02/11/98iso-3d kick-off meeting esprit project n° 28953 interpretation of symbolic objects in 3d...

02/11/98 ISO-3D Kick-Off Meeting

Esprit Project N° 28953

Interpretation of Symbolic Objects in 3D representation

(ISO-3D)(ISO-3D)

Kick-Off Meeting


Objective

To develop a Human Centred Interface methodology and tools which offer a way to analyse and interpret business information from large collection of data.


Consortium organisation

MS&I (F)Prime

CEREMADE (F)Subcontractor

FUNDP (B)Contractor

TGS (F)Contractor

DMSDMS (I)Contractor

INGING (N)Contractor

IMPM (S)Subcontractor

CISIA (F)Subcontractor


Consortium detail

• Name– Matra Systèmes & Information (MS&I)

• Country– France

• Position in the consortium– Prime (Coordinator)

• Part in the consortium– Ergonomics and methodology


Consortium detail

• Name– University of Namur (FUNDP)

• Country– Belgium

• Position in the consortium– Technical leader (Contractor)

• Part in the consortium– 3D Visualisation and Sound


Consortium detail

• Name– University of Naple (DMS)

• Country– Italy

• Position in the consortium– End User & Technical Provider (Contractor)

• Part in the consortium– DM design, 3D Visualisation and RAI

requirements


Consortium detail

• Name– ING Bank (ING)

• Country– Netherlands

• Position in the consortium– End User (Contractor)

• Part in the consortium– Stock market requirements


Consortium detail

• Name– TGS Europe (TGS)


• Position in the consortium– Dissemination leader (Contractor)

• Part in the consortium– 3D library tool provider


Consortium detail

• Name– University PARIS IX Dauphine (CEREMADE)


• Position in the consortium– Technical Provider (Subcontractor)

• Part in the consortium– DM design, DM interpretation and 3D

Visualisation


Consortium detail

• Name– University of Ljubljana (IMPM)

• Country– Slovenia

• Position in the consortium– Technical Provider (Subcontractor)

• Part in the consortium– 3D time & series visualisation


Consortium detail

• Name– (CISIA)


• Position in the consortium– Data Mining Tool Provider (Subcontractor)

• Part in the consortium– DM & data analysis expertise


Work packages

• WP1 : Project management (MS&I)• WP2 : ISO-3D specification (DMS)• WP3 : ISO-3D methodology & tools

(FUNDP)• WP4 : Project evaluation (ING)• WP5 : Exploitation & dissemination (TGS)


WP1 : Project Management (MS&I)

• T1.1 : Administrative management (MS&I)Coordination between partners & communication with Commission

• T1.2 : Technical management (FUNDP)Coordination of technical work and software development and integration


WP2: ISO-3D specification (DMS)

• T2.1 : End user requirements (ING)Definition of the scope of two pilot applications

• T2.2 : State of the art (MS&I)Analysis of technology and methodology background

• T2.3 : Symbolic object generation (DMS)Generation of symbolic object, especially time representation in SO


WP3 : ISO-3D methodology & tools (FUNDP)

• T3.1 : Symbolic object interpretation & design (DMS)

Definition of symbolic object interpretation

• T3.2 : Source code specification (TGS)Definition of all development normalisation aspects (programmation rules, module interfaces, integration code design…)

• T3.3 : ISO-3D graphical library (FUNDP) Development of the graphic and sound library


WP3 : ISO-3D methodology & tools (FUNDP)

• T3.4 : Methodology (MS&I)Definition of a formal methodology based on ergonomics feature

• T3.5 : Software methodology (MS&I)Development of a tool supporting the methodology

• T3.6 : Tool set integration (FUNDP)Integration of the graphic library, the analysis process, the methodology software & the DM tool


WP4 : Project evaluation (ING)

• T4.1 : Pilot application (MS&I)Development of two pilot applications (for ING and for RAI/DMS)

• T4.2 : Benchmark method (ING)Criteria definition for the pilot applications evaluation

• T4.3 : Project result evaluation (ING)Evaluation of the pilot applications


WP5 : Exploitation & Dissemination (TGS)

Definition of the falling of the project in terms of market potential, potential other users outside the consortium, dissemination means– Exploitation plan at Month 3


Planning (1/2)

