1800’s france – guerry wealthiest regions have more property crime, less violent crime ▪...
TRANSCRIPT
1800’s France – Guerry Wealthiest regions have more property
crime, less violent crime▪ Opportunities – more things to steal
Lack of education not related to crime 1800’s France – Quetelet
Men more likely to commit crime▪ Especially poor, unemployed, undereducated
Opportunities important▪ Poor areas had less crime▪ Crime more likely to occur in better off areas, committed by poor▪ Inequality within richer areas might breed resentment
Crime consequence of moral character; virtues break down if poor Problem – reporting
Was crime in poor areas under-reported? Undercounted?
More crime during economic slumps Pratt and Lowenkamp: Homicides 1976-94
negatively associated with economic activity(as one rises, the other falls)
Less crime during economic slumps, or no relationship Great Depression (1928-1940) – Henry and Short
▪ General crime rate did not increase; crimes of violence declined Cho 1970: % below poverty level in 49 largest cities not associated with index
crimes During the 1960’s, as the economy expanded, crime and delinquency increased During the 1990’s, as the economy expanded, crime and delinquency decreased
2011 Census Bureau Report 2010 median income was $49,445, 2.3
percent less than 2009 Poverty rate (less than $22,314 for family of 4)
15.1 percent, up from 14.3 percent in 2009 46.2 million in poverty, up from 43.6 million in 2009, a rise of 5.9
percent Highest rate since 1993, 7.3 percent lower than in 1959, first year rate
was computed 11.7 percent of families in poverty, up from 11.1 percent in 2009 22 percent of children under 18 live in poverty, up from 20.7 percent in
2009 Number without health insurance coverage in 2010 about the same
26.9 percent of households with incomes less than $25,000 have no coverage
8 percent of households with incomes of $75,000 or more have no coverage
http://cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2011/09/13/tsr-sylvester-poverty-in-america.cnn.html
Do economic conditions affect crime?
Study times of economic depression
Look at crime over time, during periods of prosperity and downturns
Does unemployment affect crime?
Does economic inequality affect crime?
Compare crime rates in wealthy and poor areas
Is inequality more important than income? Are poor areas that exist in or near wealthy areas particularly affected?
Issue: economic factors supposedly don’t address individual characteristics
But they influence environmental variables such as nutrition and educational opportunities, which affect human development
Strong positive association between povertyand crime – the more of one, the more of theother
Ehrlich - 1940, 50, 60 – association betweenproperty crime and poor households
1974 - Loftin and Hill’s index of structuralpoverty
▪ Infant mortality, education, income, singleparent families
▪ Strongly correlated with State homicide rates
Lee – 1990 - concentration of poverty is important
Stretsky – The more concentrated the poverty, the more robbery and homicide
Brookings map – Areas where 40% or more of residents are under poverty line
▪ 1990 – 14.1 percent of all poor people lived in these areas; 2000 – 9.1 percent; 2009 – 10.5 percent
http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2011/11/03-poverty-kneebone-nadeau-berube
In St. Louis, homicides fell from 267 in 1993to 113 in 2012, a 60 percent drop
But in North St. Louis, in the abysmally poor27th Ward, murders increased from five in2009 to 17 in 2012
Residents are gripped by fear. Even armedgang members are afraid.
Like problems pervade areas of Chicago and entire other cities, including Detroit, Newark and Camden
Economic problems – the effect of declining property values – have battered city revenues, reducing public services and slashing the numbers of police
NY Times article: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/20/us/in-neighborhoods-like-north-st-louis-gunfire-still-rules-the-night.html
2014 report by the Southern California Associationof Governments (SCAG) Poverty in Southern California increased between
1990 and 2012 Six counties measured: L.A., Orange, San Diego, Riverside, Imperial,
Ventura Number of persons living in poverty increased from 1.9 million in 1990 to
3.2 million in 2012 Poverty increase – 69 percent – was nearly three times higher than the
population increase – 26 percent Eighteen percent of residents and 25 percent of children live in poverty Of those without a high school diploma, one in four lives in poverty Poverty statistics are based on income, not cost of living. So the situation is
likely worse. Poverty less of a problem in Northern California, with a more educated
workforce Link at
http://www.scag.ca.gov/Documents/PovertyGrowth_EconSummit120413.pdf
Hypothesis: Unemployment poverty crime
Adult unemployment effect on delinquency
Glaser and Rice: adult unemployment reduces delinquency, maybe because parents are home
Weatherburn and Lind: delinquency high when adult unemployment high
Youth unemployment effect on delinquency
Several studies report strong positive correlation between delinquency and youth unemployment (go up and down together)
Ihlanfeldt -- More than 20 percent of difference in property crime between black and white neighborhoods caused by lack of job opportunities for black youth
By early 1980’s studies had shown a weak positive relationship between unemploymentand crime
In a 1987 review of 63 studies, Chiricos found asignificant positive relationship between unemployment and crime, especially after 1970 More unemployment, more crime Easier to discover in small units (e.g., cities) because they are more
homogeneous than larger units (e.g., States and regions) Disagreeing, Land, McCall and Cohen found the opposite for homicides
As unemployment increased, homicides decreased Land, Cantor and Russell found a weak negative relationship between
unemployment and crime between 1960-1980 As unemployment increased, crime decreased Said that the positive relationship found by Chiricos is more likely to
be found in smaller units of analysis and for property crime
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6987699n&tag=segementExtraScroller;housing
Compare 1982 – 1992 – 2009/10 Is there a relationship between unemployment and crime? Is it perfect? Does the data generally support the theory? Could the recent uptick in inner-city violence represent a lagged effect
of unemployment on crime?
