vasomotor symptoms in menopause: physiologic condition and central nervous system approaches to...
TRANSCRIPT
G
VaA
LfpadfsmpUpwd
awmihpzpcmteMcsptht
FGM
R2
RDD11
0©d
Reviews www.AJOG.org
ENERAL GYNECOLOGY
asomotor symptoms in menopause: physiologic conditionnd central nervous system approaches to treatment
ndrea J. Rapkin, MD
mbHbnolfltqmtas
owtppgfp
iqpa
owntsrvftfnpmn
cma
ife expectancy for women is increas-ing worldwide. The mean lifespan
or women in the United States is ap-roximately 80 years,1 and women whore currently 75 years old have 12.4 ad-itional years of life expectancy.2 There-
ore, most women can expect to spend aignificant portion of their lives in a post-
enopausal state. It is estimated that ap-roximately 30 million women in thenited States are now in or past meno-ause and that an additional 6 millionomen will reach this stage during thisecade.3,4
The decline in estrogen levels that isssociated with menopause results in aide range of symptoms. The most com-on are vasomotor symptoms, which
nclude hot flashes (also referred to asot flushes) and night sweats. Meno-ausal symptoms may also include diz-iness, rapid irregular heartbeat, atro-hic vaginitis, bladder irritability, moodhanges, sleep disturbances, headaches,yalgias, arthralgias, difficulty concen-
rating, memory impairment, and gen-ral malaise.5-7 The North American
enopause Society position statementodified the language that is used to de-cribe vasomotor symptoms of meno-ause. They define vasomotor symp-oms as a global term that encompassesot flashes and night sweats.8 This posi-ion statement does not review treat-
rom the Department of Obstetrics andynecology, David Geffen School ofedicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
eceived Nov. 29, 2005; revised April 12,006; accepted May 4, 2006.
eprint requests: Andrea J. Rapkin, MD,epartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology,avid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,0833 LeConte Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90095-740; [email protected].
002-9378/$32.002007 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
moi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.056
ent of mood changes or sleep distur-ances along with vasomotor symptoms.owever, considering sleep distur-
ances in the context of hot flashes andight sweats is logical because a numberf studies have demonstrated strong re-
ationships between self-reported hotashes and sleep complaints.9 In addi-
ion, treatments that reduce the fre-uency of hot flashes can also improveood,10,11 which supports the view that
hese disturbances should be taken intoccount with the treatment of vasomotorymptoms.
Menopausal vasomotor symptomsccur in as many as 74% of menopausalomen,12 and evidence indicates that
hese symptoms are present in higherercentages (up to 88%) of perimeno-ausal women.13-15 These symptomsenerally subside within 1 year; however,or some women, the symptoms mayersist for more than 30 years.16 Further-
OBJECTIVE: The decline in concentrations orise to a range of physiologic and psycholoand quality of life significantly. Most notabflashes and night sweats) and mood and
STUDY DESIGN: This article reviews the pvasomotor symptoms and centrally active, nefficacy for their treatment.
RESULTS: Despite the emergence of a ransymptoms, a need still exists for safe and ethe underlying thermoregulatory mechanisto avoid hormone therapy or for whom ho
CONCLUSION: The availability of centrallysymptoms with risks and benefits clearly dtrials has the potential to allay safety concthese common symptoms.
Key words: menopause, selective serotonnorepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, vasomo
Cite this article as: Rapkin AJ. Vasomotor symptonervous system approaches to treatment. Am J
ore, they can have a marked negative r
FEBRUARY 2007 Am
mpact on health-related and globaluality of life (QOL)17-19 and oftenrompt visits to health care profession-ls.15
Despite high prevalence and deleteri-us effects of symptoms on QOL, manyomen with menopausal symptoms doot seek treatment or receive therapy for
hese symptoms.20 Results from 2 largeurveys that were conducted across Eu-ope indicated that most women sur-eyed believed that they needed more in-ormation about hormone replacementherapy,21,22 which underscores the needor physicians to educate women aboutew and effective therapies for meno-ausal symptoms and to treat them withedications that meet their individual
eeds.Hormone therapy (HT) has been the
ornerstone of the management ofenopausal symptoms for many years
nd has been demonstrated repeatedly to
onadal hormones during menopause giveschanges that may impact a woman’s healthmong these are vasomotor symptoms (hotp disturbances.
iologic condition underlying menopausalormonal therapies that have demonstrated
of nonhormonal treatments for vasomotortive therapeutic options that directly targetfor women who want treatment but preferne therapy is contraindicated.
tive therapies for menopausal vasomotored by results from well-designed clinical
s that are associated with the treatment of
euptake inhibitor, serotonin-symptoms
in menopause: physiologic condition and centraltet Gynecol 2007;196:97-106.
f ggicle aslee
hysonh
geffecmsrmo
acefinern
in rtor
msObs
educe their severity and to improve
erican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 97
QsctaRItHmtmdHdunmutttmccsberas(r�pis
busgtapcbt
LAcgts
rttwtonncsc
PMSTienrtmereetsltEbo
tfmtzpoaqwamcgftett
TPTltdptpmslTsmmffltet
NIEtatnauttbsnntotilowui
NAnpflnls
Reviews General Gynecology www.AJOG.org
9
OL.23-25 However, the treatment land-cape for menopausal symptoms hashanged dramatically since the publica-ion of the Women’s Health Initiativend the Heart and Estrogen/Progestineplacement Study and follow-up.26-28
t has become clear that initial interpre-ations of Women’s Health Initiative andeart and Estrogen/Progestin Replace-ent Study substantially overestimated
he risks of HT for the treatment ofenopausal symptoms. Both trials were
esigned to examine long-term effects ofT for the reduction of coronary heart
isease in an older postmenopausal pop-lation. Their conclusions therefore areot generalizable to short-term treat-ent of a younger, perimenopausal pop-
lation.29-31 Still, the results from theserials have increased dramatically the in-erest of health care practitioners and pa-ients in nonhormonal therapies for
enopausal symptoms. This articleombines a discussion of the physiologicondition that underlies vasomotorymptoms, which includes the interplayetween estrogen, serotonin, and nor-pinephrine, with a review of the cur-ently published clinical trials of neuro-ctive therapies, including not only theelective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsSSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrineeuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), but also the-adrenoceptor antagonists and antido-aminergic agents that have been stud-
ed for the treatment of menopausalymptoms.
Other compounds, which include ti-olone, selective estrogen receptor mod-lators, and phytoestrogens (found inoybeans, black cohosh, whole grains, le-umes, and flaxseed), and other alterna-ive nonprescription compounds arelso available for the treatment of meno-ausal symptoms. However, a full dis-ussion of these treatment options haseen published previously and is beyondhe scope of this review.32-34
ITERATURE SEARCH METHODSPubMed search that was limited to
linical trials that were published in En-lish was conducted with the searcherms hot flash or hot flush or vasomotor
ymptoms (all fields). We eliminated all n8 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
eferences in which vasomotor symp-oms were addressed as side effects ratherhan outcome; in which the test articleas a hormone or a hormone modula-
or, a herbal supplement, soy/isoflavone,r other phytoestrogen; and in whichonmedicinal interventions (eg, mag-ets, behavioral therapy) were used, be-ause they were considered outside thecope of this review. The remaining arti-les are summarized in the Table.
