tsgt brent whitby ncoic, quality assurance 375 medical group, scott afb, il

55
TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Upload: baby-medland

Post on 14-Dec-2015

224 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

TSgt Brent WhitbyNCOIC, Quality Assurance

375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Page 2: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Let’s Draw a Pig

Page 3: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

AFSO21 Implementation Linking AFSO21 to Organizational Goals OODA Loop process of AFSO21

Page 4: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Launched in 2005 Obstacles to deployment

◦ Quality Air Force Conundrum◦ Senior Leadership buy-in

AFSO21 vs. QAF◦ Value stream mapping vs. process mapping◦ Results

Page 5: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

5

Assess outlook/future path◦ Current state map◦ Future state map

Evaluate current organizational performance Review system change/improvement

capacity

Page 6: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

6

Which process needs the most attention Where can biggest cost savings occur How can quality be improved (to what

degree?)

Page 7: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Customers are important Speed, quality, low cost are linked Variation/defects minimized Time trap elimination Data driven improvements Teamwork

Page 8: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

8

Q1 - Immediate attention

Q2 - Hardest decision Q3 - Sometimes

beneficial Q4 - Avoid

1 2

3 4

High

Low

Low High

Benefit

Effort

Page 9: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Process elements Stakeholder analysis Customer data Quality function deployment Benchmarking

Page 10: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Supplier (provide inputs) Input (services provided) Process (value added steps) Output (final product) Customer (internal/external)

Suppliers Inputs Process Output Customer

MLTs Perform Test Verify Patient Acceptable Specimen to analyze

Patient

Patients Provide Specimens Accession Test Accurate Results

Physician

Phlebotomist Collect specimens Collect Sample Timely treatment

Technical Supervisor Report Results Process Sample

Physician Put on Analyzer

Report Results

Page 11: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Control resistance (reduce or remove)◦ Provide alternatives◦ Remove pitfalls◦ Ensure buy-in

Perceived value drives feedback ◦ Positive ◦ Negative

Page 12: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Use Service Delivery Assessment data (customers define quality/expectation)

Listen to external/internal customers◦ WoW Forms◦ Internal customer surveys

CQFA◦ Cost◦ Quality◦ Features◦ Availability

Page 13: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Often referred as “Voice of Customer” House of Quality

◦ Customer needs◦ Design features/technical requirements◦ Customer priorities◦ Benchmarking (targeted values)◦ Inter-relationship between design features

Page 14: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Types◦ Process◦ Performance◦ Project◦ Strategic

Sequence◦ Determine current practices◦ ID best practices◦ Analyze best practices◦ Model best practices◦ Repeat

Page 15: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL
Page 16: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL
Page 17: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Originated by Col John Boyd (USAF)

◦ Also known as Decision Cycle

Four Overlapping and Interacting Processes

◦ Observe Unfolding

Circumstances and Information

◦ Orient Analysis and Synthesis

◦ Decide◦ Act (and Test)

Page 18: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

1. Clarify The Problem

2. Break Down The Problem/Identify Performance Gaps

3. Set Improvement Target

4. Determine Root Causes

5. Develop Countermeasures

6. See Countermeasures Through

7. Confirm Results & Process

8.Standardize Successful Processes

Observe

Orient

Decide

Act

Plan

Act

Check

Do

Page 19: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Logical Thinking Process Objectivity Focus on Results and Processes Synthesis, distillation, and visualization Alignment Coherence & Consistency Systems Viewpoint

Page 20: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Strong emphasis on cause and effect Focuses organization to maximize

resources by focusing on the “critical few” Minimizes wasted time by management

by using a robust problem solving process

Page 21: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Process drives employees to think with quantitative data as opposed to emotion and opinions

Fosters a collaborative process as opposed to a “silo mentality”

Page 22: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Example:Insurance company is losing business due to

5 day turnaround on quotes.

Possible Solutions:1. Hire more people to reduce time2. Incentivize employees to work harder3. Find the root cause for lengthy

turnaround and implement permanent corrective action

Page 23: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Minimizes “Death by PowerPoint” Forces brevity and clarity Only most vital points used for proper

understanding Utilizes graphs, pictures, and sketches to

promote understanding (visualization)

Page 24: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

3D Communication◦ Up and down the hierarchy◦ Horizontally across the organization◦ Back and forth in time

Heavy emphasis on consensus decision making

Page 25: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Avoids: Tackling problems that are not important

to organizational goals Solutions that do not address root

cause(s) Incomplete implementation plans Omission of follow up plans and standard

work

Page 26: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

The impact of the proposed solution must not adversely impact other parts of the organization (i.e. transferring a problem from one department to another)

The good of the whole organization takes clear precedence over the individual departments

