troan - advanced industries article 10 2014
TRANSCRIPT
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
THE LABOR FACTOR Advanced Industries' Reliance Upon A Highly Skilled Workforce
A COMPLEX BUSINESS PARADIGM Tech Companies Partnering With Host Communities
Fall 2014
2014
Ad\·anced industries have been described
by the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program
and McKinsey & Company as "the nation's most
strategic inno\·ation and STEM (science, technology,
engineering, and math) worker-intensive industries
(that are) prime movers of regional and national
prosperity in developed countries." Brookings and
McKinsey have further identified 23 sectors with
above-average R&D investment as being advanced
industries. Among these are the automotive and
aerospace industries, including related suppliers,
which we have chosen to focus on in this special
publication.
We first look at the need for skilled labor in
advanced industries, which are working to close
the skills gap through internships and co-op and
training programs. They are working with the
states and communities in which they are located
and utilizing local educational resources. They are
partnering with their host communities in other
ways as well, in order to grow in place, benefiting
from tax abatements, exemptions, and rebates,
as well as training and other incenth·es. A closer
look at the auto industry, in particular, reveals its
geographic spread and how new lightweighting
technologies are leading to further industry
investment.
The articles in this publication were written
by experts in the field and will prove \'aluable to
companies in advanced industries. If you would
like to contact any of the contributors, email
me at [email protected]. Full contact
information for all of the sponsoring organizations
that can help with your location and expansion
needs is listed in the back of this magazine.
J1~~Edito r
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
1 EDITOR'S NOTE
2 THE ROLE OF LABOR IN
ADVANCED MANUFACTURING
Advanced manufacturing will continue to be reliant upon human interaction for the application and management of technology.
6 TECH COMPANIES PARTNER
WITH HOST COMMUNITIES
Increasing world competition is driving an increasingly complex business paradigm for aerospace and other technology companies.
1 2 THE CHANGING GEOGRAPHY OF THE AMERICAN AUTO INDUSTRY
Where is auto production currently concentrated, and where will the industry expand in the future?
1 7 ADVANCED MANUFACTURERS UTILIZE
INCENTIVES TO IMPROVE FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
Incentives have moved from the fringes of a project to being a part of the competitiveness equation in bringing manufacturers back to the U.S.
2 3 AUTOMOTIVE LIGHTWEIGHTING
LEADS TO INDUSTRY INVESTMENT
New fuel economy and greenhouse gas regulations are leading to the demand for new materials as well as new manufacturing and design methods to lightweight vehicles.
2 9 EUROPEAN AUTO MAKERS LOOK TO NORTH AMERICA
Direct investment in North America is allowing European automotive companies to distinguish themselves from their competitors.
3 2 SPONSORS DIRECTORY
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I 2 0 1 4
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
ADVANCED MANUFACTURING WILL
CONTlNUE TO BE RELIANT UPON HUMAN
INTERAGTlON FOR THE APPLICATION AND
MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY.
BY BRAD LINDQUIST, SENIOR MANAGING DIRECTOR,
NEWMARK GRUBB KNIGHT FRANK
These days, it is hard to find a new project announcement for a business that manufactures or
produces something in the United States that is not classified
under the "advanced manufacturing" umbrella. It is used
repeatedly, after all, as the universal description for just
about any and all manufacturing operations taking place in
the United States and other developed countries.
It is readily apparent that in the past decade, any
manufacturing processes a company identifies that are not
reliant upon technology, yet driven by manual labor, have
already shifted production to lower-cost countries. Many
companies that sought to capitalize on decreasing their
operational costs overseas, and in particular in China, are
now experiencing the effects of rising labor-cost pressures,
resulting in their search for the next emerging "hot spot"
location that can provide low-cost, unskilled labor that is the
foundation for traditional manufacturing.
2 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
2014
An Authoritative Definition Advanced manufacturing, however, is not dependent
on pursuing the lowest-cost environment around the globe.
Advanced manufacturing, while lacking an authoritative
definition, is more likely to be:
• Capital-intensive utilizing expensive machinery
and equipment requiring a low-risk location (when
considering natural disaster, economic, political, and
social stability)
• Energy-intensive with extremely sensitive equipment
highly dependent on a reliable power supply
• Labor-intensive, yet requiring fewer positions, with an
increasing demand on higher-skilled labor to execute
necessary tasks due to process automation
• Proprietary in nature and based on unique knowledge
requiring strong intellectual property laws
U.S. as a Leader As a leader of innovative manufacturing solutions, the
United States is well positioned in the global economy to
see increased/ continued investment and projected related
activity for these so-called advanced manufacturing
operations- from the revival of the domestic automotive
industry through innovative and cutting-edge technologies,
to growth in related transportation industries and sectors
that ha\ e al o \'i ibly improved (such as aircraft, trains, and
spac hip-). Advanced manufacturing techniques are also
creating greater efficiencies for the production of everyday
consumer goods, such as those in the food and medical
industries.
Advanced Industries Work to Close
Quality education and training that fills the pipeline of skilled workers
are key drivers of economic growth and prosperity. As the nation faces major
workforce hurdles in the coming years, there are a handful of companies and
states that are proactively solving the issues to meet future challenges.
the Skills Gap When the nation's growing gap in skilled workers came to the forefront,
Iowa's leaders quickly mobilized and through public/private partnerships
implemented initiatives to focus on science, technology, engineering, and
math (STEM) education. Co-chaired by Iowa's Lt. Gov. Kim Reynolds and Vermeer CEO Mary Andringa, Iowa's STEM
efforts have garnered national attention among educational and policy leaders in Washington, D.C., as one of the
best state models.
"We're a state that collaborates and makes things happen quickly," says Mary Andringa, CEO, Vermeer
Manufacturing Corporation. "And nothing is more evident of this fact than our STEM initiatives."
To date, more than 3,100 Iowa K-12 classrooms have implemented STEM programs, with nearly 100,000
students involved in the various programs. Awareness of STEM and its importance among Iowans has reached
41 percent in 2013.
Based in Pella for more than 65 years, Vermeer is a global manufacturer
of heavy-duty agricultural and industrial equipment like bale processors,
compost turners, and pipeline drills. More than 2,400 engineers, machinists,
welders, assemblers, IT, logistics, and marketing professionals work in Iowa
for Vermeer.
"Our workforce is more than ski ed and productive, they are engaged,"
says Andringa. "They take great effort to understand the in-market needs
of our customers and end-users."
Vermeer feeds its talent pipeline through extensive college-level co-op
Welders at Vermeer Manufacturing in Pella, Iowa, keep their skills sharp with ongo1ng training at local community colleges.
programs, internships, and training programs that reach down into the high school and middle school levels. With
an office at Iowa State University's Research Park, several engineering students split their time working for Vermeer
on-campus or at the production facility.
Iowa's network of 15 community colleges offers comprehensive educational programs and often adapts or
enhances curriculum to meet the needs of area employers. "By leveraging state funding, we've collaborated with
Des Moines Area Community College to enhance the welders training program," Andringa explains. "With this
financial and educational support, we've been able to elevate the skills of our current welders and add more to
our workforce with each session we hold."
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I 2014 3
Why is the United States currently well positioned for
these projects? With the exception of the U.S. tax climate,
other critical location factors typically associated with the
key criteria cited above are competitive advantages for the
United States when compared with other developed nations.
As the leading innovator of new advanced technologies,
the U.S. is able to compete on a global scale, even with a
relatively high cost of labor; because the application of
technology and innovation support advanced levels of
production, the volume of labor required is reduced.
In addition to offsetting the high-cost labor market
with fewer overall jobs, the U.S. appears to be enjoying a
period of abundant energy resources, and offers among the
lowest-cost energy for developed countries anywhere in
the world. Additionally, the overall risk profile (economic
and social stability) of the U.S. is relatively low. There are
effective intellectual property laws and a high level of
transparency on how business is conducted. Finally, despite
an aging infrastructure network, there is still access to highly
reliable core utilities, such as water, sewer, telecom, gas, and
electric- all important factors when determining where to
invest hundreds of millions of dollars or more for a single
operation. Yet, an underlying factor remains the access and
availability of skilled labor.
The Labor Factor It has been a common theme to hear about the shortage of
skilled labor, despite the relatively high unemployment over
A student at Southwestern Illinois College uses a CNC machine to create a metal object to specifications programmed into the machine.
4 A DVA NCEDINDUSTRIES
Manufacturing maintenance training at Daley College, Chicago
the past few years. A typical manufacturing position requires
a different profile of employee than in previous generations.
Reportedly, more than 27 percent of all manufacturing
employees have a bachelor 's degree or higher. The wages
of manufacturing jobs continue to rise as well (which may
be a reflection of the growth of advanced skills to support
the changing manufacturing base) with an average annual
manufacturing salary in the U.S. at nearly $60,000.
The continued innovation and technology implications
infiltrating and driving manufacturing advancements
dictate very specific human interaction and support. The
ability to develop and retain talent for these specific projects
and industries is imperative to their success. Where other
key location criteria can be measured very directly (cost
of electricity, state tax structure, risk of natural disasters),
the ability to measure the implications of labor is more
di~ficult to attain. No single fac tor can clearly establish the
ability of a location to offer the immediate presence of labor
skills. Comparative wage levels may reflect a long tenured
workforce in their respective positions rather than the skill
level of the labor force. Educational attainment for a location
can't be pegged to a specific industry or labor subset. And
there are dozens of other criteria that can be considered, but
still not clearly point to the right labor environment for a
project.
Labor economists can assess specific positions relative
to their respective industry presence, seeking to establish
trends and growth in a particular location to determine the
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
capacity of a labor market to support a project's needs. A
high presence of a particular skill may indicate a general
"herdin " effect, whereby projects and companies are
competing for the same type of skilled labor (think life
sciences or aviation clusters). Other projects may also seek
Continued on page 11
Workforce Training Vital to
Today's innovative companies require highly skilled workers-
a need that cannot be overstated. Kentucky is among those states that have
focused their efforts on supplying the workforce that current and future
companies need.
Business Health The key has been to eliminate the bureaucracy and, in its place, offer
personalized services depending on the needs of the individual company.
To accomplish this, Governor Steve Beshear announced the creation of the
Kentucky Skills Network. The network combines the efforts of several state
government and educational institutions to provide one-stop workforce services and resources for new and existing
employers. This includes customized recruitment and training solutions, as well as implementation assistance.