HYSIOLOGIC CONDITION OF
ENOPAUSAL VASOMOTOR
YMPTOMS
he occurrence of vasomotor symptomsn most women is correlated closely withstrogen withdrawal that occurs withatural or surgical menopause. The keyole of estrogen in menopausal symp-oms is supported by the fact that hor-
one replacement is generally acknowl-dged as the most effective therapy foreducing their occurrence.23-25 How-ver, estrogen withdrawal alone does notxplain the cause of menopausal vasomo-or symptoms. This is evidenced by the ob-ervation that there is no significant corre-ation between plasma hormone levels andhe occurrence of vasomotor symptoms.35
strogen withdrawal therefore is necessaryut not sufficient to explain the occurrencef menopausal symptoms.36
A growing body of evidence supportshe hypothesis that hot flashes resultrom the physiologic response to a
arked narrowing of the hypothalamichermoregulatory set point or neutralone (Figure 1).36 This change in setoint increases the chances of sensationf intense heat in response to internalnd environmental triggers and subse-uent activation of heat loss responses,hich include cutaneous vasodilation
nd sweating.16,36 It is assumed that theenopause-associated reduction in cir-
ulating levels of gonadal hormonesives rise to this change in hypothalamicunction. However, the relationship be-ween these events is complex, and thexact trigger that induces a change inhermoregulatory set point activity inhe hypothalamus during menopause is
ot understood fully.7 aFEBRUARY 2007
HERMOREGULATORY SETOINThe key role of a change in the hypotha-
amic thermoregulatory set point or neu-ral zone in the hot flush cascade is un-erscored by the fact that these events arereceded by an increase in core bodyemperature that does not result fromeripheral vasoconstriction or elevatedetabolic rate.37,38 Perspiration and va-
odilation are classic mechanisms of heatoss that are activated during hot flashes.hese responses contribute to night
weats and are initiated by activity in theedial preoptic area of the hypothala-us.24 The changes in hypothalamic
unction that are thought to underlie hotashes and associated symptoms appear
o be related closely to changes in the lev-ls of biogenic amine neurotransmittershat occur in menopausal women.
EUROTRANSMITTER CHANGESN MENOPAUSEstrogen has complex effects in the cen-
ral nervous system (CNS). Menopause-ssociated reductions in circulating es-rogen could lead to imbalances ineurotransmitter levels in the hypothal-mus and other portions of the CNS andltimately result in hot flushes in suscep-
ible individuals. It has been suggestedhat estrogens may alter the activity ofoth the noradrenergic and serotonergicystems by modulating the levels of theseeurotransmitters in the brain. Bothorepinephrine and serotonin are
hought to be involved in the regulationf temperature homeostasis in the hypo-halamus. During menopause, dimin-shed levels of gonadal hormones mayead to instability in CNS concentrationsf both norepinephrine and serotonin,hich results in alterations in thermoreg-lation (eg, a reduced neutral zone) and an
ncreased occurrence of hot flashes.7,39
orepinephrinelarge body of evidence indicates that
orepinephrine plays a central role in theathophysiologic condition of hotashes (Figure 2).36 The involvement oforepinephrine in central thermoregu-
ation and the etiology of hot flashes isupported by results from experimental
nimal studies that showed that in-ccmp4bo
cmatts
a3pari
www.AJOG.org General Gynecology Reviews
reased CNS levels of norepinephrine areorrelated with a narrowing of the ther-oneutral zone.36,40 Freedman38 re-
orted that plasma levels of 3-methoxy--hydroxyphenylglycol, a metabolite ofrain norepinephrine and an indicator
TABLEEffects of centrally active drugs* o
Drug Population† Design
Citalopram (SSRI) Postmenopausal, some withhistory of breast cancer(n � 18)
Prospective
...................................................................................................................Women with inadequate
benefit from venlafaxine(n � 22)
Prospective
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 150) Placebo-con
blind...................................................................................................................Fluoxetine (SSRI) Postmenopausal (n � 150) Placebo-con
blind...................................................................................................................
Postmenopausal, some withhistory of breast cancer(n � 68)
Double-blincross-ove
...................................................................................................................Sertraline (SSRI) Postmenopausal (n � 15) Uncontrolled
open tria...................................................................................................................Fluvoxamine (SSRI) Women with oophorectomy
(n � 42)Open trial,
estrogen...................................................................................................................Paroxetine (SSRI) Men who received androgen
ablation (n � 22)Prospective
...................................................................................................................Women with history of
breast cancer (n � 27)Pilot trial
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 165) Placebo-con
blind, ran...................................................................................................................
Women with hot flashes (n� 107)
Placebo-conblind, rancross-ove
...................................................................................................................Women with breast cancer
(n � 13)Uncontrolled
...................................................................................................................Venlafaxine (SNRI) Women with history of
breast cancer, men whounderwent androgenablation (n � 28)
Pilot
...................................................................................................................Women with history of
breast cancer (n � 191)Double-blin
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 102) Open-label
phase of2000
...................................................................................................................Breast cancer (n � 30) Open-label
...................................................................................................................Men who underwent
androgen ablation (n �21)
Uncontrolled
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 80) Placebo-con
blind, ran
...................................................................................................................Gabapentin Breast cancer (n � 371) Placebo-con
blind, ran...................................................................................................................
Breast cancer (n � 22) Uncontrolled
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 59) Placebo-con
blind, ran
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal, some with
history of breast cancer(n � 20)
Prospectivepilot
f central noradrenergic activity, in- o
reased significantly after a hot flash in 9enopausal women. This suggests that
lterations in CNS levels of this neuro-ransmitter changed before the onset ofhis menopausal symptom. This conclu-ion is consistent with results from an-
vasomotor symptoms
DoseDuration oftrial Effect
trial Stepwise, 10 mg, 20 mg 5 wk Reducedcompa
.........................................................................................................................trial Stepwise, 10 mg, 20 mg 4 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................d, double- Stepwise, 10 mg, 20
mg, 30 mg9 mo No effect
.........................................................................................................................d, double- Stepwise, 10 mg, 20
mg, 30 mg9 mo No effect
.........................................................................................................................domized, 20 mg/d 4 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................ospective 25-50 mg/d Not reported Subjectiv
statisti.........................................................................................................................ared with 50 mg/d, with estrogen 8 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................trial 12.5 mg/d, increased to
37.5 mg/d4 wk Reduced
freque.........................................................................................................................
