your exams: graded, yes, but i forgot them at home

35
Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home. Did you all get the readings? Yes? 1

Upload: janet

Post on 24-Feb-2016

45 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home. Did you all get the readings? Yes? . Thursday: 12-30, Fares Hall. Fisheries and other Chapter 14. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

1

Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at

home.Did you all get the readings? Yes?

Page 2: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

2

Thursday: 12-30, Fares Hall

Page 3: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

3

Fisheries and otherChapter 14

Page 4: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

4

Biological populations: a class of renewable resources called interactive resources: the size of the resource stock (population) is determined jointly by biological considerations and by actions taken by society Postharvest size of pop – determines the availability of resources

for the future Rate of harvest has intertemporal effects

What is meant by an ‘efficient sustainable level of harvest’? Is efficiency a sufficiently strong criterion to avoid extinction? How well do our institutions fulfill those criteria?

Page 5: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

5

Biological dimension A particular relationship between growth of fish

pop and size of fish population; abstract from environmental influences and age

structure of population Natural equilibrium (Ś): population size that

would persist in the absence of outside influences Stable equilibrium: movements away from this

population level set forces in motion to restore it How? K

Page 6: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

6

Biological dimension Minimum Viable Population (S): level of

population below which growth in population is negative; unstable

Sustainable yield: catch level equals the growth rate of the population As long as the population size remains

constant, growth rate (catch level) will remain constant as well

Maximum sustainable yield population (S*): pop size that yields max growth; largest catch that can be perpetually sustained

Page 7: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-7

Efficient AllocationsBiological Dimension—The Schaefer model The Schaefer model posits an average

relationship between the growth of the fish population and the size of the fish population.

The shape of the graph (Figure 14.1) shows the range of population sizes where population growth leads to population increases and a range where population growth will lead to stock decreases.

Page 8: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-8

Relationship between the Fish Population and

Growth:

Biological Dimension—The Schaefer model

S*: maximum sustainable yield popWhy is G(S*) the MSY for S* pop?

Page 9: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

9

Is the MSY synonymous with efficiency? NO Why? Efficiency: maximizing the net benefit from

the use of resource; need to include the “costs of harvesting” plus benefits

Let’s start by defining the efficient SY w/o discounting

Page 10: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-10

Static Efficient Sustainable Yield

The static-efficient sustainable yield = catch level that, if maintained perpetually, would produce the largest annual net benefit.

*Assumptions of the economic model* are: The price of fish is constant and does not depend on the

amount sold. The marginal cost of a unit of fishing effort is constant. The amount of fish caught per unit of effort expended is

proportional to the size of the fish population. The static-efficient sustainable yield allocation

maximizes the constant net benefit.

Page 11: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-11

Efficient Sustainable Yield for a Fishery

Em = further efforts reduce catch and revenue; corresponds with MSY

Ee = efficient level of effort: MB=MC

Page 12: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-12

• Since marginal costs are assumed constant, total cost is a straight line from the origin. Net benefit is the vertical distance between benefits and costs. Maximum net benefit is at point Ee where the vertical distance is maximized and where the marginal benefit (slope of the total benefit function) equals marginal cost (slope of the total cost function). •The maximum sustainable yield is not equal to the static efficient yield unless the marginal cost of additional effort is zero. The efficient level of effort is less than that necessary to harvest the maximum sustainable yield and thus is associated with higher population sizes. • A change in the marginal cost of effort (due to a change in technology, or a regulation, for example) would cause the total cost curve to rotate. Lower marginal costs would cause a rotation to the right. Higher marginal costs would cause a rotation to the left.

Page 13: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-13

Efficient Sustainable Yield for a Fishery

Ec = infinite r; net benefits equal zero; no value is received from future allocations

Ee = efficient level of effort: MB=MC

Page 14: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-14

Dynamic Efficient Sustainable Yield

The dynamic-efficient sustainable yield incorporates discounting. The dynamic efficient sustainable yield will equal the

static efficient sustainable yield if the discount rate equals zero. Why? Static efficient sustained yield: allocation that

maximizes the identical Higher discount rates mean higher costs (foregone

current income) to the resource owner of maintaining the stock.

With an infinite discount rate, net benefits equal zero. Extinction could occur if the growth rate is lower than

the discount rate and if the costs of extracting the last unit are sufficiently low.

Page 15: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-15

Efficient Sustainable Yield for a Fishery

Ec = infinite r; net benefits equal zero; no value is received from future allocations

Ee = efficient level of effort: MB=MC

Page 16: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

16

Would a dynamically efficient management scheme lead to

extinction of the fishery?

