write right an overview of academic writing “read, read, read. write, write write.” patrick...

Download Write Right An Overview of Academic Writing “Read, read, read. Write, write write.” Patrick White

Post on 20-Jan-2016




0 download

Embed Size (px)


  • Write RightAn Overview of Academic Writing

    Read, read, read. Write, write write.Patrick White

  • What do you expect from this presentation?

    Is WRITING important to your growth as a scientist and professional?

    Where do you place WRITING as a skill on a scale of 1 to 5 and why?

  • The 5 Steps Academic WritingThe GermThe Map Critical Thinking & Logic in ArgumentGrammar & Stylistic ElementsRevision & Rewriting

  • Incubating the Germ

    Guess what? Which is the challenge.

    Prove it! Which you will do through research. Then the last challenge...

    So what?Was all that work worth it? Are you adding something new to your area of knowledge?

  • Stasis TheoryIt is a theory which writers use in investigation and when trying to determine a question.

    The Facts (Conjecture)The Meaning or Nature of the Issue (Definition)The Seriousness of the Issue (Quality)The Plan of Action (Policy)

  • The InquiryFACTWhat are the facts?Did something happen?Is there a problem or issue?How did it begin and what are its causes?What changed to create the problem?Can the facts be changed?DEFINITION What is the nature of the problem?What kind of a problem is it?To what larger class of things or events does it belong?What are its parts and how are they connected?

  • AndQUALITYIs it a good thing or a bad thing?How serious is the problem or issue?Whom might it affect?What happens if you do nothing?What are the costs?POLICYShould action be taken?Who all should be involved?What should be done about the problem?What needs to happen to solve the problem?

  • Using The Stasis TheoryShould we take action to stop Global Warming?Fact or Conjecture (Does it exist? Did it happen?)Is climate on Earth changing? If so, is it getting warm, cold or both? How and when did these changes begin? What factors are causing these changes? Are humans responsible? Or is it natural? Can these changes be slowed down or stopped? Definition or Nature (How can the event be defined?) Are these climatic changes really global warming or are they something else? Then how should global warming be defined? What is its connection with other aspects of climate change? How does it fit into the theory of the ice age which was due to climate change too? What are the different parts of the process of climate change?

  • Using The Stasis TheoryShould we take action to stop Global Warming?Seriousness & Quality (What is the character of the act?)Is climate change detrimental? Is it right to try and stop it? Economic growth versus energy conservation? Which is important, short-term economic prosperity or long-term environmental stability? Policy or Plan of Action (What should be done?)Should we attempt to stop climate change? What are the implications if we do nothing? Should we reduce greenhouse gases? Should we conserve energy? Is nuclear power an option? Will these steps reduce global warming? Will these actions lead to other problems?

  • Brainstorming Make a Mind Tree with the Issue or Problem in the center and branches radiating outwards. Ask why you are a writing this essay or paperDiagram your major pointsWrite down everything the good & bad pointsDon't censorAnticipate the questions the reader would askAsk the Journalistic questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? So What?

  • The Thesis StatementAnalytical , Expository or Argumentative SpecificShould describe only what you plan to discuss in your paper DebatableEx: Pollution is bad for the environment. Narrow Ex: Drug use is detrimental to society.

  • What is Critical Thinking?

    An unexpected insight or original thoughtAn acute discrimination of factsTo be able to differentiate between theory and practiceThe capability to combine both a logical and original opinion

  • How to Think Critically?Question the question itself.Are terms defined and by what criteria? How reliable is the source?How relevant is the point in discussion?Are claims supported by evidence? Is there consistency in an argument?What is left unexplained in the argument?Can the claims be verified and how?Is the writer biased in any way?Don't accept published material at face value.Always double check references for yourself .

  • Logic in ArgumentsSlippery SlopeEx: If we ban all luxury cars with low mileage because they are bad for the environment, then the government will eventually ban all cars, therefore we should not ban luxury cars.Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (After this, therefore because of this)Ex: I ate out yesterday and I am sick, so the food must have made me sick. Genetic Fallacy Ex: The TATA Nano will be a bad car because it displaced and caused injustice to X number of farmers in Singur.

  • Bagging the ClaimEx: Filthy and polluting industries should be banned. Either/Or Ex: We can either stop using cars or destroy the world. Ad HominemEx: The paper in question is written by a professor at JNU, so it is bound to have leftist and socialistic traits. Ad PopulumEx: If you are a true Indian you will support the moral policing practiced by certain factions in the country. Red HerringEx: The level of mercury in seafood may be unsafe, but what will the fishermen do to support their families?

  • Grammar & Stylistic Elements Succinctness Use specific words. Avoid vagueness. The speaker spoke about several of the merits of writing without using small and redundant words in his speech. (19)The speaker elucidated concise writing in his speech. (8) Vivek believed but could not confirm that Ritika had feelings of affection for him. (14)Vivek assumed that Ritika adored him. (6)

  • Question every WordMany have made the wise observation that when a stone is in motion rolling down a hill or incline that, that stone is not likely to be covered all over with the kind of thick green moss that grows on stationary unmoving things and becomes a nuisance and suggests that those things haven't moved in a long time and probably won't move anytime soon. (67)A rolling stone gathers no moss. (6)Combine SentencesThis lecture talks about writing. It explains good writing. It shows ways in which we can improve our writing. Some parts were useful. Other parts were not. (27)This lecture is about good writing and suggests both useful and not so useful aspects to improve this skill. (19)

  • Eliminating Words Eliminate Determiners & Modifiers kind of, sort of, type of, really, basically, actually, generallyRemove Redundant Pairs past memories, each individual, end result, free gift, true facts, terrible tragedy, past history, very uniqueRemove Redundant CategoriesLarge in size, of a bright color, round in shape, of an uncertain condition, extreme in degree, in a confused state

  • Changing Awkward Phrases Convert Phrases into Single Words or AdjectivesThe students with ambition. The ambitious students. The department showing the best performance. The best performing department. Convert 'That', 'Who' and 'Which' Clauses into PhrasesThe report which was released recently. The recently released report. The system that is most efficient and accurate.The most efficient and accurate system.

  • Change Passive Sentences into Active VoiceAn experiment was done by Ramesh. Ramesh did an experiment. Your figures were checked by the research department. The research department checked your figures.

  • Revision & RewritingMacro EditingStructure of the essay/thesis/paperThe manuscripts relevance to the original question and your discussionsDo the introduction and conclusion correlate Logic Irrelevant discussionsAre paragraphs linked correctly Micro EditingGrammar Spelling Punctuation Referencing

  • Sources Easy Writer, Stephen McLarenScience and Technical Writing, Philip RubensOnline Writing Lab at Purdue (OWL at Purdue)Stasis Theory: Finding Common Ground and Asking Pertinent Questions, John R. Edlund

    A useful resource : http://www.thefreedictionary.com/