kclpure.kcl.ac.uk file · web viewprovision of specialist continuing care services for older adults...
TRANSCRIPT
Provision of Specialist Continuing Care Services for Older Adults across the UK
Article key words: service evaluation, continuing care
Running title: Literature review and current service provision
Dr Josie Jenkinson (corresponding author)
Address: Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Box P070, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark
Hill, London SE5 8AF
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7848 0508
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7848 0632
Professor Robert Howard
Address: Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Box P070, Institute of Psychiatry,
Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark
Hill, London SE5 8AF
Email: [email protected]
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7848 0508
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7848 0632
1
Abstract
Background
Older people with mental health problems who meet needs based criteria for
National Health Service continuing care funding may be cared for in a variety of
settings. These services have evolved due to socioeconomic and political pressure,
with the extent of movement of care from traditional NHS run long stay units into
the private sector being unclear. Little attention has been paid to the best model of
service provision for this group in terms of quality of care, patient outcomes and cost
effectiveness.
Methods
A literature review was conducted in order to explore what is known about service
models for long-term psychiatric care for older people and their cost effectiveness.
Following this review, an online survey was conducted in order to establish current
specialist continuing care service provision by provider organisations, as well as any
planned developments in services.
Results
The way specialist mental health continuing care services are provided in the UK
varies, with just 45% (33) of NHS providers still operating their own services.
Specialist mental health continuing care is an area of current service review for a
number of organisations.
Conclusions
Specialist care services for older adults with mental health problems in the UK are
changing, but there is a lack of research on models of service delivery for this group
of vulnerable individuals with complex needs. In the context of financial pressures
2
within the NHS, and an increasing awareness of the need to develop and improve
quality of services both for those with dementia and other mental illnesses, an
urgent need for further research in this area is identified.
Introduction
Specialist continuing care services for older adults are an example of long-term care
provision, one of the key elements of old age psychiatric services nationally
(Banerjee and Chan, 2005). Service models for the long term care of the elderly
mentally ill are varied and operate in a mixed economy of health care, with varying
degrees of involvement of the private and third sectors and overlap with social
services arrangements (Banerjee and Chan, 2005 ; Challis, 2002 ; Ryan, 2005). Older
people under the care of long-term old age psychiatric services are a heterogeneous
group; including people with dementia, late onset mental illness, so-called
‘graduates’ with long-term mental illness as well as those who suffer from both
dementia and other mental illness (Banerjee and Chan, 2005 ; Jolley, 2004 ; Mann,
1976). In addition, older adults are more likely to have physical health problems,
increasing the complexity of their presentation and management (Banerjee and
Chan, 2005). Most will have their care funded by National Health Service continuing
care arrangements due to their high level of need (DH, 2007; 2012a). Bearing in mind
the global trend towards deinstitutionalisation of psychiatric care, it could be argued
that the provision of long term care services for the elderly by mental health trusts is
one area in which considerable quality improvements and cost efficiency savings
could be made. This is particularly topical in the context of current financial
pressures on the UK NHS, as long-term care services account for a large proportion
3
of spending within mental health services for older adults. This paper explores what
is currently known about service models for the delivery of long term psychiatric
care in older adults and their cost effectiveness, and also presents the results of a
survey into the current provision of long term specialist care services by NHS
organisations in the UK. A literature review was conducted by means of an online
search of Pubmed, Medline, Cinahl, Psycinfo, and NHS Evidence databases. Search
terms used were as follows: continuing care service models mental health,
continuing care psychiatry, continuing care psychogeriatrics, costs of continuing
care, costs of long term care, discharge from long term care, and relocation of the
elderly.
NHS Continuing Care
In the United Kingdom (UK), continuing care funding is provided by the National
Health Service (NHS) for people of any age with complex care needs who meet
specific criteria determined nationally by the Department of Health (DH, 2012a).
Some people under the care of old age psychiatry services will meet these criteria
due to their on-going mental health needs, and will require long-term care (Banerjee
and Chan, 2005). Within an old age psychiatric service these are likely to be people
who have dementia with accompanying behavioural disturbance, or those with long-
term functional mental illness and on-going management problems, often towards
the end of their lives. (RCPsych, 2006b). Comorbid physical health problems may also
be present, and contribute to the complexity of the individual’s needs. Importantly,
NHS Continuing Care funding places no restrictions on the settings in which the
4
package of support can be offered or on the model of service delivery (DH, 2012b); in
practice care is provided in a range of settings, including NHS long stay units and
facilities operated by private providers (RCPsych, 2006a).
