tipsfor medicaeon)incidents)involving)immunosuppressants:)) ·...

1
M. TRUONG 1 , A. CHEN 1 , and C. HO 1,2 1. Ins)tute for Safe Medica)on Prac)ces Canada 2. Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto Immunosuppressants are typically cauEously prescribed due to their unique dosing regimens and broad spectrum of drug interac)ons. Their overall complexity and therapeu)c role, while important, can cause significant pa)ent harm when used incorrectly due to medica)on errors. ISMP Canada has iden)fied certain immunosuppressants such as Azathioprine, Cyclosporine and others to be “highalert” medicaEons. As a highalert drug class, immunosuppressants provide pa)ents with great benefits, but also with equally great risks. The following considera)ons encompass systembased strategies that may be integrated into daily prac)ce to reduce the risk of medica)on incidents. To ensure lookalike / soundalike drugs are clearly dis)nguished from one another; safeguards (e.g. physical dividers) should be integrated into dispensary storage or inventory areas. Standardiza)on of procedures will help mi)ga)ng errors, such as e prescribing (to prevent illegible handwri)ng) and comprehensive documenta)on (e.g. indica)on of therapy). Independent double checks to verify accuracy of order entry and dispensing, along with pa)ent communica)on during medica)on pick up, can help ensure that the right medica)on is being dispensed to the right pa)ent. Regular followup and monitoring is necessary not only for assessing efficacy, safety and tolerability of therapy, but also to create opportuni)es to update medica)on lists and pa)ent profiles. ISMP Canada would like to acknowledge support from the Ontario Ministry of Health and LongTerm Care for the development of the Community Pharmacy Incident Repor)ng (CPhIR) Program (hUp://www.cphir.ca ). The CPhIR Program also contributes to the Canadian Medica)on Incident Repor)ng and Preven)on System (CMIRPS)( hUp://www.ismpcanada.org/cmirps/ ). A goal of CMIRPS is to analyze medica)on incident reports and develop recommenda)ons for enhancing medica)on safety in all healthcare seWngs. The incidents anonymously reported by community pharmacy prac))oners to CPhIR were extremely helpful in the prepara)on of this mul)incident analysis. To iden)fy poten)al contribu)ng factors and areas of vulnerability towards medica)on incidents involving immunosuppressant therapies. To make recommenda)ons and hope to pave way for future developments in quality improvement ini)a)ves. 1. ISMP Canada. Community Pharmacy Incident Repor)ng (CPhIR) Database. hUp://www.cphir.ca Images: Blur icon by Rohith M S from thenounproject.com First aid kit icon by Sagit Milshtein from thenounproject.com Heart disease icon by To Uyen from thenounproject.com MedicaEon Incidents Involving Immunosuppressants: A MulEIncident Analysis For more informaEon contact us below: Website: www.ismpcanada.org Telephone: 4167333131 (Toronto) 186654ISMPC (18665447672) (Toll Free) Fax: 4167331146 Address: 4711 Yonge Street, Suite 501 Email: [email protected] IdenEfied potenEal contribuEng factors. Searched ISMP Canada Community Pharmacy Incident ReporEng (CPhIR) 1 Database for medicaEon incidents* involving immunosuppressants from January 2010 to May 2015. Selected Incidents for final analysis. 61 incidents* were retrieved but only 47 incidents* met the inclusion criteria and were included in this mulEincident analysis Analyzed and categorized incidents into three mains themes and further divided into subthemes. Provided recommendaEons to fill in paEentsafety gaps PREVENTION OF WRONG INDICATIONS MEDICATION INCIDENTS PREVENTION OF EFFECTIVENESSRELATED MEDICATION INCIDENTS PREVENTION OF SAFETYRELATED MEDICATION INCIDENTS LOOKALIKE & SOUNDALIKE FORMULATION UNDERDOSING LOOKALIKE & SOUNDALIKE FORMULATION Example) Physician ordered cyclosporine 75 mg once daily but pharmacist filled cyclophosphamide 75 mg once daily. Nurse no:ced error prior to administering to pa:ent. Example) The pharmacist filled Prograf® (immediate release tacrolimus) instead of Advagraf® (extended release tacrolimus). Error found when checking hardcopy name and DIN. Example) Heart transplant pa:ent received a prescrip:on wriAen for mycophenolate 1000 mg twice daily, however the prescrip:on filled as mycophenolate 500 mg, take 2 tablets once daily. Example) Daughter no:ced that the medica:on frequency of dosing was not right. Was dispensed QID (four :mes a day) and should have been QD (once daily). Physician wrote QD and was misread as QID. Example) A pa:ent receiving Rapamune® (sirolimus) in a hospital also received a couple doses of Biaxin® from a community pharmacy. AQer ini:a:ng Biaxin®, the pa:ent felt ill and consulted the physician. Biaxin® was switched to levofloxacin due to interac:on. RecommendaEons: U)lize electronic prescrip)on order sets Independent doublechecks Request prescribers to list indica)on on prescrip)on Gather informa)on from pa)ents during counselling and monitoring of drug therapy RecommendaEons: Computerized alerts act as forcing func)ons for highalert drugs Independent doublechecks Educa)on and con)nuous professional development on medica)on therapy management for clinicians and pharmacy staff RecommendaEons: Implement rules and policies for highalert drugs (e.g. documen)ng calcula)ons on prescrip)ons during orderentry Perform independent double checks RecommendaEons: Perform independent double checks for all prescrip)ons during the order entry and dispensing stage Engage in counselling and followup conversa)ons with pa)ents to address poten)al misuse of medica)ons and ensure compliance RecommendaEons: Encourage regular communica)on amongst healthcare providers within the pa)ent’s circle of care whenever changes are made to a pa)ent’s drug therapy Encourage pa)ents to pick up medica)ons from the same pharmacy for consolidated and comprehensive medica)on profiles *All relevant medicaEons of interest were collected from the American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS) classificaEon system from the American Society of HealthSystem Pharmacists (ASHP). Intravenous immunosuppressants were excluded from this analysis as they are not typically prescribed in the community/ambulatory sefng. May 2016 – Copyright © 2016 ISMP Canada. Poster designed by Kevin Li. INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE(S) METHOD(S) RESULT(S) CONCLUSION(S) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REFERENCES CONTACT INFORMATION

