! caffeoyl-coa 3- -methyl- transferase #$%&’()*#$+, -./012for.nchu.edu.tw/up_book/9886.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '323'
!" Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyl- transferase #$%&'()*#$+,
-./012
!"#1! $%&2! '()3
!"#$%&'( 97 ) 2 * 25 $+,-$%&'( 97 ) 7 * 27 $.
!"#$*+,-./0123456789:,;</=>/?@ABCDE,
(O-methyltransferase?OMT)FG<>HIJ!KLMNOPQRSTUVWX8Y
Z[\!?]^_ 526 `aBb; Caffeoyl CoA 3-O-methyltransferase(CCoAOMT)c
dBefg?hij 5’ k 3’ RACE(Rapid Amplify of cDNA End)l Genome walking?mnopq 1721 `aBb?r4stulBevw?xy- CfCCoAOMTUG!?z{
+C|}q 750 `aBb?~�<�q 249 `�B�;z{+U�����>����
��?CCoAOMT ���!*+�R��5��U�� CfCCoAOMT BeC�����
�5��GP�z{?���H� ¡¢�£¤¥¦�>IJUj8*V./§¨V.
/�q©ªN«R*+,<>H¬?FCBeR[®O!��*+,<HR¯58°
±² CfCCoAOMT RC^ !�³´�µ¶?@I±²RC^ !q·¸¹�Rº»¼
½@³¾°±²¿I±²RÀ¨C^ ?F*+,Á¢ G / S RÂÃÄÅqÆÇÈÉR
º»U
!%&'$YZÊG / S ÂËÊ*+,ÊABCDE,ÊCBeÀ¨
MOLECULAR CLONING OF CAFFEOYL-COA 3-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE GENE FROM
CHAMAECYPARIS FORMOSENSIS AND ITS EFFECTS ON LIGNIN CONTENT IN TRANSGENIC TOBACCO PLANTS
Yan-Liang Lin1 Sheng-Yang Wang2 Fang-Hua Chu3
!Received: February 25, 2008; Accepted: July 27, 2008.
1 !"#$%&'()*+,-&./01
Master, School of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University. 2 !"23%&'(&.4561
Associate Professor, School of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University. 3 !"#$%&'()*+,-&.78569:;<=1
Assistant Professor, School of Forestry and Resource Conservation, National Taiwan University, Corresponding Author, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, 106 Taipei, Taiwan.
'324' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
ÌAbstractÍLignin is the second abundant biopolymer and less then cellulose present in the plant cell wall. O-Methyltransferase (OMT) plays as a key enzyme for stepwise biosynthesis of lignin. In this study, 526 base pair DNA fragment of OMT were obtained from Chamae-cyparis formosensis. Then the 5’ and 3’ RACE (Rapid Amplify of cDNA End) coupled with the Genome walking were used to clone the full length of CCoAOMT, named CfCCoAOMT. After combining the sequence data, there is a total of 1721 bps in full length including pro-moter sequence. The coding region of this DNA fragment was 750 bps, which encodes a pro-tein of 249 amino acids. Moreover, the developing xylem from C. formosensis has the most abundance expression pattern by Northern blotting analysis. The CfCCoAOMT was con-structed into the E. coli to produce a CfCCoAOMT recombinant protein and then the poly-clonal antibody was prepared. Finally, the CfCCoAOMT’s coding region of C. formosensis was transformed into tobacco, a type of herbaceous plant, by using Agrobacterium-mediated transgenic method. Due to the biosynthesis pathways of lignin in woody plant and herbaceous plant are quite different, there is no significant difference in the total lignin content in sense transgenic tobacco, but in antisense transgenic line had slightly increased. On the other hand, the G/S ratio increased dramatically in both transgenic lines.
ÌKey wordsÍ Chamaecyparis formosensis, G/S ratio, Lignin, O-methyltransferase, Trans-genic tobacco
I!"#
!"# Lignin $%&'()*+
lignum,-!.+/0123456789
:;+<=>?@ABC,DEFGH#
$Cellulose1I!"#JK!.LM+ 20%
N30%,OP!"#QRST*UVW+
XY2Z?M[+I!"#\]F^C+
9E_`C,ab7+_`cdefg+
ehij,k2Q^C+lmnopq?