In April 2013, the Health and Social Care Act (2011) was fully implemented, with
commissioning responsibilities moving from Primary Care Trusts to the newly formed
Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and the NHS Board, and Strategic Health
Authorities were abolished. CCGs are now the bodies legally responsible for both
NHS continuing care eligibility decisions and the arrangement of services required to
meet their needs (DH, 2012b), in accordance with the National Framework for
Continuing Healthcare (DH, 2007). This framework includes a Decision Support Tool
(DST), which standardises the process for needs assessment and decision-making
regarding eligibility for NHS Continuing Care funding, and also sets out guidelines for
review of eligibility at both 3 months after initial assessment and a minimum of
yearly intervals thereafter.
Service models of long term psychiatric care for the elderly
Studies of service provision of long term psychiatric care have tended to focus on
working age adults rather than older people with mental illness (Hellman, 1988 ;
Thornicroft, 2005 ; Trieman, 1996; 2002a; b), and the majority of studies that have
been conducted solely in older adults focus on service models of dementia care
exclusively
5
(Brodaty, 2003 ; Carr, 1993 ; Comas-Herrera et al., 2011 ; Green et al., 1997 ; Holmes
et al., 1990 ; Jonsson, 2004 ; Macdonald and Cooper, 2007 ; Roberts et al., 2000 ;
Rovner et al., 1996 ; Wimo, 1995). There is a lack of comparative evaluation of
models of psychogeriatric care in terms of effectiveness and cost (Banerjee and
Chan, 2005). However the body of research in this area has been increasing over the
last two decades (Draper, 2000) despite acknowledgment that research in this area
is difficult methodologically (Mccrae, 2010).
De-institutionalisation within psychiatric services has been the focus of mental
health policy in many geographical regions over the last quarter of a century
including in the UK (Mangen, 1994 ; Monroe-Devita, 1999 ; Prince, 2007), and the
effects of this have been well documented (Prince, 2007 ; Trieman, 1996; 2002a; b ;
Who, 2004). The Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services (TAPS) Project
(Leff, 2000) conducted a series of observational studies of long stay patients moved
during planned hospital closures according to national policy at the time. Movement
into the community resulted in positive outcomes for patients in terms of social
functioning, behaviour and quality of life (Leff, 2000 ; Trieman, 1996; 2002a). All bar
one of these studies included solely working age adults without dementia, although
the mean age of some of these cohorts was in the early 60’s (Trieman, 1996) which
may make some of this work more relevant to the older adult population.
TAPS Project 30 specifically explored outcomes (but not costs) of the psychogeriatric
hospital population post discharge from long stay hospital wards (Trieman, 1997).
6
Surveys of the psychogeriatric populations in two hospitals revealed that the
majority of the 89 patients in one hospital had organic disorders, with most of these
suffering from Alzheimer’s dementia. Of the 214 long stay patients in the other
hospital aged over 70 years, most were originally diagnosed as having functional
illness (the majority of these had schizophrenia). Importantly, many of the functional
patients were also found to have severe cognitive impairment, with a ‘mixed type of
morbidity in which dementia had apparently superseded the original illness’
(Trieman, 1997) later described by the authors as a ‘functional-mixed-organic
continuum’.
The project went on to compare the quality of care for patients based in community
facilities versus those remaining in long stay wards; overall quality of care was found
to be higher in the community. One key recommendation was that when planning
new facilities, attempts must be made to avoid a mixture of elderly functionally ill
patients with patients suffering from dementia; for the reason that mixed
compositions may ‘reduce the “graduates” to the lowest common level of
functioning’ (Trieman, 1997) and the expectation that those with functional illness
are more likely to have any deterioration in cognition and behaviour reduced to a
minimum in the right environment. These conclusions would seem highly relevant to
any future developments of specialist continuing care services; however TAPS
Project 30 was limited by two key factors. Firstly, patients in the community facilities
had already been discharged from long term hospital wards; and this earlier
discharge might suggest they were likely to have been considered less complex to
7
start with (Leff, 2000). The study also did not use any standardised outcome
measures for quality of care or quality of life.
