© 2003 mcgraw-hill ryerson limited 2 - 1 u the choices made by society are often presented in terms...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 1
The choices made by society are often presented in terms of a production possibility curve.
The production possibilities curve shows the trade-offs among choices we make.
The Production The Production Possibilities Curve and Possibilities Curve and Economic ReasoningEconomic Reasoning
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 2
The Production The Production Possibility TablePossibility Table A production possibility table lists the
maximum combination of outputs that can be obtained from a given number of inputs.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 3
The Production The Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve A production possibility curve plots
the maximum combination of outputs that can be achieved from a given number of inputs.
It slopes downward from left to right.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 4
The Production The Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve The production possibility curve not only
demonstrates the opportunity cost concept, it also measures the opportunity cost.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 5
The Production The Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve The production possibility curve
demonstrates that: There is a limit to what you can achieve, given the
existing institutions, resources, and technology. Every choice made has an opportunity cost—you can get
more of something only by giving up something else.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 6
Eco
nom
ics
grad
e
100
88
70
4640
58 66 78 94 98History grade
20 hours of history
0 hours of economics
ED
C
B
20 hours of economics 0 hours of historyA
Hours of study in history
Grade inhistory
Hours of study in economics
Grade ineconomics
20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
98 96 94 92 90 88 86 84 82 80 78 76 74 72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
40 43 46 49 52 55 58 61 64 67 70 73 76 79 82 85 88 91 94 97
100
The Production The Production Possibility Curve Possibility Curve Fig. 2-1 (a and Fig. 2-1 (a and
b), p 33b), p 33
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 7
Increasing Marginal Increasing Marginal Opportunity CostOpportunity Cost The production possibility curve is
generally bowed outward since some resources are better suited for the production of some goods.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 8
Increasing Marginal Increasing Marginal Opportunity CostOpportunity Cost The concept of comparative advantage
explains why opportunity costs increase as the consumption of a good increases.
Some resources are better suited for the production of some goods than to the production of other goods.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 9
Increasing Marginal Increasing Marginal Opportunity Cost, Opportunity Cost, p 33 p 33
Y
1098
6543210
.2Y
1X
A
X1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
If the slope of the production curve is -2 at A, the
opportunity cost of 1X is 2Y.
7
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 10
Increasing Marginal Increasing Marginal Opportunity CostOpportunity Cost The principle of increasing opportunity
cost states that opportunity costs increase the more you concentrate on an activity.
In order to get more of something, one must give up ever-increasing quantities of something else.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 11
A Production Possibility A Production Possibility Table, Table, Fig. 2-2a, p 34Fig. 2-2a, p 34
% of resources devoted toproduction of burgers
Number of burgers
% of resources devoted toproduction of DVDs
Number of DVDs Row
0 20 40 60 80
100
0 4 7 9 11 12
100 80 60 40 20 0
15 14 12 9 5 0
A B C D E F
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 12
1211
A Production Possibility A Production Possibility Curve, Curve, Fig. 2-2b, p 34Fig. 2-2b, p 34
AD
VD
s
Burgers4 7 90
1 burger
5 DVDs
5
9
15
3 burgers
2 DVDsB
C
D
E
F
14
12
4 burgers
1 DVD
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 13
Increasing Marginal Increasing Marginal Opportunity Cost, Opportunity Cost, p 35p 35
DV
Ds
Slope is flat at A. Low opportunity cost of burgers.
Slope is steep at B. High opportunity cost of burgers.
Burgers
B
A
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 14
EfficiencyEfficiency
In our production, we would like to have productive efficiency—achieving as much output as possible from a given amount of inputs or resources.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 15
EfficiencyEfficiency
Any point within the production possibility curve represents inefficiency—getting less output from inputs which, if devoted to some other activity, would produce more output.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 16
EfficiencyEfficiency
Any point outside the production possibility curve represents something unattainable, given present resources and technology.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 17
Efficiency and Inefficiency, Efficiency and Inefficiency, Fig. 2-3a, p 36Fig. 2-3a, p 36
DV
Ds
10
8
6
4
2
0 2 4 6 8 10
Burgers
C D
A
B
Efficientpoints
Inefficientpoint
Unattainable point, given available technology, resources and labor force
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 18
Shifts in the Production Shifts in the Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve Society can produce more output if:
Technology is improved. More resources are discovered. Economic institutions get better at
fulfilling our wants.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 19
Shifts in the Production Shifts in the Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve An outward shift in the production
possibility curve indicates more output that can be produced with given inputs.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 20
Neutral Technological Change
DVDs
A
B Burgers0
Shifts in the Production Shifts in the Production Possibility Curve, Possibility Curve, Fig. 2-3b, p Fig. 2-3b, p
3636
C
D
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 21
Biased Technological Change
Shifts in the Production Shifts in the Production Possibility Curve, Possibility Curve, Fig. 2-3c, p Fig. 2-3c, p
3636
0
B
A
DVDs
Burgers
C
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 22
Distribution and Distribution and Production EfficiencyProduction Efficiency The production possibilities curve
focuses on productive efficiency and ignores distribution.
