withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in mild hypertension

5
WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS I N MILD HYPERTENSION Mats Danielson, M.D., Department of Medicine I, Sodersjukhuset, 100 64 Stockholm,Sweden. Marianne Lundback M.D. High blood pressure almost without exception has to be treated by means of anti- hypertensive drugs. In the majority of cases the treatment will be of life-long duration. Therefore, in newly discovered hypertension, the question often arises whether the treatment initiated has to be kept up indefinitely. This problem has its relevancy not only for the patient, but also for doctors engaged in clinical research: Is it ethical to discontinue an antihypertensive treatment once initiated? And - if cross-over technique is applied - for how long a period has the patient to be deprived of the active substance in order for the result not to be affected by a carry-over effect? The effect of discontinuing treatment in hypertensive patients has been previous- l y analyzed in a couple of studies. The results have been varying. Page and Dustan (1962) initially reported that 9 of 27 (33%) patients in whom treatment had been discontinued remained essentially normotensive without drug therapy for periods varying from six months to five years of observation. In a later review of 65 patients, however, the same authors found that diastolic hypertension reappearedin a l l but two patients (3%), (Dustan et a1 1968). Perry et a1 (1966) studied 316 patients with an initial diastolic pressure of >/ 110 mm Hg at rest in hospital, a l l of whom had been treated for more than 6 years. Sixteen of those (5%) could abstain from antihypertensive treatment during a mean observation time of 6 years. Thurm and Smith (1967) discontinued antihypertensive drugs in 69 patients. They found that 16 (231) remained normotensive for periods o f 10 t o 42 months a f t e r discontinuing treatment. The VA Cooperative Study Group (1975) in their research, including the use of placebo, found that 9 patients (15%) remained normotensive during an observation time of 72 weeks after disbontinuing active treatment, the population being 60 patients of 53 years age (mean), a l l o f whom had been treated for two years or more with hydrochlorothiazide, reserpine and hydralazine. Boyle et a1 (1979) investigated the effect of withholding treatment from a group of patients with mild hypertension in a l l of whom the hypertension had been well controlled by thiazide diuretics only. They found that eighteen of twenty patients were returned to treatment after 1 t o 132 weeks (mean 31 weeks). 127

Upload: mats-danielson

Post on 26-Sep-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN MILD HYPERTENSION

WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS I N MILD HYPERTENSION

Mats Danielson, M.D.,

Department o f Medicine I, Sodersjukhuset, 100 64 Stockholm,Sweden.

Marianne Lundback M.D.

High b lood pressure almost w i thou t except ion has t o be t r e a t e d by means of a n t i -

hypertensive drugs. I n t h e m a j o r i t y o f cases t h e t rea tment w i l l be o f l i f e - l o n g

dura t ion . Therefore, i n newly discovered hypertension, t h e ques t i on o f t e n a r i s e s

whether the t reatment i n i t i a t e d has t o be kept up i n d e f i n i t e l y .

This problem has i t s relevancy n o t on l y f o r t h e p a t i e n t , b u t a l s o for doctors

engaged i n c l i n i c a l research: Is i t e t h i c a l t o d i scon t inue an an t i hype r tens i ve

t reatment once i n i t i a t e d ? And - i f cross-over technique i s a p p l i e d - f o r how long

a pe r iod has t h e p a t i e n t t o be depr ived o f t he a c t i v e substance i n order fo r t he

r e s u l t no t t o be a f f e c t e d by a carry-over e f f e c t ?

The e f f e c t o f d i scon t inu ing treatment i n hyper tens ive p a t i e n t s has been prev ious-

l y analyzed i n a couple o f s tud ies . The r e s u l t s have been varying. Page and Dustan

(1962) i n i t i a l l y repo r ted t h a t 9 of 27 (33%) p a t i e n t s i n whom t rea tment had been

discont inued remained e s s e n t i a l l y normotensive w i thou t drug therapy f o r pe r iods

vary ing from s i x months t o f i v e years o f observat ion. I n a l a t e r rev iew o f 65

pa t i en ts , however, t he same authors found t h a t d i a s t o l i c hyper tens ion reappearedin

a l l bu t two p a t i e n t s (3%), (Dustan e t a 1 1968).