International and European perspective
A report by the World Health Organisation’s Health Evidence Network (Who, 2004)
highlighted a lack of studies evaluating models of old age specific mental health care,
and a need for further research. The authors stated that ‘while community
residences for long term institutional care appear to offer better quality care than
hospitals, it is unclear whether there are particular patients who require long term
psychogeriatric hospitalisation’. (Who, 2004). Whilst the WHO is unclear, others have
stated clear opinions that some patients will always need long term hospitalisation
due the severity and complexity of their illness (Macpherson, 2004).
Dementia Specialist care units (SCUs) are an example of a service model for long
term care particularly popular in the USA (Holmes et al., 1990). Evidence with regard
to outcomes has been mixed (Roberts et al., 2000) and generally research on SCUs
has been varied in quality, tending to be based on small studies using different
outcome measures, with several sources of bias identified (Sloane, 1995). SCUs set
up in Italy have reported reduced use of psychotropics and reduced behavioural
disturbance at six months follow-up compared with hospital admission (Bellelli,
1998). In a descriptive study of available services in Sweden, Annerstedt (1996)
called for broader research on the effects of differentiation in dementia care and
8
argued that patients on long stay wards may become suitable for nursing home care
due to deterioration in dementia and decreased mobility. One Australian
randomized controlled study on specialized long-term care for dementia (Wells,
1987) found evidence that relatives of residents in specialised care had improved
psychological health as opposed to those admitted into non specialised institutional
care; and that costs of care were reduced mainly due to lower hospitalisation rates,
however this finding has not been reproduced by any other studies. A number of
studies argue for the effectiveness of psychogeriatric outreach services to nursing
homes (Bartels, 2002 ; Draper, 1998 ; Fischer, 2011), particularly as nursing home
environments have been found to have difficulty in meeting the needs of more
complex patients (Martin et al., 2002).
Cost effectiveness studies
The TAPS studies considered the move from long stay hospitals into the community
to have been successful in terms of improved outcomes and reduced costs (Leff,
2000); but follow up periods were limited. One study (Beecham, 2004) involved
much longer follow up than the TAPS studies (12 years as opposed to 1-5 years) and
looked at 75 former long stay patients and their outcomes. This study found that
most people lived in staffed accommodation supported by community services, with
mean care costs lower than long stay hospital costs. With regard to the long term
care of working age adults, Knapp (1993) argues that community based services do
not necessarily reduce costs, as often these are redistributed to other budgets and
9
agencies. He agrees that quality of care, quality of life and patient satisfaction are
usually improved for patients in the community.
Few studies have looked specifically at both outcomes and costs of long term care
services for the elderly and mentally ill. One cohort study looked at the costs of
‘domus care’ in South East London (Beecham, 1993). The ‘domus’ model of care was
viewed as being a community based home as opposed to a long-term psychiatric unit
(Dean, 1993). Costs of care in the community were found to be marginally greater
than costs in the long stay ward. Unfortunately this study was too small to link with
any specific outcomes based data, but qualitative data (Dean, 1993) indicated
improvements in quality of life for residents after moving. These studies looked at
two ‘domuses’ which were run by local authorities with some psychiatric service
input; one unit housed residents with ongoing severe mental illness, and the other
housed patients with dementia. Movement of patients from long stay wards into
these domuses resulted in increased cognitive abilities for those with dementia
(Dean, 1993) and other improvements for those with schizophrenia, including higher
levels of global social functioning. Importantly, both these domuses were later
regarded as specialist continuing care units, commissioned by local care
commissioning groups (CCGs) from a mental health trust, and have now both closed.
The effect of relocation on elderly patients
The studies discussed above did not report increased mortality rates amongst
patients discharged from long stay units; however there is a body of evidence that
10
shows that relocation can have negative impacts on the elderly (Castle, 2001),
including increased mortality rates on moving from institution to institution (Aldrich,
1963 ; Killian, 1970). Not all studies have found this to be the case (Danermark,
1996). Degree of physical frailty has been identified as a possible predictor of
increased mortality (Killian, 1970). This issue is likely to be highly relevant to any
changes in long term service provision for the continuing care population in the UK.