Page 27: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

27

SA&DSWOTVoice of CustomerVSMGo & See

KPI/MetricsPerformance Gap AnalysisBottleneck Analysis

Ideal StateFuture State MappingB-SMART

BrainstormingParetoAffinityFishboneControl Charts

A3Action PlansTimelinesFinancial Reporting Template

6S & Visual MgtStandard WorkCell Design / Variation ReductionError ProofingQuick ChangeoverTPM RIE

KPIs/MetricsPerformance MgtSA&DStandard Work Audit

Checkpoints / Standardization Tbl Report Out Theme StoryBroad ImplementationCPI Mgt Tool

Page 28: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

1. Clarify the Problem◦ Strategic Alignment and

Deployment◦ Voice of Customer◦ Value Stream Mapping◦ Go & See

2. Break Down the Problem and Identify Performance Gaps◦ Key Process Indicators / Metrics◦ SWOT◦ Performance Gap Analysis◦ Bottleneck Analysis

OODA

Page 29: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Strategic Alignment & Deployment (SA&D)◦ Ensuring that activities are linked to the key

strategies and directives of the organization Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats

(SWOT) Analysis◦ Assessing the organization from a SWOT perspective

to identify areas of need◦ Needs to be rolled into SA&D at appropriate levels

Voice of Customer (VOC)◦ Understanding who the customer is and what they

need from the process or problem area Value Stream Mapping (VSM)

◦ Overview of Process to determine areas of needed focus

Go & See◦ Determine issues by actually walking the process or

problem area (Gemba or Genchi Genbutsu)

OODA

Page 30: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

1. Does this problem, when solved, help meet needs identified by the organization?

◦ Is it linked to the SA&D of organization?◦ Does it help satisfy customer needs (VOC)?

2. Does this problem, when solved, address key issues identified during SWOT analysis?

3. Has this problem been identified and directed by a Value Stream Map at the appropriate level?

◦ What does the “Future State” need?◦ What resources have been identified to address

this issue?4. What opportunities were identified or observed by

the process or problem area “walk”?◦ Will addressing or improving these issues deliver

results that relate to #1 or #2?◦ Will addressing or improving this problem deliver

the desired future state from #3?16

OODA

Page 31: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA Gather and Review Key Process Indicators and Metrics◦ Problem Solving and Process Improvement begin

with Data◦ Understanding what data is necessary and what the

data means is critical to true “root cause” problem solving

Performance Gap Analysis◦ Once data has been gathered, analyzing the gap

between the current state and the desired state directs efforts

Bottleneck Analysis◦ Bottlenecks are inhibitors to the flow of the process◦ Understanding bottlenecks (TOC) is critical to flow

Page 32: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

1. Does the problem require more analysis or does leadership have enough information to execute a solution?

◦ Is this simply a leadership directive?2. If more data is needed, how do we

measure performance now?◦ What are the Key Performance

Indicators (KPI)?◦ What is the performance gap?

3. Does other “non-existent” data need to be gathered?

4. What does the data indicate are the potential root causes?

5. Does the data review indicate a bottleneck or constraint?

OODA

Page 33: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Ideal State Map◦ Brainstorming “Could-Be” without

constraints Future State Mapping

◦ “Vision” of Future for Process B - SMART Action Plan

◦ Balanced◦ Specific◦ Measurable◦ Action Oriented◦ Results Oriented◦ Time-based

OODA

Page 34: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Target characteristics◦ Must be measurable, concrete,

challenging and achievable Statement of a Target

◦ Do what: (examples include “decrease ____?”, “increase ____?”, eliminate ____?, reduce ____?)

◦ By how much: (measured in the same terms as the standard)

◦ By when: (specific date) Must be output oriented

◦ Things to be achieved, not things to do

OODA

Page 35: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

1. Is the Improvement Target measurable?2. Is it Concrete?3. Is it Challenging?4. Is the Target “Output Oriented”?

◦ What is the desired output?◦ Should be “things to achieve”◦ Should avoid “things to do”

– Will be addressed by Action Plans in “Develop Countermeasure”

5. The desired target should:◦ Do What?◦ By How Much?◦ By When?

6. If it is a Process Problem, what is the future state?◦ How will it be realized?

OODA

Page 36: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Root Cause Characteristics◦ The root cause is the most likely source of the

discrepancy or greatest possible improvement target

◦ The root cause can be dealt with directly and a countermeasure can be planned to address it

◦ If root cause is addressed, it will address the performance gap

◦ The root cause must be verified by “go and see”Determining the Root Cause is easier with Data

OODA

Page 37: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA Tools for Step 4◦ 5 Whys◦ Brainstorming◦ Pareto Analysis◦ Affinity Diagrams◦ Fishbone Diagrams (also called Cause & Effect)◦ Control Charts

Additional Data Gathering Tools◦ Check Sheets, Chonbo Charts, Scatter Diagrams

Page 38: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

1. What root cause analysis tools are necessary?◦ Why are these tools necessary?◦ What benefit will be gained by using them?◦ Who will need to be involved in the root cause analysis?

