조 장 연toegye/archive/munhwa/pd/4910.pdf · · 2013-07-04조 장 연 ... 2
TRANSCRIPT
-
*1)
.
. :
.
.
. :
.
, .
, . ,
.
.
. , .
,
. ,
.
*
-
290 49
. .
, .
.
,
.
, , , , , ,
.
.
. .
.
(1501~1570) (1762~1836)
200 .
, , , ,
.
,
.
.
-
291
.
.
.
. 12
16 ,
.
,
.
,
, .
.
. ,
.
.
,1)
1) , , 26, 1998, 93-120., , 1, 1997, 591-606., , 85, 1995, 34-66.
-
292 49
.2)
, .
.
,3) .4)
, .
, , 1078, 2000, 215-227.2) , , 3, 1974, 79-144., , 23, 1995,63-81.
, , , 1997., , 11, 2001, 195-224.
3) , , , 1976, 70-76., , 1993., , , 1991, 1-210.
, , , 1994., - 16, 1995, 122-144., , , 2002, 1-262.
4) , , , 1982, 1-112.
, , , 1989, 1-177.
, , , 1990, 1-132.
, , , 1998, 1-185.
-
293
.5) 6) .
7)
8) .
.
, ,
,
.
. :
.
9) ,
5) , , , 2000, 1-174.
, , , 2004, 1-266.
, : , , 2009, 1-301.
6) , , , , 2007.7) , , 2, 1988, 105-128.8) , , 90,1996, 29-70.
9) : , . , .
-
294 49
.10) .
.
. , . .
.
.
, .11)
.12)
.
(?~1015) (?~989) ,
(979~1032) (?~1045)
.13) .
10) , , , 2001, 199.11) ,
. .
12) , , , 1991, 212-218 .13) 2 : ,
. , . , ,
.
-
295
.
,
.14) , . .
, . ,
.
,
.
,
.15) , .16)
14) : , , .15) 76 : , , , ,
, , . , . ,
, , . , . ,
. , , .
16) , .( 6.)
-
296 49
,
.17)
.
,
.
, , , ,
,18) ,
,
.
. .
.19)
.20)
,
.21) .
17) , , , 2001, 195 .18) , , , 1995. 187-200 .19) : , .20) : , .21) : , , , .
-
297
,
.
.
. .
,
.
.
,
22)
.
.
.23)
, ,
.24)
22) 67 : , .
23) , .(, 2, 468 .)
24) 38 : , ,
-
298 49
.
.
.
, ,
, .
,25)
.
.26)
.
,
.
. , ,
. , .
25)
, , 9 . , .( 6 .)
26)
. .
.( , , , , 1995, 200 .)
-
299
.
.
. .
. .27)
.
.
.
,
.
.28)
.
.29)
27) 24 : , , , ,, .
28) : , . , . , .29) 41 : , , ,
, , , , , . , , , . ,
, , , ,
, , .
-
300 49
, ,
.
.
.
.
.
.
[ ]
,
,
.30)
. ,
. ,
,
.31)
[, ] ,
30) 29 : , , , , , .
31) 25 : , . , . , , ,
, .
-
301
.
. ,
, , . , ,
.32)
.
. ,
,
. ,
. 33) . ,
.
,
. ,
.
.
.
32) , , 1, 1997, 601.33) : , , , . ! ,
. , . , (), 26 .
-
302 49
.
.
.
,
, . ,
. .
,
,
?
,
.
?34)
.
.
.
34) 11 : , , ? , ,
, . ?
-
303
.
.35)
.
.
, ,
.
.36)
,
. , , , .
, , , 64
.
.
35)
. ,
.
.
36) 2 , .
-
304 49
.
.
. , , ,
, , , ,
.37)
, ,
, ,
216, 144,
.
.
.
.
,
. ,
.
,
.
37) 2 , , , .
-
305
. :
.
.
,
.38)
. 1
,
.
.
.
,
.
38) 36 : , , , , , . , , , . .
, ? , . , , , . . ,
, , , ,
, , , . ,
. ( ,
.
, .)
