© 2008the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. all rights reserved. foundations of motivation copyright ©...

80
© 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Chapter 8 8 Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights rese McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Upload: sherman-murphy

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

© 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

ChapterChapter 8 8

Foundations of Motivation

Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Page 2: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Ch. 8 Learning Objectives1. Contrast Maslow’s, Alderfer’s, and McClelland’s

need theories.2. Explain the practical significance of Herzberg’s

distinction between motivators and hygiene factors.

3. Discuss the role of perceived inequity in employee motivation.

4. Explain the differences among distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.

5. Describe the practical lessons derived from equity theory.

8-2

Page 3: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Ch. 8 Learning Objectives

6. Explain Vroom’s expectancy theory and review its practical implications., racial and ethnic, and disability stereotypes.

7. Explain how goal setting motivates an individual and review the four practical lessons from goal-setting research.

8. Review the mechanistic, motivational, biological, and perceptual-motor approaches to job design.

8-3

Page 4: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Motivation

Motivation

psychological processes that arouse and direct goal-directed behaviorDoes high motivation mean better job performance?•A=Yes, B=No

Is money the only motivator? 8-4

Page 5: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Theories of Motivation

Content Theories• Identify internal

factors influencing motivation

Maslow’s Need HierarchyAlderfer’s ERGMcClelland’s NeedHerzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene

Process Theories• Identify the process

by which internal factors and cognitions influence motivation

Adam’s EquityVroom’s ExpectancyGoal Setting Theory

8-5

Page 6: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Motivation Theories

8-6

Page 7: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory

How does the theory work?What research support does this theory have?What are the managerial implications of this theory?

8-7

Page 8: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Employee’s Varying Needs

8-8

Page 9: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Alderfer’s ERG Theory

Existence: Desire for physiological and materialistic well-beingRelatedness: Desire to have meaningful relationships with significant othersGrowth: Desire to grow and use one’s abilities to their fullest potential

How does this theory work?

What is the research support?

What are the managerial implications?

8-9

Page 10: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McClelland’s Need TheoryThe Need for Achievement • Desire to accomplish

something difficult

The Need for Affiliation • Desire to spend time

in social relationships and activities

The Need for Power • Desire to influence,

coach, teach, or encourage others to achieve

8-10

Page 11: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

McClelland’s Needs Theory in Practice

1. Is high need for power good or bad?A= Good, B=Bad, C= It depends

2. What is the most important need for leaders?a. Achievementb. Affiliationc. Power

3. What is the least important?a. Achievementb. Affiliationc. Power

8-11

Page 12: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Test Your Knowledge

A manager made the following work assignments based on her perception of her employee’s needs. Sam – responsible for orienting new employees to the team; Rex – responsible for operations of an entire division; Jose – researcher in R & D. Which of the following set of pairs below is probably true?

a. Sam- power; Rex- achievement; Jose- affiliation; b. Sam – affiliation; Rex- power; Jose – achievementc. Sam – achievement, Rex – affiliation, Jose – powerd. Sam – achievement; Rex – power; Jose - affiliation

8-12

Page 13: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Model

Hygiene Factors job characteristics associated with job dissatisfaction• Salary• Supervisory relations• Working conditions

Motivators job characteristics associated with job satisfaction• Achievement• Recognition• Responsibility

8-13

Page 14: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Model

Basic premise: Job satisfaction is not a continuum from satisfied to dissatisfiedRather, there are two continuums•No Satisfaction …… Satisfaction•Dissatisfaction ……No dissatisfaction

8-14

Page 15: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Model

8-15

Page 16: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Comparison of Content Theories of Motivation

Self-Actualization

EsteemEsteem

BelongingnessBelongingness

SafetySafety

PhysiologicalPhysiological

Growth

RelatednessRelatedness

ExistenceExistence

Motivator--HygieneTheory

Motivators

HygienesHygienes

Need forAchievement

Need forNeed forPowerPower

Need forNeed forAffiliationAffiliation

McClelland’sLearned Needs

ERGTheory

Needs HierarchyTheory

8-16

Page 17: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Equity Theory

Equity theory – people strive for fairness and justice in social exchangesPeople will be motivated to the extent their perceived inputs to outcomes is in balance

