee interest

parcels and not leasehold parcels.

This requirement is not met, as there are two requested distance separation Waivers. The first Waiver is to allow a zero-foot distance separation from a residential use where 200 feet is required, and the second request is to allow a 112-foot distance separation from a similar use where 1,000 feet is required.

The proposed location of this use fails to comply with the minimum distance separationrequirements for the requested Special Use Permit. From the condominium parcel, the proposedzero-foot residential distance separation Waiver represents a 100% reduction from the required200-foot separation mandated by Title 19. The 112-foot distance separation Waiver from asimilar use represents approximately an 88% distance reduction from the 1,000 feet mandated byTitle 19. There are five, Financial Institution, Specified uses within 1,000 feet of the locationand the addition of one more may be the saturation point.



SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR



This application has been properly noticed and the Las Vegas Valley Water District returned thecomment below. “This parcel is currently served by LVVWD but the existing fire line does not

have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Installation of backflow prevention is required at this time.

In summation, the required Waivers and the existing five cash businesses within 1,000 feet of thesite reinforce the unsuitability of this site for the Financial Institution, Specified use with thesurrounding neighborhood. This use cannot be conducted in a harmonious and compatiblemanner with the existing neighborhood and surrounding land use. For these reasons, staffrecommends denial of this Special Use Permit.






The proposed Financial Institution, Specified use is compatible with the SC (ServiceCommercial) General Plan land use designation and is located within an existing shoppingcenter. However, the proposed use requires a Waiver of the residential distance separation

requirement and a distance separation Waiver from five similar uses, which reinforces theunsuitability of this site for the proposed Financial Institution, Specified use. The usecannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious or compatible with the surroundinguses.


The proposed development will be located within an established shopping center that hasample parking and adequate vehicular circulation for the proposed use. The site can physically support the Financial Institution, Specified use and a variety of other uses suchas administrative offices and general retail uses; however, the requested distance

separation Waivers highlight the unsuitability of the proposed Financial Institution,Specified use for this location.



Primary site access is from Bonanza Road and Eastern Avenue. Both roadways are a 100-foot wide Primary Arterials with adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.



SUP-59027 (PRJ-58965)

MR





General Plan.

The proposed Financial Institution, Specified will be subject to regular inspections byregulatory agencies for business licensing and therefore will not compromise the publichealth, safety and welfare, or the overall objectives of the General Plan.


The use does not comply with the minimum distance separation requirement required perTitle 19.12, as two Waivers are required for the approval of this application (residentialdistance separation Waiver and a similar use Waiver). Staff does not support the requested

Waivers.


NOTICES MAILED 82

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㅡ゜ธ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎɱ″ㄦ

SUP-59027



Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ Ќこ⇡ ผ ОŐİ ㄦฎɱ″ㄦ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ゜О ħ ħਙ ਙผ ƆⓈО ⑾ਙผ Ŵ ●ЌAЌ● AՁ ●ЌƆ╗●╗Ⓢ●Ќⓒ ƆОǲ●●ǲＣ

Оผਙ ㈾㌱ A₡₡ผ ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙỏ ㄦ ″ฎ ЌḶŐ ╗Ġ ǲ AƆ╗ǲŐЌ A ЋǲЌⓈǲⓒ ƆⓈ╗●ǲ A

Оผਙ ㈾

㌱

ЌŴこ

ḶОḶŐ ╗ⓈЌ ㄦ″ฎ ЌḶŐ ╗Ġ ǲ AƆ╗ǲŐЌ A ЋǲЌⓈǲҜⓒ ƆⓈ●╗ǲ A


ں ɱ ｘｘㄦںںں″

ÛŴผ₡ ÛAŐＣ ӧԱḶԱ Ḷ●Ќỏ


ਙผผ ㌱

Ќਙ

⑾ ਙⓒ ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴف ʉγŴ Оผਙ ㈾㌱ Ŵこ ħ Ḷऑਙผ ⓒ ● ħ ħਙ ħ こħऑ кк ₡

Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ Ｃ ħفŴ ħਙ Оผਙऑਙ ₡ Ḷ╗ĠǲŐ


Ḛผਙ A㌱ผ

Ձਙ

Ⓢħ

ں


Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħผ ЌŴこ Ḷऑਙผ ⓒ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ՁŴ ЌŴこ ՁՁ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ A₡₡ผ ″ｘｘ Ɔ Ŵऑਙผ Աк ₡㈠ Ɔں ㈠ ธㄦｘ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

ħ

Ő

₡ʉਙਙ₡ ħ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ɔ Ŵ A

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

Ύħऑ ɱㅡｘ″

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Оγਙ ″ㄦｘ ″ՙｘ ″ՙ″ՙ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ŵゥ゜Ŵ

Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

ǲこŴħк

ʉ

₡ ⇡

γ㈠ਙкħ

ผ㌀ऑผਙف

ผ

⑾ħ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ő ऑ ħผ ЌŴこ ╗ਙ

Ő

ऑ ՁŴ

ЌŴこ

к

Ő ऑ A₡₡ผ ฎ ㅡㄦ Û㈠ Ɔ Ő₡㈠ Ɔ ㈠ ธㄦｘ

Ő ऑ ħ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف

Ő

ऑ Ɔ

Ŵ

Ќ Ћ

Ő ऑ Ύħऑ ฎɱںں

Ő

ऑ Оγਙ

ՙｘธ ՙɱธ ՙｘｘｘ

Ő ऑ Ŵゥ

ՙｘธ ՙɱ″ ՙںฎں

Ő ऑ ǲこŴħк ㌱ к ㌀㌱ кŴʉ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ″ ゜ㄦں ธ ｘ ںㄦㄦｘฎ ㄦ ں О Ҝ


ｘㄦ゜ｘ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎɱ″ㄦSUP-59027







⇡ кħ ⑾㈠ ● ₡ ผ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ ħ







γ ऑผਙऑ ผ ħ ਙк ₡ ħ γħ




A㌱㌱ ऑ


⑾ ਙⓒ ㈠㈠㈠㌱γŴف

ʉγŴ

Ḷʉ ผӧỏ AＣＣŐں AＣＣŐธԱ ǲ ⓈЌḶ Ձ Ձ ОḶ ԱḶṲ ฎںں Ձ AƆ ЋǲḚAƆⓒ Ќ Ћ ฎɱں ฎںں


Ő Ŵผк ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵف Ɔผ ╗ ㌱γħ㌱Ŵк Ɔ こ AŴк ผ㌱Ŵผк ㌀кŴ Ŵف Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠فਙ

A Оħ ผ㌱ Ŵ こऑ⑾ ผ ผਙʉ кк ՁŴ₡ Ձħ㌱ ħف A₡こħ ผŴ ħਙ Ŵऑħ ผ㌱㌀㌱

кŴʉ㈠㌱ਙこ

ОŴ ธ ਙㄦ゜ ″ ธ ｘ ںㄦㄦｘฎ ㄦ ں О Ҝ


ｘㄦ゜ｘ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎɱ″ㄦ

SUP-59027



ｘ ㅡ ゜ ธ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ɱ ″ ㄦ

S U P - 5 9 0 2 7





S U P - 5 9 0 2 7



S U P - 5 9 0 2 7 [ P R J - 5

8 9 6 5 ] - S P E C I A L U S E P E

R M I T - A P P L I C A N T : O P O R T U N - O W N E R : B . E . U N

O , L L C

5 6 8 N O R T H E A S T E R N A V E N U E , S U I T E A

0 4 / 3 0 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜

゜

ㄦ


SUP-59027 - REVISED



ｘㄦ゜

゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎɱ″ㄦSUP-59027 - REVISED







SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - VAC-59208 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR EVERYONE, INC. - For possible action on a request for aPetition to Vacate two five-foot wide public drainage easements located at 1961-1973 SimmonsStreet, (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Supporting Documentation - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]

3. Conditions and Staff Report - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]4. Photo(s) - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]5. Justification Letter - VAC-59208 and SDR-58932 [PRJ-58587]



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR

EVERYONE, INC.


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

VAC-59208 Staff recommends APPROVAL, if approved subject toconditions:

SDR-58932 Staff recommends APPROVAL, if approved subject toconditions:

VAC-59208

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be a 5-foot wide public drainage easementlocated on Assessor Parcel #139-20-301-007 and a 5-foot wide public drainage easementlocated on Assessor Parcel #139-20-301-008.

2. Prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation, meet with the Flood Control Section ofthe Department of Public Works for assistance with establishing finished floor elevations

and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occurfirst. Provide and improve all drainage ways as recommended. Required Public DrainageEasements must be granted prior to the recordation of this Order of Vacation.




VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK

Conditions Page Two


4. The Order of Vacation shall not be recorded until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, that conditions requiring modification of public

improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by providing sufficient securityfor the performance thereof in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City ofLas Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify this application if necessary because oftechnical concerns or because of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is notchanged. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that willremain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, publiceasement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross anyright-of-way or easement being vacated must be retained.




Planning


2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan and buildingelevations, date stamped 05/20/15, except as amended by conditions herein.

3. A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow a nine-foot wide landscape

buffer along the east perimeter where 10 feet is the minimum required.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow zero-foot wide landscape buffers along a portion of the north and south perimeters where six feet is the minimumrequired.

5. An Exception from Title 19.06.040 is hereby approved, to allow 32 perimeter landscapetrees within the north, south, east and west landscape buffers where 42 trees are required.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed incompliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and

Safety.


8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, LandscapeArchitect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the sametime application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler systemis required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibilityof any traffic control device.


10. Prior to or at the time of submittal for any building permit, the applicant shall providewritten verification by the FAA and/or the Clark County Department of Aviation of thefollowing:

a. Record a stand-alone noise disclosure form against the land, and provide a copyof the recorded document to the Clark County Department of Aviation;

b. Provide a copy of the recorded noise disclosure form to future buyers/renters,

separate from other escrow documents, and provide a copy of the document tothe Clark County Department of Aviation;

c. Provide a map to future buyers/renters, as part of the noise disclosure notice,that highlights the project location and associated flight tracks, provided by theDepartment of Aviation when property sales/leases commence;

d. Incorporate an exterior to interior noise level reduction of 30 decibels into the building construction for the habitable space that exceeds 35 feet in height or 25decibels into the building construction for the habitable space that is less than 35feet in height.

11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be satisfied,

except as modified herein.

Public Works

12. A Petition of Vacation, such as VAC-59208, shall record prior to the issuance of any building permits to eliminate any drainage easements conflicts with this site.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



13. In accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56, remove all substandard offsiteimprovements, if any, and replace with new improvements meeting Current City Standards

concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by thisdevelopment shall be restored at its original location and to its original width concurrentwith development of this site.

14. Driveways must be constructed to meet the intent of Standard Drawing #225 or #226.S1with a maximum opening of 32 feet. Amend for ADA Compliance with the traffic engineerapproval. Egressing vehicles shall not back out into the roadway per Las Vegas MunicipalCode Title13.16.190.

15. Any landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. Alllandscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and

maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at alldevelopment access drives and abutting street intersections.

16. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for assistance withestablishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site prior to submittal ofconstruction plans, the issuance of any building or grading permits, or the submittal of amap for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainage ways asrecommended.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The two undeveloped lots total 0.48 acres and are located at the southwest corner of Coran Laneand Simmons Street, approximately 250 feet south of Coran Lane. The applicant is requesting toconstruct two 3,648 square-foot multi-family residential buildings, each consisting of four two bedroom units. As proposed, the new 7,296 square-foot multi-family development does notadhere to all minimum requirements as outlined by Title 19. The required landscape buffersadjacent to right-of-ways are being partially provided. The applicant is requesting Waivers andExceptions to address the landscaping issues. In addition, the proposed multi-family structures

do not adhere to the minimum residential adjacency setback requirements. As proposed, eachmulti-family residential building would locate on top of a five-foot wide public drainageeasement. The existing easements are in conflict with the proposed multi-family residentialdevelopment and are not needed in their current configurations. New drainage patterns will becreated with the redesign of the site. The applicant has requested an associated Petition to Vacate(VAC-59208) the two existing public drainage easements, which staff supports.

Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan encourages neighborhoodrevitalization through infill development of two, three and four plex housing opportunitiesthrough a variety of incentives including relaxation of setback requirements when offset withenhanced landscaping. Although the proposed development includes a request for Waivers of

residential adjacency standards and landscape buffer requirements, the landscape deviationrequests are minimal and located away from the protected residential uses. In addition, the proposed landscaping adjacent to the protected residential properties adheres to minimum coderequirements. As a result, the development meets the intent of Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the LasVegas 2020 Master Plan. As such, staff recommends approval of the Site Development PlanReview application. If denied, the requested development could not be constructed as proposedand the subject site would remain undeveloped. If the Petition to Vacate is denied, the easementswill remain as currently mapped.

ISSUES

According to Title 19.06.040(I)(e), the residential adjacency requirements may be waivedfor any multi-family residential project that is intended to meet the affordable housingobjectives of the General Plan. According to the submitted justification letter, the proposed multi-family residential buildings are designed for affordable housing.

The applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a residential adjacency setback of six feetwhere a minimum of 67.5 feet is required.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



A Waiver of Title 19.06.110 perimeter landscape requirement is required to allow a nine-foot wide buffer along the east property line where 10 feet is required. The Waiver

request constitutes a 10% deviation from standard. Waivers of Title 19.06.110 perimeter landscape requirements are required to allow zero-

foot wide buffers along a portion of the north and south property lines where 6 feet isrequired. Staff supports the Waiver request, as it is necessary to locate the required trashenclosure and only represents a ten-foot portion of a 105-foot long landscape buffer.

An Exception of Title 19.06.040 is required to allow 32 trees within the north, south, eastand west landscape buffers where 42 trees are required.

The existing five-foot wide public drainage easements, one on each lot, are in conflictwith the proposed multi-family residential development. As a result, a Petition to Vacateis required.



09/30/80

The Board of City Commissioners approved a Petition to Annex (A-0012-80)0.95 acres of property generally located on the west side of Simmons Street,approximately 249 feet south of Lake Mead Boulevard. The annexation became effective on 11/14/80.

06/09/15

The Planning Commission voted to abey a request for a Site DevelopmentPlan Review (SDR-58932) for two proposed four-unit multi-family residentialdevelopments with a Waiver to allow a residential adjacency setback of six

feet where a minimum of 67.5 feet is required and Waivers to allow zero-footwide landscape buffers along a portion of the north and south property lineswhere six feet is required and a nine-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent tothe right-of-way where ten feet is required on 0.48 acres at 1961-1973Simmons Street. An associated Vacation (VAC-59208) to vacate publicdrainage easements was also abeyed. The cases are scheduled to be heard atthe 07/14/15 Planning Commission meeting.




11/01/05A Civil Improvement Plan (#7946) was issued for eight houses at 1973Simmons Street. The permit was finalized on 12/13/05 and expired on09/18/11.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK




06/08/06

A building permit (#6004006) was issued for a single-family residential

structure at 1961 Simmons Street. The permit expired on 05/31/08.A building permit (#6004007) was issued for a single-family residentialstructure at 1965 Simmons Street. The permit expired on 05/31/08.

A building permit (#6004008) was issued for a single-family residentialstructure at 1969 Simmons Street. The permit expired on 08/25/08.

A building permit (#6004009) was issued for a single-family residentialstructure at 1973 Simmons Street. The permit expired on 08/25/08.

01/17/07

A building permit (#79928) was issued for a block wall at 1961 SimmonsStreet. The permit did not receive a final inspection.

A building permit (#79929) was issued for a block wall at 1973 SimmonsStreet. The permit did not receive a final inspection.

02/01/08A building permit (#107450) was issued for a block wall at 1965 SimmonsStreet. The permit did not receive a final inspection.


03/31/15

Staff held a pre-application meeting with the owner to discuss a proposal todevelop two vacant lots at 1961-1973 Simmons Street. The applicant proposed two four-unit multi-family residential development buildings. Staffconcluded that a Site Development Plan would be required, as well asWaivers for inadequate landscape buffers and residential adjacency standards.According to Title 19.06.040(I)(e), the residential adjacency requirements

may be waived for any multi-family residential project that is intended tomeet the affordable housing objectives of the General Plan.



Field Check

04/30/15

Staff conducted a routine field check and noted a vacant lot with a smallamount of trash. In addition, a half completed and abandoned CMU block

wall was noted along the north and west property lines. Chain link fencingwas noted along portions of the east property line.


Site Area

Gross Acres 0.48



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Undeveloped M (Medium DensityResidential)

R-3 (Medium DensityResidential)

North House of WorshipRN (Rural

Neighborhood) ClarkCounty

R-E (Rural EstatesResidential) Clark County

SouthSingle-Family,

DetachedM (Medium Density

Residential)R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)

EastMulti-FamilyResidential

H (High DensityResidential)

R-4 (High DensityResidential)

West UndevelopedRN (Rural

Neighborhood) Clark

County

R-E (Rural Estates

Residential) Clark County




A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 70 Feet Y


Trails N/A


Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/AProject of Regional Significance N/A


Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply:


Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF 10,326 SF Y

Min. Setbacks

Front

Side Rear

10 Feet

5 Feet20 Feet

15 Feet

6 Feet20 Feet

Y

YY

Max. Building Height 55 Feet 22.5 Feet Y

Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/a Roof or Trellis

Screened,Gated w/ a

TrellisY




VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance

3:1 proximity slope 67.5 Feet 6 Feet N*

Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 52 Feet Y*According to Title 19.06.040(I)(e), the residential adjacency requirements may be waived forany multi-family residential project that is intended to meet the affordable housing objectives ofthe General Plan. According to the submitted justification letter, the proposed multi-familyresidential buildings are designed for affordable housing and the applicant has requested aWaiver to address the residential adjacency issue.

