transcanada technology innovations - · pdf filetranscanada technology innovations ... apply...
TRANSCRIPT
TRANSCANADA TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONSAustralian Pipeline Industry Association SeminarMay 22, 2008 Brisbane
May 16, 2008TransCanada2
Leading North American energy company
• Competitively positioned in pipeline and energy infrastructure
• Almost $26 billion of premium pipeline and energy assets ($Cdn at Dec. 31, 2006, excludes ANR)
• Employ approximately 3,550 people in nearly 50 professions, trades and fields
• Strong financial position
TransCanada Introduction
May 16, 2008TransCanada3
• approx. 59,000 km (36,500 miles) of wholly owned pipeline.
• transports 15 billion cubic feet/day (Bcf/d) from virtually all major supply basins on the continent.
• 2,969 km of proposed oil pipeline, capable of transporting 590,000 barrels per day.
• 16 power facilities with 7,700 megawatts of power generation.
• two proposed liquefied natural gas facilities total capacity 1.5 Bcf/d.
• significant gas storage capacity in Canada and the United States, 360 Bcf.
TransCanada - Extensive Energy Network
May 16, 2008TransCanada5
Technology Implementation• X100 pipe technology• Alternative Integrity Validation (AIV)• High Productivity Welding• High Performance Composite Coating (HPCC)• Composite Reinforced Line Pipe ( CRLP)• Gas Transport Module (GTM) Pressure Vessel
MarineRoad transportationStorage
TransCanada Technologies
May 16, 2008TransCanada6
• TransCanada use the technologies to drive down the cost to the benefit of shipper and has a staged process for technology development
Concept and feasibility study
Fundamental technology development
Controlled field implementation
Standard practices
• Controlled implementation of technologies in Stittsville and Deux Rivieres projects
Install 5.5 km X100 pipe in Stittsville project
Fully implement AIV in Deux Rivieres project
Apply tandem welding and mechanized tie-in welding for both
Use HPCC as the baseline coating
Technology Implementation Program
May 16, 2008TransCanada8
• Installed 7.3km in Class 3 Locations in Stittsville project
5.3km supplied by JFE Steel2km supplied by IPSCO
• Significant accomplishmentGained NEB acceptanceEnhanced understanding on production capability and property consistencyImproved confidence in quality consistencyIncreased construction experience
X100 Pipe Technology
May 16, 2008TransCanada9
• AIV is an alternative to post-construction hydrotest to demonstrate pipeline integrity.
• Plan to implement AIV on both Stittsville and Deux Rivieres
Stittsville Loop was hydrotested as plannedWaiver of hydrotest for Deux Rivieres was approved by NEB
• First successful NEB waiver for onshore pipelineSubstantial benefits in environmental protection and cost savingsContinue to develop AIV process for regular and large scale applications
Alternative Integrity Validation (AIV)
May 16, 2008TransCanada10
• Mainline welding used a higher productivity mechanized GMAW with twin wire systems (tandem) to achieve higher productivity
• Tie-in welding with utilize mechanized FCAW and manual welding
• Apply to both Stittsville and Deux Rivieres
• Welding went generally well
High Productivity Welding
May 16, 2008TransCanada13
Composite Reinforced Pressure VesselTechnology
Resin
Steel Pipe and Heads
Glass Fiber
CRLP™ & GTM™ - Manufactured under license from NCF Industries, Inc. US & Foreign Patents Issued & Pending
The Gas Transport Module Technology
5/16/2008TransCanada14
Steel Liner
Primer
Composite Reinforcement
Outer-protection
Composite Reinforced Line Pipe (CRLP)
CRLP™ & GTM™ - Manufactured under license from NCF Industries, Inc. US & Foreign Patents Issued & Pending
May 16, 2008TransCanada15
1972 Swimmer delivery vehicle
1975 Fireman’s breathing apparatus
1975 Mountain climber’s oxygen tanks
1981 Natural gas vehicle storage tank
1986 Pipeline repair sleeves (ClockSpring®)
1991 Natural gas pipeline trial installation (Enron)
1996 TransCanada Due Diligence Study
1998 Pipe Replacement Installation (100 m)
2001 Two 24” projects ( 2kms, 50 m)
2002 One 48” project (100 m)
CRLP Historical Development
May 16, 2008TransCanada16
• Analysis and design methodologies
• Ultimate pressure capacity
• Fracture arrest capability
• Mechanical damage resistance
• Constructability
• Long-term performance
• Corrosion resistance
• Field trials
TransCanada Studies
May 16, 2008TransCanada17
• Excellent fracture arrest
• Resistance to mechanical damage
• Factor of safety on burst > 2.0
Safety Advantages
May 16, 2008TransCanada20
Material
- up to 10% less than all-steel
Transportation and Handling
- 40% weight savings
Construction
- Reduced handling costs due to lower weight
- Welding savings
Cost Savings
May 16, 2008TransCanada21
%Total Project
Savingsfrom CRLP
Net ProjectSavings
Pipe Costs
Transportation
Welding
Total: 7% - 8%
40 % 10 % 4.0 %
8 % 20 % 1.6 %
10 % 20 % 2.0 %
Net Project Cost Savings
May 16, 2008TransCanada22
1.2 - 2.70.3Poisson’s ratio
7 - 9 x 10-6/°C12 x 10-6/°CThermal exp.