Summary
There is some evidence that community based care for long term psychogeriatric
patients is more cost effective than long stay wards, however this is limited in terms
of being specific either to the deinstitutionalisation movement or purely dementia
care. The literature tends to separate service models into dementia care and other
long term psychogeriatric services and this could be seen to reflect an underlying
view that there is a need for different models of service provision for people with
dementia and those with other mental illness, whether it is late onset or
longstanding in nature. What is unclear is which services are most appropriate for
those people who have both ongoing mental illness and dementia; and whether or
not this group could be effectively cared for in a dementia care setting that is
equipped to deal with severe behaviour disturbance. Further work is required to add
to the body of evidence available on both the costs and outcomes of discharging a
very specific and vulnerable group of patients, as well as exploring which factors may
predict positive outcomes.
Background to survey
11
Specialist continuing care services are under review at the South London and
Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM), as an area for improvement of quality of
care and patient outcomes. At the time of writing, SLaM provided approximately 60
specialist continuing care beds in 3 standalone specialist care units across 3 inner
London boroughs for older adults. In order to gain a national perspective, we sought
to explore to what extent NHS mental health service providers in the UK are still
providing their own specialist continuing care services for older adults. Of particular
interest is whether or not organisations are planning to reduce or expand existing
services, or to develop new services in the light of recent changes in UK health
services commissioning and the pressure to make efficiency savings.
Key survey questions
What proportion of NHS mental health service providers in the UK still
provide specialist continuing care services for older adults?
How are these services provided?
Are NHS organisations planning to reduce or expand these services?
Methods
Using the Royal College of Psychiatrists membership database, all consultant old age
psychiatrists in the UK were contacted with a link to an electronic survey. Survey
questions regarding specialist continuing care services were included amongst other
questions regarding older adults’ mental health services being asked as part of a wider
review of service provision. Respondents were asked which organisation they worked
for, whether or not their organisation ran its own specialist care service; and if not,
how this service was provided (e.g. by third or private sector). They were also asked if
12
their employing organisations had any plans to develop such services. Options were
given as well as free text comments box for each question. A reminder email was sent
after 4 weeks, and a deadline of 8 weeks was set for completion of the survey.
Respondents were asked to provide contact details in order to clarify information in
cases where unclear or conflicting responses had been given.
Results
As per Figure 1 below, 415 responses were received from a sampling frame of 1126
consultant old age psychiatrists (37%). 81 (20%) of the 415 surveyed said that they
worked in continuing care services either wholly or partially; with 163 (68.5%)
reporting that they thought that these services were necessary.
Figure 1 inserts here
NHS mental health services for older people in the UK are provided by 80 different
organisations (56 Mental Health Trusts in England, 12 Health Boards in Scotland, 7
University Health Boards in Wales and 5 Health and Social Care Trusts in Northern
Ireland). 91% (73) of these organisations were represented by the 415 survey
responses received. As the organisations were not represented proportionately (i.e.
some organisations had more responders than others) the data were analysed
having filtered the responses by organisation. Of the organisations represented, 33
(45%) provided specialist continuing care services and 40 (55%) did not. Further
13
detail on these services and plans to expand or reduce them is given in Table 1
below.
Table 1 inserts here
Of the 33 NHS organisations that did provide specialist continuing care services, 12
also had patients being cared for in the private or third sector in addition to the
service provided by the mental health trust/health board/university health board. Of
the 33 that did provide services, 13 were reported to be planning to stop (4) or
reduce (9) existing services. Just 2 were planning to expand their services.
In the 40 organisations that did not provide any specialist continuing care services,
placements were provided either in private care homes (35) third sector care homes
(5), as well as some spot purchasing of beds in the private sector or within other NHS
organisations (5). Just four of these organisations (10%) had reported plans to start a
specialist care service.
The majority of organisations that did not run their own specialist care services
placed patients within the private sector, although a small number referred to the
third sector, or out of area specially commissioned placements. Many of the free text
comments provided referred to this causing additional pressure on acute inpatient
services due to difficulties with delayed discharges. Several organisations reported
14
having access to ‘Challenging Behaviour Units’ for people with dementia, which do
not appear to be funded by continuing care funding but provide more of a
rehabilitation type model before discharge into a community placement. Others
referred to running in-reach services for private or local authority nursing homes to
provide additional support for people with complex care needs.