Perry e t a1 (1966) s tud ied 316 p a t i e n t s wi th an i n i t i a l d i a s t o l i c p ressure o f

>/ 110 mm Hg a t r e s t i n h o s p i t a l , a l l o f whom had been t r e a t e d fo r more than 6

years. S ix teen o f those ( 5 % ) cou ld a b s t a i n from an t ihyper tens i ve t reatment during

a mean observa t ion t ime o f 6 years.

Thurm and S m i t h (1967) d iscont inued an t i hyper tens i ve drugs i n 69 p a t i e n t s . They

found t h a t 16 (231) remained normotensive f o r pe r iods o f 10 t o 42 months a f t e r

d i scon t inu ing treatment.

The VA Cooperative Study Group (1975) i n t h e i r research, i n c l u d i n g t h e use o f

placebo, found t h a t 9 p a t i e n t s (15%) remained normotensive d u r i n g an observat ion

t ime o f 72 weeks a f t e r d i sbon t inu ing a c t i v e t reatment, t h e p o p u l a t i o n be ing 60

p a t i e n t s o f 53 years age (mean), a l l o f whom had been t r e a t e d fo r two years or

more with hydroch lo ro th iaz ide , rese rp ine and hydra laz ine .

Boyle e t a1 (1979) i n v e s t i g a t e d the e f f e c t o f w i thho ld ing t rea tment from a group

o f p a t i e n t s w i t h m i l d hypertension i n a l l o f whom t h e hyper tens ion had been w e l l

c o n t r o l l e d by t h i a z i d e d i u r e t i c s only. They found t h a t e igh teen o f twenty pat ients

were re tu rned t o t reatment a f t e r 1 t o 132 weeks (mean 31 weeks).

127

Page 2: WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN MILD HYPERTENSION

Totterman and E i s a l o (1980) repor ted , i n a p r e l i m i n a r y account, t h a t 11,5L o f 122

p a t i e n t s aged 50 were a b l e t o manage w i thou t t reatment, and so d i d 24,676 o f s i x t y -

n ine , 65 years o l d p a t i e n t s (observa t ion t i m e 9 months).

Our purpose i s t o study t h e e f f e c t o f d i s c o n t i n u i n g t rea tment i n a f a i r l y homo-

genous popu la t i on o f p a t i e n t s s u f f e r i n g from es tab l i shed, m i l d and w e l l t r e a t e d

hypertension. Th is r e p o r t accounts f o r t h e r e s u l t s a f t e r a n obse rva t i on t ime o f

3 - 24 months.

M a t e r i a l and methods

The study i nc ludes 47 p a t i e n t s (21 men, 26 women), mean age 42 2 11 YearS,suffer-

i n g from e s s e n t i a l hyper tens ion stage WHO I. T h i r t y t h r e e p a t i e n t s conf i rmed t h e

prevalence o f hyper tens ion i n a t l e a s t one o f t h e i r paren ts . The i n i t i a l blood-

p ressure was 178/118 (aye-group < 40 years, n=20'), 187/115 (40 - 60 years, n=25)

and 188/110 mm Hg (> 60 years, n=2) r e s p e c t i v e l y . The known mean d u r a t i o n o f

hypertension was 4,4 years (range 1 - 20 years). Twentythree p a t i e n t s had another

r i s k f a c t o r besides hypertension: 20 were smokers, 2 had hyper l i p idemia and one

had diabetes m e l l i t u s t r e a t e d with i n s u l i n e .

The c r i t e r i a f o r i n c l u s i o n i n the s tudy were:

1) es tab l i shed hyper tens ion (repeated pressure r e g i s t r a t i o n s be fo re t rea tment ) .

2 ) d u r a t i o n o f hyper tens ion n o t l e s s than 1 year, and 3 ) w e l l c o n t r o l l e d hyper-

t ens ion f o r a t l e a s t 6 months.

Before t h e study the p a t i e n t s were t r e a t e d with s a l u r e t i c s (hyd roch lo ro th iaz ide

50 mg every second day up t o 50 mg d a i l y ) n=9,beta-blockers ( p i n d o l o l 5 - 15 mg

d a i l y or a t e n o l o l 50 - 100 mg d a i l y ) n=33, s a l u r e t i c s p l u s a beta-blocker n = 4 , o r a beta-blocker p l u s hyd ra laz in n=l. The mean l e v e l o f s y s t o l i c and d i a s t o l i c

pressure a t t h e two l a s t r e g i s t r a t i o n s be fo re t h e beg inn ing o f t h e s tudy was

131/84 ( < 40 years), 137/88 (40 - 60 years) and 145/90 (> 60 years) mm Hg.