Benefit from extracting the very last unit would have to exceed the cost of extracting that unit (including the costs on future generations)

As long as the population growth rate exceeds the discount rate, this will not be the case. If the growth rate is lower than the discount rate, extinction can occur – if costs of extracting the last unit are sufficiently low

Page 17: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

17

Biomass rate of growth …

Why does the biomass rate of growth have anything to do with whether or not an efficient catch profile leads to extinction?

Rates of growth determine the productivity of conservation efforts

With high rates of growth, future generations can be easily satisfied; when the rate of growth is very low, it takes a large sacrifice by current generations to produce more fish for future generations

Page 18: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

18

Actual fisheries differ from the standard

model… 1) – harvesting marginal costs are typically

not constant; rather they increase as the remaining stock decreases

2) - since prices are not constant, the size of the harvest can – and does - affect prices

Page 19: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-19

Appropriability and Market Solutions

A sole owner of a fishery would have a well-defined property right to the fish and would want to maximize his or her profits. Profit maximization will lead to the static-

efficient sustainable yield. Ocean fisheries are typically open-access

resources. Thus, no single fisherman can keep others from exploiting the fishery.

Page 20: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-20

FIGURE 14.3 Market Allocation in a

Fishery (1 of 2)

Page 21: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-21

FIGURE 14.3 Market Allocation in a

Fishery (2 of 2)

Page 22: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-22

FIGURE 14.3

Marke

t Allocation in

a Fisher

y

Page 23: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-23

Open-access creates two kinds of external costs: Contemporaneous external costs are the costs imposed

on the current generation from overfishing. Too many resources (boats, fishermen, etc.) are committed to fishing.

Intergenerational external costs are the costs imposed on the future generation from the exploitation of the stock today. Overfishing reduces stocks and thus future profits.

Unlimited access creates property rights that are not well-defined.

With free-access, individual fishermen have no incentive to “save” the resource.

Open-access and common-pool resources are not synonymous.

Page 24: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-24

Public Policy Toward Fisheries

Aquaculture is the controlled raising and harvesting of fish. Fish farming involves cultivating fish over their lifetime. Fish ranching involves holding fish in captivity for the first

few years of their lives.

Page 25: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-25

FIGURE 14.4 Global Capture and Aquaculture

Production

Page 26: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-26

FIGURE 14.5 Chinese Capture and Aquaculture

Production

Page 27: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-27

FIGURE 14.6 China’s Rising Share of

Aquaculture

Page 28: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-28

Raising the real cost of fishing through regulation is another policy option. Raising the marginal cost of effort results in a

lower harvest and higher stock sizes. While the policies may result in an efficient

catch, they are inefficient because the efficient level of catch is not caught at the lowest possible cost.

Technological innovations have lowered the cost of fishing, offsetting the increases imposed by regulations.

Page 29: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-29

FIGURE 14.7 Effect of Regulation

Page 30: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-30

Taxes also raise the real cost of fishing, but do so in an efficient manner. Unlike regulations, the tax can lead to the

static-efficient sustainable yield allocation because the tax revenues represent transfer costs and not real-resource costs.

Transfer costs involve the transfer of resources from one part of society to another.

For the individual fisherman, however, a tax still represents an increase in costs.

Page 31: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-31

Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs) An efficient quota system will have the

following characteristics: The quotas entitle the holder to catch a

specified volume of a specified type of fish. The total amount of fish authorized by the

quotas should be equal to the efficient catch level for that fishery.

The quotas should be freely transferable among fishermen.

Page 32: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-32

TABLE 14.1 Countries with Individual

Transferable Quota Systems

Page 33: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-33

Subsidies and Buy Backs One of management options to reduce

overcapacity. Payments used to buy out excess fishing

capacity are useful subsidies, but if additional capacity seeps in over time, they are not as effective as other management measures.

Page 34: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-34

Marine protected areas and marine reserves are areas that prohibit harvesting and are protected from other threats such as pollution. Marine protected areas are designated ocean

areas within which human activity is restricted. Marine reserves protect individual species by

preventing harvests within the reserve boundaries.

Page 35: Your exams: graded, yes, but I forgot them at home

14-35

The 200-Mile Limit The 200-Mile Exclusion Zone is an

international policy solution that has been implemented. Countries bordering the sea now have

ownership rights that extend 200 miles offshore. Within the 200-mile limit, the countries have exclusive jurisdiction.

This ruling protects coastal fisheries, but not the open ocean.