© crown copyright met office breakout 2 how can nonlinear pde work be exploited to improve the...
TRANSCRIPT
© Crown copyright Met Office
Breakout 2How can nonlinear PDE work be exploited to improve the long-term accuracy of weather forecast models?
Exeter Workshop 1st April 2009
© Crown copyright Met Office
Topics Discussed
The following topics (amongst others) were discussed:
• Where is the bottleneck?
• Dynamics
• Physics
• Data assimilation
• Hierarchy of models
© Crown copyright Met Office
Where is the bottleneck?
• Model = resolved (dry dynamics) + unresolved (physics) + data assimilation (reality)
• Which is holding us back?
© Crown copyright Met Office
Dynamics
© Crown copyright Met Office
Dynamics
• Discrete conservation properties:Conserve mass, unavailable energy, …Dissipate enstrophy as well?
• Structures as well as TKE spectra:AMR would help.
© Crown copyright Met Office
Dynamics: Use of SG etc
• Theoretical results available:eg. long-range predictability
• SG informed design of UM dynamical core
© Crown copyright Met Office
Physics
© Crown copyright Met Office
Physics: Coupling to Dynamics
• Physics often not expressed as PDEs!Turbulence modelling approach to convection.
• Grid dependence necessitates extensive retuning when changing resolution.Bad news for AMR.
• No-man’s land of intermediate resolution.Incorporate filter scale in well-defined way. No spectral gap: could have several filter scales.
• Believable and unbelievable scales.Do physics at believable scales (Lander & Hoskins).
© Crown copyright Met Office
Physics: Coupling to Dynamics (contd)
• Parametrization serves two roles:Represents subgrid physics and corrects resolved dynamics (BL winds, spurious over-turning)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Physics: Approaches to Parametrization
• Do physics on a finer grid:ECMWF found this beneficial
• Superparametrization: a CRM in each GCM grid-box
• Amalgamate parametrizations for smoother physics:eg. BL+shallow convection
• Automatic parameter estimation?Avoid pitfall of compensating errors.
© Crown copyright Met Office
Physics: Going Stochastic
• Could make deterministic forecast more robust, as well as improving statistics.But forecast error may go up as well as down.
• Mimics physical upscale transfer of energy.Not just a correction for model dissipation.
© Crown copyright Met Office
Physics: Ensembles
• Pay-off to be found between resolution and size of ensemble.Climate people well aware of this!
• What are limits of predictability?Change of resolution affects forcings (eg. orography) as well as truncation – difficult to untangle.
• An optimistic note:Smaller scales could be controlled by larger scales – better predictability.
© Crown copyright Met Office
Assimilation & Models
© Crown copyright Met Office
Data Assimilation
• Puts information into model on pre-determined spatial scale.Could physics be made to do likewise?
• Could physics parameters be determined by data assimilation?Time-dependent physics parameters.Lack of smoothness is a problem!
• All models are wrong:Could use nudging to enforce balance.Use already made of PV inversion: pseudo-obs.
© Crown copyright Met Office
Use of Models
• Hierarchy of models may be used to improve understanding of phenomena (eg. MJO)Beware that phenomena may be complex – not captured by simple ODE models.
• Could better use of observations be made to improve models?Parametrizations are developed with close attention to obs data.
• Are we resolving the important scales?Might just have to wait for bigger computers…
© Crown copyright Met Office
Questions and Comments