© 2004 wadsworth, a division of thomson learning, inc 1 employment law
TRANSCRIPT
2
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Judicial Pecking Order• U.S. Constitution
– 5th Amendment (federal government)– 14th Amendment (state & local governments)
• Federal Laws (CRA, ADA, ADEA, FMLA, EPA)• Executive orders (Executive Order 11246 – Federal Contractors)
• Federal case law (interprets Constitution and federal laws)– U.S. Supreme Court– Circuit Courts of Appeal (12 circuits, Virginia is 4th)– U.S. District Courts
• Federal administrative guidelines– EEOC– OFCCP
3
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Problem Scope
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Year
$146.384.491,189
$136.087.987,259
$145.290.977,990
$176.789.080,680
$169.287.679,591
$210.583.677,444
$245.778.879,896
$247.877.980,840
$257.779.984,442
Monetary Benefits% UnwarrantedComplaints
4
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Potential Legal Problems
• Disparate treatment (intentional discrimination)
• Disparate impact (adverse impact)
• Invasion of privacy• Illegal search
5
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Employee Complaint Process
• Alleged discriminatory act• Internal investigation• Internal resolution process
– Essential to have a formal policy– Options
• Dictate a decision• Mediate a solution• Arbitrate a decision
– Appeal procedure is important
• External resolution process– State agencies in deferral states– EEOC– Law suit
6
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Alternative Dispute Resolution
• Mediation– Neutral third party
– Disputants reach agreement
• Arbitration– Neutral third party
– Arbitrator makes decision• Binding
• Nonbinding
• Dictation– Third party makes decision
7
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
EEOC Complaint Process1. Alleged discriminatory act
1. Complaint filed
a. 180 days for nondeferral states
b. 300 days for deferral states
3. Employer notified within 10 days
4. Investigation (goal is to complete in 120 days)
a. Reasonable cause found
1) attempt to reach agreement
2) if no agreement, EEOC can file suit
b. Reasonable cause not found
1) right to sue letter issued to employee
2) employee has 90 days to file suit
8
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Civil Rights Act - Title VII
• Who is Covered– Private employers with
at least 15 employees
– Federal, state, and local governments
– Employment agencies
– Unions
– Americans working abroad for American companies
• Who is Exempt– Bona fide tax exempt
private clubs
– Indian tribes
– Individuals denied employment due to national security concerns
– Publicly elected officials and their personal staff
9
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Title VII Court Ordered Remedies• Disparate Impact Cases
– Reinstatement
– Back pay
– Seniority
– Front Pay
– Affirmative Action
– Attorneys’ Fees
• Disparate Treatment CasesSame as disparate impact +
– Compensatory damages• psychological damage
• actual expenses
• damage to reputation
– Punitive damages (private sector only)
– Damage Limits (no limit for race)
Employees Limit
15-100 $ 50,000
101-200 $100,000
201-500 $200,000
>500 $300,000
10
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Does Requirement Directly Refer to a Member of a Federally Protected Class?
• Sex (Civil Rights Act)– Male– Female
• Race (CRA)– African American– Asian American– White– Native American
• National origin (CRA)
• Color (CRA)• Age (over 40; ADEA)• Religion (CRA)• Disability (ADA)
– Current– Previous– Regarded as such
• Vietnam veteran• Pregnant female
11
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Does the Requirement Have Adverse Impact on Members of a Protected Class?Occurs when the selection rate for one group is less than 80% of the rate for the highest scoring group
Male Female
Number of applicants 50 30
Number hired 20 10
Selection ratio .40 .33
.33/.40 = .83 > .80 (no adverse impact)
12
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Employment Decisions• Hiring• Placement• Promotion• Assignment (shift, patrol zone)• Salary• Discipline• Training opportunities
13
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Does requirement directly refer to member of federally protected class?
Has case law, state law, or local law expanded definition of protected
class?
Does requirement have adverse impact?
Is requirement subterfuge for discrimination?
Is requirement job related?
Were alternatives with less adverse impact considered?