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:



Ratio Trees

Buffer Trees:

North

South

West

East




N NY N




4 Trees 2 Trees N

LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHSMin. Zone Width

North

South

East

West



N N NY

Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Not Indicated N/A

Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Simmons Street Local StreetMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways 59 Feet Y



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply: Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Multi-FamilyResidential

8 TwoBedroomUnits

1.75spaces per

unit14

1 guestspace per

6 units

2

Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped



Waivers


10-foot perimeter landscape buffer along the east propertyline

Nine Feet Approval

6-foot perimeter landscape buffer along the north propertyline

Zero Feet Approval

6-foot perimeter landscape

buffer along the south propertyline

Zero Feet Approval

Residential Adjacency setbackof 67.5 Feet

Six Feet Approval



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



Exceptions

Requirement Request Staff Recommendation24-inch box shade trees per 20linear feet within the northlandscape buffer (12 required)

Eight Trees Approval

24-inch box shade trees per 20linear feet within the southlandscape buffer (12 required)

Eight Trees Approval

24-inch box shade trees per 20linear feet within the eastlandscape buffer (8 required)

4 Trees Approval

ANALYSIS

The subject site consists of two undeveloped lots totaling 0.48 acres located at the southwestcorner of Coran Lane and Simmons Street, approximately 250 feet south of Coran Lane. Theapplicant is requesting to construct a two-story, four-unit multi-family residential building oneach undeveloped lot. The site’s development is proposed within the context of an R-3 (MediumDensity Residential) zoned property along a well-established multi-family residential corridor.The R-3 (Medium Density Residential) District is intended to provide for the development of avariety of multi-family units such as duplexes, townhouses and medium density apartments.

The submitted site plan, date stamped 05/20/15, illustrates two identical 3,648 square-foot multi-family residential buildings, each consisting of four two bedroom units. The primary buildingmaterials utilized to construct the two proposed four unit multi-family buildings are stucco,smooth concrete block and wood soffit. The various materials and carefully designed variations, patterns, jogs, and offsets assist in dividing the 22.5-foot tall building masses and createarchitectural character.

Each multi-family residential building would locate on top of a five-foot wide public drainageeasement. The existing easements are in conflict with the proposed multi-family residentialdevelopment and are not needed in their current configurations. New drainage patterns will becreated with the redesign of the site. The applicant has requested an associated Petition to Vacate

(VAC-59208) the two existing public drainage easements, which staff supports. As no right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary tosend this VAC request to the utility companies and franchise holders, nor wait for theirresponses. Since only City easements are involved, any utility company interests will need to beaddressed with each respective utility company and will not be affected by the City vacating itsinterest.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



As proposed, the new 7,296 square-foot multi-family development does not adhere to allminimum requirements as outlined by Title 19. The proposed structures do not adhere to the

minimum residential adjacency setback requirement. Although the proposed heights of 22.5 feetare within the maximum height requirements typically allowed in the R-3 (Medium DensityResidential) zone, the subject site is adjacent to residentially zoned properties to the north andwest. As a result, the subject site is subject to Residential Adjacency Standards. As proposed, the22.5-foot tall buildings would require a 67.5-foot setback to the nearest protected property, asoutlined by Title 19.08.040(H). According to the submitted site plan, each building would only provide a 20-foot setback to the R-E (Rural Estates Residential – Clark County) property to thewest where 67.5 feet is the minimum required. Furthermore, the northern most proposed multi-family building would provide a six-foot setback to the R-E (Rural Estates Residential – ClarkCounty) property to the north where 67.5 feet is the minimum required. Typically, a Variance isrequired to address a residential adjacency issue. However, according to Title 19.06.040(I)(e),

the residential adjacency requirements may be waived for any multi-family residential projectthat is intended to meet the affordable housing objectives of the General Plan. According to thesubmitted justification letter, the proposed multi-family residential buildings are designed foraffordable housing. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a Waiver to address the issue.

In addition, the required landscape buffers adjacent to the right-of-way and interior lot lines are being partially provided. Specifically, the applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a nine-footwide landscape buffer along the east property line where a ten-foot wide landscape buffer isrequired. The request represents a ten percent deviation from standard. The applicant is alsorequesting Waivers to allow zero-foot wide landscape buffers along portions of the north and

south property lines where six-foot wide landscape buffers are required. According to thesubmitted justification letter, the applicant is not providing the required landscape bufferadjacent to Simmons Street in an effort to accommodate the necessary on-site parking andvehicle circulation demands. There was no justification provided for the lack of landscape buffers along the side property lines. However, the request along the side property lines wouldonly occur along a ten-foot portion of a 105-foot long landscape buffer. The Waiver is necessaryto locate the required on-site trash enclosures. The remaining 95 feet of landscape buffer adheresto Title 19 requirements.

Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan encourages neighborhoodrevitalization through infill development of two, three and four plex housing opportunities

through a variety of incentives including relaxation of setback requirements when offset withenhanced landscaping. Although the proposed development includes a request for Waivers ofresidential adjacency standards and landscape buffer requirements, the landscape deviationrequests are minimal and located away from the protected residential uses. In addition, the proposed landscaping adjacent to the protected residential properties adheres to minimum coderequirements. As a result, the development meets the intent of Policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the LasVegas 2020 Master Plan and staff recommends approval of the Site Development Plan Review.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



The Department of Planning routed this request for a Vacation and Site Development Plan

Review to outside agencies for review. The Clark County Department of Aviation respondedwith the following comments. “The property lies within the AE-60 (60-65 DNL) noise contourfor the North Las Vegas Airport (VGT). The subject property is exposed to significant single-event aircraft overflight noise, and many aircraft are at very low altitudes above it. Futuredemand for air travel and airport operations is expected to increase significantly. Clark Countyintends to continue to upgrade VGT to meet future air traffic demand. Residential propertieslocated in the AE-60 in the City of North Las Vegas, City of Henderson, and Clark Countywould require the applicant to:

Record a stand-alone noise disclosure form against the land, and provide a copy of the

recorded document to the Clark County Department of Aviation;

Provide a copy of the recorded noise disclosure form to future buyers/renters, separate

from other escrow documents, and provide a copy of the document to the Clark County

Department of Aviation;

Provide a map to future buyers/renters, as part of the noise disclosure notice, that

highlights the project location and associated flight tracks, provided by the Department of

Aviation when property sales/leases commence;

Incorporate an exterior to interior noise level reduction of 30 decibels into the building

construction for the habitable space that exceeds 35 feet in height or 25 decibels into the

building construction for the habitable space that is less than 35 feet in height.It is also

advised that the Federal Aviation Administration will no longer approve remedial noisemitigation measures for incompatible development impacted by aircraft operations which

was constructed after October 1, 1998, and funds will not be available in the future should

the residents wish to have their buildings purchased or soundproofed.”

In addition to the Clark County Department of Aviation, the Las Vegas Valley Water Districtresponded with the following comment. “These two parcels are currently served by LVVWD butdo not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. If the proposeddevelopment will span over the two parcels, proof of parcel lot consolidation will be required prior to obtaining service from LVVWD. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to

LVVWD.”

Finally, the Clark County School District submitted a School Development Tracking Formdetailing the closest elementary school, middle school and high school to the proposed multi-family residential development. The form also details the capacity levels for each school.According to the submitted tracking form, Detwiler Elementary School is currently 51.81 percentover capacity for the 2014-15 school year.



VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK




The existing five-foot wide public drainage easements are in conflict with the proposed multi-family residential development and are not needed in their current configurations. New drainage patterns will be created with the redesign of the site. For these reasons, staff recommendsapproval of the requested Petition to Vacate.





The two proposed four-unit, multi-family buildings are compatible with the predominantlymulti-family residential uses in the surrounding area.




The proposed development is consistent with policies 2.1.5 and 2.6.2 of the Las Vegas2020 Master Plan.



The primary access to the subject site is from Simmons Street, a 59-foot wide Local Streetas designated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways. The access points are adequateto meet the traffic needs for this project.


The proposed building materials are appropriate for the area and for the City.







VAC-59208 & SDR-58932 (PRJ-58587)

GK



The building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aestheticfeatures are compatible with development in the area. The elevations provide a variety of

patterns of visual interest.


general welfare.

The proposed project will not impact public health, safety or general welfare as the site issubject to City inspections during construction, as well as routine business licenseinspections for any commercial activity.


NOTICES MAILED 10 - VAC-59208214 - SDR-58932

APPROVALS 0 - VAC-592080 - SDR-58932

PROTESTS 0 - VAC-59208

1 - SDR-58932



ｘㄦ゜ｘՙ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㄦฎՙ

VAC-59208



ｘㄦ゜ｘՙ゜

ㄦ


VAC-59208



ｘㄦ゜ ธ ｘ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ㄦ ฎ ՙ



Ⓢ Ќ

● ╗

Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ ㅡ

Ⓢ Ќ

● ╗

Ⓢ Ќ ● ╗ ธ





ｘㄦ゜ธｘ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎㄦฎՙ



School Development Tracking Form

Date Filed Application Number Entity

Company NameContact Name

Contact Mailing Address

City State Zip Code

Phone Mobile Fax Email

Project Name

Project Description

APN's

Approved Disapproved

Real Property Management

4190 McLeod Drive, 2nd Floor

Las Vegas, NV 89121

Single-Family Units (1) x 0.195 = x 0.102 = x 0.135 =

Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.135 = x 0.056 = x 0.062 =

Resort Condo Units (3)

http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property

Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School

Total

(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes. (2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.

(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.

* To be completed by CCSD

Name

Schools Serving the Area*

Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date

* CCSD Comments

VAC-59208 and SDR-58932

05/01/2015 PRE-58587 LV

Affordable Housing for Everyone

Affordable Housing for Everyone

1961 and 1973 Simmons St

139-20-301-007, 008

0 0 0

8 1 0 0

1 0 0

Detwiler ES 1960 Ferrell St K-5 525 730 03/20/15

West Prep. Inst. for Acad. Excell. 6-82050 Saphire Stone Ave 1352 1326 03/20/15

Western HS 4601 W. Bonanza Rd 9-12 2776 2393 03/20/15

Detwiler ES is over capacity for the 2014-15 school year. Detwiler ES is 51.81% over capacity.



V A C - 5 9 2 0 8

[ P R J - 5 8 5 8 7 ] -

V A C A T I O N R E L A T E D

T O

S D R - 5 8 9 3 2

- A P P L I C A N T / O W N E R : A F F O R D A B L E

H O U S I N G F O R E V E R Y O N E , I N C .

1 9 6 1 - 1 9 7 3 S I M M O

N S S T R E E T

0 4 / 3 0 / 1 5



V A C - 5 9 2 0 8

[ P R J - 5 8 5 8 7 ] -


T O

S D R - 5 8 9 3 2



1 9 6 1 - 1 9 7 3 S I M M O

N S S T R E E T

0 4 / 3 0 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ｘՙ゜

ㄦ








SUBJECT:ABEYANCE - SDR-58932 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-59208 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOREVERYONE, INC. - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FORTWO PROPOSED FOUR-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITHA WAIVER TO ALLOW A RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK OF SIX FEET WHEREA MINIMUM OF 67.5 FEET IS REQUIRED AND WAIVERS TO ALLOW ZERO-FOOTWIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ALONG A PORTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTHPROPERTY LINES WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED AND A 9-FOOT WIDELANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY WHERE TEN FEET IS

REQUIRED on 0.48 acres at 1961-1973 Simmons Street (APNs 139-20-301-007 and 008), R-3(Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-58587]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.







BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup2. Location and Aerial Maps3. Supporting Documentation4. Protest Postcards





paper use, backup










ｘㅡ゜ธｘ゜

ㄦ


SDR-58932







SUBJECT:GPA-59210 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: HAFEN I, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General PlanAmendment FROM: RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: M (MEDIUMDENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 0.48 acres at 3316 Valley Lane (APN 139-20-310-025), Ward 5(Barlow) [PRJ-59167]. Staff recommends APPROVAL

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

4. Photo(s) - GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]5. Justification Letter - GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: HAFEN I, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

GPA-59210 Staff recommends APPROVAL.

ZON-59512 Staff recommends APPROVAL. GPA-59210



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan and Zoning designation to allow for thedevelopment of a multi-family, veteran’s apartment building on a recently annexed parcel. TheGeneral Plan Land Use would change from RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) to M(Medium Density Residential) and the Zoning designation would change from R-E (ResidenceEstates) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). The properties to the east and south, in the Cityof Las Vegas, already have multi-family developments. The request is compatible with theseadjacent uses and the development trend for this area. For these reasons, staff recommends

approval. If denied, no permits for a multi-family development would be issued.



05/20/15The City Council approved Annexation (ANX-57905) for 0.48 acres at 3316Valley Lane. The effective date was 05/29/15.




No permits are on file for this property.


05/04/15Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements for a General PlanAmendment and a Rezoning application for a recently annexed parcel in

Ward 5.


06/16/15Meeting Start Time: 5:30 p.m. Meeting End Time: 5:55 p.m.

Attendance: 4 Public, 2 Applicants and 1 Planning Staff



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK




The residents were all members of the same family that owned property to the

north, but not immediately adjacent to the site. They were opposed toadditional apartments in the area citing crime, low occupancy rates,etc… However, if the project were to be approved, they wanted largeevergreen trees along the north perimeter. The applicant agreed.

Field Check

06/11/15

Staff visited the site and found a vacant single-family dwelling. The propertywas secure with a temporary chain link fence. There were several large pilesof dirt in the yard. The structure appeared to be in good shape. There was anunfinished block and iron fence in the front yard.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.48

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property

Single-Family,

Detached

RNP (Rural

NeighborhoodPreservation) R-E (Residence Estates)

NorthSingle-Family,

Detached

RN (Rural Neighborhood) Clark

Co.

R-E (Rural EstatesResidential District) Clark

Co.

South Multi-FamilyH (High Density

Residential)R-4 (High Density

Residential)

East Multi-FamilyM (Medium Density

Residential)R-3 (Medium Density

Residential)

WestSingle-Family,

Detached

RN (Rural Neighborhood) Clark

Co.

R-E (Rural EstatesResidential District) Clark

Co.




A-O (Airport Overlay) District 70-Feet Y



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK




Trails N/A

Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/AProject of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A



General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed

RNP (Rural NeighborhoodPreservation)

2.00 Units per Acre 1

Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed



Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

R-E (Residence Estates) 2.00 Units per Acre 1

Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

R-3 (Medium DensityResidential)


Street Name

Functional

Classification of Street(s) Governing Document

Actual

Street Width(Feet)

Compliance

with Street Section

Valley Lane Residential StreetPlanned Streets and

Highways Map47 Y

ANALYSIS

The applicant indicated to staff at the pre-application meeting that the intent is to develop lowincome housing for disabled veterans. To accomplish this goal, the property needs to have a landuse and zoning change. The applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment from RNP

(Rural Neighborhood Preservation) to M (Medium Density Residential) and a Rezoning from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential).

This parcel is located in Census Tract 34.31, which has a Median Household Income of $33,011according to the U.S. Census Bureau 2013 American Community Survey. This survey isupdated every five years. However, the Median Household Income for the City of Las Vegas asa whole is $51,143. This clearly illustrates that the neighborhood is in the extremely low- andlow-income household area of the City.



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK



The Housing Element of the Las Vegas General Plan, Implementation strategies, NeighborhoodRevitalization, Encourage Infill and Redevelopment section states, “The City of Las Vegas also

has an issue with extremely low- and low-income households of all types who are underservedwith respect to affordable housing. In order to overcome this gap, the City strategies provideadditional affordable rental and owner housing opportunities including acquisition, rehabilitationand new construction of rental and owner housing units.”

The Clark County Department of Aviation (CCDOA) is extremely concerned about the proposedmulti-family residential development proposal and recommends denial of the applications. Sincethe mid 1980’s, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has recommended that no newresidential development be constructed within the 65 DNL (Day/Night Level) and higher, whichthis project is located. The average DNL for an urban area is 35 – 55 DNL. For almost twodecades, the CCDOA has opposed many, if not all, land use applications around airports owned

and operated by the CCDOA which have included an increase in residential densities in the 60DNL and higher. An example of how the Federal Government uses this information would be ifa housing project for seniors were proposed in a 65 DNL and is using a HUD grant forconstruction, the project would be denied and no HUD funds would be allowed for the project asa result of the 65+ DNL.

Although the parcels to the north and west are low density residential areas located in ClarkCounty, the development pattern in the area has been towards higher densities and this proposalfits this trend. For example, just to the north, in the City of North Las Vegas, a multi-familydevelopment was recently approved.

Given the need for additional housing, the overall development pattern in this area and thecompatibility with adjacent multi-family developments, staff recommends approval of bothapplication requests.

FINDINGS (GPA-59210)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions be metin order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible

with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The intensity allowed under the proposed M (Medium Density Residential) land usedesignation is compatible with the adjacent M (Medium Density Residential) on the eastand the H (High Density Residential) land use designation on the west.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible with

the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK



The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment are compatible with theexisting land use and zoning designations adjacent on the east on south of the parcel. The

adjacent parcels on the north and west are located in Clark County with R-E (Rural EstatesResidential District) zoning.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan

Amendment; and

The site is accessed by Valley Lane, a 47-foot wide Residential Street, as designated by themaster Plan of Streets and Highways and is adequate for the proposed land usedesignation.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policiesthat include approved neighborhood plans.

All applicable plans and policies are met with the proposed amendment.

FINDINGS (ZON-59512)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the PlanningCommission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district is consistent with therelated, proposed M (Medium Density Residential) General Plan designation for this site.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoning

will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The uses allowed by the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district are compatiblewith the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or

appropriateness of the rezoning.

The Housing Element of the Las Vegas General Plan adopted on 04/17/13 indicates a lackof rental property in low income areas of the City, which this parcel is located. Thisrezoning will allow for new, multi-tenant residential units to be developed.


size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.



GPA-59210 and ZON-59212 [PRJ-59167]

YK



The site is accessed by Valley Lane, a 47-foot wide Residential Street, as designated by themaster Plan of Streets and Highways and is adequate for the proposed land use

designation.