The treatment was d iscont inued prompt ly and t h e p a t i e n t s were fo l l owed upp every

t h i r d month du r ing t h e f i r s t year, and every f o r t h month d u r i n g t h e second.

Whenever an occasional s y s t o l i c or d i a s t o l i c hyper tens ion was r e g i s t e r e d a con-

t r o l measurement was performed a f t e r one month. The l i m i t values f o r hyperten-

s i o n were de f i ned w i t h due cons ide ra t i on t o age and prevalence o f a d d i t i o n a l

r i s k f a c t o r s (Table I ) .

A l l r e g i s t r a t i o n s were made with a mercury sphygmo-manometer , t h e p a t i e n t s

having been a t r e s t i n sup ine p o s i t i o n f o r 10 minutes.

128

Page 3: WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN MILD HYPERTENSION

Table I. D e f i n i t i o n s o f hypertension.

Age 9 Number o f Without o ther With o the r

years pa t i ents r i s k f a c t o r r i s k f a c t o r

~~

< 40 20 160/100 155/95

40 - 60 25 170/105 165/100

> 60 2 180/110 175/105

Resul ts

The number o f p a t i e n t s observed du r ing 0 - 2 years i s represented i n F ig . 1. Out

o f 47 p a t i e n t s 18 have so f a r resumed ant i -hyper tens ive t reatment. One p a t i e n t

d iscont inued t h e fol low-up due t o headache, appear ing on d i s c o n t i n u i n g treatment

with a beta-blocker. Another p a t i e n t had t o resume t rea tment with s a l u r e t i c s due

t o reappearence of oedema. I n the o ther 16 p a t i e n t s s y s t o l i c (n=3), d i a s t o l i c

(n=6) or s y s t o - d i a s t o l i c (n=7) hypertension was reg i s te red . I n 5 o f t h e p a t i e n t s

t h e e leva t i on appeared a f t e r 3 months, i n another 6 p a t i e n t s a f t e r 6 months and

i n the remaining cases a f t e r 9 months. None o f t h e p a t i e n t s fo l l owed f o r 1 year

or more has recovered h i s hypertension.

n

w-

.w -

20 -

10 -

0 N I HT

LL 2 years

Figure 1. Number o f normotensive (NT) and hyper tens ive (HT) p a t i e n t s .

With due r e s e r v a t i o n f o r t h e f a c t t h a t t h e number o f p a t i e n t s under observa t ion decreases as t h e t ime o f observa t ion increases i t appears t h a t t h e s y s t o l i c and d i a s t o l i c reduc t i on o f p ressure i s f a i r l y constant du r ing t h e f i r s t 2 years. (Fig. 2 ) . I n a comparision a f t e r one year between the p a t i e n t s who recovered t h e i r hyper- tens ion (n=16) and t h o s e e s t i l l be ing normotensive (n=22) no d i f f e r e n c e was esta- b l i shed as t o t h e prevalence o f hypertension i n any o f t he parents , age, sex, du ra t i on o f hypertension, c o e x i s t i n g r i s k f a c t o r s or e f f e c t o f t reatment. There was, however, among t h e p a t i e n t s recover ing t h e i r hyper tens ion a h igher i n i t i a l (un t rea ted) d i a s t o l i c b lood pressure, as compared t o the normotensive ones, 1 8 6 / E and 179/= mm Hq, respec t i ve l y .

129

Page 4: WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN MILD HYPERTENSION

0 i i years n=47 39 31 23 22 17 15 I0

Figure 2. Sys to l i c (-1 and d i a s t o l i c ( - - -1 blood pressure reduct ion as compared t o the i n d i v i d u a l d e f i n i t i o n s o f hypertension i n normotensive pat ients . M 2 S.D., n number o f pat ients .

Discussion

These p re l im ia ry r e s u l t s from an on-going study suggest t h a t i t i s poss ib le t o

discont inue the treatment o f hypertension.