2%>20%Ultimate strain
48,000 MPa207,000 MPaElastic modulus
483 - 1034 MPa485 - 655 MPaUltimate strength
n.a.414 - 559 MPaYield strength
Composite WrapSteel PipeMaterial Property
Material Properties
May 16, 2008TransCanada23
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5%
Strain
Stre
ss
X70 steel pipe
composite reinforcement
Typical Stress-Strain Curves
May 16, 2008TransCanada24
0
10
20
30
40
50
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000Hoop Stress (MPa)
Inte
rnal
Pre
ssur
e (M
Pa)
composite
steel
Hydrostatic Test
May 16, 2008TransCanada25
0
10
20
30
40
50
-200 0 200 400 600 800 1000Hoop Stress (MPa)
Inte
rnal
Pre
ssur
e (M
Pa)
composite
steel
Operating Stresses
May 16, 2008TransCanada26
Test Objectives:
1. Constructability in North
2. Cold weather bending, joining
3. Long-term performance
4. Validate manufacturing process
5. Confirm cost savings
Buffalo Creek Pilot
May 16, 2008TransCanada29
1. Long-term performance
2. Constructability
3. Bending, joining
4. Long-term corrosion resistance and performance
Russell Creek Test Objectives
May 16, 2008TransCanada31
• First spiral weld composite wrapped 48”pipe
• Composite designed for pressure capability
• Constructability
• Joining capability
• Long term performance
Saratoga CRLP™ Objectives
May 16, 2008TransCanada33
• CRLP a viable technology for many pipeline
applications
• Successful results of current field studies will
expedite use
• Canadian Standards Association – Pipeline Systems
Z662 Approval in 2007
Conclusions
May 16, 2008TransCanada34
• Small market for CRLP
• Very conservative industry….
• Market driver for lightweight, less expensive pressure
vessel for transportation of Compressed Natural Gas
(CNG) in marine, road and storage applications
Great Product, But.....
May 16, 2008TransCanada35
• Record high petroleum products pricing with oil >>$100US• Increase in global gas demand/price• Increase and more interest in gas discoveries• Power plant fuel replacement – imported oil results in
electricity charges >>$0.30US/kwh• Anti-flaring regulations/Kyoto• Government directives/incentives for CNG vehicle use• CNG a local solution with price determined by regional
market• CNG can provide a secure and reliable delivery• Diversification of energy sources• Locally available gas not subject to dynamics and volatility
of global gas markets
Key Drivers for Marine CNG
May 16, 2008TransCanada36
• Stranded gas• Associated gas• Stranded Markets• Incremental capacity• Provide “seed gas” to create the market to support a
pipeline• May replace need for a pipeline
Provides more market flexibilityCan be moved to other fields at end of lifePipeline environmental and political issues avoided
Marine CNG Applications
May 16, 2008TransCanada37
• CNG is a viable solution:25-2000 kilometres0.2 - 30 million scm/dRe-injection/flaring not feasible or desirableSmaller fields may be economic due to high re-injection costsReduced capital and operating costs versus LNG
• GTM™ technology (under license from NCF Industries) is approved and commercially available
• Power plant user must have incentive for switching from liquid fuel – cost differential
• CNG well suited for broader list of reserves smaller than required for LNG
CNG is the Solution
May 16, 2008TransCanada38
Economic Volume and Distance for CNG Transport
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Volume (mmscfd)
Dis
tanc
e (n
autic
al m
iles)
Marine CNG
Pipelines
New LNG
Marine CNG or Pipelines
First
Projects
Economic Volume and Distance for CNG Transportation
May 16, 2008TransCanada39
• Local recovery of stranded or otherwise unused energy• Provides inexpensive natural gas for use• Carbon credits available - $5-$25 US per tonne CO2
