© 2009 pearson education, inc. publishing as prentice hall 1 chapter 3: modeling data in the...

36
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Modeling Data in the Organization Organization

Upload: carmel-shelton

Post on 26-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice HallHall 11

Chapter 3:Chapter 3:Modeling Data in the Modeling Data in the

OrganizationOrganization

Page 2: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 22

ObjectivesObjectives Definition of termsDefinition of terms Importance of data modelingImportance of data modeling Write good names and definitions for entities, Write good names and definitions for entities,

relationships, and attributesrelationships, and attributes Distinguish unary, binary, and ternary relationshipsDistinguish unary, binary, and ternary relationships Model different types of attributes, entities, Model different types of attributes, entities,

relationships, and cardinalitiesrelationships, and cardinalities Draw E-R diagrams for common business situationsDraw E-R diagrams for common business situations Convert many-to-many relationships to associative Convert many-to-many relationships to associative

entitiesentities Model time-dependent data using time stampsModel time-dependent data using time stamps

Page 3: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 33

E-R Model ConstructsE-R Model Constructs Entities:Entities:

Entity instance–person, place, object, event, concept (often Entity instance–person, place, object, event, concept (often corresponds to a row in a table)corresponds to a row in a table)

Entity Type–collection of entities (often corresponds to a Entity Type–collection of entities (often corresponds to a table)table)

Relationships:Relationships: Relationship instance–link between entities (corresponds to Relationship instance–link between entities (corresponds to

primary key-foreign key equivalencies in related tables)primary key-foreign key equivalencies in related tables) Relationship type–category of relationship…link between Relationship type–category of relationship…link between

entity typesentity types

Attribute–Attribute–property or characteristic of an entity or property or characteristic of an entity or relationship type (often corresponds to a field in a table)relationship type (often corresponds to a field in a table)

Page 4: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 44

Sample E-R Diagram (Figure 3-1)

Page 5: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 55

Relationship degrees specify number of entity types involved

Entity symbols

A special entity that is also a relationship

Relationship symbols

Relationship cardinalities specify how many of each entity type is allowed

Attribute symbols

Basic E-R notation (Figure 3-2)

Page 6: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 66

What Should an Entity Be?What Should an Entity Be? SHOULD BE:SHOULD BE:

An object that will have many An object that will have many instances in the databaseinstances in the database

An object that will be composed of An object that will be composed of multiple attributesmultiple attributes

An object that we are trying to modelAn object that we are trying to model SHOULD NOT BE:SHOULD NOT BE:

A user of the database system A user of the database system An output of the database system An output of the database system

(e.g., a report)(e.g., a report)

Page 7: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 77

Inappropriate entities

System System useruser

System System outputoutput

Figure 3-4 Example of inappropriate entities

Appropriate entities

Page 8: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 88

A Good Data Name Is:A Good Data Name Is: Related to business, not technical, Related to business, not technical,

characteristicscharacteristics Meaningful and self-documentingMeaningful and self-documenting UniqueUnique ReadableReadable Composed of words from an approved listComposed of words from an approved list RepeatableRepeatable Follows standard syntaxFollows standard syntax

Page 9: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 99

AttributesAttributes Attribute–property or characteristic Attribute–property or characteristic

of an entity or relationship typeof an entity or relationship type Classifications of attributes:Classifications of attributes:

Required versus Optional AttributesRequired versus Optional Attributes Simple versus Composite AttributeSimple versus Composite Attribute Single-Valued versus Multivalued Single-Valued versus Multivalued

AttributeAttribute Stored versus Derived AttributesStored versus Derived Attributes Identifier AttributesIdentifier Attributes

Page 10: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1010

Identifiers (Keys)Identifiers (Keys)

Identifier (Key)–an attribute (or Identifier (Key)–an attribute (or combination of attributes) that combination of attributes) that uniquely uniquely and and minimallyminimally identifies identifies individual instances of an entity typeindividual instances of an entity type

Simple versus Composite IdentifierSimple versus Composite Identifier Candidate Identifier–an attribute that Candidate Identifier–an attribute that

could be a key…satisfies the could be a key…satisfies the requirements for being an identifierrequirements for being an identifier

Page 11: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1111

Characteristics of IdentifiersCharacteristics of Identifiers

Will not change in valueWill not change in value Will not be null (blank)Will not be null (blank) No intelligent identifiers (e.g., containing No intelligent identifiers (e.g., containing

locations or people that might change)locations or people that might change) Substitute new, simple keys for long, Substitute new, simple keys for long,

composite keys – artificial key, enterprise composite keys – artificial key, enterprise key (SSN, peoplesoftID, employee ID, key (SSN, peoplesoftID, employee ID, product #)product #)

Page 12: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1212

Figure 3-7 A composite attribute

An attribute broken into component parts

Figure 3-8 Entity with multivalued attribute (Skill) and derived attribute (Years_Employed)

Multivaluedan employee can have more than one skill

Derivedfrom date employed and current date

Page 13: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1313

Figure 3-9 Simple and composite identifier attributes

The identifier is boldfaced and underlined

Page 14: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1414

Figure 3-19 Simple example of time-stamping

This attribute is both multivalued and composite

Page 15: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1515

More on RelationshipsMore on Relationships Relationship Types vs. Relationship InstancesRelationship Types vs. Relationship Instances

The relationship type is modeled as lines between The relationship type is modeled as lines between entity types…the instance is between specific entity types…the instance is between specific entity instancesentity instances

Relationships can have attributesRelationships can have attributes These describe features pertaining to the association These describe features pertaining to the association

between the entities in the relationshipbetween the entities in the relationship

Two entities can have more than one type of Two entities can have more than one type of relationship between them (multiple relationship between them (multiple relationships)relationships)