Qualifying Kentucky companies are eligible for recruitment and job-screening services at no cost. Additionally,
flexible grant funding is available to offset t he costs of customized and in-house training needs and to establish
apprenticeship programs and to provide free safety and OSHA training. State tax credits are also available for
approved training programs for existing employees of qualifying companies. Last year alone, training was provided
for more than 83,000 Kentuckians in fields including manufacturing, healthcare, information technology, energy,
distribution, and research and development.
An Automotive Success Story One of the most popular and effective tools used t hrough the Kentucky Skills
Network involves grants and tax cred its. One company that benefited from a
grant was INOAC, a Tier II supplier of 'nstrument panels to Ford and Toyota
-two companies that contribute to Kentucky ranKing third in the nation in
automotive production.
In 2009, INOAC needed to train its workforce ·n new production processes.
The supplier formed a partnership with t he Springfield-Washington County
Economic Development Authority, the Kentucky Community and Technical
College System, and the Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development. The Kentucky Skills Network provided
INOAC no-cost recruitment services and awarded t he company a $160,000 grant to offset the cost of two years
of employee on-the-job training. INOAC was also able to secure additional training assistance from the local
community and technical college. As a resu it, INOAC was able to grow its Springfield workforce from 180 four years
ago to 330 today.
According to Kurt Krug, vice president of North American Human Resources for INOAC, business leaders
are sometimes unaware of how government agencies can help, or they may fear red tape and rejection, but he's
impressed with Kentucky's team approach. He notes, "Kentucky is doing some very good, creative things .. . the way
I see it, everyone benefits. It's a true partnership."
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I 201 4 5
I DVANCED DUSTRIES
INCREASING WORLD COMPETTTlON IS
DRIVING AN INCREASINGLY COMPLEX
BUSINESS PARADIGM FOR AEROSPACE
AND OTHER TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES.
BY .JEFF TROAN, DIRECTOR,
LOCKHEED MARTIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DPPORTUNmES
American management structure and process owes its origins to three individuals: Deming,
Drucker, and Sloan. Of the three, W. Edwards Deming
probably remains the most pertinent today. His definition
of quality as a product "produced to the customer 's
specification, at or ahead of schedule, at the lowest possible
cost" forms the basis of a host of process optimization
programs, from Six Sigma to Total Quality Management.
Since the early 1980s, aerospace and technology
companies around the world have embraced Deming's
principles, and strained waste and defects from the
manufacturing process. That has led to the realization
by many business sectors that, given targeted workforce
development support, a very broad class of labor can
produce high-technology products around the world.
Thus, today we see German cars produced in rural China,
communication satellites built in southern Mississippi, and
6 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
2014
software development projects executed in Puerto Rico
(and that's just a snippet of mankind's recent workforce
development accomplishments).
At the same time, the fall of the Soviet Union in 1989
has led the world to the realization that any sustainable
economic system has to be rooted in capitalism. That,
combined with other environmental factors like improved
networking capabilities and the spread of English as a
common business language, has led to an explosion of
productivity in the former Eastern Bloc and developing
world, opening both new markets and new production
location opportunities for the world's corporations.
And so, the planet has become a very competitive
place, where it is increasingly difficult to differentiate one's
company based solely on heritage factors like business
process optimization and workforce. What arises is an
extension of the business process optimization model to the
business climate.
This trend isn't something one can ignore as a product
line manager, site selector, or commerce official. In a mature
industry sector, even the most process-efficient company
with the highest quality workforce will find survival
challenging if its tax climate is unfavorable, it operates
in an area with a high cost of living (driving up its labor
3280 Hwy70 E Location: New Bern, NC 28562
Available Sq Ft: 22,522
Manufacturing Sq Ft: 17,722
EastAlliance
Kingsboro-Rose Mega Site Locatton: Rocky Mount. NC 27801
Available Acreage: 1,225 acres
CSX Select Site
Pitt-Greene Shell #1 Location: Farmville, NC 27828
Available Sq Ft: 28,800
Former Use: New
Prime east coast location, a nationally-acclaimed STEM education initiative, engineering programs at 2 un·versities and a nearby independent auto test track
make eastern North Carolina an ideal location for advanced manufacturers.
The NCEast Alliance is a regional economtc development corporation serving approximately 1 million residents within several small metropolitan and micropolitan areas from the fringe of the Research Triangle to the
Atlantic Coast. The Alliance provides commumty capacity building and assists companies with site location and expansion assistance mcluding identification of available industrial sites and buildings.
Kathy Howard - Vtce Prestdent. Cltent & Workforce Development
[email protected] • NCbldgs.com • 1-800-474-8499
costs), utilities are expensive and/ or unreliable, and the
infrastructure is aging. Capitalism, despite its many faults, is
a wonderful driver of efficiency. Unless you're producing at
or near Deming's optimal production point, Adam Smith's
invisible hand will strike you from the field, posthaste.
Extending Business Process Optimization to the Business Climate
New business managers at major aerospace and
technology corporations talk about discriminators and
disruptors. Discriminators provide a notable technical, cost
or schedule advantage that improves the chance of winning
a major proposal or building market share. Disruptors
are much more rare. They are such significant changes
in operating practice, that it is difficult for a competitive
intelligence team to predict them, and they have a market
reshaping impact on new work.
THE PROCESS OF MAINTAINING THE BALANCE BETWEEN CORE AND NONCORE BUSINESS HAS BECOME MUCH MORE COMPLEX.
Business climate modifications are reaching proportions
that put them in the disruptive category. Boeing's relocation
to South Carolina and Oklahoma; L3 Corporation's
relocation of Aircraft Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul
operations to Waco, Texas; Northrop Grumman's new
aircraft design and manufacturing facilities in Saint
Augustine and Melbourne, Florida; and Airbus' new aircraft
fabrication facilities in Alabama are just a few examples of
disruptive level moves in aerospace and technology.
Business climate modifications are the province of
public-sector economic developers, the consulting agencies
that support them, and the corporations forward-thinking
enough to see the paradigm shift. Economic development is
a method by which a local community can artificially modify
its business climate to enable targeted industry sectors to
8 A DVA NCED INDUSTRIES
con tinue to produce, where natural capitalist principles
would drive the work elsewhere.
Economists break out producers into two categories: core
and noncore. Core businesses import cash into a community
and export product (either a good or service) outside the
community (either domestic or internationally). These
are the core engines of capitalism that propel all the other
sectors of the economy. Noncore businesses take the "spend"
generated by the payroll and procurement of core businesses
and create secondary activity. These businesses are also
important because they create induced employment in
sectors as diverse as construction and retail. They also create
the taxable transactions that provide the revenue necessary
for municipalities to maintain public services and retain core
employment.
A community that lacks core employment is either in
economic decline, or serving as a bedroom community to
someone else's core business (economic seepage).
A community that lacks noncore employment
can't generate secondary and tertiary taxation
and employment. The core money slips away
(economic leakage).
The process of maintaining the balance between
core and noncore business has become much more
complex over the las t 50 years. Gone are the days
following World War II, when the United States
had the majority of the viable production capacity
on the planet. Firs t, Europe and Japan recovered
production capacity, followed by the modernization of the
former Eastern Bloc nations, and finally the developing
world. The significant core business loss that the United
States end_ured during the early years of the 21st century
has reduced the number of core employers, and made the
surviving companies very cost-conscious.
To attract and retain (yes, retain) core businesses in
the twenty-first century, communities will have to offer
significant workforce development support, combined with
a business climate package that makes their companies
competitive with producers that enjoy lower labor costs and
more favorable taxation.
The good news is, to a large extent, noncore businesses
will follow the new cash spend of core businesses, so they
can endure a harsher business climate than one's core
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
engine, rebalancing community financial models. However,
communities should remain cognizant of quality-of-life
issues and acceptable residential housing stock, to ensure
core business employees locate (and spend their salaries) in
the community.
"But shouldn't every company be taxed the same?"
Workforce Training Takes Flight in the Aerospace Sector
Workforce development is critical to a state's economic development
mission. This is particularly true when it comes to Mississippi's expanding
aerospace industry, which was launched in the 1930s when Pioneer Aerospace,
a part of Zodiac Aerospace, began manufacturing parachute systems in the
state. After decades of continued growth, Mississippi is now home to more
than 20 aerospace leaders as well as NASA's Stennis Space Center.
State officials collaborate with companies and Mississippi's 15 community
colleges to tailor workforce-training programs to meet specific company needs. When GE Aviation announced the
opening of its 300,000-square-foot facility in Batesville, Miss., in 2008, company officials cited a successful working
relationship with the state and its universities as key to its location decision. The company collaborated with
Northwest Community College to train workers in the sophisticated skills necessary to
manufacture composite parts forGE's GEnx jet engine, including fan platforms and fan
case assembly.
In 2013, GE Aviation expanded to meet global demand. Based on the success of its
Batesville location, Ellisville became t'1e company's second location in the state, and
the company invested $56 million to employ 250 workers at its 344,000-square-foot
composites manufacturing facility. GE Aviation partnered with Jones County Junior
College for workforce training and credits the success of its Mississippi operations to
its partnership with the state's community colleges. These institutions offer programs of
particular interest to aerospace companies, including aviation maintenance technology,
avionics, and unmanned aircraft systems.
"GE Aviation's growing partnersh'p with the state of Mississippi is creating long-term
economic growth," said David Joyce, president and CEO of GE Aviation at the opening
of the Ellisville facility. "We couldn't be happier with our Batesville operation, and we look
forward to the growth of our new Ellisvi e operation."
Mississippi's nine public universities also play a vital role in research and development.
Established in 1948, the Raspet Flight Research Laboratory at Mississippi State University
is the largest university flight lab of its kind in the U.S., and its business incubator provides
an economical start-up facility for companies like GE Aviation, Aurora Flight Sciences, and
Stark Aerospace.
Rolls-Royce opens its second jet engine test stand at NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center in Mississippi . The Outdoor Jet Engine Test Facility performs jet engine testing on the latest, most advanced Rolls-Royce civil aircraft engines, including the Trent 1000, which powers the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, and the Trent X:VVB, which powers the Airbus 350X:VVB.
It's no wonder that the companies located in Mississippi's aerospace corridor continue to grow. In fact, 2013 and
2014 have yielded significant expansion for Raytheon, Rolls-Royce, General Atomics, and Aurora Flight Sciences.
ADVANCED INDUSTRIE S I 2014 9
The answer is, really, no, and such a policy can be very
destructive to community economic balance.
First, flat taxation is never fair. For example, communities
that tax primarily on capital investment inherently
overburden capital-intense industries, and those that
primarily tax wages, unfairly burden research and
development firms.