Upload: tranhanh

Post on 23-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tipsfor MedicaEon)Incidents)Involving)Immunosuppressants:)) · medicaon!incidents!involving!immunosuppressanttherapies.!! ... medicaEon)incidents*involving)immunosuppressants)from)January)2010)to)May)2015.!!))!

RESULT(S)    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M.  TRUONG1  ,  A.  CHEN1,  and    C.  HO  1,2    1.  Ins)tute  for  Safe  Medica)on  Prac)ces  Canada  2.  Leslie  Dan  Faculty  of  Pharmacy,  University  of  Toronto  

INTRODUCTION  •  Immunosuppressants  are  typically  cauEously  prescribed  due  to  their  

unique  dosing  regimens  and  broad  spectrum  of  drug  interac)ons.  Their  overall  complexity  and  therapeu)c  role,  while  important,  can  cause  significant  pa)ent  harm  when  used  incorrectly  due  to  medica)on  errors.  

•  ISMP  Canada  has  iden)fied  certain  immunosuppressants  such  as  Azathioprine,  Cyclosporine  and  others  to  be  “high-­‐alert”  medicaEons.    

CONCLUSION(S)    As  a  high-­‐alert  drug  class,  immunosuppressants  provide  pa)ents  with  great  benefits,  but  also  with  equally  great  risks.  The  following  considera)ons  encompass  system-­‐based  strategies  that  may  be  integrated  into  daily  prac)ce  to  reduce  the  risk  of  medica)on  incidents.    

•  To  ensure  look-­‐alike  /  sound-­‐alike  drugs  are  clearly  dis)nguished  from  one  another;  safeguards  (e.g.  physical  dividers)  should  be  integrated  into  dispensary  storage  or  inventory  areas.    

•  Standardiza)on  of  procedures  will  help  mi)ga)ng  errors,  such  as  e-­‐prescribing  (to  prevent  illegible  hand-­‐wri)ng)  and  comprehensive  documenta)on  (e.g.  indica)on  of  therapy).    

•  Independent  double  checks  to  verify  accuracy  of  order  entry  and  dispensing,  along  with  pa)ent  communica)on  during  medica)on  pick-­‐up,  can  help  ensure  that  the  right  medica)on  is  being  dispensed  to  the  right  pa)ent.    

•  Regular  follow-­‐up  and  monitoring  is  necessary  not  only  for  assessing  efficacy,  safety  and  tolerability  of  therapy,  but  also  to  create  opportuni)es  to  update  medica)on  lists  and  pa)ent  profiles.    