Nº Nom de la tâche

1 WP1:Project management

2 T1.1 : Adiministrative Management

3 T1.2 : Technival Management

4 WP2 : Users Requirements

5 T2.1 : Users Requirements

6 Deliverables (User requirements, Exploitation plan, Consortium agreement)

7 T2.2 : State of the Art

8 T2.3 : Symbolic Objects Generation

9 Deliverables (State of the Art, SO generation, Cost statement, Technical progress report)

10 WP3 : ISO-3D Methodology & Tools

11 T3.1 : SO Interpretation & Design

12 T3.2 : Source Code Specification

13 Deliverables (SO Interpretation & Design, Source Code Specification)

14 T3.3 : ISO-3D Graphic Library

15 T3.3.1 : GL Development

16 T3.3.2 : Sound Library

17 T3.3.3 : Analysis process

18 Deliverables (ISO-3D graphic library V2.0, ISO-3D graphic library description)

F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N1998 1999 2000


Planning (2/2)


21 Deliverables (ISO-3D Methodology, ISO-3D graphic library V1.0)

22 T3.5 : Methodology Software

23 Deliverables (ISO-3D methodology Software)

24 T3.6 : Tools Set Integration

25 Deliverables (Cost statement, Technical progress report)

26 Deliverables (ISO-3D Library Tool Set, ISO-3D Library User Guide, ISO-3D methodology tool set, ISO-3D methodology user guide)

27 WP4 : Project Evaluation

28 T4.1 : Pilot Demonstrator

29 T4.2 : Benchmark Method

30 Deliverables (Pilot demonstrator, Guideline evaluation report)

31 T4.3 : Project Evaluation

32 WP5 : Exploitation & Dissemination

33 Deliverables (Pilot evaluation report, final cost statement, final technical progress report)

F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N1998 1999 2000


EffortTask Durat MS&I FUNDP IMFM CISIA TGS ING DMS

WP1 24 11,5 6 1 1,5 1T1.1 24 10T1.2 24 1,5 6 1 1,5 1

WP2 6 3 0,5 1 5 0,5 5 7T2.1 3 1,5 2 2T2.2 3 1,5 0,5 1 0,5 0,5 1T2.3 3 4,5 3 4

WP3 12 15 14,5 10 1 5 3 11,5T3.1 2 2 1,5 1 0,5 1,5T3.2 2 1 1,5

T3.3 8 2 10 8 2,5 8,5T3.3.1 5 1 4 5 1,5 5T3.3.2 3 0,5 3 0,5 0,5T3.3.3 3 0,5 3 3 0,5 3

T3.4 5 4 1 0,5T3.5 4 4 1T3.6 3 2 3 1 1 1,5 1

WP4 5 3 2 1 5,5 4,5T4.1 2 2 1,5 1 1,5 2T4.2 2 1 0,5T4.3 3 1 0,5 3 2

WP5 24 1 1 1 2,5 1,5 1

TOTAL 24 33,5 24 12 6 10 16,5 25


Budget (in Ecu)

GLOBAL FUNDINGMS&I 433 200 216 600FUNDP 140 980 140 980IMFM 40 500 40 500CISIA 79 800 39 900TGS 153 900 76 950ING 246 240 123 120DMS 95 000 95 000CEREMADE 76 950 76 950

1 266 570 810 000

Advance = 220000 <=> 27,16%


Discussion


Lunch


Project Organisation

• Project management : meeting each 3 months (or more if necessary) ==> 8 meetings

• Technical management : at the same time & call meeting each two weeks


Project Organisation

• Pack Office Version : office pro 97 (to discuss)

• Web site (to discuss)

• Documentation validation process (to discuss)

• Quality plan (to discuss)


Six Months Work


4 WP2 : Users Requirements

5 T2.1 : Users Requirements

6 Deliverables (User requirements, Exploitation plan, Consortium agreement)

7 T2.2 : State of the Art

8 T2.3 : Symbolic Objects Generation

9 Deliverables (State of the Art, SO generation, Cost statement, Technical progress report)

M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D1998 1999 2000

Project Plan (WP1) MS&I T0User Requirements (WP2) ING T0+3Exploitation Plan (WP5) TGS T0+3

State of the art (WP2) MS&I T0+6SO Generation (WP2) DMS T0+6Cost Statement All T0+6Technical Progress Report All T0+6


Good By; I wish you a good back journey;See you next time

02/11/98iso-3d kick-off meeting esprit project n° 28953 interpretation of symbolic objects in 3d...

Documents

d methodology tools

d methodology tools

methodology software

d representationiso

methodology backgroundt2

formal methodology

methodology msidefinition

d specification dmst2