Second, different employers face different economic
pressures and provide different value to the local economy.
In the new world economy, "new cash spend" is king,
and that can only be provided by a dwindling number of
core employers. Economic balance is maintained by the
community through a combination of judicious fiscal policy,
modified taxation, and affordable housing stock.
What the Paradigm Shift Means to Aerospace and Technology Companies
Core businesses in the aerospace and technology sector
need to be attuned to the business climate and partner with
host communities to preserve a competitive position. Until
recently, this usually meant moving operations to a receptive
community, because public-sector economic development
officials tended to view economic development packages for
heritage employers unfavorably.
While moving an entire operation (millions of square
feet and thousands of jobs) to a new community is certainly
a decisive way to improve a company's overall business
A Lockheed Martin F-35 f ighter aircraft being produced at the company's factory in Fort Worth, Texas
1 0 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
climate, it does have its disadvantages. Such a strategy has
the following negatives:
• An accounting write-off of all assets at the former
operations site;
• Carrying cost on the vacant facility before resale;
• The cost of the new facility;
• Operations shutdown as the company relocates tooling
to the new site (or purchase of duplicate tooling);
• Relocation of key employees to the new location;
• Recruiting of most of the workforce as new; and
• Significant training obligations to enable the new
workforce.
Many of these costs can be covered via a well-negotiated
economic development partnership with the new town's
public-sector coalition (state and local government,
domestically). A good package will include all four categories
of economic development incentives: (1) statutory; (2)
discretionary; (3) legal construction; and (4) legislative.
Generally, a legislative move is utilized to commit enough
funds from general revenue to support project financing. This
is also a good time for the public coalition to modify ancillary
statutes to best accommodate the targeted industry in general.
Once complete, the public coalition constructs facilities
to the requirements of the company, and leases them the
assets at a discounted rate. In many states, such public
sector "ownership and lease" will define a form of legal
construction that exempts the property from ad valorem
taxation. Discretionary and statutory economic development
programs can then be combined to help support equipment
relocation, calibration, and installation, as well as play a
major role in workforce development and recruiting. Key
employee relocation costs seem to be the most difficult
expense to get reimbursed, but they occasionally can be
recovered through a discretionary fund.
All that said, many companies fail to realize that this
support is not free, and they are going to be bound by possible
recapture obligations by the same contract that brought
them the favorable business climate. Economic development
recapture, commonly known as "clawbacks," comes in many
forms. In general, failure to achieve job generation, average
salary, and capital investment goals means the corporation
will forfeit part or all of its economic development partnership
support. Recapture terms may increase its lease rates, or the
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
public coalition may simply require cash penalties for failure
to meet tar2:ets. Further, many states have "digital rules"
on recapture, where missing a target by one job can cost the
corporation a ignificant penalty.
is both ethical and cost-effective. Even states like New Jersey
and California are now participating with multiple economic
development programs that look to retain key employers.
Clawbac ha,·e to be considered in the company's
financial and either covered via termination liability from
its customer , if possible, force majeure, or reserve funds.
The economic de,·elopment contracts are best monitored
Companies need no longer assume they have to relocate
to survive. The changing emphasis in the public sector on
retaining the economic base opens a myriad of options, from
facilities consolidation efforts to new business economic
development partnerships. These preserve and improve
as part of the quarterly financial process, so that operations
management remains aware of the consequences of its day
to-day decision-making.
the heritage workforce and minimize new investment in
facilities and infrastructure.
The good news is that the heritage model is changing, as
the public sector is coming to the conclusion that preserving
core employment through economic development principles
So, whether you are a corporate executive or a public-sector
policymaker, I will leave you with a passage from Charles
Darwin. "The future belongs not to the strongest or most
intelligent, but to those most able to adapt." Good hunting. • •
new or emerging locations to deploy
their assets, requiring a more intense
process and business involvement to
access or develop the core labor skills
required.
device manufacturer. It is critical that
partnerships between the business
community and higher education
institutions are e tabli hed.
If the skills gap in manufacturing
REGARDLESS OF MANUFACTURING SECTOR, A COMPANY MUST HAVE THE NECESSARY SKILLED WORKFORCE AVAILABLE FROM THE START.
---
Partnering With Educational Institutions
Regardless of industry or sector
of manufacturing, a company must
have the necessary skilled workforce
available from the start. The best
community will have the ability to
provide or develop a workforce with
the requisite skills, whether it is for
a company that manufactures and
a sembles executive jets or a medical
positions is as wide as we are lead to
believe, then it is even more imperative
that the business community takes
a proactive approach to addressing
the issue in partnership with local
learning institutions- creating new
programs, training workshops, etc. to
meet their needs rather than remaining
silently on the sideline. It's no wonder
that there is often a tight connection
between advanced manufacturing
Role of Labor Continued from page 5
projects and the presence of a local
training institution, whether it's the local
community college or a major university.
Many states now include grants
directly to educational institutions
as part of incentive and inducement
packages to attract substantial new
projects/ investment/ job creation
opportunities. These grants may not
directly benefit a company's bottom
line, but establishing the foundation
for a sustainable workforce pipeline
through partnership with local higher
educational institutions is a critical
component to the long-term viability
of many companies to successfully
operate in a particular location.
States and communities that are
able to demonstrate support for the
development of people skills will
be best positioned to see continued
growth in the advanced manufacturing
sector. • •
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ ·
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I 201 4 1 1
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
WHERE IS AUTO PRODUCTION CURRENTLY
CONCENTRATED, AND WHERE WILL THE
INDUSTRY EXPAND IN THE FUTURE?
BY DENNIS CUNEO, P ARTNER, FISHER & PHIUUPS LLP
An ancient Greek philosopher once commented that there is nothing permanent except
change. This is certainly true of the American auto industry,
which has been transformed over the past three decades.
The companies making vehicles in America changed, and the
location of auto production also changed. Future change in the
industry could impact its manufacturing geography once again.
A Brief History The restructuring of the American auto industry began
in the 1980s- and accelerated during the Great Recession,
which resulted in the bankruptcies of GM and Chrysler.
Since the Great Recession, the industry has recovered,
with U.S. production close to pre-recession levels. The
industry is once again profitable and growing, leading to
new opportunities for communities seeking auto-related
investment.
Auto assembly plants are among the crown jewels of
1 2 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
2014
economic development. A typical auto plant will employ
up to 5,000 people, with above average wages and benefits,
and will generate thousands of spinoff jobs. According to the
Center for Automotive Research in Ann Arbor, Mich., every
assembly plant job creates a total of 10 jobs in the supplier
and support industries.
The auto industry also spurs huge R&D expenditures
-both by the automakers and their suppliers. Booz & Co.
estimates that the global auto industry spent $102 billion
on R&D in 2013, about four times more than the aerospace
and defense industry.• A Brookings' study notes that high
value engineering and R&D-intensive industries, such as
automotive, are " the prime movers of regional and national
prosperity."' That explains why so many state and local
economic developers continue to focus on attracting auto
investment.
When I first started working in the auto industry in
the early 1980s, five companies - GM, Ford, Chrysler,
American Motors, and Volkswagen - assembled vehicles
in 21 states scattered throughout the nation. In addition
to their traditional base in the Midwest (Michigan, Ohio,
Indiana), the Detroit 3 operated plants on both coasts and
in the South/Southwest. Over the next three decades,
the Detroit 3 restructured, closing plants in several states,
and consolidating most of their American manufacturing
operations into their traditional Midwest base. At the same
time, the Asian and European automakers started building
cars in the traditional automotive states, such as Ohio and
Indiana, and also in the Southern States, which saw a rapid
growth in vehicle manufacturing.
Auto Alley and the Auto West Corridor After three decades of restructuring by the Detroit 3,
and expansion by Asian and European automakers, most
auto production in America is now consolidated in an area
nicknamed "Auto Alley," roughly defined as the corridor
between I-65 and I-75, running from the Great Lakes to the
Gulf Coast.'
While auto production is likely to remain centered in
Auto Alley, the auto industry is also expanding west of Auto
Alley, in an area that I will dub the" Auto West Corridor."
This area is roughly bounded by I-55 in the east and I-35 in
the west, extending from Illinois to Texas, and is home to 10
auto assembly plants. States in this corridor are well placed
to compete for future automotive investment.
When GM and Ford consolidated most of their
manufacturing in Auto Alley, they did not close their
assembly plants in Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, and Texas. Since
the Great Recession, these automakers have announced more
than $3 billion in new investments in those plants, creating
several thousand new jobs. A recent Brookings' study notes
that the Kansas City metro area, with large GM and Ford
assembly plants, is now the second-largest auto-industry
trading hub in North America, after the Detroit area.•
Over the past decade, Toyota built two new assembly
plants west of the I-65/I-75 corridor- in Tupelo,
Mississippi, and San Antonio, Texas- and recently
announced that it will create a new North American
headquarters near Dallas that will employ 4,000 people.
Nissan started up its Canton, Mississippi, plant in 2002,
also west of the I-65/I-75 corridor, and is in the process
of expanding the facility. Mitsubishi recently expanded
production at its Normal, Illinois, plant, and Chrysler added
a third shift as part of the $700 million expansion at its
Belvidere, Illinois, plant.
Taken together, when the current expansions are
completed, the six automakers will employ over 40,000
people in the corridor. This investment in new auto assembly
capacity has been followed by new supplier investment in
the region. Missouri, for example, has recently announced 10
supplier expansions and new plants, creating 1,000 jobs.
Rapid Expansion of Mexico's Auto Industry Another factor that may contribute to the future growth
of the Auto West Corridor is its proximity to Mexico, which
is emerging as a major automotive hub. Twenty years after
the passage of NAFTA, Mexico has attracted significant new
automotive investment. BMW and Mercedes are the latest of
a string of automakers that have announced plans to build
new assembly plants there.
As Mexico's auto assembly has expanded, so has it
auto parts sector. Delphi, which was formerly GM's parts
division, is one of several parts manufacturers that have
shifted a significant portion of their North American
production to Mexico from the U.S. Mexican parts content
in American-built vehicles has increased fourfold since the
enactment of NAFTA. On average, a vehicle made in the
United State contains more than $4,000 worth of Mexican
made parts. ' For example, Ford's Wayne, Michigan,
assembly plant sources 27 percent of its parts from Mexico,'
and Volkswagen's Chattanooga plant sources 15 percent of
its parts from Mexico.'
The rapid expansion of the Mexican automotive industry
has raised alarm bells, especially in some of the Southern
VEHICLE PRODUCTION IN NORTH AMERICA
ADVANC E D INDUSTRIES I 2014 1 3
States, which haven't seen a new greenfield assembly plant
since Volkswagen announced its Chattanooga plant in 2008.