 

   

METHOD(S)  

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  ISMP  Canada  would  like  to  acknowledge  support  from  the  Ontario  Ministry  of  Health  and  Long-­‐Term  Care  for  the  development  of  the  Community  Pharmacy  Incident  Repor)ng  (CPhIR)  Program  (hUp://www.cphir.ca).  The  CPhIR  Program  also  contributes  to  the  Canadian  Medica)on  Incident  Repor)ng  and  Preven)on  System  (CMIRPS)  (hUp://www.ismp-­‐canada.org/cmirps/).  A  goal  of  CMIRPS  is  to  analyze  medica)on  incident  reports  and  develop  recommenda)ons  for  enhancing  medica)on  safety  in  all  healthcare  seWngs.  The  incidents  anonymously  reported  by  community  pharmacy  prac))oners  to  CPhIR  were  extremely  helpful  in  the  prepara)on  of  this  mul)-­‐incident  analysis.  

OBJECTIVE(S)  •  To  iden)fy  poten)al  contribu)ng  factors  and  areas  of  vulnerability  towards  

medica)on  incidents  involving  immunosuppressant  therapies.    

•  To  make  recommenda)ons  and  hope  to  pave  way  for  future  developments  in  quality  improvement  ini)a)ves.      

REFERENCES      

1.  ISMP  Canada.  Community  Pharmacy  Incident  Repor)ng  (CPhIR)  Database.  hUp://www.cphir.ca    Images:  Blur  icon  by  Rohith  M  S  from  thenounproject.com  First  aid  kit  icon  by  Sagit  Milshtein  from  thenounproject.com  Heart  disease  icon  by  To  Uyen  from  thenounproject.com  

MedicaEon  Incidents  Involving  Immunosuppressants:    A  MulE-­‐Incident  Analysis    

CONTACT  INFORMATION      

For  more  informaEon  contact  us  below:    

Website:      www.ismp-­‐canada.org    Telephone:      416-­‐733-­‐3131  (Toronto)  

     1-­‐866-­‐54-­‐ISMPC  (1-­‐866-­‐544-­‐7672)  (Toll  Free)  Fax:        416-­‐733-­‐1146  Address:      4711  Yonge  Street,  Suite  501  Email:      info@ismp-­‐canada.org    

Tips  for    InserEng  Graphs    

or  Images  Note:  Skip  the  following  procedure  if  your  graphs  were  created  in  PowerPoint®,  Illustrator  (eps  file)  or  Excel.  

Image  checking  procedure:  Aeer  you  insert  the  image  (72  dpi  screen  resolu)on)  and  resize*  to  fit,  right  click  on  it  and  select  Format  Picture.  When  the  pop-­‐up  window  comes  up,  click  on  size  and  check  the  scale.  The  image  will  print  beUer  if  its  width  and  height  scale  is  at  25%  or  lower  (20%  or  10%,  etc.)    

If  the  scale  of  the  image  is  higher  than  25%,  try  to  replace  it  with  a  larger  size  (more  dpi,  e.g.  300dpi)  image  if  possible.  (Note:  This  should  not  be  done  by  manually  stretching  the  image  to  a  larger  size.)  

If  the  resolu)on  of  the  image  is  300  dpi  or  higher  (400  or  600  dpi),  then  check  to  make  sure  its  scale  is  not  higher  than  100%.  

*To  resize  an  image  –  Click  on  the  image,  hold  the  Shie  key  down  and  drag  the  boUom  right  corner  to  resize  the  image  in  propor)on.  

(Delete  this  box  when  inser)ng  your  text  or  image.  This  is  only  a  reminder.)  

Tips  for  Title/Headers    Bar  Color  

How  to  change  the  background  color  for    the  poster  Etle  and  headers:  

Right  click  on  the  bar  and  select  Format  Autoshape.  When  the  pop-­‐up  window  comes  up,  select  your  color  under  “Fill”  and  then  “Color”  menu.  For  more  effects  select  Fill  Effects  under  the  Color  op)on.  

(Delete  this  box  when  inser)ng  your  text  or  image.  This  is  only  a  reminder.)        

Tips  for  Excel  Charts  Copy  and  paste  your  Excel  chart.  The  chart  can  be  stretched  to  fit  as  required.  If  you  need  to  edits  parts  of  the  chart,  we  recommend  you  edit  the  original  chart  in  Excel,  then  re-­‐paste  the  new  chart.  

(Delete  this  box  when  inser)ng  your  text  or  image.  This  is  only  a  reminder.)  

IdenEfied  potenEal  contribuEng  factors.  

Searched  ISMP  Canada  Community  Pharmacy  Incident  ReporEng  (CPhIR)1    Database  for  medicaEon  incidents*  involving  immunosuppressants  from  January  2010  to  May  2015.  