Probably Legal
Probably Illegal
Probably Illegal
Probably Illegal
Probably Illegal
Probably Legal
BFOQ?
yes
no
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
14
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
J
I
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
Question
This is a grooming standardNo
Education level is not a federally protected classNo
Color (Civil Rights Act)Yes
National Origin (Civil Rights Act)Yes
Only people over the age of 40 are protectedNo
Sex (Civil Rights Act)Yes
Sexual preference is not a federally protected classNo
Potential disability (ADA)Yes
Religion (Civil Rights Act)Yes
Only Viet Nam veterans are protectedNo
ReasonAnswer
15
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Is the Requirement a Bona Fide Occupational Qualification (BFOQ)?• Only members of a particular
class can perform the job• There can be no exceptions• According to the courts:
– Race can never be a BFOQ
– Religion has been (e.g., Nun, priest)
– Gender seldom is
– Customer preference doesn’t matter
16
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Has Local, State or Case Law Added Protected Classes?
• State Law Examples– Virginia protects marital status
– Wisconsin protects sexual orientation
• Local Law Examples– Cincinnati protects people of Appalachian heritage
– Santa Cruz, CA outlaws discrimination based on height and physical appearance
• Case Law Examples– Transsexuals are not a sex
– Former drug use is not a disability
17
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
01020304050607080
Asian White AfricanAmerican
Hispanic
Bachelor's Degree High School Diploma
Education Level
18
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Adverse Impact - Example 2
Male Female
Number of applicants 40 20
Number hired 20 4
Selection ratio .50 .20
.20/.50 = .40 < .80 (adverse impact)
19
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Was the Requirement a Subterfuge for Intentional Discrimination?
• Old voting requirements
• Residency requirements
• Height requirements
20
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Can the Employer Prove that the Requirement is Exempt or Job Related?
• Exemptions– Bona fide seniority
system
– Veteran’s preference rights
– National security
• Job Related– Types
• BFOQ
• Valid testing procedure
– Methods• Content validity
• Criterion validity
• Validity generalization
21
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Content Validity
• Based on a solid job analysis• A method of rationally
matching tasks with the necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics (KSAOs) to perform the job
22
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Criterion Validity
• Correlate test scores with relevant criteria
• Two types– Concurrent– Predictive
• Requirements– Reasonable sample size– Good range of test and criterion
scores– A good criterion
23
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Validity Generalization
• Based on meta-analysis• Borrows validity from other studies
or organizations• Job analysis results must be similar
24
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Did Employer Look for Reasonable Alternative with Less Adverse Impact?
• A different test measuring the same construct
• A different type of test• Changes to testing conditions
– video rather than written
– practice exams
– conditioning programs
• Job redesign
26
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
What is affirmative action?Is it a good idea?
27
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Affirmative Action Strategies
• Intentional recruitment of minority applicants• Removal of supervisor and employee prejudices• Identification and removal of employment
practices that work against minority employees• Preferential hiring and promotion of minorities
28
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Reasons for Affirmative Action Plans
• Involuntary– Government regulation
– Court order
• Voluntary– Consent decree
– Desire to be a good citizen• community relations
• customer relations
• hope that diversity will increase productivity
29
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Was there a history of discrimination?
Does the plan only benefitactual victims of discrimination?
What population was usedto establish goals?
Did plan trammel therights of nonminorities?
Is there an endingpoint to the plan?
Plan is illegal
Plan is Legal
Plan is illegal
Plan is illegal
Plan is illegal
Plan is Legal
No
Area
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Qualified Work Force
No
Yes
30
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Legality of Preferential HiringWas there a history of discrimination?
• A history of discrimination must be demonstrated
• Numeric disparity – can establish history
– numeric disparity by itself may not be enough
• Affirmative action posture and efforts will also be considered
• Other reasons, such as lack of interest in the position, must be considered along with the disparity
31
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Por
tsm
outh
Roa
nok
e
Ric
hm
ond
Va.
Bea
ch
Lyn
chb
urg
Pet
ersb
urg
Black Population %
Black Officer %
32
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Legality of Preferential HiringDoes the plan benefit people who were
not the actual victims of discrimination?
33
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Legality of Preferential HiringWhat population was used to establish
hiring or promotion goals?
• Area population• Qualified work force
– minimum standards
– minority interest in occupation
34
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Legality of Preferential HiringDid the plan trammel the rights of nonminorities?