Although some see Mexico's burgeoning auto industry as
a threat, it is an opportunity for others. The auto industry
in North America is rapidly integrating, with vehicles and
parts moving across the border in both directions. Proximity
to Mexican parts suppliers could provide a logistical
advantage for plants located in the Auto West Corridor, if
the trend toward increased Mexican parts content continues.
As illustrated in the table on page 16, assembly plants
located in the southern part of the corridor are closer to
Mexico than many of the assembly plants located in Auto
Alley. Fewer miles from Mexico means lower transportation
costs for Mexican parts, which are making up an increasing
percentage of the content of American-made vehicles.
To be sure, the auto industry is alive and well in
Automotive Alley, which has seen some $29 billion in new
investment (in existing plants) since the Great Recession.•
But the recent new investment in the Auto West Corridor
and its proximity to Mexico suggest that states in this
corridor may be in a position to compete for the next new
greenfield U.S. auto assembly plant.
The West Is Back In Play Moving further west, northern California is an emerging
hub of automotive activity, with the Tesla plant in Fremont,
California, and the uptick in automotive activity in Silicon
Valley.
Automotive Suppliers Cluster in Central Mexico's Industrial Parks
The corridor of suppliers to the automotive industry that has developed
in Mexico Bajio's Region is important to the many car and truck makers that
have chosen to locate their manufacturing facilities there.
Castro del Rio Technoindustrial Park (CDR)- a Marabis Development
and the largest private industrial park in the state of Guanajuato- is home
to many of these companies, basically because it is just 17 miles from the
GM plant and 21 miles from the VW engines plant, both in Silao; 18 miles
from the Mazda plant in Salamanca; and 42.5 miles from the Honda plant in
Celaya. Nissan Aguascalientes is also located only 112 miles from CDR; Mexico City is only 200 miles away; the U.S.
border can be reached in nine hours; and both east and west coast seaports are within just six hours.
To top it off, the park offers a premium utility infrastructure with available, expandable sites. More than
700,000 people live within a 15-mile radius, providing a young, qualified
workforce at a competitive cost. Additiona lly, and very 'mportant for
a development of its kind, a public inst itution CONALEP) can train
technicians on-site; this is thanks to the Schaeffler Group which initiated
this program based on the German model of creating a tailor-made
training program, another important advantage for suppliers to the
automotive industry and other firms.
Within the past eight years, 57 companies - including more than 45
international firms - have set up shop in CDR. Marabis Group has one more industrial park in the neighboring area
besides CDR in lrapuato- Marabis Abasolo, also in the state of Guanajuato, is only 40 minutes away from CDR,
with the same world-class infrastructure that international companies are looking for to run a successful industrial
manufacturing operation.
1 4 A D VAN CED INDUSTRIES
Four decades ago, California was home to five auto
assembly plants operated by the Detroit 3. After the
NUMMI joint venture shuttered the last remaining auto
assembly plant in California in 2010, most observers wrote
off auto production in the state. But a newcomer, Tesla, has
successfully started up operations at the former NUMMI
plant, and now employs several thousand people there.
Tesla builds electric vehicles and is looking for a site for a $5
billion "giga-factory" to make batteries, which it says will
employ 6,500 people. As of this writing, Tesla has narrowed
its search to five states, all located in the Southwest and
West.
Silicon Valley has recently attracted significant auto
related investment, causing one tech blog to proclaim that
the valley is becoming "the new Detroit." As vehicles add
Toyot a, San Antonio TX
GM, Arl ington TX
GM, Kansas City MO
1 6 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
DISTANCE TO SAN LUIS POTOSI, MEXICO (a major automo i e and logistics hub}
605 miles
891 miles
1,425 miles
1,580 miles
1,730 miles
1,980 miles
more technology and software, the nine largest automakers
and three largest global auto suppliers have set up offices
and R&D facilities in Silicon Valley. A company best known
for its Internet search engine, Coogle, is making a significant
investment in the auto industry as it develops
self-driving, autonomous vehicles. It recently
unveiled a prototype vehicle that it designed and
built without a steering wheel, brake pedals, or
an accelerator. A video of the vehicle, which can
be found on You Tube, shows happy passengers
going along for a ride in a driverless car. Some
in the industry are speculating that Coogle
may be the next new automaker. Among auto
industry experts, opinions differ about when
fully autonomous vehicles will be viable. IHS, a
prominent auto industry forecasting firm, predicts 54 million
autonomous vehicles will be on the road within 20 years
-and that by 2050 nearly half of all vehicles will be self
driving.
Whatever the outcome, the development of the
autonomous vehicle is yet another indication that the auto
industry is in another, long-term disruptive phase, which
will have implications on where vehicles are developed and
built. ~ew developments could lead to new opportunities.
State and regions once considered "out of the mix" for new
auto investment might find they are back in the game. • •
!_-::: ance, 2013 report on Auto Innovation 2 :!~< ngs, ·Metro North America: Cities & Metros as Hubs of Advanced Industries & Integrated Goocs Trade" j Or:e of he first to coin the term "Auto Alley" was Tom Klier, an economist with the Chicago Fed.
See"" s book w1th James Rubenstein, Who Really Made Your Car? Upjohn Institute, April2008 Ca"aoa. which abuts the northern tip of Auto Alley, is a significant auto manufacturing hub- but it -as ost several plants and lags behind Mexico for new auto investment. 1 3•ool(ings, "Metro North America: Cities & Metros as Hubs of Advanced Industries & Integrated Goods Trade" 5 Scot.abank. Global Auto Report, March 2014 6 Economic Contribution of the Ford Michigan Assembly Plant," Center for Automotive Research 7 Volkswagen Growing Plants With Strong Routes in North America," Automotive Logistics, April 2013 8 Center for Automotive Research
ADVA CEO INDUSTRIES
INCENTIVES HAVE MOVED FROM THE FRINGES
OF A PRO.JECT TO BEING A PART OF THE
COMPETITIVENESS EQUATION IN BRINGING
MANUFACTURERS BACK TO THE U.S.
BY GREGORY BURKART, PRACTlCE LEADER,
SITE SELECTlON & BUSINESS INCENTlVE ADVISORY SERVICES
DUFF & PHELPS, LLC
The U.S. economy has begun to rebound. By 2015, some experts are predicting that the manufacturing
sector could add approximately 1.1 million jobs over the
2010 base. '
Three factors are driving the resurgence of U.S.
manufacturing. First, the U.S. dollar is weak. The fa,·orable
exchange rate helps the U.S. become a competitive producer
of goods and attracts foreign investment. In 2002 1
purchased 133 Yen. Today, that same dollar purchases only
100 Yen. The same is true with the Euro, despite all of the
troubles on the continent. Today $1 buys only 0.75 Euro
versus 1.14 Euros 10 years ago.
Second, the U.S. labor force is becoming more
competitive. As productivity rises faster than wage costs,
unit labor costs in the U.S. are falling. According to The
2014
Bo ton Consulting Group, worker productivity has been
growing fa ter in the United States than in Western Europe
and China. From 2005 to 2010, worker productivity in the
L" .. grew at 2 percent annually, while the major economies
of Western Europe averaged only 0.4 percent. This trend
continued in 2011 and 2012, with U.S. productivity
increasing 2.6 percent and 2.2 percent, respectively, while
Europe averaged only 1.1 percent increases.
Compared with China, U.S. workers are 2.8 times more
productive. In 2010 real output per worker was $120,000
in the U.S. versus $35,000 in China. Even though Chinese
productivity is increasing, by about 8.4 percent per year,
their productivity is not rising fast enough to offset annual
wage increases of 18 percent. The Boston Consulting Group
estimates that by 2015, the total labor-cost savings of
manufacturing goods in China will be only 10 percent to 15
percent when productivity-adjusted labor is considered.
Third, Chinese logistics costs are rising. The total cost
of China's logistics rose by 18.5 percent in the first half
of 2011 due to rising prices of raw materials, labor, and
lending rates. Transport costs rose by 15.5 percent, storage
costs soared 22.7 percent, and interest expenses jumped
24 percent. At these levels, China's logistics costs are more
than double the average in Western Europe, Japan, and the
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I ZD 1 4 1 7
United States. Moreover, when you add a risk premium for
"black swan" events, the costs are even higher.
With increasing global competition, state and local
governments have the tools to improve the financial strength
of manufacturers locating within their communities. As
manufacturers analyze locations in the U.S., they should
consider tapping into economic development incentives to
further improve their performance.
SIMILAR TO AN ABATEMENT, A REBATE OR REFUND REDUCES A TAX LIABILITY; HOWEVER, A COMPANY PAYS THE TAX AND LATER RECEIVES A REFUND.
Let's look at some of the generally available incentives
that (1) reduce operating costs, (2) lower upfront
investments, and (3) enhance productivity. Also consider a
case study of an automotive supplier to demonstrate how
to think creatively about these basic incentives, combining
several programs into a holistic solution that juices your
financial performance even more.
Training Incentives Productivity is the lynchpin to U.S. competitiveness.
If manufacturers are repatriating projects, and if highly
automated shop floors are critical to their productivity, then
states and local communities need to offer a highly skilled
workforce. A common incentive is training, which comes in
a number of forms. For example, Louisiana has instituted the
FastStart program that replicates a private-sector consulting
model. It has been recognized as one of the best in the
country because it provides a comprehensive, free service
to companies including employee recruitment, screening,
training development, and training delivery.
For companies that want to conduct their own training,
Tennessee offers an excellent program. The Tennessee
Fast Track Job Training incentive is a cash grant that pays
50 percent of the committed training grant after 90 days of
1 8 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
employment, with the remaining training grant delivered
after associates have been employed for 180 days. Program
participants may also choose to submit their training
expenses and seek a reimbursement of their costs.
Abatements, Exemptions, and Rebates For companies investing in capital-intensive equipment
to increase their productivity, abatements, exemptions,
and rebates are particularly important ways to
reduce operating costs and increase EBITDA
(earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation,
and amortization). Some professionals use these
terms interchangeably; however, there is a slight
difference between each one.
An abatement is typically a partial reduction
in a future incremental tax, whereas an exemption
is usually a complete waiver of the tax for a
particular activity. A good example of an abatement
is Michigan's P.A. 198, which offers 50 percent
reductions in the incremental increase in property taxes
resulting from a project. For an exemption, Florida offers
another good example, as the state recently enacted a sales tax
exemption for manufacturing and processing equipment.
