transferring yesterdays methods to tomorrows technology: the

25
Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The Evolution from HPLC to UPLC TM Eric S. Grumbach Thomas E. Wheat Chuck Phoebe Joe Arsenault Jeffrey R. Mazzeo Diane M. Diehl

Upload: doanngoc

Post on 02-Feb-2017

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

Transferring Yesterdays Methodsto Tomorrows Technology:

The Evolution from HPLC to UPLCTM

Eric S. Grumbach

Thomas E. Wheat

Chuck Phoebe

Joe Arsenault

Jeffrey R. Mazzeo

Diane M. Diehl

Page 2: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

UPLC™ TECHNOLOGY

• A new class of separation science• Based on chromatography columns with very small particles• Based on instruments designed to take advantage of the small

particles

• Provides improved Resolution, Speed, and Sensitivity without compromise

• Suitable for chromatographic applications in general• Appropriate for developing new methods• Appropriate for improving existing methods

Page 3: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Minutes2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00

HPLC vs. UPLCTM

Speed, Sensitivity and Resolution

2.1 x 150 mm, 5 µmRs (2,3) = 4.29

12 3

HPLC

20.00

0.26

Abs

orba

nce

at 2

70 n

m

0.00

Minutes0.40 0.80 1.20 1.60 2.00 2.50

2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µmRs (2,3) = 4.281

23

8X Speed3.4X SensitivitySame Resolution

0.26

Abs

orba

nce

at 2

70 n

m

0.00

UPLCTM

Faster, More Sensitive Methods

Minutes0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00

3

2.1 x 100 mm, 1.7 µmRs (2,3) = 6.38

1

2

4.5X Speed2X Sensitivity1.5X Resolution

4.50

0.26

Abs

orba

nce

at 2

70 n

m

0.00

UPLCTM

Faster, More Sensitive, Higher Resolution Methods

Page 4: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

What Does Ultra Performance LC™ Bring to the Chromatographic Laboratory?

Choices available:• Increased speed and sensitivity

with the same resolution

• Increased sensitivity and speed with resolution

• Increased resolution and sensitivity at the same speed

Speed Resolution

Sensitivity

Page 5: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

HPLC to Optimized UPLC™

Abso

rban

ce 2

54 n

m

Minutes0 10 20 30

1

23

Abso

rban

ce 2

54 n

m

Minutes0 2.6 5.2

1

23

HPLC

Optimized UPLC™

Magnification ofOptimized UPLC™

Abso

rban

ce 2

54 n

m

Minutes0 10 20 30

1

23

An Example of aSuccessful Method Transfer

Page 6: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Methods Transfer Considerations

• Classes of methods transfer– Replace a column brand with another– Replace an instrument with another– Replace both the instrument and the column

• The benefits of UPLC™ can only be realized with a new column on a new instrument

• As with any project to transfer a Liquid Chromatographic method, proper consideration of all the factors which control the separation process is essential for success

Page 7: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

UPLCTM Column SelectionInternal diameter and length

• Internal diameter2.1 mm or 1.0 mm

• Length– If primary goal is speed, choose 50 mm length – If primary goal is resolution, choose 100 mm length

Page 8: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Ratio of Column Length to Particle Size

If you keep the L/dp ratio the SAME for 2 columns, you will obtain the SAME Resolution. With smaller particle sizes in shorter columns, you will achieve the same separation, but in LESS TIME!

100mm1.7µm

300mm10 µm = 30,000

30,000150mm =5µm100mm =3µm 33,300

50mm1.7µm

= 29,500

= 58,820

1970’s ~ 30+ min.

1990’s ~ 5-10 min.

2004 ~1- 2 min.

1980’s ~10-15 min.

L/dp RATIO Typical

Run Times

2x Maximum Resolution Capability

Page 9: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

UPLCTM Column SelectionLigand Selection

Available Ligands:• ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C18

– Straight chain alkyl C18

• ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH Shield RP18

– Embedded polar group (carbamate)

• ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C8

– Straight chain alkyl C8

• ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH Phenyl

Why Multiple Ligands?:• Changes in hydrophobicity

• Changes in silanol activity

• Changes in hydrolytic stability

• Changes in ligand density

• Changes in selectivity

Page 10: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Reversed-Phase Column Selectivity Chart

Retentivity(ln [k] acenaphthene)