Associative Entity–combination of Associative Entity–combination of relationship and entityrelationship and entity

Page 16: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1616

Figure 3-10 Relationship types and instances

a) Relationship type

b) Relationship instances

Page 17: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1717

Degree of RelationshipsDegree of Relationships

Degree of a relationship is Degree of a relationship is the number of entity types the number of entity types that participate in itthat participate in itUnary RelationshipUnary RelationshipBinary RelationshipBinary RelationshipTernary RelationshipTernary Relationship

Page 18: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1818

Degree of relationships – from Figure 3-2

Entities of two different types related to each other Entities of three

different types related to each other

One entity related to another of the same entity type

Page 19: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 1919

Cardinality of RelationshipsCardinality of Relationships

One-to-OneOne-to-One Each entity in the relationship will have exactly Each entity in the relationship will have exactly

one related entityone related entity One-to-ManyOne-to-Many

An entity on one side of the relationship can An entity on one side of the relationship can have many related entities, but an entity on have many related entities, but an entity on the other side will have a maximum of one the other side will have a maximum of one related entityrelated entity

Many-to-ManyMany-to-Many Entities on both sides of the relationship can Entities on both sides of the relationship can

have many related entities on the other sidehave many related entities on the other side

Page 20: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2020

Cardinality ConstraintsCardinality Constraints Cardinality Constraints—the number of Cardinality Constraints—the number of

instances of one entity that can or must instances of one entity that can or must be associated with each instance of be associated with each instance of another entityanother entity

Minimum CardinalityMinimum Cardinality If zero, then optionalIf zero, then optional If one or more, then mandatoryIf one or more, then mandatory

Maximum CardinalityMaximum Cardinality The maximum numberThe maximum number

Page 21: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2121

Figure 3-12 Examples of relationships of different degrees

a) Unary relationships

Page 22: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2222

Figure 3-12 Examples of relationships of different degrees (cont.)

b) Binary relationships

Page 23: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2323

Figure 3-12 Examples of relationships of different degrees (cont.)

c) Ternary relationship

Note: a relationship can have attributes of its own

Page 24: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2424

Figure 3-17 Examples of cardinality constraints

a) Mandatory cardinalities

A patient must have recorded at least one history, and can have many

A patient history is recorded for one and only one patient

Page 25: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2525

Figure 3-17 Examples of cardinality constraints (cont.)

b) One optional, one mandatory

An employee can be assigned to any number of projects, or may not be assigned to any at all

A project must be assigned to at least one employee, and may be assigned to many

Page 26: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2626

Figure 3-17 Examples of cardinality constraints (cont.)

c) Optional cardinalities

A person is married to at most one other person, or may not be married at all

At least one

At most one

Any number

Exact one

Page 27: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2727

Entities can be related to one another in more than one way

Figure 3-21 Examples of multiple relationships

a) Employees and departments

Page 28: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2828

Figure 3-21 Examples of multiple relationships (cont.)

b) Professors and courses (fixed lower limit constraint)

Here, min cardinality constraint is 2

Page 29: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 2929

Figure 3-15a and 3-15b Multivalued attributes can be represented as relationships

simple

composite

Page 30: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3030

Strong vs. Weak Entities, andStrong vs. Weak Entities, andIdentifying RelationshipsIdentifying Relationships

Strong entities Strong entities exist independently of other types of entitiesexist independently of other types of entities has its own unique identifierhas its own unique identifier identifier underlined with single lineidentifier underlined with single line

Weak entityWeak entity dependent on a strong entity (identifying owner)…cannot exist on its dependent on a strong entity (identifying owner)…cannot exist on its

ownown does not have a unique identifier (only a partial identifier)does not have a unique identifier (only a partial identifier) partial identifier underlined with double linepartial identifier underlined with double line entity box has double lineentity box has double line

Identifying relationshipIdentifying relationship links strong entities to weak entitieslinks strong entities to weak entities

Page 31: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3131

Strong entity Weak entity

Identifying relationship (Figure 3-5)

Page 32: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3232

Associative EntitiesAssociative Entities An An entityentity–has attributes–has attributes

A A relationshiprelationship–links entities together–links entities together

When should a When should a relationship with attributesrelationship with attributes instead be instead be an an associative entityassociative entity? ? All relationships for the associative entity should be manyAll relationships for the associative entity should be many The associative entity could have meaning independent of the The associative entity could have meaning independent of the

other entitiesother entities The associative entity preferably has a unique identifier, and The associative entity preferably has a unique identifier, and

should also have other attributesshould also have other attributes The associative entity may participate in other relationships The associative entity may participate in other relationships

other than the entities of the associated relationshipother than the entities of the associated relationship Ternary relationships should be converted to associative Ternary relationships should be converted to associative

entitiesentities

Page 33: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3333

Figure 3-11a A binary relationship with an attribute

Here, the date completed attribute pertains specifically to the employee’s completion of a course…it is an attribute of the relationship

Page 34: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3434

Figure 3-13c An associative entity – bill of materials structure

This could just be a relationship with attributes…it’s a judgment call

Page 35: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3535

Figure 3-18 Ternary relationship as an associative entity

Vendor Part Warehouse Shipping_mode Unit_cost

A 1 W1 G 12

B 1 W2 E 20

D 2 W2 G 5

D 3 W1 E 14

Page 36: © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization

Chapter 3 © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.  Publishing as Prentice Hall 3636

Microsoft Visio Notation for Pine Valley Furniture

E-R diagram

(Figure 3-22)

Different modeling software tools may have different notation for the same constructs