02 초청강연 유정우(unist)komag.org/2015winter/jwyu.pdf · 2016-01-04 · jacs 116,7243...
TRANSCRIPT
Jung-Woo Yoo
School of Materials Science and EngineeringUlsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)
2015년 동계학술대회
Outline
• Organic Semiconductor as a spin channel
• Organic-based magnet as a spin source
• Graphene – enhancing spin-orbit coupling
Applications:
Read Head, SensorsMRAMSpin-FET, Spin-LEDLogic Device
Phenomena:
GMR/TMRSpin transport and precessionSpin torque and dynamicsSpin-orbit coupling (Spin Hall,Topological Insulator,etc)Spin SeebeckMagnetic excitations (skyrmion,etc)
Why Organic for spintronic applications ?
• Low spin-orbit coupling ( ~ z4)- light constitute atoms, C and H
• Low hyperfine interaction ( ~ )- no nuclear spin in 12C- p electron carriers
• Greater flexibility of processing and new materials- chemical methodology
SI ×l
Spin transporting channel
Spin polarized carrier sources
• Conductivity mismatch• High spin polarization• Introduce greater functionality (magnetic bistability, photo- magnetism)• Greater flexibility of processing and new materials
- chemical methodology
Magnetoresistance of Organic spin valve (Nature 2004)
Organic SpintronicsMeasurement of spin diffusion via mSR (Nature Mater. 2009)
Organic spin-LED (Science 2012) Organic spin charge converter(Nature Mater. 2013)
Schematic Energy Diagram
LSMO Fe
f ~ 4.9 eV
Rubrene
f ~ 4.7 eV
f ~ 3.2 eV
E g ~ 2.3 eV
HOMO
LUMOAre the spins really transport through HOMO or LUMO ?
Need understanding of device characteristic associated with spin injection and transport in OSC !
Spin injection into HOMO and LUMO ?
LSMOLAO seed layer
OSC (Rubrene)Fe 30 nm
5-50 nm1.2 nm50 nm
Device size ~ 200 by 200 mm
PLDThermal depositionE-beam deposition
LSAT
Rubrene (C42H28) : only C & H
LSMO (La2/3Sr1/3MnO3) : well known half-metallic magnet
LAO (LaAlO3) :Improve metal/OSC interfacial quality (PRL 98 016601 (2007))
Organic spin valve
I vs V
T = 10 K
Vb (V)0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10
log10
I (A
)
-11-10
-9-8-7-6-5-4-3
5 nm20 nm30 nm50 nm Instrumental limit
Low bias Rdc
T (K)0 50 100 150 200 250 300
log10
Rdc
5
6
7
8
9
20 nm30 nm50 nm
Tunneling vs Carrier Injection
R vs T
Vb = 0.1 V
T (K)0 50 100 150 200 250 300
log R
(Ohm
)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Instrumental limit
LSMO
Rubrene 5 nm
Rubrene 20 nm
Rubrene 50 nm
Rubrene 20 nm
1000/T (K-1)0 5 10 15 20
log(I) (A
)
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
DataFit
Vb = 0.1 V
Vb = 1 V
Vb = 0.5 V
Thermionic emission
Rubrene : 20 nm
Semiconductor
E
kBT
Metal
Thermionic field emission
Injection limit
Rubrene 50 nm
1000/T (K-1)0 5 10 15 20
log10
(I) (A)
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
DataFit
Vb = 1 VVb = 0.5 V
Vb = 0.1 V
Instrumental limit
As T h a I ha thermionic emission
Bulk limit
Variable range hopping
Rubrene : 50 nm
Positive bias(LSMO +, Fe –)
Negative bias(LSMO +, Fe –)
Rubrene = 5 nm
Spin valve with thin OSC layer (TMR)
MR vs Vb
H (Oe)-1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500
MR
(%)
-202468
101214
V = 1 mV10 mV50 mV100 mV150 mV200 mV300 mV
MR vs Vb
H (Oe)-1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500
MR
(%)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12 V = 1 mV10 mV50 mV100 mV150 mV200 mV300 mV
Yoo et al., PRB (2009)
H (Oe)-1000 -500 0 500 1000