• Magnitude of the goal must be reasonable
• All people hired must be qualified• Race/gender can be used to break
ties among equally qualified applicants
• Promotion spots can be “double filled”
35
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Legality of Preferential HiringIs there an ending point to the plan?
• Progress must be periodically reviewed• Plan must end when goals have been achieved
36
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Consequences of Affirmative Action Programs
• People hired due to affirmative action:– are perceived by coworkers as being less
competent– tend to devalue their own performance– behave negatively toward other AA people
• Organizations using AA based hiring have lover levels of productivity (Silva & Jacobs, 1993)
38
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
What examples of harassment haveyou seen in the workplace?
39
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
EEOC Complaints - 2002
• 14,396 charges of sexual harassment– 14.9% of the charges were
made by males – No reasonable cause found in
44.1% of charges – $54.6 million obtained in
settlements
• 6,116 charges of racial harassment
40
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Potential Victims of Harassment
• Gender• Race• Religion• Age• National Origin
– Alien status
– Citizenship status
• Disability• Sexual Preference
41
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Types of Harassment
• Quid Pro Quo
• Hostile Environment
42
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Quid Pro QuoHarassment Claims
• Granting of sexual favors is tied to employment decisions
• Single incident is enough
• Organization is always liable
43
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Hostile EnvironmentHarassment Claims
• Pattern of conduct• Related to gender• Is unwanted• Is negative to the
“reasonable person”• Affects a term, condition, or
privilege of employment
44
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Behaviors That Could Be Sexual Harassment
• Sexual comments• Undue attention• Verbal sexual abuse• Verbal sexual displays• Body language• Invitations• Physical advances• Explicit sexual invitations
45
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Types of Harassing Behavior
• Comments• Jokes• Posters• Cartoons• E-mail• Drawings
46
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Behaviors are offensive if they:
• Perpetuate stereotypes• Degrade another group• Build-up own group• Make others feel uncomfortable
47
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
What Causes Offensive Behavior?
• Hatred toward a group• To express an emotion
– Anger
– Frustration
• Ignorance• Attempts to gain power• To “fit in” with another
group
48
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Why is Harassment a Problem?
• Hurts workplace relationships• Causes emotional distress• Causes physical distress• Decreases productivity• Increases turnover and absenteeism• Increases legal liability
49
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Discouraging Harassment
• Don’t laugh at offensive behavior
• Speak your mind• Let employees know when
they are crossing the line
50
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
What to do if you think you are being harassed
• Talk to the individual– yellow light
– red light
• Talk to your supervisor or to the HR Director– all complaints are taken seriously
– an investigation will occur
– think about what you want the outcome to be
– don’t publicize your complaint
52
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Liability of the Organization
• Victims must be encouraged to come forward
• Every complaint or suspicion must be investigated
• Appropriate action must follow the investigation
53
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Investigating Complaints
• Investigation must be prompt• Complaints must be kept confidential to
protect the accused• Actions must be taken to protect the
accuser during the investigation• Due process• Appropriate action must be taken
54
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Americans With Disabilities Act
Organizations must make reasonable accommodation for the physically or
mentally disabled, unless to do so would impose an undue hardship
55
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Definition of Disability
• A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities
• A record of such impairment, or• Being regarded as having such an impairment
56
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Reasonable Accommodations• Making facilities accessible• restructuring jobs• Reassignment to a vacant position• Modifying work schedules• Acquisition or modification of equipment or
devices• Providing readers or interpreters• Changing examinations, training materials, or
policies
57
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Ways to Determine if a Job Function is Essential
• Employer’s judgment• Written job description• Amount of time spent performing the function• Consequence of not requiring the incumbent
to perform the function• Work experience of past job incumbents
58
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Medical Exams and Inquiries
• Prehire medical exams and inquiries are prohibited
• Applicants may be asked if they are able to perform essential job related functions
• Medical exams occur after a conditional offer of employment
59
© 2004 Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc
Clarifications• Act does not require an organization to hire
the disabled• Act does not require an organization to give
preference to the disabled• Act requires that the disabled be given an
equal opportunity, and if the best qualified, to be given the job