Limitations
Not all organisations providing mental health services were represented in this
survey, however the majority were. Response bias is possible in that consultants may
have been more likely to give additional information on services if they thought they
were sub standard or excellent. Information gathered was dependent on consultants
having accurate knowledge of existing service models and planned changes within
their organisations. Data was triangulated by direct contact with trusts in some cases
where responses were contradictory or unclear, however this was not done in all
cases. A question asking whether services are being redesigned would have been
helpful as several respondents reported that services were going to both expand and
reduce; this could refer to areas in which a service is being redesigned, as is the case
with South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.
Discussion
Survey results confirm that there is variation in how specialist continuing care
services are provided in the UK, with no set model of service delivery, and that most
15
(55%) of NHS mental health service providers do not provide any of their own
specialist continuing care services for older adults.
Whereas previously individuals may have stayed on long stay units for many years,
regular review of needs and eligibility for funding using the DST is likely to encourage
discharge into non specialist community placements e.g. nursing homes. This is due
to both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, as well as the likely
change in presentation and reduction in behavioural disturbances secondary to the
inevitable deterioration in those individuals with dementia. As a result of this the
complexity of needs of patients within specialist care services are likely to increase,
as those who no longer meet needs based criteria are discharged. This will impact on
necessary staffing levels and expertise within existing services.
Over recent years there has been an increasing focus on quality within healthcare as
well as the culture of care (Francis, 2013) and a number of scandals in long-term care
institutions have led to a particular focus on care homes and elderly dementia care.
Changes in commissioning of services following the 2011 Health and Social Care Act
and an expansion of the role of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are likely to lead
to more scrutiny of current provision of services, and may require complex
commissioning arrangements due to relatively small numbers of people requiring
specialist long term continuing care services. It is possible that NHS organisations will
be deterred from running long stay units due to the costs and quality of care issues
16
inherent in these services, particularly for relatively small numbers of individuals
who are now going to meet eligibility criteria in the long term.
Evaluating the effectiveness of service models in old age psychiatry is complex and
frequently not undertaken (Banerjee, 2012). In the absence of clear evidence as to
the best model for providing specialist continuing care services, cost pressures rather
than quality of care may well be the predominant driver in the further evolution on
these services. Interestingly, a Canadian systematic review on continuing care
services for dementia sufferers found that there was benefit to receiving care in
specialist units compared with non-specialised institutional care, and that costs of
care were reduced mainly due to lower hospitalisation rates (Roberts et al., 2000).
Two of the organisations reporting that specialist continuing care services were
being developed referred to this as a business opportunity, to avoid having to make
spot purchases of placements, and to make money from other organisations
purchasing continuing care placements from them.
The British Geriatrics Society issued guidance advising that geriatric medicine and old
age psychiatry should be ‘re-engaged in a structured manner within the care home
population’ and that no individual should enter institutional care without having had
access to an effective multidisciplinary and specialist assessment system with
appropriate treatment and rehabilitation (Bgs, 2004). One possible model for
patients with dementia who are eligible for NHS continuing care is a rehabilitation
17
model with additional community support services to allow people to exit long-term
care units. Specialised challenging behaviour units for patients with dementia which
focus on trying to transition patients back into the community rather than keeping
them on inpatient units are already established in some areas; care home support
teams to provide specialist input for patients with mental health needs in
community placements are also under development in some organisations.
Increasing attention has been focussed on dementia care, including continuing care
provision for those with dementia, but less on the long term care of the elderly with
long term functional illness, an issue highlighted by Green et al. (1997). Patients who
have been detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act are eligible for Section
117 aftercare – also funded by the NHS. It may be that for some patients who do not
meet continuing care eligibility criteria this can be used as an alternative. There is a
paucity of information available on the characteristics of patients who currently
receive specialist continuing care funding for mental health reasons.
In summary, the results of the survey indicate that where NHS run specialist care
services still exist, they are more likely to be being cut than developed from scratch
and this is an area of service review for many organisations. What is not yet clear is
how these services are to be replaced and the effect of current patients on these
changes to service delivery. There is evidence to suggest that discharging long stay
patients leads to negative outcomes (Mccrae, 2011). This raises important questions
as to how best to manage these changes for this very vulnerable group of patients
18
with varying and complex needs, as well as highlighting the fact that the type of care
that is available will vary depending on region within the UK. The effect of closing or
developing services on both quality of care and cost measures needs to be assessed
where possible, particularly as there is a lack of research in this area and no known
best model of service delivery. More research is needed on both the characteristics
of patients within old age psychiatric services who meet criteria for NHS continuing
care funding and the effectiveness of different models of service delivery.
