welcome to foothill grape day 2010!cecentralsierra.ucanr.org/files/77692.pdf · 2006 11 ti 2004:...
TRANSCRIPT
Welcome to Foothill Grape Day 2010!
Special Thanks To
El Dorado Grape Growers AssociationGreg BiaochhiSheila BushBob ClarkDon LaheyDoug LeiszMargaret and Bill LeitzJim SauberBob Witters
Sogno Wineryg y
Donating wineries, Bagatelle Catering, Dedrick’s Cheese, Beyond Baked
UCCE staff: ****Robin Cleveland***, Nancy Starr
UC County Director Scott Oneto
All of our speakers!
Please RECYCLE the plastic water b ttl ( t f d i th bi l )bottles (water found in the big cooler).
No recycling in trash please!!
Use the pen to write your name on your
bottle!
For your calendar• AWGGA “Farming for Excellence” Series begins with Stan Grant, Progressive Viticulture, speaking b t ti t iti l tabout a pro‐active nutritional management program.
N Th d J 10 @ 3 Sh d hNext Thursday, June 10 @ 3 p.m. Shenandoah Schoolhouse.
d d bl ’ l• Wednesday, August 4: Doug Gubler’s annual Powdery Mildew field day @ Herzog Ranch in Cl k b 95 t i l t t d F d L hClarksburg. 95 materials tested. Free and Lunch included. Must RSVP.
What’s happening locally: WeatherAnnual Precipitation Totals 2003-May2010
Month03-04 Inches
04-05 Inches
05-06 Inches
06-07 Inches
07-08 Inches
08-09 Inches
09-10 Inches
Camino CIMIS station data
Month Inches Inches Inches Inches Inches Inches Inches July 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 August 0.35 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 September 0 04 0 83 0 63 0 00 0 71 0 00 0 2September 0.04 0.83 0.63 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.2 October 0.04 6.61 0.75 0.67 2.20 0.87 2.28 November 0.83 4.49 2.72 3.43 1.26 1.57 1.73 December 8 86 0 00 20 63 6 73 6 50 4 84 5 35December 8.86 0.00 20.63 6.73 6.50 4.84 5.35 January 4.21 0.28 7.20 2.09 8.46 4.09 8.19 February 8.58 0.59 5.31 9.92 4.53 9.09 5.47 March 1 77 1 03 14 21 1 77 1 02 5 79 4 41March 1.77 1.03 14.21 1.77 1.02 5.79 4.41 April 0.55 1.23 11.61 3.15 0.31 2.13 7.40 May 0.16 4.65 1.18 0.75 0.00 4.33 4.61 J 0 04 2 28 0 00 0 04 0 00 0 04June 0.04 2.28 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.04Totals 25.43 21.99 64.28 28.55 24.99 32.75 39.64 Average 3.91 3.38 9.89 4.39 3.84 5.04
Average Max Air Temp, Average Min Air Temp, Average Air Temp (all ˚F) and Total Precipitation (in.) for the month of May 1990-2010.
C i CIMIS t ti d tCamino CIMIS station data.Avg Max Air Tmp(F) Avg Min Air Tmp(F)
Avg Air Tmp(F) Tot Precip(in)
70
80
90
16
18
20Avg Air Tmp(F) Tot Precip(in)
50
60
70
10
12
14
16
˚F ip (i
n)
20
30
40
6
8
10
Tmp.
Prec
i
0
10
20
0
2
4
May
-90
May
-92
May
-94
May
-96
May
-98
May
-00
May
-02
May
-04
May
-06
May
-08
May
-10
Foothill Grape Day 2010: Biology and management of Gill’s mealybug,Biology and management of Gill s mealybug,
Ferrisia gilli (Gullan)
Lynn Wunderlich*, Monica Cooper, and Kent Daane*UC Cooperative Extension-El Dorado and Amador Counties,
UC Cooperative Extension-Napa CountyUC B k l /K A C tUC Berkeley/Kearney Ag. Center
funded by the American Vineyard Foundation and Viticulture Consortium West
Gill’s mealybug, Ferrisia gilli, a pest of pistachio, almond, and… grapes.
Gill’s mealybug on pistachio Gill’s mealybug on grapesGill’s mealybug on pistachio
1990s: first noticed; confused with striped mealybug, F. virgata.
Gill’s mealybug on grapes
2003: first record in EDC backyard grapes;
2003: 200 acres in Tulare; Gullan et.al. publish description.
