04 covadis-2019 minoca-final

27
MINOCA Update Approaches to Diagnostic Testing John Beltrame University of Adelaide Central Adelaide Local Health Network Adelaide, Australia

Upload: others

Post on 27-Oct-2021

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA UpdateApproaches to Diagnostic Testing

John Beltrame

University of AdelaideCentral Adelaide Local Health Network

Adelaide, Australia

Page 2: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Agewall et al (2017) Eur Heart J 38:143-53

1. Acute Myocardial Infarction (3rd Universal Definition)Ø Cardiac biomarker – Tn level > 99th percentile + rise and/or fallØ Clinical marker: Ischaemic symptoms – chest pain or angina equivalent

Ischaemic ECG – new: ST/T changes, LBBB, pathological Q wavesIschaemic Imaging – new: loss of viable myocardium or wall motion

2. Non-obstructive Coronaries on Angiography ( <50% lesion)

3. No Clinically Overt Cause for ACS Presentation

Page 3: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

1. Acute Myocardial Infarction (4th Universal Definition)• Cardiac biomarker – Tn level > 99th percentile + rise and/or fall• Corroborative clinical evidence of infarction (at least 1 of following):

Ø Ischaemic symptoms – chest pain or angina equivalentØ Ischaemic ECG – new: ST/T changes, LBBB, pathological Q wavesØ Ischaemic Imaging – new: loss of viable myocardium or wall motionØ Coronary Thrombus – angiography or autopsy

2. Non-obstructive Coronaries on Angiography ( <50% lesion)• Including – normal, mild lesions ( < 30%), moderate (30 to <50%)

3. No Alternate Diagnosis for ACS PresentationTamis-Holland et al (2019) Circulation 139:e891-908

Page 4: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA Prevalence• Pooled 28 publications

Ø AMI + angio findings

Ø consecutive recruitØ at least 100 patientsØ 177,432 AMI patients

• Overall Prevalence7.0% (95%CI: 6%, 8%)

Pasupathy et al (2015) Circulation 131:861

Page 5: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA Comparative CV Risk Factors

27%

22%

39%

45%

32%

24%

21%

15%

42%

52%

21%

43%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Family Hx CAD

Diabetes

Smoking

Hypertension

Hyperlipidaemia

Women

MINOCAMI-CAD

Pasupathy et al (2015) Circulation 131:861

Page 6: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

ANZACS-QI - Barr et al, Williams et al

NCDR – Najib et al, Smilowitz et alCRUSADE – Patel et al, Gehrie et alHORIZONS-AMI – Larsen et alACUITY – Planer et alSingle Site – Turner et al

APPROACH – Larsen et alALBERTA – Bainey et al

SCAAR – Johnston et alSWEDEHEART – Lindahl et al, Baron et al, Eggers et al, Nordenskjold et al

KAMIR – Piao et al, Kang et alSingle Site – Rhew et al

DANISH – Alzuhairi et al

PLACS – Frycz-Kurek et al

Single site – Montenegro et al

Single site – Abdelmonem et al

Single site – Marfella et al, Ciliberti et al

MINOCA Prognosis: Meta-analysis

MINOCA = 79 115 ptsMICAD = 524 030 ptsNon-MI = 33 074 pts

Page 7: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

3.4%

2.5%

3.7%

1.1%

9.4%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

In Hospital 1 month 6 months 12 months

Even

ts (

%)

All cause Mortality Re-MI HF Stroke MACE

MINOCA Prognosis: MACE

Page 8: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA Vs MI-CAD: All Cause Mortality

0.9% 0.8%1.6%

3.4%2.6% 2.8%

3.9%

5.8%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

In Hospital 1 Month 6 Months 12 Months

All-c

ause

Mor

talit

y (%

)

MINOCA MI-CAD

MINOCA (n) 37191 16789 15692 16642

MI-CAD (n) 500520 179766 163684 174461

p<0.001 p<0.001p<0.001

p<0.001

Page 9: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

2.60%

0.70%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

In Hospital 1 Month 6 Months 12 Months

All-C

ause

Mor

talit

y (%

)

MINOCA Non-MI

MINOCA Vs Non-MI: All Cause Mortality

MINOCA (n) 8465 8465 8465 8465

Non-MI (n) 33074 33074 33074 33074

p<0.05 p<0.05

p<0.05 p<0.05

Page 10: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA Comparative Symptom Status

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Baseline 1 month 6 month 12 month

Prev

alen

ce o

f Ang

ina(

%)

MINOCA MI-CAD

Grodzinsky et al (2015) EHJ QCCO 1:92-9

Post-infarct angina occurs in 1/4 MINOCA patients in the following 12 months

Page 11: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Challenges in defining MINOCA

• MINOCA as a generic term (myocardial injury)

Ø Alternative term – TpNOCA(Troponin positive with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries)

• MINOCA as a specific termØ Ischaemic necrosis / true myocardial infarct

Adapted from Pasupathy et al (2017) Circulation 135:1490-3

Page 12: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Troponin Positive Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries

Adapted from Pasupathy et al (2017) Circ 135:1490-3

Cardiac Causes • Myocarditis• Tako-tsubo Syndrome• Other Cardiomyopathies

MINOCA(myocardial infarction)

• Plaque Disruption• Coronary Spasm• Microvascular Dysfunction• Thromboembolism

TpNOCA(myocardial injury)

Extra-Cardiac Causes • Pulmonary embolism• Sepsis• Stroke

Page 13: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

The ‘Traffic Light Approach’ for TpNOCA & MINOCA

Tamis-Holland et al (2019) Circulation 139:e891-908

TpNOCA(myocardial Injury)

MINOCA(myocardial Infarct)