Conflict of Interest
None
Description of Authors’ Roles
Dr Josie Jenkinson: Conducted survey and literature review.
Professor Robert Howard: Advised on literature review methods, presentation of
results and subsequent discussion.
Acknowledgments
Dr James Warner, Chair of Faculty of Old Age Psychiatry, Royal College of
Psychiatrists.
References
19
Aldrich, C. M., E. (1963). Relocation of the aged and disabled, a mortality study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 185-194.
Annerstedt, L. S., J. and Gustafson, L. (1996). A Dynamic Long-Term Care System for the Demented Elderly. International Psychogeriatrics, 8, 561-574.
Banerjee, S. (2012). The challenge of evaluating mental health services for older people. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26, 551-557.
Banerjee, S. and Chan, J. (2005). Organisation of old age psychiatric services. Psychiatry, 4, 4.
Bartels, S. J. M., G. S. and Dums, A. R. (2002). Models of Mental Health Services in Nursing Homes: A Review of the Literature. Psychiatric Services, 53, 1390-1396.
Beecham, J. C., P.; Hallam, A. and Knapp, M. (1993). The costs of domus care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 827-831.
Beecham, J. C., P. et al. (2004). Twelve years on: Service use and costs for people with mental illness who left psychiatric hospital. Journal of Mental Health 13, 363-377.
Bellelli, G. F. et al (1998). Special Care Units for Demented Patients: A Multicenter Study. The Gerontologist, 38, 456-462.
BGS (2004). The Specialist Health Needs of Older People Outside an Acute Hospital Setting. BGS Best Practice Guidelines. British Geriatrics Society.
Brodaty, H. et al. (2003). Randomized Controlled Trial of Different Models of Care for Nursing Home Residents With Dementia Complicated by Depression or Psychosis. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 64, 63-72.
Carr, S. J. and Marshall, M. (1993). Innovations in long stay care for people with dementia. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 3, 157-167.
Castle, N. G. (2001). Relocation of the Elderly. Medical Care Research and Review, 291-333.
Challis, D. R., Reilly, S., Hughes, J., Burns, A., Gilchrist, H. and Wilson, K. (2002). Policy, organisation and practice of specialist old age psychiatry in England. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 1018-1026.
Comas-Herrera, A., et al. (2011). Future Costs of dementia-related long-term care: exploring future scenarios. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 10.
20
Danermark, B. D., Ekstrom, M.E. and Bodin, L.L. (1996). Effects of residential relocation on mortality and morbity among elderly people. European Journal of Public Health, 6, 213-217.
Dean, R., Briggs, K. and Lindesay, J. (1993). The Domus Philosophy: A prospective evaluation of two residential units for the elderly mentally ill. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8, 807-817.
Deparment of Health (2007). The National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS Funded Nursing Care. In: Health D. O. (ed.). London: HMSO.
Department of Health (2012a). Decision Support Tool for NHS Continuing Care. In: Health D. O. (ed.). London.
Department of Health (2012b). National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare. In: Health D. O. (ed.). London: HMSO.
Draper, B. (2000). The Effectiveness of Old Age Psychiatry Services. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 687-703
Draper, B., Meares, S. and McIntosh, H. (1998). A Psychogeriatric Outreach Service to Nursing Homes in Sydney. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 17, 184-186.
Fischer, C. E. et al. (2011). Determining the Impact of a Psychogeriatric Outreach Network in Long-Term Care. Psychiatric Services, 62, 299-302.
Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London.
Green, S., Girling, D. M., Lough, S., Ng, A. M. N. and Whitcher, S. K. (1997). Service provision for elderly people with long-term functional illness. Psychiatric Bulletin, 5.Hellman, S. J. 1988. The Continuing Care Service. In: Shore M. F. G., J. E. (ed.) Serving the Chronically Mentally Ill in an Urban Setting. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holmes, D. et al. (1990). Impacts associated with special care units in long-term care facilities. Gerontologist, 30, 178-183.
Jolley, D. J., Koskey, N. and Holloway, F. (2004). Older people with long-standing mental illness: the graduates. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10, 27-34.
Jonsson, L. (2004). Economic evidence in dementia. European Journal of Health Economics, suppl 1, S30-S35.
Killian, E. (1970). Efects of geriatric transfers on mortality rates. Social Work, 19-26.