MR
(%)
-202468
101214
T = 10 KT = 50 KT = 100 KT = 150 K
Vb = 1 V
H (Oe)-1000 -500 0 500 1000
MR
(%)
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
10 K50 K100 K
MR vs T
T (K)0 50 100 150 200 250 300
MR
(%)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14Rubrene 5 nm,Vb = 10 mVRubrene 20 nm,Vb = 1 VRubrene 30 nm,Vb = 0.6 V
TMR
GMR
TMR vs GMRRubrene 5 nm
Rubrene 20 nm
Yoo et al., PRB (2009)
Surface spin polarization profile of LSMO
PRL 81 1953 (1998)
TMR vs GMR
MR vs Vb
Vb (V)0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
MR
(%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Rubrene 20 nmRubrene 30 nm
MR vs Vb
Vb (V)-0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
MR
(%)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
T = 20 K
Rubrene 5 nm Rubrene 20 nm
• TMR for thin rubrene layer (t = 5 nm)- Positive MR for all T and Vb , spin selective tunneling for thin layer
• GMR for thick rubrene layer (t > 20 nm)- Strong T dependence- Positive MR at high Vb- At low T, only high Vb limit is the current through the HOMO and LUMO
• Thermionic Field Emission
• For d = 20 nm a Injection a MR
• For d = 50 nm a bulk a no MR
Field emission
Thermionic Emission
Thermionic Field Emission
Yoo et al., PRB (2009)
Electrical bistability
Yoo et al., Org. Electron. (2010)
Bistable spin valve
Yoo et al., Org. Electron. (2010)
Two Channel Model(a) (b)
Ri Rh
RhRhRh
RiRi
Ri
(c) (d)
Ri Rh
RhRhRh
RiRi
RiRh;N
Ri;N
Rh;N
Ri;N
Rh Rh
Ri Ri
Rh Ri
Ri Rh
For rubrene 20 nm device a injection limited and interface R dominate device current
By adding insulating barrier or schottky barrier
For t > 50 nm, a injection limited, but bulk R dominated device currenta conductivity mismatch, hopping transport, thermionic emission !
Schmidt et al. PRB (2000)
Spin polarized carrier sources
• Conductivity mismatch• High spin polarization• Introduce greater functionality (magnetic bistability, photo- magnetism)• Greater flexibility of processing and new materials
- chemical methodology
Molecular magnets as a spin source ?
Molecule-based Magnets
• Building block : Molecular units
• Spins in p, s orbitals as well as d orbitals
• Magnetic interaction : superexchange, direct exchange, dipolar
• Spin polarized valence and conduction bands
• Low-T synthesis
• Modulation/tuning of properties by means of organic chemistry- Tc, Hc
- Magnetic ordering (ferro-, ferri-, antiferro-, spin glass) - Dimensions (1-D, 2-D, 3-D)- Types of spin (Ising, XY, Heisenberg)
M(TCNE)x magnets (x ~ 2)V
V
C
C
C
N
N
C
C
C
N
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
N N
TCNQ
TCNB TCNP
JACS 116,7243 (1994)
C C
C
C
C
C
NN
NN
• Building block: Tetracyanoethylene (TCNE)M = V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni
• Modulation of magnetic properties:MxM1-x(TCNE)yS2-y, S = CH3CN, THF
• Photo-induced magnetism: Mn(TCNE)2, V(TCNE)2Yoo et al., PRL 97, 247205 (2006)Yoo et al., PRL 99, 157205 (2007)
• Magnetic bubble in 2D layer : [Fe(TCNE)(NCMe)]Yoo et al., PRL 101, 197206 (2008)
• V(TCNE)x~2, room temperature magnetic semi-con.- Tc ~ 400 K, sRT ~ 10-2 S/cm- Ferrimagnetic order with net spin S = ½ (V2+ : S = 3/2, [TCNE]– : S = 1/2)
• low-T CVD film growth (Pokhodnya et al. Adv. Mater. (2000))
V
Half Semiconductor
Both spatially and energetically separated spin subbandsJ.-W. Yoo et al., Nature Mater. 9, 638 (2010)