10 mg/d, then 20 mg/d 5 wk Reducedfreque
.........................................................................................................................d, double-zed
12.5 mg/d or 25 mg/d 6 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................d, double-zed,atified
10 mg/d, 20 mg/d 9 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................n trial 20 mg/d Approximately
4 wkReduced
sleepbaselin
.........................................................................................................................25 mg/d 4 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................domized 37.5 mg/d, 75 mg/d,
150 mg/d4 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................uation
inzi et al,37.5-150 mg/d 8 wk Reduced
(75 mg
.........................................................................................................................37.5 mg/d 8 wk Reduced
from b.........................................................................................................................n trial 12.5 mg twice daily 5 wk Reduced
baselin
.........................................................................................................................d, double-zed
37.5 mg/d, then 75mg/d
12 wk Improvedassessseverit
.........................................................................................................................d, double-zed
300 mg/d, 900 mg/d 8 wk Reducedat 900
.........................................................................................................................n trial 300 mg, 3 times daily 8 wk Reduced
frequebaselin
.........................................................................................................................d, double-zed
900 mg/d, open-labeldose escalation to2700 mg/d after 12wk
12 wk Reducedmg
.........................................................................................................................le-arm Stepwise, 300 to 600 to
900 mg/d5 wk Reduced
compa
ther study that showed that yohimbine, b
FEBRUARY 2007 Am
n �2-adrenergic antagonist, elevates-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycollasma levels and brain norepinephrinend ultimately triggers hot flashes.41 Theole of norepinephrine in hot flashes alsos supported by clinical results that have
Side effects‡ Study
ity, frequencyith baseline
Mild nausea, dry mouth Barton et al10
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Loprinzi et al 52
..................................................................................................................Insomnia Suvanto-Luukkonen
et al59
..................................................................................................................Suvanto-Luukkonen
et al59
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Loprinzi et al 53
..................................................................................................................elioration, no Plouffe et al94
..................................................................................................................ency Nagata et al 58
..................................................................................................................ity,ncreased QOL
Loprinzi et al54
..................................................................................................................ity,ncreased QOL
Somnolence, anxiety Stearns et al49
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Stearns et al 55
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Drowsiness, nausea Stearns et al 56
..................................................................................................................ity, improvedared with
Weitzner et al57
..................................................................................................................ency Loprinzi et al 63
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Appetite loss,
constipation, drymouth
Loprinzi et al64
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Mild appetite loss, dry
mouth, dissipatingnausea
Barton et al65
..................................................................................................................ity, frequencye
Nausea, dry mouth Biglia et al66
..................................................................................................................ency from Quella et al68
..................................................................................................................ective, no effect on
Dry mouth,sleeplessness,decreased appetite
Evans et al67
..................................................................................................................ity, frequency Loss of appetite Pandya et al71
..................................................................................................................ion, severity,ompared with
Pandya et al95
..................................................................................................................ity at �900 Peripheral edema,
somnolence,dizziness
Guttuso et al70
..................................................................................................................ity, frequencyith baseline
Loprinzi et al96
Continued on page 100.
n
pilot severred w
......... ......... pilot sever
......... .........trolle
......... .........trolle
......... .........d, ranr
sever
......... ........., retr
le amcs
......... .........compalone
frequ
......... ........., pilot sever
ncy, i......... .........
severncy, i
......... .........trolledomi
sever
......... .........trolledomir, str
sever
......... ........., ope sever
compe
......... .........frequ
......... .........d, ran sever
......... .........continLopr
sever/d)
......... .........severaselin
......... ........., ope frequ
e
......... .........trolledomi
subjmenty
......... .........trolledomi
severmg
......... ........., ope durat
ncy ce
......... .........trolledomi
sever
......... ........., sing sever
red w
een obtained with clonidine, an �2-
erican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 99
anbmm
SSrE
loct
Reviews General Gynecology www.AJOG.org
1
drenergic agonist that reduces centraloradrenergic activity.5,42 This agent haseen used with modest efficacy as a treat-ent for women with menopausal vaso-
TABLEEffects of centrally active drugs* oContinued from page 99.
Drug Population† Design
Clonidine (alphaadrenergicagonist)
Postmenopausal (n � 86) Placebo-conblind, cro
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 30) Placebo-con
blind...................................................................................................................
Women with hot flashes (n� 37)
Placebo-conblind, cro
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 10) Placebo-con
response
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 14) Placebo-con
blind, cro...................................................................................................................
Postmenopausal, tamoxifen-induced (n � 194)
Randomizedplacebo-
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal, tamoxifen-
induced (n � 110)Placebo-con
blind, cro
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 41) Placebo-con
blind, cro...................................................................................................................Methyldopa (alpha
adrenergicagonist)
Postmenopausal (n � 28) Placebo-conblind, cro
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 24) Placebo-con
blind, cro
...................................................................................................................Veralipride
(antidopaminergic)Postmenopausal (n � 29)
...................................................................................................................Premenopausal,
gonadotropin-releasinghormoneagonist-inducedhot flashes (n � 36)
Randomizedplacebo-
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 40) Randomized
placebo-...................................................................................................................
Postmenopausal (n � 47) Randomizedplacebo-crossove
...................................................................................................................Gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonist-inducedhot flashes (n � 25)
Open obser
...................................................................................................................Postmenopausal (n � 40) Double-blin
...................................................................................................................Veralipride,
bromocriptine,Liposom,domperdome
Postmenopausal (n � 75) Randomizedplacebo-
...................................................................................................................Mirtazapine Women with history of
breast cancer (n � 22)Prospective
pilot...................................................................................................................Moclobemide
(monoamineoxidaseinhibitor)
Postmenopausal (n � 28) Randomizedplacebo-
...................................................................................................................Propranolol (beta
blocker)Perimenopausal (n � 25) Prospective
randomiz...................................................................................................................
* The entries are the results of a PubMed literature search onif (1) vasomotor symptoms were side effects rather than anphytoestrogen; or (3) trials used nonmedicinal interventions.† Subjects with available data.‡ Where reported to be significant.
otor symptoms.6 w
00 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
erotoninerotonin also appears to play a pivotalole in the hot flash cascade (Figure 3).7
strogen withdrawal may be correlated
vasomotor symptoms
DoseDuration oftrial Effect
d, double-er
25-75 �g twice daily 8 wk Reducedfreque
.........................................................................................................................d, double- 0.1 mg/d, transdermally 10 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................d, double-er
0.050- 0.075 mg/d 12 wk No effect
.........................................................................................................................d, dose- 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 mg/d 6 wk Reduced
compa
.........................................................................................................................d, double-er
0.1 mg/d 10 wk No effect
.........................................................................................................................ble-blind,lled
0.1 mg/d 8 wk Reducedincrea
.........................................................................................................................d, double-er
0.1 mg/d 8 wk Small bureducefreque
.........................................................................................................................d, double-er
0.050 mg twice daily 13 wk No effect
.........................................................................................................................d, double-er
250-500 mg twice daily 60 d, 14 dwashout
Reduced
.........................................................................................................................d, double-er
375-1125 mg/d 8-16 wk No effectcompasubjecin “troflushes
.........................................................................................................................100 mg/d with raloxifene
60 mg/d6 mo Reduced
.........................................................................................................................ble-blind,lled
100 mg/d 2 mo Reduced
.........................................................................................................................ble-blind,lled
100 mg/d 30 d Reduced
.........................................................................................................................ble-blind,lled,
100 mg/d 80 d Reduced
.........................................................................................................................al trial 100 mg/d 28 d Reduced
severitreporte
.........................................................................................................................domized 100 mg/d compared
with 1.25 mg/destrogen
20 d Reducedseveritestrog
.........................................................................................................................ble-blind,lled
100 mg/d veralipride,3.75 mg/dbromocriptine, 40mg/d im Liposom, 10mg/d domperdome
20 d Reducedseveritcompa
.........................................................................................................................le-arm, 7.5 mg/d, then 15 mg/d,
then 30 mg/d5 wk Reduced
freque.........................................................................................................................ble-blind,lled
150 mg/d or 300 mg/d 5 wk Reduced
.........................................................................................................................ble-blind, 40 mg, 3 times daily 8 wk No effect
.........................................................................................................................