Working Diagnosis

Page 14: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Tn > 99th percentile+

Non-obstructive CAD(< 50% lesion on angiography)

Additional Investigation Alternative DiagnosesCriteria for MINOCA

Review Angiography Findings •Obstructive CAD•SCAD (Dissection)

LV Functional Assessment•Tako-tsubo Syndrome•Other Cardiomyopathies

Consider Clinical Context

•Sepsis•Pulmonary Embolism•Myocarditis•Other Non-ischemic ­cTn

•Plaque Disruption•Thromboembolism

Coronary Vascular Imaging (IVUS, OCT)

•Coronary Artery Spasm •Microvascular Disease

Coronary Functional Assessment

Cardiac MR Imaging (contrast)

•Myocarditis•Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy

MINOCAMyocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive

Coronary Arteries (ischemic mechanisms)

•CMRI-confirmed Infarct

Specific Diagnoses

Exclude:• Missed Obstructive CAD• Myocardial Injury

(Non-ischemic mechanisms)

The ‘Traffic Light Approach’ for TpNOCA & MINOCA

Tamis-Holland et al (2019) Circulation 139:e891-908

Page 15: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Identifying the Causes for ‘MINOCA’ – how far?

Tamis-Holland et al (2019) Circulation 139:e891-908

MINOCA Causes• IVUS• OCT• ACh Spasm• iMR / hMR• Thrombophilia

MINOCA Diagnosis• History• Serial Troponin• ECG• Review Angio• LV Assessment• Cardiac MRI

Page 16: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Thygesen et al (2019) Eur Heart J 40:237-69

Utility of Cardiac MRI in MINOCA• Demonstration of myocardial injury (oedema/inflammation)• Confirmation of myocardial infarction (fibrosis)

Consistent with myocarditis Consistent with myocardial infarction

Page 17: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Pathophysiology - MINOCAChest Pain 30 minutes

↑Serial Troponin T

Potential Myocardial Infarct MechanismsType 1 MI Type-2 MIPlaque Disruption

Plaque Erosion, Rupture↓Myocardial Perfusion

Coronary Spasm, Embolism, MV Dysfunction

↑Myocardial Oxygen DemandSustained Tachyarrhythmia, LVH / Hypertensive

Page 18: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Plaque Disruption in MINOCAPlaque Rupture Benchmark Vascular Imaging Studies:• Stable CAD (IVUS ~1 year postSTEMI) à 4% (HORIZONS-AMI)• STEMI (OCT ~2 hours) à 49% (OCTAVIA)

MINOCA cohort studies• MINOCA (IVUS ~2 days) 50 women à 38%• MINOCA (IVUS, <24 hrs) 68 men & women, à 37%• No angiographically normal pts had plaque disruption (small studies)

Reynolds et al Circ 2011, Ouldzein H et al Ann Cardiol Angeiol 2012, Guagliumi et al JACC Interventions 2014, Souza et al Cor Art Dis 2015

Page 19: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA: Spasm Testing

Montone et al (2018) EHJ 39:91-8

Page 20: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA: Spasm Testing Outcomes

Montone et al (2018) EHJ 39:91-8

Cardiac Death ACS Readmissions

Page 21: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA: Spasm Testing

Montone et al (2018) EHJ 39:91-8

Page 22: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA: Spasm Testing

Probst et al (2019) ESC Congress

Page 23: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

Why Diagnose ‘MINOCA’?• Clinical Recognition

Ø ‘False positive STEMI Diagnosis’

• Clinically differs to Obstructive CADØ Clinical Profile – over-represented in women & youngØ Prognosis – better than MICAD but worse than No-MIØ Mechanisms – spasm, emboli, microvascular dysfunctionØ Therapies – calcium channel blockers, anti-thrombotics

• Evaluation of Underlying CauseØ Extra-cardiac - pulmonary emboli, stroke, sepsisØ Cardiac – Ischaemic vs Non-ischaemic Causes

Page 24: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA: Challenges for COVADIS

• Routine Cardiac MRI

• Routine Spasm Testing in MINOCA?Ø Which patients?Ø When test?

• Role of IVUS / OCT?

• Therapy?

Page 25: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

SWEDEHEART Study• Consecutive AMI pts 2003-2013• MINOCA: AMI Discharge Dx

Angio <50% stenosis• Primary Endpoint: MACE

Ø all-cause mortality Ø Hospitalization ( MI, stroke, heart failure)

• Follow-up: 4.1 years (30d – 2013)

• Stratified propensity analysisØ Dual Anti-platelet AgentsØ StatinsØ ACE-Inhibitors /Ag Receptor BlØ Beta Blockers

Lindahl et al (2017) Circ 135:1481-9

Page 26: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

SWEDEHEART: MINOCA

Lindahl et al (2017) Circ 135:1481-9

MACE RRR: 23% (13-32%)Also: All-cause Mortality (34%)

CV Mortality (41%), Stroke (33%) MACE RRR: 18% (7-27%)

Secondary Endpoints only:• All-cause Mortality (19%) • Acute MI (26%)

Statin ACE Inhibitor/ARB

Beta-Blocker Dual Anti-platelets

Page 27: 04 COVADIS-2019 MINOCA-Final

MINOCA-BAT StudyAcute MI + Non-obstructed Coronaries

b-Blocker⊖ACE-I/ARB⊖

b-Blocker⊕ACE-I/ARB⊖

b-Blocker⊖ACE-I/ARB⊕

b-Blocker⊕ACE-I/ARB⊕

6 week Review: clinical review & medication check

4-year Outcomes: all-cause death, recurrent heart attack, stroke, or heart failure(Recruit = 3,500 MINOCA patients)