+rsno*,!"#+tuvFwx+
EyRz{|}O~�+�b,�bv�
�����������+��$Baucher
et al., 1998�Dixon, 2001�Hu et al., 1999�
Vance et al., 19801I��,vF!"#+
�������������A��",
� ¡-���wx¢y+R£_`a
?@RC�¢y�¤�¥¦$Raven et al.,
19991I
!"#§[¨©ª!"«¬�
$Monolignol1®B�¯,°v±²³«
$p-Coumaryl alcohol1c´µ«$Conifery
alcohol1c¶@«$Sinapyl alcohol1,·
¸®B�¹¯©º»¼�½¾¿?@AB
C,�©ªABC�ÀÁ+ÂÃQFÄÅ
5UÆ|�ÇȤ$Methoxyl group1É7
aÊËÌÍI��,!"#ÎOÏÐ}Ñ
+n¯�ÒÓÔ-Õp-Hydroxyphenyl lignin
$H lignin1cGuaiacyl lignin$G lignin1c
Syringyl lignin$S lignin1,Ö×Cªcn
ocwxØScwxÙn¯aRÚÅÛ+
}Ñ,5Ü©ªABC+Ýv67�}Þ
ÝÑ,k2OÏßà�+\áâÕã@^
CÏ G lignin -§[ä¯,�å@^C-
G + S lignin,æç^Cè H + G + S lignin
$Borejan et al., 2003�Sederoff et al.,
19991Ié 20 ê%,Q·¸ëè��ìí
+îïð,vF!"#RB¯ñò,óÃ
2Q!"#�+RB¯ôõ5,öO÷
ø�Áù+úû$Chen et al., 2006; Li et al.,
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '325'
2003; Zhang and Chiang, 1997; Chiang,
2002, 20061I�*,ÇȤ¡üý#
$O-methyltransferase,OMT1VWþÝÿ
M[+XY$Ho et al., 20021I¨ OMT ¤
�UR¯+ý#,§[+�b-vĤA
BC!"Ǥ$methyl group1+¡ü,�
Q!"#RB¯#ò*,§[$Q×%ª
+OMT,°Caffeic acid O-methyltransferase
$Ïð&'- COMT1,a Caffeoyl-CoA
3-O-methyltransferase $ Ï ð & ' -
CCoAOMT1,�´v}Ñ+(Av)*|
}Ñ+ó+ý#,, CCoAOMT O-
caffeoyl CoA(AR¯ feruloyl CoA ~2-
5-hydroxyferuloyl CoA (AR¯ sinapoyl
CoA$Burlat et al., 2001; Humphreys and
Chapple, 20021I
./$Chamaecyparis formosensis12
8�0åÏ1234�'()-ÓÔ�^
C,56å7!�¿89:;©<-=>
8�Á´µ7$!!",19951I#$%
&-',()*+��,-ö´v().
/�Ýj§.,/à0?1cR23c3
*42cno56c!.�"a7�8,
9:þÝÿ:;+¯<I=�,|>�?
7�?@@A+BC%��./�ªDc
deEFG?@HDjI8J.$KLM
8,2000; Hwang et al., 20011,kN./
!.¹¯G!"#�R¯OP8J.,Q
RST|��UGI-VW./!"#R
B¯+XY,ç��Z[!"./
CCoAOMT ¤��\],5?^�_`c
ab"cda¡¤���,ÏVW
CCoAOMT Q./UVW�XYaQef
^Cghæ*+cd¾iI
II!$%&'(
( I ) jk.l
çjkUm�+.l-12êno�.
/,m&pqr)Á�sk*tuv*
w,-]x+.lÀ�qö·yz{|+
c}~�,�й¯¢-����]�2
*�}q,��~]�2*!"q,�¯
��,5Ö°Ï�S���,À��$F
!80�����I
( II ) 7}�7 RNA �]aX¡�XY
-�$F!80��.l]â,5Q�S
�*�¯w�¾�,Ð� Chang et al.
$19931+ô��]7}*+ total RNAI
7� SuperScript™ II Reverse Transcriptase
$ Invitrogen1X¡�ý#B¯��+
cDNA,�7� Ex Taq$TaKaRa1!"
Polymerase chain reaction$PCR1XY,B
¯��� dsDNA,�-��sk�.lI
(III) CCoAOMT ¤��z_`�\]
1. ���_`�\]
¨ National Center for Biotechnology
Information$NCBI1¤��l *�¡è
ªö�c�æçp!ç^C+ CCoAOMT
_`,5Т|>£¤�+_`¥¦�v
§@,?ÃÓÔ-Õ
CCOMT-FÕ5’-CA(G/A)AG(T/C)GATGC
(T/C)CT(C/T)TA(T/C)CA(G/A)-3’
CCOMT-RÕ5’-GG(A/C/T)GC(C/A)ACCAC
(A/G)GA(T/G)CC(A/G)TTCCA-3’
7��v§@¨B©ª«¬,�[&X
YUB¯+ dsDNA ®-.l,!" PCR,
'326' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
XY¯°- 94� 1 min,$94� 30 s,X
� 30 s,72� 1 min,X Ö×sk}Ñ!
"¥±1!" 35 0²Å�,72�XY 7
min,À�£mQ 4�˳ PCR ´_IPCR
XYµC·¸ 1.2% +¶·¸¹º,!"»
¼ � ? ½ , 5 ¾ ä $ pGEM-T Easy
$Promega1¿5,¡� High Efficiency
DH5" Competent cell$GeneMark1*,7
�6| AmpicillincIPTG G X-Gal + LB
ÀS56¤%!"ÁÂ,5�]+"Ã
Ä ABI 377 &Å+_Æ$Perkin Elmer1Ð
�T7~2SP6 primer-Ç�È!"¤�+
_,�_`�lI
2. CCoAOMT¤�� 5’ Êa 3’ Ê_`�\
]
7�[&skUÉ�£¤�_`,¥
¦´v_` 5’ Êa 3’ Ê%0ô�!"
Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends$RACE1
a Genome Walking UË�§@,5Ð�
BD SMART™ RACE cDNA Amplification
Kit a BD GenomeWalker™ Universal Kit
�¼Ì,·¸ PCR XY«¬âó+�_`
ÍÎ,5ÂÏ� pGEM-T easy "*,+
_��_`�lI
(IV) ÐôÑB?^
- 15 µg �¤�©ª?Ã7�
HindIIIcEcoRIcDraI !"ÒPý#ÓÔ,
7�¶·¸!"¹º,57�Õw¡Ö
�-©ª¡ÖÀ+$×ØÙ5,7�[&
skUÉ��¤��z,Ð� DIG labeling
kit$Roche1B¯�ÎV´,ÃÄ��ÑB
XY�¢|���XY�V´Oå
Anti-DIG-AP Ú$Roche1UÛÜ,!�
a CDP-Star, ready-to-use$Roche1µRX
Y5ÝÞFßÍ$Kodak BioMax MR film1
5I
(V) àôÑB?^
- 15 µg �}ÑqÌ total RNA !"E
�¶·¸¹º,Ö�7�Õw¡Ö�-
RNA ¡ÖÀ+$×ØÙ5,7�[&sk
UÉ��¤��z,Ð� DIG labeling kit
$Roche1Qab"¡áw*B¯�ÎV
´,ÃÄ��ÑBXY�¢|���XY
�V´Oå Anti-DIG-AP Ú$Roche1U
Û Ü , ! � a CDP-Star, ready-to-use
$Roche1µRXY5ÝÞFßÍ$Kodak
BioMax MR film15I
(VI) Mnab"cdc�AcènÚ�
â�aãäÑBXY
� pET-20b(+)$Novagene1�-a
b"cd�¿,5Ð�./ CCoAOMT
¤�_`�l,-O¡�â太�_`
¾ä$ pET-20b(+) *,�¡�ab"cd
æ§ E. coli BL21$DE31*,5Ð�çè
�¾é!" IPTG êëR¯MnabI
·¸êë��,7�ìíîïÍ
$TOMY1ð�,ñ��òÝóôõ¾�,
7�ö�½÷OÏ 8,000 x g -Oø�ab
a}Oø�ab$Inclusion body1?�,
Ö°-Oø�abùÏ His-select Nickel
Affinity Resin$SIGMA1,5ú�çè�
¾é!"�A¢| His-tag +Mnab,-
3 mg��ACCoAOMT øF 1X PBS buffer
ûüýþtRCÿ!"#!"$@�èn
Úâ�I
%& Laemmli$19701+ô�,�
Bio-Rad Mini-PROTAN ïÍ,â� 0.75
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '327'
mm,12%� Discontinuous polyacrylamide
gel Ï!" SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Elec-
trophoresis,˳�7��'f¹¡Ö(,
-ab¡Ö$ PVDF Ù5,7� Anti-
CCoAOMT ®-�EÚ,AP-conjugated
Anti-rabbit antibody �-9EÚ,!"ã
ä Ñ B ? ^ , À � 7 � BCIP/NBT
$SIGMA1ø�óYI
(VII) hæ¤�¡Ï
Ð./� CCoAOMT ¤�O¡�âå
¤ª_`$ORF1�u)¥¦%v§@,
?ÃÃÄ*+�$ sense1ÏGX+�
$antisense1¡Ï¿�¾äI-*+�a
X+�� PCR µC¾ä$ pHANNINBAL
$Wesley et al., 20011"5,7� NotI
ÒPý#O-Æ| 35S promoter �*+�
aX+�ÍÎ�ð,�ð�ÍÎ�,B$
pART27$Gleave, 199215,-¯�,B
�"¡Ø�-.�LBA4404*ÏÄ��
/0hæ!"¤�¡ÏI
hæ¡Ï1�+.l2 Nicotiana ta-
bacum cv. W38 5� Horsch 8,$19851
�c�skô�,Ó]J 1 cm Pô�hæ
µÍ,7�ø23QµÍ5â3>ë4
5,Ö�Ï-.��/0hæµÍ,-µ
Í6ÍQ6|ÚR#� TSM 56¤$MS
with vitamin + 0.1 mg/L NAA + 1 mg/L BA
+ 3% sucrose + 1% phyto-agar,pH5.71*,
¯�¡¤�?OÏ�ÚÚR#�ÁÂ,5
&78459zâ:,ñ:O?½�
;,ü$<+ÚR#56¤*M=ÁÂ,
À�ü$ TRM 56¤$TSM }6 BA1*,
O*>Rz5�%M<R¯�0<+^n
°-¡Ïn,*>�%�^nOü^$�
!56!*,Q"#*m�RzÏÃÄ�
�sk1�I
(VIII) !"#+$+
-RzF"#�%0%no�hæ^
n]¯&µÍ�]¤�©ª,Ö�'�
µÍ(ð)+q*,+35q 10 cm ��
�]J 10 cm �hæ+)q!"!"#�
$+,»¼�,)qno�Ï>-�,O
.¯,Í,Ö�-no,Í/�Ç«,Í
Fìíî01 10 min,M= 3 E,2�5
¢�¯iY¾,�-.,�no�E6
ÍF 105�3��þ,-.,�no7�4
1��O�¯w�¾,Ï Klason �$K5
©8,20011+7!"#67,57�
Pyrolysis GC-MS �$Camarero et al., 19991
?^ G/S �67I
Pyrolysis GC-MS ?^¯°,ð,]L
M 0.2 mg �w�6� Pyrolysis GC-MS