Similar to an abatement, a rebate or refund reduces a tax
liability; however, the timing is delayed. For a rebate or refund,
a company pays the tax and then, at a later point, receives a
refund. A good example is the property tax rebate in some
North Carolina communities such as Charlotte, which offers the
Business Investment Program (BIP) grants. Using this program,
grant recipients must consummate the qualifying investment
and pay all property taxes before grants are paid.
Payments or fees in lieu of tax (PILOT or PILOT) are a
closely related incentive offered in many Southern States. To
promote manufacturing, South Carolina offers a statutory
five-year property tax exemption as well as four types
of PILOTs known as "Big Fee," "Little Fee," "Simplified
Fee," and "Super Fee." nder a "fee," a manufacturer
may negotiate a lower assessment ratio, reducing it from
10.5 percent to a lower percentage but not below 6 percent
(4 percent is the minimum for certain projects investing
larger sums and creating jobs). In addition, a company may
negotiate for a fixed millage rate or adjust the millage rate
every five years for the period of the fee.
Help With Infrastructure Improvements Since logistical costs are also critical to luring manufacturers
from China, reliable infrastructure is important. Having good
freeway access, efficient rail yards (with access to multiple
carriers), and a port with efficient and predictable labor
relations is the backbone of low logistics costs.
On top of the property tax exemption and FILOT, South
Carolina offers the Special Source Revenue Credit (SSRC)
that can be used to pay for infrastructure improvements. In
connection with the "Little" or "Big" fees, a local community
may use the SSRC as either a credit against the fee payment
or float a bond and use the SSRC to pay the principal and
interest. In addition to infrastructure, a manufacturer
may use the proceeds of the bond or the credit to acquire
or improve real property or pay for personal property
dedicated to the project.
In addition to state-level grants, many local communities
have access to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development's (HUD) Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds. Manufacturers may tap these grants to pay
for public infrastructure such as roads, water, and sewer lines
or water treatment facilities. HUD distributes CDBG funds to
SiTo Approach-$9.2 million incentives
-+ ------+--- -----~----
Sales Property Income Training Cash Tax Tax Tax Grant
each state and entitlement communities- <>enerally larger
cities and counties- to promote the employment of low- to
moderate-income individuals. For projects in non-entitlement
communities, a manufacturer may approach the state to tap
into its statewide allocation of CDBG funds.
Other Incentives To offset other startup costs, some states and local
communities offer cash grants, favorable financing, or free
land. The most sought-after incentive is cash. Several states,
such as Texas and Florida, offer grants to close deals. Texas
has the "deal-closing" Enterprise Fund that has provided
approximately 53 0 million for projects from FY 2004 to FY
2011. Other states (e.g., Michigan's 21st Century Investment
Fund) are more entrepreneurial with their incentives
and offer equity injections, loan-interest loans, or credit
enhancements to their expanding manufacturers.
Another financing tool is Tax Increment Financing (TIF).
Approximately 48 of the 50 states permit local governments
to use some form of TIF. To start a TIF, a local community
creates a district and within its boundaries captures the
incremental increase in one or more taxes. For example, in
Holistic Approach $12.2 million incentives
Real Estate Cash Training Income Property Sales Lease Grant Tax Tax Tax
The whole, in some instances, can be greater than the sum of its individual parts. Combining little know features of traditional incentives into a holistic solution often creates more value than merely focusing on individual incentives.
20 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
Pennsyl\'ania a TIF may capture property taxes, sales/use
taxes, gros receipts, gross or net profits, or income taxes.
Once a community captures the increment, there are
a couple options for conveying the benefit to a company.
If authorized under statute, a TIF Authority may pay the
incremental taxes to a manufacturer to reimburse for eligible
expenses or float a bond and use the captured taxes to
repay the bond. Pennsylvania permits fairly broad uses.
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
The statute permits a TIF to reimburse for items including
construction, demolition, remodeling, or reconstruction
costs; new buildings or structures; acquisition of machinery
and equipment or land; public infrastructure located outside
TIF boundaries, if the investment will directly benefit a
project; financing costs, including issuance of bonds or
establishment of reserve funds; professional services;
administrative costs, including reasonable time spent by city
Shovel-Ready Sites Help Provide Speed to Market for Advanced
Advanced manufacturing has been defined as the use of innovative
technology to improve products or processes -and that just about takes in
all of today's manufacturing. The use of these innovative processes improves
products and, importantly, gets them to market faster.
Manufacturers
With that in mind, many advanced manufacturing companies are looking
at certified or shovel-ready sites. This has been an advantage for MidAmerica
Industria Park, which is ocated just 40 miles east of Tulsa, Oklahoma, at
"America 's Crossroads. " 1t's where 'nterstates 40 and 44 intersect, allowing
next-day delivery to nearly a quarter of the U.S. population.
At 9,000 acres, MidAmer'ca 's B ild ow program provides shovel
ready sites ranging from small parcels to larger tracts with al, uti ties i place. T e par also owns the water
and wastewater treatment systems and carries an umbre a PDES pe it to cover discharge requirements
for industries. MidAmerica has been designated a "cert fea ·lldustr'a park " by the Oklahoma Department
of Commerce. Since it's owned and operated by a public trust, red tape and fees have been eliminated and
construction can begin almost immediately.
Among the park's manufacturers are companies such as American Castings, Berry Plastics, RAE Corp., and
Performance Pipe. Shawn Spears, plant manager at Performance Pipe, notes,
"Our MidAmerica facility is the most effective in the entire system- for
production as well as delivery. Often this plant is chosen to deliver product
that logically should be delivered from another facility. The MidAmerica plant
is so efficient that even though product must be shipped further, it is still cost
effective to produce and ship from here in Pryor, Oklahoma."
Spears also cites the "can do" attitude of the people who run the park and
those who work in the support services in ano around it. Dalton Babineaux,
former president of American Castings, agrees: A huge plus we did not count
on when we located at the park was the oppo ity to partner with other companies in the area. We are very
:ortunate to have such talent.. .as our neighbors. •
Among the park's talented companies is Goog!e, which operates two data centers there. And, in September
2013, Google purchased the 1.4 million-square-foot former Gatorade manufacturing and distribution facility located
next to its MidAmerica campus.
ADVANCE D INDUSTRIES I 2014 2 1
or authority employees; relocation costs; and reimbursement
of prior expenditures related to allowed costs.
In some instances, nontraditional incentives are available
that do not provide cash or tax relief but can be of significant
value. Private-sector utility companies, along with local
communities that own their own utility services, may grant
reductions in electric, cable, water, or sewer ra - a: e <ap
in fees. A good example is ReCharge Tew Yor . \ "ch has 910
MW of power allocations available for busines:: - that meet
its program criteria. Another example is the Tennessee Valley
Authority, which offers a five-year credit against future utility
bills through its Valley Investment Initiative.
·:· ELECTRI CITIES
at N 0 R T H C A R 0 L. I N A, I N C.
NORTH CAROLINA IS A GREAT PLACE TO DO BUSINESSI
In fact, Site Selection magazine ranked North Carolina 2nd in its annual Top Business Climate survey for 2013. So if you 're looking at North Carol1na, let ElectriCities ' Economic Development team illuminate the
way. We represent more than 70 public power communit ies across the state. To help serve you better, contact Brenda Daniels, Manager of Economic Development at 800.768.7697, ext. 6363 or bdaniels@ electricities.org for more information.
CONCORD International Business Park location: 4541 Enterprise Dr., Concord, NC 28027 Building size: 88,527 s.f. expandable up to 141,000 s.f. Year built: 2011 Acreage: 12.8 acres Ceiling height: 28 feet Dock doors: 4
KINSTON Highway 70 West Industrial Park location: 2010 Smithfield Way, Kinston, NC 28504 Building size: 40,000 s.f. expandable to 160,000 s.f. Year built: 2009 Acreage: 9 acres with additional a acres available Ceiling height: 30 fe et Dock doors: 2 dock-high, 1 drive-in Flooring: 10 mil vapor barrier
CONCORD Concord Airport Business Park Location: 7055 Northwinds Dr., Concord, NC 28027 Building size: 150,000 s.f. Year built: under construction Ceiling height 32 fe et clear Dock doors: 20-30 side loa ding Flooring: 6 inch conc rete Adjacent to Concord Regional Airport
22 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
MONROE Monroe Corporate Center location: 447 Goldmine Rd .. Monroe. NC 28 11 0 Building size: 102.000 s.f. Year built: 2013 Ceiling height: 30 feet clear Dock doors: 4 dock-high, 1 drive-in Flooring: Stone
SHELBY
es Walls: Str c a precast concrete 100':'. ESFR
CONCORD Concord Airport Business Park
location: 7035 Northwinds Dr., Concord, NC 28027 Building size: 400,000 s.f. Year built: under construction Ceiling height: 36 feet Dock doors: 40-80 side loading Flooring: 6 inch concrete Adjacent to Concord Regional Ai rport
Creating a Holistic Solution for Manufacturers by Combining Traditional Incentives
In Georgia one local community
combined several traditional incentives
to create a unique solution for an
auto supplier. It floated a tax-exempt
bond, repaying the bond with lease
payments and recaptured tax revenues.
The community used the proceeds
to construct a facility owned by its
Industrial Development Authority (IDA)
and leased it to the manufacturer. The
lease was triple net and resulted in a
savings of $1.25 per square foot, largely
because the implicit cost of funds was
5.63 percent versus 12.0 percent that a
private developer would have to pay.
The triple net lease was a gross rate
in practice because the manufacturer
received property tax abatement from
the taxing authorities, while the IDA
paid for the common area maintenance
and the insurance on the structure.
The iDAsplita$1million
OneGeorgia Authority cash grant with
the manufacturer; $500,000 for tenant
improvements and $500,000 for site
grading and infrastructure development.
Using this project as a template to spur
other development, the community today
touts its economic success by attracting
over $3 billion of new capital investment
and having created 20,000 jobs within the
last 10 years. • • 1"US Manufacturing Nears the Tipping Point - Which lndustnes, Why and How Much?" bcg.perspect1ves, The Boston Consult•ng Group :S,kin, Zi nser, Hohner and Rose, 3/22/1 2)
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
NEW FUEL E'"CONOMY AND GREENHOUSE
GAS REGULATIONS ARE LEADING TO THE
DEMAND FOR NEW MATERIALS AS WELL
AS NEW MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN
METHUDS TO LIGHTWEIGHT VEHICLES.