terms hot flash, hot flush, and vasomotor symptoms, limited to come measure; (2) test article was a hormone or a direct hormo
ith a decline in circulating serotonin n
FEBRUARY 2007
evels that could increase the sensitivityf hypothalamic serotonin (5-HT2A) re-eptors. This change may also contributeo a narrowing of the thermoregulatory
Side effects‡ Study
ity,uration
Dry mouth Clayden et al73
..................................................................................................................ency Nagamani et al 74
..................................................................................................................No different from
placeboSalmi and
Punnonen75
..................................................................................................................encyith baseline
Severe fatigue, nausea,headaches,irritability, dizziness
Laufer et al78
..................................................................................................................equency Wren and Brown 76
..................................................................................................................ency,OL
Difficulty sleeping Pandya et al79
..................................................................................................................ificanterity,
Dry mouth,constipation,drowsiness
Goldberg et al77
..................................................................................................................Lindsay and Hart 97
..................................................................................................................ency Nesheim and
Saetre81
..................................................................................................................equencyith placebo,provement
caused by hot
Andersen et al82
..................................................................................................................ashes Morgante et al83
..................................................................................................................ency, severity Hyperprolactinemia Vercellini et al 84
..................................................................................................................ency, severity Melis et al 85
..................................................................................................................ency, severity Increased estradiol,
hyperprolactinemia,galactorrhea
David et al86
..................................................................................................................ency,statistics
Vercellini et al87
..................................................................................................................ency,different than
Wesel et al88
..................................................................................................................ency,drugsith placebo
Mastodynia,galactorrhea
Zichella et al89
..................................................................................................................ity,o statistics
Increase in appetite,dry mouth
Perez et al90
..................................................................................................................ity Tarim et al 91
..................................................................................................................Coope et al92
..................................................................................................................
l trials published in English. References were eliminatedodulator, a herbal supplement, soy/isoflavone, or other
n
trolless-ov
severncy, d
......... .........trolle frequ
......... .........trolless-ov......... .........trolle frequ
red w
......... .........trolless-ov
on fr
......... ........., dou
controfrequ
sed Q......... .........trolless-ov
t signd sevncy
......... .........trolless-ov
......... .........trolless-ov
frequ
......... .........trolless-ov
on frred wtive imuble”
......... .........hot fl
......... ........., dou
controfrequ
......... ........., dou
controfrequ
......... ........., dou
contror
frequ
......... .........vation frequ
y, nod
......... .........d, ran frequ
y, noen
......... ........., dou
controfrequy, allred w
......... ........., sing sever
ncy, n......... ........., dou
controsever
......... ........., doued
......... .........
the linicaoutc ne m
eutral zone and an increased risk of hot
floctipthsltdtm
MMctfwrcbtmatweiaocupa
wtdt
NMSAbmmtaese
t
psdtcSndb
SStttsrRcidhampdbbHsa(fhwtnnstidp
Rfvctdsaet
Fm2T
Fm2T
www.AJOG.org General Gynecology Reviews
ash occurrences.43,44 After an internalr external thermostimulus, rising con-entrations of ligand stimulate the sero-onin (5-HT2A) receptor, which resultsn a change in the thermoregulatory setoint and a subsequent hot flash sensa-ion. The importance of serotonin in theot flash cascade is underscored by re-ults from a comparison of serotoninevels in women with mild vs moderate-o-severe menopausal symptoms that in-icates an association between concen-ration of serotonin and severity of
enopausal symptoms.45
ood and sleep disturbancesood and sleep disturbances are in-
luded in the array of menopausal symp-oms, and their occurrence may resultrom changes in CNS transmitters,hich include serotonin, norepineph-
ine, dopamine, and endorphins.46 Theentral importance of the relationshipetween estrogens and the serotonin sys-em in mood regulation in women with
enopause is supported by results fromsmall-scale study that demonstrates
hat the blockade of serotonin receptorsith metergoline reversed the positive
ffects of estrogen replacement on moodn perimenopausal women.47 Serotoninlso plays a key role in the regulationf sleep,48 and menopause-associatedhanges in serotonin levels may contrib-te to sleep disorders. This view is sup-orted by the fact that treatment with
FIGURE 1Small core body temperature(Tc) elevations that act withina reduced thermoneutral zonetrigger hot flashes insymptomatic postmenopausalwomen.
reedman RR. Pathophysiology and treatment ofenopausal hot flashes. Semin Reprod Med
005, 23:117-25. Reprinted with permission ofhieme.
n SSRI improves sleep in menopausal
omen.49 Although it has been suggestedhat disturbed sleep in menopause may beue to hot flashes,50 recent results indicatehat this is not entirely the case.51
EUROACTIVE AGENTS FORENOPAUSAL VASOMOTOR
YMPTOMSwide range of neuroactive agents has
een evaluated for the treatment ofenopausal symptoms. Most of theseedications have been tested in rela-
ively short-term, small-scale clinical tri-ls. However, these drugs have been usedxtensively for other indications, and theafety of most of them is supported byxtensive long-term data.
The Table summarizes the clinical trialshat were conducted on centrally active
FIGURE 2Role of norepinephrine in thedevelopment of hot flashes.
reedom RR. Pathophysiology and treatment ofenopausal hot flashes. Semin Reprod Med
005;23:117-25. Reprinted with permission ofhieme.
e
FEBRUARY 2007 Ame
rescription alternatives to HT. Most aremall-scale studies, but several large, ran-omized, double-blind, placebo-con-rolled trials have been completed. Thelasses of drugs that were evaluated includeSRIs, SNRIs, �-adrenoceptor antago-ists, and antidopaminergic drugs. Severalrugs that fall outside these groups haveeen examined also.
SRISSRIs have been evaluated extensively asreatment for menopausal mood symp-oms and could be considered rationalherapy for vasomotor menopausalymptoms, given the well-documentedole of serotonin in thermoregulation.esults from small-scale, short-termlinical trials have shown that the admin-stration of SSRIs may be effective in re-uction of the frequency and severity ofot flashes.10,49,52-57 These treatmentslso have been demonstrated to improveood, sleep, anxiety, and QOL in meno-
ausal women and in women who un-ergo estrogen-deprivation therapy forreast cancer.10,49,55 SSRIs also haveeen combined effectively with low-doseT. Results from a small-scale trial
howed that the combination of fluvox-mine (50 mg/d) with low-dose estrogen0.3125 mg/d) was significantly more ef-ective than estrogen alone in relievingot flashes and depressive symptoms inomen who had undergone oophorec-
