0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1996199719981999 homeworkprojectfinal measures (grades)
Post on 21-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1996 1997 1998 1999
Homework Project FinalMeasures (grades)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
1996 1997 1998 1999
UG Honors GradCombined class makeup
Initial evaluation (Analysis)• results– homework (and overall) grades improved substantially– distribution of grades also narrowed substantially
• comments– may partially result from an observed improvement in the
overall performance of our undergraduate students– the addition of the problem-solving sessions was valuable
(and was one of the goals of the framework)– change is dramatic enough, however, to indicate that the
framework was effective
Initial evaluation (1997-98)• on-campus students – primarily used MANIC materials for review and while working on
homework assignments– supported by our analysis of the MANIC logs
• 45 minutes per MANIC session• 50% used the text-only features (not the audio track)• the average time on play-out was 7 minutes
– the search/index capability of MANIC particularly useful in locating materials related to specific assignments
– online audio material useful in “filling in the gaps”– had load and bandwidth problems
• off-campus– MANIC presentations user-friendlier than videotapes because of
the index/search capability– had problems with security and firewalls
anecdotal evidence and MANIC log analysis
Initial evaluation (1999 Questionnaire) • Utilization– 82% used text, “coursepacks” and copies of the overhead
transparencies• 29% found the text, “coursepacks” useful• 88-89% found overhead copies useful
– 59% used MANIC units• 90% found MANIC useful• 60-70% used MANIC for review and homework
– but preferring to look first at printed material– MANIC superior to the printed and on-line Power Point slides, because of
the detail added by the audio track
• Satisfaction– students were quite satisfied with the courses– too much material– liked the “problem solving” sessions– 24% said that class attendance was affected
• but it provided a level of comfort, not a temptation
Attended class Most of the time Once/week Infrequently MANIC affect?59% 24% 18% 24%
Used Text/handout MANIC Videotape82% 53% 59% 18%
Useful Not useful % usedText/course-pack 29% 65% 47%Handouts 88% 12% 100%Online Power Point 89% 11% 53%MANIC 90% 10% 59%Videotape 67% 33% 18%
Replace class Review Homework SupplementalUsed MANIC for 30% 70% 60% 30%
Office hours email Web MANICFor questions, used: 50% 44% 65% 53%
Questionnaire