(Agilent)*,$+¯°¥+-ÕPyrolysis
89ø1� PY-2020 D,"º- 550�,
GC - 6890N,":Æ- 5973N MSD 5Ï
70 eV $+,?½;I1� DB5$30 m × 250
µm × 0.30 µm1I"º¯°+¥+-ÕÇ�
"º 50�£m 2 min,Ï 4�/min 5<�
275�I=>?"º 270�,@1�A@,
?B6 20Õ1,B-Õ20 mL/minIFAB
CC+ôõ*1� Wiley$V 7.01cNist mass
spectrometer library$V 2.01G@DE
$SIGMA1I
III!)*
( I ) ./ CCoAOMT ¤�_`�ÂÏ
ç)¯�3±BÂÏUÉ��U|_
'328' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
`ÍÎ,FÉ./ CCoAOMT mRNA ��
z_`,G¦ 1103 0H¤v$I 11
$GenBank accession number: DQ3059761,
�*/6 5’ Êp 3’ ÊJ¡á_`K 79 a
274 0H¤v,O¡áab_`G¦ 750
0H¤v,5O¡áâ¢| 249 0太
�ab",·¨ab"�l $ExPasyc
Motif Scan1�L$,太_`*8 78
$ 193 0太- SAM-binding motif,�
ab"�bw�+§[%+Qa SAM
$S-adenosyl-L-methionine1®ËB,5Ã
ÄǤ¡üý#!"(A;UË+ Methyl
group �%D$Ferrer et al., 20051I±B
Genome Walking �Ë<,OÉ�¤��M
Å@_`G 588 0H¤v,�q?�_`
·¨�l $Plant cis-acting regulatory
DNA elements16v?^,�d promoter
Ob¢|��bN�,c 1,/à8OPc
GA ¥¦cM9]XYcQXYcþRÛc
�����cS4aT�OP88Ýj�
Ob�w�I
( II ) CfCCoAOMT ¤�Q./*+UVÉ
-«/ÐôÑB?^����,V´
�â�Â� C Êab"¡áwa�Î 3’
ÊJ¡áw$3’UTR1,!"V´â�,
ÑBË<ÝWÕÐ� HindIIIcEcoRI a DraI
�skË<UâdƾÉ%OÏ_c
CCoAOMT ¤�Q¤�©ª*U¢|�
UVÉ$copy number1,¨I 2 �Ë<,
OÏXY�·¨©ªÒPý#U9£¸�
+©ª,·¸V´�ÑBXYâd�¯Æ
Z- 2 ¯,ÝW CfCCoAOMT ¤�Q./
+¤�©ª*Ob¢| 2 0UVÉI
! 1 CCoAOMT"#$%&'()*+,
-!./0+1234 SAM-binding motif
Fig. 1 DNA sequence of CCoAOMT and the coding sequence of CCoAOMT. Un-derline indicates SAM-binding motif
(III) CfCCoAOMT ¤�Q./}Ñno�
cd
7�àôÑB?^,´v 12 êR�.
/+�2*!"qc�2*�}qcµ@c
[\c 1 êRµ@c 1 êR%q!"
CfCCoAOMT ¤�cd7ÂF�XY,Ë<
,I 3,�*�2*!"q+cd7>,[\E�,�2*�}qÀ]�µ@
a%q*^_`|cdI
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '329'
5 1 CCoAOMT " promoter 6 PLACE 72389":;+< Table 1 Functions of CCoAOMT gene’s promoter region predicted by PLACE analysis
Box Position (bp) Description
CCAAT -264 Heat shock element CAREOSREP -78 Gibberellin regulate CURECORECR -520 Copper response element GAREAT -116 Gibberrllin response element GT1CONSENSUS -184,-212,-235,-299,-341,
-368,-378,-471 Light-regulated
GT1GMSCAM4 -184,-235,-341,-471 Pathogen and salt induced MYBPZM -260 MYB-related element MYCCONSENSUSAT -44,-159,-412 Water stress WBBOXPCWRKY1 -516 Early defense WBOXHVISO1 -436,-477,-541,-581 Defense system WBOXNTERF3 -436,-477,-541,-581 Wounding response
MÎDIG-labeled marker (bp)ÊH?E?D �Ï-
HindIII?EcoRI?DraI ÐE,ÑÒÓ;YZB
e¢Ô�U
! 2 =>?@ABCDEF CCoAOMTGHI#$JKL"MGNO
Fig. 2 Southern analysis of CCoAOMT in C. formosensis’s genomic DNA
(IV) ¡Ï CfCCoAOMT ¤�Qhæ*+c
d
1. ¡¤�hæsk
¡¤�hæÐ�sk¥¦,GÂÏâ
1 2 3 4 5 6