NOTICES MAILED 193

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜

゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ″ՙ

GPA-59210



ƆⓈԱİǲ╗ ОŐḶОǲŐ╗

ḶŐA Ќ

ՁЌ

ĠḶՁՁ AЋǲ

A Ձ

Ձ ǲ

Ќ

Ձ Ќ

ǲ Ő Ő ǲ Ձ Ձ Ɔ ╗

A ЌＣǲŐƆḶЌ

ՁЌ

A Ձ

Û ● Ձ Ձ Ɔ ╗

● Ќ

Ｃ

Ɔ Ⓢ ǲ Ɔ ╗

ЋAՁՁǲ ՁЌ

Û ● Ќ

Ｃ

Ġ ● Ҝ ǲ Ｃ Ő

Ő Ɔ ╗ A Ձ Ġ ● Ҝ ǲ Ɔ Ｃ Ő

ǲ A Ɔ ╗ Ձ Ќ

Ḛ Ḷ

Ձ Ｃ

ǲ Ќ

Ɔ

Ｃ Ő

Û●ЌＣƆ╗ḶŐ

Ҝ A Ћǲ

Û ● Ձ Ձ Ḷ Û Ա Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ｃ Ő

ĠḶՁՁ

ՁЌ

Ɔ Ⓢ Ќ Ɔ ǲ ╗

Ｃ Ő

О ǲ Ő ● Ｃ Ḷ ╗ О Ḷ ● Ќ ╗ Ɔ ╗

Ɔ●ЌḚ ƆḶЌḚ ÛA

Ḛ Ḷ

Ḷ Ｃ Û ● Ձ Ձ Ɔ ╗

ＣǲƆǲŐ╗ ƆḶЌḚ ＣŐ

ÛḶḶＣՁAЌＣ AЋǲ

ҜḶŐЌ●ЌḚƆ●Ｃǲ

AЋǲ

╗ Ḷ

Ⓢ Ő Ҝ A Ձ

● Ќ ǲ Ա Ձ Ⓢ

ǲ Ɔ ╗

ǲ

Ő Ő ǲ Ձ

Ձ

Ɔ ╗

Ɔ ● Ҝ Ҝ Ḷ Ќ Ɔ Ɔ ╗

Û ՁA ǲ

ҜǲA Ｃ ԱՁЋ Ｃ

Ќ Ő A Ќ Ġ

Ḷ

Ｃ Ő

ḚОA ㄦɱธ ｘ

㌫ŐḶҜ ŐЌО ╗Ḷ

ＣŴ ╗ γผ₡Ŵⓒ ҜŴ ㅡⓒ ธ

Ḛ●Ɔ こŴऑ Ŵผ ਙผこŴкк ऑผਙ₡ਙк ਙ こ γ ₡ ਙ⑾γ

Ｃ ਙ ㌱ਙ ħਙ ₡ ٹ кਙऑこ


Ḛ ਙفผŴऑγħ㌱ ●⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ ƆОкŴ ħف Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこＣ

ՙｘธ ธธɱ ″ ｘ

Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ A こ ₡こ ש

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ɔ Ɔ ผٹ

ħ㌱ ਙここ

ผ㌱ħŴк

Ḛ Ḛ ผŴк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

Ҝ Ҝ

₡ħこ

Ġ Ġħف

γ

ҜՁA Ҝ

₡ħ こ Ձਙ ʉ A Ŵ㌱γ

₡

Ձ● Ő Ձħفγ ●₡ ผħŴк Ő Ŵผ㌱γ

ОＣ ОкŴ ₡ ਙここħ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

ОŐ ḶƆ ОŴผ Ő ㌱ผ

Ŵ ħਙ ゜ Ḷऑ ƆऑŴ㌱

О О⇡кħ㌱ Ŵ㌱ħкħ

ՁЋҜＣ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Ҝ ₡ħ㌱ŴкفＣħ ผħ㌱

Ḛ╗ ╗ਙผħ ਙここ

ผ㌱ħŴк

╗ ╗ਙ ʉ ผ

Ő Ő

ਙผ㌱ ਙ

ผŴ ħਙٹ

Ｃਙ ʉ ਙ ʉ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ҜṲⓈ Ｃਙ ʉ ਙ ʉ Ҝħゥ ₡ Ⓢ

╗ЌＣ ╗ผŴ₡ħਙŴк Ќ

ħف

γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡

Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ


кŴผ ਙ ŐЌО ŐผŴк Ќ

ħف

γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ Оผ

ผŴ ħਙٹ

Őǲ ŐผŴк ǲ Ŵ

ＣŐ Ｃ ผ ŐผŴк

Ő ŐผŴ к

Ձ Ձਙ ʉ

ҜՁ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙ ʉ

ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡ ㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

Ձ

Û ● Ձ Ձ Ḷ

Ա Ő

Ḷ

ÛḶḶＣՁA Ｃ A ǲ

Ձ● ゜ Ձħفγ ●₡ ħŴк ゜ Ŵ γ

О Ｃ

Ок ₡ ここ ħ Ｃ ٹ к こ

О

Ḷ ОŴผ ゜

Ŵ ħਙ ゜ ऑ ㌱

О О кħ ħкħ

ف ħħħħħħħ кккккккＣħ ผħ㌱

╗

╗ ħ ここ㌱ħŴк

╗ ╗ ʉ

Ｃਙ ʉ ʉ

ҜṲ Ｃ ʉ

╗ЌＣ

╗ผŴ ħਙ к

Ｃ ٹ к こ

О О кħ㌱ккккккк

ｘㄦ゜ ㅡ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱ ″ՙ

GPA-59210



CITY OF LAS VEGAS

PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL

RECOMMENDATIONS / COMMENTS

FROM: CLARK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION

APPLICATION NUMBER: GPA-59210 & ZON-59212

PROJECT: HAFEN I, LLC

LOCATION: 139-20-310-025

MEETING DATE: JULY 14, 2015, PLANNING COMMISSION AND

AUGUST 19, 2015, CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

COMMENTS:

The Clark County Department of Aviation (CCDOA) is extremely concerned about the proposed

HAFEN I, LLC, multi-family residential development proposal (GPA-59120 and ZON-59212) and

recommends denial of the application. As depicted below, the proposed development (depicted bythe light blue box) lies within the 60 decibel, A-weighted, day-night annual average noise level (60DNL) for the North Las Vegas Airport (VGT) and is subject to continuing aircraft noise and over-flights. The proposed project would increase the number of residential units exposed to a significant

level of aircraft noise. The subject parcel is master planned and zoned for up to two (2)

dwelling units per acre (Rural Neighborhood Preservation and Residence Estates) and should

remain a very low-density residential use.

Noise Contours for the North Las Vegas Airport



Since the mid 1980’s, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has recommended that no newresidential development be constructed within the 65 DNL and higher. For almost two decades, theCCDOA has opposed many, if not all, land use applications around airports owned and operated bythe CCDOA which have included an increase in residential densities in the 60 DNL and higher.

As depicted in the following graphic, the subject property (depicted by the yellow star) is less than4,000 feet from the primary departure runways for VGT and is routinely exposed to numerousoverflights. These flight patterns have been used since the 1940s, and the subject parcels shouldremain a non-residential use.

VGT Radar Tracks for a typical day weekend

Future demand for air travel is expected to increase significantly. Although daily operations at VGThave decreased by 45% over the last ten years (from 635 average operations per day in 2005 to 350average operations per day in 2014), the Final Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Runway12L-30R for VGT, completed in May 1997, forecast that 150% more operations (or more than 900average operations per day) could be accommodated at VGT sometime in the near future.

Residential projects located in the AE-60 in the City of North Las Vegas, City of Henderson, and

Clark County would require the applicant to:

• Record a stand-alone noise disclosure form against the land, and provide a copy of therecorded document to the CCDOA;

• Provide a copy of the recorded noise disclosure form to future buyers/renters, separate fromother escrow documents, and provide a copy of the document to the CCDOA;



• Provide a map to future buyers/renters, as part of the noise disclosure notice, that highlightsthe project location and associated flight tracks, provided by the CCDOA when propertysales/leases commence;

• Incorporate an exterior to interior noise level reduction of 30 decibels into the buildingconstruction for the habitable space that exceeds 35’ in height or 25 decibels into the

building construction for the habitable space that is less than 35’ in height;

The CCDOA recommends that the conditions listed above be imposed on this project, if

approved.

It is also noted that the FAA will no longer approve remedial noise mitigation measures forincompatible development impacted by aircraft operations which was constructed after October 1,1998, and funds will not be available in the future should the residents wish to have their buildings purchased or soundproofed.



G P A - 5 9 2 1 0 [ P R J - 5

9 1 6 7 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M E N T R E L A T E D T

O Z O N - 5 9 2 1 2 - A P P L I C A

N T / O W N E R :

H A F E N I , L L C

3 3 1 6 V A L L E Y L A N E

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜

゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ″ՙGPA-59210 and ZON-59212







SUBJECT:ZON-59212 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59210 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: HAFEN I, LLC - For possible action on a request for a RezoningFROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on0.48 acres at 3316 Valley Lane (APN 139-20-310-025), Ward 5 (Barlow) [PRJ-59167]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:







paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜

゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱ ″ՙ

ZON-59212




ḶŐA Ќ

ՁЌ

ĠḶՁՁ AЋǲ

A Ձ

Ձ ǲ

Ќ

Ձ Ќ

ǲ Ő Ő ǲ Ձ Ձ Ɔ ╗

A ЌＣǲŐƆḶЌ

ՁЌ

A Ձ

Û ● Ձ Ձ Ɔ ╗

● Ќ

Ｃ

Ɔ Ⓢ ǲ Ɔ ╗

ЋAՁՁǲ ՁЌ

Û ● Ќ

Ｃ

Ġ ● Ҝ ǲ Ｃ Ő

Ő Ɔ ╗ A Ձ Ġ ● Ҝ ǲ Ɔ Ｃ Ő

ǲ A Ɔ ╗ Ձ Ќ

Ḛ Ḷ

Ձ Ｃ

ǲ Ќ

Ɔ

Ｃ Ő

Û●ЌＣƆ╗ḶŐ

Ҝ A Ћǲ

Û ● Ձ Ձ Ḷ Û Ա Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ｃ Ő

ĠḶՁՁ

ՁЌ

Ɔ Ⓢ Ќ Ɔ ǲ ╗

Ｃ Ő

О ǲ Ő ● Ｃ Ḷ ╗ О Ḷ ● Ќ ╗ Ɔ ╗

Ɔ●ЌḚ ƆḶЌḚ ÛA

Ḛ Ḷ

Ḷ Ｃ Û ● Ձ Ձ Ɔ ╗

ＣǲƆǲŐ╗ ƆḶЌḚ ＣŐ


ҜḶŐЌ●ЌḚƆ●Ｃǲ

AЋǲ

╗ Ḷ

Ⓢ Ő Ҝ A Ձ

● Ќ ǲ Ա Ձ Ⓢ

ǲ Ɔ ╗

ǲ

Ő Ő ǲ Ձ

Ձ

Ɔ ╗

Ɔ ● Ҝ Ҝ Ḷ Ќ Ɔ Ɔ ╗

Û ՁA ǲ

ҜǲA Ｃ ԱՁЋ Ｃ

Ќ Ő A Ќ Ġ

Ḷ

Ｃ Ő

ΎḶЌ

ㄦɱธ

ธ

㌫ŐḶҜ Ő ǲ ╗Ḷ Ő

ＣŴ ╗ γผ₡Ŵⓒ ҜŴ ㅡⓒ ธ

Ḛ●Ɔ こŴऑ Ŵผ ਙผこŴкк ऑผਙ₡ਙк ਙ こ γ ₡ ਙ⑾γ



Ḛ ਙفผŴऑγħ㌱ ●⑾ਙผこŴשħਙ ƆОкŴ ħف Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこＣ


ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

ΎਙħفŐ ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ Ｃ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк



Ő ҜĠ Ҝਙ⇡ħк ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ Ő ħ₡ ㌱


Ő ҜĠО Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ҝਙ⇡ħк ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ ОŴผ




Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱


Ձħこħ ₡ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк



Ҝ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк ●₡ ผħŴк

Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱




╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ


Ⓢ ӧḚО A Ｃ ħفŴ ħਙỏ Ⓢ₡ ٹ кਙऑ ₡


Ő Ｃ Ɔħفк Ŵこħк Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ő ผħ㌱ ₡

Ő ОＣ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк ОкŴ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

Ő Ɔħف к Ŵこħк Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő Ձ Ɔħفк Ŵこħк ਙこऑŴ㌱

Ձਙ

Ձ

Û ● Ձ Ձ Ḷ

Ա Ő

Ḷ


О О ਙ⑾ ħਙŴк ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ќ Ɔ

Ќ ħفγ⇡ ผγਙ ₡ Ɔ ผٹħ

⑾⑾ħ

ħف ₡ ħŴк

Ձħこħ ₡ ここ ħŴк

Ŵк ħŴк

ОԱ

ОкŴ ₡ Ա ħ О

Ҝ

ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк゜

Ҝ

● ผħŴк

Ћ

ħٹħ

О ОкŴ ₡

╗ Ｃ

╗ Ŵ₡ħ ħਙŴк Ｃ

О ОкŴ ₡ ٹ

ʉ

ｘㄦ゜ ㅡ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱ ″ՙ

ZON-59212







SUBJECT:GPA-59270 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:POSITIVELY KIDS - OWNER: SWAN FOUNDATION, LLC - For possible action on arequest for a General Plan Amendment FROM: O (OFFICE) TO: SC (SERVICECOMMERCIAL) on 1.82 acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-036),Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58502]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272 [PRJ-58502]3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272 [PRJ-58502]

4. Photo(s) - GPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272 [PRJ-58502]5. Justification Letter - GPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272 [PRJ-58502]6. Protest E-mail - GPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272 [PRJ-58502]



GPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272 [PRJ-58502]

YK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: POSITIVELY KIDS - OWNER: SWAN

FOUNDATION, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL



SDR-59272 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-59270 ZON-59271

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for General Plan Amendment(GPA-59270) and Rezoning (ZON-59271) shall be required, if approved.


3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and building

elevations, date stamped 06/01/15, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be completed incompliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set submitted for building permit.




YK

Conditions Page Two


6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape Architect,Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the same time

application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler system isrequired, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape planshall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of anytraffic control device.


Public Works

8. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks adjacent to

this site on Charleston Boulevard in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, ifany, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.

9. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site. Alllandscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated andmaintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at alldevelopment access drives and abutting street intersections.

10. Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) for all private improvements in the Charleston Boulevard public right-of-way, if any, adjacent to thissite prior to constructing any improvements within NDOT jurisdiction.

11. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must besubmitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to submittal of anyconstruction drawings or the issuance of any building or grading permits, whichever mayoccur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainagestudy update.




YK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting to convert an existing medical office building into a ConvalescentCare Facility/Nursing Home for children with life-threatening illnesses. The façade of the building will remain but the interior of the building will be completely gutted and redesigned forthe proposed use. The site is over parked and the applicant is proposing to remove 12 parkingspaces in the rear of the property and create a “green” space for the children to enjoy during their

stay. In order to allow for the Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home use, a General PlanAmendment, Rezoning and a Site Development Plan Review application are required. Staffsupports the requests, as the project is located on a Primary Arterial street, near the medicaldistrict and has no direct access to the residential neighborhood to the north.

ISSUES

A General Plan Amendment is required from O (Office) to SC (Service Commercial) toallow for a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home. Staff supports this request.

A Rezoning is required from C-D (Commercial-Development) to C-1 (LimitedCommercial) to allow for a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home. Staff supportsthis request.



10/15/01 The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0047-01) toamend portions of the Southeast Sector map of the General Plan in the generalvicinity of the Charleston Boulevard/Rancho Drive intersection from: SC(Service Commercial) to: O (Office); from: R (Rural Density Residential)to: DR (Desert Rural Density Residential); from: O (Office) to: DR (DesertRural Density Residential) and; from: L (Low Density Residential) to: DR(Desert Rural Density Residential) in accordance with the recommendationsof the Rancho Charleston Land Use Study and Strategic Plan. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.

03/15/06 The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review(SDR-10519) for a proposed 40,385 square-foot professional office building,with Waivers of the foundation landscaping requirement and of theCommercial District Development Standards to allow a two story 34-foothigh building where a one-story, 20-foot building is the maximum allowed on1.82 acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commissionand staff recommended approval.




YK




The City Council approved a request for Variance (VAR-10622) for a 70-footsetback where residential adjacency standards require a 105-foot minimumsetback for a proposed professional office building located at 2496 WestCharleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommendedapproval.

11/15/06 The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-16542)for a proposed 21,726 square- foot professional office building on 1.82 acresat 2496 West Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staffrecommended approval.




09/30/08A Building Permit (#26083) was issued for a shell building at 2496 WestCharleston Boulevard. This permit was not finalized and the building wasnever occupied.


03/24/15

Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the applicants required to allow aConvalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home at 2496 West CharlestonBoulevard. It was determined that a General Plan, Zoning and SiteDevelopment Plan Review would be required. No other issues were noted.


06/10/15

Meeting was held at Wasden Elementary School, 2831 Palomino Lane at 5:30 p.m. and ended at 6:00 p.m.

Attendance: 5 – Applicants, 1 – CLV Staff , 6 – Residents

Two main concerns of residents: (1) Rezoning this property to C-1 wouldstart a “domino-effect” leading to other properties along Charleston beingrezoned from C-D to C-1; and (2) Other uses allowed in C-1 which couldoccur should the convalescent care facility move or close.




YK



Field Check

06/04/15

Staff visited the site and found a well maintained vacant office building.There was a lot of mature landscaping around the building and a very wellmaintained parking lot and drive aisle. The inside of the building was never built-out and is incomplete.