A. Compare personal outcomes to inputs.B. Compare your outcomes to relevant others:

1. Comparisons to teammates or coworkers2. Comparisons to another group (e.g.

department/unit)3. Comparisons to others in your field or

occupational.8-17

Page 18: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

A. An Equitable Situation

SelfSelf OtheOtherr

$2

1 hour

= $2 per hour$4

2 hours

= $2 per hour

Equity Theory

8-18

Page 19: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

$2

1 hour

= $2 per hour$3

1 hour

= $3 per hour

B. Negative Inequity

Self Other

Equity Theory

8-19

Page 20: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

$2

1 hours

= $1 per hour

C. Positive Inequity

$3

1 hour

= $3 per hour

SelfSelf OtheOtherr

Equity Theory

8-20

Page 21: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Test Your Knowledge

Deena works 60 hours per week and does not feel that she is being adequately recognized or rewarded. According to equity theory, Deena is least likely to:

a. Ask for a raise or bonusb. Reduce her efforts by decreasing her hoursc. Increase her efforts by working longer hoursd. Frame the situation as a learning experience

and beneficial for her future career.

8-21

Page 22: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

For Discussion: Assess Yourself – Equity Sensitivity

Which of the following best describes you? In most situations, I…

a. put in more than I get out, which is fine with me

b. typically strive for equity and fairness in terms of my inputs and outcomes (even if I feel positive inequity)

c. try to put in as little effort as possible to attain desired rewards

8-22

Page 23: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Equity Sensitivity

Equity Sensitivity an individual’s tolerance for negative and positive equity •Benevolents have a higher tolerance for

negative inequity

•Sensitives adhere to strict norm of reciprocity

•Entitleds have no tolerance for negative inequity

8-23

Page 24: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Organizational JusticeDistributive Justice the perceived fairness of how resources and rewards are distributed

Procedural Justice the perceived fairness of the process and procedure used to make allocation decisions

Interactional Justice extent to which people feel fairly treated when procedures are implemented

8-24

Page 25: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Lessons From Equity Theory & Justice

8-25

Page 26: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

E-to-PExpectancy

P-to-OInstrumentality

Outcomes& Valences

Outcome 1+ or -

Effort Performance

Outcome 3+ or -

Outcome 2+ or -

Expectancy Theory of Motivation

8-26

Page 27: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Test Your Knowledge

For each of the following actions, indicate which part of the expectancy model, specifically, would be improved for an unmotivated employee?

A. Effort to Performance (Expectancy)B. Performance to Outcome (Instrumentality)C. Value of rewards (Valence)

1. Show direct link between performance and raises.

2. Set clear goals, establish positive expectations3. Base rewards on what the employee values.4. Establish a pay for performance plan.5. Provide adequate resources and training.

8-27

Page 28: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Implications of Expectancy Theory

8-28

Page 29: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Goal-Setting Theory

Goal what an individual is trying to accomplish

8-29

Page 30: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Locke’s Model of Goal Setting

Encouraging thedevelopment of goal-attainment strategies

or action plans

Increasingone’s persistence

Regulatingone’s effort

Directingone’s attention

Goalsmotivate the

individualby...

Taskperformance

8-30

Page 31: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Guidelines for SMART Goals

SSpecific

MMeasurable

AAttainable

RResults oriented

TTime bound

Give feedback regularly!