Leff, J., Trieman, N. Knapp, M. and Hallam, A. (2000). The TAPS Project: A report on 13 years of research 1985-1998. The Psychiatric Bulletin, 165-168.
21
Macdonald, A. and Cooper, B. (2007). Long-term care and dementia services: an impending crisis. Age and Ageing, 6.
Macpherson, R., Shepherd, G. and Edwards, T. (2004). Supported Accommodation for people with severe mental illness: a review. 180-188.
Mangen, S. P. (1994). 'Continuing Care': an Emerging Issue in European Mental Health Policy. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 235.
Mann, S. A. and Cree, W. (1976). 'New' long stay psychiatric patients: a national sample survey of fifteen mental hospitals in england and Wales 1972/73. Psychological Medicine, 6, 603-616.
Martin, M. D., et al. (2002). An Evaluation of Needs in Elderly Continuing-Care Settings. International Psychogeriatrics, 14, 9.
Mccrae, N. and Banerjee, S. (2011). Modernizing mental health services for older people: a case study. International Psychogeriatrics, 23, 9.
Mccrae, N. and Banerjee, S. (2010). The challenge of evaluating mental health services for older people. International Journal of Psychogeriatrics, 551-557.
Monroe-Devita, M. B., and Mohatt, D.E. (1999). The State Hospital and the Community: An Essential Continuum for Persons with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 84, 85-97.
Prince, M., and McDaid, D. (2007). Financing and funding mental health care services. In: Knapp M., McDaid, D; Mossialos, Elios; Thornicorft, Graham (Eds.) Mental Health Policy and Practice across Europe. London: OUP.
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2006a). Job Description for Old Age Psychiatry Consultants. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2006b). Raising the Standard. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Roberts, J., et al. (2000). Specialized continuing care models for persons with dementia: a systematic review of the research literature. Canadian Journal on Aging, 19, 20.
Rovner, B. W.,Steele, C. D., Shmuely, Y. and Folstein, M. F. (1996). A randomized trial of dementia care in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc, 44, 7-13.
Ryan, T. (2005). Using a Whole System Approach to Service Development in Rehabilitation and Continuing Care Services. The Mental Health Review, 10, 5.
22
Sloane, P. D., Lindeman, D.A., Phillips, C., Moritz, D.J. and Koch, G. (1995). Evaluating Alzheimer's Special Care Units: Reviewing the Evidence and Idenitfying Potential Sources of Study Bias. Gerontologist, 35, 103-111.
Thornicroft, G., Bebbington, P. and Leff, J. (2005). Outcomes for long-term patients one year after discharge from a psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services, 46, 1416-1422.
Trieman, N. and Leff, J. (1996). Difficult to place patients in a psychiatric hospital closure programme: The TAPS project 24. Psychological Medicine, 26, 765-774.
Trieman, N. and Leff, J. (2002a). Long term outcome of long stay psychiatric inpatients considered unsuitable to live in the community: TAPS Project 44. Brtish Journal of Psychatry, 181, 428-432.
Trieman, N. and Leff, J. (2002b). Long-term outcomes of long stay psychiatric inpatients considered unsuitable to live in the community: TAPS Project 44. British Journal of Psychiatry, 428-432.
Trieman, N. and Wills, W. (1997). The Psychogeriatric Population: in transition from hospital to community based services. In: Leff J. (ed.) Care in the Community: Illusion or Reality? Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Wells, Y. J. and Jorm, A.F. (1987). Evaluation of a special nursing home unit for dementia sufferers: a randomised controlled comparison with community care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 524-531.
WHO (2004). What is the effectiveness of old age mental health services? Denmark: World Health Organisation Health Evidence Network.
Wimo, A., Mattson, B., Krakau, I., Eriksson, T., Nelvig, A. and Karlsson, G. (1995). Cost-Utility Analysis of Group Living in Dementia Care. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 11, 49-65.
23
Figure 1 Flowchart illustrating survey responses
Table 1: Break down of specialist continuing care service provision
24
Total Patients being
cared for in
private care
homes or third
sector
Plans to
stop or
reduce
services
Plans to start
a specialist
continuing
care service
Planning
to expand
services
Specialist
continuing care
services provided
by organisation
33 12 13 n/a 2
Specialist
continuing care
services not
provided by
organisation
40 40 n/a 4 n/a
25