Õ� 15 ug ;¯5 RNA £¤Ö�×®?Lane 1-ØÙ8ÚÛÜ<;��!*+�?Lane 2 -ÚÛÜ<;��!ÝÞ�?Lane 3 -ÚÛÜ<;ßc?Lane 4 -ÚÛÜ<;àá?Lane 5 -âÜ<YZ;ßc?Lane 6 -âÜ<;YZRã��äU
! 3 =>P@BCDEFHIQRST
" CCoAOMT 5UVW Fig. 3 Northern analysis of different tissues
in C. formosensis
*+�_`¡Ïn 10 0Ea$line1cX
+�_`¡Ïn 8 0Eacp�b¡�»
"�v�n$pART271acR�^
n,ª^F"#*ÏÄsk1�I
2. ¡Ïhæ* CfCCoAOMT ¤��cd
7�àôÑB�?^XY¡�hæ^
n CCoAOMT ¤��cd´º,Ë<WF
I 4,�**+�+¡Ïn*,� s5 ¡Ï
ncd+ RNA |>ë+9ødi�,�e
bp
23130941665574361
23222027
564
M H E D CCoAOMT EtBr staining
'330' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
+¡ÏnZ·¨ 35S MÅ@+fÅ���
Á7cd�¾i$I 4a1�QX+�+¡
Ïn*,� an1can2can9 +cdg-h
|,�e+ 5 0¡Ïni|gè+cd$I
4b1IãäÑB?^�Ë<,I 5,Qab
"+cd´º5,*+�¡ÏnaàôÑ
B?^iOj$�cd,�X+�¡Ïn
5T$É CfCCoAOMT cd�ab"I
3. ¡Ïhæ*!"#RB¯
¡Ïhæ�!"#RB¯¾i,�*
+�¡Ïn*Â] 5 0Ea,�X+�¡
Ïn*Â] 4 0EaI7� Klason’s lignin
method %$+�7!"#,Ë<,c 2,
cRØ$WT1a»"v�n$VC1+
!"#67J-LM� 8.5%,Q*+�¡
Ïn*�þ s1 Ea+!"#67ÁÁ+h
F�eEa�,�eEa+!"#67i
- 8~9%kl,acR�!"#675i
Ý×+ÂF�QX+�+¡Ïn*,� an2
gh,�e©0Eai- 10%kl,pc
RØ+ 8.5%Ý6,!"#67Ã<JK�
ç�M�m?��I7� Pyrolysis GC-MS
%$+ G lignin a S lignin +6767,Ë
<±£,c 3,U`â�èª!"#�Ò+
n?Ã_c G lignin a S lignin +67,-
I¹�l/Ï:?5¦oâÝvõ:�O
ÏÉ� G/S +6nIcRØa»"v�
n+6nJ- 1.1,*+�+¡Ïn*�þ
s2 ¡Ïn+ G/S 6ng�e¡Ïn-h
�,s1cs3 a s4 +6ni>F 1.3,s6 +
6np>� 1.5,an1can2 a an5 +6nZ
>F 1.3I
IV!+,
ç���¤��l Â]öqCª+
CCoAOMT ¤��l,/Ï6v?^,Â
WTÎå<æÊVCÎç+¢bè�Ês1-s10ΰ±²C^ Êan1-an9ÎI±²C^
! 4X =>P@BCDYZ)[\]" CCoAOMT ^5U Fig. 4r Northern analysis of CCoAOMT gene expression pattern in transgenic tobacco plants
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '331'
OMTÎj�������iÓéê;z{ÊMÎprotein marker (kDa)ÊWTÎå<æÊ VCÎç+¢bè�Ês1-s10ΰ±²C^ Êan1-an9ÎI±²C^
! 5X )#$\]" CCoAOMT &'(_`BCEF Fig. 5r Western analysis of CCoAOMT in transgenic tobacco plants
5 2 =>Klason’s lignin method7ab"
c)[d^e(fgh Table 2 Klason lignin content of transgenic
tobacco plants
Transgenic line Klason lignin content
WT 8.56% ± 1.98 VC 9.02% ± 0.37 s1 6.25% ± 0.28 s2 9.45% ± 3.2 s3 8.43% ± 2.6 s4 9.06% ± 0.45 s6 9.34% ± 0.32
an1 10.81% ± 0.05 an2 9.49% ± 0.29 an4 10.43% ± 3.55 an5 10.58% ± 1.12
WTÎå<æÊVCÎç+¢bè�Ê s1ës6ΰ±²;C^ Ê an1ëan5ÎI±²;C^ U
]�ÎQ DNA _`a太_`i
¢|>£¤�+w�,¥¦â�n&s�
§@v$Degenerate primer1,�v§@¯
�3Q./\]â CCoAOMT +£¤�_
`I¨ Genome Walking UÉ�� Promoter
+_`·¨�l $Plant cis-acting regu-
latory DNA elements1�?^Ë<t$,
CCoAOMT¤�¥¦ObaGA|j$Sutoh
and Yamauchi, 20031�=�,Qu¬RÛ
~2��C£4vZ|Obw¥¦
CCoAOMT ¤��cdITamagnone 8,
$19981ê´v MYB Transcription factor
!"¡Ïhæ+sk,�d� Transcription
factor OÞx±Ä¤yzRB¯#ò
$Phenylpropanoid pathway1,53¯!"