Site Area

Net Acres 1.82

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property Office O (Office)C-D (Commercial-

Development)

NorthSingle-Family,

DetachedDR (Desert Rural

Density Residential)R-PD2

South Medical Office O (Office) P-O (Professional Office)

East Medical Office O (Office)C-D (Commercial-

Development)

West

Office O (Office)

R-E (Residence Estates)Single-Family,Detached DR (Desert RuralDensity Residential)




A-O (Airport Overlay) District 175 - Feet Y

Rural Preservation Overlay District Y


Trails N/A

Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area YProject of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Assessment) N/A





YK







Min. Setbacks

Front

Side

Rear



YYY

Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 28 % Y

Max. Building Height 20 Feet 20 Feet Y

Trash EnclosureScreened, Gated, w/

a Roof or Trellis

Screened,Gated, w/a Roof or

Trellis

Y


Pursu

ant to Title 19.08.070, the following standards apply:



Ratio Trees

Buffer Trees: North

South

East

West




YYYY

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 55 Trees 55 Trees Y



12 Trees 12 Trees Y


Min. Zone Width

North South

East

West



YYYY

Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6-Foot Y




YK



Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

SectionCharlestonBoulevard

Primary ArterialPlanned Streets and

Highways Map100 Y


Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

ConvalescentCareFacility/NursingHome

36-Beds 6 Per Bed 6

25-Employees

1 PerEmployee

25

3-MedicalPersonal

3 3



ANALYSIS

The applicant is proposing to locate a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home at 2496 WestCharleston Boulevard. A 21,726 square-foot office building was approved for the site in 2006and construction began in 2008. However, the building was never completed. The applicantwould like to convert this unfinished building into a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home.Although all the exterior hardscape was completed, the applicant is proposing to remove 12 ofthe 18 excess parking spaces on the site and install a landscaped play area for young patients ofthe proposed facility. This area is located in the rear of the building. Other than this change, theonly other visible change to the site would be replacing any dead vegetation, if any, on the site.The remainder of the changes will take place on the interior of the shell building under a tenantimprovement permit.

The project is located with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan – Revitalization Area betweenValley View Boulevard and Rancho Boulevard and is consistent with the purpose and intent ofthe plan. Moreover, this project is located within the Airport Overlay District (A-O) for NorthLas Vegas Airport. The highest point on the office building is 20 feet from elevation where 175feet is the maximum permitted. As such, the existing building conforms to the guidelines for theA-O (Airport Overlay) District.




YK



The project parcel shares property lines with existing adjacent residentially zoned homes at thenorth and west boundaries. The existing building exceeds the required setbacks from existing

homes to the north and west. Therefore the building conforms to the Residential Adjacencyrequirements.

This parcel is currently served by Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) but does not havethe required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for meter sizing, available fire flow, and installation of required backflow prevention.

The property currently has an O (Office) General Plan Land Use designation and an outdated C-D (Designed Commercial) zoning designation. A Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home isnot permitted in such areas. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that the General Plan Land

Use designation be changed to SC (Service Commercial) and the zoning be changed to C-1(Limited Commercial) to allow the proposed use on the site. The property is located onCharleston Boulevard, a Primary Arterial street that is a major east/west connection for thevalley. No other access is available to the site and thus aides in protecting the adjacentresidential properties to the north from any additional traffic this use would generate.

This proposal furthers the City’s established Objective 2.6 of the Neigh borhood RevitalizationSection of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, which states: “To improve the amount and quality

of infill development on vacant and underutilized lands with established areas of the city.”

There was a concern raised by two area residents that although a Convalescent Care

Facility/Nursing Home may be a compatible use, once the property has been rezoned to C-1(Limited Commercial), other uses allowed in the zoning district may not be in the future. Thiscan be addressed with any Site Development Plan Review or Special Use Permit applicationsthat are applied for on the site during the public review process.

This appears to be an ideal location for such a Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home use. Itfurthers established City objectives of developing underutilized and vacant parcels in the urbancore, is located on a Primary Arterial street and is an adaptive re-use of an office building. Forthese reasons, and the overall compatibility with surrounding commercial uses along CharlestonBoulevard, staff recommends approval of the applications.








YK



The proposed amendment is compatible with adjacent land uses and commercial propertiesfound along Charleston Boulevard.



The commercial activities that will be allowed under the proposed amendment are similarto other such used found along this section of West Charleston Boulevard.



Amendment; and

West Charleston Boulevard, a Primary Arterial designated roadway under the Master Planof Streets and Highways map is adequate to address the limited traffic that this amendmentwould allow on the site.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and policies

that include approved neighborhood plans.

With approval of the related zoning application, all other adopted plans and policies aremet with this proposal.




With the approval of the related General Plan Amendment (GPA-59270), this zoningrequest will be in conformance.



The uses allowed in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) district are intended to provide mostretail shopping and personal services and are encouraged to be located on the periphery ofresidential neighborhoods as this project is.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for the





YK



As indicated in the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, underutilized and vacant property in theurban core are to be developed for useful purposes. This project furthers this objective.



The project is located on Charleston Boulevard, a Primary Arterial Street as designed onthe Master Plan of Streets and Highways Map. Vehicular access and circulation willnot adversely affect movements on Charleston Boulevard or neighborhood traffic.





The proposed Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home is compatible with existingadjacent residential and commercial uses.




The proposal would conform to the guidelines of the General Plan Amendment andRezoning requests related with this application; the goals and intent of the Las Vegas 2020Master Plan – Revitalization Area; Title 19; Residential Adjacency Standards; and AirportOverlay District requirements.



The project is located on Charleston Boulevard, a Primary Arterial Street as designed on

the Master Plan of Streets and Highways Map. Vehicular access and circulation will notadversely affect movements on Charleston Boulevard or neighborhood traffic.


The exterior of the existing building and landscape materials will not be affected by thisrequest and are appropriate for the area.




YK





orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and compatiblewith development in the area;

The contemporary architectural design of the existing building is aesthetically compatiblewith development in the area.


general welfare.

No detrimental effects to human health and public safety will result with this proposal.


NOTICES MAILED 147 - GPA-59270 and ZON-59271147 - TMP-59532

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 1 - GPA-59270 and ZON-592711 - TMP-59532



ｘ″゜ｘ

゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㄦｘธ

GPA-59270



ｘ″゜ｘ

゜

ㄦ


GPA-59270




О AՁḶҜ●ЌḶ ՁЌ

AƆĠԱ AЋǲ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ╗ Ձ A Ќ Ｃ Ő

Ｃ

A Ġ Ձ

A Ќ

Ｃ Ő

Ɔ ╗

Ő Ḷ Ќ Ḛ

Ｃ Ő

Ő A Ќ Ġ Ḷ

Ձ Ќ

Ա Ⓢ

ǲ Ġ

Ձ ǲ

Ő

Ｃ Ő

ƆĠǲŐҜAЌ ОՁ

Û ǲ

Ɔ ╗ Ձ

Ⓢ Ќ

ＣＣ

Ő

╗ Ő

Ḷ ╗

╗ ǲ

Ő

● Ő


Ｃ

Ɔ Ő A Ќ Ġ

Ḷ

Ｃ Ő

Û ĠAŐՁǲƆ╗ḶЌ ԱՁЋＣ

ḚОA

ㄦɱธՙｘ

㌫ŐḶҜ Ḷ ╗Ḷ Ɔ

ＣŴ Ҝਙ₡Ŵⓒ ҜŴ ฎⓒ ธｘ

Ḛ●Ɔ こŴऑ Ŵผ ਙผこŴкк ऑผਙ₡ਙк ਙ こ γ ₡ ਙ⑾ γ





Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ Aこ ₡こ ש

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ɔ Ɔ ผٹ

ħ㌱ ਙここ

ผ㌱ħŴк


Ҝ Ҝ ₡ħこ

Ġ Ġħفγ

ҜՁA Ҝ

₡ħこ Ձਙʉ A Ŵ㌱γ ₡


ОＣ ОкŴ ₡ ਙここħ Ｃ ٹ

кਙऑこ

ОŐ ḶƆ ОŴผ Ő ㌱ผ Ŵ ħਙ゜ Ḷऑ ƆऑŴ㌱


ՁЋҜＣ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Ҝ ₡ħ㌱ŴкفＣħ

ผħ㌱

Ḛ╗ ╗ਙผħ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ

Ő Ő ਙผ㌱ ਙ ผٹŴ ħਙ

Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ҜṲⓈ Ｃਙʉ

ਙʉ Ҝħゥ

₡ Ⓢ

╗ЌＣ ╗ผŴ₡ħਙŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

О О⇡кħ㌱ Ŵ㌱ħкħ кŴผ ਙ

ŐЌО ŐผŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ Оผ

ผ Ŵ ħਙٹ



Ő ŐผŴк

Ձ Ձਙʉ

ҜՁ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡ ㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

Ɔ

Ќ Ḛ

Ｃ

Ա Ⓢ

ǲ

Ձ

Ｃ

Ձ● ゜ Ձħفγ ● ₡ ħ к ゜ γ

О Ｃ

Ок ₡ ここ ħ Ｃ ٹ

к こ

О ОŴผ ゜ Ŵ ħਙ ゜ ऑ ㌱

О

О к ħ ħ кħ

ՁЋ ҜＣ

Ձ Ћ Ŵ Ҝف ħ㌱ŴкＣħ

ผħ㌱

ħħħħħ ħħħħħ ккккк

ʉ

Ｃ ʉ ʉ

ҜṲ Ｃ ʉ

ЌＣ

ผŴ ħਙ кＣ ٹ к こ

О О ⇡ккħħ ккккŴผ ਙ

ｘ″゜ｘ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎㄦｘธ

GPA-59270



Ｃ

Ｃ

Ｃ

Ｃ

Ｃ

Ｃ

Ｃ

Ｃ

Ő ǲ ㈠

Ő ǲ ㈠

Ő ǲ ㈠

Ő ǲ ㈠

A

Ա

Ｃ

Ġ

İ

Ձ

ธ

ㅡ

ㄦ

″

ՙ

A ″ ㈠ｘ

A ″ ㈠ｘ ㅡ

A ″ ㈠ｘ

ธ

A ″ ㈠ｘ

ฎ ㄦ ƥ ｘ फ

ธ ՙ ｘ ƥ

ｘ फ

Ձ Ḷ Ա Ա

ｘｘ

Ｃ A Ɔ О A ǲ

ｘｘ ธ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

ｘｘ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

ｘｘ ㅡ

İ A Ќ ㈠

ｘｘㄦ Ɔ

ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘｘｘ ″

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘｘ ՙ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ธ

ｘｘ ฎ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘｘ ɱ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ

ｘ

ｘ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ㅡ

ｘ

ธ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘㄦ

ｘ

ㅡ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ

ㄦ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ″

ｘ

″

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ

ՙ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ՙ

ｘ

ฎ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ

ɱ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ

●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ฎ

ｘ ธ ｘ ╗

Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ธ

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ｘ ธ ธ

Ḷ Ő Ő ● Ｃ Ḷ Ő

ｘ ธ


ｘ ธ ㅡ


ｘ ธ ㄦ

Ḷ

● ǲ

ｘ ธ ″

A Ќ ╗ ǲ

ｘ ธ ՙ О

Ő ● Ћ A

╗ ǲ ゜

● Ɔ Ḷ Ձ A

╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ｘｘ ธ ฎ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ธ ɱ

A Ќ ╗ ǲ

ｘｘ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ ゜

● Ɔ Ḷ Ձ A ╗ ● Ḷ Ќ

ｘ ธ

ｘ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ธ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

ｘ

Ќ Ḷ Ⓢ Ő ● Ɔ Ġ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗

ｘ ㅡ Ɔ

╗ A

Ձ Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ Ḛ ǲ

ｘㄦ

Ɔ ╗ A

Ձ Ḷ ǲ Ő Ɔ

ｘ ″

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ՙ

A Ձ Ḷ Ћ ǲ

ｘ ฎ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ɱ

ｘ ɱ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ㅡ ｘ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ

ｘ ㅡ

Ќ Ⓢ Ő Ɔ ǲ

ｘ ㅡ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ㅡ ㅡ

A Ձ Ḷ Ћ ǲ

ｘ ㅡ ㄦ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ｘ ㅡ ″

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ㅡ ՙ

Ձ ǲ A Ќ

ｘ ㅡ ฎ

Ɔ Ḷ ● Ձ ǲ Ｃ

ｘ ㅡ ɱ

Ա Ő ǲ A

ｘㄦｘ

Ḷ Ќ ǲ Ő ǲ Ќ ǲ

ｘㄦ

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ｘㄦ ธ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘㄦ

Ќ Ḷ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘㄦ ㅡ

ǲ Ḷ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘㄦㄦ

Ɔ ╗ A ╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

ｘㄦ ″

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗ ㈠

Û Ḷ Ő

ｘㄦ ՙ

Ġ A Ձ Ձ

ｘㄦ ฎ

A Ձ Ḷ Ћ ǲ

ｘㄦ ɱ

● ㈠ ╗ ㈠゜ Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ ㈠

ｘ ″ ｘ

Ｃ ● Ќ Ќ ● Ќ Ḛ

ｘ ″

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ｘ ″ ธ

Û A ● ╗ ● Ќ Ḛ

ｘ ″

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘ ″ ㅡ

A Ɔ Ɔ ● Ɔ ╗

㈠

Û Ḷ Ő

ｘ ″ ㄦ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘ ″ ″

Ɔ ǲ Ő Ћ ● Ќ Ḛ

ｘ ″ ՙ

A Ő ╗

ｘ ″ ฎ

● ╗ Ġ ǲ Ќ

ｘ ″ ɱ

О Ő ǲ О ㈠

ｘ ՙ ｘ

Ḷ Ḷ Ձ ǲ Ő

ｘ ՙ ธ

Ő ǲ ǲ Ύ ǲ Ő

ｘ ՙ

Ձ ǲ A Ќ

ｘ ՙ ㅡ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘ ՙ ㄦ

Ҝ ǲ Ｃ㈠ О Ő ǲ О ㈠

ｘ ՙ ″

Ќ Ḷ Ⓢ Ő ● Ɔ Ġ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗

ｘ ՙ ՙ

A Ձ Ḷ Ћ ǲ

ｘ ՙ ฎ

Ќ Ⓢ Ő Ɔ ǲ

ｘ ՙ ɱ


ｘ ฎ ｘ

Ɔ ╗ A ╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

ｘ ฎ

● Ќ A Ќ ╗

Ա A ╗ Ġ ㈠

ｘ ฎ ธ

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ｘ ฎ

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

╗ Ġ ǲ Ő A О

ｘ ฎ ㅡ

Ɔ О ǲ ǲ Ġ

╗ Ġ ǲ Ő A О

ｘ ฎ ㄦ

╗ Ġ ǲ Ő A О ● Ɔ ╗ Ɔ

Û Ḷ Ő

ｘ ฎ ″

О Ġ

Ɔ ● A Ձ

╗ Ġ ǲ

Ő A О

A Ő ǲ

A

ｘ ฎ ՙ


ｘ ฎ ฎ

İ A Ќ ㈠

ｘ ฎ ɱ

Ｃ Ő Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ｘ ɱ ｘ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘ

ɱ

Ḷ ● ǲ

ｘ ɱ ธ

ǲ Ợ Ⓢ ● О Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ｘ ɱ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ɱ ㅡ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ｘ ɱ ㄦ


ｘ ɱ ″


Ġ Ḷ Ձ Ｃ ● Ќ Ḛ

ｘ ɱ ՙ

Ҝ ǲ Ｃ㈠ Ḛ A Ɔ

ｘ ɱ ฎ

Ҝ ǲ Ġ A Ќ ● A Ձ

ｘ ɱ ɱ

ǲ Ձ ǲ ╗ Ő ● A Ձ

ｘｘ

Ћ ǲ Ɔ ╗ ㈠

ｘ

İ A Ќ ㈠

ｘ ธ

Ő ● Ɔ ǲ Ő

ｘ

Ҝ A ╗ ǲ Ő ● A Ձ

Ҝ A Ќ A Ḛ ǲ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗

ｘ ㅡ

Ҝ A ╗ ǲ Ő ● A Ձ

Ҝ A Ќ A Ḛ ǲ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő A Ḛ ǲ

ｘㄦ

Ҝ A ● Ќ ╗ ǲ Ќ A Ќ ǲ

Ɔ Ġ Ḷ О

ｘ ″

Ġ A Ձ Ձ

ｘ ՙ


ｘ ฎ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ธ ｘ ɱ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő

㈠

ｘ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ธ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ㅡ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ㅡ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ㄦㄦ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

″

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

″ ՙ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠゜

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ฎ

Ɔ ǲ Ҝ ●

О Ő ● Ћ A ╗ ǲ

ՙ ɱ

╗ Ձ ╗ ㈠

Ɔ Ġ Û Ő ㈠

ธ ｘ

Ɔ ╗ Ḷ Ő ㈠

ธ

Ｃ A Ɔ О A ǲ

ธ ธ

Ő ǲ ǲ О ╗ ㈠

ธ

Û A Ɔ Ġ

ՙ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗

İ Ḷ Ա

Ќ Ḷ ㈠

Ｃ A ╗ ǲ

Ɔ Ġ ǲ ǲ ╗ Ḷ Ќ ╗ ǲ Ќ ╗ Ɔ

О Ő Ḷ İ ǲ ╗

Ḷ Ќ Ɔ Ⓢ Ձ ╗ A Ќ ╗ Ɔ

Ő ǲ Ћ ● Ɔ ● Ḷ Ќ Ɔ

ɱ ｘ ՙ ㄦ Û Ｃ ħ Ŵ ⇡ к ਙ Ｃ ผ ħ ⓒ ╗ γ ħ ผ ₡ к ਙ ਙ ผ

Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ ⓒ Ќ Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ฎ ɱ ㅡ ฎ

ՙ ｘ ธ ㈠ ″ ՙ ㈠ ″ ɱ ｘｘ

ՙ ｘＣ ħ ผ ㌱ ਙ ผ Ա ਙ к Ŵ ผ ₡ ⓒ Ɔ ħ ՙ ՙ ｘں

A ħ ⓒ ╗ ゥ Ŵ ՙ ฎ ՙ ㅡ ㅡ

ㄦ ธ ㈠ ㅡ ㅡ ㈠ ฎ ธ ｘｘ

Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ A Ⓢ Ɔ ╗ ● Ќ

ʉ ʉ ʉ ㈠ Ḛ A Ŵ ผ ㌱ γ ħ ㌱ ผ ㈠㌱ ਙ こ

A

㈠ｘ

ㄦ ธ ㄦ ธ ㈠ｘｘ

Ҝ A ｘㄦ ⓒ ธ ｘ

ㄦ

Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő О Ձ A Ќ

О ǲ Ｃ ● A ╗ Ő ● Ќ Ⓢ Ő Ɔ ● Ќ Ḛ

A ● Ձ ● ╗

О ǲ Ｃ ● A ╗ Ő ● Ќ Ⓢ Ő Ɔ ● Ќ Ḛ A ● Ձ ● ╗ Ձ Ŵ Ћ Ŵ ⓒ Ќ Ŵ ₡ Ŵ

Ɔ A Ձ ǲ

゜ ธ फ ए

ƥ ｘ फ

О Ő Ḷ О Ḷ Ɔ ǲ Ｃ

Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő

О Ձ A Ќ

ｘ ″ ゜ｘ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ㄦｘ ธ

G P A - 5 9 2 7 0

, Z O N - 5 9 2 7 1 a n

d S D R - 5 9 2 7 2



G P A - 5 9 2 7 0 [ P R J - 5

8 5 0 2 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 5 9 2 7 1 A N D S

D R - 5 9 2 7 2 -

A P P L I C A N T : P O S I T I V E L Y K I D S - O W N E R :