Natural gas ~ 2 kg/ m3 CO2• Emission reductions if replacing/displacing other fuels:
CO2 by 29% compared to oil, 44% to coalNOx & SOx by 80–100%Particulates between 90-100%
• CNG delivery consumes 5% energy vs. 12 - 14% for LNG and 38% for Methanol and Gas to Liquids
Environmental Benefits of CNG
May 16, 2008TransCanada40
Inlet Gas
Dehydration
Compression Gas Cooling
Gas Chilling(Optional)
Pipeline toLoading
Mooring Buoy or DocksideLoading System
Mooring Buoy or DocksideUnloading System
Pipeline to De-Compression Station
Heat Letdown Valve
Gas to Fuel System orCompression for
Pipeline
Low Pressure Fill Bypass
CNG System - Typical Process Schematic
May 16, 2008TransCanada41
Prototype under test
Demonstration Unit
ASME Code Case #2390 approval -October 2002
All containment system testing completed in 2001
GTM Fully Tested and Approved
May 16, 2008TransCanada42
DNV Rules for Compressed Natural Gas Carriers
Revision 1 October 2002for external hearing
Det Norske Veritas
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) approval for inland barge use – November 2001
Approval in Principle (AIP) of GTM based ocean going carriers received from Lloyds Register - September 2003
System Approvals and Standards
May 16, 2008TransCanada43
• ASME Code vessels approved by all major class societies and provides the safest, most reliable design available on the market
• Larger size and lower cost than conventional seamless tube steeland all composite gas cylinders; minimizes valving and manifolding.
• GTMs are up to 40% lighter than an all-steel containment vessels built to the same code with the same safety factors.
• Ships operate at ambient temperature so require no complicated loading schemes or refrigerated hold.
• Loading facilities require only compression, cooling, dehydration, and loading connections - similar to offshore crude loading.
• Unloading facilities require letdown station, compression and unloading connections.
GTM System Advantages
May 16, 2008TransCanada44
• Simplicity of system provides low initial capital commitment to initiate gas flow.
• Easily scalable by adding ships and additional loading facilities to increase gas deliveries.
• Flexibility of system allows ships to be re-deployed to other production areas or markets when no longer needed. Simplicity of loading and unloading facilities means little stranded capital.
• Economic over large range of flows and transport distances - lower volume and distance thresholds than LNG.
GTM System Advantages
May 16, 2008TransCanada46
Upstream Facilities Loading Marine Transportation System
Unloading Pipeline to Powerplant
Generic CNG Project Value Chain
May 16, 2008TransCanada48
• TransCanada and OSG joined forces to provide a complete CNG marine transport service through TransCNG International (TCI):
The most advanced compressed natural gas cargo containment system design, testing and approval program.
Both teams are financially capable and able to achieve favourable financing structures for any proposed operating entity for CNG transport
Previous CNG transport experience
Long Term commitment to energy transportation
Building to world recognized ASME code ensures ease of regulatory/environmental approvals
Ships can be staffed with local crews ensuring local employment benefits
World Class Delivery of Energy
May 16, 2008TransCanada49
• TCI system based on proven, reliable experience operated by professional, world class energy transportation companies
• Safety is built into the system, meeting or exceeding all codes and regulations
• System is designed to perform and has the full backing of TransCanada and OSG to deliver ‘Gold Standard’ service over the life of the contract.
