tim haeberle api sc winter meeting

18
API Spec 6A Tensile Test Requirements Carry Over From API SC6 2011 Winter Meeting And 2011 Summer Meeting Tim Haeberle API SC6 2012 Winter Meeting

Upload: cuthbert-edwards

Post on 19-Jan-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Contents 1. Clarification Of Spec Reference For Standard Size Tensile Test Specimens 2. Clarification Of Tensile Test Acceptance Criteria For Mandrel Tubing Hangers And Mandrel Casing Hangers

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

API Spec 6A Tensile Test Requirements

Carry Over From API SC6 2011 Winter Meeting And 2011 Summer Meeting

Tim HaeberleAPI SC6 2012 Winter Meeting

Page 2: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

2GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

Contents

1. Clarification Of Spec Reference For Standard Size Tensile Test Specimens

2. Clarification Of Tensile Test Acceptance Criteria For Mandrel Tubing Hangers And Mandrel Casing Hangers

Page 3: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

3GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

Spec Reference For Tensile Test Specimens

Page 4: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

4GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

BackgroundCURRENT WORDING• 5.3.5.2 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for mandrel tubing hangers

and casing hangers)“b) test method:

Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370.Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the manufacturer’s specified requirements.”

• 5.4.2.3 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections)

“b) test method:Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370.Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the applicable requirements of Table 6.”

Page 5: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

5GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

BackgroundCURRENT WORDING•Section 5.6.4.1 (for TC’s for PSL 1)

Paragraph 5 - “Standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used to qualify carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, unless the physical configuration of the TC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used. Either standard 12,7 mm (0,500 in) or standard sub-size specimens (see ASTM A370) may be used to qualify CRA materials.”

•Section 5.7.4.1 (for QTC’s for PSL 2-4)Paragraph 6 - “Standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used, unless the physical configuration of the QTC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used.”

PROBLEM: •These paragraphs do not state that the “standard” specimens are ASTM

A370 standard-sized specimens, although they do state that when sub-size specimens are used, they shall be the ASTM A370 standard sub-size specimens. This leaves open the use of ISO 6892-1 standard specimens.

Page 6: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

6GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

The Solution

PROPOSED REVISIONS: •Section 5.6.4.1 Paragraph 5 - “ASTM A370 standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used to qualify carbon, low-alloy and stainless steels, unless the physical configuration of the TC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used. Either standard 12,5 mm (0,500 in) or standard sub-size specimens (see ASTM A370) may be used to qualify CRA materials.”•Section 5.7.4.1 Paragraph 6 - “ASTM A370 standard-sized, 12,5 mm (0,500 in) diameter tensile specimens shall be used, unless the physical configuration of the QTC prevents their use. In this case, the standard sub-size specimens referenced in ASTM A370 may be used.”

Need to fix in both ISO & API versions

Page 7: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

7GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

The SolutionJUSTIFICATION:• “ASTM A370” needs to be added to clarify that the only specimen

sizes currently permitted are the ASTM A370 specimen sizes. • ISO 6892-1 includes different size specimens that have a higher

gage length to diameter ratio. • The longer relative gage length of the ISO 6892-1 specimens can

result in failure to meet the API 6A specified elongation acceptance criteria.

• The use of ASTM A370 specimen sizes meets ISO 6892-1, since ISO 6892-1, section 6.1.1, paragraphs 7 and 8 state:“The dimensional tolerances of the test pieces shall be in accordance with the Annexes B to E (see 6.2).” Other test pieces such as those specified in relevant product standards or national standards may be used by agreement with the customer, e.g. ISO 3183 [1] (API 5L), ISO 11960 [2] (API 5CT), ASTM A370 [6], ASTM E8M [7], DIN 50125 [10], IACS W2 [13], and JIS Z2201 [14]”.

• ASTM A370 specimen sizes are routinely used in the US and Europe.

Page 8: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

8GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

ISO 6892-1 Circular Test Specimens

Page 9: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

9

API CSOEM SR3 Form

• Form ready for submittal• No money requested

Page 10: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

10

API Ballot

• Form ready for submittal

Page 11: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

11

Action Required

• Send the issue to a TG set up under the Materials Resource Group for review, refinement, and submittal for approval for ballot at the API SC6 2012 Summer Meeting

Or• Approve for ballot at the API SC6 2012 Winter

Page 12: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

12GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

Tensile Test Acceptance Criteria For Mandrel Tubing Hangers And Casing Hangers

Page 13: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

13GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

BackgroundCURRENT WORDING•5.3.5.2 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for mandrel tubing hangers and casing

hangers)“b) test method:

Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370.Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the manufacturer’s specified requirements.”

•5.4.2.3 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections)

“b) test method:Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370.Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the applicable requirements of Table 6.”

•API 6A Table 6, column 2 (for bodies, bonnets, and end and outlet connections)“0,2% offset yield strength”.

Page 14: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

14GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

Background

PROBLEM:•The yield strength acceptance criteria for bodies, bonnets, and

end and outlet connections is limited to the 0,2% offset method yield strength values in Table 6. This is good!

•However, for mandrel hangers it is up to the manufacturer to specify not only the yield strength in MPa (psi), but also the method of determining the yield strength.

•Unfortunately, if the manufacturer does not specify the method of determining the yield strength, methods other than the 0,2% offset method may be used, and these may give higher or lower values than would be obtained if the 0,2% offset method were used.

Need to fix in both ISO & API versions

Page 15: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

15GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

The Solution

PROPOSED REVISION: •5.3.5.2 PSL 2 to 4 tensile testing (for mandrel tubing hangers and

casing hangers)“b) test method:

Perform tensile tests at room temperature in accordance with the procedures specified in ISO 6892-1 or ASTM A370. Perform a minimum of one tensile test. The results of the tensile test(s) shall satisfy the manufacturer’s specified requirements. The 0,2% offset method shall be used for determination of the yield strength”.

JUSTIFICATION:•A standardized method of determining the yield strength needs to

be used for mandrel casing and tubing hangers.

Need to fix in both ISO & API versions

Page 16: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

16

API Ballot

• Form ready for submittal

Page 17: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

17

Action Required

• Send the issue to a TG set up under the Materials Resource Group for review, refinement, and submittal for approval for ballot at the API SC6 2012 Summer Meeting

Or• Approve for ballot at the API SC6 2012 Winter

Page 18: Tim Haeberle API SC Winter Meeting

18GE Confidential and Proprietary Information

GE2010 All Rights Reserved

End Of Presentation