– 10 heads are better than one– Remember “cultural” issues related to problem

2. What is (are) the root cause(s) according to the tools?3. How will the root cause be addressed?4. Will addressing these address the performance gap?5. Can the problem be turned on or off by addressing the root

cause?6. Does the root cause make sense if the problem solving 5

Whys are worked in reverse?◦ Working in reverse, say “therefore” between each of the

“whys”

OODA

Page 39: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

Decide Stage – Develop Countermeasures◦ A3 Problem Solving and Reporting Format

Common Structure and Concise Reporting◦ Action Plans

SMART Action Items◦ Timelines & Project Management

Managing complex Problem Solving in a project fashion

◦ FM Tool Understanding the impact of the improvements

Page 40: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

Develop potential countermeasures◦ Tools and philosophies from Lean, TOC, 6 Sigma

and BPR as appropriate Select the most practical and effective

countermeasures Build consensus with others by involving all

stakeholders appropriately◦ Communicate, communicate, communicate

Create clear and detailed action plan◦ SMART Actions◦ Reference Facilitation Techniques as appropriate

Page 41: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

Process Improvement Philosophies◦ Lean, TOC, 6 Sigma, BPR

Lean and Process Improvement Tools◦ 6-S & Visual Management◦ Standard Work◦ Cell Design◦ Variation Reduction◦ Error Proofing◦ Quick Changeover◦ Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)◦ Rapid Improvement Events (RIE)

Page 42: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

Which philosophy best prescribes tools that address root cause(s)?

Which tools best address root cause(s)? Which method for implementation fits the

tool and improvement need?◦ Rapid Improvement Event?◦ Improvement Project?◦ Point Improvement or “Just Do It”?

If RIE or Project, create “Charter” and communicate

What training or education is needed? By Whom?

Page 43: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

1. How are we performing relative to the Observe phase (Steps 1 & 2)?

2. How are we performing relative to Step 3?3. How are we performing relative to FM Tool

projections?4. If we are not meeting targets, do we need to

return to OODA Step #4?◦ Most problem solving “breakdowns” occur relative

to improper root cause identification

Page 44: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

Checkpoints and Standardization Tables Report-out Storyboards Board Implementation Capture Results in Powersteering Sharing of Results

◦ Communication of Best Practices Restart OODA Loop

Page 45: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

1. What is needed to Standardize Improvements?◦ Tech Order changes?◦ Air Force Instruction changes?◦ Official Instruction changes?

2. How should improvements and lessons learned be communicated?◦ Powersteering◦ Key meetings?

3. Were other opportunities or problems identified by the Problem Solving Process?◦ Restart OODA Loop

Page 46: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

Checkpoints and Standardization Tables Report-out Storyboards Board Implementation Capture Results in Powersteering Sharing of Results

◦ Communication of Best Practices Restart OODA Loop

Page 47: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

OODA

1. What is needed to Standardize Improvements?◦ Tech Order changes?◦ Air Force Instruction changes?◦ Official Instruction changes?

2. How should improvements and lessons learned be communicated?◦ Powersteering◦ Key meetings?

3. Were other opportunities or problems identified by the Problem Solving Process?◦ Restart OODA Loop

Page 48: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Problem Solving Process & Related Toolsets SA&D SWOT Voice of Customer Value Stream Mapping Go & See

Page 49: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

KPI/Metrics Performance Gap Analysis Bottleneck Analysis

Page 50: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Ideal State Future State Mapping B-SMART

Page 51: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

5 Whys Brainstorming Pareto Affinity Fishbone Control Charts

Page 52: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

6S & Visual Management Standard Work Cell Design Variation Reduction Error Proofing Quick Changeover TPM RIE

Page 53: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

KPIs & Metrics Performance Management SA&D Standard Work

Page 54: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Checkpoints & Standardization Table Report Out theme Story Board Implementation Powersteering Start OODA

Page 55: TSgt Brent Whitby NCOIC, Quality Assurance 375 Medical Group, Scott AFB, IL

Effective Problem Solving must follow the Observe, Orient, Decide and Act process

Following OODA ensures actions will result in desired results

Following OODA ensures results will meet the needs of the organization

Meeting the needs of the organization will lead to a stronger Air Force (Culturally as well)

A stronger Air Force leads to a Safer Country!