8-31

Page 32: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Test Your Knowledge

True (A) or False (B)?1) “Do your best” goals maximize performance2) Feedback enhances the effect of specific,

difficult goals3) Participative goals, assigned goals, and self-

set goals are equally effective4) Goal commitment affects goal-setting

outcomes5) Monetary incentives for goals always improve

goal-setting outcomes8-32

Page 33: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Job Design Approaches to Motivation

Job Design: Changing the content or process of a specific job to increase job satisfaction and performance

Motivational strategies:Job Rotation moving employees from one specialized job to another

Job Enlargement putting more variety into a jobJob Enrichment building achievement, recognition, responsibility, and advancement into the work

8-33

Page 34: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

The Job Characteristics Model

High work effectiveness

High growth satisfaction High general job satisfaction

High intrinsic work motivation

Outcomes

Knowledge of the actual results of the work activities

Experienced responsibility for outcomes of the work

Experienced meaningfulness of work

Criticalpsychological

state

Feedback from job

Autonomy

Skill variety Task identity Task significance

Core job

characteristics

Moderators1. Knowledge and skill2. Growth need

strength3. Context satisfaction

8-34

Page 35: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Applying Job Characteristics Model

Steps for applying the job characteristics model

8-35

Page 36: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

© 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

ChapterChapter 8 8

Foundations of Motivation

Supplemental Slides

Page 37: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Action Planning in Practice

Fortune, 9/29/08, pg. 108 8-37

Page 38: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Shareholders Ideas to Reduce Pay Inequity

Tuna, C. Shareholders to Focus on Executive Compensation, Wall Street Journal, 1/12/2009

8-38

Page 39: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Pay Equity and Motivation

Binkley, C. Wall Street Journal, Summer/Fall 2008 8-39

Page 40: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Employee Engagement and Motivation

Source: Bos, J. Building Engagement in an Economic Crisis, Workforce Management, April 20, 2009 8-40

Page 41: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Drives that Underlie Motivation

Source: Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Employee Motivation: A powerful new model, Harvard Business Review. 8-41

Page 42: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Organizational Levers

Source: Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Employee Motivation: A powerful new model, Harvard Business Review. 8-42

Page 43: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Organizational Levers in Practice

Source: Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Employee Motivation: A powerful new model, Harvard Business Review.

8-43

Page 44: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Questions to Ask BeforeSetting Goals (con’t)

Source: Ordonez, L. Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., Bazerman, M. H. Goals gone Wild: The systematic Side effects of overprescribing goal setting; Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, February, 2009, pg. 6-16

8-44

Page 45: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Questions to Ask Before Setting Goals (con’t)

Source: Ordonez, L. Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., Bazerman, M. H. Goals gone Wild: The systematic Side effects of overprescribing goal setting; Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, February, 2009, pg. 6-16 8-45

Page 46: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Questions to Ask Before Setting Goals (con’t)

Source: Ordonez, L. Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., Bazerman, M. H. Goals gone Wild: The systematic Side effects of overprescribing goal setting; Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, February, 2009, pg. 6-16 8-46

Page 47: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Job Characteristic Mismatches

Source: Kalleberg, A. L. (2008). The Mismatched Worker: When People Don’t Fit Their Jobs. Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 22, pg. 24-40. 8-47

Page 48: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Mismatches and Motivation

Source: Kalleberg, A. L. (2008). The Mismatched Worker: When People Don’t Fit Their Jobs. Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 22, pg. 24-40. 8-48

Page 49: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Video Cases

Hot TopicMotivation Convention

8-49

Page 50: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Management in the MoviesAmerican Pie

In this scene, Heather (Mena Suvari) is talking to Oz (Chris Klein) about plans after graduation.Questions• How do direction, effort, and persistence play into

Heather’s college choice?• Why does Oz work?

8-50

Page 51: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Management in the MoviesThe Terminal – “The Carts”

In this scene, Viktor discovers a way to earn money in the terminal.What was Viktor’s motivation to find a way to earn money?Why was this opportunity available?