S W A N F O U N D A T I O N , L L C

2 4 9 6 W E S T C H A R L E S T O N B O U L E V A R D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



A Ő Ġ ● ╗ ǲ ╗ Ⓢ Ő ǲ ḶⓈЌＣ●ЌḚ ОAŐ╗ЌǲŐƆǲ₡ ħ ผ кк İผ㈠ⓒ A●AḚ ਙผف ㈠ ḚŴผкਙ㌱ⓒ A●A

ОAŐ╗ЌǲŐƆＣŴ

ٹ

ħ₡ О㈠ Աผਙこⓒ A●A İŴこ

㈠ Ձਙผ₡ ●●ⓒ A●AŐħ㌱ Őਙこħ

ਙ

ƆǲЌ●ḶŐ AƆƆḶ●A╗ǲƆՁ

Ќਙผʉਙผ

γ ⓒ A●A

AƆƆḶ●A╗ǲƆҜŴผ ＣŴк ⓒ A●AผŴħف Ő㈠ ਙผผ ⓒ A●Aⓒ ՁǲǲＣ AОՁこŴ İŴ⑾⑾Ŵผⓒ A●Aⓒ ՁǲǲＣ AО

ՁŴ Ћ

Ŵ

Ｃħผ ㌱ ਙผ Աਙкںՙｘں Ŵผ₡ⓒ Ɔħٹ ՙՙｘ A ħⓒ ╗ ゥŴ ՙฎՙㅡㅡں ｘｘɱ

ㄦںธ㈠ㅡㅡں ㈠ฎธｘｘ

ɱｘՙㄦ Û ＣħŴ⇡кਙ Ｃผħٹ ⓒ ╗γħผ₡ кਙਙผՁŴ Ћ Ŵⓒ Ќف ㅡฎںŴ₡Ŵ ฎɱٹ ՙ″ｘㅡՙｘธ㈠″ՙ㈠″ɱｘｘ

ʉʉʉ㈠

ŴŴผ㌱γħ ש

㌱ש

ผ

㈠㌱ਙこ

Ŵ

ħ

AḚㅡｘ

Ŵผ ਙ⑾ ǲゥ㌱

кк

㌱

ɱՙㄦ ธｘ

ㄦ

ҜŴ ㄦⓒ ธｘںㄦ

ħ ਙ⑾ ՁŴ Ћ فŴ Ｃ ऑŴผ こ ਙ⑾ ОкŴħف

Ќਙผ γ ŐŴ㌱γਙ Ｃผħٹ

ՁŴ Ћ Ŵⓒ Ќف ″ｘںŴ₡Ŵ ฎɱٹ

A

ОкŴħ

ف

Ɔ

Ŵ⑾⑾

Ő

Оਙħ

ħٹ

к ħ₡

╗ਙ ʉγਙこ ħ

こŴ ㌱ਙ㌱

ผ

Ок

Ŵ

Ŵ㌱㌱

ऑ

γħ ₡ਙ㌱こ

Ŵ γ

㈾

ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ

ħਙ к

ผ ⑾ਙผ γ

Ŵ⇡ਙٹ

ผ

⑾

ผ

㌱

₡ ऑผਙ㈾

㌱

㈠ Û

Ŵผ

ผ ׀

ħف

Ŵ

Ɔħ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ ОкŴ Ő ħ ʉⓒ Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ Aこ ₡こ ٹ Ŵ₡ Ύਙ γŴف ⑾ਙผ γħ ऑผਙ㈾㌱ кਙ㌱Ŵ ₡ Ŵ ธㅡɱ″

Û γŴผк ਙ Աਙк Ŵผ₡㈠ ╗γ ऑผਙ㈾㌱ٹ ħ ħ ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ к ㈠ฎธ Ŵ㌱ผ Ŵ₡ γں A ਙผɸ ОŴผ㌱ к Ќこ⇡ ผħ

ں

ɱ ธ ฎｘธ ｘ″㈠

╗γ ऑผਙऑਙ ₡ ऑผਙ㈾㌱㌱ਙħ ਙ⑾ Ŵ ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ к ธธⓒธɱㅡ Ɔ㈠㈠ О ₡ħŴ ผħ㌱ Ќผħف Ŵ㌱ħкħ ╗ Ŵ

●こऑผਙٹ こ ħ Ŵ ゥħ ħف γ кк ⇡ħк₡ħف㈠ A こ⇡ ผ ਙ⑾ ʉħ₡ਙʉ Ŵผ ⇡ ħف ผ ħ▷ ₡ ਙ こ㌱ਙ₡ ⑾ਙผ γħ

Ŵ γਙʉ ਙ γ

ゥ

ผħਙผ к ٹ

Ŵ

ħਙ㈠ A ㌱

ผ

Ŵħ こ⇡

ผ ਙ⑾ γ

ゥħ

ħف

ゥ

ผħਙผ ₡ਙਙผ Ŵผ

⇡

ħف

ผ

ħ▷

₡ ਙ ⑾ਙผ

⑾ ʉħ₡ ㈠ Aкк ゥ ผħਙผ ⑾ħħγ Ŵ⑾⑾ ㌱ ₡ ⇡ γ ゥ ผħਙผ ㌱γŴف ʉħкк ⇡ ผ ⑾ħħγ ₡ ਙ こŴ ㌱γ ゥħ ħف㈠

╗ʉਙ ゥħ ħف ऑŴผħف ऑŴ㌱ Ŵผ ⇡ ħف ผ こਙٹ ₡ ⑾ਙผ γ Ŵ₡₡ħ ħਙ ਙ⑾ Ŵ こ ผ ف ㌱ ⇡Ŵ㌱ ऑ ف ผŴ ਙผ㈠ ╗γ

㌱ผ

ʉŴкк ⑾ਙผ γ ف

ผŴ

ਙผ ʉħкк ⇡

㌱㌱ਙ ਙ こŴ

㌱γ γ

ゥħ

ħف

ผŴγ ㌱кਙผ

㈠ ╗γ ف

ผŴ

ਙผ ʉħкк ⇡

ผ ਙ

Ŵ こਙ

γк ⇡Ŵħ ⑾ਙผ Ŵ γਙผ

ऑ

ผħਙ₡ ਙ⑾ ħこ

ਙٹ

ผħ⑾ γ

こ ħ ʉਙผħف

㌱ਙผผ

㌱

к㈠ ╗γ

ゥऑ

㌱

₡ ਙħ

к ٹ

к

ਙ⑾ γ ف ผŴ ਙผ ħ ″ㄦ₡Ա㈠

Ɔγਙк₡ ਙ γŴٹ

Ŵ׀

ħਙ ผ ف

Ŵผ₡ħف

γħ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ

ħਙⓒ ऑк

Ŵ

⑾

к ⑾ผ

ਙ ㌱ਙ

Ŵ㌱

ਙผ ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱

㈠

Ɔħ㌱

ผ

кⓒ

ผŴħف

Ձ㌱Ŵⓒ A●A

Aผ㌱γħ ㌱

ںՙｘں Ｃħผ ਙผ Ա к Ŵผ ⓒٹ ħⓒ ゥŴ

ㄦںธ㈠

ｘ″゜ｘ

゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎㄦｘธGPA-59270, ZON-59271 and SDR-59272






DIRECTOR: TOM PERRIGO, ACTING Consent Discussion

SUBJECT:ZON-59271 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59270 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:POSITIVELY KIDS - OWNER: SWAN FOUNDATION, LLC - For possible action on arequest for Rezoning FROM: C-D (DESIGNED COMMERCIAL) TO: C-1 (LIMITEDCOMMERCIAL) on 1.82 acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-036),Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58502]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:







paper use, backup










ｘ″゜ｘ

゜

ㄦ


ZON-59271




ОAՁḶҜ●ЌḶ ՁЌ

AƆĠԱ AЋǲ


Ｃ

A

Ġ Ձ

A Ќ

Ｃ Ő

Ɔ ╗

Ő Ḷ Ќ Ḛ

Ｃ Ő

Ő A Ќ Ġ Ḷ

Ձ Ќ

Ա Ⓢ

ǲ Ġ

Ձ ǲ

Ő

Ｃ Ő

ƆĠǲŐҜAЌ ОՁ

Û ǲ

Ɔ ╗ Ձ

Ⓢ Ќ

ＣＣ

Ő

╗ Ő

Ḷ ╗

╗ ǲ

Ő

● Ő


Ｃ

Ɔ Ő A

Ќ Ġ

Ḷ

Ｃ Ő

Û ĠAŐՁǲƆ╗ḶЌ ԱՁЋＣ

ΎḶЌ

ㄦɱธՙ

㌫ŐḶҜ Ｃ ╗Ḷ

ＣŴ Ҝਙ₡Ŵⓒ ҜŴ ฎⓒ ธｘ






ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

ΎਙħفŐ ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ Ｃ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк





Ő ҜĠО Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ҝਙ⇡ħк ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ ОŴผ




Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱






Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱




╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ


Ⓢ ӧḚО A Ｃ ħفŴ ħਙỏ Ⓢ₡ ٹ кਙऑ ₡






Ձਙ

Ɔ

Ќ Ḛ

Ｃ

Ա Ⓢ

ǲ

Ձ

Ｃ

О Оผਙ⑾ ħਙ Ŵк ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ќ Ɔ

Ќ ħفγ⇡ ผγਙ ₡ Ɔ ผٹħ

⑾⑾ħ

ħف ₡ ħŴк

Ձħこħ ₡ ここ ħŴк

Ŵк ħŴк

ОԱ

ОкŴ ₡ Ա ħ О

Ҝ

ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк゜

Ҝ

● ผħŴк

Ћ

ħٹħ

О ОкŴ ₡

╗ Ｃ

╗ Ŵ₡ħ ħਙ Ŵк Ｃ

О ОкŴ ₡ ٹ

ʉ

ｘ″゜ｘ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎㄦｘธ

ZON-59271







SUBJECT:SDR-59272 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-59270 AND ZON-59271 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: POSITIVELY KIDS - OWNER: SWANFOUNDATION, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan ReviewFOR A PROPOSED 36-BED CONVALESCENT CARE FACILITY/NURSING HOME on 1.82acres at 2496 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 139-32-802-036), C-D (Commercial-Development) Zone [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-58502]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015






2. Location and Aerial Maps3. Supporting Documentation





paper use, backup










ｘ″゜ｘ

゜

ㄦ


SDR-59272







SUBJECT:GPA-59527 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:ADAVEN HOMES - OWNER: DECISIVE PURSUIT, LLC - For possible action on a requestfor a General Plan Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO:R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.00 acres at 9704 West Alexander Road (APN 138-06-401-006), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59467]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 [PRJ-59467]3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 [PRJ-59467]

4. Photo(s) - GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 [PRJ-59467]5. Justification Letter - GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 [PRJ-59467]6. Protest Letter - GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 [PRJ-59467]



GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 [PRJ-59467]

JB




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ADAVEN HOMES - OWNER: DECISIVE

PURSUIT, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL



TMP-59532 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-59527ZON-59529

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map isnot recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map with four (4)years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City’s Street Naming Regulationsand United States Postal Service.





JB

Conditions Page Two



or conveyance of any unit within the community, the Developer is required to record aDeclaration of Private Maintenance Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all

associated properties, and on behalf of all current and future property owners. The DPMRis to include a listing of all privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements,along with assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interestcommunity or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a briefdescription of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. TheDPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of FieldOperations prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within thecommunity are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private maintenanceobligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to provide for said

maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of obligation of compliance withthe DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recordedDPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State SubdivisionStatutes.

Public Works

6. Dedicate 50 feet of right-of-way for Alexander Road and 40 feet of right-of-way for GrandCanyon Drive including a 35-foot radius and Traffic Chord Easement at the northeast

corner of Alexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive per standard drawing 201.3.S1adjacent to this site concurrent with the Final Map for this site. Additionally, grant a15-foot Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail Easement adjacent to Alexander Road concurrentwith the Final Map for this site.

7. Construct all incomplete half-street improvements on Alexander Road including therequired Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail and construct half street improvements on GrandCanyon Drive including appropriate over paving, where legally able, meeting current CityStandards adjacent to this site concurrent with onsite development activities. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original locationand to its original width concurrent with development of this site.

8. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public UtilityEasements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements with privatemaintenance by the Homeowner's Association.

9. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscapingand private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so asto not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development accessdrives and abutting street intersections.




JB



10. Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in theAlexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive public rights-of-way prior to this issuance of

permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the termof the Encroachment Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insuredentity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to theterms of the City's Encroachment Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for the entire termof the Encroachment Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the EncroachmentAgreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and Safety(229-4836).

11. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved by theDepartment of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits,submittal of any construction drawings or the submittal of a Map subdividing this site,whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in theapproved drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to constructsuch neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by theCity of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Studyconcurrent with development of this site.

12. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map is inconcept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type and/or

alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and drainageimprovements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans by the City. Nodeviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless specific written approvalfor such is received from the City Engineer prior to the recordation of a Final Map or theapproval of subdivision-related construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval ofthis Tentative Map does not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of suchdeviations.




JB



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-59527) from DR (Desert Rural DensityResidential) to R (Rural Density Residential); and Rezoning (ZON-59529) from R-PD2(Residential Planned Development – 2 Units per Acre) zone to R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) on approximately 5.00 acres located on the northwest corner of Alexander Road andGrand Canyon Drive. The applicant has proposed to develop the subject site into a gatedresidential subdivision containing 12 single-family units, which requires the submittal of anassociated Tentative Map (TMP-59532). As the development conforms to the DevelopmentStandards outlined in Title 19 including perimeter buffer and connectivity standards, staff

recommends approval of the associated General Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Tentative Maprequests, with conditions.

ISSUES

Access to the subdivision will be from Grand Canyon Drive, an 80-Foot Major Collector asdesignated by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.



11/21/01

The City Council approved a request for an Annexation [A-0006-99(A)]application, which petitioned to annex property generally located at thenorthwest corner of Alexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive. The PlanningCommission recommended approval. The annexation became effective on11/30/01.

03/02/05

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-5796) fromU(Undeveloped) [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) General Plandesignation] to R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 units per acre)on 5.0 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Grand Canyon Drive and

Alexander Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approvalof the request.

03/02/05

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review(SDR-5797) for a proposed nine lot single-family residential development on5.0 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Grand Canyon Drive andAlexander Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approvalof the request.




JB




05/12/05

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-6416) for a nine-lot single-family residential subdivision on 5.0 acres adjacentto the northwest corner of Alexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive. Staffrecommended approval of the request.

11/07/07

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-24252) from U

(Undeveloped) [DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) Master Plan

Designation] to: R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units per

Acre) on 5.0 acres adjacent to the northwest corner of Alexander Road and

Grand Canyon Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended

approval of the request.

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review(SDR-24253) for a nine-lot single-family residential development on 5.0 acres

adjacent to the northwest corner of Alexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive.

The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.

12/20/07

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-

25273) for a nine-lot single-family residential subdivision on 5.0 acres at the

northwest corner of Alexander Road and Grand Canyon Drive. Staff

recommended approval of the request.




04/30/15A building permit (#286364) was issued for a off-premise monument sign at

9704 West Alexander Road. The permit has not been finalized.


05/27/15

A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over theapplication materials and submittal requirements for a General PlanAmendment, Rezoning and Tentative Map for a proposed 12-unit single-family residential subdivision.




JB




06/16/15

A neighborhood meeting was held at the location of 3521 North Durango

Drive, Room #C at 6:00pm to discuss the proposed General Plan Amendment,Rezoning and Tentative Map for a proposed 12-unit single-family residentialsubdivision at 9704 West Alexander Road, Assessor’s Parcel 138-06-401-006. There were three members of the public, four member of thedevelopment team and one Planning staff member in attendance of themeeting.

The following concerns were expressed at the meeting:

The proposed General Plan Land Use designation of R (Rural DensityResidential) can allow up to 3.49 dwelling units per acre, which is toodense for the area. The neighborhood is in support of this project, as it

is only proposing 2.4 units per acre but worry about futuredevelopment in the area being allowed up to 3.49 units per acre.

Would like to see staff impose a condition of approval limiting the siteto 12 units.

Citizens of the area would prefer single-story houses to be constructedon the site.