012005

SunFire ™ C18

YMC-Pack™ PolymerC18™

Hypersil® CPS Cyano

YMC-Pack™ CN

Waters Spherisorb® S5 P

Hypersil® BDS PhenylNova-Pak® Phenyl

YMC-Pack™ Phenyl

Hypersil® PhenylInertsil® Ph-3

YMC-Pack™ Pro C4™

YMCbasic™

Symmetry® C8YMC-Pack™ Pro C8™

Nova-Pak® C8

XTerra® MS C18 Symmetry® C18

YMC-Pack™ Pro C18™

Inertsil® ODS-3

YMC-Pack™ ODS-A™

Nova-Pak®C18

YMC J'sphere™ODS–L80 Nucleosil® C18

Waters Spherisorb® ODS2

Waters Spherisorb® ODS1Resolve® C18

µBondapak™ C18

YMC-Pack™ ODS–AQ™

YMC J'sphere™ ODS–H80YMC J'sphere™ ODS–M80

Inertsil® CN-3

Waters Spherisorb® S5CN

Nova-Pak® CN HP

SymmetryShield™ RP8

SymmetryShield™ RP18

XTerra® RP8

XTerra® RP18

-0.6

-0.3

0

0.3

0.6

0.9

1.2

1.5

1.8

2.1

2.4

2.7

3

3.3

3.6

-1.5 -0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5

Sele

ctiv

ity(ln

[α] a

mitr

ipty

line/

acen

apht

hene

)

XTerra® MS C8

Luna ®C18 (2)

ACQUITY UPLC™ BEH C18

XTerra ®Phenyl Luna ™

Phenyl Hexyl

ChromolithTM

RP-18

Atlantis® dC18

Zorbax® XDB C18ACT Ace® C18

Zorbax® SB C18

SunFire ™ C8

Luna®C8 (2)

ACQUITY UPLC™ Shield RP18

ACQUITY UPLC™ BEH C8

ACQUITY UPLC™ BEH Phenyl

Page 11: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Method Transfer Consideration

• Solvent delivery– Scale flow rate appropriate to column dimensions– Scale linear velocity appropriate to particle size– Adjust all segments of method, including equilibration

• Sample injection– Scale injection volume

• Detection– Ensure proper data sampling rate– Ensure proper time constant

Page 12: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Original Gradient Profile

1

1

6

*

Curve

9551.5152

5951.5304

9551.5203

5951.50Initial

%B%AFlow Rate

Time Since Injection

Gradient Step

4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm HPLC Column

Page 13: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Target Conditions –Gradient Profile

• Express gradient duration in % change per column volume (cv) units

• Calculate each segment as a number of column volumes

• Calculate time required to deliver the same number of column volumes to the UPLCTM column at the chosen flow rate.

Page 14: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Express Gradient Segments (Steps) in Units of Column Volumes

For 15 min at 1.5 mL/min on a 4.6 x 150 mm column

Gradient Volume = Flow Rate x Time = 1.5 mL/min x 15 min = 22.5 mL

Column Volume = π x r2 x L = 3.14 x 2.32 x 150 = 2.49 mL

Gradient Duration (cv) = Gradient VolumeColumn Volume

Gradient Duration = 22.5 mL2.49 mL

= 9.03 cv

Page 15: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Original Gradient Profile for Scaling

1

1

6

*

Curve

10

5

15

0

Segment Duration

(min)

9.039551.5152

6.025951.5304

3.019551.5203

05951.50Initial

Segment Duration (Col.Vol.)

%B%AFlow

RateTime Since

InjectionGradient

Step

4.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm HPLC Column

Page 16: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Estimate Optimum UPLC™ Flow Rate

Consider 1.7 µm target particle (2.1 mm i.d. column)Assume temperature and viscosity transferredAdjust flow rate based on van Deemter curve and

approximate molecular weight

~0.6 mL/min for average 500 dalton (molecular weight) molecules

~0.1 mL/min for larger molecules because diffusion is slower, e.g., ~2,000 dalton peptides

Page 17: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Scaling Gradient Step Time for UPLC™ Flow Rate - Maintain Duration (cv)

Original Step 2: 15 min @ 1.5 mL/min with Duration of 9.03cv

Calculate Target Step 2: (keeping duration @ 9.03cv)

Target Column Volume (2.1 x 50) = 0.17 mL

Gradient Step Volume = Duration (cv) x Target Column Volume

= 9.03cv x 0.17 mL = 1.54 mL

Gradient Step Time = Gradient Step Volume / UPLC™ Flow Rate

= 1.54 mL / 0.60 mL/min. =

2.6 min.

Page 18: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Optimized Gradient Profile

0015950.60InitialHold

1

1

6

*

Curve

1.74

0.87

2.61

0

Segment Duration

(min)

9.039550.62.612

6.025950.65.224

3.019550.63.483

05950.60Initial

Segment Duration (Col.Vol.)

%B

%A

Flow Rate

Time Since

Injection

Gradient

Step

2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm UPLCTM Column

Page 19: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Comparing Results:Does the new method meet resolution criteria?

4.6 x 150 mmResolution 1/2 = 12Resolution 2/3 = 28

Abs

orba

nce

254

nm

Minutes

12

3

0 10 20 30

Abs

orba

nce

254

nm

Minutes0 10 20 30

1

23 UPLC™ optimized 2.1 x 50 mm

Resolution 1/2 = 11Resolution 2/3 = 26

Page 20: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Comparing Results:Does the new method meet resolution criteria?