'332' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '333'
#RB¯�ÂFa3¯^CRz5�{E
a!"#RB¯#òggÝjI=�,
Kawaoka 8,$20001��d�0a¥¦
ĤyzRB¯#òÝj+ LIM-related
transcription factor,�Q¡¤�hæ+��
*�{Eþ!"#+R¯¾iI�
CCoAOMT �/6FĤyzRB¯#ò
§[R¯!"#��,�p�e+9E_
`C�R¯|ÓÝj�Yang 8,$20041
��d CCoAOMT /6F^C�#
$Phytoalexin1+RB¯#ò*,�eS|
Gibberellin response element c Wounding
responsecLight-regulated a Pathogen and
salt induced 8t$�+ promoter w�$
Q,Qu¬RÛa��C£4vði|O
bw¥¦!"#�RB¯IQQ}ò^C
�±9E_`C+RB¯~¹¯�0=
Ñ�½�$Metabolic grid1�ggÝj
$Dixon, 20011I
· ¨ Ð ô Ñ B ? ^ O Ï ÷ ø
CCoAOMT ¤�Q./0Y+$Q¾
i,¨©ªÒPý#U9£¸��¤�
©ª,·¸ DIG-labeled probe !"ÑBX
Y,Ë<t$./0Y*+ CCoAOMT
-%0UVÉ,Q Loblolly pine$Pinus taeda1
+0Y*-�0UV$Li et al., 19991,
kQÑ]+ Scot pine$Pinus sylvestris1*
{>�Z90UVÉ,5t$ CCoAOMT
| Gene family +$Q$Chiron et al.,
20001IÑxQ0Y*âdm0UVÉ
�t$¢| Gene family +�/à��æ
$Ye et al., 19941I=�,¤�+UVÉ
è�5}b�v_c¤�+cd7,��
��Rz�2�dia}Ñno���
�I
7�àôÑB?^�6g./}Ñq
ÌG}Ñ7o� CCoAOMT +cd´º,
Ë<�d CCoAOMT Ï�2*!"qcd
À>,�2¨F�2*+!"qË<Rë
èERwxÙ,���qÌ� CCoAOMT
|g>+cd7,[\cd7E�,Ñx
+Ë<�Q Loblolly pine +��*�d$Li
et al., 19991I$FF./´µ+cd*2
Ï 12 êRÁF 1 ê,cd7À]+*2�
2*+�}qIInoue +���â$Inoue et
al., 19981,Zinnia +�}q�| CCoAOMT
+cd,�%qcd7ÝgF)qód�
]+di,Î~ë2�-%qnoU6+
�ACgè,�] RNA }�,��3¯
RNA +9ø,ëùÑB��EÂI
¸'ÉZê,Ï-.�$Agrobacterium
sp.1-��U!"+¤�¡Ïsk,�Ï
VW¤�ó�����~2{��C�7
�ôf,ö¯-?Rsk#+¤çÿ!I
Q!"#+RB¯#ò5,æç^C$h
æ1U��µR+- H+G+S lignin,�p
ã@^CU��µR+- G lignin }Ñ
$Atanassova et al., 1995�Borejan et al.,
2003�Sederoff et al., 19991,�-.
/� CCoAOMT ¡�hæ^C*,57�
CaMV 35S promoter fÅð�¤�/ÏÁ
7cd CCoAOMT,£U5,Á7ý#+
(Að CCoAOMT �ð�µC��w«
/,!�Q G / S 6n5w6�[+cRØ
hæ%É>,�,L�+Ë<,*+�¡
Ïn� G / S 6nZgcRØ%É>I=
�,CCoAOMT Q!"#RB¯U(A+
28��ÎǤ¡ü,�|Ob�-ð�
'334' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
µC~2(Aý#+���!"89E+
Ǥ¡ü,,��%B¯ñò��R¯q
?+ S lignin$Humphreys and Chapple,
20021,��Q s2 +¡Ïn* =ab"
¢|g>+cd7,k2 G / S 6n{pc
RØ�!I=�,¤�¡Ïsk*7�¡
�a%@¤�X��_`,�°7�µR
X+�� mRNA �Ï9h~�P�ç¤�
�cd7+BC*,ç��¡�./�X
+�+ CCfCoAOMT,£U5¡b¯��P
�çN$QFhæ�� CCoAOMT +cd
*YÿwFÉ G / S 6n9h+Ë<,=�
Qçjk+X+�¡Ïn* G / S 6ni6
cRØ%É>,t$Ob¨F./ahæ
$GenBank accession numberÕU627351�
CCoAOMT ¤�+Ý¢º�| 76%,5i
�£7���P+�<�=��ôõ�|
Ob2�-¡�+X+�¤s���P+
��,k2!"#�RB¯#ò2¥¦�
=Ñ+,�Pþ CCoAOMT �Ú�,k2
{¼,¥¦þ�eý#�Ú�1É G lig-
nin +B¯ñò¨�ç+ñò{E- COMT
§4CL§CCR§CAD,�µR G lignin
$Humphreys and Chapple, 20021I7�¡
� antisense +BCÏ9h CCoAOMT �Ú
�,Qhæ*w3¯ G a S lignin +9h,
k2 G / S 6n{iòÝ+EÅ,Ñ;�-
¡¤�Þx±�Rz¾i$Pincon et al.,
20011,Ñx+sk¥¦Q¨©+¡¤�
sk**w1É G lignin Á¬9h$Guo et
al., 20011IQ./+ CCoAOMT ¡¤�h
æsk*,!"#+�7EA5`|Ý×
+{E�Qæç~!ç^C*,�P COMT
ý#Ú�Ï9h!"#RB¯��7,v
�� S lignin �R¯¢|Á7�P+Ë
<,k2vF±�!"#67{`|ò
Ý+{E$ Atanassova et al., 1995 �
Doorsselaere et al., 19951,¡2[9h±
^C+!"#�7,�!"#RB¯#
· Phenylpropanoid pathway +8�0ý#
PAL a C4H �-¥¦+@+C,OÏ�]
g>+¯�$Sewalt et al., 19971I
V!),
ç��¯�ÂÏ�./� CCoAOMT
�z¤�,�*ab"¡áwG 750 0H
¤v,O¯�¡áâ¢| 249 0太�
ab"I7�Áª.�cdMnab,5
��Mnab¯�â�âènÚI!�
¼?^Ë<Éq CCoAOMT Q./^n*
cd¾iÏ�2*�!"qÀ-«¬I7
�-.�¡Ï+BC,ç��¯�3-
CCoAOMT ¤�¡Ï�hæ*,5Q*+
�9£aX+�¡Ïn*É� G/S lignin
6n<>�Ë<I!"#-^CwxÙ*
�§[¯?��,÷ø!"#+RB¯#
ò,O«/v!"#R¯+Ü,pO·
¨÷øR¯#ò%v!"#+RB¯/Ï
®¯5¦PI =!"#+R¯#òö°
±å²õ,kvF!"#+R¯#ò,�
¨F}Ñ+ý#cABCp?^ÿ!}³
åÃâc{��m�+å®*,OPvF
±+B¯#ò�|´è}¤++q?I
��,}µ+��>7�¡¤�+ôf/
Ï{E~¥¦!"#�R¯I����â
!"#�RB¯w¶�RzÅÛcwxØ
S·$2}Ñ+wxÙn¯�|}Ñ+n
¯a67,�¸2,¹v!"#RB¯º
»¼Á�=Ñ+RB¯a½!"¥¦,{
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '335'
2¾µ÷ø+,÷ø,¹¥¦!"#�R
B¯�2T%�¿nÉVW+�0ÀÁI
ç��ZE&ÂÃ7ª*,ÂÏâF!"