-
306 49
.39)
.40)
.
, , .
,
.
[]41)
.
.42)
. .
.
.
,
. .
39) 67 : , , , , , . ,
, .
40) 67 : , , , , .
41) 5 : . , .42) , , , 1993, 103
.
-
307
. ,
.43) 1
, ,
,
, 44).
,
.45)
.
.
?
,
, [] , .
[]
,
.46)
43) , , 22, 178 .
44) 16 : , , , , , , , , .
45) 13 : , .46) 13 : , . ,
. ? ,
, , , .
, . .
-
308 49
.
.
. ,
, .
.
. 5
,
,
.
,
.
. .
, , .
.
.
.47)
47) 19 : , , , , .
-
309
. [] ,
.
,
?
,
.
.
.
[], ,
[]
[] .48)
. . ,
. .49) 48) : , , , , ,
, , . , ,
, , . , , , ,
. , , , , . , , , . , , . , ,
. , . , . .
49) 20 : , . ,, . , , ,
.
-
310 49
.50)
,
.
.
,
.51)
. .
,
. ,
.
.
. .
. .
50) 11 : . . , , .
, , , , .
, , , .
, , , .
51) .( 26 ) .
-
311
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
, . ,
.
.
, .
,
.
.
.
, .
,
-
312 49
. ,
.
.
. ,
. ,
.
, .
, , , 1990., , , 1990.(, , , ), , 1982.(), , , 1973.(), , , 1996.(29-31 ), , 1996., , , 1992. , , , , 2007. , , , , 2000., , , 1993. 172-202., , , , 2001. 195-199., 2, , , 1991. 1-680. , , , , 1991. 26-218.
-
313
, , , , 1995. 187-200., , , 1994. 319-436.
, , 3, 1974. 79-144., , 1, 1997. 591-606., , , 1976. 70-76., , 2, 1988. 105-128., , , 2000. 1-174.
, , , 1989. 1-174.
, , , 1998. 1-177. , , , 1982. 1-117.
, , , 1993, 1-262.
, , 11, 2001. 195-224., , 1078, 2000. 215-227., , 26, 1998. 93-120., , , 2002. 1-262.
, , 85, 1995. 34-66., , , 1991. 1-210.
, , 90, 1996. 29-70.
, , 22,177-210.
, : , , 2009. 1-301.
, - 16, 1995. 122-144.
, , 23, 1995.63-81.
, , , 1990. 1-132.
, , , 1997. 1-98., , , 2004. 1-266.
-
314 49
Abstract
The Change And Homogeneity Of I-hseh() Between Lee
Whang() And Chng Yag-Yong()
Cho, Jang-Yun
The main purpose of this dissertation is to analyze Homogeneity of
I-hseh() between Lee Whang() and Chng Yag-yong().
There are Two origins in I-ching(), the prime Confucian Classic.
the one is the Theory of Yangguan-Fucha(), and the other is
the Theory of Hetu-Loushu().
Chu Hsi() apprehended I-ching in base of Tushu-Yi(), and
Tushu-Yi was based of the Theory of Hetu-Loushu. The establishment
of an ethical code was his matter of interest, and the principle was
deducted by T'ai-chi() or Li(). Lee Whang() embraceed Chu
Hsi's Tuchu-Yi. But He tightened up the concept of T'ai-chi or Li, and
suggested the proposition of Li-fa(). In his opinion, the Mind()
was a principal agent of awareness that reflected by T'ien-li(), and
the aim of studying I-ching was integrity of the Mind. On the other
hand, Chng Yag-yong() Should overcame Chu Hsi's viepoint of
Tushu-Yi, so he wanted to substitute the Sang-di() with Li in order
to regain the practical Moral principal substitute. Therefore, we can
find that There are homogeneity between Li-fa and Sang-di.
Key WordLee Whang(), Chng Yag-Yong(), the Theory of Yangguan-Fucha
(), the Theory of Hetu-Loushu(), I-hseh(), Tushu-Yi(), Li-fa(), Sang-di()
2011.6.23 2011.8.2 2011.8.5