Citizens were in favor of the proposed streetscape improvements

Field Check

06/04/15 Description


Site Area

Net Acres 5.00

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject Property UndevelopedDR (Desert Rural


R-PD2 (ResidentialPlanned Development – 2

Units per Acre)

North Undeveloped

RNP (Rural Neighborhood

Preservation) – ClarkCounty

R-E (Rural EstatesResidential) – Clark

County

SouthSingle Family

Detached, DwellingsL (Low Density

Residential)R-CL (Single Family

Compact-Lot)




JB



Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


East

UndevelopedR (Rural Density

Residential)

U (Undeveloped) Zone [R(Rural DensityResidential)]

UndevelopedR (Rural Density

Residential)

U (Undeveloped) Zone[RNP (Rural

NeighborhoodPreservation)]

WestSingle Family

Detached, DwellingsRL (Residential Low) –

Clark County

R-E (Rural EstatesResidential) – Clark

County






Trails Y





Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

R-PD2 (Residential PlannedDevelopment – 2 Units per

Acre)2.00 du/ac 10

Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

R-D (Single Family

Residential-Restricted) N/A N/A

Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed

DR (Desert Rural DensityResidential)

2.49 du/ac 12

Proposed General Plan R (Rural Density Residential) 3.59 du/ac 17




JB




Min. Setbacks:

Front 25 Feet 25 Feet Y

Side (interior) 5 Feet 5 Feet Y

Side (corner) 15 Feet 15 Feet Y

Rear 30 Feet 30 Feet Y

Maximum Height 30 Feet N/A N/A

Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Alexander Road Primary Arterial

Master Plan of Streets

and Highways 100 Y

Grand Canyon Drive Major CollectorMaster Plan of Streets

and Highways80 Y

19.04.040 Connectivity

Transportation Network Element # Links # Nodes

Internal Street 3

Intersection – Internal 3

Cul-de-sac Terminus

Intersection – External Street or Stub Terminus

Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn AroundEasements

Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted (2 x 0.5)

Total 4 3

Required Provided

Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): 1.30 1.33


Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Single Family,Detached

12 du2 spaces per du

24






JB



ANALYSIS

This is a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-59527) from DR (Desert Rural DensityResidential) to R (Rural Density Residential); and Rezoning (ZON-59529) from R-PD2(Residential Planned Development – 2 Units per Acre) zone to R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) on approximately 5.00 acres located on the northwest corner of Alexander Road andGrand Canyon Drive. The applicant has proposed to develop the subject site into a gatedresidential subdivision containing 12 single-family units, which requires the submittal of anassociated Tentative Map (TMP-59532).

The subject site is located within Centennial Hills Sector Plan area. The applicant has proposedto develop the subject site into a gated residential subdivision containing 12 units. The proposeddensity of 2.40 dwelling units per gross acre falls well within the newly proposed R (Rural

Density Residential) general plan designation which will allow for up to 3.59 dwelling units peracre. The development complies with all Title 19.04 development standards and has aConnectivity Score of 1.33 that also complies with Title 19.04.

The proposed lots range in size from 10,038 square feet to 18,048 square feet. Site access is proposed from Grand Canyon Drive by way of a 59-foot private street that will serve this site.Interior circulation is provided by 47-foot wide private streets with five-foot sidewalks and L-curbs on both sides of the street which comply with Title 19.04 development standards. Also, theapplicant has provided the required 20-foot multi-use trail adjacent to the site along AlexanderRoad. Two pedestrian access connections have been provided along the eastern and southern perimeter of the subdivision. No neighborhood parks are proposed.

The submitted north/south cross section show a maximum natural grade greater than 2% acrossthis site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope greaterthan 2%, is allowed a maximum 6-foot retaining wall. A 4-foot retaining wall is shown on thenorth property line and a 2-foot retaining wall is shown on the south property line. The submittedeast/west cross section show a maximum natural grade greater than 2% across this site. Per theTables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural slope greater than 2%, isallowed a maximum 6-foot retaining wall. A 3-foot retaining wall is shown on the east propertyline and no retaining wall is shown on the west property line. In addition, the perimeter walls aredesigned in accordance with 19.06 requirements with 20% contrasting materials and decorativecaps.

The Clark County School District projects that approximately five (5) primary and secondaryschool students would be generated by the proposed development on this site. Of the threeschools serving the area (Tarr Elementary School, Leavitt Middle School and Centennial HighSchool), the District notes that only Centennial High School was not over capacity for the 2014-15 school year, and no new schools are planned in this area at this time.




JB







The proposed R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan designation is consistent withthe adjacent single-family residential land uses surrounding the subject site.



The applicant has proposed a Rezoning (ZON-59529) from R-PD2 (Residential PlannedDevelopment – 2 Units per Acre) zone to R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted)on the subject site, which is consistent with the proposed R (Rural Density Residential)General Plan designation.



Amendment; and

There are adequate transportation and recreation facilities in within close proximity to the

subject site to accommodate the proposed single-family, detached land use.



All applicable plans and policies are met with the proposed amendment.


In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning

Commission or City Council must affirm the following:


The proposed Rezoning from R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development – 2 Units perAcre) Zone to R-D (Single Family Residential, Restricted) is in conformance with the R(Rural Density Residential) designation under the Centennial Hills Sector Plan of theGeneral Plan.




JB





The applicant has proposed to develop the site into a 12-unit single-family residentialsubdivision which is a permitted land use within the proposed R-D (Single FamilyResidential, Restricted) zoning designation.



The proposed R-D (Single Family Residential, Restricted) is an appropriate zoningdesignation, which will allow conformance with the proposed R (Rural DensityResidential) designation within the Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the General Plan.



Primary site access is from Grand Canyon Drive, an 80-foot Major Collector, which provides adequate capacity to serve the proposed use.


The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes and Title 19. Therefore, staff

recommends approval with conditions.


NOTICES MAILED 215 - GPA-59527 and ZON-59529215 - TMP-59532

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱㅡ″ՙ

GPA-59527



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


GPA-59527



ƆⓈԱİǲ╗ОŐḶОǲŐ╗

Ќ İ ǲ Ќ Ɔ ǲ Ќ Ɔ ╗

Û●ЌＣḶҜ ОḶ●Ќ ╗ A Ћǲ

Ḷ Ṳ ḶŐǲƆ ╗ A Ћǲ

Ġ●AҜ A Ћǲ

Ћ ● A Ҝ

Ḷ Ќ

╗ A Ḛ Ќ A Ɔ

╗

ĠǲŐŐ AЌ ḶЌ A Ћǲ

Ҝ A Ő Ա Ձ ǲ

Ҝ Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ ╗ A ● Ќ

Ɔ ╗

Ќ A Ő Ő Ḷ Û

A Ќ Ḷ

Ќ Ɔ ╗

Ḛ Ő A Ќ Ｃ Ҝ ǲ A Ｃ Ḷ Û Ɔ ╗

ƆḶՁ●╗AŐ●A ＣŐ

ҜA ÛḶḶＣ ╗

Ա Ő Ḷ A Ｃ Ҝ ǲ A Ｃ Ḷ Û ╗

Ġ A Ҝ О ╗ Ḷ Ќ

Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ћ ǲ

╗

ҜAŐԱՁǲ ОǲA ╗

Û AՁǲ Ṳ AЌＣǲŐ ŐＣ

Ќ

Ḛ Ő A Ќ Ｃ

A Ќ

Ḷ

Ќ

Ｃ Ő

ḚОA

ㄦɱㄦธՙ

㌫ŐḶҜ ＣŐ ╗Ḷ Ő

ＣŴ Ҝਙ₡Ŵⓒ İ ｘฎⓒ ｘ





ՙｘธ ธธɱ ″ ｘں

ผŴк ОкŴAこ ₡こ ש

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ɔ Ɔ ผٹħ㌱ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк


Ҝ Ҝ

₡ħこ

Ġ Ġħفγ

ҜՁA Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ A Ŵ㌱γ ₡

Ձ●゜Ő Ձħفγ ●₡ ผħŴк Ő Ŵผ㌱γ


кਙऑこ

ОŐ ḶƆ ОŴผ゜Ő ㌱ผ

Ŵ ħਙ゜ Ḷऑ ƆऑŴ㌱


ՁЋҜＣ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Ҝ ₡ħ㌱ŴкفＣħ ผħ㌱


╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ


Ｃਙʉ

ਙʉ ਙここ

ผ㌱ħŴк

ҜṲⓈ Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ Ҝħゥ ₡ Ⓢ

╗ЌＣ ╗ผŴ₡ħਙŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ


кŴผ ਙ ŐЌО ŐผŴк Ќ

ħ ₡γ⇡ਙผγਙਙف

Оผ ผٹŴ ħਙ



Ő ŐผŴк

Ձ Ձਙʉ


⑾ｘｘｘں

Ա⑾⑾ ผ

Ɔ⇡ ㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

●

Ｃ

Ձ●゜ Ձħفγ ● ħ к ゜ γ

О Ｃ

Ок ₡ ਙここ ħ Ｃ ٹ

к ऑ

ОŐ ḶƆ

ОŴ ゜Ő ㌱ผ

Ŵ ħਙ゜ऑ Ŵ㌱

О О кħ㌱ Ŵ㌱ħкħ

ՁЋҜＣ

ՁŴ Ћ ف Ҝ ₡ħ㌱ кＣħ ħ㌱

ħħħħħħħħħ ħħħħħħħħħ кккккккк

ʉ

ਙ ㌱

Ｃਙ

ਙʉ

ҜṲ Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ

╗ЌＣ

╗ Ŵ₡ħਙŴкＣ ٹ кਙऑこ

ккħħħ㌱к

ｘ″゜ｘฎ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱㅡ″ՙ

GPA-59527




О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ㅡ ″ ՙ

G P

A 5 9 5 2 7

Z O N 5

9 5 2 9 a n d T M P 5 9 5 3 2




О Ő İ ㄦ ɱ ㅡ ″ ՙ

G P A - 5 9 5 2 7 , Z O

N - 5 9 5 2 9 a n d T M P - 5 9 5 3 2



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532



ｘ″゜

ｘ゜

ㄦ


GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532 - REVISED



G P A - 5 9 5 2 7 [ P R J - 5

9 4 6 7 ] - G E N E R A L P L A N

A M E N D M E N T

R E L A T E D

T O

Z O N - 5 9 5 2 9 A N D T

M P - 5 9 5 3 2 -

A P P L I C A N T : A D A V

E N H O M E S - O W N E R : D

E C I S I V E P U R S U I T , L L C

9 7 0 4 W E S T A L E X A

N D E R R O A D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532P(9)


http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/071415-final-pc-packet-items-1-to-44 574/672GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532

1

2

3

4

5



GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532

6

7

8



GPA-59527, ZON-59529 and TMP-59532

9







SUBJECT:ZON-59529 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59527 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:ADAVEN HOMES - OWNER: DECISIVE PURSUIT, LLC - For possible action on a requestfor a Rezoning FROM: R-PD2 (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - 2 UNITS PERACRE) TO: R-D (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-RESTRICTED) on 5.00 acres at 9704West Alexander Road (APN 138-06-401-006), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59467]. Staffrecommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015





BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Consolidated Backup2. Location and Aerial Maps






paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


ZON-59529




Ќ İ

ǲ Ќ Ɔ ǲ Ќ Ɔ

╗

Û●ЌＣḶҜ ОḶ●Ќ ╗ A Ћǲ

Ḷ Ṳ ḶŐǲƆ ╗ A Ћǲ

Ġ●AҜ A Ћǲ

Ћ ● A Ҝ Ḷ Ќ ╗ A Ḛ Ќ A Ɔ ╗

ĠǲŐŐ AЌ ḶЌ A Ћǲ

Ҝ A Ő Ա Ձ ǲ

Ҝ Ḷ Ⓢ Ќ ╗ A ● Ќ

Ɔ ╗

Ќ A Ő Ő Ḷ Û

A Ќ Ḷ

Ќ Ɔ ╗

Ḛ Ő A Ќ Ｃ Ҝ ǲ A Ｃ Ḷ Û Ɔ

╗

ƆḶՁ●╗AŐ●A ＣŐ

ҜA ÛḶḶＣ ╗

Ա Ő Ḷ A Ｃ Ҝ ǲ A Ｃ Ḷ Û

╗

Ġ A Ҝ О ╗ Ḷ Ќ

Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ћ ǲ

╗

ҜAŐԱՁǲ ОǲA ╗

Û AՁǲ Ṳ AЌＣǲŐ ŐＣ

Ќ

Ḛ Ő

A Ќ Ｃ

A

Ќ

Ḷ Ќ

Ｃ Ő

ΎḶЌ ㄦɱㄦธɱ

㌫ ŐḶҜ Ő ОＣธ ╗Ḷ Ő

ＣŴ Ҝਙ₡Ŵⓒ İ ｘ ⓒ ｘ






ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ⑾

Ա⑾⑾ ผ

Ɔ⇡㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

Ύਙħف Ő ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙ ʉＣ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк



Ő ҜĠ Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ Ő ħ₡ ㌱






Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱






Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱




╗ ╗ਙ ʉ ผ








Ձਙ

●

Ｃ

О О ħ к ħ

Ќ Ќ ħفγ ਙ γਙ ผٹħ

ħ

ħف ₡ ここ ผ ħŴк

Ձħこħ ₡ ħŴк

Ŵк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ОԱ

ОкŴ Ա ħ ОŴผ

Ҝ

ħ к

Ҝ

₡ ħŴк

Ћ

ħٹħ

О ОкŴ ₡ こ

ħ ħ Ŵк

О ОкŴ ₡ ٹ к

ਙ ผ

ｘ″゜ｘ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱㅡ″ՙ

ZON-59529







SUBJECT:TMP-59532 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-59527 AND ZON-59529 - GRANDCANYON AND ALEXANDER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ADAVEN HOMES -OWNER: DECISIVE PURSUIT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative MapFOR A 12-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 5.00 acres at 9704 WestAlexander Road (APN 138-06-401-006), R-PD2 (Residential Planned Development - 2 Units PerAcre) [PROPOSED: R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-59467]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015






2. Location and Aerial Maps3. Supporting Documentation





paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


TMP-59532



ǲОA Ő ╗Ҝ ǲЌ ╗Ḷ ОՁA Ќ Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ

A ħ ㌱ Ŵ ħ ਙ ㄤ ħ ħ ਙ ਙ ผ ﹝ ╗ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ Ŵ ﹝ ħ ﹝ ٹ ﹝ ﹝ Ҝ ﹝ Ŵ ㄤㄤ

Оผਙ㈾㌱ A ₡₡ผ ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ ħਙỏḚ ผŴ₡ ŴਙŴ₡A к ゥŴ₡ ผ

Оผਙ㈾㌱ Ќ Ŵこ Ḛ ผŴ₡ ŴਙŴ₡A к ゥŴ₡ ผ

Оผਙऑਙ ₡Ⓢ

Ő О ธ

A ਙผƥОŴผ㌱ к

ӧ ỏ

एں ㈠

㈠㈠㈠ฎ㈠㈠ एｘ㈠㈠㈠

″㈠㈠㈠ ﹝ㅡ㈠㈠㈠⁸㈠㈠㈠ए ں ㈠

㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠ एｘएｘए ″ Û Ŵผ₡

Ḛ ผŴкОкŴ ゥħ ħف

⑾㈠İผผਙ ऑ ਙ ₡

﹝ ﹝ ﹝ Ձ●ⓒਙħف ゥħ ħف Ő О ธ

ऑผਙऑਙ ₡

ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴкƆ׀Ŵผ

ਙ ਙ ف ㈠㈠㈠㈠ㄤ㈠㈠ Ќ ㈠㈠ A ㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠

﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ кਙਙผA ผ ŴŐŴ ħਙ﹝﹝﹝㈠Ќ㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠A㈠﹝﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝

Ḛ ผਙA ㌱ผ

ㄦｘ

﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ਙ ⁸Ⓢ ħ ﹝﹝ں㈠㈠㈠″ธ㈠㈠﹝﹝﹝ ﹝ ħ ﹝㈠ธ㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠ㅡ㈠㈠㈠㈠﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝ ﹝

A ₡₡ħ ħਙŴк●⑾ਙผこ Ŵ ħਙ

ОŐ Ḷ ОǲŐ ╗ Ḷ Û Ќ ǲŐ ㌱ħħٹ Оผħ ՁՁ

ਙ Ŵ㌱

A ₡₡ผ ธฎỢ ħ Ҝ ਙਙՁ Ŵ

Оγਙ

Ŵゥ

ħ Ձ ŴЋ Ŵف

Ɔ Ŵ

Ύ ħऑฎɱںㄦ

ǲ こ ŴħкA ₡₡ผ

A О ОՁ ● A Ќ ╗ A ₡Ŵٹ Ġ ਙこ ਙ Ŵ㌱ Ќ Ŵ γŴÛ γħ

A ₡₡ผ

ɱںİ ธＣ ਙк ਙ

A

Оγਙ

ӧՙｘธỏ″ㄦ ฎㄦฎฎ

Ŵゥ

ħ Ձ ŴЋ Ŵف

Ɔ Ŵ ЌЋ Ύ ħऑ ฎɱںธɱ

ǲ こ ŴħкA ₡₡ผ

Ŵ γŴʉ ㌀ Ŵ₡Ŵٹ γਙこ㈠㌱ਙこ

Ő ǲ О Ő ǲ Ɔ ǲ Ќ ╗ A ╗ ●Ћ ǲ ╗ Ŵ ǲ فħ ผħف

ਙ Ŵ㌱ Ќ ħ㌱ਙк Ա ผفħ

A ₡₡ ″ｘｘ Ɔİਙ Աкٹ₡ ｘں

Оγਙ

ӧՙｘธỏ″ธ ฎฎㅡㅡ

Ŵゥ

ӧՙｘธỏ″ธ ㄦธ

ħ Ձ ŴЋ Ŵف

Ɔ Ŵ ЌЋ

Ύ ħऑฎɱںںฎ

ǲ こ ŴħкA ₡₡ผ ħ㌱ਙк ⇡㌀ Ŵ ㌱ਙผऑ㈠㌱ਙこ

●㌱ ผ ħ⑾ γŴ ●Ŵこ γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ⑾ਙผこ Ŵ ħਙ⇡こ ħ ₡ʉ ħ γ γħŴऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙħ ผ Ŵ₡Ŵ㌱㌱ผŴ ਙ γ ⇡ ਙ⑾こ ਙʉ к ₡ف Ŵ₡⇡ кħ ⑾㈠●₡ ผ Ŵ₡ γŴ γ ħ ħਙ ผ ऑਙħ⇡к ⑾ਙผ

ħŴ㌱㌱ผŴ㌱ħ ħħ⑾ਙผこ Ŵ ħਙऑผ ₡ⓒŴ₡ γŴ ħŴ㌱㌱ผŴ㌱ħ ⓒ⑾Ŵк ħ⑾ਙผこ Ŵ ħਙਙผħ㌱ਙこ ऑк Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙこ Ŵ㌱Ŵ γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ ਙ⇡ ผ ㈾㌱ ₡㈠●⑾ผ γ ผ㌱ ผ ħ⑾ γŴ ●Ŵこ γ ਙʉ ผਙผऑผ㌱γŴ ผ