8-51

Page 52: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Rewarding Exempt Employees

The revised FLSA allows companies to pay exempt employees for extra time workedOrganizations are successful at motivating the right behaviors when they reward them appropriatelyThink outside the box:• Meals to take home to families after working long

hours• Movie/sporting event tickets• Gift cards• Extra time offSource: Rewarding Exempt Employees, September 2006, HR Magazine, Susan

Ladika 8-52

Page 53: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

The Snowfly Slots

Companies are using games to motivate employee’s behaviorFor taking actions that are aligned with the organization’s objectives employees receive tokensTokens are used on an on-line slot machine called “Snowfly”Employees can win between 2 cents and $50 per gameThis strategy has boosted productivity in a variety of organizations including banks and beverage distributors

Source: New Incentives for Workers Combine Cash, Fun, J. Badal, Wall Street Journal, 6/19/06

8-53

Page 54: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Getting Rewards Right

Set specific goals and reward achievement quickly; don’t wait until the end of the year.Give employees reward choices, to reflect different tastesRemind employees about goals and possible rewardsKeep the program fresh; update prices to generate enthusiasmEnsure that front-line managers are committed to the program

Source: New Incentives for Workers Combine Cash, Fun, J. Badal, Wall Street Journal, 6/19/06

8-54

Page 55: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Office Space Movie Clip

Which type of organizational justice (or injustice) is being displayed in this clip?Do you agree with the advice of the consultants? Why or why not?In the real world, what effect might this approach have on employees and the organization as a whole?

8-55

Page 56: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Office Space Movie Clip #2

Does Peter believe his effort will lead to better performance?Does Peter believe his performance will lead to an outcome?Does Peter value the outcomes he’s been receiving?What impact does the management structure have on Peter?

8-56

Page 57: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Factors that Drive Engagement

Sr. Management’s interest in employees’ well-beingChallenging workDecision-making authority.Evidence that the company is focused on customers.Career advancement opportunitiesCompany’s reputation as a good employerCollaborative work environmentResources to get the job done Input on decision making 8-57

Page 58: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Factors that Drive Employee Commitment

The company’s care and concern for employeesFairness at workFeelings of accomplishmentDay-to-day satisfactionAppreciation of ideas

8-58

Page 59: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Underlying Propositions of ERG Theory

Satisfied Needs

Desires for

Need Frustration

ExistenceExistence1

Relatedness

24

Growth

5

Relatedness

Existence3

Growth

Relatedness6

Growth7

8-59

Page 60: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Employee Engagement

Engaged

ActivelyDisengaged

Not Engaged

Employee Engagement at Companies That Did Respond to September 11

8-60

Page 61: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Employee Engagement

Engaged

ActivelyDisengaged

Not Engaged

Employee Engagement at Companies That Did Not Respond to September 11

8-61

Page 62: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Employee Engagement

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

ActivelyDisengaged

Not Engaged

Engaged

Overall Rating of Company’s Response

8-62

Page 63: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Time Spent with Company

Employee Engagement: An Inverse Relationship

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Lessthan 6mos.

6 mos.to lessthan 3

yrs.

3 to lessthan 10

yrs.

10 yrs.or more

Percentage ofEngaged Workers

8-63

Page 64: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Working withoutdealing withworkplacebureacracy

Knowing job has alarger purpose

Having clear,work-related goals

Seeing results ofeffort

Boosting Productivity

8-64

Page 65: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Sense of Purpose

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Work I do isvery

important orimportant

Half isimportant,

half isbusywork

Work ismostly orentirely

busywork

72%

23%

5%

8-65

Page 66: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Employee Theft on the Rise

Employee theft at retail stores: $14.9 billion in 2000Employee theft responsible for 46% retail shrinkage—more than shoplifters30 major retail chains caught 73,300 employees stealingEmployee theft costs companies $20 billion to $40 billion a year

8-66

Page 67: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Flexible Pay Growing in Popularity

0%10%20%30%

40%50%60%70%

80%90%

100%

'96 '98 '00 Est.

Some form ofvariable pay*

Stock options**

8-67

Page 68: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts

A psychological contract refers to the beliefs held by an individual employee regarding the terms of the exchange agreement between that employee and his/her organization.

8-68

Page 69: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts Cont.

