troubled assets relief program

19
TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF PROGRAM

Upload: infinity-business-school

Post on 19-Jan-2015

1.645 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF PROGRAM

Page 2: Troubled Assets Relief Program

WHAT IS TARP?

Emergency stabilization act , 3rd Oct 2008 To bail out the economy from the financial crisis Gave the US treasury USD 700 Billion purchasing power USD 250+USD100 Bn immediately released to treasury Next USD 350 Bn - Congress approval needed To buy Mortgage Backed Securities To un seize the money market To create liquidity

Page 3: Troubled Assets Relief Program

SUBPRIME CRISIS

Page 4: Troubled Assets Relief Program

OBJECTIVE & OUTCOME

Purchase assets and equity from financial institutions to strengthen its financial sector To address the instability caused by subprime mortgage crisis. Allows the Treasury to purchase illiquid assets from banks and other financial institutions To purchase CDS, which were sold in a booming market until 2007 Finance main street- Making Home affordable Program- Help families stay in their homes =TARP was eventually getting Wall Street back on its feet; it is not meeting its goal of getting Main Street back on its feet Result: 'Too-big-to-fail' banks grow even bigger

Page 5: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP RECIPIENTS

Page 6: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP FUNDS

TARP funds were issued through:Purchase of preferred stock in banks  which is redeemablePurchase of equity capitalIssue of guarantees

Page 7: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP AND GOVERNMENT

TARP became an act under president G.W. Bush President Barack Obama (Jan ‘09) said that he intended to "fundamentally change some of the practices" in the bailout program He said, "Many of us have been disappointed with the absence of clarity, the failure to track how the money's been spent.“

In Feb 2010 he planned Congress to transfer TARP funds that have been paid back from the Wall Street banks to a new program "to provide capital for community banks on Main Street which deal more closely with the small businesses“

Page 8: Troubled Assets Relief Program

HENRY HANK PAULSON Served as the 74th United States Treasury Secretary,previously the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman SachsInfluenced the decision to create a credit facility of US$85 billion to AIG to avoid filing bankruptcy Paulson's plan potentially had conflicts of interest The Goldman Sachs benefit from AIG bailout was recently estimated as USD 12.9 billion and Goldman Sachs was the largest recipient of the public funds from AIG

TARP- US TREASURY SECTRTARIES - GOLDMAN SACHS

Page 9: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP- US TREASURY SECTRTARIES - GOLDMAN SACHS

TIMOTHY GEITHNER 75th and current US Treasury Secretary Directed the Federal Government's spending on the financial crisis of ’07 – ’10, allocation of $350 billion TARP funds In Mar’08,supporting role to Henry Paulson, in decision to bail out AIG 2 days after deciding not to rescue Lehman Brothers from bankruptcy.   contributed to worsening the global financial crisis

TARP- US TREASURY SECTRTARIES - GOLDMAN SACHSTARP- US TREASURY SECTRTARIES - GOLDMAN SACHS

Page 10: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF

PROGRAM

Page 11: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP & AIG & GOLDMAN SACHS

AIG : US’s largest insurance company and the world’s leading issuer of credit default swaps Collapsed in September 2008-high leverage, high exposure to CDS Received-USD 180 bn under TARP in installmentsGoldman got $4.8 billion from AIG's securities lending unitAnd AIG posted $2.5 billion in collateral to Goldman , which came directly from TARP according to AIG's own list of what it did with its bailout money

Page 12: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP & AIG & GOLDMAN SACHS

It got twice as much as any other American bank, the Fed's "special purpose vehicle" that it created to unwind AIG's credit default swaps AIG bailout turned out to be a scam. AIG executives - ($165 million) in bonuses Billions of taxpayer dollars paid to the counter- parties of AIG’s financial deals It still owes a combined total of $62 billion to the Fed and the Treasury

Page 13: Troubled Assets Relief Program

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED …

Page 14: Troubled Assets Relief Program

IS TARP ONLY A FAILURE? MAY BE NOT!

Failure to the purpose it was set for

Success: managed to lift the face of the economy TARP repayments had reached a total of $240 billion,Net outstanding $110 billion Taxpayers have also received a further return on TARP investments of $23 billion through dividends, interest, and other incomeOverall combined TARP revenues totaled $217 billion through the end of May 2010The US Fed has made huge profits through purchase of equity capital 80% of AIG is owned by the US Fed.

Page 15: Troubled Assets Relief Program

BANKS PAYING UP

Tarp was suppose to strengthen the balance sheet of the banks for long run stability Banks paid up to get free from restrictions by fed govt on tarp recipientsTo free themselves of salary caps Paid by offering loans which beats the objective

Page 16: Troubled Assets Relief Program

TARP REPAYMENS

Page 17: Troubled Assets Relief Program

PROS CONS

Signals strength and avoids competitive disadvantages

It’s relatively cheap capital

Reduces government influence on governance and management

Replacement capital may be more expensive and dilutive

Eliminates TARP-related compensation restrictions

Continued economic weakness could result in unanticipated need to raise capital after TARP repayment

It might be advisable to do it now before conditions to repayment are changed

Compensation practices will continue to be scrutinized and perhaps regulated even after TARP repayment

TARP REPAYMENT – SELECTED PROS AND CONSTARP REPAYMENS BY BANKS

PROS CONS

Signals strength and avoids competitive disadvantages

It’s relatively cheap capital

Reduces government influence on governance and management

Replacement capital may be more expensive and dilutive

Eliminates TARP-related compensation restrictions

Continued economic weakness could result in unanticipated need to raise capital after TARP repayment

It might be advisable to do it now before conditions to repayment are changed

Compensation practices will continue to be scrutinized and perhaps regulated even after TARP repayment

Page 18: Troubled Assets Relief Program

IS TARP ONLY A FAILURE? MAY BE NOT!

CRITICISM

Privatization of profits and socialisation of losses

Page 19: Troubled Assets Relief Program

PRESENTED BY:

KARAN CHAWLAHARIT PAHWAKETAN SARAFRASHMI BHATIATARU JAINSUKRITI KUMAR