2005: 3,000 acres across 8 counties; 2006 11 ti
2004: commercial vineyard, eradication attempted.
2007: at least 12 vineyards (180 )2006: 11 counties (180 acres)
2009: at least 300 acres
Currently a “B” rated pestCurrently a “B” rated pest.
Gill’s mealybug found on y gEscalonia landscape plants
in EDH
Grape mealybug, Pseudococcus maritimus.
Adult female Gill’s mealybug, Ferrisia illi bearing li e cra lersgilli, bearing live crawlers.
Grape mealybug egg sac.
Vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus.Adult male Gill’s mealybug
Grapevine Leafroll Associated Viruses d th i k tand their known vectors
GLRaVGLRaV--1: Grape mealybug, soft scale1: Grape mealybug, soft scale**GLR V**GLR V 22**GLRaV**GLRaV--22**GLRaV**GLRaV--2 RG2 RG**GLRaV**GLRaV--3:Longtailed mealybug, Citrus mealybug, Obscure mealybug, Grape 3:Longtailed mealybug, Citrus mealybug, Obscure mealybug, Grape
l b ft ll b ft lmealybug, soft scalemealybug, soft scaleGLRaVGLRaV--44**GLRaV**GLRaV--5: Longtailed mealybug, Grape Mealybug5: Longtailed mealybug, Grape MealybugGLR VGLR V 66GLRaVGLRaV--66GLRaVGLRaV--77GLRaVGLRaV--99** fi d i h f hill** fi d i h f hill** confirmed present in the foothills ** confirmed present in the foothills
We still do not know if Gill’s mealybug transmits LR, but seems We still do not know if Gill’s mealybug transmits LR, but seems likely.likely.
Gill’s mealybug studies on wine grapes in El Dorado County CA (2008-present)El Dorado County, CA. (2008-present).
1. Seasonal phenology.p gyWhen is the crawler stage present and most susceptible to
sprays?
2. Crop damage.How serious of a potential pest is this?
3. Natural enemies.Any parasitoids? How abundant?Any parasitoids? How abundant?
4. Insecticide controls.How well will pesticides work to manage this insect?
Seasonal phenology: nondestructive sampling for Gill’s mealybug in untreated vines.
Trunk base Trunk Armpit/under cordonTrunk base Trunk Armpit/under cordon
Old Spur New Spur Leaves Clusters
Percent of total number of Gill’s mealybugs, by vine section, found on ten untreated vines (Vineyard “B”), 2008-2009.
nd 100%
Trunk base Trunk Armpit Old Spur New Spur Leaves Cluster
bugs
foun
nes
80%
ll’s m
ealy
bre
ated
vin
60%
f tot
al G
iler
10
untr
20%
40%
Perc
ent o
f pe
0%
20%
P
5/29/0
86/2
6/08
7/24/0
88/1
9/08
9/16/0
812
/05/08
02/21
/0904
/11/09
05/13
/0906
/09/09
07/09
/0908
/11/09
09/21
/0910
/29/09
Mean number of Gill’s mealybugs, by stage, per ten untreated vines (Vineyard “B”) 2008-2009
90
100
Adults Adults with crawler/sac Nymphsr 10
untreated vines (Vineyard B ), 2008-2009.
60
70
80y p
lybu
gs p
erin
es
1st gen
40
50
60
Gill
’s m
eal
ntre
ated
vi
2nd gen
2nd gen
20
30
0
Mea
n #
of G un
overwinter
1st gen
0
10
M g
May-08
Jul-08
Sep-08
Nov-08
Jan-09
Mar-09
May-09
Jul-09
Sep-09
Nov-09
Jan-10
Cluster Damage Rating
Cluster rating0 = no damage1 = honeydew and/or
0 1
1 honeydew and/or less than 10 mealybugs.
2 = more than 10 mealybugsmealybugs.3 = unmarketable
2 3
Cluster ratings at harvest in insecticide treated and untreated blocks (2008 and 2009).