An increase in output that goes to one person and not to anyone else would not necessarily be efficient in some societies.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 23
Distribution and Distribution and Production EfficiencyProduction Efficiency Economists often talk about efficiency
as if it means productive efficiency and achieving society's goals.
In our society, more is generally preferred to less and many policies have relatively small distributional effects.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 24
Examples of Shifts in Examples of Shifts in the Production the Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve If more inputs are available for the
production of X and Y equally, the PPC shifts out along both X and Y axes.
If fewer inputs are available for the production of X and Y equally, the PPC shifts in along both X and Y axes.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 25
Examples of Shifts in Examples of Shifts in the Production the Production Possibility CurvePossibility Curve If more inputs are available for good X
only, the PPC shifts out on the X axis only.
If more inputs are available for good Y only, the PPC shifts out on the Y axis only.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 26
(a) (c) (d)(b)
Examples of Shifts in the Examples of Shifts in the Production Possibility Production Possibility CurveCurve Fig. 2-4, p 37Fig. 2-4, p 37
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 27Comparative Comparative Advantage, Advantage, Specialization, and Specialization, and TradeTrade The production possibility curve
becomes bowed out when individuals specialize in the production of goods for which they have a comparative advantage and trade with others.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 28Comparative Comparative Advantage, Advantage, Specialization, and Specialization, and TradeTrade The comparative advantage argument
used to explain the bowed-out shape of the production possibilities curve can be used to show how trade makes society better off.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 29Comparative Comparative Advantage, Advantage, Specialization, and Specialization, and TradeTrade Collaboration and specialization can
make society better off. Total production can rise.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 30Comparative Comparative Advantage, Advantage, Specialization, and Specialization, and TradeTrade The outward bow graphically represents
the potential gains from trade.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 31
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
Sunder can either write one economics paper or four creative writing papers in a day.
Ti can either write one creative writing paper or four economics papers in a day.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 32
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
Sunder has a comparative advantage in creating writing and Ti has a comparative advantage in economics.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 33
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
The following table and production possibility curves demonstrate how output increases when two individuals collaborate and specialize in the activity for which each has a comparative advantage.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 34
The Gains From Trade, The Gains From Trade, Fig. 2-Fig. 2-6a, p 416a, p 41
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 35
The Gains From Trade, The Gains From Trade, Fig. 2-Fig. 2-6b, p 416b, p 41
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 36
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
Each individual's PPC is drawn by connecting the number of papers each can write in a day on a graph.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 37
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade,,Fig. 2-Fig. 2-
6c, p 416c, p 41E
cono
mic
s
1 2 3 4 5
4
3
2
1
5
(b) Sunder
(a) Ti
Creative writing
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 38
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
The combined PPC curve is drawn by finding three points and connecting them.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 39
The Gains From Trade, The Gains From Trade, Fig. 2-Fig. 2-6c, p 416c, p 41
Eco
nom
ics
1 2 3 4 5
(c) Combined with trade
4
3
2
1
5
(b) Sunder
(a) Ti
B
C
A
Creative writing
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 40
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
Point A: This is the combined number of economics papers they both can write in a day.
If economics papers are on the Y axis, it is point 0,5.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 41
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
Point B: This is the combined number of creative papers they both can write in a day.
If economics papers are on the Y axis, it is point 5,0.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 42
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
Point C: This is where each is focusing on that activity for which he or she has a comparative advantage.
Sunder writes four creative papers and Ti writes four economics papers.
This is the coordinates 4,4.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 43
The Gains From TradeThe Gains From Trade
The combined PPC is bowed out because of comparative advantage and specialization.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 44
The Division of LaborThe Division of Labor
Markets allow specialization and the division of labor.
They allow individuals to develop their comparative advantages, thereby increasing the production possibilities of society.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 45
Markets, Markets, Specialization, and Specialization, and GrowthGrowth Markets and specialization have led to
growth.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 46
Markets, Markets, Specialization, and Specialization, and GrowthGrowth The growth in per capita income
(constant 1990 dollars) in the past 2 millennia has been astonishing.
This owes largely to the introduction of markets and democracy.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 47
Markets, Markets, Specialization, and Specialization, and GrowthGrowth As people are allowed to compete and
specialize, they get better at what they do, develop new technologies and the market grows ever larger.
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
2 - 48
Growth in the Past Two Growth in the Past Two Millennia Millennia Fig. 2-7, p 42Fig. 2-7, p 42
col17930_0207.eps
$6,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
2000150010005000
Pe
r ca
pit
a in
co
me
(in
19
90 in
tern
ati
on
al d
olla
rs)
© 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited
The Economic The Economic Organization Of Organization Of
SocietySociety
End of Chapter 2End of Chapter 2