BY .JOSHUA CREGGER, PRO.JECT MANAGER;
AND GREG SCHROEDER, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR,
MANUFACTURING, ENGINEERING, & TECHNOLOGY:
CENTER FOR A UTDMDmVE RESEARCH
r United tates require that the portfolio of vehicles sold each
model year become increasingly fuel-efficient over time.
These regulations facilitate the use of various fuel economy
irnprming technologies, such as alternative fuels, electrification,
ad\"anced powertrain, energy-efficient peripherals,
aerodynamic improvements, and vehicle lightweightin<>. Let's
examine the national regulations, automotive lighh,·eightino
technologies, and related capital investment needs.
Fuel Economy and Greenhouse Gas Regulation Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) regulations were
first enacted by Congress in 1975 as a policy to increase fuel
SG L Automotive Carbon Fibers production, Moses Lake, Washington
2014
economy of passenger cars and light-duty trucks. In 2009, new
national fuel economy and greenhouse gas (GHG) standards
for vehicles were proposed in the U.S. These new regulations
harmonize the . ational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
1 :HI'SA) CAFE standards and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) GHG regulations. NHTSA is
tasked with regulating fuel economy and EPA is tasked with
regulating GHG emissions- though they are closely related,
meeting one regulation does not guarantee meeting the other
regulation. With harmonization, automakers will be able to
satisfy both sets of regulations.
The first phase of the regulations, which covers vehicle
model years 2012 through 2016, will increase the combined
required CAFE for light-duty vehicles (trucks and passenger
cars) to an estimated 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg) by the end
of that period. This level of fuel economy is a substantial
increase from the previous mandates, which in 2011 required
a combined light-duty vehicle CAFE of 24.1 mpg. Similarly,
the second phase, which covers vehicle model years 2017
through 2025, will increase the CAFE requirement for light
duty vehicles to an estimated 54.5 mpg by the end of that
period.
The national fuel economy and GHG standards have
already had an effect on the design of new vehicles and
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I 2014 23
~ (j)
t :::> 0 u
are poised to have an even greater influence on vehicle
innovation in the near future . For the first time, the
combined CAFE for passenger cars and light duty-trucks
exceeds 30 mpg. (See chart on page 27.)
Automotive Lightweighting Technologies Vehicle weight is a considerable factor in ,·ehide fuel
economy; it is estimated that a 10 percent reduction in vehicle
mass can result in a fuel economy impro,·em of up to 5
Is the U.S. Automotive Sector Really Recovering?
The U.S. auto industry is the world's third-largest, trail"rg o~
powerhouses China and Japan. Since the industry's collapse · 2008, the
U.S. economy has struggled; however, recent industry trends seem to
indicate the $34 billion cash infusion of 2008 to two of the Big 3 industry
players (GM and Chrysler) is beginning to have a broad and positive impact
on the U.S. economy.
Gains in the industry are occurring in places like North Carolina, which
ranks 1Oth among all states in total automotive cluster employment, even
though it doesn't have a single auto assembly plant: 34 of the top 150 North American OEM parts suppliers have
a facility in the state. Its prime East Coast location, a nationally-acclaimed STEM education initiative, engineering
programs at two universities, a nearby independent auto test track, and an available mega-site are a few reasons
why nearly two dozen automotive suppliers call eastern North Carolina home, and several have announced plans to
expand over the past few years.
Expanding OEMs Among these, Keihin Carolina System Technology (KCST) of Tarboro
expanded in 2011, creating 50 new jobs and investing more than
$13 million to expand its 370-employee facility that manufactures engine
control units and electronic assemblies for Honda, Honda Power Sports,
and Acura.
In nearby Goldsboro, Cooper Standard, a leading supplier of body
sealing, fuel, brake and emissions, thermal management, and anti
vibration systems expanded its body and chassis faci lity to accommodate new products and programs. The $17.9
million expansion created 137 new jobs.
Carolina Technical Plastics (CTP , a plastic injection molding plant in New Bern, N.C. , added 25 employees in
2011 and made substantial investments "nto · s plant , ensuring its ability to meet growing consumer demand.
Due to its strict quality standards and superior techn"cal abilities, CTP has been awarded the opportunity to
manufacturer 18 new products for The Brose Group, production that had been housed in Mexico.
And just last year, ASMO, a Japanese-owned manufacturer of front wiper motor li nkages, arms, and blades as
well as radiator fan motors announced plans to create 200 new jobs and invest at least $100 million at its Greenvi lle,
N.C., facility by the end of 2016.
If short-term lessons from major auto manufacturers and a diverse range of suppliers, like those in eastern North
Carolina, are any indication of the future, the U.S. automotive industry and the U.S. economy have a genuine basis
for confidence .
. , _ _________ _______________________________ _
24 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
D A VOTE, THEY'D MOVE HERE.
Numbers don't lie. Iowa has one of the nation's lowest costs of do1ng business. We're a right-to-work state with a cost of living that's below the national average. Ours is an environment built for businesses to prosper. lt"s why our advanced manufacturing exports are up 179%. Why the growth of our bioscience companies has far outpaced the nation. Why we're home to over 94,000 of the nation's most savvy finance and 1nsurance pros. Why our diverse economy is third in the nation in job growth. Dig more into the numbers at iowaeconomicdevelopment.com. With numbers like these, no wonder we're "Iowa Nice".
iowaeconomicdevelopment.com
ICJWA® ec-o om1c- devc.:lopmen+
I) iowaeconomicdevelopment [e1 businessiowa
...
.D :J
0 V1 V1 Q)
a:: s 2
to 7 percent. ' Though achieving greater fuel economy is a
main driver for many lightweighting material and process
technologies, there are other benefits. Weight reduction is also
appealing to automakers because it tends to increase other
performance factors valued by consumers: ride and handling,
braking, and acceleration. Another key motivation for using
new and more highly engineered materials is to improve
vehicle safety and crashworthiness.
IC
By switching to lightweighting materials- such as high
strength steel, aluminum, magnesium, and composites- and
adopting new forming (e.g., hot stamping and high-integrity
casting) and advanced joining (e.g., adhesives, friction stir welding,
fasteners, and laser welding) technologies, automakers will be
able to significantly reduce the weight of new vehicles. By 2025,
automakers are expected to reduce the average vehicle mass by 10
percent or greater versus their 2010 counterparts.
From 1995 to 2010, there were substantial changes in the
a:l >, ' :;: . t
tS I BMW i production at Moses Lake: 120 carbon fiber tows right before they get wound on spools
26 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
materials used to create vehicles. During that time period, there
was increased use of advanced high-stren!rth reel (AHSS),
composites, and aluminum, as well as a decrease in the use of
iron castings and regular (mild) steel. As automakers continue
to implement lightweighting strategies, these material trends
will persist and may even accelerate.
Government and industry are hea\i.l~· in\·esting to support
lightweighting. The states of Michigan and Ohio have leading
research efforts in materials lightweighting. The
recently announced American Lightweight Materials
Manufacturing Innovation Institute (ALMMll), a
public-private partnership and a National Network
for Manufacturing Innovation (NNMI) institute, will
have its main office in Detroit, Michigan, and will
conduct significant activities in Columbus, Ohio.'
The federal government's $70 million contribution
to ALMMll will be matched with at least $78 million
in private funds . ALMMll will focus on the use of
lightweight metals in transportation applications.
In February 2014, the federal government announced that
it would be accepting applications for the creation of another
relevant NNMI institute, which would be focused on advanced
composites manufacturing (primarily focused on carbon fiber
and glass fiber reinforced composites).' As with ALMMll, the
federal government will support the institute with $70 million
to be matched with private funds.
Advanced High-Strength Steel (AHSS) -New AHSS
implementations are developed every year. By using high
trength steel over mild steel, companies can create thinner
components (decreasing vehicle weight) while achieving
the same crash performance, although the adoption of high-
trength steel poses some challenges to the manufacturing
and assembly processes. Third-generation steels are being
developed that are ultra-high strength and more formable than
other AHSS. Unlike some AHSS materials, third-generation
steels do not require a special forming process, such as hot
stamping, and are able be cold-formed like mild steel, thus
using much of the existing steel-based infrastructure in
the industry. Third-generation steels are currently under
development, but could be used in vehicles in the near future.
These third-generation steels are seen as a threat to other
lightweight materials, such as aluminum, due to tl1eir potential
to prmide lightweighting with very little cost penalty.
Alumi -Manufacturers and material providers are also
new alloys and joining technologies to increase the
· urn in vehicles. Replacing steel with aluminum
_ reduce vehicle weight by 35-45 percent. Aluminum
ominant material in powertrain, heat exchangers,
ee . It is also an emerging material for vehicle
'enders and roofs) and closures (e.g., hoods, doors,
::ate . In 2012, 34 percent of hoods on new vehicles
urn, and by 2015 it is expected that 48 percent of
made from aluminum.' In 2012, the average new
vehicle· percent aluminum; aluminum in vehicles is
expected .ncrease to 10.4 percent by 2015.
In Janll<10 201-i, Ford unveiled its 2015 F-150, which is
the first hio- -Yolume aluminum-bodied vehicle to go into
production. The new model is 700 pounds lighter than the
outgoing F-150. Ford is investing $359 million to retool the
Dearborn Rouge River plant body shop, paint hop, and final
assembly to accommodate the change. Following Ford' leari,
other automakers are considering introducing aluminum
bodied vehicles.' According to a recent report from Ducker
40
E' 35 0 c 8 ~ 30 w c -.2 ~ r;; 25 ~~ Cll ._
~ ~ 20
j ~ .... ~ 15 Cll c ..... "' = 10 ... 0 c. ... 0 5 u
0 00 0"\ 0 ..... ,.... ,.... 00 00 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ ..... ..... ..... .....
N CV1 '<t L/') <.0 ,.... 00 0"\ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ 0"\ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
Worldwide, 18 percent of new vehicles will have all aluminum
bodies by 2025, up from less than 1 percent of new vehicles
today.' In the U.S., high-volume pickup trucks are expected to
lead this transformation to aluminum.
Responding to increased demand for aluminum, suppliers
are working to increase capacity. Alcoa, one of the world's largest
producers of aluminum, is investing $300 million to build a new
production line in Davenport, Iowa, and $275 million to add more
capacity at a plant in Alcoa, Tennessee.' Novelis, another producer
of rolled aluminum, has invested $120 million to add new capacity
at a plant in Oswego, New York Other companies such as
Constellium NY, Aleris Corp., and WJSe Metals Group are looking
into making U.S. investments.