       

Selected  Incidents  for  final  analysis.  61  incidents*  were  retrieved  but  only  47  incidents*  met  the  inclusion  criteria  and  were  

included  in  this  mulE-­‐incident  analysis  

Analyzed  and  categorized  incidents  into  three  mains  themes  and  further  divided  into  subthemes.    

Provided  recommendaEons  to  fill  in  paEent-­‐safety  gaps  

PREVENTION  OF    WRONG  INDICATIONS  MEDICATION  INCIDENTS  

PREVENTION  OF    EFFECTIVENESS-­‐RELATED  MEDICATION  INCIDENTS  

PREVENTION  OF    SAFETY-­‐RELATED  

MEDICATION  INCIDENTS  

LOOK-­‐ALIKE  &  SOUND-­‐ALIKE   FORMULATION  

UNDER-­‐DOSING  

LOOK-­‐ALIKE  &  SOUND-­‐ALIKE   FORMULATION  

Example)  Physician  ordered  cyclosporine  75  mg  once  daily  but  pharmacist  filled  cyclophosphamide  75  mg  once  daily.  Nurse  no:ced  error  prior  to  administering  to  pa:ent.  

Example)  The  pharmacist  filled  Prograf®  (immediate  release  tacrolimus)  instead  of  Advagraf®  (extended  release  tacrolimus).  Error  found  when  checking  hardcopy  name  and  DIN.        

Example)  Heart  transplant  pa:ent  received  a  prescrip:on  wriAen  for  mycophenolate  1000  mg  twice  daily,  however  the  prescrip:on  filled  as  mycophenolate  500  mg,  take  2  tablets  once  daily.  

Example)  Daughter  no:ced  that  the  medica:on  frequency  of  dosing  was  not  right.  Was  

dispensed  QID  (four  :mes  a  day)  and  should  have  been  QD  (once  daily).  Physician  wrote  QD  

and  was  misread  as  QID.  

Example)  A  pa:ent  receiving  Rapamune®  (sirolimus)  in  a  hospital  also  received  a  couple  doses  of  Biaxin®  from  a  community  pharmacy.  AQer  ini:a:ng  Biaxin®,  the  pa:ent  felt  ill  and  consulted  the  physician.  Biaxin®  was  switched  

to  levofloxacin  due  to  interac:on.    

RecommendaEons:  •  U)lize  electronic  prescrip)on  order  sets  •  Independent  double-­‐checks  •  Request  prescribers  to  list  indica)on  on  

prescrip)on  •  Gather  informa)on  from  pa)ents  during  

counselling  and  monitoring  of  drug  therapy  

RecommendaEons:  •  Computerized  alerts  act  as  forcing  func)ons  

for  high-­‐alert  drugs  •  Independent  double-­‐checks  •  Educa)on  and  con)nuous  professional  

development  on  medica)on  therapy  management  for  clinicians  and  pharmacy  staff  

RecommendaEons:  •  Implement  rules  and  policies  for  high-­‐alert  drugs  (e.g.  documen)ng  calcula)ons  on  

prescrip)ons  during  order-­‐entry  •  Perform  independent  double  checks    

RecommendaEons:  •  Perform  independent  double  checks  for  all  

prescrip)ons  during  the  order  entry  and  dispensing  stage  

•  Engage  in  counselling  and  follow-­‐up  conversa)ons  with  pa)ents  to  address  poten)al  misuse  of  medica)ons  and  ensure  compliance  

RecommendaEons:  •  Encourage  regular  communica)on  

amongst  healthcare  providers  within  the  pa)ent’s  circle  of  care  whenever  changes  are  made  to  a  pa)ent’s  drug  therapy  

•  Encourage  pa)ents  to  pick  up  medica)ons  from  the  same  pharmacy  for  consolidated  and  comprehensive  medica)on  profiles  *All  relevant  medicaEons  of  interest  were  collected  from  the  American  Hospital  Formulary  Service  

(AHFS)  classificaEon  system  from  the  American  Society  of  Health-­‐System  Pharmacists  (ASHP).  Intravenous  immunosuppressants  were  excluded  from  this  analysis  as  they  are  not  typically  

prescribed  in  the  community/ambulatory  sefng.      

May  2016  –  Copyright  ©  2016  ISMP  Canada.  Poster  designed  by  Kevin  Li.  

INTRODUCTION  

OBJECTIVE(S)  

METHOD(S)  

RESULT(S)   CONCLUSION(S)  

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  

REFERENCES  

CONTACT  INFORMATION