# R B ¯ ¸ ´ * Ä - M [ + ý #
Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase,ÂÃ
7ªè-M[�ÅÆ�·Ç7ª,ÝÈç
��UÉ�¯<,vT%��çÃ*!�
!.¹¯G!"#RB¯,|M[�ú�
ÉnI
VI!-.
ç)ÊË"ÌÍpÎÃ�û-wÃÄ
��·Ï$NSC 94-2313-B-005-0711,r
)Á�sk*;£9ÃÄsk.lÏG*
+jkU¹0Ð[Rp*ÑÁ�Ò*�a
ÓÔÕ§Ö×Ø Pyrolysis-GC/MS ? �̂Q
�ù5Z9Ù?+`/I
VII!/012
!!"$19951()ÆM´µm!I*Ú
*�wÛÜ 956 ÝI510 pp. KLMcKÞßc*à@$20001./a
r)áÂ+µâ DNA deEFGã
ä?AI r)*+Ã� 15Õ229-23I K5©cåææcç<ècé5ê$20011
7!RzYï���(II)Õëì.A�¯
?aRzYï�jII*Ú*�íî 34(1)Õ101-109I
Atanassova, R., N. Favet, F. Martz, B. Chabbert, M-T Tollier, B. Monties, B.
Fritig, and M. Legrand (1995) Altered lignin composition in transgenic tobacco expressing O-methyltransferase sequences
in sense and antisense orientation. The Plant Journal 8: 465-477.
Baucher, M., B. Monties, M. V. Montagu, and W. Boerjan (1998) Biosynthesis
and genetic engineering of lignin. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 17: 125-197.
Boerjan, W., J. Ralph, and M. Baucher (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annual Re-view of Plant Biology 54: 519-546.
Burlat, V., M. Kwon, L. B. Davin, and N. G.
Lewis (2001) Dirigent proteins and dirigent sites in lignifying tissues. Phyto-chemistry 57: 883-897.
Camarero, S., P. Bocchini, G. C. Galletti, and A. T. Martı´nez1 (1999) Pyrolysis-gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry analy-sis of phenolic and etherified units in natural and industrial lignins. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 13: 630-636.
Chang, S., J. Puryear, and J. Cairney (1993) A simple and efficient method for isola-tion RNA from pine trees. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 11: 113-116.
Chiang, V. L. (2002) From rags to riches.
Nature Biotechnology 20: 557-558. Chiang, V. L. (2006) Monolignol biosyn-
thesis and genetic engineering of lignin in trees, a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters 4:143-146.
Chiron, H., A. Drouet, A-C. Claudot, C.
Eckerskorn, M. Trost, W. Heller, D. Ernst, and H. Sandermann Jr (2000) Molecu-lar cloning and functional expression of a stress-induced multifunctional O-methyltransferase with pinosylvin me-
'336' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
thyltransferase activity from Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Molecular Bi-ology 44: 733-745.
Chen Z. Z., Y. C. Chen, Y. H. Chou, and Y.
Lin (2006) cDNA cloning and mo-lecular characterization of 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase in Eucalyptus
camaldulensis. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 21: 87-100.
Dixon, R. A. (2001) Natural products and
plant disease resistance. Nature 411: 843-847.
Doorsselaere, J. V., M. Baucher, E. Chognot, B. Chabbert, M-T Tollier, M. Petit-Conil, J. C. Leple, G. Pilate, D. Cornu, and B.
Monties (1995) A novel lignin in pop-lar tree with a reduced caffeic acid/ferulic acid O-methyltransferase activity. The Plant Journal 8: 855-864.
Ferrer, J. L., C. Zubieta, R. A. Dixon and J. P.
Noel (2005) Crystal structures of Al-falfa caffeoyl coenzyme A 3-O-methyl-transferase. Plant Physiology 137: 1009-1017.
Gleave, A. P (1992) A versatile binary
vector system with a T-DNA organiza-tional structure conductive to efficient in-tegration of cloned DNA into plant ge-nome. Plant Molecular Biology 20: 1203-1207.
Guo, D., F. Chen, K. Inoue, J. W. Blount,
and R. A. Dixon (2001) Downregula-tion of caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase and caffeoyl CoA 3-O-methyltransferase in transgenic alfalfa: impacts on lignin structure and implications for the biosyn-
thesis of Gand S lignin. The Plant Cell 13: 73-88.