Marine CNG Safety
May 16, 2008TransCanada50
• Safety is a cornerstone of TransCanada/OSG operating philosophy
• Training of crew/staff of marine transportation operator during execution phase at TransCanada training facility in Canada
• Gas safety, handling, gas loading and unloading, operational training and emergency procedures
• Gas maintenance practices, troubleshooting, monitoring and simulations
• Hands on training in operating facilities
Operations Training and Support
May 16, 2008TransCanada52
Deep Water Loading, Unloading and Ship Outfitting CapabilityWorld Class Facility: ASME Section VIII, Div 3 and Section Xand ABS Approval for GTM Trailers
Manufacturing License awarded to FPC Inc. – Plant Developed in Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Production commenced December 2007
Floating Pipeline Company (FPC)
May 16, 2008TransCanada54
Volume: ~ 240,000scfVolume: ~ 240,000scf(6,800 m3)(6,800 m3)
Weight: ~ 42 tonnesWeight: ~ 42 tonnes
Length: 12 Length: 12 -- 13.5 m13.5 m
Number of GTMs: 3Number of GTMs: 3
ISO Container FrameISO Container Frame
Standard ISO Standard ISO Container Chassis Container Chassis TrailerTrailer
FPC CNG Trailer
May 16, 2008TransCanada55
Volume: ~ 240,000scf(6,800 m3)
Weight: ~ 29 tonnes
Length: 12 - 13.5 m
Number of GTMs: 3
CNG ISO Containers
May 16, 2008TransCanada56
Shore storage of CNG provides for:
Extra supply in event of disruption of supply chain
Extra gas for electricity peaking
Flexibility in ship unloading rate/docking configurations
Availability for establishing Mother/Daughter CNG refueling stations
Storage Module (2 GTMs)
Stack (3 Modules High)
1m 2.3m
26m
Storage Capability
May 16, 2008TransCanada60
• Artumas Energy – Tanzania
• Progas Pakistan – Oman to Pakistan
• Todd Petroleum – Offshore New Zealand
• Husky Energy – Offshore Newfoundland
• Philippines Imports
• Indonesia in various places
• Israel from Turkey
• Jamaica imports
• Panama imports
• Trans Caspian Sea
• New Zealand Imports
• Barbados Imports
• Alaska to Hawaii
Recent Publicly Announced Potential CNG Projects
May 16, 2008TransCanada61
• More natural gas into energy mix in next few decades• Many fields too small to be developed for LNG or too far for
pipelines = CNG Niche Market• Marine CNG can provide lower cost gas supply to stranded
markets without the need for expensive infrastructure• Power plant fuel replacements are an ideal candidate for
CNG as the volume will underpin CNG development for industry and vehicles in local area
• CNG truck deliveries and storage can provide mother/daughter supply opportunities
• “Green” benefits converting from liquid fuels to CNG for power plants and vehicles
• TCI marine CNG transportation services – the complete solution
Summary
May 16, 2008TransCanada62
Mission The Canadian Energy Pipeline Association is dedicated to ensuring a strong and viable transmission pipeline industry in Canada in a manner that emphasizes public safety and pipeline integrity, social and environmental stewardship, and cost competitiveness.
Priorities
Pipeline safety and integrity
Environmental stewardship/climate change
Economic regulation and competitiveness
Regulatory efficiency
Aboriginal relations
Landowner relations
Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA)
May 16, 2008TransCanada63
• 6 trillion cubic feet of natural gas
• 950 million barrels of liquid hydrocarbons
• 100,000 kilometres of pipe
• $C67 billion in exports
Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA)
May 16, 2008TransCanada64
This award-winning program is the largest of its kind in Canada, with a participation rate of around 80% by students with a GPA of 3.0 or greater. Their goal is to produce "Superior Graduates". They strive to be the "School of First Choice". They currently have over 320 students on internships of 12-16 consecutive months. 10% of their interns work internationally - in Switzerland, Japan and the United States.
Engineering Internship Program at the Schulich School of Engineering
May 16, 2008TransCanada65
TransCanada’s Internship program provide an opportunity for TransCanada to hire skilled, motivated, career-oriented students on a year-round basis starting in January, May and September. They are an excellent source of temporary assistance for peak/seasonal overloads, special projects or backfills for vacation leave or long-term assignments.
As a requirement of their degree/diploma program, co-op or internship students alternate periods of full-time work with their academic terms to acquire practical experience prior to graduation.
Normal co-op term assignments are four to eight months.
Internship is similar to co-op education, usually with longer work terms of 12 months.
A co-op student's year or more of employment can be used towards required experience for a professional designation.
Co-op/Internship Students
May 16, 2008TransCanada66
The University of Calgary's Pipeline Engineering Centre (PEC) is affiliated with the Schulich School of Engineering's Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering. The Centre offers educational support and direction to the pipeline industry through the development and delivery of courses, seminars and workshops to industry in addition to the development of degree specializations and programs for graduate students. Through research, the centre seeks to be a leader in the generation and development of leading-edge knowledge and information for application in the area of pipeline engineering.
Pipeline Engineering Centre (PEC)
May 16, 2008TransCanada67
• For more information:TransCanada
Gary StephenPhone: +1 403 920-2025E-mail: [email protected]
Greg CanoPhone: +1 403 920-8142E-mail: [email protected]
OSGAngus CampbellPhone +44 191 218 0120E-mail: [email protected]
Contacts