Unemployment Rate (percent) 1970-2010ages 16 years and over - Bureau of Labor Statistics
2010 – 9.6 pct.
1982 – 9.7 pct.
1992 – 7.5 pct.
Crime rates 1970-2009 - UCR
1991 – 758.2
1980 – 5353.3
1991 – 5140.2
1980 – 596.6 Violent
Property
Are things especially bad in the Northeast because of the decline in manufacturing?
White – 1970 -1990: Decline of manufacturing jobs increased poverty and unemployment increased robberies, burglaries, drug offenses Police Issues : “A Tale of Three Cities”
Shihadeh – 1970 -1990: decline of low-skilled jobs increased poverty increased violence
But – property crime rates may have bottomed out in 2011 Is this the sign of a “lagged”
effect of The Great Recession?
Recent rising violence in major cities National Youth Gang Survey:
Gang violence in large cities on the upswing in the 2000’s. In Chicago and Los Angeles, more than half of killings in 2010 were gang-related.
As of the end of June 2012, New York City property crime down 7%. BUT: violent crime is up, with murders jumping 11%, rapes 13% and shootings 7%
Major differences
Start from drastically different levels
Oakland and Newark higher in 2010 than in 2005
New York City remains low but increased 2009-10
Might the flattening out of the downtrend or the recent increases be a “lagged” effect from the Great Recession?
Relative to locale Relative to who’s measuring Relative to how it’s measured Unemployment is an inexact concept
People not actively seeking work are not counted Count the under-employed, poorly paid dead-end jobs, bad
working conditions How people feel about their jobs isn’t measured
Poverty Crime OR Opportunities Crime
Traditional view: Poverty causes crime
Good economy, low crime; bad economy, high crime
Oppositional view: Crime is driven by opportunities
Good economy greater criminal opportunities more crime
Ploscowe - 1931: support for positive relationship betw. economy & crime
Crime increased during 150-year period when the economy improved
Gurr – 1977: support for positive and negative relationships
Crime “increases” may be due to better police reporting
Different causal processes may be at work in each time frame
▪ 19th. Century - economic activity positively related to crime
▪ 20th. Century – economic distress had no effect, but as total productivity increased, so did crime
It takes time for unemployment to cause crime to increase Unemployed don’t feel the full brunt of being out of work until other
sources of support are exhausted Perhaps there is no corresponding “lag time” for increased opportunities
to commit crime Economic improvements immediately increase criminal opportunities
Cantor and Lang - 1946-1982 - US unemployment rates and crime index Immediate “opportunity” effect and lagged “motivation” effect. As
unemployment increased…▪ Robbery, burglary and theft immediately decreased but then
increased the next year▪ Homicide and auto theft decreased, did not increase the next year▪ No effect on rape and assault
Local conditions are very important
In economically stagnant inner cities, there may be declining amount of legal work and increasing amount of illegal work (e.g., dealing drugs)
Involvement in crime and incarceration may limit opportunities
Alienation and diminished expectations
Low-paying work is stigmatized
Violence substitutes for normal social controls
Once people are socialized into illegal activities, they may continue them
High crime areas have many variables thatmight cause crime Poverty Unemployment Single-parent households High density Poor schools
Many are intercorrelated – related to each other – so their unique individual contributions are hard to measure
Land - the most important determinants of homicide were clustered in one factor (group of intercorrelated variables): “resource deprivation/affluence” This factor includes measures for...
▪ Poverty & income inequality
▪ Percent African-American
▪ Percent children not living with both parents
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7371392n&tag=segementExtraScroller;housing
Poverty: fixed concept – below a fixed level of incomeor material goods
Inequality: relative deprivation
Consistent findings
Economic inequality associated with homicide
Economic inequality associated with violent crime
▪ Firearms violence strongly correlated with inequality after controlling for poverty and access to firearms
Is it a specific kind of inequality (e.g., white/black)?
Messner and Golden (1992): increased inequality between blacks and whites associated with homicide
Other studies report mixed results
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/nyregion/de-blasio-could-help-the-rich-see-the-poor-living-next-door.html
Comparisons between lowest 20%, middle 20% and top 20% of earners
1979 adjusted after-tax income (as % of total income)
Lowest 20 percent: 15,300 (6.8)Middle 20 percent : 44,100 (16.5)Top 20 percent: 101,700 (42.4)
2007 adjusted after-tax income (as % of total income)
Lowest 20 percent: 17,700 (4.9)Middle 20 percent : 55,300 (14.1)Top 20 percent: 198,300 (52.5)
1979-2007 change in adjusted after-tax income Lowest 20 percent of earners up 16%
Middle 20 percent of earners up 25% Top 20 percent of earners up 95%
(source: Congressional Budget Office and Inequality.org)
Economics may have most direct affect on crime within the urban “underclass” – pockets of extreme poverty
Strong association between poverty and violence
Economic inequality is associated with violent crime
Key factor may not be how many poor, but how many wealthy
When only poor people are around, crime may be lower
Direct effect of poverty on crime is mediated by many other variables
High-crime communities have a host of factors – poverty, unemployment, single-parent households, poor schools
These factors may be a more proximate cause of crime than poverty
For example:
Poverty poor schools unemployment broken homes crime