omy (P � .036).58 However, it should beoted that clinical results for SSRIs areot uniformly positive. Results from atudy of fluoxetine and citalopram (eachitrated to a maximum dose of 30 mg/d)ndicated no significant benefit of eitherrug vs placebo in relieving hot flashes inostmenopausal women.59
Variability in clinical trial results for SS-Is may be related to the selectivity of dif-
erent agents in this class for the serotonins the norepinephrine transporter. Be-ause both neurotransmitters are thoughto be involved in thermoregulation and theevelopment of menopausal vasomotorymptoms, it is reasonable to suggest thatctivity at both transporters may be moreffective than high selectivity for only 1 ofhem. Paroxetine is the SSRI with the high-
st activity at the norepinephrine trans-rican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 101
ptpcmrhev
ed3mwaace
SRBamem
tifisuavniiiafcfltvmewdswcc
ct1flabttvhloe
harmtwa
ATNc
Ir
Reviews General Gynecology www.AJOG.org
1
orter,60 and it has been shown repeatedlyo be effective for the treatment of meno-ausal vasomotor symptoms.49,55,57 Inontrast, fluoxetine and citalopram haveuch lower affinities for the norepineph-
ine transporter,60 and each of these SSRIsas been shown to have modest or variablefficacy in decreasing the frequency or se-erity of hot flashes vs placebo.10,53,59
Although SSRIs generally are well tol-rated, their use may be limited by sexualysfunction that may occur in as many as0% of women who are treated.61 Treat-ent with SSRIs also may be associatedith weight gain,62 which may decrease
dherence to potentially effective ther-py. The use of the lowest effective dosesan reduce the frequency of their adverseffects.56,62
EROTONIN-NOREPINEPHRINEEUPTAKE INHIBITORS
ecause norepinephrine and serotoninre both involved in the development ofenopausal symptoms, it is plausible to
xpect that an agent that is designed to
FIGURE 3In the premenopausal state, estrogthermoregulatory response (periph
n the menopausal state, estrogen concentrationsesponse to external thermal stimuli. In the abs
odulate these systems might be effec- 1
02 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
ive in reducing the frequency and sever-ty of these symptoms. Although resultsrom large-scale, long-term clinical stud-es are lacking, results from smaller-cale, well-controlled trials support these of agents in this class.63-68 Evans etl67 have demonstrated that the SNRIenlafaxine (dosed at 75 mg/d) was sig-ificantly superior to placebo in decreas-
ng interference by hot flashes with activ-ties of daily living in a 12-week trial thatncluded 80 menopausal women. Over-ll, venlafaxine decreased hot flash scoresrom baseline by 51% vs 15% for pla-ebo. Venlafaxine did not decrease hotash severity significantly in these pa-
ients. Nevertheless, 93% of women onenlafaxine planned to continue treat-ent after the study concluded. Loprinzi
t al64 have demonstrated that treatmentith venlafaxine for 4 weeks significantlyecreased the combined frequency andeverity of hot flashes in postmenopausalomen who did not want to take HT be-
ause of a history of breast cancer or con-ern about malignancy. In this study of
s stabilize the thermoregulatory setl vasodilation or constriction) to ex
decreased, and the set point is unstable, whiche of pharmacologic intervention, the set point r
91 patients (50 women received pla- o
FEBRUARY 2007
ebo, and 49, 43, and 49 women werereated with venlafaxine 37.5, 75.0, or50.0 mg/d, respectively), median hotash scores (a combination of frequencynd severity) were reduced from baseliney 27%, 37%, 61%, and 61%, respec-ively (P � .001 for the difference be-ween all venlafaxine treatment groupss placebo). Recently presented resultsave shown that a metabolite of ven-
afaxine is also effective in animal modelsf hot flashes, but its efficacy has yet to bevaluated in clinical trials.39
The efficacy of venlafaxine in reducingot flash activity must be balancedgainst possible adverse effects (tempo-ary nausea, decreased appetite, dryouth, sleeplessness, and constipation)
hat are seen with this drug.64-66 Patientsho are treated with venlafaxine may
lso experience sexual dysfunction.69
DDITIONAL NONHORMONALHERAPIESeuroactive agents from several other
lasses have been used for the treatment
oint, which results in a normalnal thermal stimuli.
ults in an altered vasodilatory thermoregulatoryjusts.7
en pera ter
are resenc ead
f hot flashes in menopausal women. Re-
stttmtfTgfspembttl
btembdhtfasPwfl9tstnwbdmtfmw
neaotveml
omnpisacstdctortamctaptpb�aadrtpdtd
aiSbspgrei
t(msbms
demaiidMmTd6pogpdffl
NrflwscmdcavISMrcwtfletmdGt
NNmr(rlda
www.AJOG.org General Gynecology Reviews
ults from a small-scale, short-term con-rolled clinical trial have demonstratedhat the anticonvulsant gabapentin (ti-rated up to 2700 mg/d) is significantly
ore effective than placebo in the reduc-ion of composite scores that reflect therequency and severity of hot flashes.70
his study of 59 women indicated thatabapentin 900 mg/d decreased hot flashrequency by 45% and the compositecore by 54% (P � .002 and P � .01 vslacebo, respectively). Loprinzi et al64
valuated gabapentin (titrated to 900g/d) in 20 women with a history of
reast cancer who did not want HT. Inhis small study, gabapentin decreasedhe frequency of hot flashes from base-ine by 66%.
In a large-scale, randomized, double-lind, placebo-controlled multiinstitu-ional trial, Pandya et al71 examined thefficacy of 2 doses of gabapentin (300g/d and 900 mg/d) in women with
reast cancer. Gabapentin treatment re-uced both the frequency and severity ofot flashes compared with placebo forhe higher dose only. At 900 mg/d, therequency of hot flashes dropped by 41%nd 44% at weeks 4 and 8, respectively,ignificantly greater than placebo (18%,
� .0001; 15%, P � .0002). After 4eeks of treatment, severity of hotashes had decreased by 49% for the00-mg/d group compared with 21% forhe placebo group (P �.0001). Hot flasheverity was also significantly reduced af-er 8 weeks of treatment (P � .007), buto further decrease was seen from theeek 4 measures (46% decrease fromaseline for the 900-mg/d group; 15%ecrease for placebo group). Slightlyore subjects in the gabapentin groups
han in the placebo group withdrewrom the study because of side effects; the
ost common side effect that was citedas somnolence.Adverse events (which include som-
olence, dizziness, rash, and peripheraldema) have resulted in the discontinu-tion of therapy by approximately 15%f patients who received this antiepilep-ic drug for the treatment of menopausalasomotor symptoms.72 Clinical experi-nce has indicated that the use of thisedication in some populations can also
ead to weight gain. e
Clonidine is an �-adrenoceptor antag-nist that was developed for the treat-ent of hypertension. Results from a
umber of small-scale studies of meno-ausal women and women who were be-
ng treated with tamoxifen have demon-trated modest efficacy for thisgent.73-79 Clonidine must be used withare because it is a potent antihyperten-ive. Nevertheless, results from 1 con-rolled study indicated no adverse hemo-ynamic effects of a 0.1-mg/d orallonidine dose in women who experiencedamoxifen-associated hot flashes.79 Theverall tolerability of oral clonidine iselatively poor, with a 40% discontinua-ion rate because of adverse eventsmong 10 women who were treated forenopausal symptoms.78 A transdermal
lonidine (0.6 mg transdermal therapeu-ic system) preparation has better toler-bility than the oral drug,80 but it ap-ears to have very limited usefulness forhe treatment of hot flashes because itrovides only a 10% reduction fromaseline in symptom severity.77 A second-adrenoceptor antagonist, methyldopa,lso has been examined in 2 small tri-ls.81,82 Both studies found that methyl-opa was more effective than placebo ineducing hot flashes, but in other studies,he drug has been found to have seriousotential side effects that include re-uced blood pressure, positive Coombsest, hemolytic anemia, and liver disor-ers.8
Veralipride, a benzamide derivativentidopaminergic drug, has been testedn small trials, mainly outside the Unitedtates.83-89 At a dose of 100 mg/d, it haseen shown to reduce the frequency andeverity of hot flashes in postmeno-ausal women and women who receiveonadotropin-releasing HT for menor-hagia or endometriosis. However, sideffects of veralipride included increasesn prolactin levels and galactorrhea.
