true inquiry flawed inquiry - model teaching · true inquiry flawed inquiry ... promotes curiosity...

1
INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING: Can You Identify What True Inquiry Looks Like? True Inquiry Flawed Inquiry Back & Forth Flow of Knowledge One Directional Flow of Knowledge • Teacher poses an idea or concept and asks targeted questions which leads to students sharing ideas and asking additional questions • Teacher responds with additional thought-provoking questions that encourage students to investigate on their own and analyze their findings • Students build on and defend new explanations and understandings based on evidence • Teacher poses an idea or concept and asks specific questions • Teacher provides direct resources or learning activities from which the answers to the questions can be found • Students complete the activity or research and present the answer to the question with little or no higher level thinking Teacher as a Facilitator Teacher as an Instructor • Teacher prompts student questioning and idea sharing with purposeful questions • Teacher ensures that students have access to the resources as they determine what they need • Teacher sets expectations but students are held accountable for their own actions • Teacher lectures and does not encourage communication and questioning • Teacher provides resources • Teacher strictly monitors and micromanages student behavior Student Ownership No Buy-In From Students • Student ownership increases when students are given meaningful tasks that are engaging and challenging. • Accountability also increases when students are part of a cooper- ative group and others are depending on them. • No sense of ownership when they have no choice in how to inves- tigate a problem • Students working independently have no one depending on them and therefore not much incentive to perform beyond minimum expectations Promotes Curiosity and Creativity Stifles Curiosity and Creativity • Students’ natural curiosity is piqued in true inquiry as they explore a concept and ask their own questions to further understand what they are learning • Students are encouraged to think outside the box and creatively test their theories • Implies that students’ questions are irrelevant, and they only need to focus on what is in the textbook or taught by the teacher • Little to no opportunities for creative thinking Prepares Students for Future Challenges and Roles Limits Students in Their Thinking • Students learn valuable 21st century skills such as creativity, collaboration, perseverance, and problem solving • Authentic work is representative of what adults do in the real world • Mimics the adult thinking process of analyzing an idea, breaking it into manageable parts, and seeking comprehension of each part to build a conceptual understanding • No opportunity to practice 21st century skills through “sit and get” learning • Work has no authentic purpose • Higher order thinking skills are not involved, only rote knowledge and comprehension questions Wide Range of Resources Limited Resources • In addition to books and online resources, students consult experts or conduct their own investigations • Students use the resources to explore their ideas • Research is limited to books and online sources • Students use the resources by following a plan already built by the teacher Increased Opportunities for Communication Limited Communication • Students must communicate their needs and offer progress updates • Students may present their findings verbally, in writing, or through a media presentation • Communication is limited to written work or perhaps asking questions by the teacher Rigorous Questions and Activities Low-Level Questions & Activities • Questions increase in rigor to include upper level Bloom’s Taxonomy such as synthesis and evaluation • Activities reach levels 2 through 4 of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (Working with Skills and Concepts, Short-Term Strategic Thinking, and Extended Strategic Thinking) • Students practice their critical thinking by planning their own investigations using the experimental design process • Questions are oſten limited to knowledge and comprehension • Activities are oſten limited to level one in Webb’s Depth of Knowledge • Students complete a task or activity by following step-by- step instructions, with little to no higher-level thinking www.ModelTeaching.com | [email protected] | 888.828.7950 Model Teaching Professional Development Courses

Upload: others

Post on 05-Jun-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING:Can You Identify What True Inquiry Looks Like?

True Inquiry Flawed Inquiry

Back & Forth Flow of Knowledge One Directional Flow of Knowledge

• Teacher poses an idea or concept and asks targeted questions which leads to students sharing ideas and asking additional questions

• Teacher responds with additional thought-provoking questions that encourage students to investigate on their own and analyze their �ndings

• Students build on and defend new explanations and understandings based on evidence

• Teacher poses an idea or concept and asks speci�c questions

• Teacher provides direct resources or learning activities from which the answers to the questions can be found

• Students complete the activity or research and present the answer to the question with little or no higher level thinking

Teacher as a Facilitator Teacher as an Instructor

• Teacher prompts student questioning and idea sharing with purposeful questions

• Teacher ensures that students have access to the resources as they determine what they need

• Teacher sets expectations but students are held accountable for their own actions

• Teacher lectures and does not encourage communication and questioning

• Teacher provides resources

• Teacher strictly monitors and micromanages student behavior

Student Ownership No Buy-In From Students

• Student ownership increases when students are given meaningful tasks that are engaging and challenging.

• Accountability also increases when students are part of a cooper-ative group and others are depending on them.

• No sense of ownership when they have no choice in how to inves-tigate a problem

• Students working independently have no one depending on them and therefore not much incentive to perform beyond minimum expectations

Promotes Curiosity and Creativity Sti�es Curiosity and Creativity

• Students’ natural curiosity is piqued in true inquiry as they explore a concept and ask their own questions to further understand what they are learning

• Students are encouraged to think outside the box and creatively test their theories

• Implies that students’ questions are irrelevant, and they only need to focus on what is in the textbook or taught by the teacher

• Little to no opportunities for creative thinking

Prepares Students for Future Challenges and Roles

Limits Students in Their Thinking

• Students learn valuable 21st century skills such as creativity, collaboration, perseverance, and problem solving

• Authentic work is representative of what adults do in the real world

• Mimics the adult thinking process of analyzing an idea, breaking it into manageable parts, and seeking comprehension of each part to build a conceptual understanding

• No opportunity to practice 21st century skills through “sit and get” learning

• Work has no authentic purpose

• Higher order thinking skills are not involved, only rote knowledge and comprehension questions

Wide Range of Resources Limited Resources

• In addition to books and online resources, students consult experts or conduct their own investigations

• Students use the resources to explore their ideas

• Research is limited to books and online sources

• Students use the resources by following a plan already built by the teacher

Increased Opportunities for Communication

Limited Communication

• Students must communicate their needs and o�er progress updates

• Students may present their �ndings verbally, in writing, or through a media presentation

• Communication is limited to written work or perhaps asking questions by the teacher

Rigorous Questions and Activities Low-Level Questions & Activities

• Questions increase in rigor to include upper level Bloom’s Taxonomy such as synthesis and evaluation

• Activities reach levels 2 through 4 of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (Working with Skills and Concepts, Short-Term Strategic Thinking, and Extended Strategic Thinking)

• Students practice their critical thinking by planning their own investigations using the experimental design process

• Questions are o�en limited to knowledge and comprehension

• Activities are o�en limited to level one in Webb’s Depth of Knowledge

• Students complete a task or activity by following step-by-step instructions, with little to no higher-level thinking

www.ModelTeaching.com | [email protected] | 888.828.7950Model Teaching Professional Development Courses