· attachments by the ptolemaic, seleucid and bactrian kings. it is generally accepted that it...

22

Upload: vandung

Post on 09-Jul-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 2:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 3:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 4:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 5:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 6:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 7:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 8:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 9:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 10:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 11:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 12:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 13:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 14:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 15:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 16:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 17:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 18:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 19:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 20:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 21:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315
Page 22:  · attachments by the Ptolemaic, Seleucid and Bactrian kings. It is generally accepted that it first appeared on a tetradrachm of Ptolemy I in c. 320-315