a desired properties for the spin polarizer in the spintronic applications
Organic-based Magnet as a Spin Injector
LSMOLAO seed layer
OSC (Rubrene)Fe 30 nm
5-50 nm1.2 nm50 nm
Device size ~ 200 by 200 mm
PLDThermal depositionE-beam deposition
LSAT
Organic-based Magnet as a Spin Injector
LSMOLAO seed layer
OSC (Rubrene)V(TCNE)x
5 nm1.2 nm50 nm
Device size ~ 200 by 200 mm
PLDThermal deposition
LSAT
CVD deposited V(TCNE)x film~ 500 nm
Organic-based Magnet as a Spin Injector
LSMOLAO seed layer
OSC (Rubrene)V(TCNE)x
5 nm1.2 nm50 nm
Device size ~ 200 by 200 mm
PLDThermal deposition
LSAT
CVD deposited V(TCNE)x film~ 500 nm
DR/R vs H
T = 100 KVb = 0.5 V
H (Oe)-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300
Magnetoresistance (%
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
M vs HV(TCNE)x
M vs HLSMO
0
1
-1
M(a. u.)
J.-W. Yoo et al., Nature Mater. 9, 638 (2010)
Hybrid Magnetic Tunnel Junction
DR/R vs H
T = 100 KVb = 0.5 V
H (Oe)-400 -200 0 200 400
Magnetoresistance (%
)
0
1
2
3LAO(3u.c.)LAO/Rubrene(3u.c.)/(5 nm)
I vs V
Vb (V)-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
I (mA)
-100
-50
0
50
100
T = 100 KT = 120 KT = 140 KT = 160 KT = 180 KT = 200 K
R vs 1000/T
1000/T (K-1)4 6 8 10
logR
(Ohm
)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Vb = 0.1 VVb = 0.2 VVb = 0.5 V
Resistance (Ohm)104 105 106 107 108
MR
(%)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5Rubrene (5 nm)LAO (3 u. c.)LAO(3 u.c.)/Rubrene (5 nm)
Temperature dependence of MR
Vb = 0.5 V
T (K)50 100 150 200 250
MR
(%)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
LAO/Rubrene(3 u.c.)/(5 nm)LAO(3 u.c.)
Surface spin polarization of LSMO
Hc vs T
Hc (Oe)-200 -100 0 100 200
T (K)
100
150
200V(TCNE)x LSMO
Rubrene (5 nm)/LAO (3 u.c.) hybrid barrier
Vb = 0.5 V
H (Oe)-200 -100 0 100 200
Magnetoresistance (%
)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
90 K100 110120130150
LAO (3 u.c.) barrier
Vb = 0.5 V
H (Oe)-200 -100 0 100 200
Magnetoresistance (%
)
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7 90 K100110120130
Hybrid barrier Single LAO barrier
1000/T2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Norm
alized resistance (W
cm)
102103104105106107108109101010111012
Normalized Device Resistance
Thermionic field emission
Device resistance
V(TCNE)x bulk
1000/T2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Norm
alized resistance (W
cm)
102103104105106107108109101010111012
Injection Bulk
~ 100 K
Normalized Device Resistance
Organic/Molecular Spintronics
- High spin polarization- Introduce greater functionality
(magnetic bistability, photo-magnetism)- Conductivity mismatch- Greater flexibility of processing and new materials
- chemical methodology
SI ×l- Weak spin-orbit coupling ( ~ z4)- Weak hyperfine interaction ( ~ )- Greater flexibility of processing and new materials
- chemical methodology
- Spin dependent resonant tunneling through the discrete molecular level
• Spin transporting through the organic thin film
• Spin transporting/filtering through the molecular unit
• Spin filtering via organic-based magnet
Graphene
)( yyxxF kkvH ss +±» h
Spin transport in GrapheneNature 448, 571 (2007)
In experimental observation
a μm 21~ -sl ps 100~st
Extremely long spin diffusion have been expected ( )mm 21~ -sl
Strains and ripples, moments from edges and adatom…….