ӧਙผਙऑ ħਙγਙк₡ ผỏਙ ⑾γ ऑผਙऑ ผ ħٹਙкٹ ₡ħ γħŴऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙ

ਙผŴف ⑾кк Ŵ γਙผħ▷ ₡⇡ γ ਙʉ ผ ਙこ Ŵ γħ⇡こ ħħਙ ⓒŴħ₡ħ㌱Ŵ ₡⇡ γ ਙʉ ผƥħفŴ ผ ⇡ кਙʉ ㈠

Оผħ Ќ Ŵこ

ㄤ㈠㈠㈠ ⁸ ㈠ ⁸

㈠ㄤ㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠

㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠㈠

㈠ ƥ ⁸ ⁸ ⁸

Ɔ⇡㌱ผħ⇡ ₡Ŵ₡ʉ ਙผ⇡ ⑾ਙผ こ

╗γħ кธ ₡Ŵ ⑾ ⓒธｘ⇓Ɔ﹝

ⓒ

Ќ ਙ Ŵผ ⇡кħ㌱ฌħŴ₡⑾ਙผŴħ₡ ਙ Ŵ₡Ɔ Ŵ

Ő ٹ ħ ₡ںｘ゜ธՙ゜ｘฎ

ҜAŐAЌЌĠAŐ╗

ЌḶ AŐОⓈԱⓈฌ

A ḶЌǲЋAＣAฌ

Ҝ Ḷここħħਙ ゥİ⟨ ںɱธｘں ฌ

Ҝ●●●ਙਙผỢЌỢ

ŐＣ ǲО AŐ ╗Ҝ ǲЌ ╗Ⓢ Ɔǲ Ќ Ձ

Ŵ

Ҝ ħف Ŵ

╗ ਙ Ŵк

Ŵ Ő ㌱ ħٹ ₡

⟨

Ő ㌱ ħٹ ₡Ա ฌ

⟨╗ γ Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙʉ ħккਙ ⇡ ₡ こ ₡㌱ਙこ ऑк ħк γ

⇡こ ħ ₡ こ Ŵ ผħŴк γŴٹ ⇡ ผ ٹħ ʉ ₡ ⇡ γ

ऑŴผ こ ਙ⑾ОкŴħف⑾ਙผ㌱ਙħ ㌱ʉ ħ γŴऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ⇡к

㌱ ħਙਙ⑾γ ΎਙħفḶ ผ₡ħŴ㌱㈠ฌ

⑾

⇓₡ ऑਙ ⇓A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙОŴ㌱ ⇓A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ ħਙਙผこ㈠ऑ₡⑾

Ő Ｃ

Ｃ Ő Ő Ő Ｃ

ｘ″゜ｘ

゜

ㄦ


TMP-59532



ｘㄦ゜ธฎ゜

ㄦ


TMP-59532



TMP 59532

Grand Canyon and Alexander

NWC Alexander Road & Grand Canyon Drive

Proposed 12 unit single family development.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

Existing Use DESCRIPTION #UNITRATE/#

UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DWELL] 12

9.52 114

AM Peak Hour 0.75 9

PM Peak Hour 1.00 12

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Alexander Road



Grand Canyon Road



Adjacent Street ADT Capacity

Alexander Road 34,500

Grand Canyon Road 14,670

This project is expected to add about 114 trips per day on Alexander Rd. & Grand Canyon Dr. Currently, Alexander is atabout 15 percent of capacity and Grand Canyon is at about 14 percent of capacity. With this project, Alexander isexpected to remain at about 15 percent of capacity and Grand Canyon to be at about 15 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this project will add about 12 trips in the peak hour, or about one every five minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.







SUBJECT:MOD-59457 - MAJOR MODIFICATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:SKYE CANYON VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Modification ofthe Grand Canyon Village Plan TO ADD 0.84 ACRES OF COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL TOTHE PLAN (Multiple APNs), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59394]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps2. Conditions and Staff Report - MOD-59457, GPA-59458 and ZON-59459 [PRJ-59394]3. Supporting Documentation - MOD-59457, GPA-59458 and ZON-59459 [PRJ-59394]4. Photo(s) - MOD-59457, GPA-59458 and ZON-59459 [PRJ-59394]

5. Justification Letter - MOD-59457, GPA-59458 and ZON-59459 [PRJ-59394]



MOD-59457, GPA-59458 and ZON-59459 [PRJ-59394]

YK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SKYE CANYON VILLAGE, LLC


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

MOD-59457 Staff recommends APPROVAL.

GPA-59458 Staff recommends APPROVAL. MOD-59457

ZON-59459 Staff recommends APPROVAL. GPA-59458 MOD-59457




YK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

As a result of a recent realignment of Grand Canyon Drive, two small parcels were created onthe east side of Grand Canyon Drive, north of Skye Canyon Park Drive. The applicant has purchased these parcels and would like to incorporate them into a proposed shopping centerdevelopment. In order for this to be possible, the Grand Canyon Village Master Plan has to bemodified to add these parcels to the plan. An accompanying General Plan Amendment andRezoning will complete the integration and allow for the proposed shopping center developmentto progress. The requests would allow for an orderly, consistent and unified development in this

rapidly urbanizing area of the City. As the proposal is consistent with the long rangedevelopment goals of the City and development patterns of the area, staff is recommendingapproval.



12/20/00

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (Z-0093-00) from R-E(Residence Estates) to PD (Planned Development) Zone on 89.3 Acreslocated at the northeast corner of the intersection of Grand Teton Drive and

Grand Canyon Drive. The ROI (Resolution of Intent) expired on 12/20/03 forundeveloped parcels, including the subject site. The Planning Commissionand staff recommended approval.

04/02/03

The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification (MOD-1696)to the Grand Canyon Village Master Plan to add 23.41 acres to the overallPlan area, change the land use designation from Business Park to Medium-Low Density Residential and Community Commercial on 53.08 acres and tomake changes to the Plan text regarding permitted uses, land use descriptionsand map updates within the Plan adjacent to the east side of Grand CanyonDrive, north of Grand Teton Drive. The subject site was changed toCommunity Commercial by this action. The Planning Commission and staff

recommended approval.

04/02/03

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-1697) from C-2(General Commercial) to PD (Planned Development) on a portion of 23.41acres adjacent to the west side of the Frontage Road (Oso Blanca Road),approximately 2,000 feet north of Grand Teton Drive. The PlanningCommission and staff recommended approval.




YK




11/17/10

The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-39455) from: R-E(Residence Estates) to: PD (Planned Development) on a portion of 25.48acres and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-39453) for a proposed250,267 square-foot shopping center on 25.48 acres at the northwest corner ofHorse Drive and Oso Blanca Road. The Planning Commission and staffrecommended approval.

03/22/12

Planning Department staff Administratively approved a Site DevelopmentPlan Review (SDR-44792) for a Minor Amendment of a previously approvedSite Development Plan Review (SDR-39453) for a proposed 250,267 square-foot shopping center on 29.82 acres at the northwest corner of Horse Driveand Oso Blanca Road.




No files on record at this time.


05/13/15

Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the requirements for a MajorModification to the Grand Canyon Village Plan, a related General PlanAmendment and Zoning applications. The owner is planning on developing acommercial/retail development and is consolidating parcels to facilitate this project. No issues were noted at this meeting.


06/15/15Meeting Start Time: 6:00 p.m. Meeting End Time: 6:30 p.m.Attendance: 2 Applicants, 2 CLV Staff

No one from the public attended this meeting.

Field Check

06/04/15 Staff visited the site and found raw desert land. No issues were noted.




YK



Details of Application Request Site Area

Net Acres 24.10

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special



TND (Traditional NeighborhoodDevelopment)

T-D (TraditionalDevelopment)

PCD (PlannedCommunity

Development)

PD (PlannedDevelopment)

North UndevelopedTND (Traditional NeighborhoodDevelopment)


West UndevelopedTND (Traditional NeighborhoodDevelopment)


SouthSingle Family

Dwelling

PCD (PlannedCommunity

Development)

PD (PlannedDevelopment)

EastRight-of-Way (Oso

Blanca Road and US95)

Right-of-Way (OsoBlanca Road and US 95)

Right-of-Way (OsoBlanca Road and US 95)


Grand Canyon Village Y

Skye Canyon Master Plan Y










YK




Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

Skye Canyon ParkDrive

Primary Arterial Master Plan of Streetsand Highways Map

150 Y

Oso Blanca Road SecondaryCollector

Master Plan of Streetsand Highways Map

80 Y

Grand Canyon Drive Primary Arterial Master Plan of Streetsand Highways Map

100 N

ANALYSIS

Grand Canyon Drive, approximately 600-feet north of Skye Canyon Park Drive, has beenrealigned to curve northwest from a true north alignment. This has resulted in two small parcels being created on the east side of Grand Canyon Drive. These parcels are too small to bedeveloped on their own. The owner of the adjacent parcel has purchased these two parcels andwould like to development them in conjunction with a proposed shopping center. This requires aModification to the Grand Canyon Village Master Plan to add these two parcels. The GeneralPlan and Rezoning requests will complete the integration for a unified development on the eastside of Grand Canyon Drive, north of Skye Canyon Park Drive.

As this is effectively a “clean-up” action to the City of Las Vegas development codes for thisarea and does not have an impact on any surrounding parcels, staff recommends approval.

FINDINGS (MOD-59457)

The realignment of Grand Canyon Drive has dictated the need to modify the Grand CanyonVillage Master Plan to add the remnant parcels into the plan for orderly, unified development.Therefore, staff is approving the Minor Modification request.






YK





The proposal will bring these small remnant parcels from the realignment of GrandCanyon Drive into the Grand Canyon Village Master Plan and will be compatible withsurrounding future developments.



The proposed zoning will align with the existing zoning designations on the adjacent parcel to the east and south.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities toaccommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan

Amendment; and

This area is rapidly developing with adequate infrastructure to accommodate the uses permitted under the proposed amendment.



The proposal will be integrated and conform with the existing Grand Canyon Village

Master Plan.




The proposed zoning will conform to the related General Plan Amendment.



The proposed zoning will align with the existing zoning designations on the adjacent parcel to the east and south.




YK





The recent realignment of Grand Canyon Drive has caused the need for the rezoning tomatch the adjacent parcels zoning in order to allow for a unified development andtherefore, is appropriate.



This area is rapidly developing with adequate infrastructure to accommodate the uses permitted under the proposed zoning request.

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 34 - MOD-5945724 - GPA-59458 and ZON-59459

NOTICES MAILED 528 - MOD-59457528 - GPA-59458 and ZON-59459

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱɱㅡ

MOD-59457



M O D - 5 9 4 5 7

[ P R J - 5 9 3 9 4 ] -

M A J O R

M O D

I F I C A T I O N

R E L A T E D

T O

G P A - 5 9 4 5 8

A N D Z O

N - 5 9 4 5 9

-

A P P L I C A N T / O W N E

R : S K Y E C A N Y O N V I L L A G E , L L C

S O U T H S I D E O F G

R A N D C A N Y O N D R I V E , 2 8 0 F E E T W E S T O F O S O

B L A N C A R O A D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



M O D - 5 9 4 5 7

[ P R J - 5 9 3 9 4 ] -

M A J O R

M O D

I F I C A T I O N

R E L A T E D

T O

G P A - 5 9 4 5 8

A N D Z O

N - 5 9 4 5 9

-





B L A N C A R O A D

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱɱㅡ

MOD-59457, GPA-59458 and ZON-59459







SUBJECT:GPA-59458 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: SKYE CANYON VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a requestfor a General Plan Amendment FROM: TND (TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOODDEVELOPMENT) TO: PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) on 0.84 acres onthe south side of Grand Canyon Drive, 280 Feet West of Oso Blanca Road (APNs 125-07-201-004 and 125-07-101-008), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59394]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015











paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱɱㅡ

GPA-59458




Ɔ О Ḷ ● Ќ ╗ ǲ

Ｃ Ő

Ќ ╗

ǲ ǲ О

ǲ ǲ Ձ

Ќ

ԱŐǲЌ╗

ՁЌ

ǲОA Ő

Ｃ Ő

ĠAЋAƆⓈ AЌḶЌ

AЋǲ

ḚŐAЌＣЋ●ǲÛ ƆОŐ●ЌḚ AЋǲ

Ｃ●AҜḶЌＣ ԱŐ●ＣḚǲ AЋǲ

Ҝ●ՁÛ ǲǲＣ AЌḶЌ AЋǲ

Û A Ձ ǲ Ő

Ḛ A Ő Ｃ ǲ Ќ Ɔ О Ձ

Ḷ Ɔ

Ḷ

Ա Ձ A Ќ A

Ő Ｃ

Û

Ɔ ǲ

AЌ ḶЌ

ОAŐ

ＣŐ

Ќ

╗ ǲ ǲ

О ǲ ǲ

Ձ Ќ

Ќ Ḛ

Ő A Ќ Ｃ

A Ќ Ḷ Ќ

Ｃ Ő

●ŐḶЌ ҜḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќ ŐＣ

ḚОA ㄦɱㅡㄦฎ

㌫ŐḶҜ ╗ЌＣ ╗Ḷ О







Ḛ ผŴк ОкŴ Aこ ₡こ ש

Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱

Ɔ Ɔ ผٹ

ħ㌱ ਙここ

ผ㌱ħŴк


Ҝ Ҝ ₡ħこ

Ġ Ġħفγ

ҜՁ A Ҝ

₡ħこ Ձਙʉ A Ŵ㌱γ ₡



кਙऑこ

ОŐ ḶƆ ОŴผ Ő ㌱ผ Ŵ ħਙ゜ Ḷऑ ƆऑŴ㌱


ՁЋҜＣ ՁŴ Ћ Ŵ Ҝ ₡ħ㌱ŴкفＣħ

ผħ㌱


╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ


Ｃਙʉ ਙʉ ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ҜṲⓈ Ｃਙʉ

ਙʉ Ҝħゥ

₡ Ⓢ

╗ЌＣ ╗ผŴ₡ħਙŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ ₡ Ｃ ٹ кਙऑこ

О О⇡кħ㌱ Ŵ㌱ħкħ кŴผ ਙ

ŐЌО ŐผŴк Ќ ħفγ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡ Оผ

ผ Ŵ ħਙٹ



Ő ŐผŴ к

Ձ Ձਙʉ


ｘｘｘ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡ ㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

ĠAЋA AЌ Ќ A

ḚŐA Ｃ ● ОŐ●ЌḚ A

Ḛ

A Ќ

Ձ● ゜ Ձħفγ ● ₡ ħ к ゜ γ

О Ｃ

Ок ₡ ここ ħ Ｃ ٹ

к こ

О ОŴผ ゜ Ŵ ħਙ ゜ ऑ ㌱

О

О к ħ ħ кħ

ՁЋ ҜＣ

Ձ Ћ Ŵ Ҝف ħ㌱ŴкＣħ

ผħ㌱

ħħħħħ ħħħħħ ккккк

ʉ

Ｃ ʉ ʉ

ҜṲ Ｃ ʉ

ЌＣ

ผŴ ħਙ кＣ ٹ к こ

О О ⇡ккħħ ккккŴผ ਙ

ｘ″゜ｘ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱɱㅡ

GPA-59458







SUBJECT:ZON-59459 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-59458 - PUBLIC HEARING -APPLICANT/OWNER: SKYE CANYON VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a requestfor a Rezoning FROM: T-D (TRADITIONAL DEVELOPMENT) TO: P-D (PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT) on 0.84 acres on the south side of Grand Canyon Drive, 280 Feet West ofOso Blanca Road (APNs 125-07-201-004 and 125-07-101-008), Ward 6 (Ross) [PRJ-59394].Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015











paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜ธ″゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦɱɱㅡ

ZON-59459




Ɔ О Ḷ ● Ќ ╗ ǲ

Ｃ Ő

Ќ ╗

ǲ ǲ О

ǲ ǲ Ձ

Ќ

ԱŐǲЌ╗

ՁЌ

ǲОA Ő

Ｃ Ő

ĠAЋAƆⓈ AЌḶЌ

AЋǲ

ḚŐAЌＣЋ●ǲÛ ƆОŐ●ЌḚ AЋǲ

Ｃ●AҜḶЌＣ ԱŐ●ＣḚǲ AЋǲ

Ҝ●ՁÛ ǲǲＣ AЌḶЌ AЋǲ

Û A Ձ ǲ Ő

Ḛ A Ő Ｃ ǲ Ќ Ɔ О Ձ

Ḷ Ɔ

Ḷ

Ա Ձ A Ќ A

Ő Ｃ

Û

Ɔ ǲ

AЌ ḶЌ

ОAŐ

ＣŐ

Ќ

╗ ǲ ǲ

О ǲ ǲ

Ձ Ќ

Ќ Ḛ

Ő A Ќ Ｃ

A Ќ Ḷ Ќ

Ｃ Ő

●ŐḶЌ ҜḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќ ŐＣ

ΎḶЌ ㄦɱㅡㄦɱ

㌫ŐḶҜ ╗ Ｃ ╗Ḷ О







ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ⑾

Ա⑾⑾

ผ

Ɔ⇡㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

Ύਙħف Ő ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙ ʉＣ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк



Ő ҜĠ Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ Ő ħ₡ ㌱






Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱






Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱




╗ ╗ਙ ʉ ผ




Ő Ｃ Ɔħف к Ŵこħк Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ő ผħ㌱ ₡


Ő Ɔħفк Ŵこħк Ő ħ₡ ħŴк

Ő Ձ Ɔħف к Ŵこħк ਙこऑŴ㌱

Ձਙ

ĠAЋA AЌ Ќ A

ḚŐA Ｃ ● ОŐ●ЌḚ A

Ḛ

A Ќ

О О ħ к ħ

Ќ Ќ ħفγ ਙ γ ਙ₡ ħ㌱ٹ

ħ

ħف ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

Ձħこħ ħŴк

Ḛ Ŵк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ОԱ

ОкŴ ₡ Աħ ОŴ

Ҝ

ħ кккк

Ҝ

₡ ħŴк

ħٹħ

О ОкŴ ਙ

₡ħ ħ Ŵк

О ОкŴ ₡ ٹ

ｘ″゜ｘ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦɱɱㅡ

ZON-59459







SUBJECT:ZON-59354 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILYREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-1(SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO: P-O (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE) on 0.15 acres at721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58948]. Staff recommendsAPPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:


BACKUP DOCUMENTATION: 1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357 [PRJ-58948]2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357 [PRJ-

58948]3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357 [PRJ-58948]4. Photo(s) - ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357 [PRJ-58948]5. Justification Letter - ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357 [PRJ-58948]



ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357 [PRJ-58948]

YK




ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILY REVOCABLE

FAMILY TRUST


CASE


REQUIRED FOR

APPROVAL

ZON-59354 Staff recommends APPROVAL.