Several additional agents have beenhe subjects of single trials. Mirtazapinea tetracyclic piperinoazepine analog ofianserin with activity at histaminergic,
erotonin, and �2-adrenoceptors) haseen shown to be effective for the treat-ent of hot flashes in an open-label
tudy that enrolled 22 subjects. How-
ver, 18% of the women in this trial with- fFEBRUARY 2007 Ame
rew because of intolerable adversevents (excessive somnolence, dryouth, headache, flu-like symptoms,
nd muscle ache).90 The monoamine ox-dase inhibitor moclobemide was exam-ned in a small (n � 28) randomized,ouble-blind, placebo-controlled trial.91
oclobemide was tested at 2 doses, 150g/d and 300 mg/d, in the 5-week trial.he 150-mg/d group showed the greatestecrease in hot flash severity score, with a9.8% reduction from baseline com-ared with 24.4% for placebo. Propran-lol, a potent beta-1 and beta-2 adrener-ic antagonist, was tested in 25erimenopausal women.92 A 40-mgose given 3 times daily was no more ef-
ective than placebo at controlling hotashes.In its 2004 position statement, theorth American Menopause Society
ecommended venlafaxine, paroxetine,uoxetine, or gabapentin for womenith moderate to severe vasomotor
ymptoms who have concerns about orontraindications for HT.8 The state-ent described clonidine and methyl-
opa as having “only moderate efficacyombined with a relatively high rate ofdverse events.” An evidence-based re-iew published as part of the Nationalnstitutes of Health 2005 State-of-the-cience Conference on Management ofenopausal Symptoms made similar
ecommendations.93 The review con-luded that venlafaxine and paroxetineere the most effective of the newer an-
idepressants for the treatment of hotashes but added a caveat that parox-tine may interfere with tamoxifen in pa-ients with breast cancer. Citalopram
ay be effective for women whose con-ition does not respond to venlafaxine.abapentin was also considered effec-
ive.For all drugs, the reviews of both theorth American Menopause Society andational Institutes of Health recom-ended doses at the low end of the
anges that were tested in clinical trialsTable).8,93 The SSRIs/SNRIs effectivelyeduce numbers of hot flashes at dosesower than those that are used for anti-epressant therapy, and lower doses aressociated with fewer and milder side ef-
ects. The North American Menopauserican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 103
Sl1mchppidtHdtvbSrtpwg
CTmsislneearmapcp
miwscmrdoptmtw
opmm
tflsbCmtsaespattstpcspftmsmaafpaft
AIp
R1S2oMah23sM4t
WO5A6cs7I28msA29S1Pfl1PsttpM1CptH1GtO1paH1np1a51qV1Emt11Rm12epe2dt2
Reviews General Gynecology www.AJOG.org
1
ociety specifically recommended ven-afaxine at 37.5 to 75 mg/d, paroxetine at2.5 to 25 mg/d, and fluoxetine at 20g/d, starting at lower doses and in-
reasing after 1 week. SSRIs and SNRIsave been approved for long-term use inatients with mood disorders (major de-ressive disorder and anxiety disorders);
t is well-known that relief from moodisorder symptoms may not occur untilreatment has continued for 4 to 8 weeks.owever, time-to-onset of efficacy and
uration of treatment have not been es-ablished in patients who are treated forasomotor symptoms. The reports ofoth the North American Menopauseociety and National Institutes of Healthecommended tapering the dose at theermination of treatment to minimizeosttreatment emergent adverse events,hich may be similar to treatment emer-ent adverse events.
OMMENThe physiologic mechanisms underlyingenopausal vasomotor symptoms are
till not completely understood, but anncreasing body of evidence links theseymptoms to an alteration in hypotha-amic thermoregulation and changes ineuromodulatory systems that arevoked by decreased levels of circulatingstrogen. Understanding what is knownbout the probable roles of norepineph-ine and serotonin in menopausal vaso-otor symptoms and how their actions
re influenced by nonhormonal thera-ies may help physicians when they dis-uss these treatment options with theiratients.Although no current treatment forenopausal vasomotor symptoms is
deal, neuroactive agents that interactith both norepinephrine and serotonin
ystems would appear to be a rationalhoice for treatment, given the involve-ent of both of these amines in thermo-
egulation. These agents have some un-esirable adverse effects and may havether actions that are unrelated to meno-ausal vasomotor symptoms. An idealreatment should be directed at the ther-
oregulatory dysfunction that gives riseo these symptoms and has minimal un-
anted effects in the body. It should be 104 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
rally bioavailable, safe, and have lowotential for interactions with otheredications that are likely to be taken byiddle-aged and older women.Many menopausal women experience
roubling symptoms that can include hotashes, night sweats, mood changes, andleep disturbances. These symptoms areelieved to be related to a dysfunction inNS thermoregulatory circuitry. Forany years, HT has been the mainstay of
reatment for menopausal vasomotorymptoms, and results from clinical tri-ls have demonstrated its efficacy repeat-dly. Recent concerns about long-termafety of standard-dose HT haverompted careful reanalysis of the risksnd benefits that are associated with thisherapy and heightened interest in otherreatments for menopausal vasomotorymptoms. Treatment of these symp-oms with either SSRIs or SNRIs is sup-orted by results from multiple well-ontrolled clinical trials. Less evidenceupports the use of other drugs (eg, gaba-entin, clonidine). An unmet need exists
or safe and effective therapeutic optionshat directly target thermoregulatory
echanisms that underlie menopausalymptoms for women who want treat-
ent but who prefer to avoid HT. Thevailability of new therapies with risksnd benefits clearly defined by resultsrom well-designed clinical trials has theotential to allay safety concerns that aressociated with the current treatmentsor menopausal vasomotor symp-oms. f
CKNOWLEDGMENTthank Dr Mary E. Hanson for assistance in thereparation of this manuscript.
EFERENCES. United States Life Tables, 2002. Natl Vitaltat Rep 2004;53:33-4.. Health, United States, 2004, with chart bookn trends in the health of Americans. Hyattsville,D: National Center for Health Statistics. Avail-
ble at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/us04trend.pdf. Accessed on: October 18,005.. Hammond CB. HEDIS 2000: strategies foruccessful menopause management. Am Janag Care 2000;6(suppl):S738-41.. United States Bureau of the Census. Projec-ions of the populations of the United States:
977 to 2050. In: Current population reports. wFEBRUARY 2007
ashington, DC: US Government Printingffice. p. 25-27.. Freedman RR. Physiology of hot flashes.m J Hum Biol 2001;13:453-64.. Miller RG, Ashar BH. Managing menopause:urrent therapeutic options for vasomotorymptoms. Adv Stud Med 2004;4:484-92.. Stearns V, Ullmer L, Lopez JF, Smith Y,
saacs C, Hayes D. Hot flushes. Lancet002;360:1851-61.. North American Menopause Society. Treat-ent of menopause-associated vasomotor
ymptoms: position statement of the Northmerican Menopause Society. Menopause004;11:11-33.. Moe KE. Hot flashes and sleep in women.leep Med Rev 2004;8:487-97.0. Barton DL, Loprinzi CL, Novotny P, et al.ilot evaluation of citalopram for the relief of hotashes. J Support Oncol 2003;1:47-51.1. Saure A, Planellas J, Poulsen HK, Jaszczak. A double-blind, randomized, comparativetudy evaluating clinical effects of two sequen-ial estradiol-progestogen combinations con-aining either desogestrel or medroxy-rogesterone acetate in climacteric women.aturitas 2005;34:133-42.2. Kritz-Silverstein D, Goldani VM, Barrett-onnor E. Prevalence and clustering of meno-ausal symptoms in older women by hysterec-omy and oophorectomy status. J Womensealth Gend Based Med 2000;9:747-55.3. Dennerstein L, Dudley EC, Hopper JL,uthrie JR, Burger HG. A prospective popula-
ion-based study of menopausal symptoms.bstet Gynecol 2000;96:351-8.4. Feldman BM, Voda A, Gronseth E. Therevalence of hot flash and associated variablesmong perimenopausal women. Res Nursealth 1985;8:261-8.5. Guthrie JR, Dennerstein L, Taffe JR, Don-elly V. Health care-seeking for menopausalroblems. Climacteric 2003;6:112-7.6. Kronenberg F. Hot flashes: epidemiologynd physiology. Ann NY Acad Sci 1990;592:2-86.7. Bobula JD. Vasomotor symptoms anduality of life (QoL) in postmenopausal women.alue Health 2003;6:707.8. Brazier JE, Roberts J, Platts M, Zoellner YF.stimating a preference-based index for aenopause specific health quality of life ques-
ionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcome 2005;3:3-22.9. Daly E, Gray A, Barlow D, McPherson K,oche M, Vessey M. Measuring the impact ofenopausal symptoms on quality of life. BMJ993;307:836-40.0. Genazzani AR, Nicolucci A, Campagnoli C,t al. Assessment of the QoL in Italian meno-ausal women: comparison between HRT us-rs and non-users. Maturitas 2002;42:267-80.1. Rozenberg S, Fellemans C, Kroll M, Van-romme J. The menopause in Europe. Int J Fer-il Women Med 2000;45:182-9.2. Schneider HP. Cross-national study of
omen’s use of hormone replacement therapy(12ahst2Cfl2m22iappg2N6g(2aird32Hth23ts3ps23paM3ms3vP3Vo13mM3Ccw23vfl
3Di(W4at4p14Sp14fl4Jcrt24mtp64rdC14gf84am64tcb15MtehpH5dS5Pof5Ph5Pfl
5Pmt5ert5MmiM5cwvhs5stsc26daS6si26rc6PtJ6Vst6Pcc26ttv6MmcG6eflt16oo
www.AJOG.org General Gynecology Reviews
HRT) in Europe. Int J Fertil Women Med997;42(suppl):365-75.3. Gambacciani M, Ciaponi M, Cappagli B, etl. Effects of low-dose, continuous combinedormone replacement therapy on sleep inymptomatic postmenopausal women. Maturi-as 2005;50:91-7.4. Shanafelt TD, Barton DL, Adjei AA, LoprinziL. Pathophysiology and treatment of hotashes. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:1207-18.5. Sikon A, Thacker HL. Treatment options forenopausal hot flashes. Cleve Clin J Med004;71:578-82.6. Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Random-
zed trial of estrogen plus progestin for second-ry prevention of coronary heart disease inostmenopausal women: Heart and Estrogen/rogestin Replacement Study (HERS) researchroup. JAMA 1998;280:605-13.7. Hulley S, Furberg C, Barrett-Connor E, et al.oncardiovascular disease outcomes during.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estro-en/progestin Replacement study follow-up
HERS II). JAMA 2002;288:58-66.8. Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, etl. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin
n healthy postmenopausal women: principalesults from the Women’s Health Initiative ran-omized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:21-33.9. Grodstein F, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ.ormone therapy and coronary heart disease:
he role of time since menopause and age atormone initiation. J Womens Health (Larchmt)006;15:35-44.0. Klaiber EL, Vogel W, Rako S. A critique ofhe Women’s Health Initiative hormone therapytudy. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1589-601.1. Salpeter S. Hormone therapy for youngerostmenopausal women: How can we makeense out of the evidence? Climacteric005;8:307-10.2. Kessel B, Kronenberg F. The role of com-lementary and alternative medicine in man-gement of menopausal symptoms. Endocrinoletab Clin North Am 2004;33:717-39.3. Robertson JF. Selective oestrogen receptorodulators/new antioestrogens: a clinical per-
pective. Cancer Treat Rev 2004;30:695-706.4. Swegle JM, Kelly MW. Tibolone: a uniqueersion of hormone replacement therapy. Annharmacother 2004;38:874-81.5. Hutton JD, Jacobs HS, Murray MA, JamesH. Relation between plasma oestrone andestradiol and climacteric symptoms. Lancet978;1:678-81.6. Freedman RR. Pathophysiology and treat-ent of menopausal hot flashes. Semin Reproded 2005;23:117-25.7. Freedman RR, Norton D, Woodward S,ornelissen G. Core body temperature and cir-adian rhythm of hot flashes in menopausalomen. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:354-8.8. Freedman RR. Biochemical, metabolic, andascular mechanisms in menopausal hot
ashes. Fertil Steril 1998;70:332-7. 19. Deecher DC, Leventhal L, Numan S, et al.esvenlafaxine alleviates vasomotor instability
n two rodent models of hot flush. CollegevillePA): Women’s Health Research Institute,
yeth Research; 2005.0. Bruck K, Hinckel P. Thermoregulatory nor-drenergic and serotonergic pathways to hypo-halamic units. J Physiol 1980;304:193-202.1. Maas J. MHPG: basic mechanisms andsychopathology. New York: Academic Press;983.2. Freedman RR, Woodward S, SabharwalC. Alpha 2-adrenergic mechanism in meno-ausal hot flushes. Obstet Gynecol990;76:573-8.3. Berendsen HH. The role of serotonin in hotushes. Maturitas 2000;36:155-64.4. Sipe K, Leventhal L, Burroughs K, Cosmi S,ohnston GH, Deecher DC. Serotonin 2A re-eptors modulate tail-skin temperature in twoodent models of estrogen deficiency-relatedhermoregulatory dysfunction. Brain Res004;1028:191-202.5. Slopien R, Meczekalski B, Warenik-Szy-ankiewicz A. Relationship between climac-
eric symptoms and serum serotonin levels inostmenopausal women. Climacteric 2003;:53-7.6. Vliet EL, Davis VL. New perspectives on theelationship of hormone changes to affectiveisorders in the perimenopause. NAACOGSlin Issue Perinat Womens Health Nurs991;2:453-71.7. Rubinow DR, Schmidt PJ, Roca CA. Estro-en-serotonin interactions: implications for af-
ective regulation. Biol Psychiatr 1998;44:39-50.8. Portas CM, Bjorvatn B, Ursin R. Serotoninnd the sleep/wake cycle: special emphasis onicrodialysis studies. Prog Neurobiol 2000;0:13-35.9. Stearns V, Isaacs C, Rowland J, et al. A pilotrial assessing the efficacy of paroxetine hydro-hloride (Paxil) in controlling hot flashes inreast cancer survivors. Ann Oncol 2000;1:17-22.0. Henderson VW, Klein BEK, Resnick SM.enopause and disorders of neurologic func-
ion, mental health, and the eye. In: Wenger N,d. International position paper on women’sealth and menopause: a comprehensive ap-roach. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes ofealth; 2002:251-70.1. Freedman RR, Roehrs TA. Lack of sleepisturbance from menopausal hot flashes. Fertilteril 2004;82:138-44.2. Loprinzi CL, Flynn PJ, Carpenter LA, et al.ilot evaluation of citalopram for the treatmentf hot flashes in women with inadequate benefit
rom venlafaxine. J Palliat Med 2005;8:924-30.3. Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Perez EA, et al.hase III evaluation of fluoxetine for treatment ofot flashes. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1578-83.4. Loprinzi CL, Barton DL, Carpenter LA, et al.ilot evaluation of paroxetine for treating hotashes in men. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:
247-51. JFEBRUARY 2007 Ame
5. Stearns V, Beebe KL, Iyengar M, Dube E.aroxetine controlled release in the treatment ofenopausal hot flashes: a randomized con-
rolled trial. JAMA 2003;289:2827-34.6. Stearns V, Slack R, Greep N, et al. Parox-tine is an effective treatment for hot flashes:esults from a prospective randomized clinicalrial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6919-30.7. Weitzner MA, Moncello J, Jacobsen PB,inton S. A pilot trial of paroxetine for the treat-ent of hot flashes and associated symptoms
n women with breast cancer. J Pain Symptomanage 2002;23:337-45.8. Nagata H, Nozaki M, Nakano H. Short-termombinational therapy of low-dose estrogenith selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (flu-oxamine) for oophorectomized women withot flashes and depressive tendencies. J Ob-tet Gynaecol Res 2005;31:107-14.9. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Koivunen R, Sund-trom H, et al. Citalopram and fluoxetine in thereatment of postmenopausal symptoms: a pro-pective, randomized, 9-month, placebo-ontrolled, double-blind study. Menopause005;12:18-26.0. Nemeroff CB, Owens MJ. Pharmacologicifferences among the SSRIs: focus on mono-mine transporters and the HPA axis. CNSpectr 2004;9(suppl):23-31.1. Bachmann GA. Menopausal vasomotorymptoms: a review of causes, effects and ev-
dence-based treatment options. J Reprod Med005;50:155-65.2. Masand PS, Gupta S. Selective serotonin-euptake inhibitors: an update. Harv Rev Psy-hiatr 1999;7:69-84.3. Loprinzi CL, Pisansky TM, Fonseca R, et al.ilot evaluation of venlafaxine hydrochloride for
he therapy of hot flashes in cancer survivors.Clin Oncol 1998;16:2377-81.4. Loprinzi CL, Kugler JW, Sloan JA, et al.enlafaxine in management of hot flashes inurvivors of breast cancer: a randomised con-rolled trial. Lancet 2000;356:2059-63.5. Barton D, LaVasseur B, Loprinzi C, Novotny, Wilwerding MB, Sloan J. Venlafaxine for theontrol of hot flashes: results of a longitudinalontinuation study. Oncol Nurs Forum002;29:33-40.6. Biglia N, Torta R, Roagna R, et al. Evalua-ion of low-dose venlafaxine hydrochloride forhe therapy of hot flushes in breast cancer sur-ivors. Maturitas 2005;52:78-85.7. Evans ML, Pritts E, Vittinghoff E, McClish K,organ KS, Jaffe RB. Management of post-enopausal hot flushes with venlafaxine hydro-
hloride: a randomized, controlled trial. Obstetynecol 2005;105:161-6.8. Quella SK, Loprinzi CL, Sloan J, et al. Pilotvaluation of venlafaxine for the treatment of hotashes in men undergoing androgen ablationherapy for prostate cancer. J Urol999;162:98-102.9. Preskorn SH. Comparison of the tolerabilityf bupropion, fluoxetine, imipramine, nefaz-done, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine.