Spin orbit coupling in graphene
Spin-orbit coupling in pristine graphene
~D
Chemical methods
Physical methods
μeV20 Phys. Rev. B 82. 245412 (2010)
Hydrogenation, Fluorination, etc
Phys. Rev. Lett. 110. 246602 (2013)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 103. 026804 (2009)
Carbon. 48. 1405 (2010)
Nature Physics 9. 284 (2013)
Decoration with heavy atom (Au, Pt, W, In, etc)
Proximity effect (WS2, WSe2, etc)
Phys. Rev. B. 77. 235430 (2008)
Phys. Rev. B. 90. 035444 (2014)
Nature Comm. 5, 4875 (2014)
Nature Comm. 5. 4748 (2014)Nature Comm. 3. 1232 (2012)
Enhancing Spin-orbit coupling in graphene ( )VkH soso Ñ´×= sh
Non-local measurement for spin diffusion
PRB, 79, 035304 (2009)
Generation(spin Hall effect)
sq ´CSHS JJ ~
Detection(inverse spin Hall effect)
sq ´SSHC JJ ~
The non-local resistance induced byspin Hall effect and spin diffusion
S
L
SSH
CNL ew
IVR l
lrq
-
== 212
21
ü Spin current without ferromagnet
Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 166601 (2009)
1 µm
w = 110 nm t = 60 nm
a) In diffusive limit, wle <<
c) In ballistic limit, wle >>
b) Spin Hall regime, se lwl <<<<
a
a
a
S
L
SSH
CNL ew
IVR l
lrq
-
== 212
21
Negative signal
wLsqNL eROhmicR /)( p-= L/w > 3
Enhancing spin orbit coupling in graphene
Au pad
Au adatoms
sq ´CSHS JJ ~ sq ´SSHC JJ ~
The non-local resistance induced byspin Hall effect and spin diffusion
S
L
SSH
CNL ew
IVR l
lrq
-
== 212
21
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 300
1
2
3
4
Vg(V)
r xx(k
W)
300 K
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
s (m
S)
CVD graphene ~ 2000 cm2/Vs
-40 -20 0 20 40 60
1
2
3300 K
Vg(V)
I d(mA)
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6300 K
Vg(V)
I d(mA)
Au adatoms Au pad
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15-20
-10
0
10
20
Inverse way
300 K
Vg = 0V
I(mA)V nl
(mV)
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
-4
-2
0
2
4 300 K
I(mA)
V nl(m
V)
Vg = 0V
-10 -5 0 5 10
-4
-2
0
2
4
300 K
Vg = 0V
I(mA)
V nl(m
V)
Non-local signalLocal
CVD garphene
Non-local
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20
0
1
2
3
V nl (m
V)
Metal pad Pristine
Vg-Vd (V)
300KIs= 1 mA
Non-local signalGate dependence Non-local Resistance
-10 -5 0 5 10
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
Vg = 0V 300 K
I(mA)V nl
(mV)
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
0
1
2
3
4
5
Vg(V)
V nl(m
V)
Dirac pointIs= 20 mA300K
Non-local Resistance induced by thermal effect
Au pad
Acknowledgment
Advisor : Prof. Arthur J. Epstein
Collaborators :
The Ohio State University
Dr. V. N. PrigodinDr. N. RajuDr. C.-Y. ChenDr. C. KaoDr. B. LiDr. D. P. Pejakovic
University of Wisconsin
Prof. C. B. EomProf. H. W. JangProf. C. W. Bark
University of Wisconsin
Prof. J. S. MillerDr. V. Pohkodnya
Group Members
me
Jungmin Park:Graphene Spintronics
Mi-Jin Jin:LAO/STO
Junhyun Jo:Organic Spintronics
Vijayakumar:Spin transport in nanowire
Dae-Sung ChoiOxide Interface
In-Sun OhThermoelectricity