A l l o f t he pa t i en ts had a m i l d hypertension. On t h e other hand they i n i t i a l l y

suf fered from a marked e levat ion o f t h e blood pressure. As could be seen from

the r e s u l t s the resumption o f treatment was caused not on ly by the e levat ion of

pressure, but by other symptoms as headache and oedema as wel l . The m a j o r i t y o f

pa t i en ts discont inuing the follow-up, however, became hypertensive. The re- occurrences were evenly d i s t r i b u t e d dur ing t h e f i r s t 9 months. A f te r t h a t none

of the pa t i en ts so f a r observed recovered t h e i r hypertension.

The d e f i n i t i o n s o f hypertension used are founded on the p r e v a i l i n g opin ion i n

Sweden. However, the c r i t e r i a o f hypertension are subject t o discussion and t h e

p o s s i b i l i t y ex i s t s t h a t the l i m i t values should be set- lower. This i s why i t has

t o be stressed, i n studies l i k e t h i s , t h a t you only r e g i s t e r whether t h e p a t i e n t

has surpassed a c e r t a i n l i m i t of pressure or not. Thus there are pa t i en ts who

have a very low pressure dur ing treatment, regain ing a l i m i t - v a l u e or j u s t under-

neath when l e f t untreated, These pa t i en ts would no t be c l a s s i f i e d as hypertensivs

according t o the present d e f i n i t i o n . The e levat ion o f pressure a f t e r d iscont inu ing

treatment could, however, be considerable, e n t a i l i n g an increased r i s k o f cardio-

vascular disease.

It has been reported t h a t a h igh i n i t i a l blood pressure i s co r re la ted t o re lapse

o f hypertension a f t e r an attempt t o d iscont inue ant ihypertensive treatment ( T h w

and Smith 1967, Dustan e t a1 1968). Young pa t ien ts seem t o recover t h e i r hyper-

tension more r a p i d l y as compared t o o lder ones. ( V A Cooperative Study Group,1975).

130

Page 5: WITHDRAWAL OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS IN MILD HYPERTENSION

This study a l s o suggests the s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h e i n i t i a l p ressure when judq in r j

t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f d i scon t inu ing an t i hype r tens i ve t reatment. Other f a c t o r s l i k e

age, sex, du ra t i on o f hypertension seem t o have no importance.

To conclude: Our p r e l i m i n a r y f i nd ings i n t h i s ongoing s tudy suggest t he p o s s i b i -

l i t y o f making i n t e r r u p t i o n s i n or even, i n some cases, t he d i s c o n t i n u a t i o n o f

t h e an t ihyper tens ive therapy i n es tab l i shed b u t w e l l t r e a t e d m i l d hypertension.

References

Boyle R.M., P r i c e M.L., Hamil ton M.: Thiazide withdrawal i n hypertension. J Royal C o l l Phys. 13: 172-173, 1979

Dustan H.P., Page I.H., Taraz i R.C., F r o h l i c h E.D.: A r t e r i a l pressure responses t o d i scon t iun ing an t i hype r tens i ve drugs. C i r c u l a t i o n 37: 370-379. 1968.

Page I.H., Dustan H.P.: Persistence o f normal b lood pressure a f t e r d i scon t inu ing t rea tment i n hyperterisj.vc, p a t i e n t s . C i r c u l a t i o n 25: 433-436, 1962.

Perry H.M., Schroeder H.A., Catanzaro F.J., Moore-Jones D., Camel G.: Studies on the c o n t r o l o f hypertension. VIII. M o r t a l i t y , m o r b i d i t y and remissions du r ing t e l v e years o f i n t e n s i v e therapy. C i r c u l a t i o n 33: 950-972, 1966.

Thurm R.H., Smith W.M.: On r e s e t t i n g o f "barostats" i n hyper tens ive p a t i e n t s . JAMA 201: 301-304, 1967.

Totterman K.J., E i sa lo A.: P o s s i b i l i t y o f reduc t i on o f an t i hype r tens i ve therapy i n hypertension. Abs t rac t , Seventh s c i e n t i f i c meeting o f t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l Soc ie ty o f Hypertension, New Orleans 1980, p. 136.

Veterans Admin i s t ra t i on Cooperative Study Group on Ant ihyper tens ive Agents: Return o f e levated b lood pressure a f t e r wi thdrawal o f an t i hype r tens i ve drugs. C i r c u l a t i o n 51: 1107-1113, 1975.

131