VAR-59355 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-59354

VAR-59356 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-59354

SDR-59357 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-59354

VAR-59355

VAR-59356

** CONDITIONS **


Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (ZON-59354),Variance (VAR-59356) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59357) shall berequired, if approved.








YK

Conditions Page Two



Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (ZON-59354),Variance (VAR-59355) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-59357) shall berequired, if approved.






Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (ZON-59354),Variances (VAR-59355 and VAR-59356) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless exercised

pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be filed forconsideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and buildingelevations, date stamped 05/19/15, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. The chain link fence along the east perimeter shall be removed.




YK



5. A Waiver from Title 19.08.050 Table 4 is hereby approved, to allow portions of the northand south landscape buffers to be zero-foot wide, where five-foot wide is required.

6. An Exception from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow no parking lot landscapetrees or perimeter buffer trees where required.

7. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine themost appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The mappingaction shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits.”



10. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, LandscapeArchitect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at the sametime application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground sprinkler systemis required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not impede visibilityof any traffic control device.


Public Works

12. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks adjacentto this site on 8th Street in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040, if any, tothe satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.

13. Landscape and maintain all unimproved right-of-way adjacent to this site. All landscapingand private improvements installed with this project shall be situated and maintained so as

to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at all development accessdrives and abutting street intersections.

14. Submit an Encroachment Agreement for landscaping and private improvements, if any, inthe 8th Street public right-of-way prior to this issuance of permits for these improvements.The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the Encroachment Agreementand add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. Ifrequested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-




YK



of way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's EncroachmentAgreement. The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public

right of way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall betransferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of the EncroachmentAgreement. Coordinate all requirements for the Encroachment Agreement with the LandDevelopment Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).

15. Sign and record a Covenant Running with Land agreement for the possible futureinstallation of streetlights. Such Covenant Running with Land agreement must be recordedwith the County Recorder and a copy of the recorded document must be provided to theCity prior to the issuance of building permits for this site.




YK



** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Rezoning and Site Development Plan Review related to theconversion of a 1,980 square-foot single-family residence to an office building at 721 South 8th Street. This proposal is accompanied by Variances to allow two parking spaces, where seven arerequired (VAR-59355) and to allow a 50-foot lot width where a 60-foot minimum lot width isrequired (VAR-59356). Staff recommends approval of the proposed development and all relatedentitlement requests, as this will allow for a successful office conversion and integration of thelast remaining residential dwelling on the block. If denied, the site will remain as a single-familyresidence.

ISSUES

A Variance (VAR-59355) is required to allow two parking spaces, where seven is theminimum required. Staff supports this request.

A Variance (VAR-59356) is required to allow a lot width of 50 feet, where 60 feet is theminimum required. Staff supports this request.

A Waiver is required to allow a zero-foot wide landscape buffer on the east perimeterwhere fifteen feet is required and to allow a zero-to-five foot wide landscape perimeter buffer along the north and south perimeters where eight feet is required. Staff supports

this request. An Exception is required to allow no parking lot landscape trees or perimeter buffer trees

where required. Staff supports this request.



There are no relevant City actions related to this property on file.




There are no relevant records on file for this property.




YK




04/20/15

Staff met with the applicant and reviewed the applications required for

converting a single-family residence into an office. Several issues wereaddressed regarding the request such as landscape buffer Waivers, parkingVariance, and a reduced lot width Variance. These challenges have beenaddressed by most of the surrounding properties as the trend from residentialto office taking place in this central area of the city continues.



Field Check

06/04/15

Staff visited the site and found a well maintained single-family dwelling.There was mature desert landscaping in good condition in the front yard. Therear yard, off an alley, had an accessory structure and a chain link fence with privacy slates.


Site Area

Net Acres 0.15

Surrounding

Property

Existing Land Use

Per Title 19.12

Planned or Special


Subject PropertySingle-Family,

DetachedMXU (Mixed-Use)

R-1 (Single FamilyResidential)

North Office MXU (Mixed-Use) P-R (Professional Office)

South Office MXU (Mixed-Use) P-R (Professional Office)

East Group Home MXU (Mixed-Use) P-R (Professional Office)

West Office MXU (Mixed-Use) P-R (Professional Office)



Special Purpose and Overlay Districts ComplianceLive/Work Overlay District Y


Trails N/A







YK






Min. Lot Width 60 Feet 50 Feet N

Min. Setbacks

Front

North Side

South Side

Rear



YYYY*

Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 28 % Y

Max. Building Height 2 Stories 1 Story Y


*A conversion from an existing residential structure may maintain the existing setbacks. Anyadditions may also be constructed to the existing established corner setback.




Ratio Trees

Buffer Trees:

North South

West

East (Alley)

1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet

-


-


-

N* N*Y-

TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 12 Trees 2 Trees N*



2 Trees 0 Trees N*


Min. Zone Width

North

South West

East (Alley)



Y**Y**

YY

*These areas of deficient landscaping are addressed with an exception to allow an alternativelandscape design per Title 19.08.040(F)(3). Staff supports the exception**A Waiver has been requested.




YK



Street Name

Functional

Classification of

Street(s)

Governing Document

Actual

Street Width

(Feet)

Compliance

with Street

Section

8th StreetMajor Collector

StreetPlanned Streets and

Highways Map80 Y


Parking Requirement

Use

Gross Floor

Area or

Number of

Units


Parking

Ratio

Parking Parking

RegularHandi-capped

RegularHandi-capped

Office, Otherthan Listed

1,980 SF1 space

per 300SF

7

TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 7 2 N


Percent Deviation 72%

Waivers


To provide a five-foot widelandscape buffer on the northand south perimeters.

To provide a zero-foot widelandscape buffer on portionsof the north and south perimeters.

Approval

Exceptions


To provided two parking lotlandscape trees.

To provide zero parking lotlandscape trees.

Approval

To provide 12 perimeter

landscape buffer trees.

To provide two perimeter

landscape buffer trees.Approval

ANALYSIS

The subject site is designated MXU (Mixed Use) on the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan, whichis intended for uses allowed within the O (Office) Master Plan designation. Due to the gradualincrease in traffic and other development factors, the area has undergone a significant




YK



transformation to low intensity office conversions and is no longer suitable for the continuation

of low density residential uses. The applicant’s request to rezone the site from the R-1 (SingleFamily Residential) zoning district to the P-O (Professional Office) zoning district is necessaryfor the proposed office use and is supported by the recent development patterns to low intensityoffice uses. The applicant has submitted a proposal that retains the contextual design of theneighborhood to preserve its residential historic character and integrity.

The lot has a width of 50 feet and does not meet the minimum 60-foot width required in a P-O(Professional Office) zoning district. A Variance (VAR-59356) has been requested. Staffsupports this request as this will allow the last remaining residential parcel on this block to bezoned for office use and the existing conditions do not allow for conformance.

There is a 240 square-foot detached accessory structure located approximately nine feet from therear northeast corner of the property. This structure contributes to the gross floor area, giving the proposal 1,980 square feet of office space, thus requiring seven parking spaces. The provided site plan show two parking spaces located at the rear of the property adjacent to the alley with one being a handicap parking space. A Variance (VAR-59355) has been requested to allow two parking spaces where seven are required. Staff supports this request, as the lot is not largeenough to provide all the required spaces.

This project is expected to add about 12 trips per day on 8 th Street and Gass Avenue. Currently,8th Street is about 7% of capacity and Gass Avenue is about 21% of capacity. The approval ofthis project will not change these capacities. The existing street infrastructure can service the

expected trip generation of this project.

This parcel is currently served by LVVWD but does not have the required backflow prevention per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD formeter sizing, available fire flow, and installation of required backflow prevention.

The proposal will retain much of the existing mature landscaping, with the exception of theremoval of the turf located in the rear yard for parking. Per Table 4 of Title 19.08.050, turfcoverage is limited to 25% of the landscaped area. The landscape plan shows all desertlandscaping and therefore this condition is being met. An Exception is required as there is noroom to plant the required perimeter landscape trees on the north or south sides. The front (west)

perimeter has the required trees in place. Staff supports this Exception request.

Staff recommends approval of the Rezoning, Site Development Plan Review, and the relatedVariances requests, as the proposed development will be harmonious and compatible with thesurrounding area. If denied, the subject site will remain as a single family residence.




YK






The site is designated as MXU (Mixed Use) on the Las Vegas Redevelopment Planmap. The proposed P-O (Professional Office) zoning district conforms to the O(Office) land use designation, which is one of the General Plan land use designations permitted under the Mixed Use category of the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan. The proposal is therefore in compliance with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the rezoningwill be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The uses allowed within the P-O (Professional Office) are generally compatible with thesurrounding area, as the provided site plan maintains the contextual residential designfound in the area.



Growth in the community indicates that a Rezoning to the P-O (Professional Office)

district is appropriate. The design and scale of the proposed office building remains incontext with the definition of the P-O (Professional Office) zoning district as theresidential character of the area is retained.



The site is accessed primarily from a 20-foot alleyway between 8th and 9th Street. Siteaccess will not impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood traffic.



1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”




YK



Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptionaltopographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition ofthe piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardshipsupon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted soas to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantialdetriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resourcesand without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance orresolution.”

Evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the applicant hasnot created a self-imposed hardship by converting a single-family dwelling into an office use.The lot only provides room for two parking spaces. Providing the seven required to allowconformance to the Title 19 requirements would make the lot un-useable as an office. In view ofthis hardship imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s

hardship is not preferential in nature, and it is thereby within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 forgranting of Variances.



1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece of

property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptionaltopographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of

the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardshipsupon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted soas to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantialdetriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resourcesand without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance orresolution.”




YK



The applicant has not created a self-imposed hardship by requesting a 50-foot wide lot where a60-foot wide lot is required. There is little, if any alternative that would allow conformance to the

Title 19 requirements. Staff finds that the applicant’s hardship is not preferential in nature, and itis within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.





The proposal is compatible with the surrounding office uses and the is the last remainingresidential dwelling on the block to be converted.




With the approval of the requested Variances (VAR-59355 and VAR-59356), thedevelopment will be consistent with all applicable City plans, policies and standards. TheVariance requests are sought after in order to retain as much of the original condition of

the structure as possible, thus continuing the intent of the P-O (Professional Office) zoningdistrict to be a transitional zone to allow low intensity administrative and professionaloffices.



The site is accessed primarily from a 20-foot alleyway between 8th and 9th Street. Siteaccess will not impact adjacent roadways or neighborhood traffic.


Staff finds that the proposed landscaping retains the residential character of theneighborhood and no changes are proposed to the building. These conditions areappropriate for the area.








YK



The building elevations are be compatible with the surrounding professional officeconversions. The applicant is retaining the existing architectural style of the building, thus

keeping with the established design pattern of the surrounding area.


general welfare.

The subject site will be subject to regular inspection, and will therefore not compromisethe public health, safety or general welfare.


NOTICES MAILED 240 - ZON-59354 and VAR-59355240 - VAR-59356 and SDR-59357

APPROVALS 0

PROTESTS 0



ｘㄦ゜

ɱ゜

ㄦ

ОŐİ ㄦฎɱㅡฎ

ZON-59354



ｘㄦ゜

ɱ゜

ㄦ


ZON-59354




Ɔ

ฎ ╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ɔ ՙ

╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ɔ ″

╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ḛ A Ő ǲ Ɔ A Ћ ǲ

Ḛ A Ɔ Ɔ A Ћ ǲ

Ɔ ｘ ╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

ǲ Ա Ḷ Ќ Ќ ǲ Ћ ● ՁՁǲ

A Ћ ǲ

ОAŐ ОAƆǲḶ

ฎ ╗

Ġ

О Ձ

ǲ ՁA Ő

A Ћ ǲ

ŐAЌ●Ɔ AЋǲ

Ɔ

ɱ ╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

ⓈA AЋǲ

ƆĠ Ḷ Ḷ Ћ ǲ Ő

A Ћ ǲ

Ɔ

ՙ ╗ Ġ

Ɔ

╗

Ɔ

ｘ ╗

Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ɔ

ฎ ╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

Ɔ ɱ

╗ Ġ

Ɔ ╗

ǲ ĠA ŐՁǲƆ╗ḶЌ

ԱՁ ЋＣ

Ɔ Ձ A Ɔ Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ

Ա Ձ Ћ Ｃ

ΎḶЌ ㄦɱ ㄦㅡ

㌫ŐḶҜ Ő ╗Ḷ О

ＣŴ Û ₡ ₡Ŵⓒ İ






ħ Ձħこħ

ｘｘｘ ⑾

Ա⑾⑾ ผ

Ɔ⇡㈾

㌱

Оผਙऑ ผ

Ύਙħف Ő ธ Ҝ ₡ħこ Ձਙʉ Ｃ ħ Ő ħ₡ ħŴк





Ő ҜĠО Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ҝਙ⇡ħк ゜ ҜŴ⑾Ŵ㌱ ผ ₡ Ġਙこ ОŴผ




Ḷ Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱






Ҝ ●₡ ผħŴк

Ћ ħٹħ㌱




╗ ╗ਙʉ ผ


Ⓢ ӧḚО AＣ ħفŴ ħਙỏ Ⓢ₡ ٹ кਙऑ ₡


Ő Ｃ Ɔħف к Ŵこħк Ő ħ₡ ħŴк Ő ผħ㌱ ₡


Ő Ɔħفк Ŵこħк Ő ħ₡ ħŴк


Ձਙ

ฎ

О Ձ

Ɔ

ɱ ╗

Ɔ

ｘ

О О ħ к ħ

ħفγ ਙ γ ਙ₡ ħ㌱ٹ

ħ

ħف ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

Ձħこħ ħŴк

Ḛ Ŵк ਙここ ผ㌱ħŴк

ОԱ

ОкŴ ₡ Աħ ОŴ

ħ к゜

₡ ħŴк

ħٹħ

О ОкŴ ਙこ

Ŵ₡ħ ħ Ŵк ٹ

О ОкŴ ₡ ٹ к

ผ

ｘ″゜ ՙ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎɱㅡฎ

ZON-59354



ｘㄦ゜ ɱ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ ฎ ɱ ㅡ ฎ



ｘㄦ゜ ɱ ゜ㄦ




ｘㄦ゜ ɱ ゜

ㄦ


Z O N - 5 9 3 5 4 , V A R

- 5 9 3 5 5 , V A R - 5 9

3 5 6 a n d S D R - 5 9

3 5 7



ｘㄦ゜ ɱ゜ㄦОŐİ ㄦฎɱㅡฎ

Z O N - 5 9 3 5 4 , V A

R - 5 9 3 5 5 , V A R - 5

9 3 5 6 a n d S D R - 5

9 3 5 7



ｘㄦ゜ ɱ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ

ฎ ɱ ㅡ ฎ

Z O N - 5 9 3 5 4 , V A R - 5 9 3 5 5 , V A R

- 5 9 3 5 6 a n d S D R

- 5 9 3 5 7



ｘㄦ゜ ɱ ゜ㄦ

О Ő İ ㄦ

ฎ ɱ ㅡ ฎ

Z

O N - 5 9 3 5 4 , V A R

- 5 9 3 5 5 , V A R - 5 9 3 5 6 a n d S D R - 5 9

3 5 7



ｘㄦ゜ ɱ ゜ㄦ




Z O N - 5 9 3 5 4

[ P R J - 5 8 9 4 8 ] -

R E Z O N I N G

R E L A T E D

T O

V A R - 5 9 3 5

5 ,

V A R - 5 9 3 5 6

A N D S D R - 5 9 3 5 7

-


R : C O M E R F A M I L Y R E V O

C A B L E F A M I L Y T R U S T

7 2 1 S O U T H 8 T H S

T R E E T

0 6 / 0 4 / 1 5



ｘㄦ゜

ɱ゜

ㄦ


ZON-59354, VAR-59355, VAR-59356 and SDR-59357







SUBJECT:VAR-59355 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-59354 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILY REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on arequest for a Variance TO ALLOW TWO PARKING SPACES WHERE SEVEN SPACES AREREQUIRED on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58948]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:







paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜

ɱ゜

ㄦ


VAR-59355







SUBJECT:VAR-59356 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-59354 AND VAR-59355 - PUBLICHEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILY REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 50-FOOT WIDE P-O(PROFESSIONAL OFFICE) ZONED LOT WHERE THE REQUIREMENT IS A MINIMUMOF 60 FEET on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) Ward 3 (Coffin)[PRJ-58948]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015










paper use, backup










ｘㄦ゜

ɱ゜

ㄦ


VAR-59356







SUBJECT:SDR-59357 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO ZON-59354, VAR-59355 AND VAR-59356 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: COMER FAMILYREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Site Development PlanReview FOR THE CONVERSION OF A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO A 1,980SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WIDELANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE EAST PERIMETER WHERE FIFTEEN FEET ISREQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A ZERO-TO-FIVE FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE PERIMETERBUFFER ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH PERIMETERS WHERE EIGHT FEET ISREQUIRED on 0.15 acres at 721 South 8th Street (APN 139-34-810-039) R-1 (Single Family

Residential) [PROPOSED: P-O (Professional Office)] Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-58948].Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 8/19/2015




RECOMMENDATION:







paper use, backup










SDR-59357

07.14.15 final pc packet items 1 to 44

Documents