Ho, C. K., Y. C. Chen, and Z. Z. Chen (2002) cDNA Cloning and sequence
analysis of 5-hydroxyconiferaldehyde O-methyltransferase from Eucalyptus
camaldulensis. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 17: 429-38.
Horsch, R. B., J. E. Fry, N. L. Hoffman, D. Eichholtz, S. G. Rogers, and R. T. Fraley
(1985) A simple method of transferring genes into plants. Science 277: 1229-1231.
Hu, W. J., S. A. Harding, J. Lung, J. L. Popko, J. Ralph, D. D. Stokke, C. J. Tsai, and V. L. Chiang (1999) Repression of
lignin biosynthesis promotes cellulose ac-cumulation and growth in transgenic trees. Nature Biotechnology 17: 808-812.
Humphreys, J. M., and C. Chapple (2002) Rewriting the lignin roadmap. Current
Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 224-229. Hwang, S. Y, H. W. Lin, Y. S. Kuo, and T. P.
Lin (2001) RAPD variation in relation to population differentiation of Chamae-
cyparis formosensis and Chamaecyparis
taiwanensis. Botanical Bulletin Academia Sinica 42: 173-179.
Inoue, K., V. J. H. Sewalt, G. M. Balance, W. Ni, C. Stürzer, and R. A. Dixon (1998) Developmental expression and substrate specificities of Alfalfa caffeic acid
3-O-methyltransferase and caffeoyl coen-zyme A 3-O-methyltransferase in relation to lignification. Plant Physiology 117: 761-770.
Kawaoka, S., W. Laosinchai, T. Itoh, X. Cui,
!"#$%& (Quarterly Journal of Chinese Forestry) 41(3):323'338(2008) '337'
C. R. Linder, and R. M. Brown Jr. (2000) Functional analysis of tobacco LIM pro-tein Ntlim1 involved in lignin biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 22: 289-301.
Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Cleavage of struc-tural proteins during the assembly of the head Bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685.
Li, L., Y. Osakabe, C. P. Joshi, and V. L. Chiang (1999) Secondary xylem-spe-
cific expression of caffeoyl-coenzyme A 3-O-methyltransferase plays an important role in the methylation pathway associated with lignin biosynthesis in loblolly pine. Plant Molecular Biology 40: 555-565.
Li L., Y. Zhou, X. Cheng, J. Sun, J. M. Marita, J. Ralph, and V. L. Chiang (2003) Combinatorial modification of multiple lignin traits in trees through multigene co-transformation. Proceedings of the Na-
tional Academy of Sciences of the United Statess of America 100: 4939-4944.
Pincon, G., S. Maury, L. Hoffmann, P. Geof-froy, C. Lapierre, B. Pollet, and M. Le-grand (2001) Repression of
O-methyltransferase genes in transgenic tobacco affects lignin synthesis and plant growth. Phytochemistry 57: 1167-1176.
Raven, P. H., R. F. Evert, and S. E. Eichhorn (1999) Biology of Plants. Sixth edition. W.H. Freeman and Company/Worth Pub-
lishers. 554-670. Sederoff, R. R., J. J. MacKay, J. Ralph, and
R. D. Hatfield (1999) Unexpected varia-tion in lignin. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2: 145-152.
Sewalt, V. J. H., W. Ni, J. W. Blount, H. G. Jung, P. A. Howles, S. A. Masoud, S. A. Lamb, and R. A. Dixon (1997) Re-duced lignin content and altered lignin
composition in transgenic tobacco down-regulation in expression of phenyla-lanine ammonia-lyase or cinnamate 4-hydroxylase. Plant Physiology 115: 41-50.
Sutoh, K., and D. Yamauchi (2003) Two
cis-acting elements necessary and suffi-cient for gibberellin-upregulated pro-teinase expression in rice seeds. Plant Journal 34: 635-645.
Tamagnone, L., A. Merida, A. Parr, S.
Mackey, F. A. Culianex-Macia, K. Rob-erts, and C. Martin (1998) The Am-MYB308 and AmMYB330 transcription factors from Antirrhinum regulate phenyl-propanoid and lignin biosynthesis in
transgenic tobacco. The Plant Cell 10: 135-154.
Vanes, C. P., T. K. Kirk, and R. T. Sherwood (1980) Lignification as a mechanism of disease resistance. Annual Review of
Phytopathology 18: 259-288. Wesley, S. V., C. A. Helliwell, N. A. Smith,
M. Wang, D. T. Rouse, O. Liu, P. S. Goodling, S. P. Singh, D. Abbott, P. A. Stoutjesdijk, S. P. Robinson, A. P. Gleave, A. G. Green, and P. M. Waterhouse
(2001) Construct design for efficient, effective and high-throughput gene si-lencing in plants. The Plant Journal 27: 581-590.
Ye, Z. H., R. E. Kneusel, U. Matern and J. E.
'338' YZ Caffeoyl-CoA 3-O-methyltransferase Be;]^lGCBeÀ¨*+,��
Varner (1994) An alternative methyla-tion pathway in lignin biosynthesis in Zin-nia. The Plant Cell 6: 1427-1439.
Zhang X. H., and V. L. Chiang (1997)
Molecular cloning of 4-coumarate: coen-
zyme A ligase in loblolly pine and the roles of this enzyme in the biosynthesis of lignin in compression wood. Plant Physi-ology 113: 65-74.