Composites- Composites also have great potential for a
variety of applications, as they can be customized by varying
the mix of polymers and reinforcement fibers to meet the
pecifications of particular components. Advancements in
colo , feel soft skin feel), resistance to ultraviolet rays, and
vroper mana~ement of thermal expansion properties have
for many components both
an ou ide the ,-ehicle (fascias, lids, air foils, knobs, and
36.5
28.3
24.5
20.9
, '<tLI')I.Df'.OO 0"\ 0 ..... N m '<t L/') <.0 ,.... 00 0"\ 0 ..... N CV1 '<t CT\0"\ CT\CT\0"\ 0"\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... CT\0"\0"\ CT\CT\ 0"\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'C""'f r1 T""'t M M ..... N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Model Year
-.-Total Combined CAFE -e-Passenger Car CAFE -...- light Truck CAFE
Source: NHTSA 2014
Corporate Average Fuel Economy Summary by Year, 1978-2013
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES I 2014 27
•
other components). A significant portion of the interior seating
and trim involves plastic, rubber, and composites.
Automakers have examined using composite body panels
in their vehicles and, with its excellent strength-to-weight
ratio, there has been particular interest in using carbon-fiber
reinforced composites in vehicle bodies. Such materials have
already been used in Formula 1 racecars, supercars (e.g.,
Bugatti Veyron), and airplanes (e.g., Boeing 787).
IN ORDER TO HANDLE THE NEW L GHTWEIGHTING MATERIALS.
Carbon fiber-reinforced composites are also used in the
BMW i3, which was released in November 2013, and in the
BMW iS, which was released in June 2014. The raw material
is produced in Japan and sent to SGL Automotive Carbon
Fibers (a joint venture plant owned by BMW and SGL Group)
in Moses Lake, Washington, where it is converted into carbon
fiber strands. The carbon fiber strands are sent to Germany,
where they are woven and processed into automotiYe parts
before being shipped to the BMW factory in Leipzig for
final assembly. In May 2014, SGL Automotive Carbon Fibers
announced that, due to the high automotive demand for carbon
fiber, the Moses Lake plant would undergo a $200 million
expansion, tripling its capacity and making it the largest carbon
fiber plant in the world.•
Fanning, Joining, and Modeling -In addition to the materials
themselves, much of the advancement in the automotive materials
relates to manufacturing and design methods. Some of the
biggest developments in materials technology involve application
technologies such as joining (e.g., resistance spot welding, fasteners,
adhesives, weld bond adhesive, laser welding) and fabrication (hot
forming, thin-wall die casting, composite molds, and aluminum
forming) techniques. Material assessment is also important, and
computer-aided engineering (CAE) is used to model new materials
28 ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
(e.g., mold flow analysis, formability, and crash simulations).
Economic Development Opportunities Opportunities to attract investment abound in the current
market. To meet fuel economy and GHG emissions regulations,
automakers will continue to change the material makeup of
their products. The inclusion of these materials in vehicles will
require new investments on the assembly line, as automakers
retool and recalibrate their facilities to handle new
materials. Meanwhile, automotive suppliers, in an
attempt to keep up with higher demand from the
automakers, will continue to expand their existing
plants as well as building entirely new facilities,
just as BMW's demand for carbon fiber and Ford's
demand for aluminum have already led to new
investments in U.S. plants supplying those materials.
Though ligh tweighting is creating some new
opportunities in the material supplier space, there
are many more opportunities in the overall material
supply chain. As materials change, all the parts of the supply
chain must also change. For instance, the areas of design
engineering, prototype development, tooling, fabrication, and
joining will see many opportunities as automakers continue
the push for vehicle lightweighting. Economic developers
will continue to focus on assisting existing companies that are
transitioning to work with new materials that require more
complex engineering, enhanced skills, and R&D support. • •
The Center for Automotive Research (CAR) is a nonprofit organization based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, with more than 40 years of experience in leading industry research and events, as well as developing new methodologies, forecasting industry trends, advising on public policy, and sponsoring multi-stakeholder communication forums .
1 NHTSA. (2012). "Corporate Average Fue Economy for MY 2017-MY 202S Passenger Cars and Light Trucks." National Highway Transportat1on Safety Administration, U.S. Depanment of Transportatton. Pages 435-436. August 2012. 2 ALMMII. (2014}. American Lightwetgh Ma:er a is Manufacturing Innovation InStitUte (almmii.org}. 3 DOE. (201 4) "Clean Energy Manufactunng Innovation Institute for Compos1tes Materials and Structures." Advanced Manufactunng C>Rce Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, US. Department of Energy. February 25, 2014. 4 Ducker. (2014). "2015 North Amencan L•ght eh•cle Aluminum Content Study. Ducker Worldwide for DriveAiuminum, the Aluminum Associatons Aluminum Transportat1on Group. June 2014. s Priddle, Alisa. (2014). "F-150 Is Catalyst as Alummum Goes Mainstream 1n Auto Industry.· Detroit Free Press. July 13,2014. 6 Ducker. (2014). "2015 North American L•ght eh•cle Aluminum Content Study." Ducker Worldwide for DriveAiuminum, the Aluminum Associ a:. on s Aluminum Transportation Group. June 2014 7 Martell, Allison and Mason, Joseph1ne '201 o! Alcoa and Novel is Steel For Next Test •n Aluminum Auto Race.n Reuters. June 19,2014 8 BMW (2014). "BMW Group and SGL Group to Tnple Production Capacities at Moses Lake Carbon Fiber Plant." BMW Group. May9, 2014.
ADVANCED INDUSTRIES
DIRECT INVESTMENT IN NORTH AMERICA
IS ALLOWING EUROPEAN AUTOMOTIVE
COMPANIES TO DISTINGUISH THEMSELVES
FROM THEIR COMPETITORS.
B Y DAVID LEvERETT, CONSULTANT PARTNER, HMC GLOBAL
The recent resurgence in direct investment in orth America by European automotive manufacturers
is hardly surprising. Continued flat sales projections
and production inflexibility in Europe have forced the
industry outward to livelier markets. China and other large
developing regions are obvious targets given their dramatic
recent economic expansion and continued expectations of
strong increases in transport demand and discretionary
spending. As European automotive brands are well reaarded
in the e markets, they certainly have the potential to
aenerate attractive margins that can no longer be achie\·ed
at home. But these fast-growing, younger markets rin
with them certain risks. Political uncertainty, currency
instability, inconsistent regulatory environments, wear le al
protections, and unreliable distribution infrastructures are
just some of the issues that can quickly turn overseas direct
investment into a loss-making affair.
2014
These risks are particularly acute for the closely
integrated and infrastructure-sensitive production chains
of the European automotiYe industry. Long-term strategic
alliance "ith upplier , an environment supportive of
acti\·e product de,·elopment, and heavy dependence on
a broadly educated and highly engaged workforce are all
defining elements of the European approach to automotive
manufacturing. Duplicating (or even just approximating)
this productive but complex relationship outside of
Europe requires educational, legal, and labor structures
that simply do not exist in many developing markets.
European manufacturers have discovered over the last
few years (often the hard way) that basing production site
decisions primarily on projected host-market growth and/
or low production costs is unlikely to result in creating the
manufacturing environment they require.
Some Options In short, the traditional model of overseas production
siting, based primarily on chasing market growth and/ or
low production costs, has proved too unstable for European
automotive firms defined by their more long-term strengths of
branding and product innovation. Production investments in
high-growth markets with underdeveloped legal and business
A D VAN CED INDUSTRIES I 2014 29
frastructures have all
ax:~ often resulted in grand
::-rofits being marginalized
i:>:· unpredictable "local
Key Attractors for European Automotive FDI in the USA·
years as an important factor
in their production site
selection. The top seven
95% 8"3%...;
75%
results are illustrated in the
accompanying chart c ts of doing business,"
_uch as inconsistently
applied regulations (both
in staffing and trade), lack
of IP protection, restrictive
m-vnership and profit rules,
and insufficient control of
production quality.
Market Tramable Immediate Academ1c Export Forward- Lower
Even just 10 years ago
that list, for most companies,
would have had only two
elements: market potential
and lower cost And thus,
most of the European
automotive firms that
Potential and Vertical and Support Infrastructure Think1ng Costs Adaptive Horizontal System Tax
Workforce Support for R&D Enwonment nfrastructure
Pu1dformostEuropean
manufacturers, retreating back
to solely producing at home
* %based on times included in the top-3 motivat ions for U.S. FDI, as publicly announced by European automotive firms and their representatives (201 0-2013)
chose to develop offshore
production were making
their calculations based on
is simply not an option. Relatively high production costs and
general rigidity in the local manufacturing infrastructure make
it impossible for European-based firms to competitively cater
to the world's demand for their products by export alone. This
condition is further exacerbated by the increased tendency
of many developing countries with high market potential
to actively discourage imports in what they see as critical or
lucrative manufacturing industries.
But in North America, European automotive firms find
a business and legal environment that has maturity and
stability equal to their own, but with greater operational
flexibility and projected market growth. Pu1d the adYanced
infrastructural support in much of 1orth America
encourages many European automoti\'e firms to employ
a more complex mix of tangible and intangible factors
when evaluating potential production sites. Thus, more
value can be placed on production factors that promote
long-term presence, such as the ability to maintain a skilled
and adaptable workforce, access to a modern support and
distribution infrastructure, strong legal protections, R&D
support, a stable political and economic environment, and
responsive capital markets.
A recent report commissioned by HMC Global, a
leading foreign direct investment consultancy, ranked the
key attractors for European automotive firms choosing
to produce in North America. This information is based
on the times each indicator was publicly announced by
manufacturers and their representatives over the last three
30 A D VANC ED INDUSTRIES
similar assumptions and weightings. That is not to claim
that the members of Europe's automotive industry have
operated as a monolithic enti ty, pursuing identical objectives
and utilizing identical methodologies. But, historically,
these firms have faced relatively little latitude in production
mechanisms in their heavily regulated home markets. Pu1d
until recently, overseas production siting decisions by these
firms have been dominated by the rather straightforward
combination of seeking high regional growth and low
production costs. Thus, facing very similar circumstances,
these firms unsurprisingly often pursued very similar paths.
Defining Choices But firms now recognize the importance of these broader
metrics to the success of their overseas productions and are
actively tailoring the mix to better suit tl1eir increasingly
divergent strategies. Where Fiat may place greater value on
buying into traditional U.S. industry infrastructure and local
brands, BMW finds the export links supporting its South
Carolina operations vital to the plant's success and its overall
global strategy. MalUe places a heavy weighting on good access
to a trainable and adapti\'e workforce, while ContiTech's siting
strategy focuses on supporting both its automotive and non
automotive segments. These firms, their objectives, and even
their methods can no longer be painted in a single hue. They
are each distilling the factors that have made their companies
successful and looking for ways to constructively introduce
those elements into their overseas production.