Survey participants reported• Which psychological obligations were most

important,• The extent to which their organization had

fulfilled its obligations,• Their job satisfaction,• Their intent to leave the organization,• Their perceived performance on the job,• Organizational citizenship behaviors.

8-69

Page 70: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts Cont.

The most important psychological contract items include:• opportunities for promotion & advancement,• trust & respect,• open & honest communication,• fair treatment,• challenging & interesting work.

8-70

Page 71: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts Cont.

Psychological contract items with the greatest discrepancy include:• competent management,• open & honest communication,• pay & bonuses tied to performance,• meaningful work,• clear goals & direction.

8-71

Page 72: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts Cont.

Relationship between psychological contract discrepancy scores and dependent measures:• 21 of 32 contract discrepancy scores were

positively correlated to intentions to leave the organization,

• 23 of 32 discrepancy scores were negatively related to job satisfaction,

• 4 of 32 discrepancy scores were negatively correlated to employee performance,

• 2 of 32 discrepancy scores were negatively correlated to organizational citizenship behaviors.

8-72

Page 73: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts Cont.

Managerial implications:• Organizations may focus on fulfilling the

most important psychological contract items (based on the survey information).

• When it has been necessary to make changes in the psychological contract, employers should attempt to “renegotiate” the contract to foster more accurate employee perceptions.

8-73

Page 74: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

21st Century Psychological Contracts Cont.

Managerial implications Cont.:• Fulfillment of psychological contract

obligations is a key way to retain top employees.

• Managers should ensure that employees are aware of organizational attempts to meet employee needs and keep organizational promises.

8-74

Page 75: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

A General Model of Expectancy Theory

High Effort

Low Effort

Performance Goal

Performance Goal

DecisionTo Exert

Effort

Outcome 1

Outcome 2

Outcome 3

Outcome 1

Outcome 2

Outcome 3

Expectancy: “What are my chances of reaching my goal if I work hard?”

Expectancy: “What are my chances of reaching my goal if I slack off?”

Instrumentality: “What are my chances of getting various outcomes if I achieve my goal?

Valence: “How much do I value these outcomes?”

8-75

Page 76: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Attractiveness of Achieving a Performance Goal

Vj = the attractiveness of

achieving a performance goal,

Ijk = the instrumentality

of outcome j for the attainment of outcome k,

Vk = the valence of

outcome k,

n = number of outcomes

Vj

= n

K = 1(VkIjk)

Where:

8-76

Page 77: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Force to Exert a Level of Effort

Fj = the force to exert a

certain level of effort

Eij = the expectancy of

attaining a performance goal if one exerts a certain level of effort

Vj = the attractiveness of

reaching the performance goal

Fj

= (EijVj)

Where:

8-77

Page 78: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Expectancy Theory Application

STEP 1. Valence represents the value placed on outcomes. Calculate the valence for all levels of performance. The equation is:

Performance Valence = [(Instrumentality1 x Valence1) + (I2 x V2) + (I3 x V3) + … (In x Vn)]

STEP 2. Calculate the force on an individual to exert different levels of effort. Force represents the strength of an individual’s intention to respond in a particular manner. The equation is:

Force = the sum of [Expectancy x Performance Valence] for all levels of performance associated with one level of effort.

STEP 3. Compare force values for each performance level.

8-78

Page 79: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

HIGH EFFORTWork hard for 10 hours a day

LOW EFFORTWork hard for 3 hours a day

PERFORMANCESubmit 3

manuscripts / year

PERFORMANCESubmit 1

manuscript / year

OUTCOME 1Publish 2

articles / year

OUTCOME 2Gain respect

& recognition

OUTCOME 3Spend more time

with spouse

OUTCOME 1Publish 1

article / 3 years

OUTCOME 3Get fired

OUTCOME 2Lose respect

& recognition

.90

.80

EXPECTANCY INSTRUMENTALITY VALENCE

.75

.70

-.9

.65

.80

.95

+5

+2

+3

+.5

-2

-6

8-79

Page 80: © 2008The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Motivation Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved

Conclusion

Questions for discussion

8-80