100%a a a a b a b a bba
cate
gory
80%
3d in
eac
h c
40%
60% 321te
rs r
ated
20%
40%0
ge o
f clu
st
0%
20%
Perc
enta
g
0%I U U I U I U I U I UVineyard D Vineyard C Vineyard B
P
Insecticide trials in 20092 separate vineyard field trials with 5-6 replicates, RBD
Grower applied treatments timed for 1st gen. crawler stageCalibrated air blast sprayers:100 gal/ac (@ 3.2 mph, 125 gal/ac @ 2.6 mph
•Movento (Spirotetramat) @ 8 oz (full rate) w/ 0.125% Syl-tac
A l d (B f i ) /0 25% R 11 li d i•Applaud (Buprofezin) w/0.25% R-11, applied one time@ 12 oz.(full rate) or @ 8 oz
•Assail (Acetamiprid) @ 1.1oz w/ 0.125% Syl-tac (1 trial only)
•UntreatedUntreated
Evaluated with whole vine ratings, basal leaf counts, and/or timed counts
Cluster ratings prior to harvest, Chi-square test w/ pairwise comparison
Percent of clusters in each rating category by treatment, Vineyard “N”, 2009.
2.0
20.611.3
100%a b c
21.3
5.3
13.980% Rating
Category
98.0 32.2
60% 321
62.0
40%10
33.3
0%
20%
0%Applaud-8 oz Movento-8oz Untreated
Chi-Square F=148.19, DF=6, P<0.001 (all); P< 0.0167 (pairwise comparison)
Percent of clusters in each rating category by treatment, Vineyard “L” 2009.
15 44.2
0.41.7 7.91.72.1100%
tego
rya b ca
19.615.4
27.5
9.6
80%
n ea
ch c
at
Rating Category
99.6
60% 321rs
rat
ed in
74.281.3
55.0
20%
40%10
of c
lust
er
0%
20%
erce
ntag
e
0%Applaud-12oz Movento-8oz Assail-1.1oz UntreatedPe
Contingency table analysis (pairwise separation P < 0.007)
Natural enemiesNatural enemies• Many generalist N.E. observed-numbers too low to impact
Gill’s populationGill s population.• Mummies (parasitized Gill’s MB) collected from all sites-
but mostly from untreated areas and numbers are low.• Acerophagus identified so far.
Acerophagus notativentrisAnagyrus pseudococci Acerophagus notativentrisAnagyrus pseudococciMealybug “mummy”
Experiments planned for 20101. Repeat insecticide experiment targeting crawler stage:
Untreated control
Applaud @ 12 oz., applied twice
Assail @ 1 1 ozAssail @ 1.1 oz
Clutch (Clothianidin) in place of Movento
2. “Organic” option trial; applied earlier, targeting overwintering instars on shoots:
Untreated control (+ mildew material)
JMS Organic Stylet Oil (97.1% paraffinic oil) @ 2% (+ mildew material)
Ecotech (10% rosemary oil, 2% peppermint oil) @0.5% (+ mildew material)
treatments repeated 7 14 days 2 3 timestreatments repeated 7-14 days, 2-3 times
**Look for field day announcement late summer/fall to look at trial results
Untreated for powdery mildew. Gubler Powdery Mildew field day 2009, Herzog Ranch.
JMS Stylet Oil @ 1% applied every 14 days for mildew control (Gubler Powdery Mildew field day 2009, Herzog Ranch)
Gill’s mealybug project summaryKey times for Gill’s seasonal development:
• Spring (May): look for adults on young new spurs, shoots.
• Early Summer (late June in foothills): Treat first generation crawlers on leaves-before they enter clusters.Exact treatment timing depends on location: monitor!
• July-August: Gill’s entering clusters.• Mid-Sept.: 2nd generation produced. More honeydew
obvious. Ants tending.• Overwinter: as nymphs (2nds-3rds) under bark.
Gill’s mealybug project summary
• Cluster damage ratings showed that if left untreated, Gill’s l b b ild d i bl dmealybug can build to undesirable damage.
• All insecticide treatments targeting first generation crawlers were g g geffective in reducing damage in clusters as compared to untreated controls. 8 oz. Movento > 12 oz. Applaud = 1.1 oz. Assail > 8 oz. Applaud. 2 applications of Applaud?
• Parasitized Gill’s mealybugs were found, however numbers were very low and found mainly in untreated blocks. Effect of i ti id N E ?insecticides on N.E.?
• We do not yet know if Gill’s mealybug has the capacity to transmit leafroll virus.
Thanks to:Collaborating growersCollaborating growers,
Industry partners,My field crew: Kelly Brehm, Laurel Schwarzbach, Toni y y , ,
Laubach and Robin Cleveland; and to the Berkeley field crew.