I
MaraOIS desarrolladora
EXICO'S CENTER FOR BUSINESS & INDUSTRY Build to Suit Facilities for Lease or Sale I Land for Sale I Design Build
~ ~~PARaue ~ TECNOINOUBT RIAL
CASTRO DEL RfO Within the past eight years , 57 companies- including more than 45 international firms- have set up shop in CDR, the largest private industrial park in the state of Guanajuato
• Premium utility infrastructure with available, expandable sites
• More than 700,000 people live within a 15-mile radius, providing a young, qualified workforce at a competitive cost
• A public institution CCONALEP) can train technicians on-site
• 17 miles from the GM plant and 21 miles from the VW engines plant in Silao
• 18 miles from the Mazda plant in Salamanca
• 42. 5 miles from the Honda plant in Celaya
• . ', ~ 6 o rs • or1 eas and west coast seaports
a c 9 ~ rs · om he U.S. border
Marao1s aoasolo Located in Abasolo, also in the state of Guanajuato, Marabis Abasolo is only 40 minutes away from CDR, with the same world-class infrastructure that international companies are looking for to run a successful industrial manufacturing operation
Me xican Standard for In d u I t rI a I I' or k s
: www.castrodelrio.com.mx ~ • <
.:~ .. .. ~ . ">' ~ • ~-~- -
And it is the distributed nature of business governance
in North America that is enabling European firms to
create a more tailored fit for their specific production site
requirements. Automotive manufacturing in North America
has now expanded well beyond the traditional bases in the
Midwest states, with Canada, Mexico, and all continental
U.S. regions seeing growth in greenfield investment over
the last few years. Each nation, each state, even each city
or borders. With recent announcements about BMW and
Daimler beginning production in Mexico, soon all European
automakers producing in North America will have major
production sites in at least two of the region's three nations.
Component suppliers are also following the trend.
European automotive firms are openly embracing the
or county can offer different approaches and advantages,
giving interested firms the opportunity to better match a
location to its operating objectives, structure, and practices.
wide range of siting choices available in North America and
carefully building production capability that suits multiple
strategic objectives beyond simply boosting the bottom line.
This approach is doing more than just helping these companies
improve the probability of success in their overseas direct
investments. It is providing them with new opportunities to
fundamentally distinguish themselves from their competitors
-not just at the marketing and branding level, but also at the
very heart of any manufacturing firm, i.e., in production and
development. Firms that have a clear understanding of this
will be well positioned to make the most of the automotive
production environments developing in North America. • •
This process is further advancing in complexity as firms
build broad integrated production networks across multiple
states and nations in the region. They are increasingly
relying on the excellent communications and transport
infrastructures in North America to pick and choose the best
mix of sites for the various elements of the production chain
-while showing less and less regard for distance and/
ALABAMA C3 AIDT The Alabama Robotic Technology Park is Alabama's premier training center tasked with providing highly advanced training specifically for robotics and automation technologies. The RTP consists of three individual training faciltties -each targeted to a specific industry need: The Robotics Maintenance Center, the Advanced Technology Research and De;elopment Center, and the Integration, Entrepreneurial and Paint/Dispense Training Center. Rick Maroney
SPONSORS DIRECTORY
MISSISSIPPI C2 Mississippi Development Authority Opportunity is abundant in Mississippi. A growing list of global companies and entrepreneurs call Mississippi home. The state's strategic location offers easy access to U.S. markets, and recent tax and energy reform add to Mississippi's growth capacity. Find out why Mississippi is ranked one of the top states to do business at mississippi.org. Dat>id Ramsey Global Bu;in£" D" ., - ::>~ ; •
Alabama Robotic Technology Park [!]~~~.~J!l 6505 US Hwy 31, Tanner, Al35671 P.O. Box 849, ac so 256-642-2600 [!],. . 601-359-3155
s 39205
[email protected] • www.alabamartp.org [email protected] • www.mississippi.org
IOWA ~ Iowa Economic DevelopmentAuthority(IEDA) The Iowa Economic Development Authority (IEDA) is a publicprivate partnership endorsed by the Governor and Iowa legislature. We focus on educating start-up companies and helping existing companies become more innovative while retaining and attracting companies that are creating jobs. Our role is to make Iowa a great place for business. Debi V Durham, Director Iowa Economic Development Authority 200 E. Grand Ave. Des Moines, lA 50309 515-725-3000. 515-725-3010 [email protected]
~ ~
http:/ /www.iowaeconomicdevelopment.com/
KENTUCKY ~ Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Development Kentucky is open for business. Whether your company is looking for an ideal location, competitive utility rates, a highly skilled labor pool, or flexible workforce development programs. Kentucky is the choice for companies to do business. Explore the many advantages of the Commonwealth and you'll find Kentucky will go the extra mile to exceed your needs. Mandy Lambert, Commissioner, Business Development Kentucky Cabinet for Economic Droelopment Old Capital Annex • 300 W. Broadway Frankfort, KY 40601
~i~ a [email protected] • www.ThinkKentucky.com
32 ADVANCEDINDUSTRIES
NORTH CAROLINA 22 ElectriCities of North Carolina, Inc. ElectriCities is a not-for-profit government service organization representing 70+ NC cities and universities that own electric distribution systems. A site selection professional can receive detailed reports from our extensive databases on dozens of NC sites, from mountains to coast within 48 hours of a request. We're your turnkey services partner. Brenda Daniels, Manager, Economic Droelopment ElectriCities of North Carolina, hzc. 1427 Meadow Wood Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604 1-800-7 68-7 697 ext. 6363 [email protected] • www.electricities.com
7 NCEast Alliance The CEast Alliance is a regional economic development corporation serving approximately one million residents within several small metropolitan and micropolitan areas from the fringe of the Research Triangle to the Atlantic Coast. The Alliance provides community capacity building and provides companies with location and expansion assistance including identification of available sites and buildings. Kathy Howard, Vice President, Client & Workforce Droelopment NCEast Alliance 3802 Hwy. NC 58 N. • Kinston, NC 28504 252-522-2400 • Fax: 252-523-9017 [email protected] • www.nceast.org
[!]~· ~ .. 0
[!] 00'
OHIO 19 JobsOhio Ohio is the only state in the nation now posttioned to capitalize on the economic game-changers that experts say will drive future prospertty in the global marketplace. The catalysts, including shale energy, big data, advanced manufacturing, talent, and infrastructure, are already making a difference for category-leading national and international businesses that now call Ohio home. JobsOhio 614-224-6446 [email protected] www.jobs-ohio.com
OKLAHOMA 15 MidAmerica Industrial Park MidAmerica. Oklahoma's largest industrial park, is located at "America 's Crossroads" and offers a robust infrastructure, shovel-read! s es, exceptional incentives, and three on-site training ce"ters at no cost. Home to E.l. duPont, Siemens, Goog'e and other Fortune 500 companies. Ted A:: .· ... , CEcD, Director of Economic Droelopment MidA ?Irlca Industrial Park P.O. Box 945 • Pryor Creek, OK 74362-0945 918-825-3500 or 888-627-3500 teda [email protected] wvv"rr'w ,..,..a p.com
MEXICO 31 Castro del Rio Technolndustrial Park
~~ ~1.~
To date 57 companies have located in Parque Technolndustrial Cas ro de q o (CDR) in the state of Guanajuato, providing a you g ua 1ty work force with on-site training, a premium
· ':) · "'•astructure, and close proximity to automotive asserrb a d supplier plants. Marabis Abasolo, featuring same qua ltty infrastructure, is only 40 minutes away from CDR. Castro del Rio Teclmolndustrial Park Carretera Federal Km. 125+250 Tramo lrapuato-Silao Rio Danubio No. 845, C.P. 36810 lrapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico 52 462 623 4968 [email protected] www.castrodelrio.com.mx
The Alabama Robotics Technology Park (RTP) The Alabama RTP's mission is to provide a technically trained, highly skilled, and educated workforce for automation and robotics, to assist public and private entities in developing new robotics systems and technologies, and to promote the creation, growth, and expansion of companies through innovative technology
solutions.
The Alabama RTP features industry-specific training in areas like:
Robotic Systems (Material Handling, Weld, Paint/Dispense)
• Advanced Manufacturing Line (?-Robots, 3-PLC's, 4-Visions)
• Overhead Cranes
• Forklift Safety OSHA Classes ( 1 0 hour and 30 hour )
8 70E Arc Flash Safety
AIDT ISO 9001 : 2008
-- - - -
ROBO TICS TECHNOLOGY PARK
ALABAMA I ............
. www.alabamaRTP.org
--1 I
I \ \ ' .......... -
__ -----"["' _------ --7 __
RTP~ ol-\un""'\"" Tanner, "'L \-6-S
Birmi"2"""' \-"10 \
\..()5
--------
---
' ' ' '
There are 4.7 million barrels of Bourbon aging in Kentucky- the largest inventory since the 1980s.
Meaning there are more barrels of Bourbon in Kentucky than people
Kentucky produces enough Post-ite notes in one year to circle the globe over
98 times
It takes about 188 billion peanuts to equal the amount of Jite peanut butter produced
annually in Kentucky
Kentucky produces 38 million pounds of Mini Babybele and Laughing Cowe cheese,
which is equivalent to the weight of 25,333 Holstein cows
Louisville, Kentucky supplies kitchens around the entire world with
Reynolds Wrape aluminum foil
Corning's Kentucky plant developed the process and made the forst run of Corninge
Gorillae Glass, now used n more than 1,000 product models, and more than 1.5 billion devtces worldwide
Kentucky produced over one million cars and light trucks in
2012, more than enough to line up from Seattle, Washington to
Miami, Florida
Kentucky produces enough Dippin' Dotse ice cream annually
to fill nearly five Olympic-size swimming pools
MAKING QUALITY PRODUCTS FOR OVER 200 YEARS
Kentucky's most recent manufacturing GOP growth rate was 10.7 percent,
the third highest in the nation. With growth like that, what better reason IS there to locate or relocate yo
business in Kentucky? We're withm 600 miles of 65 percent of the U.S. population, IT'aking us a logistical cream to
move your products to all corners of the world. Visit ThinkKentucky.com to exptore the mar., options Kentucky ho as for you.
ThinkKentucky.com I (800) 625-.:.'930