Clin Psychiatr 1995;56(suppl):12-21.rican Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 105
7Kit7Gbc7pO7pm7mmG7mO7wfl7am17Ep57ObhCs
8pndJ8pb18Oflo18aidn8fflF8opap68VmG8dfh
8Vdm18for9Po9EhT9op9aM9Khv69aic89eM9m
Reviews General Gynecology www.AJOG.org
1
0. Guttuso T Jr, Kurlan R, McDermott MP,ieburtz K. Gabapentin’s effects on hot flashes
n postmenopausal women: a randomized con-rolled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:337-45.1. Pandya KJ, Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, et al.abapentin for hot flashes in 420 women withreast cancer: a randomised double-blind pla-ebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:818-24.2. Stearns V, Loprinzi CL. New therapeutic ap-roaches for hot flashes in women. J Supportncol 2003;1:11-21.3. Clayden JR, Bell JW, Pollard P. Meno-ausal flushing: double-blind trial of a non-hor-onal medication. BMJ 1974;1:409-12.4. Nagamani M, Kelver ME, Smith ER. Treat-ent of menopausal hot flashes with transder-al administration of clonidine. Am J Obstetynecol 1987;156:561-5.5. Salmi T, Punnonen R. Clonidine in the treat-ent of menopausal symptoms. Int J Gynaecolbstet 1979;16:422-6.6. Wren BG, Brown LB. A double-blind trialith clonidine and a placebo to treat hot
ushes. Med J Aust 1986;144:369-70.7. Goldberg RM, Loprinzi CL, O’Fallon JR, etl. Transdermal clonidine for ameliorating ta-oxifen-induced hot flashes. J Clin Oncol994;12:155-8.8. Laufer LR, Erlik Y, Meldrum DR, Judd HL.ffect of clonidine on hot flashes in postmeno-ausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:83-6.9. Pandya KJ, Raubertas RF, Flynn PJ, et al.ral clonidine in postmenopausal patients withreast cancer experiencing tamoxifen-inducedot flashes: a University of Rochester Cancerenter Community Clinical Oncology Program
tudy. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:788-93. v06 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
0. Fujimura A, Ebihara A, Ohashi K, et al. Com-arison of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacody-amics, and safety of oral (Catapres) and trans-ermal (M-5041T) clonidine in healthy subjects.Clin Pharmacol 1994;34:260-5.1. Nesheim BI, Saetre T. Reduction of meno-ausal hot flushes by methyldopa: a doublelind crossover trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol981;20:413-6.2. Andersen O, Engebretsen T, Solberg VM,rbo A. Alpha-methyldopa for climacteric hot
ushes: a double-blind, randomized, cross-ver study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand986;65:405-9.3. Morgante G, Farina M, Cianci A, et al. Ver-lipride administered in combination with ralox-
fene decreases hot flushes and improves boneensity in early postmenopausal women. Gy-ecol Endocrinol 2004;18:194-8.4. Vercellini P, Sacerdote P, Trespidi L, Man-
redi B, Panerai AE, Crosignani PG. Veraliprideor hot flushes induced by a gonadotropin-re-easing hormone agonist: a controlled study.ertil Steril 1994;62:938-42.5. Melis GB, Gambacciani M, Cagnacci A, Pa-letti AM, Mais V, Fioretti P. Effects of the do-amine antagonist veralipride on hot flushesnd luteinizing hormone secretion in postmeno-ausal women. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:88-92.6. David A, Don R,Tajchner G, Weissglas L.eralipride: alternative antidopaminergic treat-ent for menopausal symptoms. Am J Obstetynecol 1988;158:1107-15.7. Vercellini P, Vendola N, Colombo A, Passa-ore C, Trespidi L, Crosignani PG. Veralipride
or hot flushes during gonadotropin-releasingormone agonist treatment. Gynecol Obstet In-
est 1992;34:102-4. MFEBRUARY 2007
8. Wesel S, Bourguignon RP, Bosuma WB.eralipride versus conjugated oestrogens: aouble-blind study in the management ofenopausal hot flushes. Curr Med Res Opin984;8:696-700.9. Zichella L, Falaschi P, Fioretti P, et al. Ef-
ects of different dopamine agonists and antag-nists on post-menopausal hot flushes. Matu-itas 1986;8:229-37.0. Perez DG, Loprinzi CL, Barton DL, et al.ilot evaluation of mirtazapine for the treatmentf hot flashes. J Support Oncol 2004;2:50-6.1. Tarim E, Bagis T, Kilicdag E, Erkanli S, Aslan, Kuscu E. Moclobemide in the treatment ofot flashes in postmenopausal women. Advher 2002;19:258-65.2. Coope J, Williams S, Patterson JS. A studyf the effectiveness of propranolol in meno-ausal hot flushes. BJOG 1978;85:472-5.3. Loprinzi CL, Stearns V, Barton D. Centrallyctive nonhormonal hot flash therapies. Am Jed 2005;118(suppl):118-23.4. Plouffe L Jr, Trott EA, Largoza M, HansenA. An open trial of sertraline for menopausalot flushes: potential involvement of serotonin inasomotor instability. Del Med J 1997;9:481-2.5. Pandya KJ, Thummala AR, Griggs JJ, etl. Pilot study using gabapentin for tamoxifen-
nduced hot flashes in women with breastancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;83:7-9.6. Loprinzi L, Barton DL, Sloan JA, et al. Pilotvaluation of gabapentin for treating hot flashes.ayo Clin Proc 2002;77:1159-63.7. Lindsay R, Hart DM. Failure of response ofenopausal vasomotor symptoms to clonidine.
aturitas 1978;1:21-5.