4.6 x 150 mm, 5µmResolution 1/2 = 12Resolution 2/3 = 28

Abs

orba

nce

254

nm

Minutes

12

3

0 10 20 30UPLC™ optimized 2.1 x 50 mm

Resolution 1/2 = 11Resolution 2/3 = 26

Abs

orba

nce

254

nm

Minutes0 2.6 5.2

1

23

Page 21: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Original HPLC Method:Caffeic Acid Derivatives in Echinacea Purpurea

Chromatographic Conditions :Columns: XTerra® MS C18 4.6 x 150 mm, 5.0 µmMobile Phase A: 0.1% CF3COOH in H2OMobile Phase B: 0.08% CF3COOH in ACNFlow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Gradient: Time Profile Curve

(min) %A %B0.0 92 8 62.0 92 8 732.0 50 50 635.0 10 90 636.0 92 8 641.0 92 8 6

Injection Volume: 10.0 µLWeak Needle Wash: 0.1% CF3COOH in 8% ACNSample: Caffeic Acid Derivatives in Echinacea PurpureaSample Diluent: 50:50 H2O: MeOH with 0.05% CF3COOH Sample Concentration: 100 µg/mLTemperature: 40 oCDetection: UV @ 330 nmSampling rate: 10 pts/secTime Constant: 0.1Instrument: Alliance® 2695 Separations Module with

2996 PDA detector

Analyte1. Caftaric acid2. Chlorogenic acid3. Cynarin4. Echinacoside5. Cichoric acid

AU

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

Minutes0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00

1 24

5

3

AU

-0.001

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

Minutes0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00

Enhanced BaselineE.G.

35 min.

Page 22: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

HPLC-to-UPLCTM Method Transfer:Chromatographic Conditions

Chromatographic Conditions :Columns: XTerra® MS C18 4.6 x 150 mm, 5.0 µmMobile Phase A: 0.1% CF3COOH in H2OMobile Phase B: 0.08% CF3COOH in ACNFlow Rate: 1.0 mL/min Gradient: Time Profile Curve

(min) %A %B0.0 92 8 62.0 92 8 7

32.0 50 50 635.0 10 90 636.0 92 8 641.0 92 8 6

Injection Volume: 10.0 µLSample: Caffeic Acid Derivatives in Echinacea PurpureaSample Diluent: 50:50 H2O: MeOH with 0.05% CF3COOH Sample Concentration: 100 µg/mLTemperature: 40 oCDetection: UV @ 330 nmSampling rate: 10 pts/secTime Constant: 0.1Instrument: Alliance® 2695 Separations Module with

2996 PDA detector

Chromatographic Conditions :Columns: ACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C18 2.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µmMobile Phase A: 0.1% CF3COOH in H2OMobile Phase B: 0.08% CF3COOH in ACNFlow Rate: 0.5 mL/min Gradient: Time Profile Curve

(min) %A %B0.0 92 8 60.1 92 8 7

4.45 50 50 64.86 10 90 65.0 92 8 66.0 92 8 6

Injection Volume: 1.0 µLWeak Needle Wash: 0.1% CF3COOH in 8% ACNSample: Caffeic Acid Derivatives in Echinacea PurpureaSample Diluent: 50:50 H2O: MeOH with 0.05% CF3COOH Sample Concentration: 100 µg/mLTemperature: 40 oCDetection: UV @ 330 nmSampling rate: 40 pts/secTime Constant: 0.1Instrument: Waters ACQUITY UPLCTM, with TUV detector

Original HPLC Method Final UPLCTM Method

Page 23: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

AU

Minutes0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00

HPLC-to-UPLCTM Method Transfer:Caffeic Acid Derivatives in Echinacea Purpurea

AU

Minutes0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Final UPLCTM Method = 5 minACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C182.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm

Original HPLC Method = 35 minXTerra® MS C184.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

5

35.00

5.00

Page 24: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

HPLC-to-UPLCTM Method Transfer:Caffeic Acid Derivatives in Echinacea Purpurea

AU

-0.001

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

Minutes0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 16.00 18.00 20.00 22.00 24.00 26.00 28.00 30.00 32.00 34.00

au

-0.001

0.000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

Minutes

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00

Original HPLC Method = 35 minXTerra® MS C184.6 x 150 mm, 5 µm

Final UPLCTM Method = 5 minACQUITY UPLCTM BEH C182.1 x 50 mm, 1.7 µm

35.00

5.00

Page 25: Transferring Yesterdays Methods to Tomorrows Technology: The

©2005 Waters Corporation

Conclusions

• Methods can be moved directly from HPLC to ACQUITY UPLC™• Improved resolution• Improved speed• Improved detectability

• Many parameters can and must be transferred to preserve results

• Attention to detail leads to success