united states district court united states … · united states district court district of...

104
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. BRIAN AUGUSTINE JOYCE Criminal No. 17-CR- Violations: 18 U.S.C. §§ 371; 666; 1341; 1343; 1346; 1951; 1956; 1957; 1962(c); and 2; 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C); 982(a)(1); 1963 and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) INDICTMENT THE GRAND JURY charges: COUNT ONE (Racketeering -18 U.S.C. § 1962(c)) At all times relevant to this Indictment, The Enterprise 1. The Massachusetts State Senate consists of 40 members, with each Senator elected to represent a district consisting of approximately 100,000 to 200,000 people. The Massachusetts Constitution requires the Senate to meet on a regular basis to consider legislation. 2. The Norfolk, Bristol, and Plymouth Senate district of Massachusetts consists of ten towns: the towns of Avon, Braintree (four precincts). Canton, Milton, Randolph, Sharon (two precincts), and Stoughton, in the county of Norfolk; the town of Easton (four precincts) in the county of Bristol; and the towns of East Bridgewater (one precinct) and West Bridgewater in the county of Plymouth. 3. From approximately 1998 to 2017, Brian Augustine Joyce, a Milton resident, was the elected State Senator for the Norfolk, Bristol, and Plymouth district (the "District"). As State Senator, Joyce represented the interests of the District, as well as the Commonwealth, on a regular Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 102

Upload: trantram

Post on 23-Aug-2018

237 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

V.

BRIAN AUGUSTINE JOYCE

Criminal No. 17-CR-

Violations: 18 U.S.C. §§ 371; 666; 1341;1343; 1346; 1951; 1956; 1957; 1962(c); and2; 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C); 982(a)(1);1963 and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c)

INDICTMENT

THE GRAND JURY charges:

COUNT ONE

(Racketeering -18 U.S.C. § 1962(c))

At all times relevant to this Indictment,

The Enterprise

1. The Massachusetts State Senate consists of40 members, with each Senator elected

to represent a district consisting ofapproximately 100,000 to 200,000 people. The Massachusetts

Constitution requires the Senate to meet on a regular basis to consider legislation.

2. The Norfolk, Bristol, and Plymouth Senate district ofMassachusetts consists often

towns: the towns of Avon, Braintree (four precincts). Canton, Milton, Randolph, Sharon (two

precincts), and Stoughton, in the county of Norfolk; the town of Easton (four precincts) in the

county of Bristol; and the towns of East Bridgewater (one precinct) and West Bridgewater in the

county of Plymouth.

3. From approximately 1998 to 2017, Brian Augustine Joyce, a Milton resident, was

the elected State Senator for the Norfolk, Bristol, and Plymouth district (the "District"). As State

Senator, Joyce represented the interests ofthe District, as well as the Commonwealth, on a regular

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 2 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 3 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 4 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 5 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 6 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 7 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 8 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 9 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 10 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 11 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 12 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 13 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 14 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 15 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 16 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 17 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 18 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 19 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 20 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 21 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 22 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 23 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 24 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 25 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 26 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 27 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 28 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 29 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 30 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 31 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 32 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 33 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 34 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 35 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 36 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 37 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 38 of 102

Town Manager, intending that such advice would form the basis for an official act by the Randolph

Town Manager, which official acts included the appointment of the Energy Broker Company as

the exclusive energy consultant for the Town ofRandolph, and the Town of Randolph's approval

ofan energy contract that was brokered by the Energy Broker Company, as specific opportunities

arose, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1951(a) and 2.

#1C. From in or about early 2011 through 2014, in the District ofMassachusetts and

elsewhere, the defendant, BRIAN AUGUSTINE JOYCE, did conspire to obstruct, delay, and

affect interstate commerce and the movement ofany article and commodity in interstate commerce

by extortion under color ofofficial right - that is, by agreeing to obtain a stream ofpayments from

the Energy Broker Company, with its consent, in exchange for defendant Joyce's official action,

which included using his official position to exert pressure on the Randolph Town Manager to

perform an official act, and using his official position to advise the Randolph Town Manager,

intending that such advice would form the basis for an official act by the Randolph Town Manager,

which official acts included the appointment of the Energy Broker Company as the exclusive

energy consultant for the Town of Randolph, and the Town of Randolph's approval of an energy

contract that was brokered by the Energy Broker Company, as specific opportunities arose, in

violation ofTitle 18, United States Code, Section 1951(a).

39

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 39 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 40 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 41 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 42 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 43 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 44 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 45 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 46 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 47 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 48 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 49 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 50 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 51 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 52 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 53 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 54 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 55 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 56 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 57 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 58 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 59 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 60 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 61 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 62 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 63 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 64 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 65 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 66 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 67 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 68 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 69 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 70 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 71 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 72 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 73 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 74 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 75 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 76 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 77 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 78 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 79 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 80 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 81 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 82 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 83 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 84 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 85 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 86 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 87 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 88 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 89 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 90 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 91 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 92 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 93 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 94 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 95 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 96 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 97 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 98 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 99 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 100 of 102

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 101 of 102

A TRUE BILL

FOREPERSON OF THE GRAND JURY

DUSTIN CHAO

WILLIAM F. BLOOMER

ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEYS

U.S. DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS; December 7, 2017.Returned into the District Court by the Grand Jurors and filed.

DEPUTY ^LERK

102

^ r. 10 pi<^

i2-hln

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3 Filed 12/07/17 Page 102 of 102

45 (5/97) - (RevisedU.S.D.C. MA 3/25/2011)

Criminal Case Cover Sheet U.S. District Court - District of Massachusetts

Place of Offense:

City Greater Boston

CategoryNo. J

n Related Case Information:

Investigating Agency ™

County Suffolk Superseding Ind./ Inf.Same Defendant

Case No.New Defendant

Magistrate Judge Case NumberSearch Warrant Case Number 17-MJ-4166-DHHR 20/R 40 from District of

Defendant Information:

Defendant Name Brian Augustine Joyce Juvenile:

Is this person an attorney and/or a member of any state/federal bar:

• Yes No

0 Yes • NoAlias Name

Address rCitv&State^ Westport,MA

Birth date (Yr only): 1962 SSN (last4#): 9148 Sex ^

Defense Counsel if known: Howard M. Cooper

Bar Number

U.S. Attorney Information:

AUSA Dustin Chao

Race: White Nationality: U'S»A.

Address Todd&Weld

One Federal Street, 27th Floor

Boston, MA 02110

Bar Number ifapplicable

Interpreter: • Yes [3 No List language and/or dialect:

Victims: •y es 0No Ifyes, are there multiple crime victims under 18 USC§3771(d)(2) • Yes • No

Matter to be SEALED: {7} Yes • No

(^Warrant Requested Q Regular Process In Custody

Location Status:

Arrest Date

I [Already inFederal Custody as ofI [Already in State Custody at•on Pretrial Release: Ordered by:

Charging Document: I IComplaint I IInformation

Total #of Counts: | |Petty I IMisdemeanor

Continue on Page 2 for Entry ofU.S.C. Citations

0 I hereby certify that the case numbers of any prior proceedings before aMagistrate Judge areaccurately set forth above.

Date: 12/07/2017 • Signature ofAUSA:

m

I Serving Sentenceon

I Kwaiting Trial

0 Indictment

F/l Felony —

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3-1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:17-cr-10378-NMG Document 3-1 Filed 12/07/17 Page 2 of 2